Fostering Sustainable Livelihoods and Community Resilience in a Depopulated Japanese Mountainous Settlement: Connecting Local Culture and Ikigai-Zukuri Through the Ōsawa Engawa Café
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Research Framework
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Study Area
3.1.1. Ōsawa, a Traditional Tea-Growing Section in Shizuoka Prefecture, Japan
3.1.2. Local Culture and Community Life
3.1.3. From Tradition to Local Innovation: The Community-Initiated Engawa Café
3.2. Study Design
4. Results
4.1. Socio-Spatial Preconditions for the Engawa Café Project
4.1.1. Demographic Changes and Agricultural Resilience in Ōsawa
4.1.2. Spatial Characteristics and Landscape Dynamics in Ōsawa
4.1.3. Livelihood, Lifestyle, and the Continuing Landscape
4.1.4. Spatial Reinterpretation and Cultural Continuity: Three Forms of the Engawa Café
4.2. Structural Foundations and Ikigai-Driven Logic Behind the Engawa Café Project
4.2.1. Multi-Actor Coordination and Implementation Mechanism
4.2.2. Women’s Participation and the Everyday Practice of Ikigai
4.2.3. Sustaining the Engawa Café: A Multi-Source Support Framework
4.3. Evolving Participation and Support Structures of the Engawa Café
4.3.1. Flexibility in Participation: Household-Specific Operational Models
4.3.2. From Economic Motives to Ikigai Realization: The Deepening Dynamics of Residents
4.3.3. Factors Influencing Engawa Café Operational Status: A Household-Level Analysis
4.3.4. Post-Pandemic Visitor Shifts: Deepening Bonds and the Rise of the Related Population
“I felt lonely during the pandemic, so I came back as soon as the Café reopened. I visit almost every time.”(C1)
“We’ve become good friends. I even invited them to visit my home.”(C7)
“I bring tea that I personally enjoy sharing with the residents.”(C8)
“The air, the landscape, the food, and the people here make me feel truly relaxed.”(C3)
4.3.5. External Support and Family Collaboration: Key Determinants of Café Continuity
5. Discussion
5.1. The Underlying Logic of Rural Livelihoods: A Case Study of the Ōsawa Marginal Settlement
5.2. Defining Ikigai-Zukuri (Enhancing Life Purpose) and Its Significance
5.3. Repositioning Roles for Rural Continuity: Insights from Ōsawa’s Six Actors Framework
5.3.1. Local Participation as the Foundation of Ikigai-Zukuri
5.3.2. External Relations: Building Emotional and Functional Linkages
5.3.3. Deepening Exchange: From Communication to Relationship Population
5.3.4. The Role of Locally Informed Experts and Supportive Institutions
5.4. Landscapes of Participation: The Role of Cultural Space in Sustaining Ikigai-Zukuri
5.4.1. The Role of RCLs in Supporting Ikigai-Zukuri
5.4.2. From Inhabitation to Involvement: Landscape as Shared Space
5.4.3. Ikigai-Zukuri as an RCL-Preserving Practice
5.5. Limitations of Ikigai-Zukuri
6. Conclusions
7. Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Motivation Category | Early Stage (Community Participation) | Later Stage (Achieve Ikigai) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Examples of Participant Statements | IDs | Examples of Ikigai Statements | IDs | |
Community Support | “I was a member of the local revitalization group.” | ID. 10, 19, 21 | “Since we stopped farming, we had little interaction with neighbors. Now, running the café helps us reconnect with them.” | ID. 17 |
“I joined to support community activities.” | ID. 12, 13, 17 | “We were always close-knit, but sharing leftover tea snacks after closing feels especially nice.” | ID. 6, 10, 14 | |
“Neighbors come to help or chat with us and visitors.” | ID. 2, 6, 8, 10 | |||
Economic Benefits | “I wanted to expand my tea sales channels.” | ID. 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 18, 19, 21 | – | – |
Cultural Passion | “I wanted more people to know about our tea.” | ID. 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 14, 18, 19, 21 | “Visitors are interested in rural life; I let them experience tea picking, wood chopping, or making fires.” | ID. 14, 17, 19, 21 |
“I wanted visitors to taste our traditional local tea varieties (Zairai).” | ID. 14, 19, 21 | “I feel extremely happy when I see visitors enjoying our tea.” | ID. 2, 6, 8, 10, 14, 17, 19, 21 | |
“Even though our traditional tea doesn’t sell well commercially, visitor enthusiasm convinces me that it’s valuable.” | ID. 14,21 | |||
“I enjoy letting visitors taste and learn about various types of tea we produce.” | ID. 2, 14, 19 | |||
Personal Interests | “I enjoy socializing with people.” | ID. 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 14, 15, 18, 19 | “I’m good at woodworking/gardening/crafts, which helps decorate my café.” | ID. 2, 6, 17 |
“I love cooking.” | ID. 5, 6, 10, 15, 17, 18, 21 | “Our cat/pet is the café mascot.” | ID. 2, 21 | |
“Visitors love my cooking; sometimes I pack extra for them to take home.” | ID. 6, 14, 21 | |||
“I truly enjoy chatting with visitors from various places.” | ID. 2, 6, 8, 10, 14, 17, 19, 21 | |||
Family Interaction | – | – | “My children used to visit only once or twice a year; now they frequently return to help, which makes me happy.” | ID. 2, 6, 8, 10, 14, 21 |
“My relatives seldom visited before, but now they often come as a family to help and spend time together.” | ID. 10, 17 | |||
“My daughter even designed our tea packaging logo and started an Instagram account.” | ID. 2 |
ID | Family Composition | About Engawa Café | Tea Production | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | Age | Agr. | Task Distribution | Tea Snack Menu | New Varieties | “Zairai” Variety | Tea Factory | |
Operating Household (n = 8) | ||||||||
2 | M | 90s | ○ | Host | Sponge cake, Nimono | Y | Y | Y |
M | 60s | ◉ | Prep/Host | |||||
F | 60s | ◉ | Prep/Cook/Host | |||||
★F | 30s | ○ | Host | |||||
6 | F | 90s | ○ | Host | Roasted potato, Side dish | Y | Y | Y |
M | 60s | ● | Prep/Host | |||||
F | 60s | ● | Prep/Cook/Host | |||||
★F | 20s | ○ | Prep | |||||
8 | M | 70s | ◉ | – | Warabi Mochi, Pickles | Y | N | Y |
F | 70s | ● | Prep/Cook/Host | |||||
★F | 30s | ○ | Host | |||||
10 | F | 80s | ● | Prep/Cook/Host | Oshiruko, Taro Mochi, Pickles | Y | N | Y |
M | 60s | ◉ | – | |||||
F | 60s | ○ | Host/Cook | |||||
M | 20s | ○ | – | |||||
★M | 30s | ○ | – | |||||
★M | 60s | ○ | Host | |||||
14 | M | 70s | ◉ | Prep/Cook/Host | Okonomi-yaki, Tonjiru | Y | Y | Y |
F | 70s | ● | Prep/Cook/Host | |||||
★M | 40s | ○ | Host | |||||
★F | 30s | ○ | Cook/Host | |||||
17 | M | 60s | ○ | Prep/Cook | Wood-fired pizza | – | – | – |
F | 50s | ○ | Prep/Host | |||||
★M | 20s | ○ | Prep | |||||
★M | 60s | ○ | Host | |||||
★F | 60s | ○ | Prep/Host | |||||
19 | M | 70s | ◉ | Prep/Host | Steamed cake, Nimono | Y | Y | Y |
F | 70s | ● | Prep/Cook/Host | |||||
★M | 40s | ○ | – | |||||
21 | M | 70s | ◉ | Prep/Host | Potato mochi, Tempura | Y | Y | Y |
F | 70s | ● | Prep/Cook/Host | |||||
★F | 40s | ○ | Prep/Host | |||||
★M | 30s | ○ | Host | |||||
Discontinued Household (n = 7) | ||||||||
4 | F | 80s | ○ | Prep/Cook/Host | Nimono, Pickles | Y | Y | Y |
M | 60s | ◉ | – | |||||
F | 50s | ◉ | – | |||||
★F | 30s | ○ | Host | |||||
5 | F | 70s | ○ | Prep/Cook/Host | Konjac-based dishes, Pickles | Y | Y | Y |
F | 50s | ◉ | – | |||||
F | 30s | ○ | – | |||||
F | 0s | ○ | – | |||||
★F | 30s | ○ | Prep | |||||
7 | F | 70s | ● | Prep/Cook/Host | Nimono, Pickles | Y | N | – |
F | 50s | ◉ | – | |||||
F | 10s | ○ | – | |||||
F | 10s | ○ | – | |||||
12 | F | 80s | ● | Prep/Cook/Host | Nimono, Pickles | Y | N | – |
★M | 50s | ○ | Prep | |||||
13 | F | 90s | ○ | Prep/Cook/Host | Nimono, Pickles | – | – | – |
★F | 60s | ○ | Prep/Cook | |||||
15 | M | 80s | ● | Prep/Host | Nimono, Pickles, Manju | Y | N | N |
F | 70s | ○ | Prep/Cook/Host | |||||
★F | 40s | ○ | Host | |||||
18 | M | 80s | ● | Prep/Host | Deep-fried food, mochi | Y | Y | Y |
M | 50s | ◉ | – | |||||
F | 50s | ◉ | – | |||||
M | 30s | ○ | – | |||||
F | 20s | ○ | Prep | |||||
Never Operated Household (n = 7) | ||||||||
1 | M | 60s | ○ | – | – | – | – | N |
3 | F | 80s | ○ | – | – | – | – | – |
★M | 50s | ○ | ||||||
9 | M | 80s | ○ | – | – | – | – | – |
11 | M | 70s | ◉ | – | – | Y | Y | Y |
F | 60s | ◉ | ||||||
★M | 30s | ○ | ||||||
16 | M | 60s | ○ | – | – | – | – | – |
M | 60s | ○ | ||||||
20 | M | 60s | ○ | – | – | – | – | – |
★M | 30s | ○ | ||||||
22 | M | 60s | ○ | – | – | – | – | – |
References
- Lewis, W.A. Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor. Manch. Sch. 1954, 22, 139–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harris, J.R.; Todaro, M.P. Migration, Unemployment and Development: A Two-Sector Analysis. Am. Econ. Rev. 1970, 60, 126–142. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.; Westlund, H.; Liu, Y. Why Some Rural Areas Decline While Some Others Not: An Overview of Rural Evolution in the World. J. Rural Stud. 2019, 68, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Sherbinin, A.; VanWey, L.K.; McSweeney, K.; Aggarwal, R.; Barbieri, A.; Henry, S.; Hunter, L.M.; Twine, W.; Walker, R. Rural Household Demographics, Livelihoods and the Environment. Glob. Environ. Change 2008, 18, 38–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delventhal, M.J.; Fernández-Villaverde, J.; Guner, N. Demographic Transitions Across Time and Space; Working Paper No. 29480; National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2021; Available online: https://www.nber.org/papers/w29480 (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Kinsella, K.G.; Phillips, D.R. Global Aging: The Challenge of Success; Population Reference Bureau: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; Volume 60, No. 1; p. 3. Available online: https://www.prb.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/03012005-60.1GlobalAging.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Li, Y.; Westlund, H.; Zheng, X.; Liu, Y. Bottom-Up Initiatives and Revival in the Face of Rural Decline: Case Studies from China and Sweden. J. Rural Stud. 2016, 47 Pt B, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lipton, M. Migration from Rural Areas of Poor Countries: The Impact on Rural Productivity and Income Distribution. World Dev. 1980, 8, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dax, T.; Fischer, M. An Alternative Policy Approach to Rural Development in Regions Facing Population Decline. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2017, 26, 297–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahrendt, B.; Nikolaus, R.S.; Zilinski, J. Ikigai—A Japanese Life Philosophy: That for Which It Is Worth Getting up in the Morning. In Organizational Ikigai; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2024; pp. 3–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujimori, K. Determinants of “Ikigai” Among the Elderly—An Analysis Focusing on Roles and Sense of Loneliness. In Survey on Daily Life and Community Participation of the Elderly, FY 2021; Cabinet Office, Government of Japan: Tokyo, Japan, 2021; Chapter 3. Available online: https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/ishiki/r03/zentai/pdf_index.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Salvia, R.; Quaranta, G. Place-Based Rural Development and Resilience: A Lesson from a Small Community. Sustainability 2017, 9, 889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahon, M.; Fahy, F.; Ó Cinnéide, M. The significance of quality of life and sustainability at the urban–rural fringe in the making of place-based community. GeoJournal 2012, 77, 265–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vercher, N.; Barlagne, C.; Hewitt, R.; Nijnik, M.; Esparcia, J. Whose Narrative is it Anyway? Narratives of Social Innovation in Rural Areas—A Comparative Analysis of Community-Led Initiatives in Scotland and Spain. Sociol. Rural. 2021, 61, 163–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markeson, B.; Deller, S. Growth of rural us non-farm proprietors with a focus on amenities. Rev. Urban Reg. Dev. Stud. 2012, 24, 83–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Walters, W.H. Types and Patterns of Later-life Migration. Geogr. Ann. Ser. B Hum. Geogr. 2000, 82, 129–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Li, Y.; Xu, C. Land consolidation and rural revitalization in China: Mechanisms and paths. Land Use Policy 2020, 91, 104379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, M.; Zhou, Y.; Huang, X.; Ye, C. The Integration of New-Type Urbanization and Rural Revitalization Strategies in China: Origin, Reality and Future Trends. Land 2021, 10, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mormont, M. Who Is Rural? or, How To Be Rural: Towards a Sociology of The Rural. In Rural Restructuring: Global Processes and Their Responses; Lowe, P., Marsden, T., Eds.; Routledge: London, UK, 1990; p. 24. [Google Scholar]
- Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Annual Report on the Ageing Society. 2024. Available online: https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/whitepaper/w-2024/zenbun/06pdf_index.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Ohno, A. An Introduction to Mountain Village Environmental Sociology: Marginalization of Modern Mountain Villages and Watershed Co-Management; Rural Culture Association: Toda, Japan, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Nakao, R.; Nitta, A.; Yumiba, M.; Ota, K.; Kamohara, S.; Ohnishi, M. Factors related to ikigai among older residents participating in hillside residential community-based activities in Nagasaki City, Japan. J. Rural Med. 2021, 16, 42–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wilkes, J.; Garip, G.; Kotera, Y.; Fido, D. Can Ikigai Predict Anxiety, Depression, and Well-being? Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 2023, 21, 2941–2953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okuzono, S.S.; Shiba, K.; Kim, E.S.; Shirai, K.; Kondo, N.; Fujiwara, T.; Kondo, K.; Lomas, T.; Trudel-Fitzgerald, C.; Kawachi, I.; et al. Ikigai and subsequent health and wellbeing among Japanese older adults: Longitudinal outcome-wide analysis. Lancet Reg. Health—West. Pac. 2022, 21, 100391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan. Regarding the Promotion Project for the Purpose in Life and Health of the Elderly. Notification No. 187. 19 October 1989. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/web/t_doc?dataId=00ta4255&dataType=1&pageNo=1 (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan. On Creating a Purposeful Life for the Elderly. Presentation Material. 18 January 2018. Available online: https://www.soumu.go.jp/main_content/000528166.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Yamamoto, T. Sense of Ikigai among Elderly Residents in Marginal Settlements: A Field Survey in the Mountain Villages of the Chūgoku Region, Ikigai Kenkyu. J. Ikigai Stud. 2016, 22, 48–67. [Google Scholar]
- Otsuki, Y. Extension Projects for Life Improvement and Ikigai among Female Farmers. Agric. Hortic. 2018, 93, 212–230. [Google Scholar]
- Kumano, M. On the Concept of Well-Being in Japan: Feeling Shiawase as Hedonic Well-Being and Feeling Ikigai as Eudaimonic Well-Being. Appl. Res. Qual. Life 2018, 13, 419–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Okamoto, H. Factors related to the fulfillment of activity intention among older women living at home: Based on a survey by the Ikigai Creation Committee in N Ward, Osaka City. J. Soc. Welf. Sci. 2004, 45, 91–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, J.F. Conceptual Engawa: The Experience of Ring-Based Circulation in Tadao Ando Museums. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 2014, 41, 229–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ogawa, N. What Is Regional Revitalization? The Duality of Regional Revitalization. J. Urban Manag. Local Gov. Res. 2013, 28, 42–53. [Google Scholar]
- Ogawa, N. Regional Revitalization and Local Creation. Onomichi City Univ. Econ. Inf. Bull. 2016, 16, 17–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oono, A. Genkai Shuraku to Chiiki Saisei; Kyoto Shimbun Publish Center: Kyoto, Japan, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Kameda, S. Issues in Hilly and Mountainous Areas: Focusing Mainly on the Direct Payment System. Ref. Jpn. Natl. Diet Libr. 2009, 59, 5–26. [Google Scholar]
- Lichter, D.T.; Brown, D.L.; Parisi, D. The rural–urban interface: Rural and small town growth at the metropolitan fringe. Popul. Space Place 2021, 27, e2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albrecht, D.E. Rural/urban differences: Persistence or decline. Rural. Sociol. 2022, 87, 1137–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Goodman, R.M.; Speers, M.A.; McLeroy, K.; Fawcett, S.; Kegler, M.; Parker, E.; Smith, S.R.; Sterling, T.D.; Wallerstein, N. Identifying and Defining the Dimensions of Community Capacity to Provide a Basis for Measurement. Health Educ. Behav. 1998, 25, 258–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creed, G.W. “Family Values” and Domestic Economies. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2000, 29, 329–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shanin, T. The Nature and Logic of the Peasant Economy I: A Generalisation. J. Peasant Stud. 1973, 1, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hashizume, N. Population Dynamics and Transformation of Agricultural Villages in Mountainous Regions: Statistical Analysis Using Small Area Data. Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/primaff/kanko/project/R03syuraku.html (accessed on 4 January 2025).
- Ohe, Y. Overcoming Challenges toward Sustainable Rural Tourism: A Perspective of Community-Based Tourism. J. Rural Plan. Assoc. 2019, 38, 10–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lysgård, H.K. The ‘actually existing’ cultural policy and culture-led strategies of rural places and small towns. J. Rural. Stud. 2016, 44, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feldhoff, T. Shrinking communities in Japan: Community ownership of assets as a development potential for rural Japan? Urban Des. Int. 2013, 18, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takano, K. Current circumstances and problems of locality groups in a depopulated area in an ageing society. J. Welf. Sociol. 2011, 8, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Overview of the Integrated Community Support Project for Preventive Care and Daily Life Support. Presented at the 1st Meeting of Prefectural Advisors and Officers on Community-Based Care Prevention Promotion, Tokyo, Japan, 19 May 2015. Available online: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000192992.html (accessed on 1 April 2025).
- Townsend, B.G.; Chen, J.T.H.; Wuthrich, V.M. Barriers and Facilitators to Social Participation in Older Adults: A Systematic Literature Review. Clin. Gerontol. 2021, 44, 359–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Claval, P. Reading the rural landscapes. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2005, 70, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wheeler, R. Mining memories in a rural community: Landscape, temporality and place identity. J. Rural. Stud. 2014, 36, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lewicka, M. Place attachment, place identity, and place memory: Restoring the forgotten city past. J. Environ. Psychol. 2008, 28, 209–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, K. Satisfied with people or place? A study of the relationship between social ties, place attachment, and residential satisfaction among relocatees. Cities 2025, 159, 105746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Matarrita-Cascante, D.; Trejos, B.; Qin, H.; Joo, D.; Debner, S. Conceptualizing community resilience: Revisiting conceptual distinctions. Community Dev. 2016, 48, 105–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shizuoka Prefectural Government. Shizuoka Tea Capital Map and Related Materials on Tea Industry in Shizuoka. Available online: https://www.pref.shizuoka.jp/sangyoshigoto/nogyo/chanomiyako/1040637/1027288.html (accessed on 13 April 2025).
- Shizuoka Prefectural Government. Status of Municipal Mergers in the Prefecture. Available online: https://www.pref.shizuoka.jp/machizukuri/chiikishinko/gappei/index.html (accessed on 15 January 2025).
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan. Farmland Parcel Data (Plot-Level Polygon). Available online: https://open.fude.maff.go.jp/ (accessed on 14 November 2022).
- Village History of Tamagawa, Abe District—Middle Volume. Abe District/Tamagawa Village, Shizuoka, Japan. 1913. Available online: https://multi.tosyokan.pref.shizuoka.jp/digital-library/detail?tilcod=0000000027-SZ01005029 (accessed on 11 May 2025).
- New Tamagawa Village History Editorial Committee (Ed.) Kiyoranaru Sanga: Aratamagawa Sonshi; New Tamagawa Village History Editorial Committee: Tamagawa, Japan, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. 2020 Census of Agriculture and Forestry, Agricultural Settlement Card. Data Provided by GEOSTAT Co., Ltd. 2020. Available online: https://www.tiritoukei.co.jp/newpage17.html (accessed on 7 February 2023).
- Nawata, Y. On Characteristics of Local Community. Sociol. Law 1999, 51, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kikuchi, M. What is a Chōnaikai? Teikyo Sociol. 2002, 15, 63–101. [Google Scholar]
- Ōsawa Engawa Café. Distribution Map. Available online: https://tsunagari-osawa.com/engawa_cafe (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- IBM Corporation. IBM SPSS Statistics—CHAID Criteria. Available online: https://www.ibm.com/docs/en/spss-statistics/saas?topic=criteria-chaid (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Milanović, M.; Stamenković, M. CHAID Decision Tree: Methodological Frame and Application. Econ. Themes 2016, 54, 563–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Y.; Yi, F.; Deng, C.; Sun, G. Performance Analysis of the CHAID Algorithm for Accuracy. Mathematics 2023, 11, 2558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. Key Points for Tea Cultivation. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/j/seisan/gijutsuhasshin/techinfo/attach/pdf/cha-2.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- World Health Organization. Global Health Observatory—Life Expectancy at Birth (Years). Available online: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/life-expectancy-at-birth-(years) (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. Farmers Estimated to Live Longer than Non-Farmers: Especially Lower Mortality Rate from Cardiovascular Diseases. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/primaff/seika/pickup/2015/15_12.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Shimbun, A. Signs of Revival for Rare Indigenous Tea Varieties. Available online: http://www.asahi.com/area/shizuoka/articles/MTW20160127230250001.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Kapolka, N.M.; Dollhopf, D.J. Effect of Slope Gradient and Plant Growth on Soil Loss on Reconstructed Steep Slopes. Int. J. Surf. Min. Reclam. Environ. 2001, 15, 86–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). Cultural Landscapes. UNESCO World Heritage Convention. Available online: https://whc.unesco.org/en/culturallandscape/#2 (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Lengen, C.; Kistemann, T. Sense of Place and Place Identity: Review of Neuroscientific Evidence. Health Place 2012, 18, 1162–1171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takagi, M.; Ogawa, K.; Senda, M. The Function of Ro-Space in the House from the Showa Era: A Study Focused on the Transition of Children’s Play in Engawa and Roka. J. Archit. Plan. 1998, 63, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aoki, S. Research on the Using of “Engawa” in Farm-House (Scientific Basis of Planning Building). Trans. Archit. Inst. Jpn. 1957, 57.2, 9–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shibasaki, M.; Yamahata, N. The Evolution of Verandas in Japanese Homes and Their Modern Value. Research Reports of the Tohoku Branch of the Architectural Institute of Japan. Planning 2023, 86, 83–86. [Google Scholar]
- Hashimoto, S.; Yamashita, S.; Uno, H. A Study on the Relationship between Communication and the Purpose in Life of the Elderly—Focusing on the Use of SNS. Civ. Eng. Res. Publ. 2020, 76, I_209–I_220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ou, N.; Hanamitsu, N.; Wakisaka, S.; Mizuguchi, T.; Minamizawa, K. Enhancing Episodic Scene Imagery by Combining Pseudo-Action and Ambient Haptic Stimuli. Trans. Virtual Real. Soc. Jpn. 2023, 28, 339–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.J. Creating Memorable Experiences in a Reuse Heritage Site. Ann. Tour. Res. 2015, 55, 155–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McDonnell, T.E.; Bail, C.A.; Tavory, I. A Theory of Resonance. Sociol. Theory 2017, 35, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loureiro, S.M.C. The Role of the Rural Tourism Experience Economy in Place Attachment and Behavioral Intentions. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2014, 40, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hall, E.W. Continuity and Identity. Monist 1932, 42, 533–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kovách, I.; Kučerová, E. The Project Class in Central Europe: The Czech and Hungarian Cases. Sociol. Rural. 2006, 46, 3–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Ringle, C.M.; Jaafar, M.; Ramayah, T. Urban vs. Rural Destinations: Residents’ Perceptions, Community Participation and Support for Tourism Development. Tour. Manag. 2017, 60, 147–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. White Paper on Gender Equality 2003. Part I—Introduction—Section 4: Gender Equality in Family Life. Available online: https://www.gender.go.jp/about_danjo/whitepaper/h15/summary/danjyo/html/honpen/chap01_00_04.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Tsutsui, J. Gender Segregation of Housework in Japan: An Analysis Using NFRJ08. In The 3rd National Family Research of Japan (NFRJ08)—Second Report; Japan Society of Family Sociology, Ed.; National Family Research Committee: Tokyo, Japan, 2011; Volume 1, pp. 55–73. Available online: https://nfrj.org/nfrj08_publishing.htm (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Ishihara, T. Life Records of Rural Women. Quarterly Journal of the Policy Research Institute of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, No. 38. June 1998. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/primaff/kanko/kiho/38.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Takachi, S. A Study on the Current Situation and Social Participation of Women Farmers in Urban Agriculture. J. Rural. Life Soc. Jpn. 2024, 67, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. Materials Requested by Committee Members: On the Managerial Participation of Female Farmers. Council for Fundamental Problems of Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas, Agricultural Subcommittee. July 1998. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/j/study/nouson_kihon/pdf/nougyou9_data.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Saika, Y. Direct Payments for Hilly and Mountainous Areas in Japan. In Proceedings of the PRIMAFF Symposium on Less Favoured Areas, Part 3: The Current Status and Effects of Policies to Hilly and Mountainous Areas in Japan, Tokyo, Japan, 19 March 2010; Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan: Tokyo, Japan, 2010. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/primaff/e/results/symposium/2010.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Summary of the FY1996 Survey on the Awareness of Elderly People’s Health—Section 10: When Do You Feel Ikigai? Available online: https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/ishiki/h08_sougou/a15_10.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Saison Research Institute, Inc. Life and Consumption of People in Their 50s and 60s: Interaction, Fulfillment, and Leisure; SRI Research Report No. 13; A4 edition; Saison Research Institute, Inc.: Tokyo, Japan, 2001; 177p. Available online: https://dl.ndl.go.jp/view/download/digidepo_2392399_po_release20.pdf?contentNo=1 (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Ohe, Y. Exploring New Directions of Rural Tourism Under the New Normal: Micro-Tourism and Workcation. Jpn. J. Tour. Stud. 2022, 20, 51–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- JTB Tourism Research & Consulting Co. Glossary of Tourism Terms—Exchange Population. Available online: https://www.tourism.jp/tourism-database/glossary/exchange-population/ (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- JTB Tourism Research & Consulting Co. Glossary of Tourism Terms—Related Population. Available online: https://www.tourism.jp/tourism-database/glossary/related-population/ (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan. What Is “Relationship Population”? Regional Revitalization Group, Regional Self-Reliance Support Division. Available online: https://www.soumu.go.jp/kankeijinkou/about/index.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Tahara, H.; Shikida, A. Examining the Possibility of Transforming the Exchange Population into the Related Population. Tour. Stud. 2022, 34, 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sakuno, H. The Significance and Possibility of Relationship Population in Population Decline Society in Japan. Ann. Assoc. Econ. Geogr. 2019, 65, 10–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brandth, B.; Haugen, M.S. Farm Diversification into Tourism—Implications for Social Identity? J. Rural. Stud. 2011, 27, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Önder, T. Reconsideration of “Older People” in Super-Aged Rural Society, Japan. Soc. Cult. Stud. Kumamoto Univ. 2008, 6, 135–149. [Google Scholar]
- Tanno, K.; Sakata, K.; Ohsawa, M.; Onoda, T.; Itai, K.; Yaegashi, Y.; Tamakoshi, A.; JACC Study Group. Associations of Ikigai as a Positive Psychological Factor with All-Cause Mortality and Cause-Specific Mortality among Middle-Aged and Elderly Japanese People: Findings from the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study. J. Psychosom. Res. 2009, 67, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotera, Y.; Kaluzeviciute, G.; Garip, G.; McEwan, K.; Chamberlain, K. Health Benefits of Ikigai: A Review of Literature. University of Derby Institutional Repository. 2021. Available online: https://repository.derby.ac.uk/item/92qzv/health-benefits-of-ikigai-a-review-of-literature (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Yoshida, M.; Tatsukawa, M.; Otani, S.; Fujimura, K. Thoughts of Older Adults Living in an Isolated Community on a Remote Island While Continuing to Live in Familiar Surroundings. Jpn. J. Public Health 2025, 72, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arima, Y. Status Quo and the Challenge in Research on Paid Employment and Sense of Meaningful Life for Elders in Japan. Jpn. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020, 21, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Umeishi, N.; Tani, T.; Susumu, K.; Yasuda, M.; Oda, K.; Inoo, N.; Nakata, T.; Yasumura, K. Social Participation and Ikigai among Older Adults: The Relationship between Awareness and Factors Such as Employment and Volunteer Activities. Bull. Inst. Interdiscip. Stud. St. Andrew’s Univ. 2017, 43, 49–62. [Google Scholar]
- Sato, H. Ikigai and Its Determinants among the Elderly. In Survey on the Health of the Elderly, FY2022; Cabinet Office, Government of Japan: Tokyo, Japan, 2023. Available online: https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/ishiki/r04/html/index.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Wang, W.; Cheng, Y.; Saito, Y. Can the Relationship Population Contribute to Sustainable Rural Development? A Comparative Study of Out-Migrated Family Support in Depopulated Areas of Japan. Sustainability 2025, 17, 2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yamamoto-Mitani, N.; Ishigaki, K.; Kuniyoshi, M.; Kawahara-Maekawa, N.; Hasegawa, K.; Hayashi, K.; Sugishita, C. Impact of the Positive Appraisal of Care on Quality of Life, Purpose in Life, and Will to Continue Care among Japanese Family Caregivers of Older Adults: Analysis by Kinship Type. Jpn. J. Public Health 2002, 49, 660–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, T.G. Entrepreneurship and Development Finance: Keys to Rural Revitalization: Discussion. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1989, 71, 1324–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tsuchiya, M. From Provider of Knowledge to Collaborator: The Role of Specialists in Cultural Policy (1). J. Fac. Contemp. Policy Stud. Josai Univ. 2019, 12, 107–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lowe, P.; Phillipson, J.; Proctor, A.; Gkartzios, M. Expertise in Rural Development: A Conceptual and Empirical Analysis. World Dev. 2019, 116, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McAreavey, R.; McDonagh, J. Sustainable Rural Tourism: Lessons for Rural Development. Sociol. Rural. 2011, 51, 175–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shen, J.; Chou, R.-J. Rural Revitalization of Xiamei: The Development Experiences of Integrating Tea Tourism with Ancient Village Preservation. J. Rural. Stud. 2022, 90, 42–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baillie, B.; Chatzoglou, A.; Taha, S. Packaging the Past: The Commodification of Heritage. Herit. Manag. 2010, 3, 51–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, T.C. Heritage as a Tourism Commodity: Traversing the Tourist–Local Divide. Singap. J. Trop. Geogr. 1997, 18, 46–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buchecker, M.; Hunziker, M.; Kienast, F. Participatory Landscape Development: Overcoming Social Barriers to Public Involvement. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2003, 64, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan. Multifunctionality of Agriculture and Rural Areas. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/j/nousin/noukan/nougyo_kinou/index.html (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Fleischer, A.; Felsenstein, D. Support for Rural Tourism: Does It Make a Difference? Ann. Tour. Res. 2000, 27, 1007–1024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suárez, M.A.; Salas, E.L.; Franco, I.C.; Sousa, A.Á. Towards a Methodology of Good Practices for Heritage-Led Rural Regeneration: From the Main Paths to the Surrounding Areas. Cities 2025, 161, 105849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Japan. Strengthening the Connection Between Urban and Rural Areas. Supplementary Material, Policy Council on Rural Revitalization Subcommittee, FY2014. Available online: https://www.maff.go.jp/j/council/seisaku/nousin/bukai/h26_3/pdf/03_4_genti_siryo_hosoku.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
- Hiraguchi, Y.; Fukuda, R. Challenges and Development Directions for Resident-Led Farm Stays in Japan: A Case Study of Saikai City, Nagasaki Prefecture, under the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Rural. Econ. 2022, 94, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sumiyoshi, K. Reality of “Dual Habitation” in Japan and Its Relationship to Regional Revitalization: Case Study of the City of Minamiboso and Surrounding Area in Chiba Prefecture. Geogr. Rev. Jpn. Ser. A 2021, 94, 348–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ino, Y.; Ono, T.; Kobayashi, R.; Kurihara, S. Decision Making Structure of the Retired Who May Engage in Agriculture. Jpn. J. Farm Manag. 2008, 46, 124–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nomura, C. Worth Living of Elderly: A Concept Analysis. J. Jpn. Acad. Nurs. Sci. 2005, 25, 61–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maruyama, K. Household Budget and Ikigai of Elderly Households. Pension Stud. 2017, 7, 61–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Level and Concept | Theoretical Function and Key Concepts in Ōsawa | Contribution to Elderly Ikigai-Zukuri | Contribution to Community Resilience |
---|---|---|---|
Layer 1 Rural Cultural Landscape (RCL) | Provides a tangible and intangible foundation. Key concepts: cultural heritage, traditional land use, local ecological knowledge, symbolic meanings of landscape elements. | Offers meaningful daily-life contexts rooted in familiar cultural landscapes, nurturing purpose. | Forms the cultural and spatial foundation for community cohesion, strengthens place identity, and supports the preservation of rural cultural heritage. |
Layer 2 Place Identity and Attachment | Builds emotional/cognitive bonds to a place. Key concepts: sense of belonging, collective memory, ancestral ties, shared history and experiences. | Strengthens sense of belonging and emotional motivation for community contribution, grounding ikigai in place-based identity. | Enhances stewardship of local assets, mitigates out-migration, and reinforces the community’s socio-cultural fabric. |
Layer 3 Community Engagement (including family support from out-migrated members) | Encourages active involvement and integrates family support. Key concepts: social participation, collective action, caregiving, social networks, trust. | Enables enactment of ikigai through caregiving, family support, and participation in community activities; supports the elderly in fulfilling meaningful roles. | Builds social capital (trust, norms, networks), fosters collective efficacy, sustains intergenerational care, and maintains essential community functions. |
Layer 4 Regional Interaction (Beyond simple urban–rural exchange) | Facilitates integrated regional flows. Key concepts: urban–rural linkages, resource exchange, knowledge sharing, external support networks. | Provides mutual support and shared regional identity, reinforces ikigai through the recognition of rural roles within broader regional development. | Strengthens regional resilience by viewing rural revitalization as essential to overall regional sustainability; enables future rural in-migration and balanced urban–rural dynamics. |
Layer 5 Ikigai-zukuri | Central meaning-making process integrating family, community, and motivation. Key concepts: purpose-driven engagement, eudaimonic well-being, agency. | Core psychological driver: sustained by family support, community participation, and the elderly’s personal desire for a meaningful life. | Key internal force for proactive community action, well-being, cultural preservation, and adaptive community continuity. |
Layer 6 Community Resilience | Community’s adaptive capacity to navigate change while preserving identity/functions. Key concepts: adaptive capacity, social cohesion, continuity. | Provides an environment where community-based ikigai can flourish; protects the cultural and social life of rural communities. | Achieves sustainable well-being and resilience, integrating elderly participation, cultural preservation, and ikigai-driven community life. |
No. | Program | Program Details |
---|---|---|
1 | Host Organization | Ōsawa Promotion Association. |
2 | Opening Frequency | Twice a month: on the 2nd and 4th Sundays. |
3 | Operational Entity | Household. |
4 | Operating Location | The engawa spaces of individual households. |
5 | Visitor Fees | Pre-pandemic: 300 JPY/person. Post-pandemic: 500 JPY/person (increased due to rising costs). |
6 | Open Area for Visitors | Entire village open to visitors; free to visit operating households and stroll within the community. |
7 | Menu | Locally produced tea. Three types of tea snacks. |
8 | Activities | Annual participation in the Shizuoka City Tea Culture Exhibition and off-site promotional events. Every November: Hosting the Café Appreciation Festival within the village. |
ID | Representative | Household Structure | Farming Status (Yes/No) | Interview Type | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sex | Age | ||||
Operating Households (n = 8) | |||||
2 | Female | 60s | 2-generation family | Yes | Direct |
6 | Female | 60s | 2-generation family | Yes | Direct |
8 | Female | 70s | Elder couple | Yes | Direct |
10 | Female | 80s | 3-generation family | Yes | Direct |
14 | Male | 70s | Elder couple | Yes | Direct |
17 | Male | 60s | Couple | No | Direct |
19 | Female | 70s | Elder couple | Yes | Direct |
21 | Female | 70s | Elder couple | Yes | Direct |
Discontinued Households (n = 7) | |||||
4 | Female | 50s | 2-generation family | Yes | Proxy |
5 | Female | 50s | 4-generation family | Yes | Proxy |
7 | Female | 70s | 3-generation family | Yes | Direct |
12 | Female | 80s | Elder alone | Yes | Proxy |
13 | Female | 90s | Elder alone | No | Proxy |
15 | Male | 70s | Elder couple | Yes | Proxy |
18 | Male | 80s | 3-generation family | Yes | Proxy |
Never Operated Households (n = 7) | |||||
1 | Male | 60s | Elder alone | No | Proxy |
3 | Female | 80s | Elder alone | No | Proxy |
9 | Male | 80s | Elder alone | No | Proxy |
11 | Male | 70s | Elder couple | Yes | Proxy |
16 | Male | 60s | Sibling Household | No | Proxy |
20 | Male | 60s | Elder alone | No | Proxy |
22 | Male | 60s | Elder alone | No | Direct |
No. | Sex | Age | Organization and Position |
---|---|---|---|
Project Stakeholders (n = 2) | |||
A1 | Male | 40s | Shizuoka City government official; Engawa Café project leader. |
A2 | Male | 60s | Ōsawa representative; Local leader; Engawa Café project leader. |
Visitors (n = 7) | |||
C1 | Female | 60s | Resident of Shizuoka City; Repeat visitor. |
C2 | Male | 30s | Resident of Tokyo. |
C3 | Female | 30s | Resident of Shizuoka City; Repeat visitor. |
C4 | Female | 50s | Resident of Shizuoka City; Repeat visitor. |
C5 | Female | 30s | Resident of Shizuoka City; Repeat visitor. |
C6 | Male | 60s | Resident of Shizuoka City; Repeat visitor. |
C7 | Female | 60s | Resident of Shizuoka City; Repeat visitor. |
Café Operation | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Characteristic | Operating (n = 8) | Discontinued (n = 7) | Never Operated (n = 7) | ||||
f | % | f | % | f | % | ||
Female Household Member | Yes | 8 | 100.0% | 8 | 100.0% | 2 | 28.6% |
No | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 5 | 71.4% | |
Family Co-work | Yes | 6 | 75.0% | 1 | 12.5% | 0 | 0.0% |
No | 2 | 25.0% | 6 | 75.0% | 7 | 100.0% | |
High-frequency External Supporters | Yes | 7 | 87.5% | 5 | 62.5% | 0 | 0.0% |
No | 1 | 12.5% | 2 | 25.0% | 7 | 100.0% | |
Agriculture | Yes | 7 | 87.5% | 6 | 75.0% | 1 | 14.3% |
No | 1 | 12.5% | 1 | 12.5% | 6 | 85.7% |
Aspect | Pre-COVID-19 | Post-COVID-19 |
---|---|---|
Operational Duration | 9 June 2013–21 February 2020 | 26 March 2023–Present |
Avg. Annual Visitors | 5728 | 1251 (2024 data) |
Revenue per Session (JPY) | 10,000–20,000 | 4000–9000 |
Visitor Age Groups | 10s (3%), 20s (7%), 30s (16%), 40s (15%), 50s (23%), 60s (22%), 70s (12%), 80s (3%) | Data not collected |
Purpose of Visit | Interaction with locals (42%), Tea tasting (28%), Enjoying tea landscape (23%), Others (8%) | Data not collected |
Visitor Origin | Shizuoka City (63%), Shizuoka Prefecture (24%), Outside Prefecture (12%) | “Current visitors are mostly from Shizuoka City; visitors from outside Shizuoka prefecture have decreased.” (ID. 2, 6, 8, 10, 14, 17, 21) |
Frequency of Visit | Once (56%), Twice (13%), Three times (6%), 4–6 times (11%), 7–9 times (4%), ≥10 times (11%) | “Repeat visitors now account for the majority, including many from the pre-COVID-19.” (ID. 2, 6, 8, 10, 14, 17, 21) |
Resident Experiences | “I was happy seeing many people walking on our rural roads.” (ID. 10) | “Fewer visitors; fewer family members coming to help.” (ID. 2, 8, 14, 21) |
“There were often long queues outside; I felt sorry about the wait.” (ID. 6, 21) | “A bit lonely, but sharing leftover food with neighbors is nice.” (ID. 17) | |
“Busy but fulfilling, as visitors appreciated our food and tea.” (ID. 2, 6, 8, 10, 14, 21) | “Fewer visitors but more comfortable; I can chat deeply with each guest.” (ID. 2, 8) | |
“Sometimes too busy and exhausting, though rewarding.” (ID. 6, 21) | “I enjoy meaningful conversations with visitors from different places.” (ID. 6) | |
“Income wasn’t high but helpful for household expenses.” (ID. 8, 21) | “Income decreased, but some regular visitors keep buying tea.” (ID. 14) | |
“Some income reinvested in café facilities.” (ID. 2, 6, 8, 10, 14, 17, 21) | “Regular customers are like old friends; I’ll keep running the café for them.” (ID. 6, 8, 10, 14, 21) | |
“Used café earnings to visit Tokyo Disneyland with family.” (ID. 17) | “I cherish giving individual attention to each guest.” (ID. 10) | |
“Income dropped significantly, but deeper connections are rewarding.” (ID. 14, 21) | ||
“Lower income doesn’t matter much since earning money wasn’t the main goal; I’m happy having this opportunity for interaction.” (ID. 2, 6, 8, 10, 17) |
Category | Variable Name | Description | Value (Modalities) | f | % | p-Value | IV/DV |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Café Operation Status | Café Operation | Status of Engawa Café operation. | Operating | 8 | 36.4 | – | DV |
Discontinued | 7 | 31.8 | |||||
Never Operated | 7 | 31.8 | |||||
External Family Support | High-frequency External Supporters | Monthly or more frequent external family assistance for Café operation. | Yes | 12 | 54.5 | 0.002 | IV |
No | 10 | 45.5 | |||||
Low-frequency External Supporters | A few times per year, external family assistance. | Yes | 16 | 72.7 | – | IV | |
No | 6 | 27.3 | |||||
Household Internal Factors | Family Co-work | Family members cooperate and share responsibilities during Café operation. | Yes | 7 | 31.8 | 0.007 | IV |
No | 15 | 68.2 | |||||
Female Over 65 | Female family member aged 65 or older. | Yes | 12 | 54.5 | – | IV | |
No | 10 | 45.5 | |||||
Core Female | Presence of a female member actively leading café operations. | Yes | 13 | 59.1 | – | IV | |
No | 9 | 40.9 | |||||
Tea-related Factors | Fulltime Agr | Household member engaged in full-time agriculture. | Yes | 10 | 45.5 | 0.003 | IV |
No | 12 | 54.5 | |||||
Zairai Tea (native variety) | Household grows traditional Zairai tea. | Yes | 9 | 40.9 | – | IV | |
No | 13 | 59.1 | |||||
Agriculture | Household engages in agricultural activities. | Yes | 14 | 63.6 | – | IV | |
No | 8 | 36.4 |
Estimate | |
---|---|
Re-Substitution | Cross-Validation |
0.227 | 0.455 |
Operational Status | Predicted | % Correctly Classified | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Operating | Discontinued | Never Operated | |||
Observed | Operating | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Discontinued | 5 | 2 | 0 | 28.6% | |
Never Operated | 0 | 0 | 7 | 100.0% | |
Overall Percentage | 59.1% | 9.1% | 31.8% | 77.3% |
Role | Characteristics | Relationship to the Community | Functions Within the Community |
---|---|---|---|
Residents | Long-term elderly residents, mainly engaged in agriculture, own houses. | Core members of the community, responsible for daily production and operations. | Maintain traditional livelihoods, transmit culture, operate the Engawa Café, serve as bearers of the cultural landscape. |
Local Leader | Long-term residents with strong influence. | Opinion leaders and community organizers. | Coordinate consensus, mobilize residents, co-develop strategies, serve as drivers of projects. |
Related Population | Out-migrated family members with kinship ties. | Emotional and familial ties connect them to the community, return regularly. | Provide support during festivals, farming, and café operations; maintain intergenerational ties and sense of belonging. |
Exchange Population | Mainly urban tourists, short-term visitors. | Visitors and experience-seekers, potential supporters. | Provide emotional stimulation, cultural interaction, and economic consumption; partially transition into related population. |
Embedded Experts | Familiar with local society but not formal insiders. | Interact with residents over the long term; understand culture and resources. | Propose context-sensitive solutions (e.g., Engawa Café), act as “internal outsiders”. |
Government (Municipal/ National) | Provide institutional support and funding mechanisms. | Not involved in daily life, but act as supporting bodies. | Offer funding, coordinate resources, provide training, serve as institutional guarantees. |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Cheng, Y.; Wang, W.; Kinoshita, T.; Ikebe, K. Fostering Sustainable Livelihoods and Community Resilience in a Depopulated Japanese Mountainous Settlement: Connecting Local Culture and Ikigai-Zukuri Through the Ōsawa Engawa Café. Sustainability 2025, 17, 5174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115174
Cheng Y, Wang W, Kinoshita T, Ikebe K. Fostering Sustainable Livelihoods and Community Resilience in a Depopulated Japanese Mountainous Settlement: Connecting Local Culture and Ikigai-Zukuri Through the Ōsawa Engawa Café. Sustainability. 2025; 17(11):5174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115174
Chicago/Turabian StyleCheng, Yumeng, Wanqing Wang, Takeshi Kinoshita, and Konomi Ikebe. 2025. "Fostering Sustainable Livelihoods and Community Resilience in a Depopulated Japanese Mountainous Settlement: Connecting Local Culture and Ikigai-Zukuri Through the Ōsawa Engawa Café" Sustainability 17, no. 11: 5174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115174
APA StyleCheng, Y., Wang, W., Kinoshita, T., & Ikebe, K. (2025). Fostering Sustainable Livelihoods and Community Resilience in a Depopulated Japanese Mountainous Settlement: Connecting Local Culture and Ikigai-Zukuri Through the Ōsawa Engawa Café. Sustainability, 17(11), 5174. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17115174