1. Introduction
In today’s dynamic business landscape, internal corporate social responsibility (ICSR) is no longer optional but rather a strategic imperative for long term sustainability [
1]. Organisations are expected to go beyond economic performance, embracing ethical, sustainable, and socially responsible values that resonate with employees’ evolving expectations. Amidst heightened competition for talent, increasing demands for employee engagement and service quality and an intensified focus on corporate ethics, organisations also face a parallel demand for meaningful work experiences that foster engagement, promote thriving, and support long-term commitment [
2,
3,
4].
As a response, perceived internal CSR (PICSR) initiatives have gained recognition, alongside growing attention to constructs such as moral meaningfulness (MM), organisational embeddedness (OE) and intrapreneurial behaviour (IB). These constructs collectively reflect employees’ psychological connection to their workplace and their ability to thrive at work (TaW), a state of vitality and learning [
5]. Yet, despite their theoretical relevance, limited empirical work has examined their joint interactions in promoting employee thriving, particularly in ICSR-driven service contexts [
6,
7]. TaW has emerged as a desirable outcome in organisational research, linked to enhanced performance, commitment and adaptability [
5]. While prior studies have confirmed the positive impact of PICSR on employee outcomes such as TaW, and employee satisfaction [
8,
9], the mechanisms through which PICSR fosters TaW, particularly via OE and under varying levels of IB among service sector employees remains under-explored [
10].
OE, defined as the extent in which employees feel connected to and invested in their organisations, has been identified as a key psychological mechanism that may explain how supportive environments enable TaW [
11]. Similarly, MM, defined as the perceived alignment between one’s work and personal values, has been linked to engagement and well-being [
12], yet its role in shaping OE and TaW, particularly under varying levels of IB in the service sector remains empirically limited [
6]. In addition to these relational and moral drivers, employee behaviour also varies depending on individual-level tendencies [
13]. IB, particularly the dimensions of innovativeness and risk-taking, has been shown to shape employee responses under different work conditions. Yet, only a few studies have examined its role as a boundary condition in ICSR contexts [
14]. Employees who display tendencies towards innovativeness and risk-taking may respond to organisational supports such as ICSR and OE differently, depending on the degree of these tendencies, which warrants further investigation. Self-Determination Theory (SDT) [
15] explains human motivation through the fulfilment of three basic psychological needs. These are autonomy, competence and relatedness. Respectively, these needs concern the senses of volition, effectiveness and belonging and they collectively enable internalisation of values and sustained energy for growth and learning.
To address these gaps, guided by SDT, this study develops and tests a multi-path model in which PICSR and MM predict TaW directly and indirectly via OE. It further examines whether the interaction between OE and TaW is moderated by IB dimensions, addressing these gaps by uniquely integrating these critical factors with a comprehensible model. This investigation offers theoretical insights by extending SDT into the ICSR mechanisms that reinforce TaW. By integrating relational, moral and behavioural drivers of TaW, this study provides a more holistic understanding of positive employee outcomes. The study highlights the value of aligning ICSR initiatives with employees’ moral values, ethical principles and behavioural tendencies to foster motivation, innovation and retention in competitive service environments. Overall, this study aims to advance prior research on ICSR and TaW by jointly modelling MM, OE and IB within a single framework focused on service organisations. Unlike hospitality and education studies in which the main focus emphasises client-care climates and professional identity, examining a service setting, specifically banking, opens up new opportunities to examine how ICSR and MM translate into TaW via OE and when this route weakens under IB. Grounded in SDT, our microfoundations stress basic needs, satisfaction and bonding mechanisms through which ICSR converted into vitality and learning [
15]. Beyond routine conditions, recent crisis-CSR research shows organisations’ capabilities to reconfigure resources to quickly deliver innovative CSR practices, benefiting both external and internal stakeholders [
16]. The strict regulatory controls in banking sector allows exploration into how supportive ICSR and MM may impact OE and expression of IB. Framed this way, this study specifies how and when ICSR becomes a platform for resilience and innovation while clarifying the crises-relevant, human-centred pathways that recent CSR innovation studies called for.
2. Literature Review
Understanding how PICSR contributes to TaW is essential to explore its role in strengthening OE. PICSR addresses socially responsible practices adopted by the organisation towards enhancing employee well-being, welfare, and ethical treatment [
5,
17]. OE, on the other hand, captures the degree of an employee’s attachment to their organisation. It is a multi-façade construct, comprising links, fits, and sacrifices, each influencing how strongly one feels embedded in their workplace [
18,
19]. Value alignment between personal and organisational values fosters deep attachment and commitment, which is a key component in understanding the PICSR-OE link [
20,
21]. Per SDT, PICSR satisfies employees’ basic psychological needs by providing autonomy through flexible policies and participatory ICSR programmes. Moreover, it enables competence through skills development while ensuring relatedness through value alignment and ethical organisational climate. Organisations with employee-centred ICSR agendas increase employee commitment and attachment by reinforcing embeddedness [
22]. Organisations that actively promote inclusive and wellbeing-oriented ICSR agendas build stronger bonds between employees and leadership [
23]. These agendas reinforce trust, cooperation, and mutual respect, which deepen social ties within the workplace [
24,
25]. Employees who perceive strong organisational support through ICSR [
26], they often feel a greater sense of obligation and commitment which has direct consequences on turnover intentions [
27,
28,
29]. These employees may resist leaving due to invested time and energy, interpersonal relationships and forfeited ethical alignment [
30,
31,
32,
33].
SDT offers further insights into the PICSR-OE relationship. ICSR practices that support personal development promote autonomy, empowerment, and motivation [
20,
27]. Employees who feel they have decision-making power and value-aligned work are more likely to feel embedded [
34,
35]. Autonomy supports meaningful engagement. ICSR initiatives foster competence by making employees feel capable, confident, and proud of their contributions [
36]. It cultivates a work environment where individuals take pride in their work and also in their organisation, which reinforces their willingness to stay there, addressing the sacrifice dimension of embeddedness. For employees who feel personal and professional growth, ICSR becomes a source of meaning development which fosters relatedness by promoting inclusion and community-oriented practices, making employees feel valued and connected [
27]. These social bonds bring about a plethora of benefits, such as increasing embeddedness while reducing the desire to seek alternative employment [
23,
37]. Consistent with SDT, PICSR signals autonomy and fairness, satisfying competence and relatedness which strengthens employees perceived fit, links and sacrifice, increasing OE [
30,
34,
36].
H1a. PICSR positively influences OE.
While MM has been shown to directly influence TaW, it also plays an important role in fostering employees’ embeddedness in their organisation. Humans have an inherent drive to derive meaning from their actions, which in turn gives rise to a sense of purpose and value [
12]. Rosso et al. [
38] explain that employees seek more than financial returns from their work; they want work that feels meaningful. This has prompted organisations to adopt policies that help employees engage more deeply with their roles. MM concerns the meaning drawn from daily work activities, especially about ethics and personal values [
39,
40].
A positive ethical climate fosters trust and engagement by aligning individuals’ values with organisational ones [
6]. Ethical sense-making reinforces attachment and retention through OE. Employees who find moral meaning at work feel greater fit, motivation and belonging, which brings about loyalty and, attachment towards the fulfilment of obligations [
41,
42]. According to Deci et al. [
43], intrinsic motivation is a significant result of organisational agendas that foster support for moral action. SDT posits that alignment between organisational and personal values strengthens the need for autonomy. Moral alignment boosts relatedness and competence. When work aligns with the self, employees internalise organisational value, strengthening fit and links tied to embeddedness [
23,
36,
42]. Rosso et al. [
38] argue that organisations promoting a culture of MM, tend to nurture autonomy and recognise employees’ identities, which increases attachment. Zhang et al. [
44] find that employees who experience moral meaning at work tend to report greater satisfaction, commitment, and stronger social ties via robust relational links [
36]. Baard et al. [
45] emphasise that MM enhances competence by giving employees a sense of impact and purpose. When employees perceive their work as morally significant, they are more likely to invest in it, reinforcing their connection to the organisation.
H1b. MM positively affects OE.
While MM addresses employees’ internal motivation, their experiences of OE play an equally crucial role in enabling TaW. TaW often exhibit conscientiousness, reflected in traits such as persistence, dedication, and goal-orientation [
46]. These individuals demonstrate a strong sense of personal responsibility and commitment to their tasks [
47]. Organisationally embedded employees, in particular, tend to display high levels of connectedness and alignment with the organisation’s structure and values [
11]. When employees perceive a strong alignment or fit with an organisation’s vision, values, and culture, they experience a heightened sense of belonging [
41]. This sense of alignment satisfies relatedness need per SDT, which supports intrinsic motivation, vitality and learning.
The psychological needs outlined by SDT, autonomy, competence, and relatedness, help explore how OE supports TaW [
48]. Employees who feel emotionally and professionally invested in their workplace are less likely to leave, as the cost of quitting includes both personal and professional sacrifices. Additionally, long-term relationships developed within the organisation further strengthen embeddedness. These social bonds, built through shared goals and collaboration, become integral to an employee’s identity and work experience [
30]. The human connection aspect of embeddedness inspires individuals to flourish in their job outcomes, satisfying both the competence and relatedness components of SDT. OE provides the basis that nourishes relatedness, competence and autonomy. It assists in converting day-to-day experiences into vitality and learning [
30,
45,
46]. Highly embedded employees are more likely to thrive [
49]. It has been emphasised that employees’ experiences are shaped by the social interactions at work. Positive emotions fostered through these interactions contribute to a stronger sense of OE, which in turn enhances work engagement and TaW [
50].
H2. OE positively influences TaW.
To understand how ICSR shapes employee experiences, it is essential to define PICSR and its connection to TaW. PICSR refers to employees’ perceptions of an organisation’s collective ICSR behaviour. It captures employees’ interactions of how their organisation engages in socially and ethically responsible behaviour [
35]. These perceptions can significantly shape psychological experiences at work, influencing vitality and growth. TaW has been characterised as a psychological state of mind that influences one’s sense of vitality and learning at work [
51,
52]. Thriving is considered a key driver of organisational sustainability, with vitality described as aliveness and energy, and learning understood as growth through the acquisition of new knowledge and skills [
53,
54].
Building on these definitions, Spreitzer et al. [
50] offer a socially embedded model of TaW grounded in SDT with a self-adaptation perspective. They argue that individuals engage in more agentic behaviour, such as heedful relating, task focus, and exploration, when supported by certain contextual factors, such as supportive work climate and trust [
53]. Such contextual factors tend to affect how employees perceive TaW [
46]. Furthermore, per SDT ICSR practices that support autonomy and affirm competence would directly enhance vitality and learning, hence promoting TaW [
43]. Effective leadership can stimulate learning and vitality as well, which in turn leads to thriving by reinforcing knowledge accumulation from ICSR practices that harbour personal growth initiatives [
49]. This, in turn, develops passion among employees to TaW [
55]. ICSR initiatives such as decision-making discretion, and climates of respect and trust, create empowering environments that enhance autonomy and engagement [
56,
57].
The role of the organisation in enabling or hindering employee thriving has been a recurring theme in the literature. Spreitzer et al. [
50] argue that these systems may fuel or deprive TaW, depending on their design and emphasis on supportive practices such as ICSR. Certain factors such as decision-making discretion, providing fair feedback, creating a diverse working environment, and preventing incivility improve one’s potential for thriving [
58]. Supportive leadership and inclusive social environments, enhances both confidence and collaboration [
7,
56,
59]. By fostering a culture of trust and respect, ICSR strengthens self-efficacy and facilitates thriving through positive social exchange [
44,
58]. Spreitzer et al. [
50] explain that learning and vitality, the core components of TaW, are embedded in social systems. Goh et al. [
9] explain that TaW is dynamically dependent on organisational practices that provide support with access to information, support, opportunities, and power. These practices stem from the ICSR agenda of organisations, eventually giving rise to greater TaW [
56]. Specifically, within the SDT framework, PICSR initiatives indicate respect and support, hence satisfying the fundamental need for relatedness. Practices that invest in skill development ensures the competence dimension is fulfilled whereas the flexible and trust-based management enhances autonomy [
9,
15,
27,
43,
45].
H3a. PICSR positively influences TaW.
Beyond organisational systems and behaviours, the sense of MM that employees derive from their work also plays a critical role in enabling TaW. Kahn [
60] defined meaningfulness as a psychological state in which individuals perceive themselves as valued, appreciated, worthwhile, and useful. MM refers to how one draws meaning from their work regarding their values and beliefs [
61], reflecting a sense that one’s work matters for personal and organisational outcomes [
62]. This sense of self-worth fosters intrinsic motivation and deeper engagement. When employees perceive their work as morally aligned with their values, they are more likely to thrive [
50]. Moral meaning in work enhances psychological safety and aligns employee values with the company [
38].
Within the SDT framework, Ryan and Deci [
15] suggest that when work is experienced as morally meaningful, job responsibilities and personal values become more closely aligned [
63]. Per SDT, this alignment establishes autonomy and authenticity, which strengthens intrinsic motivation, thus boosting employee thriving [
45]. Employees who find moral meaning in their work tend to be more motivated in developing skills that would potentially aid them in excelling. These skills help employees achieve work goals and leave a positive impact, bolstered by thriving [
37,
64]. MM and purpose enhance social bonds which connect employees with the organisation’s missions, reinforcing loyalty and commitment [
15,
65], ensuring the relatedness condition of SDT. With a heightened sense of belonging and shared purpose, employees foster a morally driven motivation towards thriving [
27,
45].
H3b. MM positively influences TaW.
Beyond the direct influences presented in the literature, OE may also function as a mediator, linking both PICSR and MM to TaW. From an SDT perspective, OE serves the structural mechanism that converts need satisfaction from PICSR and MM into sustained fulfilment that enables TaW. Rupp and Mallory [
22] explain that ICSR initiatives, in particular those that embrace autonomy, fairness, and psychological safety, can foster strong bonds between the organisation and the employees, as well as, between the employees [
34]. Likewise, employees who draw a moral meaning from their work tend to be emotionally more invested and aligned with the organisation’s values. These, in turn, strengthen their fit, links, and perceived sacrifices, further intensifying OE [
38,
41]. From an SDT perspective, OE greatly helps with ensuring the fulfilment of psychological needs, namely, relatedness, competence, and autonomy. This enables vitality and learning, which drive TaW. Therefore, OE may act as the mechanism through which PICSR and MM are translated into TaW.
H4a. OE mediates the relationship between PICSR and TaW.
H4b. OE mediates the relationship between MM and TaW.
In addition to the direct effects of PICSR and OE on TaW, IB may moderate the strength of these relationships, particularly through risk-taking and innovativeness. Pinchot [
66] describes intrapreneurs as individuals who use already existing resources to develop innovative solutions. While intrapreneurship shares many crucial similarities with entrepreneurship, it diverges on the basis of innovativeness, proactiveness, and risk-taking behaviour [
67]. An intrapreneur would not be willing to risk the capital by leaving the organisation should they face a problem [
68]. Intrapreneurs take proactive initiatives to implement their ideas, offering innovative solutions to ongoing problems using internal resources, rather than becoming part of the problem. IB has been linked to stronger alignment between personal goals and organisational objectives, which may shape the relationship between OE and TaW [
13]. Employees who are embedded and intrinsically motivated are more likely to engage in innovative practices that promote vitality and learning at work, aligning with SDT’s emphasis on autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Stam et al. [
69] suggest that employees engaging in IB, experience personal development, self-appreciation, and a sense of purpose, reinforcing the competence dimension of SDT [
69]. Moreover, when personal and organisational goals align, interpersonal harmony and cooperation increase [
70]. IB is particularly valuable in dynamic environments, where proactive and innovative actions sustain competitive advantage [
71].
Belitski et al. [
13] explain that employees engaging in IB tend to work in an environment that supports autonomy, which reinforces intrinsic motivation. Autonomy, supportive climates allow individuals to reshape their roles, pursue ideas, and feel more purposeful with outcomes that are strongly tied to TaW. Risk-taking, a core dimension of IB, is deeply linked to autonomy [
70]. Genuine autonomy requires room for risk, which in turn depends on leadership that does not punish failure but encourages experimentation [
72]. According to SDT, relatedness also plays a role. Deci et al. [
43] explain that employees feel more confident in taking risks when their teams and leaders are supportive. Collaborative intrapreneurs rely on strong professional networks to share ideas, enhancing their sense of belonging and purpose [
45]. Innovativeness, another key IB dimension, involves generating and implementing novel ideas, giving rise to better solutions and alternative approaches to ongoing problems or inefficiencies. Employees with strong innovative strive for achievement and continuous improvement by contributing to organisational evolution [
69]. This further reinforces their sense of embeddedness and personal growth. As with risk-taking, innovativeness depends on autonomy. Excessive control can greatly undermine creativity and hinder risk-taking behaviour [
73]. Employees, who feel competent and appreciated are more likely to innovate by showcasing their mastery, as competence and relatedness boost confidence and engagement. When leaders and colleagues value new ideas, it strengthens relatedness and encourages further innovation, empowering risk-taking employees. The study’s theoretical framework, specifying the hypothesised relationships, has been presented in
Figure 1.
H5a. Innovativeness moderates the relationship between OE and TaW, assuming that the link will be stronger when innovativeness is higher.
H5b. Risk-taking behaviour moderates the relationship between OE and TaW, assuming that the link will be stronger when risk-taking behaviour is higher.