Next Article in Journal
CAD Assistant for Evaluating the Economic and Ecological Sustainability of Products
Previous Article in Journal
CFD-Based Evaluation of Waste Heat Recovery and Pressure Drop in Rotary Sinter Coolers Under Varying Bed Properties and Inlet Conditions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: El Chami et al. A Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Benefits of Applying the Circular Economy Model to the Fertiliser Sector. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15468

1
TIMAC AGRO Italia S.p.A., S.P.13, Località Ca’ Nova, 26010 Ripalta Arpina, Italy
2
Department of Civil, Chemical and Environmental Engineering (DICCA), University of Genoa, Via Montallegro 1, 16145 Genoa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(17), 8067; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178067
Submission received: 30 July 2025 / Accepted: 14 August 2025 / Published: 8 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Agriculture)
In the research of El Chami et al. (2023) [1], the original Table 9 in Section 3 should be replaced with the updated Table 9.
In the original paper in Table 9, the results of the LCIA are divided by impact categories and by formulation; the error is in the third impact category, EP. The current unit is k g   S O 2 e q :
Table 9. The results of the LCIA are divided by impact categories and by formulation.
Table 9. The results of the LCIA are divided by impact categories and by formulation.
ProductImpact Category
GWPAPEPETLand UseWSRU
kg CO2eqkg SO2eqkg SO2eqCTUePtm3 eqMJ
TIMATECHOld formulation1816.2612.121.7568,915.256196.771052.2847,162.50
New formulation1649.2811.521.6968,287.476073.04883.0645,662.88
EUROCODOld formulation2107.9910.392.9366,528.083086.22326.4530,341.27
New formulation2001.4210.742.7770,965.223741.31361.9433,859.51
PRIMEOld formulation1922.7118.182.1179,286.0410,887.72654.2676,184.50
New formulation1783.6217.971.9987,871.9411,115.99678.8577,172.94
MAGNIFIQUEOld formulation1871.5211.062.4056,230.344481.99355.2237,976.37
New formulation1789.1110.712.3360,701.464379.02364.4536,961.32
The correct unit should be k g   P O 4 3 e q :
Table 9. The results of the LCIA are divided by impact categories and by formulation.
Table 9. The results of the LCIA are divided by impact categories and by formulation.
ProductImpact Category
GWPAPEPETLand UseWSRU
kg CO2eqkg SO2eq k g   P O 4 3 e q CTUePtm3 eqMJ
TIMATECHOld formulation1816.2612.121.7568,915.256196.771052.2847,162.50
New formulation1649.2811.521.6968,287.476073.04883.0645,662.88
EUROCODOld formulation2107.9910.392.9366,528.083086.22326.4530,341.27
New formulation2001.4210.742.7770,965.223741.31361.9433,859.51
PRIMEOld formulation1922.7118.182.1179,286.0410,887.72654.2676,184.50
New formulation1783.6217.971.9987,871.9411,115.99678.8577,172.94
MAGNIFIQUEOld formulation1871.5211.062.4056,230.344481.99355.2237,976.37
New formulation1789.1110.712.3360,701.464379.02364.4536,961.32
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. El Chami, D.; Santagata, R.; Moretti, S.; Moreschi, L.; Del Borghi, A.; Gallo, M. A Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Benefits of Applying the Circular Economy Model to the Fertiliser Sector. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

El Chami, D.; Santagata, R.; Moretti, S.; Moreschi, L.; Del Borghi, A.; Gallo, M. Correction: El Chami et al. A Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Benefits of Applying the Circular Economy Model to the Fertiliser Sector. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15468. Sustainability 2025, 17, 8067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178067

AMA Style

El Chami D, Santagata R, Moretti S, Moreschi L, Del Borghi A, Gallo M. Correction: El Chami et al. A Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Benefits of Applying the Circular Economy Model to the Fertiliser Sector. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15468. Sustainability. 2025; 17(17):8067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178067

Chicago/Turabian Style

El Chami, Daniel, Raffaella Santagata, Stefania Moretti, Luca Moreschi, Adriana Del Borghi, and Michela Gallo. 2025. "Correction: El Chami et al. A Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Benefits of Applying the Circular Economy Model to the Fertiliser Sector. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15468" Sustainability 17, no. 17: 8067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178067

APA Style

El Chami, D., Santagata, R., Moretti, S., Moreschi, L., Del Borghi, A., & Gallo, M. (2025). Correction: El Chami et al. A Life Cycle Assessment to Evaluate the Environmental Benefits of Applying the Circular Economy Model to the Fertiliser Sector. Sustainability 2023, 15, 15468. Sustainability, 17(17), 8067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17178067

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop