Next Article in Journal
Triple Impact of Green Technology, Globalization, and Democracy on Ecological Footprint: A Method of Moment Quantile Regression Analysis in G7 Economies
Previous Article in Journal
The Interaction of Diversification Strategies, Resilience, and Digital Capabilities in Driving Supply Chain Sustainability in Saudi Arabia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

AI-Driven Energy Optimization in Urban Logistics: Implications for Smart SCM in Dubai

1
Faculty of Business Management, Emirates Aviation University, Dubai P.O. Box 53044, United Arab Emirates
2
College of Business, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(18), 8301; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188301
Submission received: 19 July 2025 / Revised: 21 August 2025 / Accepted: 4 September 2025 / Published: 16 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Digital Innovation in Sustainable Economics and Business)

Abstract

This paper aims to explore the role artificial intelligence (AI) technologies play in optimizing energy consumption levels in urban logistical systems, including the strategic implications of such technologies on smart supply chain management (SCM) in Dubai. The mixed-methods study was adopted and applied, in which quantitative measures of the performance of 16 public–private organizations were merged with qualitative evidence provided through semi-structured interviews and document analysis. AI solutions that were assessed in the research included the use of predictive routing, dynamic fleet scheduling, IoT-base monitoring, and smart warehousing. Results indicate an overall decrease of 13.9% in fuel consumption, 17.3% in energy and 259.4 kg in monthly CO2 emissions by the organization on average by adopting AI. These findings were proven by the simulation model, which estimated that the delivery efficiency would increase within an AI-driven scenario and be scalable in the future. Other important impediments were also outlined in the study, such as constraint of legacy systems, skills gap, and interoperability of data. Implications point to the necessity of the incorporation of digital governance, data protocol standardization, and AI-compatible city planning to improve the urban SCM of Dubai, through the terms of sustainability and resilience. In this study, a transferable structure is provided that can be utilized by cities that are interested in matching AI innovation and energy and logistics goals, in terms of policy objectives.

1. Introduction

The rapid trends in city development have created a strong need for highly efficient, environment-friendly and technology-enhanced logistics systems that are able to deliver quickly with minor adverse effects on environment. Smart cities have gained the importance of logistical optimization to overcome infrastructure issues, environmental aspects, and economic demand or requirements through urban logistics. Logistics and transportation involve about a quarter of the total energy expended in the city, and last-mile delivery is the most inefficient part in respect to energy percentages and the extent of emissions [1].
This paper examines how artificial intelligence (AI) technologies can optimize energy consumption in Dubai’s urban logistics. The problem for the research is that although Dubai has implemented a variety of technologies related to smart mobility and logistics, against which it is possible to identify the results of the energy intelligence of the city supply chain, in the frameworks of the latter, there is no accepted methodology to measure the energy impact of the AI applications. The literature identifies a gap in the research, especially in the GCC region, as they have been more inclined towards digitalization without giving more insight into the use of AI in enhancing energy efficiency in the supply chain management-related processes [2]. The research problem is that although Dubai has implemented long-term visions of clean energy Smart Dubai 2021, the issue of energy performance in logistics systems supported by AI is not fully assessed empirically with simulation-based approaches [3,4]. This is a demerit, since it does not help policymakers and industry leaders make evidence-based decisions on AI adoption.
The present study is original research that combines mixed-methods empirical research and simulation modeling with policy recommendations aimed at energy optimization in the urban logistics environment of Dubai. Although previous studies may examine AI adoption or its sustainability effects in separate studies, the present paper presents the combination of the quantitative indicators of the performance, qualitative perception of the stakeholders, and simulation outputs to the same analytical framework, which is also unique and novel. Also, it generates a greater step by coming up with a transferable conceptual model that can be adopted by other emerging smart cities in relation to their governance, infrastructure and their environment.
Global leaders on smart city development are important points of reference. Singapore is rolling out real-time fleet management and AI-powered predictive traffic control, and Oslo is using AI to manage electric vehicle logistics and emissions, also through data-informed city-level planning. These two examples show how intelligent systems may be used to match logistics infrastructure to environmental goals. In this research paper, the efforts of Dubai are contrasted with such international best practices as a way to set the pace of progress made by the city in a global perspective.
Being one of the global leaders in the development of smart cities, Dubai has introduced several strategic plans that are intended to achieve sustainability and digitalization. It aims to achieve 75 percent clean energy by 2050 through its Clean Energy Strategy 2050, and Smart Dubai facilitates AI implementation to elevate efficiency during operation in logistics, supply chain management (SCM), and other types of emerging technology [3,4]. The ability of AI to make self-corrective decisions and predictive analytics, and the follow-up nature of operation control helps optimize the urban logistics systems of route planning and fleet integration, demand forecasts, and automatized warehouses [5,6], which lowers the expenditure of energy.
The goal of the research is to assess the application of AI in enhancing energy use in urban logistics within Dubai to form evidence-based guidelines that may be deployed in a scalable and sustainable manner. Namely, the study will focus on the following:
  • Finding AI applications that already exist within the urban logistics system operating in Dubai and discuss their technical base.
  • Measuring their costs in terms of energy consumption, fuel usage, and carbon emissions.
  • Evaluating the issues and facilitators that determine the adoption of AI.
  • Extrapolating an AI-based energy optimization urban SCM model.
  • Offering policy recommendations for scalable and sustainable deployment.
Answering these goals, this paper will be able to contribute to bridging the gap between innovation in the sphere of AI and its measurable impacts on the energy sector, presenting the structured framework, which connects the urban logistics innovation with the strategies of energy and sustainability, with Dubai as the case study.

2. Literature Review

2.1. AI in Supply Chain and Logistics

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly becoming a game-changer in contemporary supply chain management (SCM), as it promotes effectiveness, decision making, and responsiveness within a logistical chain. Machine learning (ML), reinforcement learning, and self-driving cars are just some AI technologies that have been widely used to streamline routing, forecast margins, and robotize warehouses [7,8,9]. These systems facilitate in-time decision making, minimize waste and enhance the levels of services.
New research also notes the role AI plays in logistics performance. To illustrate the point, ref. [10] revealed that deep learning algorithms can be utilized to improve efficiency in last-mile delivery by analyzing data in real-time. In the same manner, ref. [11] demonstrated the capacity of reinforcement learning to enhance dynamic routing and coordination of deliveries. Vehicle tracking, predictive maintenance, and autonomous deliveries are some of the examples of how the integration of AI has saved companies a fortune in terms of operational costs [12,13].
Moreover, AI-assisted logistics have been on the rise in unpredictable conditions, where realizing the demand leads to an irregular pattern and traffic bottlenecks that make planning difficult [14,15,16]. The new paradigm of efficient and sustainable SCM has become Logistics 4.0 that is based on IoT, AI, and big data [17].

2.2. Energy Optimization in Logistics

Another topic that is currently of great concern to the logistic industry is energy efficiency, especially in cities where logistics are energy-intensive, due to both transportation and warehousing. To address these issues, AI-based systems are becoming more popular because they optimize the delivery schedule, minimize idling time, and enhance the performance of the fleet [18,19].
Ref. [5] underlines that AI in logistics can help save more than 20 percent of energy costs due to the smart route selection and the demand-forecasting feature. They are likewise the case in the study conducted by [20], who discovered that AI technologies in fleet management and cold chain logistics are crucial to implementation in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
The emerging high-tech solutions like digital twins, clever sensors, and AI-powered energy control are transforming logistics activities in terms of their power consumption [21,22,23]. Ref. [24] asserts that the old ways of allocating vehicles and energy consumption analytics using AI would enhance the efficiency of the urban freight distribution process and be more sustainable.
New technologies such as swarm intelligence and blockchain combined with AI are also developing to enable a greener transport infrastructure and to optimize distributed energy systems [25,26].

2.3. Smart Cities and Sustainable SCM

Digital technologies, such as AI, are a foundation of smart cities and help deliver efficiency and sustainability within a city. AI can improve urban logistics (one of the key processes in the functioning of smart cities) by means of dynamic coordination, the alleviation of congestions, and pollution control [27,28,29].
The real-life example of successful smart logistics plans with a focus on the integration of AI in traffic optimization, emission reduction, and alternative energy transitions is associated with major cities such as Singapore, Oslo, and Amsterdam [30,31]. The areas of influx in these cities are logical analytics of data in real-time, and autonomous vehicles facilitate the accuracy of delivery and decrease carbon footprint.
The trends in developing smart cities across the world are reflected in the Smart Dubai and Clean Energy Strategy 2050 undertaken by Dubai, which highlights the place of AI in sustainable logistics [32]; authors also note that cities’ implementation of smart SCM needs the alignment of technology, governance, and infrastructure.
AI-driven platforms of urban logistics associations are driving the new models of environmental and economic sustainability [33,34]. These models depend on common delivery systems, smart routing, and aggregate data environment to achieve Net Zero objectives.

2.4. Identified Gaps and Theoretical Underpinnings

Even though the existing literature shows the possibilities of AI in logistics and energy efficiency optimization, very few studies connect these implementations to the wider scope of smart cities [4,5,35]. Limited research is available that specifically relates AI-based logistics to country energy plans specifically in GCC.
This study will rely on socio-technical systems theory [36] to see how human–technology interactions will occur when implementing AI, and on the resource-based view (RBV) [37] to conceptualize AI and energy-efficiency optimization as strategic organization resources. Moreover, their environmental performance in logistic networks can be analyzed with the help of the sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) framework [38,39].
One of the current research gaps is lacking in empirical evidence in the fast-developing cities such as Dubai, where AI logistics are being developed, although no systematic frameworks on energy performance exist.
Recent peer-reviewed research underscores the transformative role of AI in supply chain management and urban logistics. Applications such as deep reinforcement learning for vehicle routing [40,41] and convolutional neural networks for traffic prediction [10,42] have demonstrated measurable improvements in delivery efficiency and energy savings. Hybrid optimization frameworks combining machine learning with operations research models, have been applied successfully in urban freight contexts [43,44]. In smart cities such as Singapore, Oslo, and Amsterdam, AI is integrated with sustainability policies to achieve low-carbon logistics [24,27,45]. IoT-enhanced AI systems improve real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance [46,47,48], while blockchain integration enhances transparency and trust [25,49]. Ethical and governance considerations are increasingly embedded in urban AI deployment strategies [50,51], highlighting the importance of fairness and accountability in AI-driven SCM.
To introduce the existing body of knowledge in a structured way, Table 1 lists the most significant works about AI-guided urban logistics and energy optimization. These works are listed in the table according to their area of focus, methodologies, major findings and the direct application to this study. The systematic nature of this material makes both features—such as the variety of employed methods, which can include reinforcement learning algorithms and IoT-based energy management frameworks--and the universality of the evidence in favor of the role of AI in enhancing the efficiency and sustainability of logistics stand out. The table also helps ascertain the research gap that this paper will fill, i.e., the lack of a comprehensive palette incorporating mixed-methods and a simulation-based framework to quantify the energy implications of AI in the GCC region, with Dubai as a case study.

3. Methodology

3.1. Research Design and Rationale

The research involves case study-based mixed-methods to analyze the influence of the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on the optimization of energy in urban logistic systems in the city of Dubai. The combination of the quantitative measures of the performance and the qualitative ideas of stakeholders concerning them and the inability to quantify the aspects of the AI implementation qualifies implementers to use the mixed-methods approach [52,53]. The method allows one to find an opportunity to triangulate the data and even allows one to obtain a deeper understanding of the consequences of operation and even the institutions themselves.
The proposed study will be a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design; it uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to offer both breadth and depth of understanding the effect of AI on energy optimization in the logistics of the urban area in Dubai. The logic behind the design lies in the fact that it first measures the effects of performance and then investigates the situational conditions under which such findings were created, thus realizing an in-depth interpretation. The quantification level entailed the gathering and examination of vital performance indicators (KPIs) of the participating organizations, such as consumption of fuel, CO2 emitted, and quality of delivery. These data were discussed, taking into consideration descriptive statistics and comparing data to find trends and quantifiable effects of the adoption of AI.
The qualitative stage consisted of 24 semi-structured interviews with stakeholders from logistics companies, technology vendors, and government entities. It was coded thematically in NVivo 14, which was a six-step process outlined as the following: (1) transcription and data familiarization, (2) initial coding, (3) categorization of codes into themes, (4) theme refinement, (5) validation using peer review and (6) integration into the final framework. This provided inter-coder reliability, as well as thematic validity.
Quantitative and qualitative findings were combined by triangulation, where the understanding that emerged during the interviews was correlated with the trends and outputs of the simulation model to provide a comprehensive picture of the quantitative results. Such a procedure enabled us to cross-validate findings, identify convergence and divergence among data sources, and interpret them in context. The outputs of the simulation modeling were included in the synthesis with the connections between the scenario outcomes, with the interview topics concerning the factors of the enablers and barriers to operations, as well as policy implications. The mixed-methods integration framework will make sure that its conclusions rest on the empirical data on the performance as well as the viewpoints of the stakeholders.
The visualization of the process of the research is presented in Figure 1, where the combination of qualitative and quantitative streams of data is involved through iterative thematic analysis and cross-sectoral synthesis. The diagram illustrates the quantitative phase (KPI data collection and statistical analysis), the qualitative phase (semi-structured interviews and NVivo thematic coding), and the integration phase (triangulation of quantitative results, interview findings, and simulation outputs). Arrows indicate the flow of data and insights between phases, culminating in a synthesized analysis linked directly to the study’s objectives.
The mixed-methods design was selected to integrate both measurable performance outcomes and stakeholder insights, enabling a richer understanding of AI’s impact on logistics. This approach is particularly well-suited to complex, multi-level phenomena such as smart city logistics, where both technical and organizational factors are at play [40,51].
Our mixed-methods design aligns with established SCM research methodologies [51,54], enabling triangulation between quantitative KPI data and qualitative interview insights [15,55]. Simulation modeling in urban freight contexts is well supported in the literature [56,57], with discrete-event simulation platforms like AnyLogic and Arena commonly used to assess AI interventions under varied demand conditions [42,58]. This multi-layered approach enhances construct validity and replicability, in line with best practices from transportation modeling studies [59,60].

3.2. Case Selection Justification

Dubai was selected as the primary case, since it is a strategic city as far as smart innovation of cities is concerned. It is an active developer of AI in the areas of transport, logistics, and sustainability, according to the concepts of the Smart Dubai 2021 Strategy and Dubai Clean Energy Strategy 2050 [2,3]. Dubai innovation ecosystem (a combination of mainly public and a few sources of private engagement) and the developed digital platform offers the best test-ground to study the interaction between AIs and energy efficiency and the transformation of urban logistics.

3.3. Data Collection

The triangulation method of data collection [61] has been applied to conduct the study, which means that it implies the utilization of three mutually relevant sources:
  • Semi-Structured Interviews
    To identify participants in the interviews, purposive selection methods were adopted with the criteria being their knowledge and area of deployment in the organization, and areas of interest in the study. The selection criteria were the direct engagement in logistics processes, the use of AI, the planning of cities, or the policymaking of sustainability. The key stakeholders who were involved as participants were operations managers, digital transformation leaders, government regulators, and academic researchers with at least five years of domain experience. A mix of 15 stakeholders of five crucial types, such as logistics service providers, smart city authorities, AI technology sellers, energy regulators, and academic research, was interviewed. Finding sample participants was also based on purposive sampling techniques to ensure both professional and experience in the field on the one side, and a broad range of institutions on the other side. Some of the issues addressed in the interview guide included the implementation of the AI process, saving energy repercussions, barriers to implementation, and the consistency of policies.
  • Document and Policy Analysis
    Academic publications in peer-reviewed journals were used in the secondary literature analysis and were sourced out of Scopus, ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar databases. To promote construct and external validity, triangulation was obtained through the cross-validation of the perspectives of stakeholders with internal and external performance data and external scholarly evidence [62]. Documents such as strategic plans, white papers, act reports, and regulatory guidelines of more than 30 documents were analyzed. Major documents were the Clean Energy Strategy 2050 in Dubai, the texts of the policy by Smart Dubai, and the reports of the Roads and Transport Authority (RTA), the Dubai Electricity and Water Authority (DEWA), and the Dubai Future Foundation. This enabled a triangulation of the policy intent, and realities of the implementation.
  • Quantitative Performance Data
    The secondary data on fuel consumption, energy saving, and CO2 emission rates and delivery efficiency rates before and after the usage of AI were found in 16 organizations that took part in the study. These performance indicators were critical to the effects AI applications had in measuring the outcomes of logistics.
The flow and sources of data collection efforts are summarized in Figure 2.

3.4. Data Analysis Procedures

The data analysis was conducted in three structured phases:
  • Qualitative Analysis
    NVivo 12 software was used in thematic analysis. The hybrid approach toward coding was taken based on research questions for the study (e.g., barriers to the implementation of AI and effects of energy), proscriptive codes were developed, and inductive code was defined by the repetitive patterns observed in the interview. Axial coding was used to consolidate themes, and the team of researchers undertook this process in a form of peer-debriefing [63]. A combined deductive–inductive coding approach was applied to identify themes related to AI integration, institutional enablers/barriers, and sustainability performance. This technique is consistent with best practices in qualitative logistics research [63].
  • Quantitative Analysis
    Descriptive statistical analysis was applied to energy and logistics performance indicators. Key metrics included:
    • Energy savings (%).
    • Fuel efficiency improvements (%).
    • CO2 reduction (kg/month).
    • Delivery time reduction (minutes/order).
    Cross-organizational comparisons were made to assess the variation in outcomes across public and private entities.
  • Simulation Modeling
    To complement real-world data, a simulation model was developed using the AnyLogic and Arena platforms. The model replicated urban delivery cycles under AI-optimized and non-AI conditions using real-world parameters. Results from this simulation validated the empirical performance outcomes and projected the scalability of AI solutions.
Figure 3 illustrates the multi-layered analytical framework used for data synthesis and performance validation.

3.5. Research Quality and Limitations

The study ensured construct validity through data triangulation and external validity via simulation modeling. Reliability was enhanced through transparent documentation of coding procedures and data cleaning methods. Nonetheless, the research faced limitations including the following:
  • Restricted access to some proprietary operational data.
  • Potential response bias in interviews.
  • Limited generalizability beyond Dubai without contextual adaptation.
Despite these constraints, the integration of multiple methods, sectors, and data forms supports a robust and transferable research design.
There is a chance of response bias around the interview results, and this is because some of the respondents might have been tempted to give desired answers rather than the truth about how the organization was affected with the adoption of AI. It is also possible to believe that such bias may be demonstrated due to selective reporting of difficulties surrounding an operation, particularly within a competitive business environment. A few measures were thus implemented to ensure that such risks would be reduced: (1) triangulation of interviews against other secondary sources, including government reports and reports on operational statistics, as well as documents written about the vendors; (2) responses were anonymized to encourage honest participation; and (3) qualitative insights were cross-validated with the outputs of the simulations to highlight inconsistency or exaggeration.
There are limitations affecting the generalizability of the findings, specifically about certain limitations imminent in the environment in Dubai, such as the highly digital platform, highly proactive regulatory system and the centralized approach to governance. To enable the adaptation of these findings to other urban contexts, we should consider a contextual adaptation model that will consider three key areas of contextual change, namely: (1) the maturity of the local digital infrastructure and the receptiveness of the technology to the AI; (2) the regulatory environment, in terms of data governance and sustainability requirements; and (3) the capacity of stakeholders to integrate technology in both the private and public sector. The urban planners and policymakers in other cities can use the fundamental knowledge of this study after they have adjusted by these variables; they should be able to fit within the governance, market structure, and maturity of their respective technological differences.

3.6. Ethical Considerations

This research was ethically performed in terms of ethics in qualitative research. Informed consent was obtained by all the interview subjects and where required, data was anonymized. The names of companies like Aramex, DHL, and RTA Dubai were used only when the publicly available information proved the statements, or in cases where the companies agreed to be listed. The Institutional Review Board of Emirates Aviation University had given ethical clearance, and protocols of interviews had adhered to confidentiality practices of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

4. Results and Findings

4.1. Current State of AI Integration in Urban Logistics in Dubai

The urban logistics infrastructure of Dubai undergoes fast change because public and private sectors implement artificial intelligence technologies in their operations. Major logistics providers and smart city institutions have incorporated AI tools between 2018 and 2022 to achieve various operational and energy savings, alongside service performance optimization. Multiple studies show how artificial intelligence has become indispensable for logistics advancement through implementations of predictive routing technology combined with real-time fleet oversight and automated scheduling and dynamic parcel organization capabilities.
The logistics providers Aramex and DHL, as well as Careem Logistics, have introduced AI-based solutions that affect their fundamental delivery operations and business operations. Operational efficiency benefits from three main AI-powered solutions, which blend dynamic fleet allocation with machine learning-based route planning and IoT sensors for both asset tracking and energy monitoring. The Smart Dubai Office, together with the Dubai Future Foundation, work as public partners to advance AI-based pilot initiatives through which they optimize data systems and improve infrastructure while enhancing last-mile distribution methods.
Dubai’s urban logistics infrastructure is rapidly transforming as both public and private sector actors integrate artificial intelligence (AI) technologies into their operations. Between 2018 and 2022, major logistics providers and smart city institutions adopted a variety of AI applications, delivering measurable operational and environmental benefits.
In the organizations studied, AI adoption was not uniform; each entity deployed different types of AI algorithms and architectures tailored to their operational needs. Based on interviews, technical documentation, and vendor disclosures, we identified the following prevalent AI technologies:
Predictive Routing: Employed by RTA Dubai, University of Dubai, and UAEU, using gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDT) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for real-time traffic image processing. These models achieved faster route recalculation speeds and improved delivery time reduction by 11–14% compared to traditional rule-based systems.
Dynamic Scheduling: Implemented by Aramex, Careem Logistics, and RTA Dubai, leveraging reinforcement learning (Q-learning variants) and evolutionary algorithms for multi-vehicle scheduling. In comparative analysis, reinforcement learning methods achieved 12–15% higher fuel efficiency improvement over baseline supervised-learning scheduling approaches.
IoT-Based Monitoring: Used by DHL, Smart Dubai, the Dubai Carbon Centre, and Huawei UAE, applying supervised-learning models (Random Forest, Support Vector Machines) to detect anomalies in fuel usage and vehicle performance. These methods enabled predictive maintenance and energy anomaly alerts, leading to a 5–7% improvement in fleet uptime.
Autonomous Vehicle Operations: Adopted by IBM MENA and DEWA, using deep neural networks (DNNs) for perception, object detection, and navigation (YOLOv5 and ResNet architectures). These systems improved safety and reduced idling times in controlled environments by an average of 9%.
Smart Warehousing: Enabled by IoT sensors and AI control systems using reinforcement learning for climate and lighting optimization, leading to energy savings of 8–15% across warehouses.
The diversity of AI applications demonstrates that while the functional goals—energy efficiency, reduced CO2 emissions, and improved delivery performance—are shared, the underlying architectures vary significantly. This diversity also suggests opportunities for comparative studies to determine which AI approaches yield optimal results under specific urban conditions.
Three performance indicators reflect the results of AI integration in Figure 4 by showing delivery time reduction in minutes, along with service accuracy in percentages and fulfillment percentage among sixteen organizations. Huawei UAE achieved the most significant delivery time cut of more than twenty minutes per shipment because of its advanced real-time route optimization systems. The success of Zayed University and University of Dubai easily matched typical logistics companies as they achieved delivery time shortening by more than 15 min and fulfillment levels that approached 98 percent. The study indicates that collaborative innovation, along with applied research, produces operational gains.
DHL maintained an outstanding performance by achieving order accuracy above 94% and fulfilling over 96% of requests, which stems from its advanced presence in AI-driven supply chain and parcel tracking capabilities. Careem Logistics achieved stable results throughout their delivery operations by maintaining high fulfillment numbers together with steady order accuracy performance metrics. RTA Dubai was investigated, which showed that their average delivery time shortened by more than 16 min because of public sector integration with AI technology for enhancing urban mobility coordination.
Both DEWA and the Ministry of Energy achieved remarkable fulfillment and accuracy scores, although logistics did not maintain a primary status in their sectors. Public institutions now demonstrate that AI solutions extend beyond private logistics operators, since these solutions bring value to the management of energy, mobility, and sustainability goals.
Figure 4 shows that Dubai’s logistics performance domain improves consistently after implementing AI technologies into its infrastructure systems. Dubai serves as an exemplary leader for urban supply chain evolution because it merges operational data networks with digital governance and AI technological advancement.

4.2. Energy Efficiency Outcomes

Analysis shows that AI adoption creates direct links to increased energy-saving results within the urban logistics framework of Dubai. Real-time fleet analytics together with dynamic route optimization and autonomous dispatching systems within actively implementing organizations show measurable results for emission reduction and better fuel economy, according to both interviews and secondary data.
Three primary indicators including CO2 emissions reduction (kg/month), energy savings (%) and fuel efficiency improvement (%) appear in Figure 5, through comparison by significant public and private stakeholders. The analyzed organizations achieved collective energy savings of 17.3%, but specific cases reached more than 24% energy reduction such as RTA Dubai and UAEU. The savings were made possible because of AI instruments for scheduling operations and traffic pattern forecasting mechanisms. Most organizations achieved fuel efficiency improvements between 10% and 18% while Huawei UAE and DEWA and IBM MENA maintained efficiency rates exceeding 15%. Vehicle routing mechanisms with adaptive ability and automated fuel monitoring systems allowed organizations to cut down idle time duration and achieve better driving outcomes through intelligent performance enhancements.
CO2 emissions assessments reveal the most prominent effects on the environment. The collected data indicates that organizations reduced their CO2 monthly emissions by 259.4 kg independently, and pioneering companies reached approximately 500 kg each month. These achievements showcase how AI implementation gives organizations two major benefits, which support operational excellence improvements while helping the UAE fulfill its sustainability objectives and emissions reduction mandates.
Information technologies aimed at saving energy have applied their concepts to warehouse facilities. The implementation of AI-controlled systems for lighting and HVAC functions in smart warehouses demonstrates early results during interviews that show energy conservation between 8% and 15% across the whole sector.
Figure 5 illustrates that AI now stands at the heart of urban logistics development, which supports sustainable logistics advancement and the construction of a scalable efficient infrastructure for Dubai’s smart city goals.

4.3. Simulation Results: Projecting the Impact of AI-Driven Optimization

To validate empirical findings and assess the scalability of AI-based logistics systems, a discrete-event simulation model was developed. The objective of this simulation was to replicate urban delivery operations under AI-optimized and conventional conditions, and forecast performance improvements in a controlled environment.
The simulated delivery scenario represented a typical last-mile logistics cycle in an urban setting, using five delivery vehicles operating over a continuous time horizon of 1000 min. Delivery parameters included a standard service time of 20 min per stop, realistic traffic patterns, and route allocations based on historical data. AI-enhanced vehicles applied real-time route optimization, predictive traffic analysis, and dynamic scheduling, reducing average delivery time per stop to approximately 17 min, compared to the baseline of 20 min.
Table 2 summarizes the outcomes: each AI-enabled vehicle completed 58 to 59 deliveries, maintaining an average delivery time of 17.0 to 17.2 min, with minimal variation in total operation time. These results align with the empirical findings from stakeholders such as Aramex, RTA Dubai, and Huawei UAE, where AI deployment demonstrated quantifiable reductions in delivery duration and improvements in fleet utilization.
To ensure the realism and reliability of the simulation results, the model was parameterized and validated using actual operational data from three logistics providers—Aramex, RTA Dubai, and Huawei UAE. Key input parameters such as average delivery times, fuel consumption rates, and stop durations were directly sourced from these organizations’ performance records. In addition to the baseline simulation, we modeled an alternative high-demand congestion scenario to test system robustness under heavier traffic conditions and increased delivery volumes. The results showed that AI-driven optimization retained significant performance advantages, achieving a delivery time reduction of approximately 13% compared to the non-AI baseline, even in congested network conditions.
Figure 6 presents the architecture and logic of the simulation model used in this study. It visualizes the workflow, input parameters, and functional modules of the AI-driven logistics system as modeled in the simulation environment.
Key components of Figure 6 include:
  • Input Layer:
    • Vehicle parameters: Fleet size, speed ranges, and service times.
    • Delivery nodes: Geographic points representing customer locations.
    • Traffic variables: Dynamic congestion levels based on time of day.
  • AI-driven Optimization Layer:
    • Route Planning Module: Uses predictive algorithms to assign optimal routes.
    • Dispatch Scheduling: Adjusts dispatch times dynamically to minimize idle time.
    • Traffic Forecasting Engine: Integrates historical and simulated real-time traffic data.
  • Operational Logic Layer:
    • Simulates vehicle movement, stop time, loading/unloading, and route deviations.
    • Monitors total delivery count, energy usage, and total delivery cycle time.
  • Output Dashboard:
    • Generates performance metrics such as delivery time, fuel use, and vehicle utilization.
    • Compares AI-optimized outputs with baseline (non-AI) scenario results.
This architecture allowed the simulation to mirror the actual logistics workflows found in Dubai’s urban logistics environment, while also allowing for parameter variation to test scalability under different load and traffic conditions.
The simulation results demonstrate that AI-driven optimization achieves substantial improvements in urban logistics performance. The 17 min average delivery time confirms earlier KPI results observed in field data, showing consistency between real-world deployment and modeled projections. Additionally, the simulation verifies the scalability of AI logistics tools—suggesting that larger fleets or higher delivery volumes would continue to benefit from time and energy efficiencies.
These results reinforce the argument that AI, when integrated into urban delivery networks, not only improves current logistics performance but also offers a sustainable, scalable path forward for smart city development. Simulation modeling thus serves as both a validation mechanism and a strategic forecasting tool for policymakers and logistics firms considering broader AI implementation.

4.4. Challenges and Enablers

Dubai’s urban logistics sector confronts multiple enduring difficulties when it expands AI usage in its operations despite producing positive results. Numerous interview and document assessments and secondary data findings presented this information. Table 3 summarizes how various organizations within multiple sectors include their AI technology choices with their encountered barriers and enabling factors for deployment.
The main obstacle repeatedly occurred during implementation, because AI technologies proved difficult to integrate into legacy systems that already existed. Aramex, together with Careem, along with RTA Dubai, struggled with substantial delays and higher costs following their shift from conventional routing systems to AI-based dynamic scheduling platforms. The integration process for Huawei UAE became complicated due to difficulties achieved when they introduced IoT platforms into their logistics workflows because operational silos blocked data-sharing between departments.
Insufficient knowledge and experience in AI methods emerged as a main obstacle for mid-sized logistics firms and public-sector organizations. The insufficient presence of technical experts at DHL and Dubai Future Foundation required both organizations to depend on outside technology providers in the long term. The skill deficit created dual problems by slowing down innovation efforts within organizations by raising total operational expense levels. The high financial expenses involving proprietary AI architectures and training platforms at Zayed University together with UAEU created significant obstacles for widespread implementation.
The issues of data-protection and data-sharing connections repeatedly surfaced as main concerns from stakeholders dealing with smart urban development and public service functions. Smart Dubai and the Dubai Carbon Centre stated that their disconnected data domains prevented seamless AI system integration because their different departments and service providers did not function well together. Decisions about data sharing within or across platforms became unclear because of regulatory ambiguity, which extended the amount of time needed for implementation.
Multiple important enablers surfaced in the different sectors despite the impediments. Public–private partnerships became the principal enabler that reduced financial and technical risks throughout the process. The global AI partners of Aramex gave the company the opportunity to utilize real-time dynamic scheduling algorithms. IBM MENA and UAEU listed government-supported collaboration structures as essential to obtaining advanced AI models for logistics-forecasting activities.
The vital enabler for success came through strategic compliance with government policy frameworks including Dubai’s Clean Energy Strategy 2050 and Smart Dubai 2021 Vision. The policy instruments received endorsement from more than seventy percent of interviewees as essential components which delivered financial advantages and institutional credibility to their operations. Aligning their operations with government policy frameworks allowed Huawei UAE, along with DEWA and the Ministry of Energy, to obtain funding for test initiatives while boosting their internal readiness for AI adoption.
The expansion of Dubai’s digital ecosystem proved essential for propelling AI deployment due to readiness factors in infrastructure development. RTA Dubai, along with the Dubai Carbon Centre, used new smart platforms built by Dubai to expedite AI deployment while decreasing maintenance expenses.
The analysis shows that AI functions as an unconditional driver for urban logistics operational optimization, while energy efficiency depends heavily on ready organizations and clear regulations. The results of the interviews reflected the following few common themes among the respondents representing the logistic companies, the government, and technology hardware providers. The top-rated integration challenges were identified, especially in relation to the interoperability of AI solutions with the rest of current legacy systems. One operations manager of one of the leading logistics companies regarded the largest barrier to be the following: “It was not the AI itself but making it work with our 15 year old fleet management software.” Such a feeling was shared by various stakeholders in the private industry, as they reiterated the issue of legacy infrastructure and data formats being an impediment to the scale-up of AI-powered solutions.
Another major issue was the shortage of skills, primarily when they had to possess expertise in AI as well as be highly motivated in logistics. Some of the interviewees stated that although AI vendors offered basic support on the implementation, the internal teams lacked the maintenance, troubleshooting, and adapting capabilities of the systems over an extended period. Conversely, the policy enablers have always been emphasized by representatives of the public sector. Smart programs like Smart Dubai, which are funded and spearheaded by the government, were mentioned as the main driving force behind the adoption of AI. A policy advisor at Smart Dubai was quoted as saying, “Without city-level logistics data management system, each of the operators is finding ways to optimize in a vacuum where its benefits are constrained in its effects on congestion and emissions.” This is an example that demonstrates the necessity of (1) common infrastructure and (2) data governance to make the most of AI. In the interviews, it was also indicated that there is a difference in view between public sector stakeholders and private sector stakeholders. At the public agency level, the trend was to take a policy-based approach to issues of interoperability, targets in terms of sustainability, and a long-term view of resilience. The vital difference, however, lay in the fact that the thinking of the private operators was focused on a return-on-investment (ROI) orientation, and it was based on cost-saving, speed to the market, and points of competitive differentiation. The mismatch raises the significance of integrated governance systems that strike the balance between business and city-wide sustainability goals. Table 1 presents essential insights which demonstrate the comprehensive mechanics that influence AI deployment in Dubai’s logistics and smart mobility framework.

5. Discussion

The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) within Dubai’s urban logistics landscape has become a core factor that drives increased operational effectiveness together with environmental stewardship, in addition to strengthening alignment between innovative city development and the urban development plan. Section 4.1 demonstrates how logic operators, smart cities, technology vendors, and logistics providers put AI tools together dynamically, including sensors, scheduling, and routing technology. Various smart technologies generate quantifiable advantages, which enhance power utilization while boosting distribution effectiveness and decreasing emissions of greenhouse effect compounds.
All results presented in Section 4.2 provide evidence to support this conclusion. Organizations which adopted AI systems accrued on average 17.3% in energy savings, and achieved 13.9% better fuel efficiency, and each organization cut CO2 emissions by 259.4 kg per month. The visual depiction in Figure 3 portrays the substantial improvements that took place across various business sectors. The successful outcomes validate AI technology use for urban energy efficiency enhancement along with its alignment with Dubai’s Smart Dubai 2021 Vision and Clean Energy Strategy 2050. Simulation outcomes were confirmed by previous empirical evidence by demonstrating that AI achieves a 15% decrease in final delivery times, together with a nearly 20% rise in movements within a 1000 min cycle. This simulation made real-world key performance indicators more reliable, while predicting AI scalability potential in equivalent urban delivery networks.
Section 4.4 shows how the general implementation of AI technologies in logistics faces various essential barriers against complete deployment. The main challenge stems from the technical problem of AI integration into old systems that occur mainly in organizations without distinct digital transformation plans. Small logistics companies, together with government departments, face significant skill shortages because they lack adequate personnel with expertise in AI, data analysis, and system harmonization. Different organizations have installed isolated AI solutions because they lack common interoperability protocols which prevent collective information sharing. Smart Dubai and Ministry of Energy employees shared positive views about AI’s long-term applications, while stressing the necessity of implementing a unified logistic data system across the city to support between-sector instant decision making.
Several powerful enablers within the system form an excellent environment that supports the scalability of AI applications. The current implementation of public–private partnerships enhances the speed of pilot deployments and cuts down expenses while removing technological entry hurdles. The collaboration between Huawei and Fetchr resulted in the quick development of sensor networks together with dynamic routing platforms. The UAE government has brought about enhanced AI adoption through its support mechanisms, which include strategic alliances with programs like the Dubai Autonomous Transportation Strategy together with incentive-based measures.
Table 2 combines sectoral assessments of the AI drivers and barriers by showing the different AI tools employed while demonstrating what factors enabled their success. The success factors behind AI adoption in the sector consist of ready digital systems, adaptable regulations, and specific funding for innovative programs. Multiple organizations’ experiences show leadership dedication and organizational flexibility to be fundamental elements that lead to successful AI implementation. Research reveals that the advancement of AI adoption in Dubai’s logistics framework needs a multi-dimensional strategy to maintain continuous growth. Organizations need to invest in talent development while they fix technical problems alongside developing governance systems for interoperability to develop an innovative workplace culture. The role of policymakers becomes essential because they need to support standardization efforts, as well as create incentives for collaborative AI systems and maintain energy optimization as a combined public–private initiative.
Comparative evidence from Singapore [45], Oslo [24], and Amsterdam [27,63] confirms the viability of AI-enabled logistics in diverse urban contexts. While Singapore emphasizes multimodal optimization, Oslo’s focus lies in electric vehicle routing [42] and Amsterdam leverages consolidation centers [64]. Dubai’s model shares these objectives but also reflects unique governance and infrastructure conditions, supported by strong public–private partnerships [65,66]. The literature further suggests that digital infrastructure readiness, data interoperability, and cross-sectoral collaboration are essential for scaling AI-driven energy optimization [33,67].
AI has two major impacts on logistics operations by reshaping their nature while becoming a fundamental element of Dubai’s smart city development. The everyday operational capability to improve energy usage alongside emission reduction and service delivery excellence makes artificial intelligence an essential resource for sustainable urban development. The complete effectiveness of these insights requires combined investments between technological advancements and policy formation, together with human resources development.
Although the current research aims at describing the existing applications of AI, specifically, predictive routing and dynamic scheduling, future research studies should consider comparative analysis of various AI approaches, including reinforcement learning, genetic algorithms, and deep neural networks, to find out which of them is more effective in meeting energy and operational optimization needs. This kind of comparison would reveal tradeoffs in terms of performance, as well as identify which AI tools are most scalable and cost-effective in certain urban situations.
Figure 7 presents a conceptual model of AI-driven energy optimization in urban logistics, developed from empirical findings, simulation results, and literature synthesis in this study. The model captures four interlinked dimensions. First, AI inputs—such as predictive routing, dynamic scheduling, IoT monitoring, autonomous systems, and smart warehousing—serve as the technological drivers of transformation. These inputs are applied within urban logistics processes, including fleet management, last-mile delivery, and warehouse operations, which represent the operational domains where AI applications are deployed. From these applications, measurable sustainability outcomes emerge in the form of reduced CO2 emissions, improved fuel efficiency, and overall energy savings. The model also incorporates the influence of enablers and barriers, such as supportive policy, workforce skills, infrastructure readiness, and data governance, which collectively shape the effectiveness and scalability of AI adoption. Overall, the model underscores that AI technologies do not operate in isolation but within a broader socio-technical ecosystem, where success in achieving energy optimization depends on aligning technological capabilities with institutional enablers while proactively mitigating the impact of structural and operational barriers.

6. Policy and Strategic Recommendations

To establish AI-driven energy optimization in Dubai’s urban logistics environment, a strategic road map should be built using findings from this study that address institutional and technological requirements along with regulatory aspects. The following recommendations adopt both implementation mechanisms and organizational changes that will allow large-scale AI system integration throughout different sectors.

6.1. Strengthening AI-Readiness Across the Logistics Sector

The data shows that insufficient internal capabilities stand as one of the main obstacles to AI adoption among mostly small and medium-sized logistics companies. To close this skill deficit, policymakers must establish specific capacity-building initiatives which develop technological capability along with leadership abilities. The public sector should create training investments for AI literacy, digital logistics operations, and data science through collaborative educational initiatives, as well as cost-reduced certification programs and AI bootcamps for logistics professionals. There are multiple planned initiatives that aim to build key abilities within operational teams and decision making staff for maintaining AI-powered development and implementation.

6.2. Promoting Open Data Standards and Interoperability

Multiple government institutions, together with private organizations, have identified the absolute necessity for interoperable data systems through their collaborative research studies. The existing system disconnections prevent the widespread implementation of real-time AI capabilities, along with scalable intelligent systems. Smart Dubai and comparable government entities need to create open data standards for urban freight that enable the secure exchange of privacy-protected data across logistics operators, alongside public agencies and AI providers. An Urban Logistics Data Hub should serve as a central platform for AI systems to obtain non-identifiable information about traffic movements and delivery operations, in addition to vehicle pathways and energy expenditures. Through this central hub, users could optimize their supply chain routes alongside performing future delivery projections and generating energy-efficiency optimization across the entire system.

6.3. Incentivizing Green AI Solutions

Since AI implementations deliver proven energy savings and emission cuts (as proven by DEWA, Derq and UAEU) policymakers need to establish programs that give benefits for positive environmental results. These could include the following:
  • Logistics firms can apply for green technology grants when implementing AI systems that prove energy efficiency.
  • Consumers should receive tax benefits which directly link to verified reductions in carbon dioxide emissions through standardized auditing processes.
  • The establishment of Smart Logistics Awards serves as an award platform to identify leading AI-based sustainable practices for wider implementation.
These rewards serve to intertwine private sector innovation efforts with the goals of achieving Net Zero by 2050 in Dubai and accelerate trial activities for energy-intensive logistics programs.

6.4. Enhancing Public–Private Collaboration for Innovation

The evaluation shows that public–private partnerships helped many successful projects occur because they created mutual risk sharing and resource pooling opportunities. The creation of an Urban Logistics Innovation Consortium based on stakeholders from government and technology vendors, academic institutions with logistics operators should become new policy measures to formalize these partnerships. The strategic body would manage pilot testing as well as share funding for AI energy-optimization development and utilize obtained outcomes to create policies with scalability in mind.

6.5. Integrating AI into Urban Logistics Policy and Planning

AI needs formal status as an essential component in the urban logistics strategy of Dubai. AI-based modeling tools need to become a standard part of infrastructure planning and transport management as well as freight zoning activities conducted by city planners and transport regulators. AI needs regulatory frameworks which will actively include performance standards and AI mandates in logistics licensing systems, urban development guidelines, and public procurement methods. The revision of strategic documents like Dubai’s Smart Mobility 2030 alongside Clean Energy Strategy 2050 should establish AI as the essential tool for attaining system-wide enhancements in urban mobility energy efficiency and resilience.
Besides AI integration, the application of Vehicle-to-Everything (V2X) communication becomes the potential frontier in terms of performance improvement in urban logistics. Providing real-time communication in vehicles, infrastructure, and control systems, V2X can enhance traffic flow, delivery coordination, and safety. The V2X technologies would initiate more fuel saving and time savings, particularly in areas of traffic congestion, when used in conjunction with the AI-based routing and scheduling. The implementation of AI and V2X in future smart city planning should entail synergizing them with a holistic form of digital mobility frameworks.
Policy frameworks for AI in urban SCM should integrate ethical AI guidelines [49,68] and data protection measures aligned with GDPR and UAE laws [69]. Algorithmic transparency and bias auditing [70,71] can help mitigate the risks of discriminatory or privacy-compromising AI outputs. Investments in workforce reskilling [60] and digital skills [46] are critical for sustainable adoption. Interoperability initiatives, such as shared APIs and standardized data formats, have been successfully demonstrated in EU smart city programs [31,33], providing a model for Dubai’s continued evolution toward integrated, AI-driven logistics.

6.6. Ethical and Social Considerations

Although the optimization involving the use of AI proves to be operationally and environmentally beneficial, the potential mass adoption of the technology in the urban logistics field poses critical ethical and social issues that should not be disregarded in the context of policies and implementation plans.

6.6.1. Automation and Employment

The growing adoption of AI-powered automation technology, such as self-driving delivery cars, dynamic rosters and warehouse robots, could push out some forms of low-skill and repetitive work in delivery and logistics. Nevertheless, automation, as efficient and cost reducing as it may sound, might bring about employment imbalance in the case of incautious use. Policymakers and stakeholders in the industry ought to shape reskilling and upskilling workforce interventions that assist them in being ready to face the new job positions in AI surveillance, system assistance, and digital logistics coordination. Public–private partnerships have a very important role in ensuring the provision of such training.

6.6.2. Bias in AI Systems

Routing and allocation algorithms performed with AI can transfer or create biases inherent in training data, so that drivers, customers, or service locations are treated differently. As an illustration, gender or demographic prejudice can be applied to the task allocation, route assignment, or service prioritization. To overcome these risks, logistics operators are advised to conduct fairness auditing procedures as a component of AI lifecycle management. This will consist in periodic detection of bias, transparency of algorithms, and their rectification to provide equal distribution of services and adherence to ethical principles of AI.

6.6.3. Data Privacy

AI logistics operation depends on big batches of personal, vehicle, and operational information that can comprise the history of the locations, customer data, and sensor-based data associated with the vehicle and warehouses. This information can be abused or accessed without the authorization of anyone with in-place stringent protection measures. Privacy- by-design measures (such as data anonymization, encryption and robust access controls) should, thus, be included in all AI implementations. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and UAE data protection laws should be obligatory with their observation to be checked through periodic audits. Explicit data subject consent and open declaration of application of the data might further enhance the confidence of the populace.

7. Conclusions

This paper discussed the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in optimizing energy in urban logistics with Dubai as a state-of-the-art smart city. The research indicated that a mixed-methods methodology including performance indicators, stakeholder interviews, and policy analysis allowed for us to show the significant shift in energy efficiency and operational performance where AI technologies, including dynamic routing, IoT monitoring, and predictive scheduling were involved in the sphere of supply chain management.
The key results show that because of AI integration, a significant energy cost decrease became observed (17.3% monthly on average), the fuel efficiency increased by 13.9%, and the emission of CO2 per month decreased by nearly 259.4 kg per organization. Such results are satisfying, concerning strategic goals promoting sustainability in Dubai through the Clean Energy Strategy 2050 and Smart Dubai, which proves that AI plays a significant role in realizing sustainability.
Systemic challenges persist although these gains have been achieved. In organizations, there are problems with technological integration, lack of skill clarity among the workforce, and data governance. The elimination of the barriers implies collaboration involving different sectors, such as standard data frameworks, talent building, and government incentives.
Dwelling on the future of the area of study, the paper singles out three strategic directions of future research and policymaking:
  • Scalability and Replicability: The experience of Dubai is relevant to other smart cities, especially within the GCC, Asia and Europe, aiming to implement AI to logistics sustainability.
  • Integration of Policy: The incorporation of AI in the city planning and logistics policy could fast-track the digital transition and environment-related outcomes.
  • International Partnerships: The cross-city learning and international cooperation, (such as cities like Singapore and Oslo), can support innovation ecosystems to a greater extent and increase the worldwide energy-efficiency objectives.
Finally, AI is not to be simply considered as a technological boost, but as a strategic infrastructure facilitator redefining the logistics in cities. Properly governed, capacity-built, and collaborated models could enable cities with strategic utilization of AI to have the potential to develop sustainable and intelligent supply chains.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.M.M. and M.M.; methodology, B.M.M.; software, M.M.; validation, B.M.M. and M.M.; formal analysis, B.M.M.; investigation, B.M.M.; resources, M.M.; data curation, B.M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, B.M.M.; writing—review and editing, M.M.; visualization, M.M.; supervision, B.M.M.; project administration, B.M.M.; funding acquisition, M.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study is waived for ethical review as non-interventional interviews with adults, non-identifiable data and minimal risk by Ethical Committee of Emirates Aviation University.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. World Economic Forum. The Future of the Last-Mile Ecosystem. 2020. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/publications/the-future-of-the-last-mile-ecosystem/ (accessed on 10 June 2025).
  2. Alketbi, A.; Nasir, Q.; Trad, A. Smart city transformation in the UAE: Challenges and opportunities. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2020, 11, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. DEWA. Dubai Clean Energy Strategy 2050. Dubai Electricity and Water Authority. 2021. Available online: https://www.dewa.gov.ae (accessed on 5 June 2025).
  4. Smart Dubai. Smart Dubai Strategic Plan 2021. Smart Dubai Office. 2020. Available online: https://www.smartdubai.ae (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  5. Fan, Y.; Xu, C.; Zhou, H. Energy-efficient logistics using AI: A review and future directions. Energy Rep. 2021, 7, 865–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Shah, N.; Shukla, A.; Jain, R. Role of AI in Supply Chain Energy Optimization: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 368, 133000. [Google Scholar]
  7. Min, H. Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: Theory and applications. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2010, 13, 13–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Carbonneau, R.; Laframboise, K.; Vahidov, R. Application of machine learning techniques for supply chain demand forecasting. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 184, 1140–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mohsen, B.M. Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Supply Chain Management Performance. J. Serv. Sci. Manag. 2023, 16, 44–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chen, J.; Li, K.X.; Yang, Z. A deep learning framework for last-mile delivery optimization. Transp. Res. Part E 2021, 148, 102270. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, Y.; Wu, H.; Zhang, C. Reinforcement learning for real-time logistics and transportation routing. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 140165–140177. [Google Scholar]
  12. Lee, J.; Kao, H.A.; Yang, S. Service innovation and smart analytics for Industry 4.0 and big data environment. Procedia CIRP 2020, 52, 3–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wamba, S.F.; Queiroz, M.M.; Trinchera, L. Dynamics between AI, SCM, and firm performance. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2022, 42, 431–452. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pereira, C.R.; Da Silva, A.L.; Frazzon, E.M. Hybrid simulation in logistics using AI. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 139, 106175. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dubey, R.; Gunasekaran, A.; Bryde, D.J.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Papadopoulos, T. Blockchain technology for enhancing swift-trust, collaboration and resilience within a humanitarian supply chain setting. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 3381–3398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Choudhury, R.; Agrawal, M.; Dey, L. Drones in last-mile logistics: Optimization and regulatory challenges. Transp. Res. Part C 2021, 130, 103263. [Google Scholar]
  17. Tjahjono, B.; Esplugues, C.; Ares, E.; Pelaez, G. What does Industry 4.0 mean to supply chain? Procedia Manuf. 2017, 13, 1175–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Van Duin, R.; Quak, H.; Muñuzuri, J. New challenges for urban consolidation centres: A case study in the Netherlands. Transp. Res. Procedia 2016, 12, 357–369. [Google Scholar]
  19. Mohsen, B.M. AI-Driven Optimization of Urban Logistics in Smart Cities: Integrating Autonomous Vehicles and IoT for Efficient Delivery Systems. Sustainability 2024, 16, 11265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Fu, Y.; Zhong, R.; Luo, H. Artificial intelligence for sustainable cold chain logistics: A review and future directions. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 285, 124998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Sun, W.; Hu, J. Energy-saving in intelligent warehouse systems using AI-enabled control: Case studies and trends. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2020, 17, 1908–1918. [Google Scholar]
  22. He, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yu, H. Intelligent cold chain logistics for energy optimization: AI applications and challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 319, 128682. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mladenow, A.; Bauer, C.; Strauss, C. Crowdsourcing in logistics: An AI-enabled business model for urban last-mile delivery. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2016, 98, 705–710. [Google Scholar]
  24. Anand, N.; van Duin, R. Urban freight and energy policy: Role of AI. Transp. Policy 2021, 100, 82–91. [Google Scholar]
  25. Sethi, P.; Manikandan, S.; Garg, A. Blockchain and AI for sustainable logistics: A framework. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 32, 418–429. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dolgui, A.; Ivanov, D.; Sokolov, B. Simulation-based optimization in supply chain networks. Annu. Rev. Control 2020, 50, 220–232. [Google Scholar]
  27. Taniguchi, E.; Thompson, R.G.; Yamada, T. Recent trends and innovations in modelling city logistics. Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 125, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kitchin, R. The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism. GeoJournal 2015, 79, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mohsen, B.M. Role of Big Data in Supply Chain Management. Int. J. Manag. 2022, 13, 24–40. [Google Scholar]
  30. Alonso, B.; Barreda, A.; Córdoba, M. Smart cities and AI: Transportation challenges and trends. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 172, 121022. [Google Scholar]
  31. Batty, M.; Axhausen, K.W.; Giannotti, F.; Pozdnoukhov, A.; Bazzani, A.; Wachowicz, M.; Ouzounis, G.; Portugali, Y. Smart cities of the future. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2012, 214, 481–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Awasthi, A.; Chauhan, S.S. A hybrid approach integrating AI for logistics environmental performance. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 342–352. [Google Scholar]
  33. Pan, S.; Zhang, D.; Vasilakos, A.V. AI-enabled urban logistics for sustainable smart cities. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2022, 23, 16408–16420. [Google Scholar]
  34. Shanker, K.; Pathak, D.; Luthra, S. Leveraging AI in logistics: Pathways for achieving Net Zero. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 384, 135627. [Google Scholar]
  35. Mohsen, B.M. Developments of Digital Technologies Related to Supply Chain Management. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2023, 220, 788–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bostrom, R.P.; Heinen, J.S. MIS problems and failures: A socio-technical perspective. MIS Q. 1977, 1, 17–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Barney, J. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 1991, 17, 99–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Seuring, S.; Müller, M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1699–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mohsen, B.M. Global Perspective of Digitization and Innovation in Shipping Industry. Int. J. Manag. Stud. Res. (IJMSR) 2022, 10, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nazari, M.; Oroojlooy, A.; Snyder, L.V.; Takáč, M. Reinforcement learning for solving the vehicle routing problem. NeurIPS 2018, 2018, 9839–9849. [Google Scholar]
  41. Macrina, G.; Pugliese, L.D.P.; Guerriero, F.; Laporte, G. The green mixed fleet vehicle routing problem with partial battery recharging and time windows. Transp. Res. Part C 2020, 120, 102762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Qian, Z.S.; Lin, D. Robust optimization of electric vehicle charging schedules in urban transportation networks. Transp. Res. Part C 2020, 112, 220–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Fahimnia, B.; Sarkis, J.; Davarzani, H. Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 162, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Crainic, T.G.; Perboli, G.; Rosano, M. Simulation of intermodal freight transportation systems: A taxonomy. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2018, 270, 401–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chong, A.Y.L.; Li, B.; Ngai, E.; Ch’ng, E.; Lee, F. Predictive analytics for smart city logistics. Decis. Support Syst. 2021, 144, 113516. [Google Scholar]
  46. Ben-Daya, M.; Hassini, E.; Bahroun, Z. Internet of things and supply chain management: A literature review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 4719–4742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. He, W.; Xu, L.D.; Shull, R.D. Smart city energy optimization with IoT-enabled AI. IEEE Internet Things J. 2021, 8, 3736–3746. [Google Scholar]
  48. Queiroz, M.M.; Wamba, S.F.; Queiroz, T.A. Blockchain adoption in supply chain management: Empirical evidence from an emerging economy. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 232, 107927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jobin, A.; Ienca, M.; Vayena, E. The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2019, 1, 389–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kitchin, R. Making sense of smart cities: Addressing present shortcomings. Camb. J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 2015, 8, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Creswell, J.W.; Plano Clark, V.L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 3rd ed.; SAGE Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  52. Creswell, J.W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 4th ed.; SAGE Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  53. Tashakkori, A.; Teddlie, C. Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  54. Saunders, M.; Lewis, P.; Thornhill, A. Research Methods for Business Students, 8th ed.; Pearson Education: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  55. Papadopoulos, T.; Gunasekaran, A.; Dubey, R.; Altay, N.; Childe, S.J.; Fosso-Wamba, S. The role of big data in explaining disaster resilience in supply chains for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 1108–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Calvet, L.; de Armas, J.; Masip, D.; Juan, A.A. Solving the vehicle routing problem with backhauls via the VRP with simultaneous deliveries and pickups. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 2016, 67, 977–991. [Google Scholar]
  57. Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A.; Sokolov, B. The impact of digital technology on supply chain resilience. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  58. van Heeswijk, W.J.A.; Mes, M.R.K.; Schutten, J.M.J. The delivery dispatching problem with time windows for urban consolidation centers. Transp. Sci. 2019, 53, 203–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gkiotsalitis, K.; Cats, O. Public transport planning adaption under the COVID-19 pandemic crisis: Literature review of research needs and directions. Transp. Rev. 2021, 41, 374–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Tortorella, G.L.; Narayanamurthy, G.; Thurer, M. Lean manufacturing implementation: Contextual factors and performance outcomes in developing countries. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 1554–1572. [Google Scholar]
  61. Yin, R.K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed.; SAGE Publications: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  62. Seuring, S.; Gold, S. Conducting content-analysis based literature reviews in supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2012, 17, 544–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. van Rooijen, T.; Quak, H. City logistics in the European CIVITAS initiative. Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 125, 312–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Govindan, K.; Rajeev, A.; Padhi, S.S.; Pati, R.K. Supply chain sustainability and performance: A bibliometric analysis. Transp. Res. Part E 2020, 137, 101857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Wamba, S.F.; Queiroz, M.M.; Trinchera, L. The role of artificial intelligence-enabled dynamic capability on environmental performance: The mediation effect of a data-driven culture in France and the USA. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2024, 268, 109131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Evangelista, P.; Santoro, L.; Thomas, A. Environmental sustainability in third-party logistics service providers: A systematic literature review from 2000–2016. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Moura, L.; Leiras, A.; Yoshizaki, H.T.Y. Sustainability in humanitarian supply chain: A systematic literature review. Ann. Oper. Res. 2020, 290, 343–365. [Google Scholar]
  68. Shneiderman, B. Bridging the gap between ethics and practice: Guidelines for reliable, safe, and trustworthy human-centered AI systems. ACM Trans. Interact. Intell. Syst. 2020, 10, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Cath, C.; Wachter, S.; Mittelstadt, B.; Taddeo, M.; Floridi, L. Artificial intelligence and the ‘good society’: The US, EU, and UK approach. Sci. Eng. Ethics 2018, 24, 505–528. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  70. Zeng, Y.; Lu, E.H.-C.; Li, T.; Yu, Z.; Guo, B. Fairness-aware AI in smart cities: Conceptions, progress and challenges. Inf. Fusion 2022, 79, 165–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kamble, S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Dhone, N.C. Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing practices for sustainable organizational performance in Indian manufacturing companies. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 58, 1319–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sequential explanatory mixed-methods framework for assessing AI-driven energy optimization in Dubai’s urban logistics.
Figure 1. Sequential explanatory mixed-methods framework for assessing AI-driven energy optimization in Dubai’s urban logistics.
Sustainability 17 08301 g001
Figure 2. Data Sources and Collection.
Figure 2. Data Sources and Collection.
Sustainability 17 08301 g002
Figure 3. Data Analysis Framework.
Figure 3. Data Analysis Framework.
Sustainability 17 08301 g003
Figure 4. Comparative performance of key urban logistics stakeholders in Dubai.
Figure 4. Comparative performance of key urban logistics stakeholders in Dubai.
Sustainability 17 08301 g004
Figure 5. Comparative analysis of energy efficiency outcomes across key organizations in Dubai.
Figure 5. Comparative analysis of energy efficiency outcomes across key organizations in Dubai.
Sustainability 17 08301 g005
Figure 6. Simulation Structure.
Figure 6. Simulation Structure.
Sustainability 17 08301 g006
Figure 7. Conceptual model of AI-driven energy optimization in urban logistics.
Figure 7. Conceptual model of AI-driven energy optimization in urban logistics.
Sustainability 17 08301 g007
Table 1. Summary of Related Works in AI-Driven Urban Logistics and Energy Optimization.
Table 1. Summary of Related Works in AI-Driven Urban Logistics and Energy Optimization.
Author(s) and YearFocus AreaMethodologyKey FindingsRelevance to Current Study
Chong et al. (2021) [45]AI for traffic prediction and fleet optimization in smart citiesPredictive analytics, case studyAI-based traffic control reduces congestion and delivery times in SingaporeProvides a benchmark for AI logistics in advanced urban environments
Anand and van Duin (2021) [24]Electric vehicle routing optimization in OsloSimulation modelingAI-enabled EV routing reduces CO2 emissions by 15%Illustrates AI’s role in integrating clean energy with logistics
Nazari et al. (2018) [40]Reinforcement learning for vehicle routingDeep RL algorithmsImproved routing efficiency by up to 20%Supports the inclusion of AI algorithm-level detail in urban logistics
Macrina et al. (2020) [41]Green mixed-fleet vehicle routing with battery rechargingMathematical optimizationReduced operational costs and emissions simultaneouslyDemonstrates hybrid AI-OR approach applicability
Ben-Daya et al. (2019) [46]IoT integration in supply chain managementLiterature reviewIoT improves real-time monitoring and predictive maintenanceSupports AI-IoT integration in Dubai case
He et al. (2021)
[47]
AI for smart energy management in urban transportIoT + AI frameworkOptimized energy use in connected transport networksValidates AI’s role in energy optimization
Queiroz et al. (2019) [48]Blockchain adoption in SCMEmpirical surveyEnhances trust and transparency in logisticsSupports secure data governance for AI systems
Sethi et al. (2022) [25]Blockchain-AI integration in logisticsConceptual frameworkEnables interoperability and secure AI deploymentRelevant to policy and governance implications
Taniguchi et al. (2014) [27]City logistics modeling innovationsModeling reviewPromotes consolidation centers and shared logistics platformsAligns with Dubai’s infrastructure-driven approach
Wamba et al. (2022) [13]Big data analytics in supply chain performanceEmpirical analysisBDA capabilities enhance operational efficiencyReinforces data-driven AI logistics strategies
Table 2. Simulation Summary: AI-Optimized Logistics Scenario.
Table 2. Simulation Summary: AI-Optimized Logistics Scenario.
VehicleDeliveries MadeAverage Delivery Time (min)Total Time Spent (min)
Vehicle_15817.2997.6
Vehicle_25917.01003.0
Vehicle_35817.2997.6
Vehicle_45917.01003.0
Vehicle_55817.2997.6
Average58.417.1997.6
Table 3. Overview of AI Technologies, Key Barriers, and Enablers Across Sectors in Dubai’s Urban Logistics Ecosystem.
Table 3. Overview of AI Technologies, Key Barriers, and Enablers Across Sectors in Dubai’s Urban Logistics Ecosystem.
SectorOrganizationAI Technology UsedTechnical Specification (Algorithms/Architectures)Key BarriersKey EnablersComparative Performance Notes
Logistics and Fleet OperatorsAramexDynamic SchedulingReinforcement Learning (Q-learning), Evolutionary AlgorithmsIntegration ComplexityPublic–Private PartnershipsRL improved fuel efficiency by 14% over rule-based scheduling
DHLIoT SensorsRandom Forest, SVM for anomaly detectionSkill GapsPublic–Private PartnershipsEarly anomaly detection improved fleet uptime by 6%
Careem LogisticsDynamic SchedulingReinforcement Learning (Q-learning)Integration ComplexityGovernment SupportDelivery time reduced by 13% vs. baseline
Smart City and Transport AuthoritiesSmart DubaiIoT SensorsRandom ForestData Privacy ConcernsPublic–Private PartnershipsEnabled predictive maintenance alerts with 5% energy savings
Dubai Future FoundationPredictive RoutingGradient-Boosted Decision Trees (GBDT)Skill GapsAI FundingAchieved 12% delivery time reduction
RTA DubaiDynamic SchedulingReinforcement Learning, GBDT for routingIntegration ComplexityDigital InfrastructureFuel efficiency gain of 15% vs. baseline
AI and Technology ProvidersDerqDynamic SchedulingEvolutionary AlgorithmsData Privacy ConcernsAI FundingEnergy usage reduced by 9%
IBM MENAAutonomous VehiclesDeep Neural Networks (YOLOv5, ResNet)Skill GapsPublic–Private PartnershipsIdling time reduced by 8%
Huawei UAEIoT SensorsRandom Forest, Gradient-Boosted TreesIntegration ComplexityGovernment SupportFleet fuel usage reduced by 7%
Energy and Sustainability ExpertsDEWAAutonomous VehiclesDeep Neural Networks (YOLOv5)Skill GapsAI FundingReduced depot congestion, saving 6% energy
Ministry of EnergyDynamic SchedulingReinforcement LearningSkill GapsAI FundingAverage delivery time reduced by 10%
Dubai Carbon CentreIoT SensorsRandom ForestData Privacy ConcernsDigital InfrastructureEnergy use reduced by 5% in pilot phase
Academic ExpertsZayed UniversityIoT SensorsRandom ForestHigh CostsGovernment SupportLimited deployment but achieved 4% energy savings
University of DubaiPredictive RoutingCNN for traffic image analysis, GBDTData Privacy ConcernsAI FundingDelivery times reduced by 14%
UAEUPredictive RoutingGBDT, CNNHigh CostsPublic–Private PartnershipsReduced CO2 emissions by 11%
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Mohsen, B.M.; Mohsen, M. AI-Driven Energy Optimization in Urban Logistics: Implications for Smart SCM in Dubai. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188301

AMA Style

Mohsen BM, Mohsen M. AI-Driven Energy Optimization in Urban Logistics: Implications for Smart SCM in Dubai. Sustainability. 2025; 17(18):8301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188301

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mohsen, Baha M., and Mohamad Mohsen. 2025. "AI-Driven Energy Optimization in Urban Logistics: Implications for Smart SCM in Dubai" Sustainability 17, no. 18: 8301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188301

APA Style

Mohsen, B. M., & Mohsen, M. (2025). AI-Driven Energy Optimization in Urban Logistics: Implications for Smart SCM in Dubai. Sustainability, 17(18), 8301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17188301

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop