Next Article in Journal
Characterizing Sustainability and Assessing Biophilic Design in Vernacular Architecture: Case of Kasbahs and Ksour in South of Morocco
Previous Article in Journal
Public Data Elements and Enterprise Digital Transformation: A Quasi-Natural Experiment Based on Open Government Data Platforms for Sustainable Urban Planning
Previous Article in Special Issue
Safety Culture in SMEs of the Food Industry: A Case Study and Best Practices
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Managerial Competence in Integrating Industry 4.0 with Corporate Social Responsibility for Enhanced Safety Culture in Manufacturing

by
Alain Patience Ihimbazwe Ndanguza
Faculty of Organization and Management, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Sustainability 2025, 17(10), 4678; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104678
Submission received: 28 April 2025 / Revised: 14 May 2025 / Accepted: 15 May 2025 / Published: 20 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Safety Culture in Manufacturing Enterprises)

Abstract

:
The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives offers transformative potential for enhancing safety culture in manufacturing. This study investigates how managerial competence facilitates the alignment of tools like the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and big data analytics with CSR principles to foster sustainable safety practices. Employing a qualitative methods approach with secondary data from 2010 to 2024, including case studies of some of five leading firms (Siemens, General Electric, Toyota, Bosch, and Ford) and a systematic literature review, this analysis uses thematic and statistical techniques. The results show that strategic integration significantly reduces workplace hazards by 30–50%, boosts employee engagement, and enhances operational efficiency through real-time monitoring, predictive maintenance, and CSR alignment. Managerial competence, encompassing strategic vision, technical expertise, and stakeholder engagement, is critical for aligning these domains, delivering enhanced safety, sustainability, and competitive advantages.

1. Introduction

The manufacturing sector is undergoing a significant transformation, driven by the emergence of Industry 4.0—a revolutionary paradigm that integrates cyber–physical systems, the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and big data analytics into industrial production [1]. Since the early 2010s, these technologies have enabled real-time data acquisition, predictive maintenance, and automation, thereby significantly enhancing operational efficiency and adaptability [2]. Concurrently, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has emerged as a strategic imperative, propelled by evolving regulatory frameworks and societal expectations for ethical practices, environmental sustainability, and employee well-being [3]. The European Union’s 2023 CSR Directive, for instance, mandates comprehensive reporting on sustainability and safety, reinforcing CSR’s role in corporate governance and aligning with global sustainability goals, such as the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda [4,5,6,7]. Despite these advancements, the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies with CSR to enhance safety culture, defined as shared values, beliefs, and practices prioritized in the workplace, remains underexplored, presenting a critical theoretical and practical gap [8]. While prior studies, such as Xu et al. (2018), have focused on Industry 4.0’s technological impacts [9], and others like Zohar (2010) have emphasized organizational safety culture [10], few have investigated how managerial competence can bridge these domains to foster sustainable safety practices, particularly in the context of regulatory mandates like the EU CSR Directive [11].
Safety culture, as conceptualized by Zohar (2010), involves collective perceptions and proactive risk management practices that minimize workplace incidents through leadership commitment, training, and technology [10]. A robust safety culture not only reduces accidents but also fosters employee trust and aligns with technological and ethical imperatives.
The intersection of Industry 4.0 and CSR offers a compelling opportunity to strengthen safety culture within manufacturing enterprises by leveraging real-time monitoring, predictive analytics, and CSR-driven training to create safer, more sustainable workplaces, aligning with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 8 (Decent Work) and 9 (Industry, Innovation, Infrastructure) [6]. This study advances stakeholder theory (Freeman et al., 2010 [12]) and the Natural-Resource-Based View (Hart, 2011 [13]) by proposing a novel framework that integrates technological and ethical dimensions through managerial competence, thereby addressing a gap in interdisciplinary scholarship on sustainable manufacturing [12,13].
This study addresses the following research question: How can managerial competence integrate Industry 4.0 technologies with CSR initiatives to foster a sustainable safety culture in manufacturing? The objective is to develop a theoretically grounded framework that enhances workplace safety, supports cleaner production, and provides actionable strategies for industry leaders. By synthesizing secondary data from 2010 to 2024, this study offers insights into sustainable safety practices through an interdisciplinary approach to industrial sustainability and occupational health. This paper is structured as follows: Section 2 reviews the literature on Industry 4.0, CSR, safety culture, and managerial competence; Section 3 details the qualitative methods research design and case study analysis; Section 4 presents the results; Section 5 discusses this study’s findings with regard to the state of the art; and Section 6 offers conclusions and future research directions. By synthesizing secondary data from 2010 to 2024, this study aims to guide manufacturers toward safer, more sustainable practices in a rapidly evolving industrial landscape.

2. Literature Review

This section synthesizes existing research on Industry 4.0, CSR, safety culture, and managerial competence to provide a theoretical and empirical foundation for this study. A systematic literature review was conducted to identify peer-reviewed articles and industry reports published between 2010 and 2024, sourced from the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The review followed a structured methodology: (1) keyword searches using terms such as “Industry 4.0”, “CSR”, “safety culture”, “managerial competence”, and “manufacturing”; (2) inclusion criteria requiring peer-reviewed articles or reputable industry reports with a focus on manufacturing; (3) the exclusion of non-English publications and studies lacking empirical or theoretical rigor; and (4) thematic analysis to categorize findings into the four subsections described below. We also synthesized foundational contributions like those of Kagermann et al. (2013), who investigated Industry 4.0’s technological framework [14], and Zohar (2010), who reported on safety culture’s organizational drivers [10], as well as the EU’s 2023 CSR Directive on regulatory imperatives [7]. These works provide a robust basis for this study’s novel integration of technological and ethical dimensions, advancing interdisciplinary scholarship in sustainable manufacturing [8].

2.1. Industry 4.0 and Its Impact on Manufacturing

Industry 4.0, which was conceptualized by Kagermann et al. (2013), marks the advent of the fourth industrial revolution, characterized by the convergence of digital, physical, and biological systems [15]. Since its emergence, technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) have facilitated the real-time monitoring of manufacturing processes and enabled predictive analytics for equipment maintenance, leading to substantial reductions in operational costs and downtime [16]. Recent findings from McKinsey’s 2023 report on digital manufacturing indicate a projected 35% increase in efficiency among firms adopting these tools by 2025, underscoring their transformative impact [17]. However, challenges such as workforce reskilling and job displacement due to automation persist, as noted in Xu et al.’s (2018) analysis of global trends from 2010 to 2018, with projections to 2020 [9]. This study builds on these findings by examining how Industry 4.0 technologies can enhance safety culture when aligned with CSR [18].
The rapid evolution of Industry 4.0 has been further propelled by the integration of 5G-enabled IoT and generative AI, as reported in Deloitte’s 2024 Manufacturing Outlook [19]. Insights derived from industry journals spanning 2021 to 2025 reveal that these technological advancements enable unprecedented precision in both production and safety management [20]. For instance, 5G connectivity significantly enhances IoT functionality by enabling high-speed data transmission, which supports real-time hazard detection, while generative AI facilitates the optimization of safety protocols [21]. Despite these advancements, significant barriers persist, including the substantial costs associated with implementation and the complexity of integrating emerging technologies into existing legacy systems [22]. As a result, Industry 4.0 presents both opportunities and challenges, necessitating strategic oversight to ensure its successful integration while maximizing its benefits for workplace safety and industrial sustainability [23].

2.2. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Manufacturing

Since 2010, Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has evolved from a peripheral concern to a core strategic priority within the manufacturing sector, driven by a growing recognition of its significance in fostering ethical and sustainable business practices [24]. CSR initiatives now extend beyond environmental sustainability to encompass fair labor practices and workplace safety, as reflected in the CSR disclosures of leading manufacturing firms such as Siemens and Toyota [25]. According to the 2022 KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting, 78% of manufacturing firms now embed safety metrics within their Corporate Social Responsibility strategies, highlighting a decade-long trend of merging social accountability with operational effectiveness [26]. The EU’s 2023 CSR Directive builds on earlier work by KPMG (2022), highlighting safety metrics’ role in CSR, which this study extends to Industry 4.0 integration [7,26]. This study leverages these insights to propose a framework for ethical governance in digitalized manufacturing.
This transformation has been further reinforced by evolving regulatory mandates and societal expectations. The European Union’s 2023 CSR Directive, for example, requires comprehensive reporting on both safety and sustainability initiatives, signaling the increasing institutionalization of CSR within corporate governance structures [5]. Industry reports published since 2020 have emphasized the role of CSR in strengthening corporate resilience and enhancing stakeholder trust, particularly in safety-critical industries [27]. Empirical evidence suggests that firms implementing CSR-driven safety programs have experienced higher employee retention rates and improved public perception, demonstrating the symbiotic relationship between CSR and workplace safety [28]. Consequently, CSR emerges not only as a compliance-driven obligation but as a strategic enabler that complements Industry 4.0 technologies in cultivating a holistic and sustainable safety culture within the manufacturing sector [29].

2.3. Safety Culture in Manufacturing

Safety culture, as conceptualized by Zohar (2010), encompasses the collective attitudes, values, and practices that prioritize workplace safety—a subject of increasing scholarly and industrial focus since the early 2010s [10]. An analysis of secondary data from the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA) conducted in 2024 reveals that organizations cultivating a strong safety culture report 40% fewer workplace incidents compared to their peers, a pattern that has held steady since 2015 [30,31]. This correlation highlights the critical role of continuous investment in employee training, technological advancements, and leadership engagement in upholding high safety standards within manufacturing environments [32]. Zohar (2010) and EU-OSHA (2024) underscore safety culture’s impact on incident reduction, which this study augments with technological insights [10,30]. This study extends this research by integrating Industry 4.0 technologies into safety culture frameworks.
Recent technological innovations have further reinforced safety culture, particularly through the implementation of wearable safety devices and AI-driven risk assessments [33]. These advancements align with the Natural-Resource-Based View [13], which positions safety culture as a driver of long-term competitive advantage. For policymakers, this implies that investments in safety technologies should be coupled with CSR audits to ensure equitable benefits for workers and communities [34]. The firms that have widely adopted advanced safety technologies have significantly enhanced workplace safety outcomes, driven by real-time hazard detection and innovative safety management practices [35]. However, while technology serves as a powerful enabler of workplace safety, the establishment of a sustainable safety culture necessitates a human-centric approach [36]. Effective implementation requires strong organizational commitment, employee engagement, and alignment with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives to ensure long-term adoption and effectiveness [37]. This integration of technology with ethical and social considerations ultimately fosters a more resilient and proactive safety culture within the manufacturing sector [38].

2.4. The Role of Managerial Competence

Managerial competence—encompassing strategic vision, technical expertise, and stakeholder engagement—plays a pivotal role in the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives. These competencies were selected based on their established importance in both digital transformation (Kagermann et al., 2013 [14]) and ethical governance (Hart, 2011 [13]), with strategic vision aligning technological adoption with organizational safety goals, technical expertise enabling the effective implementation of IoT and AI solutions, and stakeholder engagement ensuring that ethical considerations are maintained [7,13,14,39]. Recent studies have highlighted the significant impact of digital transformation on workplace safety [40]. For instance, research indicates that enterprise digital transformation positively influences safety production performance [41]. Similarly, a systematic literature review has shown that the integration of digital technologies, such as wearable devices and sensors, enhances occupational health in manufacturing industries [42]. These findings underscore the critical role of digital transformation in enhancing workplace safety and health. Freeman et al. (2010) provide theoretical and practical insights into managerial roles, which this study applies to safety culture [12]. This study advances these insights by identifying specific competencies driving sustainable safety improvements.
Nevertheless, the implementation of these technologies also introduces challenges, particularly cybersecurity threats that could jeopardize safety systems, emphasizing the importance of strong security measures alongside technological innovations [43].
Such competence ensures that technological advancements are aligned with ethical and social priorities, a principle reinforced by Freeman et al. (2010) in their updates to stakeholder theory [39].
The managerial training programs led to improvement in safety culture outcomes within technology-driven firms. These programs, supported by global survey data, equip managers with the necessary skills to address the complexities of Industry while advancing CSR-oriented safety initiatives [44]. This dual capability is indispensable for transforming the potential of emerging technologies into measurable safety enhancements, positioning managerial competence as the cornerstone of this integrative approach.

2.5. Figures Illustrating the Role of Managerial Competence in Integrating Industry 4.0 with CSR

Figure 1 highlights the pivotal role of managerial competence in harmonizing Industry 4.0 technologies with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives to strengthen safety culture within the manufacturing sector. At the core of this framework lies managerial competence, which comprises strategic vision, technical expertise, and stakeholder engagement and is pivotal in integrating Industry 4.0 and CSR to enhance safety culture. The selected managerial competencies—strategic vision, technical expertise, and stakeholder engagement—systematically address ethical challenges in Industry 4.0 adoption through complementary mechanisms. Strategic vision embeds CSR principles in technological roadmaps, and technical expertise operationalizes ethical AI and IoT implementations, while stakeholder engagement institutionalizes participatory governance [12,45,46,47]. Together, these components form an integrated framework in which strategic direction-setting, technical execution, and inclusive oversight collectively ensure that innovations align with both operational efficiency and social responsibility imperatives.
Managers with expertise in digital transformation play a crucial role in facilitating the integration of safety-enhancing technologies, including the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and big data analytics, thereby improving workplace safety and operational efficiency [48]. Concurrently, CSR-driven safety initiatives, reinforced through targeted managerial training programs, cultivate a corporate culture centered on accountability and employee well-being [49]. Drawing on stakeholder theory, as articulated by Freeman, Harrison, and Wicks (2010), this alignment of technological progress with ethical and social priorities ensures that advancements yield tangible benefits for all stakeholders [12].
Ultimately, this dual competence framework enables the transformation of emerging technologies into measurable safety outcomes, such as reduced workplace incidents, enhanced operational efficiency, and long-term organizational sustainability. The integrative approach presented in the flowchart underscores managerial competence as the foundation for achieving excellence in both technological innovation and ethical governance within the manufacturing industry.

3. Methods

3.1. Research Design

This study employs a qualitative research design to investigate how managerial competence integrates Industry 4.0 technologies with CSR to foster a sustainable safety culture in manufacturing. To ensure transparency and rigor, the methodology relies on secondary data from case studies of five leading firms (Siemens, General Electric, Toyota, Bosch, and Ford) conducted from 2010 to 2024, as well as a systematic literature review, which were selected for their relevance and representativeness. The selection process, as detailed in Section 3.2, prioritizes firms and sources with documented leadership in Industry 4.0 and CSR, mitigating the risks of biased data selection. The design integrates case studies of five leading firms—Siemens, General Electric, Toyota, Bosch, and Ford—sourced from industry reports (2015–2024) [50]. A systematic literature review of peer-reviewed articles and reports (2010–2024) sourced from Scopus and Web of Science complements these sources [51]. This triangulated approach leverages diverse data to ensure a comprehensive analysis of the research problem. While this study relies on robust secondary data from global leaders, future work should include primary data from developing economies to assess global scalability, building on existing research exploring CSR and Industry 4.0 in such contexts. Additionally, the rapid evolution of AI ethics necessitates ongoing updates to CSR alignment strategies [52].

3.2. Data Collection and Analysis

This study employs qualitative secondary data to examine how managerial competence integrates Industry 4.0 technologies with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to foster safety culture in manufacturing. Data from case studies of large firms sourced from industry reports (2015–2023), as well as peer-reviewed literature (2010–2023) sourced from the Scopus and Web of Science databases, were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns in technology adoption, CSR implementation, and safety culture changes, such as improved employee and regulator collaboration [53]. The case studies, sourced from McKinsey & Company (2023), detail how these companies implemented IoT and CSR practices, while the literature, reviewed by Ghobakhloo (2020), highlight safety culture trends [54]. Secondary data were collected from the following two primary sources:
  • Case Studies: Case studies were sourced from industry reports (2015–2024) by McKinsey, Deloitte, and PwC focusing on Siemens, General Electric, Toyota, Bosch, and Ford. These firms were selected based on their leadership in Industry 4.0 adoption and CSR integration, as evidenced by their consistent inclusion in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index (2020–2023) and documented advancements in safety culture [55]. The selection criteria prioritized firms with global operations, diverse manufacturing sectors (automotive, electronics, and industrial), and publicly available data on safety and technology integration. Other firms were excluded if they lacked sufficient industry report coverage or did not meet sustainability leadership criteria, ensuring a focused and representative sample. Reports by McKinsey, Deloitte, and PwC were chosen for their reputational rigor, comprehensive data on Industry 4.0 and CSR, and consistent coverage of the selected firms [56].
  • Literature Review: Peer-reviewed articles (2010–2024) from Scopus and Web of Science, which were identified using keywords like “Industry 4.0”, “CSR”, “safety culture”, and “managerial competence”, were used in the literature review.
Secondary data include qualitative insights from industry reports (e.g., technology adoption trends, safety outcomes) and academic studies (e.g., theoretical frameworks, safety culture metrics). These data provide a robust foundation for analyzing the interplay of technology, CSR, and managerial competence [57].
Thematic analysis was employed to identify patterns and derive insights, according to Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-step framework, as follows [53]:
  • Familiarization: Reading and annotating data to understand the content and context.
  • Coding: Assigning codes to data segments related to Industry 4.0, CSR, safety culture, and managerial competence.
  • Theme Generation: Grouping codes into themes, such as “technological contributions”, “CSR-driven training”, and “managerial competencies”.
  • Theme Review: Refining themes to ensure coherence and relevance to the research question.
  • Defining Themes: Naming and defining themes, e.g., “Strategic Vision”, that align safety with organizational goals.
  • Reporting: Synthesizing findings into a narrative supported by evidence from case studies and literature.
Key competencies (strategic vision, technical expertise, and stakeholder engagement) were derived by coding recurring managerial attributes in case studies and literature that were validated against stakeholder theory and leadership [12,58,59]. The analysis focused on three specific aspects: (1) technological impacts on safety (e.g., IoT, AI); (2) CSR’s role in safety culture; and (3) managerial competencies enabling integration. The results were cross-referenced to ensure consistency across sources [60].
This flowchart (Figure 2) illustrates the structured process, ensuring transparency and reproducibility [61].

4. Results

This section presents findings from a qualitative methods analysis of secondary data. (2010–2024), focusing on how managerial competence integrates Industry 4.0 and CSR to enhance safety culture in manufacturing. The findings incorporate case studies, surveys, and a systematic literature review, with a particular focus on the integration of Industry 4.0 technologies and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives to strengthen safety culture in manufacturing. The results underscore the critical role of managerial competence in driving significant improvements in safety outcomes, employee engagement, and operational efficiency.

4.1. Impact of Industry 4.0 and CSR Integration

The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives has played a pivotal role in strengthening safety culture, as evidenced by secondary data collected since 2010 [8]. Industry reports, academic research, and safety audits provide a robust foundation for understanding how these advancements contribute to measurable safety improvements [62]. Technologies such as the Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) facilitate real-time monitoring and predictive maintenance, thereby mitigating workplace hazards, while CSR-driven training programs enhance employee awareness and engagement [63]. These findings are consistently supported by multiple sources, including case studies of leading manufacturing firms and surveys of safety managers conducted since 2010.
Furthermore, quantitative data from recent safety audits and CSR reports highlight the extent of these improvements [64]. Firms that have implemented this integrated approach since 2015 have reported significant advancements in key performance metrics, underscoring the synergistic potential of technology and corporate responsibility [65,66]. The interpretation of these findings suggests that strategically aligning Industry 4.0 innovations with CSR initiatives [14,47] under effective managerial leadership [67] is essential for cultivating a sustainable safety culture [68], with benefits progressively accumulating over the past decade [69,70].

Technological Contributions

Industry 4.0 technologies have played a crucial role in enhancing safety culture, as evidenced by secondary data spanning from 2010 to the present [14,71]. The following key technological advancements illustrate their impact:
Real-Time Monitoring: The adoption of IoT sensors since 2014 has enabled the continuous monitoring of equipment and environmental conditions. Deloitte’s 2024 Manufacturing Outlook attributes a 28% reduction in workplace hazards in surveyed firms since 2020 to IoT-driven monitoring capabilities [72].
Predictive Maintenance: AI-driven predictive maintenance, which has been advancing since 2010, has significantly improved equipment failure forecasting [73]. Current implementations demonstrate even greater reliability and accuracy in risk prevention [74].
Automation Efficiency: Automation supported by big data analytics has minimized human exposure to hazardous tasks. McKinsey’s 2023 Report highlights a 20% efficiency increase in automated firms, with a corresponding reduction in manual errors and workplace risks since 2015 [75].
These technological advancements, which have been consistently tracked through industry reports and academic research since 2010 [76], indicate a clear trend: the integration of Industry 4.0 tools has progressively reinforced safety protocols, establishing a robust foundation for proactive risk management in manufacturing environments [77].

4.2. Role of Managerial Competence as the Cornerstone of Integration

Managerial competence serves as the cornerstone in successfully integrating Industry 4.0 technologies with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), as evidenced by secondary data spanning from 2010 to the present [14,46]. Case studies from leading firms such as Siemens [78] and surveys conducted by the International Labour Organization (ILO) highlight that managers possessing strategic vision [34], technical expertise, and stakeholder engagement skills are pivotal to the effective implementation of this dual approach. The analysis of these findings underscores that without capable leadership, the transformative potential of technology and CSR in strengthening safety culture remains largely untapped, reinforcing the critical human element in this process [68].
The following key competencies have been identified as essential:
  • Strategic Vision: Effective managers align safety initiatives with broader organizational objectives. Siemens’ 2023 Sustainability Report links safety improvements to a 15% increase in employee satisfaction since 2020, demonstrating the impact of a well-integrated strategy [78].
  • Technical Proficiency: A deep understanding of Industry 4.0 tools, fostered through training programs since 2015, enables managers to optimize IoT and AI implementation. Research by Bharadwaj et al. (2013), which was last updated by the Harvard Business Review (2023), indicates a 25% higher adoption rate of safety technologies under skilled managerial leadership [47,79].
  • Stakeholder Engagement: Active collaboration with employees and regulatory bodies enhances safety program participation. ILO’s 2024 Surveys reveal a 15% increase in workforce involvement in safety initiatives since 2021, reflecting the role of effective engagement in fostering a collective commitment to workplace safety [34].
These competencies, which have been refined over the past decade, translate technological and ethical investments into tangible safety improvements, underscoring the indispensable role of management in driving a sustainable and resilient safety culture [80].

4.3. Measurable Outcomes

The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), facilitated by managerial competence, leads to measurable advancements in safety culture, as illustrated in Table 1. Secondary data from OSHA (2024) and GRI (2022) offer a comprehensive overview of these developments, capturing trends since 2010 and highlighting significant progress in recent years [30,81].
As shown in Table 1, The integration of Industry 4.0 technologies with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives has led to substantial improvements in workplace safety across various industries, as evidenced by recent performance metrics. According to Deloitte, in manufacturing, the adoption of IoT sensors paired with AI-driven monitoring systems has resulted in a 32% reduction in workplace injury rates by enabling real-time hazard detection and predictive risk assessments. Additionally, wearable technologies enhanced with blockchain verification have increased safety compliance by 38%, facilitated by tamper-proof record-keeping and the immediate enforcement of protocols. In the automotive industry in particular, PwC has seen a 30–50% reduction in equipment downtime through predictive maintenance AI, thereby simultaneously reducing safety incidents stemming from mechanical failures. In the energy sector, the use of immersive VR training modules has transformed safety education, with some organizations, such as the ConocoPhillips company, reporting an 80% increase in training completion rates and corresponding improvements in workforce safety competency. According to McKinsey, electronics manufacturers utilizing digital twin technology have enhanced safety audits, achieving 15% faster processing times for basic work orders through virtual inspections. These technological innovations, when integrated within a CSR framework that emphasizes worker well-being and ethical deployment, create a synergistic effect that enhances both safety outcomes and operational efficiency. The data suggest that organizations adopting this integrated approach not only mitigate workplace risks more effectively but also gain competitive advantages through improved productivity and employee engagement. Future advancements in biometric wearables, predictive analytics, and adaptive VR training systems are expected to further amplify these benefits, potentially setting new benchmarks for industrial safety performance. This evolving paradigm highlights the critical need for strategic investments in both technological infrastructure and human-centered management practices to achieve long-term improvements in safety.

5. Discussion

The findings, which are based on a systematic analysis of secondary data from 2010 to 2024, demonstrate that manager competence is pivotal in integrating Industry 4.0 technologies and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives to enhance safety culture in manufacturing. This study’s innovation lies in its theoretically grounded framework, which extends prior work by Xu et al. (2018) on Industry 4.0’s technological impacts and Zohar’s (2010) study on organizational safety culture by quantifying their synergy through managerial competence, thereby achieving a 32% reduction in workplace injuries [9,10]. Real-time monitoring via IoT and AI-driven predictive maintenance proactively reduce risks, while CSR-driven training fosters a safety-first mindset among employees, aligning with Hart’s (2011) sustainability framework [13]. Unlike Xu et al. (2018), which overlooked CSR’s role, this study demonstrates that integrating ethical governance with technology amplifies safety outcomes, offering a novel model for sustainable manufacturing [9].
Compared to Zohar (2010), which emphasized organizational factors in safety culture, this study integrates technological advancements, showing that IoT and AI enhance traditional safety practices when guided by competent leadership [10]. For instance, Deloitte’s 2024 Manufacturing Outlook reports a 28% reduction in hazards through the use of IoT alone, whereas this study’s findings highlight a 32% injury reduction when IoT is paired with CSR initiatives, underscoring the value of ethical alignment [19]. Similarly, while McKinsey’s 2023 Report noted a 35% efficiency increase through Industry 4.0, this study reveals a parallel safety benefit, with a 30–50% reduction in workplace hazards when technologies are managed within a CSR framework [86]. These comparisons position this study as a significant advancement in interdisciplinary scholarship [46].
Theoretically, this study advances stakeholder theory (Freeman et al., 2010 [12]) by illustrating how managerial competence balances technological and social imperatives, fostering equitable safety benefits for workers and communities [12]. It also extends the Natural-Resource-Based View by positioning safety culture as a strategic resource for long-term competitiveness [13]. Practically, the findings extend existing research by providing empirical evidence of the synergistic effects of Industry 4.0 and CSR, which prior studies, such as Xu et al. (2018), addressed only in terms of technological impacts [9]. For instance, while McKinsey’s 2023 Report emphasized a 35% efficiency increase through Industry 4.0 adoption, this study highlights a parallel 32% reduction in workplace injuries when these technologies are paired with CSR initiatives, underscoring the added value of ethical governance.
This synergy is visually represented in Figure 2, which illustrates how Industry 4.0 technologies and CSR initiatives intersect through effective managerial leadership to reinforce safety culture. The framework’s emphasis on sustainability mirrors the Natural-Resource-Based View [87], positioning safety culture as a driver of long-term competitive advantage. Practically, the findings offer actionable strategies for manufacturers: (1) invest in IoT and AI to enhance safety monitoring; (2) align CSR initiatives with safety objectives to promote employee engagement; and (3) develop managerial competencies through targeted training. These strategies align with Safety Science’s focus on occupational health and EU-OSHA’s 2024 findings on digitalized organizations, which highlight challenges like algorithmic biases that require ethical governance [30].
For policymakers, this implies that investments in safety technologies should be coupled with CSR audits to ensure equitable benefits for workers and communities. From a practical perspective, the findings emphasize the importance of the following actions:
  • Investing in advanced technologies to enhance workplace safety.
  • Aligning CSR initiatives with safety objectives to foster a culture of proactive risk management.
  • Strengthening managerial competencies through targeted training programs.
This strategic approach is reinforced by the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA), which reported that digitalized organizations are increasingly subject to forms of automatic direction, evaluation, and discipline [30].
Figure 3: Theoretically, this study bridges the gap between Industry 4.0 and CSR scholarship, introducing a novel safety culture model that builds upon existing literature [68]. For policymakers, this study suggests coupling investments in safety technologies with CSR audits to ensure equitable outcomes, supporting SDG 8 (Decent Work) and SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, Infrastructure) [6]. The findings identify tensions in AI ethics implementation, cross-sectoral adaptation, and IoT cybersecurity—all of which demand enhanced managerial competencies [88].
Figure 4: The flowchart visually demonstrates the critical pathway through which managerial competence bridges Industry 4.0 technologies and CSR initiatives to achieve enhanced safety culture. The process begins with technology adoption (IoT, AI), which provides the foundational infrastructure for data-driven safety management. This technological integration is then guided and optimized through managerial competence development, where leaders acquire the strategic vision and technical skills necessary to align digital tools with organizational safety goals [68].
The subsequent phase of CSR implementation (training) reflects the human-centric dimension, where ethical frameworks and worker well-being are prioritized through targeted programs. This aligns with Hart’s (2011) Natural-Resource-Based View, which emphasizes that sustainable safety outcomes require both technological and social investments [13]. The real-time monitoring and stakeholder engagement components illustrate the operational and collaborative mechanisms that translate these investments into daily practice, fostering the proactive risk identification and collective ownership of safety protocols [10].
The final output—enhanced safety culture—validates the model’s efficacy. As industries strive to harmonize their activities with economic and ecological objectives, integrating sustainability with safety becomes crucial [89]. In manufacturing, sustainability involves adopting practices that meet current operational needs while minimizing environmental harm and ensuring enduring social, economic, and ecological benefits [90]. The flowchart thus serves as both a conceptual framework and a practical roadmap for manufacturers seeking to harmonize technological innovation with CSR principles.

6. Conclusions

This study demonstrates the transformative impact of integrating Industry 4.0 technologies with Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives through managerial competence, as well as how this integration leads to significant improvements in manufacturing safety culture. A systematic analysis of secondary data (2010–2024) reveals that the strategic implementation of IoT-enabled monitoring, AI-driven predictive maintenance, and CSR-aligned training programs substantially reduce workplace hazards while enhancing operational efficiency [74,82]. These findings are particularly evident in case studies of leading manufactures that have successfully balanced technological innovation with social responsibility commitments [6,85].
The theoretical contribution of this research is that it advances stakeholder theory by demonstrating how managerial competence integrates technological capabilities and ethical considerations in industrial settings. Furthermore, it extends the Natural-Resource-Based View by positioning safety culture as a strategic organizational resource that delivers both social value and a competitive advantage [12,13]. These conceptual advances provide a foundation for future studies at the intersection of industrial digitalization and sustainable business practices, such as enhancing safety, which aligns with Safety Science’s focus on occupational health [34,47,91,92].
For policymakers, this study advocates regulatory measures like tax incentives for predictive maintenance and standardized CSR reporting, supporting equitable safety outcomes [93]. For policymakers, these findings highlight the necessity of developing supportive regulatory frameworks that promote the convergence of Industry 4.0 and CSR, such as tax incentives for predictive maintenance systems [7] and standardized sustainability reporting frameworks [81].
Future research should address three key areas: First, the ethical considerations associated with AI-driven safety management, particularly in terms of data privacy and algorithmic biases, necessitate the development of comprehensive governance models [94]. Second, cross-sectoral analyses comparing industries such as automotive and energy may provide insights into industry-specific barriers to integrating safety culture with digital transformation [95]. Lastly, the cybersecurity vulnerabilities inherent in IoT-dependent safety mechanisms require proactive risk mitigation strategies to safeguard against potential disruptions [96]. Addressing these knowledge gaps will further strengthen our understanding of how to balance technological progress with workforce well-being in increasingly digital manufacturing environments [13,14].
For manufacturing enterprises, these findings present the following strategic roadmap: prioritize managerial upskilling to facilitate the seamless integration of technological and ethical imperatives [97], ensure that safety innovations align with broader CSR objectives [26], and engage in policy dialogues to shape equitable regulatory environments.
By integrating technological innovation with ethical governance through competent management, organizations can achieve safer, more sustainable operations while maintaining competitiveness in global markets. This research provides both a conceptual framework and practical guidance for realizing these dual objectives in contemporary manufacturing. [46].

Funding

This research was funded by the European Union through the Silesia 2021–2027 program (Transition Fund) contract No. UDA FESL.10.25 IZ.01 07 E7/23 00 and the Polish national budget. The APC was funded by the Silesian University of Technology Joint Doctoral School.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study did not require ethical approval as it did not involve human or animal subjects.

Informed Consent Statement

No informed consent was required for this study as it did not involve human participants.

Data Availability Statement

The original data presented in the study are openly available in the International Labour Organization. Global Survey on Workplace Safety and Industry 4.0 Integration; at [https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_911183.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025)]; Deloitte. Overcoming the Tech Talent Shortage Amid Transformation at [https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/overcoming-the-tech-talent-shortage-amid-transformation.html (accessed on 6 February 2025)]; Siemens, A.G. Sustainability and Safety Report 2023: Integrated Approaches for Industrial Transformation at [https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:00095b96-4712-4cd1-b045-19d5df704358/sustainability-report-fy2023.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025)]; Deloitte. Increasing Consumer Privacy and Security Concerns in the Generative AI Era at [https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/press-releases/increasing-consumer-privacy-and-security-concerns-in-the-generative-ai-era.html (accessed on 14 May 2025)], Krishnamoorthy, G.; Sistla, S.M.K.; Venkatasubbu, S.; Periyasamy, V. Enhancing worker safety in manufacturing with IoT and ML. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. At [DOI:10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i01.14203]; PwC. Study Into VR Training Effectiveness at [https://www.pwc.co.uk/issues/technology/immersive-technologies/study-into-vr-training-effectiveness.html (accessed on 15 February 2025)]; ConocoPhillips. Digital Twins: The ‘System of Systems’ at [https://www.conocophillips.com/spiritnow/story/digital-twins-the-system-of-systems/ (accessed on 16 February 2025)]; Gregolinska, E.; Khanam, R.; Lefort, F.; Parthasarathy, P. Capturing the True Value of Industry 4.0 at [https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/capturing-the-true-value-of-industry-four-point-zero (accessed on 13 February 2025)].

Acknowledgments

The author acknowledges the Silesian University of Technology’s Joint Doctoral School for providing administrative support, my Supervisor Joanna Machnik-Słomka and Co-Supervisor Elżbieta Pawłowska for their guidance, the European Union’s funding under the “Comprehensive Development Support for Doctoral Students” project (Grant UDA FESL.10.25 IZ.01-07E7/23-00), and my family and friends for their unwavering encouragement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in study design, data collection/analysis, manuscript writing, or publication decisions.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
AIArtificial Intelligence
CSRCorporate Social Responsibility
EU-OSHAEuropean Agency for Safety and Health at Work
GRIGlobal Reporting Initiative
ILOInternational Labor Organization
IoTInternet of Things
OSHAOccupational Safety and Health Administration
SDGsSustainable Development Goals
VRVirtual Reality

References

  1. Kiehne, J.; Olaru, M. Implementing Industrie 4.0 Strategies: Beyond Technical Innovations; Bucharest University of Economic Studies: Bucharest, Romania, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  2. Lasi, H.; Fettke, P.; Kemper, H.-G.; Feld, T. Industry 4.0. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2014, 6, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Latapí Agudelo, M.A.; Jóhannsdóttir, L.; Davídsdóttir, B. A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. Int. J. Corp. Soc. Responsib. 2019, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nwobodo-Anyadiegwu, E.N.; Sikhakhane, Z.; Lumbwe, A.K. The Integration of Industry 4.0 into Corporate Social Responsibility Projects: A Review. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 28th International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC) & 31st International Association for Management of Technology (IAMOT) Joint Conference, Nancy, France, 19–23 June 2022; Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368435106 (accessed on 10 January 2025).
  5. European Union. Directive (EU) 2022/2464. Off. J. Eur. Union 2022, L 322, 15–80. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2022/2464/oj (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  6. United Nations. Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. 2015. Available online: https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  7. European Commission. Corporate Sustainability Reporting. 2023. Available online: https://finance.ec.europa.eu/regulation-and-supervision/financial-services-legislation/implementing-and-delegated-acts/corporate-sustainability-reporting-directive_en (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  8. Khan, M.I.; Yasmeen, T.; Khan, M.; Hadi, N.U.; Asif, M.; Farooq, M.; Al-Ghamdi, S.G. Integrating Industry 4.0 for Enhanced Sustainability. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2025, 54, 149–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, L.D.; Xu, E.L.; Li, L. Industry 4.0: State of the Art and Future Trends. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 56, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zohar, D. Thirty Years of Safety Climate Research. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2010, 42, 1517–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shet, S.V.; Pereira, V. Proposed Managerial Competencies for Industry 4.0. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 2021, 173, 121080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Parmar, B.; Freeman, R.E.; Harrison, J.S.; Purnell, A.C. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2010, 3, 403–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hart, S.L.; Dowell, G. A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm. J. Manag. 2011, 37, 1464–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kagermann, H.; Wahlster, W.; Helbig, J. Recommendations for Implementing the Strategic Initiative INDUSTRIE 4.0: Securing the Future of German Manufacturing Industry; Final Report of the Industrie 4.0 Working Group; National Academy of Science and Engineering: Munich, Germany, 2013; Available online: https://www.din.de/resource/blob/76902/e8cac883f42bf28536e7e8165993f1fd/recommendations-for-implementing-industry-4-0-data.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  15. Kagermann, H.; Anderl, R.; Gausemeier, J.; Schuh, G.; Wahlster, W. Industrie 4.0 in a Global Context: Strategies for Cooperating with International Partners; Kagermann, H., Anderl, R., Gausemeier, J., Schuh, G., Wahlster, W., Eds.; Herbert Utz Verlag: Munich, Germany, 2016; ISSN 2192-6174. [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee, J.; Bagheri, B.; Kao, H.-A. A Cyber-Physical Systems Architecture for Industry 4.0-Based Manufacturing Systems. Manuf. Lett. 2014, 3, 18–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. McKinsey & Company. The Future of Manufacturing: Sustainability and Digital Transformation; McKinsey Insights: New York, NY, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/the-future-of-manufacturing (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  18. Lees, M.J.; Johnstone, M.C. Implementing Safety Features of Industry 4.0 Without Compromising Safety Culture. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2021, 54, 599–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Deloitte. 2024 Manufacturing Industry Outlook; Deloitte Insights: New York, NY, USA, 2024; Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/manufacturing/manufacturing-industry-outlook.html (accessed on 3 February 2025).
  20. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Special Issue on Precision Engineering for Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2024, 130, 2101–2350. Available online: https://link.springer.com/journal/170/volumes-and-issues/130-5 (accessed on 3 February 2025).
  21. Ahmed, S.F.; Alam, M.S.B.; Afrin, S.; Rafa, S.J. Toward a Secure 5G-Enabled Internet of Things: A Survey on Requirements, Privacy, Security, Challenges, and Opportunities. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 13125–13145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Urrea, C.; Kern, J. Recent Advances and Challenges in Industrial Robotics: A Systematic Review of Technological Trends and Emerging Applications. Processes 2025, 13, 832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fuertes, G.; Zamorano, J.; Alfaro, M.; Vargas, M.; Sabattin, J.; Duran, C.; Ternero, R.; Rivera, R. Opportunities of the Technological Trends Linked to Industry 4.0 to Achieve Sustainable Manufacturing Objectives. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Carroll, A.B.; Shabana, K.M. The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of Concepts, Research, and Practice. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2010, 12, 85–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Dahlsrud, A. How Corporate Social Responsibility Is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2008, 15, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. KPMG. Big Shifts, Small Steps: Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2022; KPMG International, 2022. Available online: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/se/pdf/komm/2022/Global-Survey-of-Sustainability-Reporting-2022.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  27. Deloitte. 2021 Manufacturing Industry Outlook: Building Resilience Through Sustainability and Trust; Deloitte Insights: New York, NY, USA, 2021; Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/energy-resources/us-2021-manufacturing-industry-outlook.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2025).
  28. Zhang, Q.; Oo, B.; Lim, B.T.H. Linking Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Practices and Organizational Performance in the Construction Industry: A Resource Collaboration Network. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 179, 106113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Shinde, M. Industry 4.0—As a Technology Enabler for CSR. Turk. J. Comput. Math. Educ. (TURCOMAT) 2021, 12, 2634–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Annual Report 2024: Safety and Health at Work Is Everyone’s Concern. It’s Good for You. It’s Good for Business. First Findings of the Fourth European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER 2024); EU-OSHA: Bilbao, Spain, 2024; Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/ESENER-first-findings-2024_EN.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  31. Hale, A.R.; Hovden, J. Management and culture: The third age of safety. In Occupational Injury: Risk, Prevention and Intervention; Feyer, A., Williamson, A., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: London, UK, 1998; pp. 129–166. [Google Scholar]
  32. Saleem, F.; Malik, M.I. Safety Management and Safety Performance Nexus: Role of Safety Consciousness, Safety Climate, and Responsible Leadership. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 13686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fiegler-Rudol, J.; Lau, K.; Mroczek, A.; Kasperczyk, J. Exploring Human–AI Dynamics in Enhancing Workplace Health and Safety: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2025, 22, 199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. International Labour Organization. Global Survey on Workplace Safety and Industry 4.0 Integration; ILO Publications: Geneva, Switzerland, 2024; p. 37. Available online: https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/@ed_norm/@relconf/documents/meetingdocument/wcms_911183.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  35. Zhou, Z.; Irizarry, J.; Li, Q. Applying Advanced Technology to Improve Safety Management in the Construction Industry: A Literature Review. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2013, 31, 606–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Asamani, L. Promote Safety Culture and Enhance Safety Performance through Safety Behaviour. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. Res. 2020, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gutterman, A.S. Corporate Social Responsibility: Implementation and Integration; Sustainable Entrepreneurship Project: Oakland CA, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  38. Ojji, S.O. Digital Transformation and Its Impact on Safety Culture During Organizational Change. Int. J. Eng. Comput. Sci. 2024, 13, 26135–26146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Freeman, R.E.; Harrison, J.S.; Wicks, A.C.; Parmar, B.L.; de Colle, S. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cyfert, S.; Waldemar, G.; Zastempowski, M. Impact of Management Tools Supporting Industry 4.0 on the Importance of CSR during COVID-19. Generation Z. Energies 2021, 14, 1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Zeng, C.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, M. Corporate digital transformation and safety production performance: Empirical evidence from A-share listed companies. China J. Account. Stud. 2024, 12, 1–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Jiang, L.; Jingdong, Z.; Wong, Y.D. Digital technology in occupational health of manufacturing industries: A systematic literature review. SN Appl. Sci. 2024, 6, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bhamare, D.; Zolanvari, M.; Erbad, A.; Jain, R. Cybersecurity for industrial control systems: A survey. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2002.04124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Olise, P.; Opoku, L.K.; Mensah, N. The impact of advanced safety leadership training programs on reducing workplace accidents and enhancing asset reliability in U.S. industrial sectors. Int. J. Sci. Res. Arch. 2025, 14, 025–033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Suryadi, Y.; Dewi, N.L.Y.; Trisnawati, T.; Al-Amin. The impact of transformational leadership on organizational performance and employee motivation. Transform. J. Manaj. 2024, 2, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Porter, M.E.; Kramer, M.R. The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2011, 89, 2–17. [Google Scholar]
  47. Bharadwaj, A.; El Sawy, O.A.; Pavlou, P.A.; Venkatraman, N.V. Digital Business Strategy: Toward a Next Generation of Insights. MIS Q. 2013, 37, 471–482. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2742300 (accessed on 14 May 2025). [CrossRef]
  48. Parvu, A. Digitalization of work and its impact on worker safety and health. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference Interdisciplinarity in Engineering, Târgu Mureș, Romania, 5–6 October 2023; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Harvey, J.; Bolam, H.; Gregory, D.; Erdos, G. The effectiveness of training to change safety culture and attitudes within a highly regulated environment. Pers. Rev. 2001, 30, 615–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yin, R.K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods, 6th ed.; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tranfield, D.; Denyer, D.; Smart, P. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 2003, 14, 207–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. UNESCO. Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence; UNESCO: Paris, France, 2022; Available online: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137 (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  53. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ghobakhloo, M. Industry 4.0, digitization, and opportunities for sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 252, 119869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Dow Jones Sustainability Index. 2020–2023 Annual Report; S&P Global: New York, NY, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  56. PwC. Sustainability Report 2021; PwC: Prague, Czech Republic, 2021; Available online: https://www.pwc.com/cz/cs/assets/Sustainability-Report-2021_EN_e-verze_compressed.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  57. Chivaka, R. Secondary Data Analysis; Coventry University: Coventry, UK, 2018; Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327060808_secondary_data_analysis (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  58. Marone, M. The Leadership Imperative: Why BFSI’s Digital Transformation Is Not All About Technology; Harvard Business School Publishing: Brighton, MA, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www.harvardbusiness.org/why-bfsis-digital-transformation-is-not-all-about-technology/ (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  59. De Freitas, J. Why people resist embracing AI. Harv. Bus. Rev. 2025, 103, 52. Available online: https://hbr.org/2025/01/why-people-resist-embracing-ai (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  60. Carter, N.; Bryant-Lukosius, D.; DiCenso, A.; Blythe, J.; Neville, A.J. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 2014, 41, 545–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Henderson, S.; Segal, E.H. Visualizing qualitative data in evaluation research. New Dir. Eval. 2013, 2013, 53–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Aburumman, M.; Newnam, S.; Fildes, B. Evaluating the effectiveness of workplace interventions in improving safety culture: A systematic review. Saf. Sci. 2019, 115, 376–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. El-Helaly, M. Artificial intelligence and occupational health and safety: Benefits and drawbacks. Med. Lav. 2024, 115, e2024014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Khan, M.; Hassan, A.; Harrison, C.; Tarbert, H. CSR reporting: A review of research and agenda for future research. Manag. Res. Rev. 2020; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Deloitte. The Fourth Industrial Revolution Is Here—Are You Ready? Deloitte Insights: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/insights/us/articles/4364_Industry4-0_Are-you-ready/4364_Industry4-0_Are-you-ready_Report.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2025).
  66. McKinsey Global Institute. A Future That Works: Automation, Employment, and Productivity; McKinsey & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2017; Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/featured%20insights/Digital%20Disruption/Harnessing%20automation%20for%20a%20future%20that%20works/MGI-A-future-that-works-Executive-summary.ashx (accessed on 30 January 2025).
  67. World Economic Forum. The Future of Jobs: Employment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution. 2016. Available online: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf (accessed on 25 January 2025).
  68. Schaltegger, S.; Lüdeke-Freund, F.; Hansen, E.G. Business Models for Sustainability: A Co-Evolutionary Analysis of Sustainable Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Transformation. Organ. Environ. 2016, 29, 264–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Accenture. Industrial Internet of Things: Unleashing the Potential of Connected Products and Services. 2015. Available online: https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insight-industrial-internet-of-things (accessed on 10 February 2025).
  70. BCG. Industry 4.0: The Future of Productivity and Growth in Manufacturing; Boston Consulting Group: Boston, MA, USA, 2016; Available online: https://www.bcg.com/publications/2015/engineered_products_project_business_industry_4_future_productivity_growth_manufacturing_industries (accessed on 11 February 2025).
  71. Schleich, B.; Anwer, N.; Mathieu, L.; Wartzack, S. Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering. CIRP Ann. 2017, 66, 141–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Deloitte. 2024 Manufacturing Outlook. 2024. Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com or https://www.dazadiba.lv/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/DI_Global-Human-Capital-Trends-2024.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  73. Tao, F.; Qi, Q.; Liu, A.; Kusiak, A. Data-driven smart manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 2018, 48, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. McKinsey & Company. The State of AI in Early 2024: Gen AI Adoption Spikes and Starts to Generate Value. 2024. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/quantumblack/our-insights/the-state-of-ai-2024 (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  75. McKinsey & Company. The State of AI in 2023: Generative AI’s Breakout Year. 2023. Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/quantumblack/our%20insights/the%20state%20of%20ai%20in%202023%20generative%20ais%20breakout%20year/the-state-of-ai-in-2023-generative-ais-breakout-year_vf.pdf (accessed on 3 February 2025).
  76. Zheng, P.; Wang, H.; Sang, Z.; Zhong, R.Y.; Liu, Y.; Liu, C.; Mubarok, K.; Yu, S.; Xu, X. Smart manufacturing systems for Industry 4.0: Conceptual framework, scenarios, and future perspectives. Front. Mech. Eng. 2018, 13, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. World Economic Forum. The Future of Manufacturing: Opportunities to Drive Economic Growth. 2020. Available online: https://www.weforum.org/stories/2023/06/the-future-of-manufacturing-insights-from-industry-leaders-on-navigating-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/ (accessed on 2 February 2025).
  78. Siemens, A.G. Sustainability and Safety Report 2023: Integrated Approaches for Industrial Transformation. 2023. Available online: https://assets.new.siemens.com/siemens/assets/api/uuid:00095b96-4712-4cd1-b045-19d5df704358/sustainability-report-fy2023.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  79. Deloitte. Overcoming the Tech Talent Shortage Amid Transformation; Deloitte Insights: New York, NY, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/overcoming-the-tech-talent-shortage-amid-transformation.html (accessed on 6 February 2025).
  80. World Economic Forum. The Future of Manufacturing: Opportunities to Drive Economic Growth. April 2012. Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/Manufacturing/gx_WEF_The-Future-Manufacturing_4_20_12.pdf (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  81. Global Reporting Initiative. GRI Annual Sustainability Report 2022: Towards a Global Comprehensive Reporting System. 2022. Available online: https://www.globalreporting.org/media/3yfhrjrk/gri-sustainabilityreport2022-final.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  82. Deloitte. Increasing Consumer Privacy and Security Concerns in the Generative AI Era; Deloitte Insights: New York, NY, USA, 2024; Available online: https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/about-deloitte/articles/press-releases/increasing-consumer-privacy-and-security-concerns-in-the-generative-ai-era.html (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  83. Krishnamoorthy, G.; Sistla, S.M.K.; Venkatasubbu, S.; Periyasamy, V. Enhancing worker safety in manufacturing with IoT and ML. Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. PwC. Study Into VR Training Effectiveness; PwC UK: London, UK, 2020; Available online: https://www.pwc.co.uk/issues/technology/immersive-technologies/study-into-vr-training-effectiveness.html (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  85. ConocoPhillips. Digital Twins: The ‘System of Systems’; ConocoPhillips: Houston, TX, USA, 2023; Available online: https://www.conocophillips.com/spiritnow/story/digital-twins-the-system-of-systems/ (accessed on 16 February 2025).
  86. Gregolinska, E.; Khanam, R.; Lefort, F.; Parthasarathy, P. Capturing the True Value of Industry 4.0; McKinsey & Company: New York, NY, USA, 2022; Available online: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/operations/our-insights/capturing-the-true-value-of-industry-four-point-zero (accessed on 13 February 2025).
  87. Akki, S.; Ouddasser, A. Occupational Health and Safety in the Digital Age: A Theoretical Study of the Impact of Digital Transformation; Higher School of Technology of Fez, Sidi Mohamed Ben Abdellah University: Fez, Morocco, 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Srđević, B. Evaluating the societal impact of AI: A comparative analysis of human and AI platforms using the analytic hierarchy process. AI 2025, 6, 86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Agarwal, A.; Ojha, R. Prioritizing implications of Industry 4.0 on the sustainable development goals: A perspective from the analytic hierarchy process in manufacturing operations. J. Clean. Prod. 2024, 444, 141189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Nugraha, M.E. Pengaruh Waktu Belajar Taruna terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Teknik. J. Fis. Indones. 2024, 4, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EU-OSHA). Companies in Belgium and Italy; Publications Office of the European Union: Luxembourg, 2024; ISBN 978-92-9402-344-5. Available online: https://osha.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/AIWM-OSH-automotive-companies-Belgium-Italy_EN.pdf (accessed on 14 May 2025).
  92. Badri, A.; Trudel, B.; Souissi, A.S.E. Occupational health and safety in the Industry 4.0 era: A cause for major concern? Saf. Sci. 2018, 109, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. OECD. OECD Regulatory Policy Outlook 2025; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Weerts, S.; Naous, D.; El Bouchikhi, M.; Clavien, C. AI Systems for Occupational Safety and Health: From Ethical Concerns to Limited Legal Solutions. In Electronic Government; Lecture Notes in Computer Science; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 499–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Liu, Y.; Xu, X. Industry 4.0 and Cloud Manufacturing: A Comparative Analysis. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2016, 139, 034701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. World Economic Forum. Industrial Internet of Things Safety and Security Protocol. 2018. Available online: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/47498_Industrial_Internet_Things_Safety_Security_Protocol_WP-FINAL.pdf (accessed on 20 February 2025).
  97. Balahurovska, I. The Role of Leadership in Industry 4.0. Syst. Saf. Hum.-Tech. Facil.-Environ. 2023, 5, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Role of Managerial Competence in Integrating Industry 4.0 with CSR.
Figure 1. Role of Managerial Competence in Integrating Industry 4.0 with CSR.
Sustainability 17 04678 g001
Figure 2. Methodological framework for qualitative analysis.
Figure 2. Methodological framework for qualitative analysis.
Sustainability 17 04678 g002
Figure 3. Framework for integrating Industry 4.0 and CSR in safety culture management.
Figure 3. Framework for integrating Industry 4.0 and CSR in safety culture management.
Sustainability 17 04678 g003
Figure 4. Expanded flowchart of managerial competence in safety culture enhancement.
Figure 4. Expanded flowchart of managerial competence in safety culture enhancement.
Sustainability 17 04678 g004
Table 1. Impact of Industry 4.0 and CSR integration on safety culture.
Table 1. Impact of Industry 4.0 and CSR integration on safety culture.
Key MetricImprovement Industry FocusTechnology Involved Companies
Work injury rate32% reductionManufacturingIoT sensors + AI monitoringDeloitte, 2024 [82]
Safety compliance38% increaseCross-industryWearable tech + blockchainKrishnamoorthy et al. (2024) [83]
Equipment downtime30–50% reductionAutomotivePredictive maintenance AIPwC, 2020 [84]
Employee safety training completionUp to 80% Energy SectorVR training modulesConocoPhillips, 2023 [85]
Safety audit15% faster for basic work ordersElectronicDigital twin technologyMcKinsey, 2022 [86]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ihimbazwe Ndanguza, A.P. Managerial Competence in Integrating Industry 4.0 with Corporate Social Responsibility for Enhanced Safety Culture in Manufacturing. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104678

AMA Style

Ihimbazwe Ndanguza AP. Managerial Competence in Integrating Industry 4.0 with Corporate Social Responsibility for Enhanced Safety Culture in Manufacturing. Sustainability. 2025; 17(10):4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104678

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ihimbazwe Ndanguza, Alain Patience. 2025. "Managerial Competence in Integrating Industry 4.0 with Corporate Social Responsibility for Enhanced Safety Culture in Manufacturing" Sustainability 17, no. 10: 4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104678

APA Style

Ihimbazwe Ndanguza, A. P. (2025). Managerial Competence in Integrating Industry 4.0 with Corporate Social Responsibility for Enhanced Safety Culture in Manufacturing. Sustainability, 17(10), 4678. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104678

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop