Next Article in Journal
Enhanced xPatch for Short-Term Photovoltaic Power Forecasting: Supporting Sustainable and Resilient Energy Systems
Previous Article in Journal
When Confidence Backfires: The Impact of Managerial Overconfidence on Environmental Information Disclosure
Previous Article in Special Issue
From Local Actions to Global Impact: Overcoming Hurdles and Showcasing Sustainability Achievements in the Implementation of SDG12
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Unlocking the Commercialization of SAF Through Integration of Industry 4.0: A Technological Perspective

1
Management Department, Seidman College of Business, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401, USA
2
Barney School of Business, University of Hartford, West Hartford, CT 06117, USA
3
Department of Transportation and Supply Chain Management, College of Business, North Dakota State University, Fargo, ND 58108, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(16), 7325; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167325
Submission received: 8 July 2025 / Revised: 8 August 2025 / Accepted: 11 August 2025 / Published: 13 August 2025

Abstract

Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) has demonstrated significant potential to reduce carbon emissions in the aviation industry. Multiple national and international initiatives have been launched to accelerate SAF adoption, yet large-scale commercialization continues to face technological, operational, and regulatory barriers. Industry 4.0 provides a suite of advanced technologies that can address these challenges and improve SAF operations across the supply chain. This study conducts an integrative literature review to identify and synthesize research on the application of Industry 4.0 technologies in the production and distribution of SAF. The findings highlight that technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, digital twins, and 3D printing can enhance feedstock logistics, optimize conversion pathways, improve certification and compliance processes, and strengthen overall supply chain transparency and resilience. By mapping these applications to the six key workstreams of the SAF Grand Challenge, this study presents a practical framework linking technological innovation to both strategic and operational aspects of SAF commercialization. Integrating Industry 4.0 solutions into SAF production and supply chains contributes to reducing life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, strengthens low-carbon energy systems, and supports the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 13 (SDG 13). The findings from this research offer practical guidance to policymakers, industry practitioners, investors, and technology developers seeking to accelerate the global shift toward carbon neutrality in aviation.

1. Introduction

As global aviation continues to expand, so does its environmental footprint, particularly concerning greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Aviation currently accounts for 2–3% of global carbon dioxide emissions. Without targeted interventions, this share is expected to grow significantly over the coming decades due to increased air travel demand [1,2,3]. Figure 1 shows the carbon dioxide emissions generated by the aviation sector, considering different scenarios such as not doing anything regarding improving the aviation sector to reduce its emissions and making improvements in areas such as aircraft technology, operations, and SAF [4].
Sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), derived from renewable biomass, waste materials, or synthetic processes, has emerged as a promising solution to substantially reduce aviation-related carbon emissions [2]. SAF can reduce life cycle GHG emissions by 50–90% compared to conventional fossil-based jet fuels [5]. Promoting SAF production aligns with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) framework, which is designed to address interconnected global challenges arising from issues such as inequality, poverty, climate change, and environmental degradation [6].
Specifically, there are 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 1—No Poverty; SDG 2—Zero Hunger; SDG 3—Good Health and Well-Being; SDG 4—Quality Education; SDG 5—Gender Equality; SDG 6—Clean Water and Sanitation; SDG 7—Affordable and Clean Energy; SDG 8—Decent Work and Economic Growth; SDG 9—Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure; SDG 10—Reduced Inequalities; SDG 11—Sustainable Cities and Communities; SDG 12—Responsible Consumption and Production; SDG 13—Climate Action; SDG 14—Life Below Water; SDG 15—Life on Land; SDG 16—Peace, Justice, and Strong Institutions; SDG 17—Partnerships for the Goals. To date, these 17 goals have been supported by 169 targets, 4063 events, 1364 publications, and 8521 actions [7].
The SDG frameworks are of great significance as they offer a practical framework for aligning governments, policymakers, businesses, society, and individuals toward common objectives. Numerous scholars have examined the SDGs from various perspectives to highlight their importance [8,9]. Notably, SDG 13 emphasizes the importance of undertaking measures to combat climate change and mitigate its subsequent impacts [10]. According to Church and White [11], climate change refers to alterations in weather patterns and extreme weather phenomena, such as heatwaves and floods. It also involves the rise in the Earth’s temperature, changes in rainfall, and an increase in sea level.
Among the most impactful developments of SDGs is the growing interest in digital technologies, especially in the Industry 4.0 context [12]. Industry 4.0 is characterized by its integration of modern technologies. These include artificial intelligence (AI), Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, digital twins, big data analytics, cloud computing, augmented reality (AR), virtual reality (VR), and robotics [13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Figure 2, under Section 2.2, distinguishes five principal Industry 4.0 technologies along with their main subcomponents. Disruptive technologies such as blockchain, AI, big data analytics, and Internet of Things (IoT) have enhanced operational efficiency through stronger connectivity and scalable solutions across sectors. These technologies appear promising when applied to supply chain integration and SAF production. They have significant potential in commercializing SAF production, expediting development, improving fuel quality, simplifying certification procedures, and improving infrastructure compatibility [20].
There is a large body of literature that has demonstrated the transformative role of Industry 4.0 technologies in achieving SDGs. For instance, based on a review of 473 articles, Hariyani et al. [21] illustrated how AI, cloud computing, and remote sensing could be used to achieve SDG 13 through automation and predictive analysis. Similarly, Varriale et al. [22] conducted a systematic literature review of 578 SDG-related literature. Their study identified 11 digital technologies that are applied in 17 industries to accomplish all 17 SDGs. Their results highlighted AI as a powerful tool in addressing SDG 13.
Moreover, Raman et al. [23] discussed how digital twins, AR, and VR are revolutionizing energy systems. Based on a review study of 508 publications, their paper proved that smart grids and AI-driven models are effective in attaining SDG 13. Magazzino and Zakaria [24] demonstrated how artificial neural networks (ANNs), which is a key technique in AI, could capture complex, non-linear interactions among sustainable indicators, resulting in significantly enhancing the success in reaching SDG 13.
Researchers have also shown significant interest in examining SDG 13 in developing and emerging economies. As one of the most prominent emerging economies, China is confronting serious climate challenges. Leveraging on a fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP), Solangi and Magazzino [25] conducted a comprehensive analysis of financial risk, social benefits, and economic viability of its SDG 13 initiatives. Kartal et al. [26] showcased how energy and environmental policies could help five leading emerging economies to achieve their SDG 13. Based on data spanning from 2000 to 2020, their research disclosed diverse outcomes across the countries. For instance, in Brazil, gross domestic product (GDP) and foreign direct investment (FDI) increased the ecological footprint, indicating a negative impact on the environment, whereas renewable energy use (REU) reduced the footprint, supporting environmental sustainability.
GHG emissions associated with the combustion of fossil-based fuels are believed to be the major factor contributing to climate change, and renewable energies have been introduced as green alternatives to combat the issue [27]. Recognizing SAF as a practical solution to reduce emissions in the industry, several countries have established roadmaps to reach specific SAF production levels and significantly lower the carbon emissions generated by the sector. A list of SAF roadmaps can be found in Table 1. In the United States, in alignment with international climate commitments to reduce GHG emissions in the aviation sector, a roadmap named the SAF Grand Challenge was proposed to promote SAF production [28].
Sustainable transitions, particularly in challenging sectors like aviation, require a pragmatic sustainability approach that goes beyond ambitious goals and idealistic frameworks [35]. According to D’Adamo et al. [35], a pragmatic sustainability approach can balance environmental, economic, and social goals through realistic and actionable strategies, rather than relying on abstract ideals or ideological approaches. Despite its recognized benefits, the widespread adoption of SAF faces several barriers. These include high production costs, stringent quality requirements, feedstock availability and sustainability, complex regulatory certification processes, challenges in distributing and integrating SAF into existing aviation infrastructures, lack of policy support, incentives, and mandates, and lack of awareness of the role of SAF as a sustainable fuel [36,37,38,39]. These barriers can be overcome through innovative approaches, such as adopting Industry 4.0 technologies to play a transformative role [14]. Decarbonizing aviation can be accelerated by incremental improvements and feasible innovation pathways, rather than pursuing perfection. Industry 4.0 technologies offer practical and scalable tools to address major barriers to commercializing SAF and achieve a pragmatic, sustainable progress within the aviation industry.
This research offers a unique contribution to the existing literature on SAF production and commercialization. It presents the first exploratory analysis of how Industry 4.0 technologies are integrated and applied within SAF roadmaps, specifically focusing on the SAF Grand Challenge in the United States. Prior studies have examined technological innovations associated with Industry 4.0 and their general applicability in renewable energy supply chains. However, no study targeted the role of innovations and the potential contributions of integrating Industry 4.0 technologies to advance SAF commercialization. This research addresses knowledge gaps by evaluating and providing resources related to current practices and potential technological applications, specifically assessing how Industry 4.0 technologies could simplify the SAF commercialization pathway, expedite regulatory approvals, enhance fuel quality, and improve overall SAF operations and supply chains. Particularly, it provides resources discussing the application of Industry 4.0 technologies in the context of SAF production, supply chain, or policy, particularly those addressing challenges related to the SAF Grand Challenge workstreams and their corresponding action areas. The goal of this study is to answer the research question: From a technological perspective, how could the technological components of Industry 4.0 help accelerate SAF production? Through detailed case analyses and synthesis of existing literature on SAF production and Industry 4.0 technologies, this study offers managerial implications on the practical integration of the technologies into SAF production systems. This work, therefore, provides valuable insights not only for academics seeking to advance understanding of potential opportunities for achieving sustainable SAF production, but also for the stakeholders and policymakers aiming to accelerate SAF adoption to achieve emissions reduction targets in the aviation industry.
The remainder of the paper is structured as follows: Section 2 expands on information regarding the technological aspects of Industry 4.0 and elaborates further on the SAF Grand Challenge. Section 3 discusses the research methodology. Section 4 discusses the workstream intersections between Industry 4.0 technologies and the SAF Grand Challenge. In conclusion, Section 5 provides a summary of the findings and outlines a perspective for future studies.

2. Background

This section provides an overview of the two key concepts explored in this research: the SAF Grand Challenge and Industry 4.0, along with their associated technologies.

2.1. Sustainable Aviation Roadmaps

Achieving deep decarbonization in the aviation sector is a central challenge in the global effort to mitigate climate change. The United Nations SDGs, particularly SDG 13 (Climate Action), emphasize the need for accelerating transitions toward low-carbon energy systems, including those used in hard-to-abate sectors such as aviation [40]. Given the industry’s dependence on highly energy-dense liquid fuels, SAF has emerged as a promising alternative capable of reducing life cycle GHG emissions by up to 80% compared to conventional jet fuels [41].
Over the past two decades, several global and national efforts have been launched to promote SAF development through policy incentives, R&D funding, certification frameworks, and private–public collaborations. Several landmark regional and global initiatives have been instrumental in laying the foundation for the worldwide development and adoption of SAF. The efforts were initiated with the ASTM D7566 Certification in 2009, which approved blending SAF with conventional jet fuel. The ASTM Certification provided the initial commercial pathway for the use of SAF consistent with existing aircraft and airport infrastructure [42,43]. In 2013, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) rolled out the Alternative Fuels Roadmap to provide guidance to member states on sustainable fuels, while also compiling global SAF progress metrics. The establishment of this roadmap laid the groundwork for subsequent regulations and contributed to the ICAO Expo’s development of the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA) in October 2016. As a key part of CORSIA, when an airline surpasses its 2020 CO2 emissions threshold, it must offset those emissions [44,45]. One of the most significant regional initiatives, launched by the European Union (EU) in 2020, is the ReFuelEU Aviation Initiative [46]. ReFuelEU Aviation sets binding SAF targets for airlines in the EU. This involves blending SAF, starting at a minimum of 2% by 2025 and increasing to 70% by 2050.
Additionally, multiple countries have considered whether to develop their own SAF roadmap with a focus on increasing SAF capacity and the building of SAF supply chains and supporting sustainable feedstocks, SAF production, and SAF blending at airports. A summary of the initiatives by countries is presented in Table 1. It is worth noting that several other countries not included in the table, such as France, the United Kingdom, Finland, Norway, and Sweden, have established ambitious objectives for producing SAF; However, they have yet to publicly disclose a comprehensive roadmap outlining their plans and expectations, encompassing not only mandates and GHG reductions expected, but also all relevant aspects of SAF production.
Building upon these global and national initiatives, the United States has emerged as a key player in advancing SAF through the launch of the SAF Grand Challenge. While many countries have outlined general goals or introduced mandates related to SAF production and use, the U.S. roadmap distinguishes itself through its depth, interagency coordination, and actionable framework. The SAF Grand Challenge offers a clear pathway for specific actions across the supply chain. It sets ambitious production targets and aims to spur collaboration and innovation at every step in the effort to derive SAF solutions. The following takes a deeper look at this initiative, its structure, and its relevance as a benchmark model for other national efforts aiming to scale SAF production and decarbonize aviation.
The SAF Grand Challenge is an effort that integrates resources from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Department of Transportation (DOT), and the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) alongside the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) with the aim of accelerating SAF production and utilization [28]. The U.S. Biden administration designed this initiative to enhance the use of SAF towards decarbonizing the U.S. aviation industry. The SAF Grand Challenge sought to achieve an annual production of 3 billion gallons by 2030 and 35 billion gallons by 2050 [28]. This goal envisions achieving a complete substitution for conventional jet fuel utilized within domestic aviation. The move would reduce GHG emissions by at least 50% over their life cycle.
This initiative builds on the fact that aviation is one of the most challenging sectors to decarbonize because of its reliance on high-density liquid fuels [47,48]. SAF offers a feasible option for emission reduction in the near and intermediate terms. SAF can be produced from renewable or waste-derived streams and is fully compatible with existing aircraft and infrastructure. However, production at these levels necessitates multiple and coordinated changes in policies, investments, and collaboration along the entire supply chain. These changes will range from feedstock cultivation and fuel production to logistics, certification, and consumption.
To achieve the strategic objective, the SAF Grand Challenge Roadmap lays out six key action areas: (1) feedstock innovation, (2) conversion technology innovation, (3) building supply chains, (4) policy and valuation analysis, (5) enabling end use, and (6) communicating progress and building support. Each area includes specific workstreams designed to tackle multifaceted technical, economic, environmental, and institutional issues. For instance, feedstock innovation relates to increasing the recovery of sustainable biomass and waste resources. Workstreams under conversion technology seek to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of viable jet fuel production. The roadmap also emphasizes the need to develop comprehensive and regionally optimized supply chains capable of large-scale operations in production and distribution.
While the roadmap is more of a policy and coordination-oriented plan, it implicitly suggests that innovation and technical progress must be at the center of fulfilling each of these goals. Workstreams include developing environmental models, optimizing resource flows, fuel quality analysis, and infrastructure capacity expansion. The roadmap emphasizes that the objectives will not be achieved without long-term coordination and collaboration across government agencies, industry partners, academics, and the community. This collaboration is meant to provide consistent cross-sector action that is reactive and proactive. The rationale is to incorporate the best available data, information, knowledge, and intelligence into the various processes and operations embedded in SAF supply chains. The roadmap also highlights the need for adaptive implementation through ongoing learning, system-level assessment, and feedback loops. In this way, the capability and willingness to implement new approaches, tools, and innovations in relation to feedstock management, fuel qualification, and supply chain modeling will reflect the need to continually develop competitive capabilities. As a result, although the roadmap focuses on policy and coordination, its structure leaves space for advanced and innovative approaches and technologies to shape and assist the broader decarbonization goal in aviation.

2.2. Industry 4.0

Industry 4.0 represents the Fourth Industrial Revolution. A group of German scientists introduced the concept around 2011 to describe emerging technological trends in manufacturing. It focuses on the integration of automation, the management of big data through cloud computing, high-capacity data exchanges that enable connectivity across manufacturing processes, and the capability to convert digital instructions into physical outputs [49]. A key feature of Industry 4.0 is the decentralization of decision-making, allowing cyber-physical systems to operate independently [50]. Many disruptive technologies have been suggested under Industry 4.0. However, scholars have yet to reach an agreement, due to different perspectives across research domains [16].
This paper builds on the paradigms introduced by Weyer et al. [51] and insights from Choi et al.’s [52]. Figure 2 maps a broad set of technologies and applications associated with Industry 4.0, including blockchains, AI, IoT, 3D printing, and digital twins. Then, the following sections further explore the specific technologies that fall within each of these broader categories.

2.2.1. Blockchains

Blockchains are decentralized ledgers secured through cryptography. They can process and verify transactional data within a distributed database system [53]. According to Pattison [54], the core feature of a blockchain is decentralization, which eliminates the need for a central authority and prevents any single entity from controlling the information. A blockchain operates on a peer-to-peer (P2P) network, requiring all relevant parties to agree on the validity of transactions [55]. This system is often governed by smart contracts, which are digital protocols containing predefined terms that are stored directly on the blockchain. These smart contracts enable the synchronized and immutable storage of information, providing a high level of security and traceability throughout the information flow [56]. Table 2 summarizes the key technology components in a blockchain and their applications in supply chain management.

2.2.2. AI

AI is currently driving significant transformation in Industry 4.0 by enabling innovative and intelligent production, operational, and management systems [80]. Major companies, such as Amazon, Walmart, and Best Buy, have already extensively integrated AI into their supply chains. The most widely adopted disruptive technologies within the field of AI include machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), computer vision, robotic process automation, and generative AI [81]. Table 3 summarizes the key technologies in AI and their applications in supply chain management.

2.2.3. Internet of Things (IoT)

According to Hassini [118], IoT refers to a network of physical devices characterized by the following key features: (1) They are digitally integrated within the supply chain network; (2) this connectivity enables data storage, sharing, and analysis; (3) it supports both intra- and inter-organizational processes; and (4) it enhances coordination in supply chain planning, control, and management. IoT plays a foundational role in the context of Industry 4.0, serving as a critical enabler of the Fourth Industrial Revolution [119,120]. An IoT network in supply chain management typically includes the four essential layers summarized in Table 4 [121,122].

2.2.4. 3D Printing

3D printing, also called additive manufacturing, enables the creation of complex physical objects from digital 3D models by using a variety of materials such as plastics, metals, ceramics, and even biomaterials [141,142]. It has brought unprecedented levels of innovation to manufacturing as it allows diverse material inputs to support individualized design [142,143]. Table 5 summarizes its key features and applications in supply chain management.

2.2.5. Simulations (Digital Twins/AR/VR)

A digital twin is a real-time virtual model of a physical object or system that is created using sensor data gathered from the real world [155]. Teams can visualize, analyze, and learn more about the behavior and performance of the physical counterpart throughout its life cycle with this data-driven model [156]. The ability to deliver continuous and real-time data is the most crucial advantage of a digital twin. It enables organizations to monitor system performance, anticipate potential issues, and make more informed, data-driven decisions [157]. Digital twins can also provide simulations of how products, processes, and systems could react under varying situations [158,159].
Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) are immersive technologies that enhance physical–digital integration in supply chains by providing real-time, spatially contextualized information [160]. AR overlays digital content onto physical environments through smart glasses or mobile devices, while VR creates fully immersive simulations of supply chain environments, enabling users to interact with complex systems virtually [160]. These technologies are increasingly applied to support end-to-end supply chain functions, including logistics optimization, warehouse management, training and workforce development, infrastructure design, and collaborative decision-making. Table 6 summarizes key features and applications of digital twins, AR, and VR in supply chain management.

3. Research Methods

The integrative literature review approach has been adopted as the primary research methodology [171]. An integrative review is particularly suitable for emerging topics that have not yet been extensively conceptualized, allowing researchers to synthesize insights from multiple disciplinary perspectives to generate initial conceptualizations and theoretical frameworks [172]. This approach offers an ideal methodological foundation for this study because the nexus between Industry 4.0 and SAF production is an emerging and multidisciplinary field.
The authors of this research chose the integrative literature review method because it is flexible and can produce new theoretical insights and practical frameworks instead of just summarizing the body of existing literature. A more focused but creative analysis is made possible by the method’s emphasis on synthesizing and critically evaluating literature that particularly supports the study objectives, as opposed to a systematic review’s pursuit of thorough coverage of all pertinent literature [173]. The current study investigates the applicability of Industry 4.0 technologies in SAF production systems, which are both emerging research domains.
An integrative literature review requires researchers to demonstrate excellent conceptual thinking [174], transparency, and skillful techniques to critically review a large body of literature. This method of literature review aims to collect, examine, and synthesize the current literature on a research topic to facilitate new perspectives or framework emergence, while generating new knowledge [173].
This study conducted an integrative literature review because it can successfully capture literature from multiple domains through holistic conceptualization and synthesis [175]. This integrative review uses the framework from Whittemore and Knafl [171] for data collection, analysis, and synthesis. This integrative methodology synthesizes existing literature from diverse but related fields, such as renewable energy, aviation fuel policy, and advanced digital technologies, to strengthen the framework provided by the SAF Grand Challenge for technological advancements. Each step of the literature search utilized the following databases and related search tools: EBSCOhost, Emerald, Wiley, Taylor and Francis, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Web of Science. The Google search engine produced additional literature from white papers, industry reports, news articles, company websites, and brochures. These data sources are well recognized as a reliable foundation for academic research [176]. This paper only includes English language publications from 2011 to the present, as Industry 4.0 was invented in 2011. There are three significant steps in this process.
Step 1: Identify disruptive technologies in Industry 4.0. To begin this integrative review, we searched literature review articles with a high impact factor or citation (as shown in Google Scholar) from reputable journals using the following keywords: “Industry 4.0” and “literature review”; “Industry 4.0” and “review studies.”
Given the wide range of terminology being used in Industry 4.0, the selection process is not restricted to these keywords. Instead, we examined the titles, abstracts, and keywords of all full papers, or the full paper itself as needed. In addition, a supplementary backward snowballing exercise was conducted, where citations from key studies identified in the first stage were reviewed.
This thorough procedure aims to capture as many representative literature review articles as possible. After careful examination, we identified n = 11 literature review articles, and they serve as a foundation for this review. They cover a wide range of relevant work related to the topic and discuss how Industry 4.0 reflects from different perspectives. In the end, this review effectively identified five broad sets of disruptive technologies associated with Industry 4.0 from a supply chain perspective, as shown in Figure 1. These include blockchain, AI, IoT, 3D printing, and digital twins.
Step 2: Identify specific disruptive technologies in supply chains and their applications. Each broad disruptive technology in Figure 1 also includes specific technologies underlying it. Our goal is to provide an in-depth review of applications of these technologies in supply chains. To explore the technologies within each broader category, we used the following keywords:
  • Keywords referring to blockchain: “Distributed Ledger technology (DLT)”, “Smart contract”, “Tokenization”.
  • Keywords referring to AI: “machine learning (ML)”, “natural language processing (NLP)”, “computer vision”, “robotic process automation (RPA)”, and “generative AI (GAI)”.
  • Other keywords: “Internet of Things (IoT)”, “cloud computing”, “edge computing”, “3D printing”, “additive manufacturing,” “simulations”, “Digital Twins (DT)”, “AR/VR”.
n = 121 articles were selected and provided a summary about the applications and functions of each technology in supply chains. For data analysis, we have utilized tables to list the key technologies, their definitions, features, and representative supply chain applications, as shown in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6. The goal is to enhance the understanding of Industry 4.0 and its representative disruptive technologies, and to provide insights about their applications in supply chains.
Step 3: explore how disruptive technologies could be used to address the SAF Grand Challenge. There are six workstreams under the SAF Grand Challenge: “Feedstock Innovation”, “Conversion Technology”, “Building Supply Chains”, “Policy and Valuation”, “Enabling End Use”, and “Communicating Progress”. There are also key action areas under each work stream. For instance, the key action areas under each workstream include:
  • Feedstock innovation: Resource market and availability analysis; increase sustainable lipid supply; boost biomass production and waste collection; improve feedstock supply logistics; improve feedstock handling reliability; enhance sustainability of biomass supply.
  • Conversion technology: Decarbonize and scale fermentation-based fuels; enhance ASTM pathways; develop bio-intermediates; reduce risk and scale up; develop innovative pathways.
  • Building supply chains: Establish regional coalitions; model SAF supply chains; demonstrate regional supply chains; develop production infrastructure.
  • Policy and valuation: Improve environmental data and models; techno-economic feasibility analysis; contribute to SAF policy development.
  • Enabling end use: Support evaluation and testing; adopt high-percentage SAF blends; explore synthetic jet fuels; adapt infrastructure.
  • Communicating progress: Engage stakeholders; assess benefits and influence; track SAF Grand Challenge; share positive impacts.
A Boolean search was conducted using the following keywords: “Industry 4.0 in SAF” or “Industry 4.0 in biofuels” or “Industry 4.0 in renewable fuels” to identify publications related to at least one key action area under the SAF Grand Challenge workstreams about disruptive technologies in Industry 4.0. In total, there are n = 177 representative publications included.
The literature was analyzed and synthesized through qualitative content analysis to highlight how those disruptive technologies could be used to address the key action areas in the SAF Grand Challenge.
Content analysis systematically analyzes the meaning of both qualitative and quantitative data [177]. A successful content analysis is both rigorous and flexible [178]. It is rigorous because it follows an iterative process to reduce large volumes of information to extract key insights from each publication. It is flexible because it allows a combination of concept-driven and data-driven methodologies in coding the information [179]. In our study, we organized a large volume of information into themes and sub-themes that form the structure of this paper. The themes are the following: feedstock innovation, conversion technology, building supply chains, policy and valuation, enabling end use, communicating progress, and the sub-themes are the key action areas under each workstream.
A summary of the steps and criteria for implementing this approach as a framework is outlined in Table 7. The summary of the results after implementing the framework can also be found in Table 8, in Section 3.

4. Discussion and Implications

This section examines the potential contributions of various technological dimensions of Industry 4.0 toward achieving the SAF Grand Challenge objective, specifically focusing on the commercialization of SAF. Each aspect of Industry 4.0 technologies is analyzed individually to identify its intersections and applications within the respective work streams and action areas outlined in section two, pertaining to the SAF Grand Challenge. Table 8 outlines a summary of the results from implementing the framework. In addition to the workstreams, the table presents the key action areas within each workstream. The third column lists the specific Industry 4.0 technologies associated with each key action area, along with our observations on their applications, presented in the last column. The following subsections will then provide a more detailed discussion of each of these connections, explaining how the enabling technologies can facilitate and/or advance the implementation of each workstream.

4.1. Feedstock Innovation

It is crucial to establish sustainable feedstock supply chains to scale SAF production while minimizing costs, environmental impacts, and disruption risks [180]. Feedstock availability, efficiency, and sustainability can be enhanced by leveraging Industry 4.0 technologies such as analytic support from AI, real-time monitoring through IoT devices, transparency using blockchain technology, and efficiency of logistics leveraging automation [181]. These technologies play a critical role in addressing each key action area under the feedstock innovation workstream, ensuring a resilient and scalable SAF supply chain.

4.1.1. Recourse Market and Availability Analysis

SAF supply chains present unique challenges in securing adequate, sustainable feedstocks and dealing with complex markets [28]. Emerging digital technologies, from big data analytics and AI to blockchain and cloud platforms, are being deployed to process and optimize feedstock availability, traceability, and market selection. For resource market analysis, big data analytics and AI-driven modeling tools can improve forecasting of feedstock supply and demand trends under varying SAF production scenarios [182,183,184]. C. Wu et al. [185] presents an ML framework that enables rapid estimation of fuel cost across randomized input scenarios for SAF production. Using this model, one can evaluate how variations in feedstock cost, supply volume, or technology performance impact SAF prices. As a producer of SAF, LanzaJet integrates AI and data analytics to refine its feedstock and production strategies [186]. The application of ML to datasets of agricultural yields and available waste enables the company to pinpoint optimal feedstock sources and enhance its conversion processes. Such a proactive approach furthers innovative SAF, enhances new plant site selection, alters fuel compositions, and improves overall profitability.
Blockchain-enabled market databases can provide transparent tracking of commodity and non-commodity feedstock sources, ensuring secure and verifiable data for stakeholders [187,188]. The Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials (RSB), in collaboration with Bioledger (Version 1.5, Bioledger Ltd., London, UK), piloted a project that involved creating a blockchain database to track the life cycle of used cooking oil (UCO) as a feedstock for biodiesel [189]. By 2020, in cooperation with industry partners, the system had claimed to track around 1.93 million liters of UCO along with proof of UCO’s verifiable origin, secure digital records, and claims of simplified auditing.
Leveraging cloud computing, AI-powered cloud platforms can integrate real-time market data and conduct analyses, allowing policymakers and industry leaders to anticipate shortages, optimize pricing, and manage resource allocation [190,191]. With feedstock markets proving volatile, SAF and low-carbon fuel companies are increasingly turning to cloud AI solutions to streamline operations. Biofuel refinery Imubit, for instance, uses an AI optimization system [192]. Its cloud-based platform identifies plant-level process data, market data like feedstock prices, demand in specific geographies, and competitive position. The company automatically adjusts the production parameters for ongoing optimal profitability. Their platform features real-time dashboards that enable operators to monitor key performance indicators (KPIs) and conduct scenario analysis.

4.1.2. Increase Sustainable Lipid Supply

According to the near-term plans specified in the SAF Grand Challenge, policy support and investment are essential to facilitate the production and utilization of expanded lipid-based feedstocks [28]. AI is transforming precision agriculture, which means utilizing more technology and innovative practices to improve agricultural productivity [193]. AI provides guidance by using analyzed geospatial data to supply real-time information about soil moisture, weather, and crop water requirements. Farmers can then manage their resources responsibly, optimizing agricultural production potential with less environmental footprint [194]. Similarly, there are blockchain tracking systems that provide transparency in waste lipid collection and processing, as well as to ensure sustainability of used cooking oils (UCOs), industrial byproducts, and other waste lipids [195]. A pilot study report by the Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials (RSB) [196] showcased how numerous transparency and accountability challenges within the UCO market could be addressed or vastly improved using a blockchain ledger. Another study by Gong et al. [195] examined UCO recycling in the UK and described a South European pilot that integrated blockchain with IoT sensors. The blockchain–IoT system authenticated each collection and traced the oil’s life cycle. This curtailed fraudulent collections and tax evasion associated with black market oil trading. ML algorithms can analyze data from waste treatment plants using sources such as UCO, identifying new opportunities for lipid recovery and conversion into SAF [197].
Investments alongside policy support are required for the production and utilization of expanded lipid-based feedstocks as highlighted in the SAF Grand Challenge [28]. AI can transform precision farming, which is the application of farming practices that utilize advanced technologies, to increase agricultural productivity [193]. Resource allocation is made more effective with the abundant use of AI. An example is the analysis of geospatial data that can provide real-time information on the soil moisture content, weather conditions, and the amount of water crops require. This aids in optimal resource allocation while improving harvest yields and crop health, while reducing the ecological footprint [194]. The collection and processing of waste lipids such as UCO or industrial byproducts can be verified for their sustainability using blockchain tracking systems, therefore ensuring transparency for lipid waste collection and processing [195]. There are new opportunities for recovering lipids from waste treatment facilities, and converting them to SAF, that can be discovered through analyses of UCO employing ML algorithms [197].

4.1.3. Boost Biomass Production and Waste Collection

For improving biomass and waste collection processes, IoT sensors in waste management facilities collect monitored data from municipal solid waste (MSW), and agricultural and forestry residues. This ensures efficient collection and sorting [198,199]. AI-driven route optimization tools can improve waste-to-biofuel supply chain logistics, reducing transportation costs and emissions [200,201]. A comprehensive analysis by Fang et al. [202] found that AI optimization reduces waste transportation distances by 36.8%, resulting in a 13.3% reduction in costs, and almost 28% in time savings in collection operations. Also, autonomous waste-sorting robots (ZenRobotics Recycler, ZenRobotics Ltd., Helsinki, Finland) can classify and separate biodegradable and non-biodegradable materials, increasing the efficiency of recyclable waste [203,204]. Koskinopoulou et al. [203] developed a low-cost computer vision module based on deep learning for identifying and sorting items. Also, location allocation of the potential biomass feedstocks for SAF can clarify and accelerate the adoption process by farmers and investors, by providing them with accurate information about the feasibility and profitability of the feedstocks [205,206].

4.1.4. Improve Feedstock Supply Logistics

To optimize feedstock logistics, AI-driven logistics platforms can streamline feedstock transportation, storage, and preprocessing by analyzing real-time data on weather, road conditions, and refinery demand [207]. FuelCab India (FuelCab Technologies Pvt. Ltd., Gurugram, India) is an AI-based logistics platform specializing in biofuels [208]. It connects biorefineries with feedstock suppliers, including farmers and waste generators. They forecast feedstock availability, recommend optimal routes, and predict market demand. To reduce delays, FuelCab’s logistics engine uses real-time data together with predictive analytics [208].
IoT-enabled monitoring systems can track biomass storage conditions. This ensures that feedstock remains stable and usable throughout the supply chain [209,210]. By monitoring and controlling stored biomass in real time, researchers emphasize being able to maintain desired specifications of biomass, such as temperature and humidity, and ultimately improve the effectiveness of downstream conversion [209] as well as its resiliency to uncertainties [211]. Blockchain operationalized smart contracts improve operational efficiency through the automatic transaction between stakeholders in a biomass supply chain. Stakeholders include feedstock suppliers, transporters, and biorefineries [187,212]. According to Andiappan et al. [212], with blockchain technology integration, stakeholders connected within a biomass supply chain can control the quality of the biomass and ensure compliance with sustainability standards. Hence, they can select suppliers based on verified quality. Edge computing for biomass feedstock logistics supports low-latency, real-time decision-making through local computation on devices like harvesters and drones [213]. This reduces network data transmitted, simplifies bandwidth requirements, and enhances resilience and autonomy, especially in low-connectivity areas.

4.1.5. Improve Feedstock Handling System Reliability

Digital twins and AI-driven material behavior models can simulate solid feedstock characteristics to inform handling efficiency enhancement and reduce processing downtime [214,215]. In biomass supply chains, AI models and digital twins can simulate how heterogeneous feedstocks will behave under handling, for example, the way moisture content, particle size, or density would clog a conveyor or hopper [216]. The integration of real-time sensor data with advanced simulations enables digital twins to forecast issues (such as bridging in hoppers) and enable predictive maintenance, thus minimizing downtime [217]. Robotic automation in biomass preprocessing facilities can ensure uniform feedstock quality, thereby reducing inefficiencies in SAF conversion processes [181,218]. Edge computing solutions enable real-time analysis of feedstock composition. This allows processing facilities to dynamically adjust pretreatment methods for optimal fuel yield [219]. Within SAF supply chains, edge-computing gear continuously monitors feedstock characteristics and adjusts operations in real time. Hence, nothing goes to waste [219]. Preprocessing plants can now use line conveyors and grinders with a mix of NIR scanners (DA7250, Perten Instruments, Springfield, IL, USA), cameras, and moisture probes that read each batch while it moves. This allows the system to log moisture, ash, particle size, and other characteristics [220]. Rather than transferring that data to a cloud system, local units can run their own AI models (edge computing) and decide whether the material meets specifications [220].
Robotic preprocessing in biomass preprocessing facilities can ensure uniform feedstock quality. This reduces inefficiencies in SAF conversion procedures [181,218,220]. One example is smart sorting setups now used for city trash and farm waste [220]. Modern preparation lines utilize optical and chemical sensors guided by AI to recognize materials such as plastics, metals, and papers by matching their shape, color, and spectral fingerprint. Guided by those readings, robotic arms or pneumatic grabs can swiftly pull away the unwanted pieces, leaving a steadier, cleaner biomass stream for the next step.

4.1.6. Enhance Sustainability of Biomass and Waste Supply Systems

AI-powered life cycle assessments (LCAs) can evaluate the social and environmental impacts of biomass collection and conversion. These tools help ensure sustainable feedstock supply chains [59,221,222]. For instance, Ghoroghi et al. [223] showed that machine learning tools now help set up scenarios and streamline inventory records during an LCA. In a real-world test, G. Guo et al. [221] trained a gradient-boosting tree to forecast how much bio-oil a given feedstock would produce. The model then fed those predictions into a follow-up LCA. They found that every kilogram of bio-oil emitted 2.05 kg of CO-equivalent emissions.
Blockchain-enabled sustainability tracking verifies compliance with renewable energy policies and emission reduction targets. This ensures that feedstock sourcing remains ethical and environmentally responsible [224]. For example, Energy Web Foundation and Rocky Mountain Institute are developing a new blockchain registry called SAFc, tailored for the aviation industry [225]. Fuel producers will mint SAF digital certificates at production so that airlines and companies can claim them to track CO2 reduction [225]. Additionally, IoT-based environmental monitoring systems track carbon sequestration and land use impacts. This provides data-driven insights for sustainable feedstock cultivation [226,227]. As one illustration, Dryad Networks (Dryad Networks GmbH, Berlin, Germany) uses distributed sensors to measure variables like soil moisture, fuel moisture, and tree growth. Their roadmap explicitly includes dendrometer sensors to gauge carbon sequestration in individual trees [228].

4.2. Conversion Technology

Developing and deploying SAF conversion technologies requires improvements in process efficiency, scalability, and infrastructure compatibility. Industry 4.0 technologies such as AI-driven process optimization, automation, IoT-enabled monitoring, blockchain for regulatory compliance, and additive manufacturing for catalyst development can provide several benefits. They include streamlining fermentation efficiency, validating ASTM pathways, developing bio-intermediates, mitigating risks, and innovating processes [229]. These technologies can play a key role in accelerating SAF deployment by reducing costs, improving efficiency, and enhancing scalability.

4.2.1. Decarbonize, Diversify, and Scale the Current Fermentation-Based Fuel Industry

AI-powered process control and enzyme optimization driven by ML can reduce the carbon intensity of starch ethanol production while maximizing yield in the fermentation process [230,231,232]. Owusu and Marfo [233] showed that combining a neural network with an ant colony optimizer models both enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation stages at the same time. The system produced accurate forecasts of sugar and ethanol level reductions.
IoT-enabled bioreactors (BIOSTAT® B-DCU, Sartorius Stedim Biotech GmbH, Göttingen, Germany) monitor fermentation conditions in real time, adjusting temperature, pH, and nutrient supply dynamically to enhance microbial efficiency without requiring additional corn planting [234,235]. For example, Baicu et al. [236] presented an IoT bioreactor proof of concept with a microcontroller connected to digital temperature and turbidity sensors. This system preserved the optimal yeast culture conditions by transferring data to the cloud and utilizing a Peltier module for precise heating or cooling. Edge computing solutions let fermentation plants process data on site, which speeds up processes and lets them make decisions in real time [237]. Additionally, blockchain-based carbon tracking systems can help monitor and verify emission reductions in ethanol-to-SAF conversion, ensuring regulatory compliance [188]. Blockchain tracks every ethanol milestone (corn harvest, fermentation, alcohol-to-jet upgrade) to create a clear low-carbon auditable record. Research shows this ledger can improve feedstock traceability by about 30%, cutting the odds of double-counting or errors [238].

4.2.2. Enhance Production and Reduce Carbon Intensity of Existing ASTM-Approved Pathways

To advance ASTM-qualified pathways, digital twins and AI-driven process simulations can model SAF conversion under different process conditions. This helps optimize efficiency and reduce costs before full-scale deployment [239,240,241]. Within an EU project, ORLEN and Yokogawa collaboratively developed a virtual plant model for green-hydrogen-and-carbon-dioxide-based synthetic aviation fuel [242]. The digital twin will simulate process economics and emissions for various modes of operation to identify the most promising route for production. 3D printing and additive manufacturing enable rapid catalyst and reactor component prototyping. This improves the efficiency of hydro-processed ester and fatty acid (HEFA), Fischer–Tropsch (FT), and alcohol-to-jet (ATJ) pathways [198,243]. Compliance monitoring with blockchain technology streamlines the regulatory approvals process by ensuring the accuracy of fuel performance data documentation. This accelerates the commercialization of ASTM-qualified SAF [244]. In a shipping industry pilot, COSCO Shipping and the Global Sustainable Bioenergy Network used blockchain to issue verifiable green certificates tied to specific biofuel procurements [245]. Each Proof of Sustainability certificate was recorded on-chain, allowing auditors, customers, and regulators to track carbon intensity and sustainability from source to combustion. This approach simplifies auditing and provides transparent proof of compliance for ASTM-approved SAF and renewable fuels.

4.2.3. Develop Bio-Intermediates and Pathways Compatible with Existing Capital Assets

For developing bio-intermediates and compatible pathways, AI-driven predictive modeling can identify optimal bio-intermediate formulations that are compatible with existing refineries. This reduces the need for costly infrastructure overhauls [246,247]. Comesana et al. [248] noted that ML models can predict relevant biofuel production pathways and screen large libraries of candidate molecules (jet fuel precursors) by their boiling point, energy content, and other characteristics. This enables rapid down-selection of promising formulations. Cyber-physical systems and automated processing units dynamically adjust reaction conditions. This optimizes the conversion of biomass, industrial waste gases, and other alternative feedstocks into SAF-compatible intermediates [249]. For example, a project led by the IEA investigated the conversion of biomass into bio-oils using fast pyrolysis or liquefaction [250]. These intermediates are then co-processed in existing refinery units. This method uses current equipment, such as hydrocrackers or FCC units, to upgrade bio-crude on site. Doing so eliminates the need for new investments while producing low-carbon jet and diesel fuels. 3D-printed biocatalysts and enzyme reactors improve the efficiency of biochemical conversion processes. This ensures higher yields at lower costs [251]. For instance, Schmieg et al. [252] utilized 3D-printed hydrogel lattices to entrap enzymes for continuous conversion. They achieved stable reactor operation for 72 h with consistent product formation.

4.2.4. Reduce Risk During Operations and Scale-Up

To mitigate scale-up and operational risks, AI-driven predictive maintenance reduces equipment failures by analyzing sensor data from reactors, distillation units, and processing plants to anticipate potential disruptions [13,253]. Shell used ML to monitor sensor signals, detecting deviations in temperatures and valve positions [254]. In 2020, the AI system identified 65 control valves needing repair, which traditional inspections had missed. Digital twins can simulate SAF production scenarios. This helps identify bottlenecks and optimize process design before large-scale implementation [240,255]. For example, Sierla et al. [256] outlined a semi-automated workflow that interprets a brownfield plant’s piping and instrumentation (P&ID) diagram and sensor data to construct a validated simulation model. Blockchain-based smart contracts can enhance supply chain coordination. This helps to reduce transaction delays and financial risks in feedstock procurement, processing, and SAF distribution, when upscaling the SAF production [239]. The Roundtable on Sustainable Biomaterials (RSB) and Bioledger piloted a blockchain database to track biofuel transactions and certifications. The implementation recorded each feedstock delivery and processing step under configurable smart contract rules that met the EU Renewable Fuel standards [196]. The pilot showed that a blockchain ledger can enforce compliance and prevent fraud, ensuring every transaction detects tampering.

4.2.5. Develop Innovative Unit Operations and Pathways

To achieve innovative unit operations and expand pathways, AI-enabled reaction modeling can help identify new SAF production methods that enhance feedstock flexibility while improving conversion efficiency [181]. For example, ML models can predict optimal reaction networks and catalytic conditions. In one study, researchers built ML models to predict key physical properties such as the boiling point and heat of combustion for thousands of organic molecules [248]. Shell used ML to monitor sensor signals, detecting deviations in temperatures and valve positions [257]. IoT sensors in SAF refining facilities can provide real-time insights into reactor conditions. This helps optimize energy use and reduce operational costs [258]. Advanced automation in SAF conversion plants improves process reliability. This allows SAF production to scale up efficiently without sacrificing quality or sustainability [259]. Neste has launched a Fintoil biorefinery in Finland that produces drop-in biofuels by utilizing pine residues [260]. They are utilizing Emerson automation capabilities to achieve peak performance. Neste’s newly established Fintoil biorefinery in Finland produces drop-in biofuels derived from pine residues. The system employs an Emerson automation suite to optimize performance [260].

4.3. Building Supply Chains

Industry 4.0 technologies are key to establishing optimum, scalable, low-emission SAF supply chains. Agility of stakeholder collaboration, selection of optimal supply chain modeling, risk avoidance, and large-scale production infrastructure development will be realized through Industry 4.0 technologies. Regional stakeholders build coalitions created on blockchain and deployed on cloud computing. This enables transparent collaboration and secure transactions between feedstock suppliers, refiners, and airlines. For example, blockchain smart contracts are programmed to automate agreements and real-time sustainability certification to build trust between SAF producers and users. Cloud-based platforms provide real-time information about feedstock availability, refinery capacity, and airport demand. This facilitates data exchange and decisions. AI-driven approacheswill enhance the accuracy of policy analysis and investment expectations regarding SAF. This allows stakeholders to evaluate the effect of regulatory incentives on SAF acceptance in different areas. Also, digital twins can help simulate a prospective SAF supply chain and its performance before implementing and locating its operational components.

4.3.1. Establish Regional Stakeholder Coalitions

This action area is about creating partnerships between feedstock providers, refiners, airlines, and policymakers to help actively develop supply chains for SAFs. Also, blockchain can improve SAF traceability when documenting its entire travel from feedstock to distribution by 30% [238]. This can reduce fraud and lead to higher regulatory compliance. For instance, Shell’s Avelia platform uses blockchain to provide clear and transparent tracking of SAF’s environmental attributes and to prevent double-counting of emissions credits [261]. By embedding agreed trust rules into the blockchain, all supply chain partners (from farmers and refineries to airlines and shippers) co-define and validate each transaction [196]. This effectively builds a system of consensus and embedded trust that aligns the coalition’s incentives. Cloud-based platforms provide a common real-time information backbone for SAF ecosystems. This implementation enables the ease of exchange of critical metrics such as fuel and inventory levels, fuel volume, and emissions intensity across value chain partners [262]. Microsoft Cloud Logistics, working with DB Schenker, exemplifies this in SAF supply chains [263]. Their pilot integrates SAF procurement, routing, and sustainability dashboards across companies to support coordinated decision-making and emissions tracking. According to IATA, a robust traceability framework, such as blockchain on a cloud platform, is essential for ensuring accurate SAF accounting in mixed fuel batches [264].

4.3.2. Model SAF Supply Chains

To develop and disseminate data and analytical tools, big data and AI are deployed to optimize feedstock sourcing, refinery site selection, and transportation logistics [20,265,266]. This ensures cost-effective and low-carbon supply chain pathways. In a case study related to the central Vietnam region, Duc and Nananukul [267] used an integrated methodology combining ML algorithms and optimization models to optimize the performance of a biomass supply chain. For example, airlines and fuel distributors can apply AI-based demand forecasting models to stabilize SAF supply, while also reducing transportation constraints [268]. Utilizing IoT sensors and edge computing facilitates the collection of real-time information from farms, refineries, and airports, can provide data on feedstock inventory, processes for fuel blending, and the efficiency of distribution [269]. With the data collected from sensors, edge computing ensures immediate data processing at the source [209]. This enables faster adjustments in logistics and refinery operations.

4.3.3. Demonstration of Regional SAF Supply Chains

As part of feedstock-to-fueling demonstration projects, Industry 4.0 can enable the de-risking and maturation of SAF production technologies before commercial deployment. AI-driven process optimization refines pilot plant operations, ensuring biomass-to-fuel conversion processes reach maximum efficiency before scaling. Biomass-to-fuel pilot facilities (e.g., NREL’s Integrated Biorefinery Research Facility) provide scaled-down biorefinery units such as hydrolysis and fermentation tanks. These units allow operators to gather process data and tune conditions before full-scale SAF production [270]. H. Wang et al. [271] built a validated artificial neural network (ANN) model of a pilot-scale (ton/day) entrained-flow gasifier. They trained the ANN on simulated pilot data and then used it in multi-objective optimizations to find operating conditions that maximize carbon conversion and hydrogen output. Cyber-physical systems in automated SAF processing can further enhance reliability by self-learning and adjusting processing parameters dynamically [249]. This minimizes inefficiencies during scaling. Additionally, 3D printing (additive manufacturing) accelerates technology deployment by enabling the rapid development of custom reactor components, catalysts, and fuel processing equipment tailored for SAF conversion pathways [272]. Borges et al. [273] demonstrated 3D printing a micro-structured catalytic stirring system for biodiesel production. It shows how 3D printing enables high mechanical strength and reusability. These capabilities accelerate technology deployment for custom components in biofuel production, including SAF.

4.3.4. Develop a Production Infrastructure to Support SAF Deployment in the Industry

Industry 4.0 technologies provide automated solutions for refining, blending, and distribution to ensure successful investment in commercial-scale SAF production infrastructure [249,266,274]. Honeywell deployed its automation suite at a large SAF biorefinery to provide real-time monitoring and control of complex conversion processes [275]. The system optimized performance and minimized downtime. Industrial robotics improve operational efficiency by automating critical fuel processing, storage, and blending systems to ensure consistent SAF quality [276]. Schneider Electric notes that modern biorefineries track Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) and automate batch operations via integrated supervisory control data acquisition (SCADA) and distributed control system (DCS) platforms (Emerson Electric Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) [277]. This enables consistent blend quality and automated sampling. AI-powered predictive maintenance enhances refinery and distribution reliability by detecting potential failures, thereby reducing downtime and increasing SAF output [278]. In their study, Arinze et al. [279] noted the increasingly broader possibilities for facilitating reliability and cost savings in predictive maintenance of energy infrastructure like oil and gas facilities, mainly due to AI applications. Additionally, blockchain-based carbon tracking systems provide transparent carbon accounting and regulatory compliance for airlines, refineries, and policy regulators, ensuring CORSIA and other SAF mandates are met [280,281]. Yi [188] highlighted blockchain’s use in biofuel supply chains for transparency and traceability, which can extend to SAF.

4.4. Policy and Valuation

To maximize the social, economic, and environmental benefits of SAF under a multidimensional valuation framework, prioritizing robust policy and valuation is vital. In addition, the use of Industry 4.0 technology and advances in these technologies can help support better data-driven policy making and more evaluative economics. It can clarify the valuations of SAFs by providing data processing through AI-based analytics, blockchain protocols for transparent data sharing, and digital modeling methods. These technologies supplement three primary focus areas in the policy and valuation analysis workstream as they provide accurate, evidence-based conclusions for use by policymakers at the federal, state, and international levels.

4.4.1. Improve the Environmental Data and Models for SAF

Under the creation of more robust environmental and socio-economic datasets and analytical tools, big data, IoT, and AI provide capacity for real-time environmental assessments. This will help policymakers understand SAF’s carbon mitigation dimensions, land use changes, and economic value [282]. AI models used for real-time predictive modeling are also being used for dynamic LCA that combine instant feedback on feedstock sourcing, energy intensity and carbon emissions [222]. It is important to note that the enhanced accuracy ability is due to the advanced data integration. AI can also model the source of feedstocks and emissions dynamically and will provide more accurate and confident decisions [283].
Additionally, blockchain-based sustainability tracking ensures transparent verification of SAF’s environmental benefits, helping stakeholders comply with regulatory frameworks like CORSIA and the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) [188,196]. Furthermore, by applying blockchain to carbon tracking, stakeholders can transparently account for emissions reductions [281]. Cloud-based policy simulation platforms also allow regulators to test different policy scenarios. This will optimize incentive structures and carbon pricing mechanisms for SAF expansion. By running policy simulations in the cloud, authorities can test carbon pricing rules, subsidy levels, blending mandates, and other levers on a virtual SAF market. For example, a European project (PolicyCLOUD) demonstrated a serverless cloud framework that lets analysts simulate and compare alternative policies before implementation [284]. Similarly, the DOE/NREL Engage tool is a cloud-based energy simulator with a browser-based interface that manages data and scenarios in the cloud [285]. This system enables stakeholders to model grid and fuel transitions collaboratively.

4.4.2. Conduct Techno-Economic and Production Feasibility Analysis

For techno-economic and production potential analyses, AI-driven economic modeling can assess cost-competitiveness, feedstock pricing trends, and infrastructure investment needs across different SAF pathways [185]. A framework using ML for techno-economic evaluations of SAF is proposed by C. Wu et al. [185]. They used a stochastic analysis to investigate the likelihood of loss, demonstrating AI’s ability to comprehend and control the economic risks related to SAF routes. In another study, He et al. [20] underlined the role of ML in optimizing transesterification processes and predicting biodiesel yield when performing techno-economic analyses. They emphasized that ML models can predict fuel properties with high accuracy (R2 = 0.85 to 0.99) and contribute to cost reduction by shortening technology development time and supporting process optimization. Digital twins simulate SAF production at varying scales to identify bottlenecks and cost reduction opportunities before real-world implementation [286,287]. Muldbak et al. [288] developed a digital twin of a pilot bioproduction plant that uses two-way data exchange to link real-time plant data with simulation models. The implementation enabled virtual testing of process changes, prediction of production bottlenecks, and suggested optimizations prior to physical implementation.
Policymakers can gain real-time cost and performance data through edge computing-enabled refinery sensors, enhancing their economic feasibility assessments [133]. This allows policymakers and analysts to use live data streams for immediate refinement of economic models, thereby improving their accuracy. By incorporating up-to-date operational conditions without delays, these sensors improve the accuracy of feasibility assessments. Meanwhile, automated data processing platforms streamline the integration of economic, environmental, and supply chain variables. This integration helps identify the most viable SAF production models [38]. For instance, a DOE-sponsored project is releasing a web-based toolkit that unifies techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) models for multi-input biorefineries [270]. Ficili et al. [289] describes automated platforms operating with massive datasets to improve supply chain optimizations. Similar opportunities exist for SAF, if these platforms can integrate feedstock prices, environmental costs, and supply chain features into techno-economic analyses.

4.4.3. Contribute to SAF Policy Development

Informing SAF policy development requires AI-enabled policy evaluation tools to analyze historical data and forecast the long-term impacts of SAF incentives, subsidies, and regulatory frameworks [290]. In climate finance research, ML methods have successfully uncovered non-linear policy effects and provided predictive insights to anticipate impacts of financial and regulatory policies, such as sequencing of green credits or tax rules [291]. Yar et al. [292] discuss the impact of AI advancements on public policy by providing opportunities for decision-making improvements and data-driven insights, especially through enhanced policy prediction capabilities.
Blockchain-enhanced governance platforms ensure transparency in SAF credit trading systems, tax incentives, and compliance tracking [164,293]. This approach helps with mitigating fraud and ensuring equitable access to incentives. In practice, a blockchain-based certificate scheme records each credit transaction (issuer, buyer, quantity) on-chain, providing regulators and auditors a tamper-proof trail [294,295]. Also, smart contracts can auto-issue and settle SAF or biofuel certificates when fuel is produced or blended [294]. Swinkels [296] explores trading voluntary carbon credits on a blockchain-based exchange, which is analogous to SAF credit trading. Additionally, cloud-based collaboration networks can enable federal, state, and international policymakers to share best practices and coordinate regulatory frameworks for SAF expansion. For instance, the EU’s federated-system approach for the flexible and interoperable energy communities (FEDECOM) project is developing a cloud-based platform for integrated local energy systems and cross-border energy trading [297]. The system will provide centralized data, analytics, and communication for policymakers to harmonize standards and update regulations in real time.

4.5. Enabling End Use

Facilitating the widespread adoption and integration of SAF among civil and military users requires overcoming technical, regulatory, and logistical barriers. Industry 4.0 technologies can help accelerate SAF evaluation, support performance testing, sort distribution logistics, and enable infrastructure integration through AI-driven analytics, blockchain-enabled tracking, automation, and advanced manufacturing techniques. These technologies play a critical role in addressing the four key action areas in the enabling end use workstream, ensuring safe, efficient, and cost-effective deployment of SAF while meeting the aviation industry standards.

4.5.1. Support SAF Evaluation, Testing, Qualification, and Specification

For SAF evaluation, testing, qualification, and specification, AI can optimize fuel performance modeling to reduce the reliance on costly experiments [298]. In the aviation arena, He et al. [20] emphasized that ML-based technologies can shorten technology development time and support process optimization for certified aviation fuels. Baumann and Klingauf [299] used ML to develop fuel flow models based on full-flight data, which can be applied to SAF to optimize fuel performance and reduce physical testing. Digital twins simulate SAF combustion and engine compatibility under varying conditions [239]. This can help accelerate desirable certifications while minimizing testing costs for producers. Researchers at NREL use digital twins to study SAF combustion in jet engines, which is crucial for engine compatibility and certification [300]. Airbus, for instance, uses digital twins to plan, experiment, and run operations, such as simulating fuel performance and compatibility with the engine [301]. Besides, lab robots can mechanize fuel property analysis to ensure that SAF meets regulatory standards more effectively. Such automation lessens the scope for error and the need for constant testing, with each step and result traceable, a huge benefit for compliance with quality requirements by policymakers [302]. Blockchain digital certification systems can further enhance traceability and evidence of compliance [280]. This reduces the administrative burden for SAF producers seeking certification. The Energy Web Foundation and the Rocky Mountain Institute built a blockchain-based SAF certificate (SAFc) registry to increase transparency and promote the use of more sustainable fuels [244].

4.5.2. Facilitate the Adoption of Unblended and High-Percentage SAF Blends, Including up to 100% SAF

AI-driven chemical analysis enhances SAF blend optimization, ensuring fuel stability and performance across different aircraft models [20]. Jameel and Gani [303] demonstrated that an AI-driven hybrid model ensures the consistent achievement of critical end-product characteristics, such as viscosity and density, in fuel blending. This reduces off-specification fuel production. In another study, Liu and Yang [304] used an ANN model to predict the low flammability limit of SAF blends with 98.8% accuracy.
Cyber-physical systems (CPSs) in refinery operations allow real-time adjustments to SAF composition. This ensures that blends meet energy density, thermal stability, and viscosity standards. Digital optimization studies, such as those varying distillation cut points, demonstrate that computational control significantly increases SAF yield while adhering to operational limits [305]. By integrating sensors, controllers, and optimization algorithms in a cyber-physical setup, refineries can dynamically tailor SAF composition to meet specific energy density and stability requirements [303]. Advanced sensor networks in aircraft fuel systems can monitor SAF combustion efficiency in real time, supporting long-term performance data collection to evaluate SAF usage [306]. Airbus reported using multiple probes and sensors to gather in-flight emissions data from an A350’s engines operating on 100% SAF [307].

4.5.3. Explore Synthetic Jet Fuels That Enhance Operational Performance and Productivity

Exploring Jet A fuel derivatives for performance and productivity enhancements requires advanced AI-driven fuel formulation models that can formulate molecular structures with higher energy density and lower emissions [308]. Kuzhagaliyeva et al. [308] developed a deep learning framework to generate gasoline-like fuel mixtures with optimized combustion metrics. Their approach produced high-octane blends that reduce engine-out soot and improve efficiency. A study by Park and Kang [258] employed ANN to predict SAF’s volume swell characteristics. This is a crucial property for blend compatibility and optimizing SAF blends for various aircraft models. 3D printing can improve combustion efficiency and reduce wear on aircraft engines by creating customized fuel additives, often nanoparticle-based or novel organometallic compounds [309]. Additionally, 3D printing plays an essential role in creating customized engine hardware that works in tandem with fuel additives. For example, the GE Catalyst turboprop engine employed 3D-printed, optimized combustion components and fuel injectors to achieve an estimated 5% reduction in engine weight and an estimated 1% better fuel efficiency [310]. In addition, high-throughput experimentation platforms in laboratory facilities dedicated to SAF research are capable of accelerating testing of fuel properties [311]. This can enable the rapid development of next-generation SAF derivatives with superior performance characteristics. Such automation can greatly speed up the testing of fuel blends and catalysts to enable rapid optimization of high-performance SAF formulations [311,312]

4.5.4. Adapt Fuel Infrastructure to Support the Distribution and Use of SAF

IoT-enabled smart fuel monitoring systems can optimize storage conditions and blend precision in large-scale fuel depots, integrating SAF into the fuel distribution infrastructure. SAF supply chain distribution networks can be streamlined by AI-driven logistics platforms, which also lessen bottlenecks in airport delivery and blending. SAF disruptions in the fuel supply chain may be diminished by using blockchain-based fuel tracking systems to ensure real-time transparency and authentication of the SAF shipments. Predictive maintenance algorithms have the potential to significantly enhance the reliability of airports’ fuel storage and SAF pipeline networks, while also effectively minimizing disruptions in the SAF supply chain.

4.6. Communicating Progress and Building Support

The benefits of SAF, including environmental, economic, and climate advantages, must be clearly communicated and promoted through effective public engagement [313]. To ensure trust and transparency in SAF supply chains, data-driven communication strategies need to be employed [314]. Industry 4.0 technologies, such as AI-driven data analytics, blockchain transparency tools, and digital outreach platforms, can enhance stakeholder engagement, public trust, and progress measurements. These technologies improve each key action area under this workstream toward the commercialization of SAF by delivering accurate, real-time, and verifiable information.

4.6.1. Engage Stakeholders to Promote Awareness and Collaboration on Sustainable Feedstock Practices

For stakeholder outreach and engagement on sustainability, AI-driven data visualization platforms can present clear, interactive insights on the sustainability impacts of SAF. These include life cycle GHG emissions reductions, land use efficiency, and energy savings [315,316,317]. Suggested by Ahmed [315], AR and VR coupled with AI technologies can provide virtual training and collaborative environments for the stakeholders. Since 2015, blockchain technology has addressed the transparency limitations of traditional supply chain tracking by overcoming single points of trust and enhancing inter-organizational confidence [318]. Blockchain technology guarantees that SAF sustainability metrics can be tracked transparently so that stakeholders can validate the sustainability of feedstocks, carbon offsets for available resources, and compliance with environmental requirements [225,314]. Cloud-based collaboration tools facilitate the real-time sharing of knowledge among scientists, industry leaders, and policymakers in real time. The result is a more effective partnership for sustainable aviation initiatives that results in better outcomes. For example, LanzaJet [319] has expanded its partnership with Microsoft to optimize the production and supply chains of SAF aircraft using Azure’s cloud-based AI and ML tools (Version 2023, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA). Announced in April 2024, this partnership will allow stakeholders to share emissions, operations, sustainability metrics, and any other information auditable and in real time. This effort ensures trust, compliance with regulations, and global collaborations.

4.6.2. Carry out a Comprehensive Assessment of the Benefits and Influence of the SAF Grand Challenge

To support benefits assessment and impact analysis of the SAF Grand Challenge, big data analytics and AI-driven simulation models can evaluate SAF’s long-term economic, environmental, and policy impacts. [320,321]. For example, Okolie et al. [322] developed a data-driven techno-economic framework for SAF production to predict the minimum selling price of pyrolysis-derived SAF from feedstock and plant parameters. Providing important features such as scenario modeling of SAF adoption, digital twins can help stakeholders with a better understanding of expected emissions, costs, supply chain risks, and infrastructure needs [323]. Enderle et al. [323] mentioned that by incorporating uncertainties, the digital twin provides a risk-informed decision support in real time, such as how the optimal SAF choice may change when considering uncertainty bounds. Automated AI-generated reports can synthesize large datasets [324]. This will ensure that stakeholders and policymakers have access to science-backed, data-driven insights to guide decision-making. Emerging AI-driven reporting systems, such as natural language summaries and predictive visualizations, could further help synthesize these big datasets.

4.6.3. Track the Advancement of the SAF Grand Challenge Objectives

For measuring the progress of the SAF Grand Challenge, IoT-enabled data collection systems tracked SAF production volumes, GHG emissions reductions, and supply chain efficiency metrics in real time [325]. For instance, Emerson used gas analysis sensors across the SAF processes to overcome measurement challenges in SAF production [326].
Blockchain tracking systems secure the integrity of data and eliminate downstream manipulation. This strengthens the amenability for progress reports and sustainability claims [238]. Alevia, a blockchain-powered book and claim solution for aviation, enables freight forwarders to access and assign SAF environmental qualities to their shipping clients [327,328]. This facilitates the disclosure of emissions and encourages a wider adoption of SAF. The system enables freight forwarders to access and allocate SAF environmental attributes to their shipping customers, and allows both parties to disclose emissions while supporting broader SAF adoption. Cloud-based dashboards and AI-enabled benchmarking tools provide real-time updates on SAF deployment. This allows industry leaders to identify barriers or challenges to optimize the strategy for reaching their SAF production ambitions. Boeing [329] used a public SAF dashboard coupled with the U.S. inter-agency metrics site on a cloud-based platform to monitor possible SAF availability and detect imbalance in supply and demand.

4.6.4. Share the Positive Impacts of the SAF Grand Challenge with the Broader Community

To communicate public benefits effectively, AI-driven digital media tools can generate personalized educational content for different audiences. This spans policymakers, industry leaders, and the general public. For example, a report by Wheelock [330] showed how AI could create educational materials for aviation that could communicate public benefits effectively. Also, AR and VR experiences can bring SAF supply chains to life, allowing stakeholders to visualize the journey from feedstock sourcing to SAF-powered flights [170]. Additionally, social media sentiment analysis powered by AI can track public perception of SAF. This can help industry leaders address concerns and misinformation with fact-based, transparent communication [331]. Alahmari et al. [332] developed and tested an AI-based approach, word embedding and clustering, to study the service sector by taking important factors from both academic research and public opinion. Their results offered implications on how to render service economies more sustainably.

5. Conclusions

This review outlined the disruptive potential of Industry 4.0 technologies in aiding advancements towards the commercialization of SAF. It highlighted how the various technology dimensions play a critical role in overcoming the existing difficulties related to production efficiency, regulatory approval, supply chain sustainability, and stakeholder engagement. These dimensions are blockchain, AI, IoT, 3D printing, and simulations such as digital twins, AR, and VR. This analysis demonstrates that these technological dimensions offer powerful tools for accelerating SAF production and adoption. Moreover, this study aligns with SDG 13 as it clarifies pathways that can help the aviation sector accelerate its transition to carbon neutrality.
Overall results indicate that both AI-based analytics and IoT-based monitoring can meaningfully improve feedstock innovation by optimizing growing conditions, managing biomass sustainably, and improving logistics. In the area of conversion technology innovation, the study shows that digital twins and automation significantly reduce scale-up risks and improve operational efficiencies. This leads to acceleration in ASTM certification processes, which is critical for the rapid deployment of SAF, improving transparency and trust among stakeholders.
This research emphasizes the important role of Industry 4.0 technologies in policy formulation and valuation. It shows how AI-powered predictive models and scenario planning tools enable policymakers and industry stakeholders to make informed, data-driven decisions regarding SAF investments and incentives. Moreover, various ways that could employ AR and VR technologies to enhance stakeholder education and public outreach were presented.
Industry 4.0 integration into the SAF supply chain requires collaboration among its different stakeholders. Policymakers and regulatory agencies need to determine supportive incentives and certification frameworks that can accelerate the adoption. Technology developers and solution providers are also responsible for scalable, cost-effective tools that are also needed for SAF infrastructure. A key component of the implementation of these technologies is the suppliers of raw materials, refineries, and airlines that test, validate, and implement them. Researchers and investors should support the commercialization of SAF by providing expertise and funding, as well as innovation and feasibility assessments.
Despite the potential shown in the literature and case studies, there are technological gaps. These consist of the demand for more integration and interoperability of various digital technologies throughout the SAF production ecosystem, better cost-effectiveness of sophisticated sensors and digital infrastructure, as well as stronger frameworks for addressing cybersecurity and data privacy issues in IoT and blockchain applications. Filling these gaps will harness the complete potential of Industry 4.0 to achieve the ambitious targets of the SAF Grand Challenge initiative. Furthermore, digital platforms that connect feedstock suppliers, biorefineries, and airline customers can function as ecosystem-based business models that promote scalability and shared value. These digitally enabled business models can increase the added value across the SAF supply chain and offer economic incentives for broader adoption. Yet, many of these efforts are in their early stages of development, such as research, piloting, or demonstration. Future research should explore structuring and governing models that balance profitability, sustainability, and regulatory compliance. Moreover, future research can further explore technology readiness level assessments for the application of Industry 4.0 technologies in SAF production and its supply chains.
This review study is based on published works that may over-represent certain Industry 4.0 technologies, such as blockchain and AI, as well as regions with more advanced SAF programs and established related regulations, such as North America and Europe. Therefore, the generalizability of this proposed framework may be limited by not considering under-reported technologies or emerging efforts in other regions.
In conclusion, Industry 4.0 technologies play a strategic role in accelerating the commercialization of SAF. The aviation industry requires ongoing research and investments in emerging technologies, which can aid in fulfilling international climate commitments aligned with SDG targets. This review offers a reference point for policymakers, industry players, and technology developers to advance practical pathways for achieving a sustainable, reliable, and cost-effective scale-up of SAF production.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.E.; methodology, S.E. and J.C.; validation, R.B., J.S. and J.M.; investigation, S.E. and J.C.; data curation, S.E. and J.C.; writing—original draft preparation, S.E.; writing—review and editing, J.C., R.B., J.S. and J.M.; visualization, S.E. and J.C.; supervision, S.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chireshe, F.; Petersen, A.M.; Ravinath, A.; Mnyakeni, L.; Ellis, G.; Viljoen, H.; Vienings, E.; Wessels, C.; Stafford, W.H.L.; Bole-Rentel, T.; et al. Cost-Effective Sustainable Aviation Fuel: Insights from a Techno-Economic and Logistics Analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 210, 115157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Staples, M.D.; Malina, R.; Suresh, P.; Hileman, J.I.; Barrett, S.R.H. Aviation CO2 Emissions Reductions from the Use of Alternative Jet Fuels. Energy Policy 2018, 114, 342–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. World Economic Forum Aviation’s Flight Path to a Net-Zero Future. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2021/09/aviation-flight-path-to-net-zero-future/ (accessed on 27 May 2025).
  4. Williams, D. 2021 United States Aviation Climate Action Plan; The Federal Aviation Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  5. Cui, Q.; Chen, B. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Using Sustainable Aviation Fuels in South America. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 435, 140556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Khazaei, M.; Gholian-Jouybari, F.; Davari Dolatabadi, M.; Pourebrahimi Alamdari, A.; Eskandari, H.; Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, M. Renewable Energy Portfolio in Mexico for Industry 5.0 and SDGs: Hydrogen, Wind, or Solar? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 213, 115420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. United Nations THE 17 GOALS|Sustainable Development. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/goals (accessed on 8 August 2025).
  8. Biancardi, A.; Califano, F.; D’Adamo, I.; Gastaldi, M.; Kostakis, I. A Distributed and Sustainable Model for Future Cities: A Profitability Analysis of Integrated Photovoltaic Systems with Storage under Different Incentive Policies. Energy Policy 2025, 205, 114691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Basilico, P.; Biancardi, A.; D’Adamo, I.; Gastaldi, M.; Stornelli, V. Socioeconomic Dimensions of Renewable Energy Communities: Pathways to Collective Well-Being. Util. Policy 2025, 96, 102000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Louman, B.; Keenan, R.J.; Kleinschmit, D.; Atmadja, S.; Sitoe, A.A.; Nhantumbo, I.; Velozo, R.d.C.; Morales, J.P. SDG 13: Climate Action–Impacts on Forests and People. In Sustainable Development Goals: Their Impacts on Forests and People; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2019; pp. 419–444. ISBN 978-1-108-48699-6. [Google Scholar]
  11. Church, J.A.; White, N.J. A 20th Century Acceleration in Global Sea-Level Rise. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2006, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Beier, G.; Niehoff, S.; Hoffmann, M. Industry 4.0: A Step towards Achieving the SDGs? A Critical Literature Review. Discov. Sustain. 2021, 2, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Arafat, M.Y.; Hossain, M.J.; Alam, M.M. Machine Learning Scopes on Microgrid Predictive Maintenance: Potential Frameworks, Challenges, and Prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 190, 114088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bhagwan, N.; Evans, M. A Review of Industry 4.0 Technologies Used in the Production of Energy in China, Germany, and South Africa. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2023, 173, 113075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Frank, A.G.; Dalenogare, L.S.; Ayala, N.F. Industry 4.0 Technologies: Implementation Patterns in Manufacturing Companies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 210, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ghobakhloo, M.; Iranmanesh, M.; Fathi, M.; Rejeb, A.; Foroughi, B.; Nikbin, D. Beyond Industry 4.0: A Systematic Review of Industry 5.0 Technologies and Implications for Social, Environmental and Economic Sustainability. Asia Pac. J. Bus. Adm. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ivanov, D. The Industry 5.0 Framework: Viability-Based Integration of the Resilience, Sustainability, and Human-Centricity Perspectives. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2023, 61, 1683–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Olsen, T.L.; Tomlin, B. Industry 4.0: Opportunities and Challenges for Operations Management. Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2019, 22, 1–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sharma, M.; Sehrawat, R.; Luthra, S.; Daim, T.; Bakry, D. Moving Towards Industry 5.0 in the Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Sector: Challenges and Solutions for Germany. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2024, 71, 13757–13774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. He, X.; Wang, N.; Zhou, Q.; Huang, J.; Ramakrishna, S.; Li, F. Smart Aviation Biofuel Energy System Coupling with Machine Learning Technology. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 189, 113914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hariyani, D.; Hariyani, P.; Mishra, S. Digital Technologies for the Sustainable Development Goals. Green. Technol. Sustain. 2025, 3, 100202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Varriale, V.; Camilleri, M.A.; Cammarano, A.; Michelino, F.; Müller, J.; Strazzullo, S. Unleashing Digital Transformation to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals across Multiple Sectors. Sustain. Dev. 2025, 33, 565–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Raman, R.; Kautish, P.; Siddiqui, A.; Siddiqui, M.; Nedungadi, P. The Role of Metaverse Technologies in Energy Systems towards Sustainable Development Goals. Energy Rep. 2025, 13, 4459–4476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Magazzino, C.; Zoundi, Z. Enhancing Climate Action Evaluation Using Artificial Neural Networks: An Analysis of SDG 13. Sustain. Futures 2025, 9, 100439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Solangi, Y.A.; Magazzino, C. Evaluating Financial Implications of Renewable Energy for Climate Action and Sustainable Development Goals. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 212, 115390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kartal, M.T.; Mukhtarov, S.; Depren, Ö.; Ayhan, F.; Ulussever, T. How Can SDG-13 Be Achieved by Energy, Environment, and Economy-Related Policies? Evidence From Five Leading Emerging Countries. Sustain. Dev. 2025, 33, 5110–5133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. He, X.; Khan, S.; Ozturk, I.; Murshed, M. The Role of Renewable Energy Investment in Tackling Climate Change Concerns: Environmental Policies for Achieving SDG-13. Sustain. Dev. 2023, 31, 1888–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. DOE; USDA; DOT; EPA. Sustainable Aviation Fuel Grand Challenge Roadmap: Flight Plan for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Report; 2022. Available online: https://biomassboard.gov/sustainable-aviation-fuel-grand-challenge-roadmap (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  29. CFR Clean Fuel Regulations. Available online: https://gazette.gc.ca/rp-pr/p2/2022/2022-07-06/html/sor-dors140-eng.html (accessed on 5 July 2025).
  30. SkyNRG. Sustainable Aviation Fuel Arke Outlook; SkyNRG: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  31. MBIE. SAF Consortium Roadmap; New Zealand’s Ministry of Business, Innovation & Employment: Wellington, New Zealand, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  32. MOEI. National Sustainable Aviation Fuel Roadmap of the United Arab Emirates; GCAA: Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  33. CSIRO. Sustainable Aviation Fuel Roadmap; Australia’s National Science Agency: Black Mountain, ACT, Australia, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  34. CASS. Singapore Sustainable Air Hub Blueprint; Civil Aviation Authority of Singapore: Singapore, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  35. D’Adamo, I.; Gastaldi, M.; Nallapaneni, M.K. Europe Moves toward Pragmatic Sustainability: A More Human and Fraternal Approach. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Grim, R.G.; Tao, L.; Abdullah, Z.; Cortright, R.; Oakleaf, B. The Challenge Ahead: A Critical Perspective on Meeting U.S. Growth Targets for Sustainable Aviation Fuel; National Renewable Energy Laboratory: Applewood, CO, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kandaramath Hari, T.; Yaakob, Z.; Binitha, N.N. Aviation Biofuel from Renewable Resources: Routes, Opportunities and Challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 1234–1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Watson, M.J.; Machado, P.G.; Da Silva, A.V.; Saltar, Y.; Ribeiro, C.O.; Nascimento, C.A.O.; Dowling, A.W. Sustainable Aviation Fuel Technologies, Costs, Emissions, Policies, and Markets: A Critical Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 449, 141472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sharno, M.A.; Hiloidhari, M. Social Sustainability of Biojet Fuel for Net Zero Aviation. Energy Sustain. Dev. 2024, 79, 101419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Inan, I.; Orhan, I.; Ekici, S. Fuel Savings Strategies for Sustainable Aviation in Accordance with United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (UN SDGs). Energy 2025, 320, 135159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. ICAO. Aviation Benefits Report-2019; ICAO: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  42. ASTM Standard Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuel Containing Synthesized Hydrocarbons. Available online: https://store.astm.org/d7566-22.html (accessed on 5 July 2025).
  43. IATA. Sustainable Aviation Fuel: Technical Certification; IATA: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  44. ICAO. Environmental Report 2013 Aviation and Climate Change; ICAO: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  45. ICAO. Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation (CORSIA); ICAO: Montreal, QC, Canada, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  46. European Parliament ReFuelEU Aviation-Sustainable Aviation Fuels|Legislative Train Schedule. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/spotlight-JD21/file-refueleu-aviation?sid=5201 (accessed on 5 July 2025).
  47. Alaska Airlines Commits to Carbon, Waste and Water Goals for 2025, Announces Path to Net Zero by 2040. Alaska Airlines News, 21 April 2021.
  48. Bergero, C.; Gosnell, G.; Gielen, D.; Kang, S.; Bazilian, M.; Davis, S.J. Pathways to Net-Zero Emissions from Aviation. Nat. Sustain. 2023, 6, 404–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Chauhan, C.; Singh, A. A Review of Industry 4.0 in Supply Chain Management Studies. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2019, 31, 863–886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Núñez-Merino, M.; Maqueira-Marín, J.M.; Moyano-Fuentes, J.; Martínez-Jurado, P.J. Information and Digital Technologies of Industry 4.0 and Lean Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 5034–5061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Weyer, S.; Schmitt, M.; Ohmer, M.; Gorecky, D. Towards Industry 4.0-Standardization as the Crucial Challenge for Highly Modular, Multi-Vendor Production Systems. IFAC-Pap. 2015, 48, 579–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Choi, T.; Kumar, S.; Yue, X.; Chan, H. Disruptive Technologies and Operations Management in the Industry 4.0 Era and Beyond. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2022, 31, 9–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Oriekhoe, O.I.; Oyeyemi, O.P.; Bello, B.G.; Omotoye, G.B.; Daraojimba, A.I.; Adefemi, A.; Oriekhoe, O.I.; Oyeyemi, O.P.; Bello, B.G.; Omotoye, G.B.; et al. Blockchain in Supply Chain Management: A Review of Efficiency, Transparency, and Innovation. Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch. 2024, 11, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Pattison, I. 4 Characteristics That Set Blockchain Apart|Architecting the Cloud. Available online: https://architectingthecloud.com/2017/04/27/4-characteristics-that-set-blockchain-apart/ (accessed on 26 June 2025).
  55. Sharabati, A.-A.A.; Jreisat, E.R. Blockchain Technology Implementation in Supply Chain Management: A Literature Review. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Park, A.; Li, H. The Effect of Blockchain Technology on Supply Chain Sustainability Performances. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rauchs, M.; Glidden, A.; Gordon, B.; Pieters, G.C.; Recanatini, M.; Rostand, F.; Vagneur, K.; Zhang, B.Z. Distributed Ledger Technology Systems: A Conceptual Framework; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  58. Kamble, S.; Gunasekaran, A.; Arha, H. Understanding the Blockchain Technology Adoption in Supply Chains-Indian Context. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 2009–2033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Balakrishnan, D.; Sharma, P.; Bora, B.J.; Dizge, N. Harnessing Biomass Energy: Advancements through Machine Learning and AI Applications for Sustainability and Efficiency. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2024, 191, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Roeck, D.; Sternberg, H.; Hofmann, E. Distributed Ledger Technology in Supply Chains: A Transaction Cost Perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 2124–2141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Morgan, T.R.; Richey, R.G., Jr.; Ellinger, A.E. Supplier Transparency: Scale Development and Validation. Int. J. Logist. Manag. 2018, 29, 959–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Brody, P. How blockchain is revolutionizing supply chain management. Digitalist Magazine, 6 September 2017. Available online: https://cryptocenternews.com/pdf/_FILE/ey-blockchain-and-the-supply-chain-three.pdf (accessed on 5 July 2025).
  63. Tönnissen, S.; Teuteberg, F. Analysing the Impact of Blockchain-Technology for Operations and Supply Chain Management: An Explanatory Model Drawn from Multiple Case Studies. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2020, 52, 101953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Cai, Y.-J.; Choi, T.-M.; Zhang, J. Platform Supported Supply Chain Operations in the Blockchain Era: Supply Contracting and Moral Hazards. Decis. Sci. 2021, 52, 866–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ethereum Solidity—Solidity 0.8.31 Documentation. Available online: https://docs.soliditylang.org/en/latest/ (accessed on 26 June 2025).
  66. Treleaven, P.; Gendal Brown, R.; Yang, D. Blockchain Technology in Finance. Computer 2017, 50, 14–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Magazzeni, D.; McBurney, P.; Nash, W. Validation and Verification of Smart Contracts: A Research Agenda. Computer 2017, 50, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Chang, Y.; Iakovou, E.; Shi, W. Blockchain in Global Supply Chains and Cross Border Trade: A Critical Synthesis of the State-of-the-Art, Challenges and Opportunities. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2020, 58, 2082–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Chang, S.E.; Chen, Y.-C.; Lu, M.-F. Supply Chain Re-Engineering Using Blockchain Technology: A Case of Smart Contract Based Tracking Process. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2019, 144, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Guo, Y.; Liang, C. Blockchain Application and Outlook in the Banking Industry. Financ. Innov. 2016, 2, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J. Blockchain Characteristics and Green Supply Chain Advancement. In Global Perspectives on Green Business Administration and Sustainable Supply Chain Management; IGI Global Scientific Publishing: Hershey, PA, USA, 2020; pp. 93–109. ISBN 978-1-7998-2173-1. [Google Scholar]
  72. Eyo-Udo, N.L.; Agho, M.O.; Onukwulu, E.C.; Sule, A.K.; Azubuike, C. Advances in Blockchain Solutions for Secure and Efficient Cross-Border Payment Systems. Int. J. Res. Innov. Appl. Sci. 2025, IX, 536–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Rachana Harish, A.; Liu, X.L.; Zhong, R.Y.; Huang, G.Q. Log-Flock: A Blockchain-Enabled Platform for Digital Asset Valuation and Risk Assessment in E-Commerce Logistics Financing. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2021, 151, 107001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kim, J.; Kim, M.; Im, S.; Choi, D. Competitiveness of E Commerce Firms through ESG Logistics. Sustainability 2021, 13, 11548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liu, X.L.; Wang, W.M.; Guo, H.; Barenji, A.V.; Li, Z.; Huang, G.Q. Industrial Blockchain Based Framework for Product Lifecycle Management in Industry 4.0. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2020, 63, 101897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Rachana Harish, A.; Liu, X.L.; Li, M.; Zhong, R.Y.; Huang, G.Q. Blockchain-Enabled Digital Assets Tokenization for Cyber-Physical Traceability in E-Commerce Logistics Financing. Comput. Ind. 2023, 150, 103956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hofmann, E.; Strewe, U.M.; Bosia, N. Supply Chain Finance and Blockchain Technology; SpringerBriefs in Finance; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; ISBN 978-3-319-62370-2. [Google Scholar]
  78. Yu, Y.; Huang, G.; Guo, X. Financing Strategy Analysis for a Multi-Sided Platform with Blockchain Technology. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2021, 59, 4513–4532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kumar, D.; Kumar, S.; Joshi, A. Assessing the Viability of Blockchain Technology for Enhancing Court Operations. Int. J. Law Manag. 2023, 65, 425–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Ali, S.M.; Rahman, A.U.; Kabir, G.; Paul, S.K. Artificial Intelligence Approach to Predict Supply Chain Performance: Implications for Sustainability. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Duan, Y.; Edwards, J.S.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Artificial Intelligence for Decision Making in the Era of Big Data–Evolution, Challenges and Research Agenda. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 48, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Brynjolfsson, E.; Mcafee, A.N.D.R.E.W. The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Bus. Rev. 2017, 7, 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  83. Harikrishnakumar, R.; Dand, A.; Nannapaneni, S.; Krishnan, K. Supervised Machine Learning Approach for Effective Supplier Classification. In Proceedings of the 2019 18th IEEE International Conference On Machine Learning And Applications (ICMLA), Boca Raton, FL, USA, 16–19 December 2019; pp. 240–245. [Google Scholar]
  84. Bastani, H.; Zhang, D.J.; Zhang, H. Applied Machine Learning in Operations Management. In Innovative Technology at the Interface of Finance and Operations: Volume I; Babich, V., Birge, J.R., Hilary, G., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 189–222. ISBN 978-3-030-75729-8. [Google Scholar]
  85. Yang, Y.; Fu, Z.-Y.; Zhan, D.-C.; Liu, Z.-B.; Jiang, Y. Semi-Supervised Multi-Modal Multi-Instance Multi-Label Deep Network with Optimal Transport. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2021, 33, 696–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Tirkolaee, E.B.; Sadeghi, S.; Mooseloo, F.M.; Vandchali, H.R.; Aeini, S. Application of Machine Learning in Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Overview of the Main Areas. Math. Probl. Eng. 2021, 2021, 1476043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Syafrudin, M.; Alfian, G.; Fitriyani, N.L.; Anshari, M. Applied Artificial Intelligence for Sustainability. Sustainability 2024, 16, 2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Baptista, M.; Gordon, M.; Herrmann, C.; Pratt, A. With Artificial Intelligence, Find New Suppliers in Days, Not Months; McKinsey&Company: Chicago, IL, USA, 2021; Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/with-artificial-intelligence-find-new-suppliers-in-days-not-months (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  89. Moshebah, O.Y.; Rodríguez-González, S.; González, A.D. A Max–Min Fairness-Inspired Approach to Enhance the Performance of Multimodal Transportation Networks. Sustainability 2024, 16, 4914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Painuly, S.; Sharma, S. Natural Language Processing Techniques for E-Healthcare Supply Chain Management System. In Proceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Emerging Systems and Intelligent Computing (ESIC), Bhubaneswar, India, 9–10 February 2024; pp. 11–16. [Google Scholar]
  91. Serna, A.; Soroa, A.; Agerri, R. Applying Deep Learning Techniques for Sentiment Analysis to Assess Sustainable Transport. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Aejas, B.; Belhi, A.; Bouras, A. Using AI to Ensure Reliable Supply Chains: Legal Relation Extraction for Sustainable and Transparent Contract Automation. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Aslam, F.; Calghan, J. Using NLP to Enhance Supply Chain Management Systems. J. Eng. Res. Rep. 2023, 25, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. D Kulkarni Saurav, N. Revolutionizing Manufacturing: The Integral Role of AI and Computer Vision in Shaping Future Industries. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2024, 13, 1183–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Tienin, B.W.; Cui, G.; Ukwuoma, C.C.; Nana, Y.A.T.; Esidang, R.M.; Moniz Moreira, E.Z. MS3Net: A Deep Ensemble Learning Approach for Ship Classification in Heterogeneous Remote Sensing Data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2024, 45, 748–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Villegas-Ch, W.; Navarro, A.M.; Sanchez-Viteri, S. Optimization of Inventory Management through Computer Vision and Machine Learning Technologies. Intell. Syst. Appl. 2024, 24, 200438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chavan, C.; Hembade, S.; Jadhav, G.; Komalwad, P.; Rawat, P. Computer Vision Application Analysis Based on Object Detection. Int. J. Sci. Res. Eng. Manag. 2023, 7, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Loce, R.P.; Bernal, E.A.; Wu, W.; Bala, R. Computer Vision in Roadway Transportation Systems: A Survey. Just Enough Items 2013, 22, 041121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhou, L.; Zhang, L.; Konz, N. Computer Vision Techniques in Manufacturing. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2023, 53, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Dilek, E.; Dener, M. Computer Vision Applications in Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Survey. Sensors 2023, 23, 2938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Stevens, W. Robotic Process Automation in Supply Chain. Eur. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2023, 1, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  102. Mahey, H. Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere: Techniques to Fuel Business Productivity and Intelligent Automation Using RPA; Packt: Birmingham, UK, 2020; ISBN 978-1-83921-656-5. [Google Scholar]
  103. Banur, O.M.; Patle, B.K.; Pawar, S. Integration of Robotics and Automation in Supply Chain: A Comprehensive Review-Extrica. Available online: https://www.extrica.com/article/23349 (accessed on 26 June 2025).
  104. Fitzgerald, J.; Quasney, E. Using autonomous robots to drive supply chain innovation. Deloitte Perspectives 2017. Available online: https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/Industries/industrial-construction/articles/autonomous-robots-supply-chain-innovation.html (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  105. Chauhan, A.; Brouwer, B.; Westra, E. Robotics for a Quality-Driven Post-Harvest Supply Chain. Curr. Robot. Rep. 2022, 3, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ribeiro, J.; Lima, R.; Eckhardt, T.; Paiva, S. Robotic Process Automation and Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0–A Literature Review. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2021, 181, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Brynjolfsson, E.; Li, D.; Raymond, L. Generative AI at Work*. Q. J. Econ. 2025, 140, 889–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jackson, I.; Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A.; Namdar, J. Generative Artificial Intelligence in Supply Chain and Operations Management: A Capability-Based Framework for Analysis and Implementation. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2024, 62, 6120–6145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Van Hoek, R.; DeWitt, M.; Lacity, M.; Johnson, T. How Walmart Automated Supplier Negotiations. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2022, 8, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  110. MIT Technology Review Procurement in the Age of AI. Available online: https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/11/28/1083628/procurement-in-the-age-of-ai/ (accessed on 26 June 2025).
  111. Richey, R.G.; Chowdhury, S.; Davis-Sramek, B.; Giannakis, M.; Dwivedi, Y.K. Artificial Intelligence in Logistics and Supply Chain Management: A Primer and Roadmap for Research. J. Bus. Logist. 2023, 44, 532–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Dwivedi, Y.K.; Hughes, L.; Ismagilova, E.; Aarts, G.; Coombs, C.; Crick, T.; Duan, Y.; Dwivedi, R.; Edwards, J.; Eirug, A.; et al. Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Emerging Challenges, Opportunities, and Agenda for Research, Practice and Policy. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2021, 57, 101994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Klumpp, M.; Ruiner, C. Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Logistics Employment: The Human Factor in Digital Logistics.|EBSCOhost. Available online: https://openurl.ebsco.com/contentitem/doi:10.1111%2Fjbl.12314?sid=ebsco:plink:crawler&id=ebsco:doi:10.1111%2Fjbl.12314 (accessed on 26 June 2025).
  114. Ashok, M.; Madan, R.; Joha, A.; Sivarajah, U. Ethical Framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2022, 62, 102433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Dwivedi, Y.K.; Pandey, N.; Currie, W.; Micu, A. Leveraging ChatGPT and Other Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)-Based Applications in the Hospitality and Tourism Industry: Practices, Challenges and Research Agenda. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2023, 36, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Pan, S.L.; Nishant, R. Artificial Intelligence for Digital Sustainability: An Insight into Domain-Specific Research and Future Directions. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2023, 72, 102668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. von Krogh, G.; Roberson, Q.; Gruber, M. Recognizing and Utilizing Novel Research Opportunities with Artificial Intelligence. Acad. Manag. J. 2023, 66, 367–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Hassini, E. Supply Chain Optimization: Current Practices and Overview of Emerging Research Opportunities. INFOR Inf. Syst. Oper. Res. 2008, 46, 93–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Khan, Y.; Su’ud, M.B.M.; Alam, M.M.; Ahmad, S.F.; Ahmad (Ayassrah), A.Y.A.B.; Khan, N. Application of Internet of Things (IoT) in Sustainable Supply Chain Management. Sustainability 2023, 15, 694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Sallam, K.; Mohamed, M.; Mohamed, A.W. Internet of Things (IoT) in Supply Chain Management: Challenges, Opportunities, and Best Practices. Sustain. Mach. Intell. J. 2023, 2, 1–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Al-Qaseemi, S.A.; Almulhim, H.A.; Almulhim, M.F.; Chaudhry, S.R. IoT Architecture Challenges and Issues: Lack of Standardization. In Proceedings of the 2016 Future Technologies Conference (FTC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 6–7 December 2016; pp. 731–738. [Google Scholar]
  122. Xu, L.D.; He, W.; Li, S. Internet of Things in Industries: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2014, 10, 2233–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lee, I.; Lee, K. The Internet of Things (IoT): Applications, Investments, and Challenges for Enterprises. Bus. Horiz. 2015, 58, 431–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rayes, A.; Salam, S. The Things in IoT: Sensors and Actuators. In Internet of Things from Hype to Reality: The Road to Digitization; Rayes, A., Salam, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 63–82. ISBN 978-3-030-90158-5. [Google Scholar]
  125. Gao, Q.; Guo, S.; Liu, X.; Manogaran, G.; Chilamkurti, N.; Kadry, S. Simulation Analysis of Supply Chain Risk Management System Based on IoT Information Platform. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2020, 14, 1354–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Subramanian, G.; Thampy, A.S. Implementation of Hybrid Blockchain in a Pre-Owned Electric Vehicle Supply Chain. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 82435–82454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Subramanian, G.; Thampy, A.S.; Ugwuoke, N.V.; Ramnani, B. Crypto Pharmacy–Digital Medicine: A Mobile Application Integrated With Hybrid Blockchain to Tackle the Issues in Pharma Supply Chain. IEEE Open J. Comput. Soc. 2021, 2, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Bhargava, A.; Bhargava, D.; Kumar, P.N.; Sajja, G.S.; Ray, S. Industrial IoT and AI Implementation in Vehicular Logistics and Supply Chain Management for Vehicle Mediated Transportation Systems. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag. 2022, 13, 673–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Alkhader, W.; Alkaabi, N.; Salah, K.; Jayaraman, R.; Arshad, J.; Omar, M. Blockchain-Based Traceability and Management for Additive Manufacturing. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 188363–188377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Maiti, A.; Raza, A.; Kang, B.H.; Hardy, L. Estimating Service Quality in Industrial Internet-of-Things Monitoring Applications With Blockchain. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 155489–155503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Verdouw, C.N.; Robbemond, R.M.; Verwaart, T.; Wolfert, J.; Beulens, A.J.M. A Reference Architecture for IoT-Based Logistic Information Systems in Agri-Food Supply Chains. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 2018, 12, 755–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Al-Rakhami, M.S.; Al-Mashari, M. A Blockchain-Based Trust Model for the Internet of Things Supply Chain Management. Sensors 2021, 21, 1759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Andriulo, F.C.; Fiore, M.; Mongiello, M.; Traversa, E.; Zizzo, V. Edge Computing and Cloud Computing for Internet of Things: A Review. Informatics 2024, 11, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Alyahya, S.; Wang, Q.; Bennett, N. Application and Integration of an RFID-Enabled Warehousing Management System–a Feasibility Study. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2016, 4, 15–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Rayes, A.; Salam, S. Internet of Things From Hype to Reality; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; ISBN 978-3-319-44858-9. [Google Scholar]
  136. Borgia, E. The Internet of Things Vision: Key Features, Applications and Open Issues. Comput. Commun. 2014, 54, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Gubbi, J.; Buyya, R.; Marusic, S.; Palaniswami, M. Internet of Things (IoT): A Vision, Architectural Elements, and Future Directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2013, 29, 1645–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Taj, S.; Imran, A.S.; Kastrati, Z.; Daudpota, S.M.; Memon, R.A.; Ahmed, J. IoT-based supply chain management: A systematic literature review. Internet Things 2023, 24, 100982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Choi, S.; Kim, B.H.; Do Noh, S. A diagnosis and evaluation method for strategic planning and systematic design of a virtual factory in smart manufacturing systems. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 2015, 16, 1107–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. O’Donovan, P.; Leahy, K.; Bruton, K.; O’Sullivan, D.T. An industrial big data pipeline for data-driven analytics maintenance applications in large-scale smart manufacturing facilities. J. Big Data 2015, 2, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Gibson, I.; Rosen, D.; Stucker, B. Direct Digital Manufacturing. In Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing; Gibson, I., Rosen, D., Stucker, B., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2015; pp. 375–397. ISBN 978-1-4939-2113-3. [Google Scholar]
  142. Rogers, H.; Baricz, N.; Pawar, K.S. 3D Printing Services: Classification, Supply Chain Implications and Research Agenda. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Amp; Logist. Manag. 2016, 46, 886–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Petrick, I.J.; Simpson, T.W. 3D Printing Disrupts Manufacturing: How Economies of One Create New Rules of Competition. Res. -Technol. Manag. 2013, 56, 12–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Kietzmann, J.; Pitt, L.; Berthon, P. Disruptions, Decisions, and Destinations: Enter the Age of 3-D Printing and Additive Manufacturing. Bus. Horiz. 2015, 58, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Holmström, J.; Partanen, J. Digital Manufacturing-Driven Transformations of Service Supply Chains for Complex Products. Supply Chain Manag. Int. J. 2014, 19, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Mohr, S.; Khan, O. 3D Printing and Its Disruptive Impacts on Supply Chains of the Future. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2015, 5, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Gress, D.R.; Kalafsky, R.V. Geographies of Production in 3D: Theoretical and Research Implications Stemming from Additive Manufacturing. Geoforum 2015, 60, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Despeisse, M.; Baumers, M.; Brown, P.; Charnley, F.; Ford, S.J.; Garmulewicz, A.; Knowles, S.; Minshall, T.H.W.; Mortara, L.; Reed-Tsochas, F.P.; et al. Unlocking Value for a Circular Economy through 3D Printing: A Research Agenda. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2017, 115, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Birtchnell, T.; Urry, J.; Cook, C.; Curry, A. Freight Miles: The Impacts of 3D Printing on Transport and Society; ES/J007455/1; ESRC Project: Swindon, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  150. Chan, H.K.; Griffin, J.; Lim, J.J.; Zeng, F.; Chiu, A.S.F. The Impact of 3D Printing Technology on the Supply Chain: Manufacturing and Legal Perspectives. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 205, 156–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Tatham, P.; Loy, J.; Peretti, U. Three Dimensional Printing–a Key Tool for the Humanitarian Logistician? J. Humanit. Logist. Supply Chain Manag. 2015, 5, 188–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Nyman, H.J.; Sarlin, P. From Bits to Atoms: 3D Printing in the Context of Supply Chain Strategies. In Proceedings of the 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 6 January 2014; pp. 4190–4199. [Google Scholar]
  153. Corsini, L.; Aranda-Jan, C.B.; Moultrie, J. The Impact of 3D Printing on the Humanitarian Supply Chain. Prod. Plan. Control 2022, 33, 692–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Huang, S.H.; Liu, P.; Mokasdar, A.; Hou, L. Additive Manufacturing and Its Societal Impact: A Literature Review. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2013, 67, 1191–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A. A Digital Supply Chain Twin for Managing the Disruption Risks and Resilience in the Era of Industry 4.0. Prod. Plan. Control 2021, 32, 775–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Abideen, A.Z.; Sundram, V.P.K.; Pyeman, J.; Othman, A.K.; Sorooshian, S. Digital Twin Integrated Reinforced Learning in Supply Chain and Logistics. Logistics 2021, 5, 84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Židek, K.; Piteľ, J.; Adámek, M.; Lazorík, P.; Hošovský, A. Digital Twin of Experimental Smart Manufacturing Assembly System for Industry 4.0 Concept. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Fuller, A.; Fan, Z.; Day, C.; Barlow, C. Digital Twin: Enabling Technologies, Challenges and Open Research. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 108952–108971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Qazi, A.M.; Mahmood, S.H.; Haleem, A.; Bahl, S.; Javaid, M.; Gopal, K. The Impact of Smart Materials, Digital Twins (DTs) and Internet of Things (IoT) in an Industry 4.0 Integrated Automation Industry. Mater. Today: Proc. 2022, 62, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Akbari, M.; Ha, N.; Kok, S. A Systematic Review of AR/VR in Operations and Supply Chain Management: Maturity, Current Trends and Future Directions. J. Glob. Oper. Strateg. Sourc. 2022, 15, 534–565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Qi, Q.; Tao, F. Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 3585–3593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Viola, J.; Chen, Y. Digital Twin Enabled Smart Control Engineering as an Industrial AI: A New Framework and Case Study. In Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Industrial Artificial Intelligence (IAI), Shenyang, China, 23–25 October 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  163. Halenar, I.; Juhas, M.; Juhasova, B.; Borkin, D. Virtualization of Production Using Digital Twin Technology. In Proceedings of the 2019 20th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), Wieliczka, Poland, 26–29 May 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  164. Javaid, M.; Haleem, A.; Singh, R.P.; Suman, R.; Khan, S. A Review of Blockchain Technology Applications for Financial Services. BenchCouncil Trans. Benchmarks Stand. Eval. 2022, 2, 100073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Joseph, A.J.; Kruger, K.; Basson, A.H. An Aggregated Digital Twin Solution for Human-Robot Collaboration in Industry 4.0 Environments. In Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future; Borangiu, T., Trentesaux, D., Leitão, P., Cardin, O., Lamouri, S., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 135–147. [Google Scholar]
  166. Agnusdei, G.P.; Elia, V.; Gnoni, M.G. Is Digital Twin Technology Supporting Safety Management? A Bibliometric and Systematic Review. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 2767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Roy, R.B.; Mishra, D.; Pal, S.K.; Chakravarty, T.; Panda, S.; Chandra, M.G.; Pal, A.; Misra, P.; Chakravarty, D.; Misra, S. Digital Twin: Current Scenario and a Case Study on a Manufacturing Process. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 107, 3691–3714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Santos, C.H.D.; De Queiroz, J.A.; Leal, F.; Montevechi, J.A.B. Use of Simulation in the Industry 4.0 Context: Creation of a Digital Twin to Optimise Decision Making on Non-Automated Process. J. Simul. 2022, 16, 284–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Rejeb, A.; Keogh, J.G.; Wamba, S.F.; Treiblmaier, H. The Potentials of Augmented Reality in Supply Chain Management: A State-of-the-Art Review. Manag. Rev. Q. 2021, 71, 819–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. WEF Innovations in Sustainability: XR in Business and Climate Strategies. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2024/09/xr-technologies-redefining-business-climate-strategies-innovation/ (accessed on 7 July 2025).
  171. Whittemore, R.; Knafl, K. The Integrative Review: Updated Methodology. J. Adv. Nurs. 2005, 52, 546–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Snyder, H. Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Torraco, R.J. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Guidelines and Examples. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2005, 4, 356–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. MacInnis, D.J. A Framework for Conceptual Contributions in Marketing. J. Mark. 2011, 75, 136–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Torraco, R.J. Writing Integrative Literature Reviews: Using the Past and Present to Explore the Future. Hum. Resour. Dev. Rev. 2016, 15, 404–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Pansare, R.; Yadav, G.; Nagare, M.R. Reconfigurable Manufacturing System: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis and Future Research Agenda. J. Manuf. Technol. Manag. 2021, 33, 543–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Kohtala, C. Addressing Sustainability in Research on Distributed Production: An Integrated Literature Review. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 106, 654–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Flick, U. An Introduction to Qualitative Research, 5th ed.; Sage: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2014; ISBN 978-1-4462-6778-3. [Google Scholar]
  179. Nkoana, E.M.; Verbruggen, A.; Hugé, J. Climate Change Adaptation Tools at the Community Level: An Integrated Literature Review. Sustainability 2018, 10, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Martinez-Valencia, L.; Garcia-Perez, M.; Wolcott, M.P. Supply Chain Configuration of Sustainable Aviation Fuel: Review, Challenges, and Pathways for Including Environmental and Social Benefits. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 152, 111680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Liao, M.; Yao, Y. Applications of Artificial Intelligence-Based Modeling for Bioenergy Systems: A Review. GCB Bioenergy 2021, 13, 774–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Jahin, M.A.; Shovon, M.S.H.; Shin, J.; Ridoy, I.A.; Mridha, M.F. Big Data—Supply Chain Management Framework for Forecasting: Data Preprocessing and Machine Learning Techniques. Arch. Comput. Methods Eng. 2024, 31, 3619–3645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Xu, J.; Pero, M.E.P.; Ciccullo, F.; Sianesi, A. On Relating Big Data Analytics to Supply Chain Planning: Towards a Research Agenda. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2021, 51, 656–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Zamani, E.D.; Smyth, C.; Gupta, S.; Dennehy, D. Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Analytics for Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review. Ann. Oper. Res. 2023, 327, 605–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Wu, C.; Wang, Y.; Tao, L. Machine Learning-Enabled Techno-Economic Uncertainty Analysis of Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production Pathways. Chem. Eng. J. Adv. 2024, 20, 100650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. World Economic Forum How Can AI Make Aviation More Sustainable? Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/11/3-ways-ai-can-revolutionize-sustainable-aviation/ (accessed on 7 June 2025).
  187. Ronaghi, M.H. A Blockchain Maturity Model in Agricultural Supply Chain. Inf. Process. Agric. 2021, 8, 398–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Yi, H. A Traceability Method of Biofuel Production and Utilization Based on Blockchain. Fuel 2022, 310, 122350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Kennedy, H.T. Advanced BioFuels USA–Fighting Fraud with Tech–RSB, Bioledger Build up Blockchain for Biofuels Traceability. Available online: https://advancedbiofuelsusa.info/fighting-fraud-with-tech-rsb-bioledger-build-up-blockchain-for-biofuels-traceability (accessed on 7 June 2025).
  190. Ivanov, D.; Dolgui, A.; Sokolov, B. Cloud Supply Chain: Integrating Industry 4. 0 and Digital Platforms in the “Supply Chain-as-a-Service.” Transp. Res. Part E: Logist. Transp. Rev. 2022, 160, 102676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Moyer, P. Market Data Distribution & Consumption Through Cloud & AI. Available online: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/financial-services/market-data-distribution--consumption-through-cloud--ai (accessed on 29 March 2025).
  192. Imubit. AI Applications for Renewable Fuel Producers. Available online: https://imubit.com/ai-applications-for-renewable-fuel-producers/ (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  193. Mana, A.A.; Allouhi, A.; Hamrani, A.; Rehman, S.; El Jamaoui, I.; Jayachandran, K. Sustainable AI-Based Production Agriculture: Exploring AI Applications and Implications in Agricultural Practices. Smart Agric. Technol. 2024, 7, 100416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Obi Reddy, G.P.; Dwivedi, B.S.; Ravindra Chary, G. Applications of Geospatial and Big Data Technologies in Smart Farming. In Smart Agriculture for Developing Nations: Status, Perspectives and Challenges; Pakeerathan, K., Ed.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 15–31. ISBN 978-981-19-8738-0. [Google Scholar]
  195. Gong, Y.; Zhang, H.; Morris, T.; Zhang, C.; Alharithi, M. Waste Cooking Oil Recycling and the Potential Use of Blockchain Technology in the UK. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. RSB. Blockchain Database for Sustainable Biofuels: A Case Study. 2021. Available online: https://rsb.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Blockchain-Database-for-Sustainable-Biofuels-A-Case-Study-March-2021.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  197. Yan, G.; Yang, X.; Shaban, M.; Abed, A.M.; Abdullaev, S.; Alhomayani, F.M.; Khan, M.N.; Alkhalaf, S.; Alturise, F.; Albalawi, H. Artificial Intelligence-Powered Study of a Waste-to-Energy System through Optimization by Regression-Centered Machine Learning Algorithms. Energy 2025, 320, 135142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Lakhouit, A. Revolutionizing Urban Solid Waste Management with AI and IoT: A Review of Smart Solutions for Waste Collection, Sorting, and Recycling. Results Eng. 2025, 25, 104018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Banerjee, N. Biomass to Energy—An Analysis of Current Technologies, Prospects, and Challenges. Bioenerg. Res. 2023, 16, 683–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Chávez, M.M.M.; Sarache, W.; Costa, Y. Towards a Comprehensive Model of a Biofuel Supply Chain Optimization from Coffee Crop Residues. Transp. Res. Part. E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2018, 116, 136–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Csedő, Z.; Magyari, J.; Zavarkó, M. Biofuel Supply Chain Planning and Circular Business Model Innovation at Wastewater Treatment Plants: The Case of Biomethane Production. Clean. Logist. Supply Chain 2024, 11, 100158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Fang, B.; Yu, J.; Chen, Z.; Osman, A.I.; Farghali, M.; Ihara, I.; Hamza, E.H.; Rooney, D.W.; Yap, P.-S. Artificial Intelligence for Waste Management in Smart Cities: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2023, 21, 1959–1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Koskinopoulou, M.; Raptopoulos, F.; Papadopoulos, G.; Mavrakis, N.; Maniadakis, M. Robotic Waste Sorting Technology: Toward a Vision-Based Categorization System for the Industrial Robotic Separation of Recyclable Waste. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 2021, 28, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Olawade, D.B.; Fapohunda, O.; Wada, O.Z.; Usman, S.O.; Ige, A.O.; Ajisafe, O.; Oladapo, B.I. Smart Waste Management: A Paradigm Shift Enabled by Artificial Intelligence. Waste Manag. Bull. 2024, 2, 244–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Alam, A.; Dwivedi, P. Modeling Site Suitability and Production Potential of Carinata-Based Sustainable Jet Fuel in the Southeastern United States. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 239, 117817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Ebrahimi, S.; Haji Esmaeili, S.A.; Sobhani, A.; Szmerekovsky, J. Renewable Jet Fuel Supply Chain Network Design: Application of Direct Monetary Incentives. Appl. Energy 2022, 310, 118569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Shah, M.; Wever, M.; Espig, M. A Framework for Assessing the Potential of Artificial Intelligence in the Circular Bioeconomy. Sustainability 2025, 17, 3535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. FuelCab India Overcoming Biofuel Supply Chain Challenges: How FuelCab Can Drive Solutions? Available online: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/overcoming-biofuel-supply-chain-challenges-how-fuelcab-can-drive-e0exc/ (accessed on 12 June 2025).
  209. Bastos, T.; Teixeira, L.C.; Nunes, L.J.R. Forest 4.0: Technologies and Digitalization to Create the Residual Biomass Supply Chain of the Future. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 467, 143041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Flak, J. Technologies for Sustainable Biomass Supply—Overview of Market Offering. Agronomy 2020, 10, 798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Zahraee, S.M.; Shiwakoti, N.; Stasinopoulos, P. Agricultural Biomass Supply Chain Resilience: COVID-19 Outbreak vs. Sustainability Compliance, Technological Change, Uncertainties, and Policies. Clean. Logist. Supply Chain 2022, 4, 100049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Andiappan, V.; How, B.S.; Ngan, S.L. A Perspective on Post-Pandemic Biomass Supply Chains: Opportunities and Challenges for the New Norm. Process Integr. Optim. Sustain. 2021, 5, 1003–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Palander, T.; Tokola, T.; Borz, S.A.; Rauch, P. Forest Supply Chains During Digitalization: Current Implementations and Prospects in Near Future. Curr. For. Rep. 2024, 10, 223–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. National Agricultural Library Digital Twins for the Optimization of Agrifood Value Chain Processes and the Supply of Quality Biomass for Bio-Processing|National Agricultural Library. Available online: https://www.nal.usda.gov/research-tools/food-safety-research-projects/digital-twins-optimization-agrifood-value-chain (accessed on 8 March 2025).
  215. Karkaria, V.; Tsai, Y.-K.; Chen, Y.-P.; Chen, W. An Optimization-Centric Review on Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Digital Twin Technologies in Manufacturing. Eng. Optim. 2025, 57, 161–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Ikbarieh, A.; Jin, W.; Zhao, Y.; Saha, N.; Klinger, J.L.; Xia, Y.; Dai, S. Machine Learning Assisted Cross-Scale Hopper Design for Flowing Biomass Granular Materials. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2025, 13, 5838–5851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Khan, M.R.; Amin, J.M.; Hosen, M.M. Digital Twin-Driven Optimization of Bioenergy Production from Waste Materials. SSRN 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Shi, Z.; Ferrari, G.; Ai, P.; Marinello, F.; Pezzuolo, A. Artificial Intelligence for Biomass Detection, Production and Energy Usage in Rural Areas: A Review of Technologies and Applications. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2023, 60, 103548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Wu, L.; Xiao, G.; Huang, D.; Zhang, X.; Ye, D.; Weng, H. Edge Computing-Based Machine Vision for Non-Invasive and Rapid Soft Sensing of Mushroom Liquid Strain Biomass. Agronomy 2025, 15, 242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Bioenergy Insight US Energy Secretary Heralds $15m Biomass Facility Upgrade. Available online: https://www.bioenergy-news.com/news/us-energy-secretary-heralds-15m-biomass-facility-upgrade/ (accessed on 13 June 2025).
  221. Guo, G.; He, Y.; Jin, F.; Mašek, O.; Huang, Q. Application of Life Cycle Assessment and Machine Learning for the Production and Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Hydrothermal Bio-Oil. Bioresour. Technol. 2023, 379, 129027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Romeiko, X.X.; Zhang, X.; Pang, Y.; Gao, F.; Xu, M.; Lin, S.; Babbitt, C. A Review of Machine Learning Applications in Life Cycle Assessment Studies. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 168969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Ghoroghi, A.; Rezgui, Y.; Petri, I.; Beach, T. Advances in Application of Machine Learning to Life Cycle Assessment: A Literature Review. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2022, 27, 433–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Yadav, V.S.; Singh, A.R.; Raut, R.D.; Mangla, S.K.; Luthra, S.; Kumar, A. Exploring the Application of Industry 4.0 Technologies in the Agricultural Food Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2022, 169, 108304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Insights, L. New Blockchain Registry for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Backed by McKinsey, JP Morgan, Meta. 2022. Ledger Insights-blockchain for Enterprise. Available online: https://www.ledgerinsights.com/blockchain-registry-for-sustainable-aviation-fuel-backed-by-mckinsey-jp-morgan-meta/ (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  226. Fay, C.D.; Corcoran, B.; Diamond, D. Green IoT Event Detection for Carbon-Emission Monitoring in Sensor Networks. Sensors 2024, 24, 162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Lim, H.R.; Khoo, K.S.; Chew, K.W.; Teo, M.Y.M.; Ling, T.C.; Alharthi, S.; Alsanie, W.F.; Show, P.L. Evaluation of Real-Time Monitoring on the Growth of Spirulina Microalgae: Internet of Things and Microalgae Technologies. IEEE Internet Things J. 2024, 11, 3274–3281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Dryad Ultra Early Wildfire Detection|Dryad Networks. Available online: https://www.dryad.net (accessed on 15 June 2025).
  229. Borrill, E.; Koh, S.C.L.; Yuan, R. Review of Technological Developments and LCA Applications on Biobased SAF Conversion Processes. Front. Fuels 2024, 2, 1397962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. da Costa, M.A.V.F.; Normey-Rico, J.E. Modeling, Control and Optimization of Ethanol Fermentation Process. IFAC Proc. Vol. 2011, 44, 10609–10614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Naveed, M.H.; Khan, M.N.A.; Mukarram, M.; Naqvi, S.R.; Abdullah, A.; Haq, Z.U.; Ullah, H.; Mohamadi, H.A. Cellulosic Biomass Fermentation for Biofuel Production: Review of Artificial Intelligence Approaches. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 189, 113906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Petre, E.; Selişteanu, D.; Roman, M. Advanced Nonlinear Control Strategies for a Fermentation Bioreactor Used for Ethanol Production. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 328, 124836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Owusu, W.A.; Marfo, S.A. Artificial Intelligence Application in Bioethanol Production. Int. J. Energy Res. 2023, 2023, 7844835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Adeleke, I.; Nwulu, N.; Adebo, O.A. Internet of Things (IoT) in the Food Fermentation Process: A Bibliometric Review. J. Food Process Eng. 2023, 46, e14321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Islam, M.R.; Oliullah, K.; Kabir, M.M.; Alom, M.; Mridha, M.F. Machine Learning Enabled IoT System for Soil Nutrients Monitoring and Crop Recommendation. J. Agric. Food Res. 2023, 14, 100880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Baicu, L.M.; Andrei, M.; Ifrim, G.A.; Dimitrievici, L.T. Embedded IoT Design for Bioreactor Sensor Integration. Sensors 2024, 24, 6587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. O’Grady, M.J.; Langton, D.; O’Hare, G.M.P. Edge Computing: A Tractable Model for Smart Agriculture? Artif. Intell. Agric. 2019, 3, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Luman, R. Blockchain Driven Supply Chain Transparency in Saf Production: Enhancing Traceability and Regulatory Compliance. Int. J. Adv. Res. Comput. Sci. 2024, 15, 89–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Borowski, P.F. Digitization, Digital Twins, Blockchain, and Industry 4.0 as Elements of Management Process in Enterprises in the Energy Sector. Energies 2021, 14, 1885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Ghenai, C.; Husein, L.A.; Al Nahlawi, M.; Hamid, A.K.; Bettayeb, M. Recent Trends of Digital Twin Technologies in the Energy Sector: A Comprehensive Review. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 54, 102837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Yu, W.; Patros, P.; Young, B.; Klinac, E.; Walmsley, T.G. Energy Digital Twin Technology for Industrial Energy Management: Classification, Challenges and Future. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 161, 112407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. H2-View ORLEN and Yokogawa Sign MoU to Develop SAF Production Technology. Available online: https://www.h2-view.com/story/orlen-and-yokogawa-sign-mou-to-develop-saf-production-technology/2099400.article/ (accessed on 16 June 2025).
  243. Metzger, D.F.; Klahn, C.; Dittmeyer, R. Downsizing Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production with Additive Manufacturing—An Experimental Study on a 3D Printed Reactor for Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis. Energies 2023, 16, 6798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. RMI. RMI Partners with Energy Web Foundation to Build Sustainable Aviation Fuel Certificate Registry, as Part of Ongoing Decarbonization Work with the Sustainable Aviation Buyers Alliance. Available online: https://rmi.org/press-release/rmi-partners-with-energy-web-foundation-to-build-sustainable-aviation-fuel-certificate-registry/ (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  245. COSCO. COSCO SHIPPING Lines Introduces Traceable and Verifiable Green Certificates with GSBN Empowered by Blockchain Technology. Available online: https://en.coscoshipping.com/col/col6923/art/2024/art_3b7a182117d8421194ba7e9d2c24a98e.html (accessed on 16 June 2025).
  246. Meena, M.; Shubham, S.; Paritosh, K.; Pareek, N.; Vivekanand, V. Production of Biofuels from Biomass: Predicting the Energy Employing Artificial Intelligence Modelling. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 340, 125642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Tanzil, A.H.; Brandt, K.; Zhang, X.; Wolcott, M.; Stockle, C.; Garcia-Perez, M. Production of Sustainable Aviation Fuels in Petroleum Refineries: Evaluation of New Bio-Refinery Concepts. Front. Energy Res. 2021, 9, 735661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Comesana, A.E.; Huntington, T.T.; Scown, C.D.; Niemeyer, K.E.; Rapp, V.H. A Systematic Method for Selecting Molecular Descriptors as Features When Training Models for Predicting Physiochemical Properties. Fuel 2022, 321, 123836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Arias, A.; Feijoo, G.; Moreira, M.T. How Could Artificial Intelligence Be Used to Increase the Potential of Biorefineries in the near Future? A Review. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2023, 32, 103277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. IEA Biofuel Production Using Petroleum Refining Technologies–Analysis. Available online: https://www.iea.org/articles/biofuel-production-using-petroleum-refining-technologies (accessed on 16 June 2025).
  251. Sans, V. Emerging Trends in Flow Chemistry Enabled by 3D Printing: Robust Reactors, Biocatalysis and Electrochemistry. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2020, 25, 100367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Schmieg, B.; Döbber, J.; Kirschhöfer, F.; Pohl, M.; Franzreb, M. Advantages of Hydrogel-Based 3D-Printed Enzyme Reactors and Their Limitations for Biocatalysis. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Zonta, T.; da Costa, C.A.; da Rosa Righi, R.; de Lima, M.J.; da Trindade, E.S.; Li, G.P. Predictive Maintenance in the Industry 4.0: A Systematic Literature Review. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 150, 106889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Velthuis, N.K. The Shell Journey towards Global Predictive Maintenance. Shell TechXplorer Digest, 2021. Available online: https://www.shell.com/what-we-do/technology-and-innovation/shell-techxplorer-digest/shell-techxplorer-digest-2020/_jcr_content/root/main/section/list_copy_copy_copy/list_item_copy_98181_819446707/links/item0.stream/1669888451651/dabc9c17a2c9a00d39cb4f442e75d667920c8562/the-shell-journey-towards-global-predictive-maintenance-velthuis.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  255. Akhator, P.; Oboirien, B. Digitilising the Energy Sector: A Comprehensive Digital Twin Framework for Biomass Gasification Power Plant with CO2 Capture. Clean. Energy Syst. 2025, 10, 100175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Sierla, S.; Sorsamäki, L.; Azangoo, M.; Villberg, A.; Hytönen, E.; Vyatkin, V. Towards Semi-Automatic Generation of a Steady State Digital Twin of a Brownfield Process Plant. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Shell Creating Integrated Digital Ecosystems|Shell Global. Available online: https://www.shell.com/what-we-do/digitalisation/digitalisation-in-action/creating-integrated-digital-ecosystems.html (accessed on 16 June 2025).
  258. Park, J.; Kang, D. Artificial Intelligence and Smart Technologies in Safety Management: A Comprehensive Analysis Across Multiple Industries. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. McKinsey Securing a Sustainable Fuel Supply: Airline Strategies|McKinsey. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/aerospace-and-defense/our-insights/how-the-aviation-industry-could-help-scale-sustainable-fuel-production? (accessed on 19 May 2025).
  260. Emerson and Neste Engineering Solutions to Optimize Fintoil Biorefinery Operations for More Efficient, Sustainable Production|Emerson US. Available online: https://www.emerson.com/en-us/news/automation/22-6-digital-technologies-optimize-biorefinery-operations (accessed on 16 June 2025).
  261. Jessen, J. Shell’s Blockchain Solution to Scaling SAF. Available online: https://climatetechdigital.com/tech-and-ai/shells-blockchain-solution-to-scaling-saf (accessed on 18 June 2025).
  262. Wang, B.; Ting, Z.J.; Zhao, M. Sustainable Aviation Fuels: Key Opportunities and Challenges in Lowering Carbon Emissions for Aviation Industry. Carbon Capture Sci. Technol. 2024, 13, 100263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Jessen, J. SAF: Helping Microsoft & DB Schenker Cut Supply Chain Carbon. Available online: https://sustainabilitymag.com/articles/db-schenker-microsoft-sustainable-logistics (accessed on 19 June 2025).
  264. Norazmi, A. SAF Accounting Based on Robust Chain-of-Custody Approaches. 2023. Available online: https://www.iata.org/contentassets/d13875e9ed784f75bac90f000760e998/saf-accounting-policy-paper_20230905_final.pdf (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  265. Okolie, J.A. Introduction of Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence in Biofuel Technology. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2024, 47, 100928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  266. Ukoba, K.; Olatunji, K.O.; Adeoye, E.; Jen, T.-C.; Madyira, D.M. Optimizing Renewable Energy Systems through Artificial Intelligence: Review and Future Prospects. Energy Environ. 2024, 35, 3833–3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Duc, D.N.; Nananukul, N. An Integrated Methodology Based on Machine-Learning Algorithms for Biomass Supply Chain Optimisation. Int. J. Logist. Syst. Manag. 2023, 46, 47–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Ma, S.; Ding, W.; Liu, Y.; Ren, S.; Yang, H. Digital Twin and Big Data-Driven Sustainable Smart Manufacturing Based on Information Management Systems for Energy-Intensive Industries. Appl. Energy 2022, 326, 119986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Osman, E. Edge Computing for the Aviation Sector; Zsah: London, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  270. DOE Data, Modeling, and Analysis Program. Available online: https://www.energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/data-modeling-and-analysis-program (accessed on 21 June 2025).
  271. Wang, H.; Chaffart, D.; Ricardez-Sandoval, L.A. Modelling and Optimization of a Pilot-Scale Entrained-Flow Gasifier Using Artificial Neural Networks. Energy 2019, 188, 116076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Haseltalab, V.; Dutta, A.; Yang, S. On the 3D Printed Catalyst for Biomass-Bio-Oil Conversion: Key Technologies and Challenges. J. Catal. 2023, 417, 286–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Borges, M.E.; Hernández, L.; Ruiz-Morales, J.C.; Martín-Zarza, P.F.; Fierro, J.L.G.; Esparza, P. Use of 3D Printing for Biofuel Production: Efficient Catalyst for Sustainable Biodiesel Production from Wastes. Clean Techn Environ. Policy 2017, 19, 2113–2127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Sharma, V.; Tsai, M.-L.; Chen, C.-W.; Sun, P.-P.; Nargotra, P.; Dong, C.-D. Advances in Machine Learning Technology for Sustainable Biofuel Production Systems in Lignocellulosic Biorefineries. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 886, 163972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  275. Honeywell Honeywell And USA Bioenergy To Partner On Automation At New Sustainable Aviation Fuel Refinery. Available online: https://www.honeywell.com/us/en/press/2024/09/honeywell-and-usa-bioenergy-to-partner-on-automation (accessed on 20 June 2025).
  276. Asghar, A.; Sairash, S.; Hussain, N.; Baqar, Z.; Sumrin, A.; Bilal, M. Current Challenges of Biomass Refinery and Prospects of Emerging Technologies for Sustainable Bioproducts and Bioeconomy. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefining 2022, 16, 1478–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Emerson Fuel Blending|Emerson, US. Available online: https://www.emerson.com/en-us/industries/automation/downstream-hydrocarbons/refining/fuel-blending (accessed on 20 June 2025).
  278. Ucar, A.; Karakose, M.; Kırımça, N. Artificial Intelligence for Predictive Maintenance Applications: Key Components, Trustworthiness, and Future Trends. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Arinze, C.A.; Izionworu; Onuegbu, V.; Isong, D.; Daudu, C.D.; Adefemi, A. Predictive Maintenance in Oil and Gas Facilities, Leveraging Ai for Asset Integrity Management. Int. J. Front. Eng. Technol. Res. 2024, 6, 016–026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Patro, P.K.; Jayaraman, R.; Acquaye, A.; Salah, K.; Musamih, A. Blockchain-Based Solution to Enhance Carbon Footprint Traceability, Accounting, and Offsetting in the Passenger Aviation Industry. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2024, 1–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Sipthorpe, A.; Brink, S.; Van Leeuwen, T.; Staffell, I. Blockchain Solutions for Carbon Markets Are Nearing Maturity. One Earth 2022, 5, 779–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Popowicz, M.; Katzer, N.J.; Kettele, M.; Schöggl, J.-P.; Baumgartner, R.J. Digital Technologies for Life Cycle Assessment: A Review and Integrated Combination Framework. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess 2025, 30, 405–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Ma, C.; Zhou, Y.; Yan, W.; He, W.; Liu, Q.; Li, Z.; Wang, H.; Li, G.; Yang, Y.; Han, W.; et al. Predominant Catalytic Performance of Nickel Nanoparticles Embedded into Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Quantum Dot-Based Nanosheets for the Nitroreduction of Halogenated Nitrobenzene. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 8162–8171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Biran, O.; Feder, O.; Moatti, Y.; Kiourtis, A.; Kyriazis, D.; Manias, G.; Mavrogiorgou, A.; Sgouros, N.M.; Barata, M.T.; Oldani, I.; et al. PolicyCLOUD: A Prototype of a Cloud Serverless Ecosystem for Policy Analytics. Data Policy 2022, 4, e44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. NREL Engage Energy Modeling Tool|State, Local, and Tribal Governments|NREL. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/state-local-tribal/engage-energy-modeling-tool (accessed on 21 June 2025).
  286. Huynh, T.A.; Zondervan, E. Process Intensification and Digital Twin–the Potential for the Energy Transition in Process Industries. In Process Systems Engineering: For a Smooth Energy Transition; Zondervan, E., Ed.; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 2022; pp. 131–150. ISBN 978-3-11-070520-1. [Google Scholar]
  287. Sheik, A.G.; Kumar, A.; Ansari, F.A.; Raj, V.; Peleato, N.M.; Patan, A.K.; Kumari, S.; Bux, F. Reinvigorating Algal Cultivation for Biomass Production with Digital Twin Technology-a Smart Sustainable Infrastructure. Algal Res. 2024, 84, 103779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Muldbak, M.; Gargalo, C.; Krühne, U.; Udugama, I.; Gernaey, K.V. Digital Twin of a Pilot-Scale Bio-Production Setup: 14th International Symposium on Process Systems Engineering (PSE 2021+). Proc. Int. Symp. Process Syst. Eng. 2022, 49, 1417–1422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Ficili, I.; Giacobbe, M.; Tricomi, G.; Puliafito, A. From Sensors to Data Intelligence: Leveraging IoT, Cloud, and Edge Computing with AI. Sensors 2025, 25, 1763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Raman, R.; Gunasekar, S.; Dávid, L.D.; Rahmat, A.F.; Nedungadi, P. Aligning Sustainable Aviation Fuel Research with Sustainable Development Goals: Trends and Thematic Analysis. Energy Rep. 2024, 12, 2642–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Qudrat-Ullah, H. A Thematic Review of AI and ML in Sustainable Energy Policies for Developing Nations. Energies 2025, 18, 2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Yar, M.A.; Hamdan, M.; Anshari, M.; Fitriyani, N.L.; Syafrudin, M. Governing with Intelligence: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Policy Development. Information 2024, 15, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Woo, J.; Fatima, R.; Kibert, C.J.; Newman, R.E.; Tian, Y.; Srinivasan, R.S. Applying Blockchain Technology for Building Energy Performance Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) and the Carbon Credit Market: A Review of the Literature. Build. Environ. 2021, 205, 108199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Fu, S.; Tan, Y.; Xu, Z. Blockchain-Based Renewable Energy Certificate Trade for Low-Carbon Community of Active Energy Agents. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Merlo, A.L.C.; Mendonça, D.S.; Santos, J.; Carvalho, S.T.; Guerra, R.; Brandão, D. Blockchain for the Carbon Market: A Literature Review. Discov. Environ. 2025, 3, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Swinkels, L. Trading Carbon Credit Tokens on the Blockchain. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2024, 91, 720–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Lennard, Z. FEDECOM: Enabling Cross-Border Energy Exchange by Federating Energy Communities. Open Res. Eur. 2025, 4, 269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Ai, W.; Cho, H.M. Predictive Models for Biodiesel Performance and Emission Characteristics in Diesel Engines: A Review. Energies 2024, 17, 4805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Baumann, S.; Klingauf, U. Modeling of Aircraft Fuel Consumption Using Machine Learning Algorithms. CEAS Aeronaut. J. 2020, 11, 277–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Sadeq, A.M.; Homod, R.Z.; Hasan, H.A.; Alhasnawi, B.N.; Hussein, A.K.; Jahangiri, A.; Togun, H.; Dehghani-Soufi, M.; Abbas, S. Advancements in combustion technologies: A review of innovations, methodologies, and practical applications. Energy Convers. Manag. X 2025, 26, 100964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Airbus Digital Twins: Accelerating Aerospace Innovation from Design to Operations|Airbus. Available online: https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/stories/2025-04-digital-twins-accelerating-aerospace-innovation-from-design-to-operations (accessed on 21 June 2025).
  302. Risse, H. Lab of the Future: Automated Robotic Analysis of Petroleum Products. 2024. Available online: https://www.metrohm.com/en/discover/blog/2024/robotic-analysis-petro.html (accessed on 10 August 2025).
  303. Jameel, A.; Gani, A. A Case Study on Integrating an AI System into the Fuel Blending Process in a Chemical Refinery. ChemEngineering 2025, 9, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Liu, Z.; Yang, X. Insight of Low Flammability Limit on Sustainable Aviation Fuel Blend and Prediction by ANN Model. Energy AI 2024, 18, 100423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  305. Yang, Z.; Boehm, R.C.; Bell, D.C.; Heyne, J.S. Maximizing Sustainable Aviation Fuel Usage through Optimization of Distillation Cut Points and Blending. Fuel 2023, 353, 129136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. NREL On the Ground in Colorado, NREL Is Simulating Sustainable Aviation Fuel Combustion During Flight. Available online: https://www.nrel.gov/news/features/2024/on-the-ground-in-colorado-nrel-is-simulating-sustainable-aviation-fuel-combustion-during-flight.html (accessed on 9 March 2025).
  307. Airbus This Chase Aircraft Is Tracking 100% SAF’s Emissions Performance|Airbus. Available online: https://www.airbus.com/en/newsroom/stories/2021-11-this-chase-aircraft-is-tracking-100-safs-emissions-performance (accessed on 21 June 2025).
  308. Kuzhagaliyeva, N.; Horváth, S.; Williams, J.; Nicolle, A.; Sarathy, S.M. Artificial Intelligence-Driven Design of Fuel Mixtures. Commun. Chem. 2022, 5, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  309. Ali Ijaz Malik, M.; Kalam, M.A.; Mujtaba Abbas, M.; Susan Silitonga, A.; Ikram, A. Recent Advancements, Applications, and Technical Challenges in Fuel Additives-Assisted Engine Operations. Energy Convers. Manag. 2024, 313, 118643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. GE’s Catalyst Can Help Hybrid Planes Take Flight By Generating Up To 1 Megawatt|GE Aerospace News. Available online: https://www.geaerospace.com/news/articles/product-technology/ges-catalyst-can-help-hybrid-planes-take-flight-generating-1-megawatt (accessed on 21 June 2025).
  311. Miller, J.H.; Tifft, S.M.; Wiatrowski, M.R.; Benavides, P.T.; Huq, N.A.; Christensen, E.D.; Alleman, T.; Hays, C.; Luecke, J.; Kneucker, C.M.; et al. Screening and Evaluation of Biomass Upgrading Strategies for Sustainable Transportation Fuel Production with Biomass-Derived Volatile Fatty Acids. iScience 2022, 25, 105384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  312. Pidatala, V.R.; Lei, M.; Choudhary, H.; Petzold, C.J.; Martin, H.G.; Simmons, B.A.; Gladden, J.M.; Rodriguez, A. A Miniaturized Feedstocks-to-Fuels Pipeline for Screening the Efficiency of Deconstruction and Microbial Conversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0305336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  313. Abu Talib, M.; Nasir, Q.; Dakalbab, F.; Saud, H. Future Aviation Jobs: The Role of Technology in Shaping Skills and Competencies. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2025, 11, 100517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Hu, J.-L.; Li, Y.; Chew, J.-C. Industry 5.0 and Human-Centered Energy System: A Comprehensive Review with Socio-Economic Viewpoints. Energies 2025, 18, 2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Ahmed, W. Artificial Intelligence in Aviation: A Review of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Applications for Enhanced Safety and Security. Prem. J. Artif. Intell. 2025, 3, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Parhamfar, M. Towards Green Airports: Factors Influencing Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sustainability through Renewable Energy. Next Res. 2024, 1, 100060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  317. Thepchalerm, T.; Pinsuwan, S. CEO Voices on Sustainable Aviation: An Analysis of Environmental Communication in the Airline Industry. Green Technol. Sustain. 2025, 3, 100194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Thanasi-Boçe, M.; Hoxha, J. Blockchain for Sustainable Development: A Systematic Review. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. LanzaJet. Announces Investment from Microsoft’s Climate Innovation. Available online: https://www.lanzajet.com/news-insights/lanzajet-announces-investment-from-microsofts-climate-innovation-fund-supporting-continued-company-growth (accessed on 22 June 2025).
  320. Chen, C.-H.; Chen, G.; He, J.; Kannan, D. Big Data for Logistics Decarbonization. Ann. Oper. Res. 2024, 343, 923–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Chen, Z.; vom Lehn, F.; Pitsch, H.; Cai, L. Design of Novel High-Performance Fuels with Artificial Intelligence: Case Study for Spark-Ignition Engine Applications. Appl. Energy Combust. Sci. 2025, 23, 100341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Okolie, J.A.; Moradi, K.; Rogachuk, B.E.; Narra, B.N.; Ogbaga, C.C.; Okoye, P.U.; Adeleke, A.A. Data-Driven Framework for the Techno-Economic Assessment of Sustainable Aviation Fuel from Pyrolysis. Bioenerg. Res. 2024, 18, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Enderle, B.; Rauch, B.; Hall, C.; Bauder, U. A Proposed Digital Twin Concept for the Smart Utilization of Sustainable Aviation Fuels. In AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum; AIAA SciTech Forum; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics: Reston, VA, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  324. MarketsandMarkets Overcoming AI Challenges in Aviation Fuel Market. Available online: https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/ResearchInsight/ai-impact-analysis-on-aviation-fuel-industry.asp (accessed on 23 June 2025).
  325. Hapsari, A.W.; Prastowo, H.; Pitana, T. Real-Time Fuel Consumption Monitoring System Integrated With Internet Of Things (IOT). Kapal: J. Ilmu Pengetah. Dan. Teknol. Kelaut. 2021, 18, 88–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Velarde, C. Sustainable Aviation Fuel ‘Monitoring System’; European Union Aviation Safety Agency: Cologne, Germany, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  327. Bocca, R.; Espinoza, N.; Jamison, S. Unleashing the Full Potential of Industrial Clusters: Infrastructure Solutions for Clean Energies. Available online: https://initiatives.weforum.org/transitioning-industrial-clusters/case-study-details/avelia,-the-blockchain-powered-book-and-claim-solution-for-scaling-saf-demand/aJYTG0000000UkT4AU (accessed on 23 June 2025).
  328. Brett, D. New Blockchain Platform Launched for SAF Usage Tracking in Cargo. Available online: https://www.aircargonews.net/new-blockchain-platform-launched-for-saf-usage-tracking-in-cargo/1079016.article (accessed on 23 June 2025).
  329. Boeing. Launches SAF Dashboard to Track and Project Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production. Available online: https://investors.boeing.com/investors/news/press-release-details/2023/Boeing-Launches-SAF-Dashboard-to-Track-and-Project-Sustainable-Aviation-Fuel-Production/default.aspx (accessed on 23 June 2025).
  330. Wheelock, C. The Business Case for AI-Powered Sustainability; Canopy Edge: Lakewood, CO, USA, 2025. [Google Scholar]
  331. Rogachuk, B.E.; Prigmore, S.M.; Ogbaga, C.C.; Okolie, J.A. Public Perception and Awareness of Sustainable Aviation Fuel in South Central United States. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Alahmari, N.; Mehmood, R.; Alzahrani, A.; Yigitcanlar, T.; Corchado, J.M. Autonomous and Sustainable Service Economies: Data-Driven Optimization of Design and Operations through Discovery of Multi-Perspective Parameters. Sustainability 2023, 15, 16003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Analysis of future domestic and international aviation carbon dioxide emissions [4].
Figure 1. Analysis of future domestic and international aviation carbon dioxide emissions [4].
Sustainability 17 07325 g001
Figure 2. Disruptive technologies under Industry 4.0.
Figure 2. Disruptive technologies under Industry 4.0.
Sustainability 17 07325 g002
Table 1. Global SAF initiatives: A chronological overview.
Table 1. Global SAF initiatives: A chronological overview.
YearInitiative/ProgramCountry/OrgObjectiveReference
2021SAF Grand Challenge RoadmapUS (DOE, DOT, USDA, EPA)
  • 3B gallons by 2030, 35B gallons by 2050
  • Integrated multi-agency strategy focused on feedstock, technology, and supply chain development
[28]
2021Canada Clean Fuel RegulationsCanada
  • Establishes SAF as a credit-generating option in fuel compliance markets
  • Targets a 15% reduction by 2030
[29]
2021Japan SAF RoadmapJapan
  • Establishes SAF as part of national decarbonization strategy (No details have been released on design aspects)
  • Targets 10% SAF by 2030 for international flights
[30]
2021SAF Consortium RoadmapNew Zealand
  • Plans establishing a domestic SAF industry in New Zealand capable of reducing aviation emissions by up to 85% by 2050
  • Strong support for public–private collaboration
[31]
2022National Sustainable Aviation Fuel
Roadmap
United Arab Emirates
  • Aim to produce 700 million liters of SAF annually by 2030
  • Aims to implement a voluntary target for locally produced SAF to represent at least 1% of the total fuel used by national airlines at UAE airports by 2031
[32]
2023Sustainable Aviation Fuel RoadmapAustralia
  • Focuses on production, supply chain development, and integration into the national aviation sector
  • Supported by Queensland Govt., Qantas, Airbus, and LanzaJet
[33]
2024Singapore Sustainable Air Hub BlueprintSingapore
  • Achieve a 20% reduction in domestic aviation emissions by 2030, with a firm commitment to reach net zero emissions by 205
  • From 2026, flights departing Singapore will be mandated to use SAF
[34]
Table 2. Key technologies in blockchains and their applications in supply chain management.
Table 2. Key technologies in blockchains and their applications in supply chain management.
TechnologyDefinitionApplications
Distributed ledger technology (DLT)
  • A shared, immutable ledger that operates without a central authority, minimizing the need for intermediaries [57].
  • Enables the collection, storage, and sharing of critical information [58].
  • Strengthens input authenticity, supports ethical sourcing, and minimizes fraud [59,60].
  • Enables a data-driven evaluation of performance through improved transparency [61].
  • Strengthens cybersecurity; fosters reliable and efficient supply chain management [62].
  • Enables real-time tracking and tracing of goods to ensure efficient logistics and smooth supply chain flow [63].
Smart contract
  • A computer-driven, automated contracting system designed to streamline digital collaboration among multiple parties [64].
  • Ethereum is a type of blockchain that allows users to design their contracts with customized data structures and functions through unique digital addresses and application programming interfaces (APIs) [65].
  • Facilitates automation, synchronization, and transparency [66].
  • Supports the enforcement of legal agreements and reduces the need for intermediaries in transferring asset ownership [66,67].
  • Collaborates on a shared digital platform leading to significant reductions in operational costs [68].
  • Tracks changes in asset status throughout the logistics process [69,70].
Tokenization
  • A digital representation of physical or intangible assets in the form of cryptographic tokens that can be exchanged or traded [71].
  • Enables cross-border payments and facilitates seamless information exchange [72].
  • Enhances the visibility and traceability of transaction flow [73].
  • Collects financial information (e.g., ratio of on-time deliveries) and non-financial information (e.g., cargo and vehicle details) to aid financial institutions make informed decisions [74,75,76].
  • Enhances financial credibility, resulting in lower interest rates or expedited loan approvals [77,78].
  • Raises capital and secures financing for their operations [79].
Table 3. Key technologies in AI and their applications in supply chain management.
Table 3. Key technologies in AI and their applications in supply chain management.
Technology Definition Application
ML
  • Relies on algorithms to enable systems to learn representations of large, complex datasets [82].
  • Extracts valuable information to support practical supplier evaluation and selection [83].
  • Uncovers hidden patterns in inventory [84].
  • Enhances transportation and distribution efficiency through delivery route optimization [85].
  • Analyzes historical sales data for seasonal forecasting and strategic planning [86].
NLP
  • Leverages statistical and semantic analysis to break down the relationships between words and phrases, enabling the automated extraction of meaning from speech or text [87].
  • Automates the extraction of key information like supplier names, quantities, and contract terms from invoices, bills, and other documents [88].
  • Facilitates real-time translation and enables chatbot-assisted correspondence in global supply chains [89,90].
  • Utilizes sentiment analysis to evaluate feedback from customers and suppliers [91].
  • Interprets complex legal language in supply chain contracts [92].
  • Supports planning by analyzing news and operational data to detect compliance issues and risks [93].
Computer vision
  • Enables the interpretation and extraction of meaningful information from visual inputs like images and videos [94].
  • Enables sophisticated image recognition algorithms to monitor inventory levels and warehouse management [95].
  • Automates stock counting, inventory tracking, and replenishment forecasting [96].
  • Enhances surveillance and security systems [97].
  • Supports quality control with autonomous defect detection during production and packaging [98,99].
  • Enhances traffic signs recognition, license plate reading, vehicle tracking, and cargo loading [100].
Robotic Process Automation (RPA)
  • Uses programming interfaces and software robots to automate the repetition of routine tasks [101].
  • Automates repetitive tasks like order processing, data entry, predictive maintenance, logistics coordination, inventory updates, shipment scheduling and tracking, invoice processing, report generation, and communications [102].
  • Utilizes warehouse management through technologies such as Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems (AS/RS), Automated Guided Vehicles (AGVs), Collaborative Robots (Cobots), and Goods-to-Person (G2P) systems [103,104].
  • Identifies, classifies, and manages items, including tasks like truck loading/unloading, item sorting, and shelf replenishment [105,106].
  • Integrates with SAP, Excel, and web portals to provide visualization for RPA analytics [103].
  • Coordinates with AI techniques like fuzzy logic and artificial neural networks to extract information from documents, streamlining procurement and simplifying RPA workflows [102].
Generative AI (GAI)
  • Refers to systems that can create new content, such as text, images, videos, software code, or simulations, by learning patterns from existing data [107].
  • Generates Python 3 code from verbal descriptions to simulate queuing systems and inventory processes [108].
  • Negotiates with suppliers by analyzing inputs and adapting customized negotiation strategies for mutual benefits [109].
  • Utilizes ML techniques to track users’ website behavior and purchase history to offer personalized shopping recommendations [110].
  • Provides comprehensive analysis including disruptions, managerial directives, cost-efficiency measurements, service quality, route optimization, and weather [111].
  • Supports sustainable and ethical business practices by minimizing carbon emissions through resource and warehouse optimization [112,113].
  • Monitors regulation, media, social and environmental impacts to prioritize fair trade and ethics [114,115].
  • Recommends actions like audits, alternative suppliers, or communication to address potential violations of fair-trade principles, environmental regulations, or labor laws [116,117].
Table 4. Four layers in IoT and their applications in supply chain management.
Table 4. Four layers in IoT and their applications in supply chain management.
IoT Layers and Their FeaturesApplications
  • Sensing Layer includes RFID tags, sensors, actuators, and other intelligent devices [123].
    A foundational layer.
    Enables identification, tracking, and collection of data from physical objects [124].
  • Uses temperature sensors, multi-agent systems, and smart devices to facilitate collaborative operations while maintaining high standards of safety and security in warehousing [125].
  • Utilizes Ethereum-generated QR codes [126] to store and secure tamper-proof manufacturing, tracking, and shipping information through unique blockchain address [127].
  • Uses a wide array of sensors, including accelerometers [128], battery sensors [126], cameras [129], color sensors, gas sensors [130], GPS modules (NEO-M8N, u-blox AG, Thalwil, Switzerland), gyroscopes, light sensors, humidity sensors [131], moisture sensors, pH sensors, and temperature sensors to support the effective management of transportation, logistics, inventory, and manufacturing activities [132].
  • The collected data is transmitted and aggregated by a third-party computer, which can operate either as a remote server (cloud computing) or a local proximity device (edge computing). Cloud computing enables data storage and processing on centralized remote servers, which are well suited for large-scale, complex analyses but may introduce latency. In contrast, edge computing processes data closer to the source—such as within local gateways or on-site devices—allowing for faster response times and reduced bandwidth requirements. After initial aggregation, the results can be transmitted remotely for further in-depth analysis if needed [133].
  • Network Layer transmits information gathered at sensing layer via wired or wireless networks [134,135].
    Utilizes wireless networks and sensor-enabled RFID technology to provide real-time visibility.
  • Service Layer uses middleware to interact between data services and applications [123,136].
    Integrates cloud computing and edge computing into the IoT ecosystem, enabling sensing devices to interface with IoT applications [133,137].
  • Interface Layer facilitates user interaction with the IoT system [138,139].
    Presents data in an accessible format and functions as an interactive gateway between end-users and IoT-enabled devices [140].
Table 5. Key features in 3D printing and their applications in supply chain management.
Table 5. Key features in 3D printing and their applications in supply chain management.
Key FeaturesApplications
Mass customization
  • Disrupts downstream production and distribution operations [144].
  • Allows customer co-creation of personalized products, merging product design, production, and distribution processes [145,146].
Material efficiency
  • Utilizes diverse raw materials to benefit upstream partners [147].
  • Encourages smarter component design, recycled materials, and lower environmental impact [148].
  • Supports sustainable and eco-friendly supply chain by lowering global carbon emissions and promoting responsible resource utilization [143].
Manufacturing decentralization
  • Facilitates a made-to-order production model, reducing inventory levels [149].
  • Supports decentralization manufacturing near consumption [150], cutting lead times and reliance on centralized production [146].
Inventory and logistics costs reduction
  • Enables on-site production, reduces the need for extensive physical transportation [151].
  • Allows end users to produce items locally [152].
  • Transforms inventory management towards a leaner system with more raw materials and semi-finished components over large volumes of finished stock [153,154].
Table 6. Key features in digital twins and their applications in supply chain management.
Table 6. Key features in digital twins and their applications in supply chain management.
FeaturesApplications
Virtual representation
  • Virtual representations of machines, production lines, or entire facilities enables intelligent task execution and process improvement [161,162].
  • Simulates products, processes, and systems, enabling responses to different situations [158].
Real time visibility
  • Enables virtual testing to reduce material waste and downtime, supports employee training and process validation [163].
Continuous monitoring
  • Mimic real-time operation for continuous monitoring [164,165].
  • Sends live data to cloud platforms for disruption prediction and scenario simulations [166].
  • Empowers manufacturers to assess risks, estimate costs, and refine processes before large-scale changes [167,168].
Immersive training simulations
  • Realistic VR flight and maintenance simulators, combined with AR-guided field training, prepare technicians, and operators without real-world risks [169].
Remote collaboration and stakeholder engagement
  • Immersive AR/VR experiences engage stakeholders by demonstrating their activities and opinions in an interactive way [170]. For instance, a VR tour of a SAF production site can show investors and regulators the supply chain and sustainability practices first-hand.
Table 7. Steps and Criteria of the Integrative Literature Review.
Table 7. Steps and Criteria of the Integrative Literature Review.
Step 1: Identify disruptive technologies in industry 4.0
Criteria: Q1: Does the selected paper provide a literature review of various technologies in industry 4.0? Q2: Is the selected resource from a reputable journal with high impact factor or citation as indicated in Google scholar?
  • Keywords: “industry 4.0” and “literature review”; “industry 4.0” and “review studies”
  • Summarized: n = 11 represented literature review articles about Industry 4.0
  • Identified: 5 broad set of disruptive technologies associated with Industry 4.0 from a supply chain perspective, including blockchain, AI, IoT, 3D printing, and simulations, as shown in Figure 2.
Step 2: Disruptive technologies in supply chain and their applications
Criteria: Q1: Does the selected article provide reviews that enhance understanding of Industry 4.0 and its representative technologies? Q2: Does the selected article provide knowledge that stresses the applications of Industry 4.0 in supply chain management?
  • Keywords used in blockchain: “Distributed Ledger technology (DLT)”, “Smart contract”, “Tokenization”.
  • Keywords used in AI: “machine learning (ML)”, “natural language processing (NLP)”, “computer vision”, “robotic process automation (RPA)”, and “generative AI (GAI)”
  • Other keywords: “Internet of Things (IoT)”, “cloud computing”, “edge computing”, “3D printing”, “additive manufacturing,” “simulations”, “Digital Twins (DT)”, “AR/VR”
  • Summarized: n = 121 representative publications on specific technologies under each disruptive technology.
  • Presented and detailed: their definitions, key features and applications in supply chain, as illustrated in Table 2, Table 3, Table 4, Table 5 and Table 6
Step 3: Industry 4.0 disruptive technologies in SAF Grand Challenge
Criteria: Q1: Does the selected article discuss the application of Industry 4.0 technologies in at least one of the following SAF Grand Challenge workstreams: “Feedstock Innovation”, “Conversion Technology”, “Building Supply Chains”, “Policy and Valuation”, “Enabling End Use” or “Communicating Progress”? Q2: Does the selected article discuss at least one key action areas under Grand Challenge workstreams in relation to disruptive technologies in Industry 4.0?
  • Keywords used in the intersection of Industry 4.0 and SAF Grand Challenge: “Industry 4.0 in SAF” or “Industry 4.0 in biofuels”, or “Industry 4.0 in renewable fuels”
  • Conducted content analysis: n = 177 representative publications reviewing Industry 4.0 technologies under each SAF workstream (included snowballing).
  • Summarized: the represented disruptive technologies under each SAF Grand Challenge workstream and their corresponding key action areas as shown in Table 8.
Inclusion criteria:
  • Databases: EBSCOhost, Emerald, Wiley, Taylor and Francis, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Springer, and Web of Science. Additional searches for white papers, newspaper articles, company websites, and brochures were performed using Google’s search engine
  • English language only
  • Articles, books, and grey literature, conference papers, newspaper articles, company websites, and brochures company websites, and brochures are included
  • Included timeframe from 2011 to present as Industry 4.0 was invented in 2011.
Table 8. Overview of Industry 4.0 applications within SAF commercialization framework.
Table 8. Overview of Industry 4.0 applications within SAF commercialization framework.
WorkstreamsKey Action AreasIndustry 4.0 TechnologiesApplications
Feedstock InnovationResource Market and Availability AnalysisAI, Big Data, Blockchain, Cloud ComputingForecasting, traceability, market optimization, resource allocation
Increase Sustainable Lipid SupplyAI, ML, Blockchain, IoTPrecision agriculture, lipid recovery, waste tracking, IoT monitoring
Boost Biomass Production and Waste CollectionIoT, AI, Autonomous RobotsBiomass monitoring, waste sorting, collection optimization, autonomous handling
Improve Feedstock Supply LogisticsAI, IoT, Blockchain, Edge ComputingRoute optimization, real-time tracking, smart contracts, local analytics
Improve Feedstock Handling ReliabilityAI, Digital Twins, Robotics, Edge ComputingPredictive maintenance, handling simulation, automated preprocessing, on-site analytics
Enhance Sustainability of Biomass SupplyAI, Blockchain, IoTLife cycle assessment, sustainability tracking, environmental monitoring
Conversion TechnologyDecarbonize and Scale Fermentation-Based FuelsAI, ML, IoT, Blockchain, Edge ComputingProcess optimization, fermentation control, emission tracking, real-time data
Enhance ASTM PathwaysDigital Twins, AI, Blockchain, 3D PrintingProcess simulation, rapid prototyping, compliance tracking, virtual testing
Develop Bio-IntermediatesAI, Cyber-physical Systems, 3D PrintingMolecule screening, automated conversion, prototype catalysts
Reduce Risk and Scale UpAI, Digital Twins, BlockchainPredictive maintenance, scale-up simulation, supply chain transparency
Develop Innovative PathwaysAI, IoT, AutomationReaction modeling, process automation, real-time monitoring
Building Supply ChainsEstablish Regional CoalitionsBlockchain, Cloud, Smart ContractsStakeholder collaboration, secure data sharing, automated agreements
Model SAF Supply ChainsAI, Big Data, IoT, Edge ComputingDemand forecasting, route optimization, real-time analytics
Demonstrate Regional Supply ChainsAI, Digital Twins, 3D PrintingPilot simulation, component prototyping, performance optimization
Develop Production InfrastructureAI, Robotics, Automation, BlockchainAutomated operations, infrastructure monitoring, transparent build-out
Policy and ValuationImprove Environmental Data and ModelsAI, Big Data, Blockchain, Cloud ComputingData aggregation, LCA modeling, emission verification
Techno-Economic Feasibility AnalysisAI, Digital Twins, Edge ComputingCost modeling, scenario analysis, real-time feasibility
Contribute to SAF Policy DevelopmentAI, Blockchain, Cloud ComputingPolicy modeling, transparent reporting, incentive tracking
Enabling End UseSupport Evaluation and TestingAI, Digital Twins, Blockchain, AutomationPerformance simulation, test automation, data logging
Adopt High-Percentage SAF BlendsAI, Cyber-Physical Systems, SensorsBlend optimization, engine monitoring, real-time adjustment
Explore Synthetic Jet FuelsAI, 3D Printing, AutomationMolecule design, catalyst development, experimental validation
Adapt InfrastructureIoT, Blockchain, AIFlow tracking, infrastructure readiness, compliance monitoring
Communicating ProgressEngage StakeholdersAI, Blockchain, Cloud ComputingSecure communication, trust building, multi-party data sharing
Assess Benefits and InfluenceAI, Digital Twins, Cloud ComputingImpact quantification, visualization, scenario simulation
Track SAF Grand ChallengeIoT, Blockchain, AI, Cloud ComputingKPI monitoring, automated reporting, real-time dashboards
Share Positive ImpactsAI, AR/VR, Blockchain, Sentiment AnalysisImmersive visualization, public engagement, verified impact
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ebrahimi, S.; Chen, J.; Bridgelall, R.; Szmerekovsky, J.; Motwani, J. Unlocking the Commercialization of SAF Through Integration of Industry 4.0: A Technological Perspective. Sustainability 2025, 17, 7325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167325

AMA Style

Ebrahimi S, Chen J, Bridgelall R, Szmerekovsky J, Motwani J. Unlocking the Commercialization of SAF Through Integration of Industry 4.0: A Technological Perspective. Sustainability. 2025; 17(16):7325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167325

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ebrahimi, Sajad, Jing Chen, Raj Bridgelall, Joseph Szmerekovsky, and Jaideep Motwani. 2025. "Unlocking the Commercialization of SAF Through Integration of Industry 4.0: A Technological Perspective" Sustainability 17, no. 16: 7325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167325

APA Style

Ebrahimi, S., Chen, J., Bridgelall, R., Szmerekovsky, J., & Motwani, J. (2025). Unlocking the Commercialization of SAF Through Integration of Industry 4.0: A Technological Perspective. Sustainability, 17(16), 7325. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17167325

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop