This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Green Light or Green Burden: ESG’s Dual Effect on Financing Constraints in China’s Heavily Polluting Industries
by
Jingnan Wang
Jingnan Wang 1
,
Yue Liu
Yue Liu 1,*,
Boyan Zou
Boyan Zou 2,* and
Tonghai Ji
Tonghai Ji 3
1
School of Finance and Economics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 213013, China
2
Department of Economics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G7, Canada
3
School of Management, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(20), 9263; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209263 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 23 September 2025
/
Revised: 12 October 2025
/
Accepted: 16 October 2025
/
Published: 18 October 2025
Abstract
Using a firm-level panel of China’s heavily polluting industries from 2014 to 2023, this paper employs two-way fixed-effects regressions and a battery of robustness checks to examine how ESG performance affects corporate financing constraints and the channels through which effects operate. We uncover a paradox: overall ESG performance is associated with reduced financing constraints, whereas the environmental subcomponent alone significantly aggravates firms’ financing difficulties. Moderating analyses show that stricter regional environmental regulations and higher persistence in firms’ innovation outputs weaken the easing effect of aggregate ESG performance and may even fully offset it under certain conditions. Mechanism tests reveal that ESG mitigates constraints mainly by enhancing corporate reputation and curbing green agency costs. Heterogeneity analyses further indicate that the environmental-induced tightening effect is more pronounced in state-owned enterprises, firms in eastern provinces, and those located in regions with lower levels of new-quality productivity. These findings point to a trade-off between the short-term compliance costs of environmental investment and the longer-run signaling and informational benefits of ESG disclosure. Policy implications include the need for targeted green-finance support, improved ESG transparency and verification, and measures to accelerate innovation pathways that shorten the payback period for environmental investments.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Zou, B.; Ji, T.
Green Light or Green Burden: ESG’s Dual Effect on Financing Constraints in China’s Heavily Polluting Industries. Sustainability 2025, 17, 9263.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209263
AMA Style
Wang J, Liu Y, Zou B, Ji T.
Green Light or Green Burden: ESG’s Dual Effect on Financing Constraints in China’s Heavily Polluting Industries. Sustainability. 2025; 17(20):9263.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209263
Chicago/Turabian Style
Wang, Jingnan, Yue Liu, Boyan Zou, and Tonghai Ji.
2025. "Green Light or Green Burden: ESG’s Dual Effect on Financing Constraints in China’s Heavily Polluting Industries" Sustainability 17, no. 20: 9263.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209263
APA Style
Wang, J., Liu, Y., Zou, B., & Ji, T.
(2025). Green Light or Green Burden: ESG’s Dual Effect on Financing Constraints in China’s Heavily Polluting Industries. Sustainability, 17(20), 9263.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17209263
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.