This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessArticle
Dynamic Evaluation of Forest Carbon Sink Efficiency and Its Driver Configurational Identification in China: A Sustainable Forestry Perspective
by
Yingyiwen Ding
Yingyiwen Ding 1,2,
Jing Zhao
Jing Zhao 1,2,* and
Chunhua Li
Chunhua Li 3,*
1
College of Economics and Management, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
2
Key Research Base of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Universities of Hunan Province “Research Center for High-Quality Development of Industrial Economy”, Changsha 410003, China
3
College of National Parks and Tourism, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2025, 17(13), 5931; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135931 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 18 May 2025
/
Revised: 22 June 2025
/
Accepted: 24 June 2025
/
Published: 27 June 2025
Abstract
Improving forest carbon sink efficiency (FCSE) is the key to mitigating climate change and achieving sustainable forest resource management in China. However, current research on FCSE remains predominantly focused on static perspectives and singular linear effects. Based on panel data from 30 provinces (autonomous regions and municipalities) in China from 2008 to 2022, this study integrated the super-efficiency Slack-Based Measure (SBM)-Malmquist–Luenberger (ML) model, spatial autocorrelation analysis, and dynamic fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) to reveal the spatiotemporal differentiation characteristics of FCSE and the multi-factor synergistic driving mechanism. The results showed that (1) the average value of the FCSE in China was 1.1. Technological progress (with an average technological change of 1.21) is the core growth driver, but the imbalance of technological efficiency change (EC) among regions restricts long-term sustainability. (2) The spatial distribution exhibited a U-shaped gradient pattern of “eastern—southwestern”, and the synergy effect between nature and economy is significant. (3) The dynamic fsQCA identified three sustainable improvement paths: the “precipitation–economy” collaborative type, the multi-factor co-creation type, and “precipitation–industry-driven” type; precipitation was the universal core condition. (4) Regional differences exist in path application; the eastern part depends on economic coordination, the central part is suitable for industry driving, and the western part requires multi-factor linkage. By introducing a dynamic configuration perspective, analyzing FCSE’s spatiotemporal drivers. We propose a sustainable ‘Nature–Society–Management’ interaction framework and region-specific policy strategies, offering both theoretical and practical tools for sustainable forestry policy design.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Ding, Y.; Zhao, J.; Li, C.
Dynamic Evaluation of Forest Carbon Sink Efficiency and Its Driver Configurational Identification in China: A Sustainable Forestry Perspective. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5931.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135931
AMA Style
Ding Y, Zhao J, Li C.
Dynamic Evaluation of Forest Carbon Sink Efficiency and Its Driver Configurational Identification in China: A Sustainable Forestry Perspective. Sustainability. 2025; 17(13):5931.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135931
Chicago/Turabian Style
Ding, Yingyiwen, Jing Zhao, and Chunhua Li.
2025. "Dynamic Evaluation of Forest Carbon Sink Efficiency and Its Driver Configurational Identification in China: A Sustainable Forestry Perspective" Sustainability 17, no. 13: 5931.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135931
APA Style
Ding, Y., Zhao, J., & Li, C.
(2025). Dynamic Evaluation of Forest Carbon Sink Efficiency and Its Driver Configurational Identification in China: A Sustainable Forestry Perspective. Sustainability, 17(13), 5931.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135931
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.