Next Article in Journal
Effect of Cause-Related Marketing and Brand on Consumer Purchase Intention: Mediating Role of Emotions
Previous Article in Journal
Advancing Sustainable Medical Waste Management: A Case Study on Waste Generation and Classification in a University Hospital Microbiology Laboratory
Previous Article in Special Issue
Exploring the Impact of Span Length on Environmental Performance: A Comparative Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Material and Environmental Factors Impacting the Durability of Oak Mooring Piles in Venice, Italy

1
Faculty of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Biobased Structures and Materials, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CN Delft, The Netherlands
2
Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry, University of Padova (TESAF), 35020 Padova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Retired since Oct. 2024.
Sustainability 2025, 17(10), 4327; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104327
Submission received: 4 April 2025 / Revised: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 6 May 2025 / Published: 9 May 2025

Abstract

:
This study examines the rapid degradation of oak mooring piles caused by shipworms in Venice, Italy. In the last few decades, this problem has raised significant safety and environmental concerns, as the piles often need to be replaced every 18–24 months. The sound basic density and diameter of 22 oak piles were analysed after being exposed to shipworm attacks for 18–240 months to determine whether denser piles or larger diameters influence the rate of decay. This was performed to assess whether larger cross sections or higher densities of the piles could imply an increased durability against marine borers. The impact of environmental factors such as temperature, salinity, pH, and dissolved oxygen levels was also assessed. The results highlighted that pile density and diameter do not significantly influence the resistance against shipworms, while rising temperatures (+2 °C in the past two decades) may contribute to accelerating shipworm activity. These phenomena are worsened by the arrival of warm-water shipworms since 2013, exhibiting greater aggressiveness in wood degradation. Furthermore, the potential impact of storm surge barriers on shipworm activity remains an open research topic. Alternative materials and protection techniques introduced since 2015, such as polyurethane piles or metal stapling, face environmental and logistical challenges. Despite these alternatives, many new oak mooring piles are still installed in Venice without protection and are vulnerable to rapid deterioration. Addressing these issues requires multidisciplinary research to develop sustainable materials and preservation techniques for maintaining infrastructure in Venice.

1. Introduction

Many docking areas in the city of Venice (Italy) rely on wooden mooring piles, locally known as briccole (Figure 1), used for vessel mooring and navigation guidance [1]. The city of Venice adopts different wood species for mooring piles and protection systems for their durability [2]. The traditional wood species used for mooring piles in Venice, which are historically and architecturally significant to the city, mainly involved oak wood (Quercus robur and Quercus pubescens), chestnut (Castanea sativa), pine (Pinus spp.), and alder (Alnus spp.). Over the last decade, there has been an abnormal increase in marine wood-boring organisms attacking mooring piles, primarily Teredinidae species, which cause rapid deterioration of the wooden structure [1,3,4,5,6,7,8]. These phenomena are worsened by the arrival of warm-water shipworms (T. bartschi) [7], first detected in the Venice Lagoon in 2013. This species has demonstrated the ability to overwinter at near-freezing temperatures and exhibits greater aggressiveness in wood degradation. Now, invasive, warm-water shipworms have formed stable and abundant populations. In this context, Venice has faced emergency situations due to the sudden collapse of the mooring piles and problems related to their structural inefficiency due to material degradation. In many cases, the lifespan of the piles has decreased to just 18–24 months compared to the recorded average of 5–7 years between 2000 and 2010 [3,9] due to severe degradation caused by marine borers, commonly known as “shipworms” [1,6,7,10]. These molluscs tunnel through the wood, progressively weakening its structure and ultimately compromising the stability of the piles [10,11]. The rapid deterioration of more than fifty thousand mooring piles currently present in the Venice Lagoon has posed significant challenges for the maintenance and sustainability of Venice’s maritime infrastructure. The situation also has a critical impact on navigation, as leaning piles and fractured stumps can drift through the canals, posing substantial risks to boats and vessels. With the arrival of seasonal fog, reduced visibility further amplifies the danger of collisions and potential vessel damage.
Although current preservation strategies aim to mitigate the impact of marine borers, they remain limited in effectively protecting wooden piles [2,6] (discussed in Section 6). Despite the natural durability of the aforementioned European hardwood species [6,12,13,14] employed for mooring piles, their resistance to degradation by shipworms is generally low and decreases further as water temperature rises. According to the literature, only some tropical wood species are considered resistant to shipworm attacks [15,16]. All other species are susceptible to shipworm attacks and should either be treated with preservatives or protected using mechanical barriers to prevent infestation. The primary factors influencing wood resistance to shipworms in marine environments are the wood hardness and the presence of extractives [10,11,12,17,18,19]. Hardness is influenced by wood density, meaning that more dense wood tends to have greater hardness and, consequently, better resistance to tunnel excavation. Oak wood generally exhibits a low silica content below 0.5%. This makes it not relevant against shipworm attacks, where concentrations exceeding 1% can enhance resistance to wood-boring organisms such as shipworms.
In order to address this issue, the effects of shipworms on the durability of 22 full-length oak mooring piles employed in 19 different docking areas in Venice were investigated [9], thanks to the support of the ACTV S.p.A of Venice. A total of 298 samples were extracted from the piles and analysed. The goal is to identify the physical properties of oak piles that increase the oak durability against marine borers, resulting in consequent extensions of their time in service. In particular, this study investigates the following:
(a)
The impact of shipworm infestation on oak piles, to determine whether the piles’ durability correlates with higher density and larger pile diameters used in Venice (see Section 3).
(b)
Environmental factors such as temperature, salinity, pH, and dissolved oxygen levels influencing the speed and activity of shipworms across different sites in Venice, highlighting their potential role in affecting the durability of wooden piles [10,20] (see Section 5).
This research aims to improve the economic efficiency of infrastructure management in Venice, reducing the need for frequent pile replacement and promoting more sustainable use of wood as a construction material. The novelty of this study lies in the opportunity to conduct a large-scale empirical assessment of oak mooring piles after being used in real marine conditions, correlating their physical properties with resistance to shipworms, and offering insights for sustainable material choices in the historically and environmentally sensitive context of Venice.

2. Materials

The materials comprised 22 oak mooring piles from 19 docking areas in Venice. The mooring piles were extracted and replaced after showing extensive degradation due to shipworms. The oak piles are sourced from managed forests in France and the Netherlands (specific locations not disclosed). They are derived from plantations of Quercus species, with trees ranging in age from 40 to 100 years. At the time of extraction, all the piles exhibited approximately uniform degradation despite having different durations of service between 18 and 140 months. This uniform degradation allowed the authors to investigate the effects of shipworms on the material properties of the piles after varying periods of exposure to seawater. The code and name of the docking sites of the full-scale mooring piles are listed in Table 1, along with time in service and the diameter of the head (Dhead—largest diameter of the pile head coming out of the water) and the tip (Dtip—smallest diameter of the bottom part of the pile inserted in the soil). Figure 2 shows the map of the docking sites according to Table 1. Three groups were made based on the time in service: 0–30 months (group A), 30–100 months (group B), and above 100 months (group C). This grouping was designed to ensure a sufficient statistical distribution of data for analysis. At the time of the laboratory test, the moisture content of the piles ranged from 12 to 30% (see Section 3).

3. Methodology

The impact of shipworms on the investigated oak piles was assessed in relation to the sound basic density and pile diameter. This was performed to assess whether larger cross sections or higher densities of the piles could imply an increased durability against marine borers. This investigation aimed to explore the possibility of using oak piles with potential thresholds for pile diameters and density for an improved service life of the piles that are in direct contact with seawater and exposed to the attack of shipworms. Six parameters were investigated: wood species, density at 12% moisture content, sound basic density, residual basic density, total annual rings, and growth ring width.
In total, 22 oak degraded piles were investigated. Upon extraction, it was observed that all the piles displayed similar levels of degradation, despite varying durations of service life.
A total of 298 20 × 20 × 30 mm3 samples were extracted along 4 slices of non-degraded discs sawn from the piles (Figure 3). The weight and volume of samples were determined at test moisture content, ranging from 12 to 30%. The dry mass and maximum moisture content were determined by oven-drying the samples according to EN 13183-1 (2002) [21]. Subsequently, the density at MC = 12% (ρ12) was determined in Equation (1) as the ratio between the calculated mass m12 (Equation (2)) and volume V12 at MC = 12% (Equation (3)). The volumetric shrinkage at MC = 12% was assumed to be roughly 15% according to [13,22] for oak (Quercus robur) and Turkey oak (Quercus cerris)—which present similar physical properties—calculated on the basis of 3 assumptions: shrinkage starts at the fibre saturation point (MC = 30%); the dimensions of the pile decrease linearly with decreasing MC; and variability in volumetric shrinkage can be expressed using a coefficient of variation of approximately 15%, accounting for wood’s intrinsic growth characteristics.
ρ12 = m12/V12
m12 = mdry (1 + uref)
V12 = Vwet ∙ (1 − S0) ∙ (1 − uref/u30)
where
Vwet = saturated volume at test moisture content.
u30 = 30% moisture content at fibre saturation point (assumed equal to 30% [22]).
uref = 12% moisture content at 12%.
S0 = 15% volumetric shrinkage from MC = 30% to MC = 0%, assumed 15% for oak.
Finally, the basic density (BD) was derived from ρ12 at MC = 12% by using the experimental relationship between ρ12 and BD outlined in [23]: BD = 0.828 ρ12. The residual basic density (RBD) was determined as the ratio between the measured BD and the average basic density of sound oak (Quercus robur): BD = 0.68 g/cm3 and Turkey oak (Quercus cerris) BD = 0.7 g/cm3 from the same species, derived from literature [13,24,25,26].
The wood density is influenced by growth parameters such as the diameter, number of annual rings (age), and annual ring width (ARW) [17,26,27,28,29]. These growth aspects are important to consider in relation to the wood quality in order to study the durability of wooden foundation piles against shipworms. The wood density is susceptible to the growing conditions of the trees in the forest, environmental conditions, and forest management practices [30,31,32]. To this end, the wood quality was assessed by measuring the average ARW using a dendro-chronograph (accuracy of 0.001 mm), proceeding along two orthogonal radii within the cross section of the pile. The ARW was then calculated as the average of the two measurements.

4. Results

At the moment of the extraction, the piles often appeared intact from the outside. Subsequent subdivision in discs (Figure 3) revealed that the piles were extensively tunnelled by Teredinidae larvae along the entire submerged section, from the seabed up to the waterline. The tunnels created by these shipworms ranged in diameter from 1 mm to 10 mm, significantly compromising the structural integrity of the piles. The situation is particularly dangerous because the damage in the piles is difficult to assess, including the extent of internal degradation and the imminent risk of structural failure. This makes it extremely challenging to predict and prevent collapses in advance.
All the analysed 298 samples were extracted from sound parts of the piles to check if the original density could have an impact on shipworm attacks. Table 2 shows the results of the physical characterisation of the piles, divided into three groups based on their time in service (0–30 months: group A; 30–100 months: group B; above 100 months: group C).
Two oak wood species were identified: Quercus robur and Quercus cerris. The two species share identical anatomical features. However, Quercus cerris exhibits a visible colourimetric difference in its extractives, allowing it to be distinguished from Quercus robur [17]. Only two Turkey oak piles were found, likely due to the species’ lower abundance in the lagoon. No significant difference was found for ρ12 and BD of groups A, B, and C (Figure 4). The RBD values were around 80%, confirming that all the analysed samples were taken out of residual non-tunnelled parts of the piles, considered as sound [33]. The age, diameter, and ARW had no influence on the time in service of the piles, suggesting that larger pile diameters do not imply a slower attack of shipworms. In general, the results suggest that the degradation caused by shipworms on oak piles in Venice is neither related to the density nor the diameter of the piles, nor to growth characteristics such as the age and ARW.
Fungi were found on the portions of the piles exposed to water flow [34,35,36] and submerged underwater. Certain fungi, particularly soft rot fungi, may have facilitated shipworm infestation, as reported in the literature [13,37]. However, it remains unclear whether this preferential attack on wood decayed by fungi is driven by chemical compounds produced by the fungi, such as albumin, or by the weakened structural integrity of the decayed wood. These aspects were not investigated.

5. Environmental Factors Affecting the Durability of Oak Mooring Piles

Water temperature and salinity play a crucial role in the survival of shipworms. The shipworm activity slows down below 15 °C, and salinity concentrations below approximately 8 PSU (Practical Salinity Units) act as a strong inhibitor. These values can change depending on the marine borer species [38,39]. This explains why infestations are typically less severe near river mouths, where freshwater dilutes the salinity. In the case of Venice, the average salinity of the water measured during spring 2024 was, on average, 30.5 ± 0.1 PSU (sourced from secondary data from ARPA Veneto [38]). Similar data were measured from 1961 to 2009 [40,41], suggesting that the lagoon water around Venice can be considered at steady-state. In this period, small perturbations in salinity were measured due to freshwater input from the Adriatic Sea. Over long periods, salinity has returned to its long-term average and maintained its distinct spatial distribution [40]. However, in the last decade, summer seasons have been particularly extreme in temperatures, where water temperatures reach up to 29 °C [38]. Clustering analysis showed the occurrence of summer heatwaves in 2008, 2013, 2015, and 2018, and three warm, prolonged summers (2012, 2017, 2019) coincided with higher summer water salinity peaks of 34 PSU [30,40]. These heatwaves have been linked to higher shipworm infestation rates, suggesting a direct correlation between elevated water temperatures and shipworm activity [7]. In general, the analysis of the air temperature datasets revealed an increasing trend over the Veneto Coast with values up to 0.9 °C/10 y in the city of Venice (calculated over the 2003–2020 period) [42]. This means that the temperature in Venice has increased by approximately 2 °C in the last two decades, already exceeding the global limit of 1.5 °C defined by the Paris Agreement [43]. Rising water temperatures and high salinity in the lagoon habitat may have affected the biology of the shipworms in the city of Venice, potentially making their attack on wood more aggressive. Wood species such as oak wood that were once considered resistant for longer periods of time (5–7 years) in the lagoon environment may have become more vulnerable in warmer conditions, decreasing the durability of oak wood to 18–24 months. Dissolved oxygen levels measured during spring 2024 were, on average, 102.3 ± 1.0% in the lagoon around Venice, in line with the average data recorded from 2011 to 2021 [38]. The water in Venice is a good environment where marine wood borers, like shipworms, can survive and reproduce, typically with levels of dissolved oxygen above 45% [39].
Another consideration involves the effect of storm surge barriers in Venice, such as MOSE (Experimental Electromechanical Module) [44]. The substantial storm-driven sediment supply and freshwater input are significantly reduced by the operation of storm surge barriers, which are essential factors in maintaining the lagoon’s ecosystem. This highlights a critical conflict between the goals of coastal flood protection and the preservation of natural ecosystems [44]. Consequently, the alteration of these environmental factors could potentially influence the behaviour and distribution of marine species in the Venice Lagoon, including shipworms. This issue remains an open question. Further research is envisaged to study how storm surge barriers may alter the environmental conditions related to shipworm behaviour. This could provide valuable insights for balancing flood protection systems in the Venice Lagoon with the long-term sustainability of the marine ecosystem.

6. Discussion

From an environmental and sustainability perspective, the continuous use of European oak mooring piles in Venice may not be the most sustainable choice. Oak wood, requiring frequent replacement due to its rapid deterioration caused by shipworms, leads to increased resource consumption and waste generation. The environmental impact of cutting and replacing oak piles every 18–24 months, along with the associated transportation and disposal costs, could result in a significant carbon footprint over time.

6.1. Regulations on Mooring Piles in Venice

Until 2015, the use of tropical hardwoods or protective coatings was prohibited in the historic centre of Venice due to heritage regulations. These regulations mandated the use of traditional wood species that are historically and architecturally significant to the city, preventing the adoption of other wood species that could alter the cultural heritage of Venice. In 2015, new regulations were provided by the municipality of Venice [2] in response to the frequent pile replacements due to degradation, making preservation costly, not sustainable, and labour-intensive. The new regulations allow the use of two tropical hardwoods (Demerara greenheart and Azobe) and the use of piles made of expanded polyurethane and a metal core, extruded piles made of recycled or virgin polyethylene, and piles made of wood–plastic composites (WPCs) [45,46]. Even with these alternatives available, many new oak mooring piles in Venice are still being installed without any protective treatment.

6.2. Environmental Considerations of Alternative Wood Species and Materials

Although tropical hardwoods offer increased durability against marine borers, their use in Venice can contribute significantly to deforestation and incurs high environmental costs due to the long-distance transport from tropical regions to Europe [47]. The sourcing of tropical hardwood logs is often linked with deforestation, biodiversity loss, and climate change [47]. These concerns highlight the growing necessity for sustainable sourcing practices. When harvested responsibly from certified sources—such as FSC-certified forests [48]—tropical hardwoods can offer a more environmentally friendly alternative. Certification ensures that tropical hardwood logging supports biodiversity, maintains forest productivity, and preserves ecological processes in the forests.
Questions also arise regarding the use of polyurethane and polyethylene piles, particularly concerning their sustainability impact on the lagoon ecosystem and potential pollution [45]. The release of microplastics, defined as plastic particles measuring 1 mm or less, is already widely present in the marine environment of Venice Lagoon, originating from the fragmentation of larger plastic debris [49,50]. Microplastic pollution has emerged as a significant environmental concern due to its potential toxic effects caused by microplastic ingestion by marine organisms, potentially introducing toxic substances in marine food and posing a risk to human health [51]. Therefore, polyurethane and polyethylene piles need constant monitoring to assess the potential release of micro- and macroplastics into the water. Furthermore, the piles should be wrapped with metal straps (as suggested in [2]) to prevent abrasion from contact with boats while docking, which could cause further material degradation and the release of plastics into the water.

6.3. Protection Techniques: Advantages and Limitations

Two protection techniques were introduced in 2015 [2] to improve the durability of wooden mooring piles in the Venetian Lagoon environment. The first method involves protecting piles with heat-shrink tubing to prevent shipworm attacks. However, this approach is limited to mooring piles not intended for boat or ferry docking, as docking vessels can cause damage to the protective covering. The second one, known as “Metal Stapling” (graffettatura in Italian), is described in [2] and patented by Castagna S. [52]. Metal stapling of piles involves driving metal staples into the part of the wooden mooring pile intended for immersion. Once in water, the metal staples oxidise, creating a homogeneous ferrous oxide barrier on and underneath the water-exposed surface of the pile, protecting the wood from degradation caused by shipworms [52]. This method can extend the lifespan of oak mooring piles, with an average durability of 15 years. However, the applicability of these protection techniques is limited by the fact that piles with metal staples should be driven in the soil in the fall, when shipworm activity is lower [2,6,7]. This timing allows sufficient time—at least 4 months—for the metal staples to corrode in water and form a protective ferrous oxide layer within the wood matrix. While the methods presented offer valuable insights into their respective advantages and disadvantages, they do not exhaust all possibilities, leaving room for future research.

7. Conclusions

This study examined the rapid degradation of oak mooring piles caused by shipworms across 19 docking areas in Venice, currently leading to the frequent replacement of the piles, higher maintenance costs, and more material wastage. The density and diameter of 22 oak piles used in different locations were analysed to assess their impact on durability against shipworms. Additionally, environmental factors such as temperature, salinity, pH, and dissolved oxygen levels were considered to evaluate their role in the increasing shipworm attacks across different sites, which could significantly influence the durability of oak piles.
Significant degradation levels were found within the oak mooring piles of several docking areas of Venice, related to the attack of shipworms. The results of the material characterisation and analysis showed that quality factors of oak piles, such as the density, annual ring width, and diameter, had no significant impact on durability against shipworms. Larger or denser oak piles did not show an improved resistance against shipworm attacks after a period between 30 and 140 months.
The main environmental factors affecting the durability of mooring piles were identified as follows:
-
Rising water temperature and more frequent heatwaves in summer seasons. Venice’s lagoon has maintained a relatively stable salinity (ca. 30 PSU) since 1960, but rising temperatures (up to 29 °C in summer) and more frequent heatwaves in summer may intensify shipworm activity, reducing the durability of traditionally used oak piles from the recorded average of 5–7 years between 2000 and 2010 to the 18–24 months measured in the last decade. This trend may intensify in future, as air temperatures in Venice have increased by 2 °C over the past two decades, exceeding the 1.5 °C threshold set by the Paris Agreement.
-
Dissolved oxygen levels (approximately 100%) continue to provide optimal conditions for shipworm survival.
-
The stable and abundant population of warm-water shipworms (T. bartschi), present in the Venice Lagoon since 2013, exhibits greater aggressiveness and contributes to faster pile degradation.
-
Storm surge barriers (MOSE barrier in Venice) may alter natural sediment and freshwater input, potentially affecting shipworm behaviour.
Despite the availability of more durable materials and preservation techniques, the continued use of unprotected oak piles in Venice highlights a critical gap in conservation practices. While tropical hardwoods offer increased durability against marine borers, their use in Venice raises concerns about deforestation and the environmental cost of transporting them from tropical regions to Europe. The sustainability of polyurethane and polyethylene piles also remains a concern, particularly regarding their potential impact on the lagoon ecosystem and pollution caused by the release of micro- and macroplastics into the water. The abrasion from boat contact during docking could accelerate material degradation and plastic pollution. For this, constant monitoring is needed, leading to increasing costs and potential sustainability issues, which contribute to a social gap that needs social investigation to determine whether this is an actual or perceived obstacle. The two protection techniques involving heat-shrink tubing and metal stapling present limitations. The first protection technique is only suitable for mooring piles not used for boat or ferry docking, as vessel contact can damage the protective covering. The use of metal stapling is also limited, both in application and by the necessity of longitudinal metal plates to shield boats from potential damage caused by the staples during docking, creating extra costs. Furthermore, piles with metal stapling must be installed exclusively in the fall, when shipworm activity is lower, to ensure the effective development of a protective ferrous oxide barrier within the wood over at least four months.
Future research is still needed to address the multidisciplinary issues related to the rapid degradation of mooring piles in Venice and the challenges associated with alternative solutions, protection techniques, the impact of storm surge barriers on environmental changes, and maintenance strategies of the mooring piles.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, G.P. and T.U.; methodology, G.P. and T.U.; validation, G.P. and T.U.; formal analysis, G.P. and T.U.; investigation, G.P. and T.U.; resources, T.U.; data curation, G.P. and T.U.; writing—original draft preparation, G.P.; writing—review and editing, G.P.; visualisation, G.P. and T.U.; supervision, G.P. and T.U.; project administration, G.P. and T.U.; funding acquisition, T.U. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by ACTV S.p.A (Azienda del Consorzio Trasporti Veneziano).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the University of Padova for their collaboration and the data provided on the wooden piles of Venice, and ACTV S.p.A., for having funded this research project.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflicts of interest were reported by the authors.

References

  1. Guarneri, I.; Sigovini, M.; Keppel, E.; Volpi Ghirardini, A.; Libralato, G.; Tagliapietra, D. Wood degradation in Venice lagoon: Evaluation of different pole types to contrast borers action. In Proceedings of the 7th European Coastal Lagoons Symposium, Murcia, Spain, 1–4 March 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Comune di Venezia. Municipality of Venice: Regulation for Mooring Piles. Available online: https://www.comune.venezia.it/it/content/normativa-circolazione-acquea (accessed on 1 April 2025).
  3. Pizzinato, F. Le Briccole del Centro Storico di Venezia: Caratteristiche del Legno e Durata in Opera. Master’s Thesis, Universtiy of Padova, Padova Italy, 2007. (In Italian). [Google Scholar]
  4. Cavaggioni, I.; Lionello, A. Le fondazioni storiche a Venezia. In II Sistema Delle Fondazioni Lignee a Venezia; Biscontin, G., Izzo, F., Rinaldi, E., Eds.; CORILA: Venezia, Italy, 2009; pp. 9–24. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  5. Guarneri, I.; Russo, E.; Sabino, A.; Bergamasco, A.; Sigovini, M. BUILD & DESTROY—How Bioengineers Act on the Environment, Research in the Lagoon of Venice. In Proceedings of the Retreat Cnr-Ismar, Frascati, Italy, 25–27 September 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. CNR-ISMAR. La Degradazione dei Legno ad Opera Delle Teredini in Laguna di Venezia; Durabilità dei materiali ed intensità di attacco degli xilofagi”; Technical report; CNR-ISMAR: Venezia, Italy, 2011. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  7. Tagliapietra, D.; Guarneri, I.; Keppel, E.; Sigovini, M. After a century in the Mediterranean, the warm-water shipworm Teredo bartschi invades the Lagoon of Venice (Italy), overwintering a few degrees above zero. Biol. Invasions 2021, 23, 1595–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gasparoli, P.; Trovò, F. Venezia Fragile—Processi di Usura del Sistema Urbano e Possibili Mitigazioni; Atralinea Edizioni: Firenze, Italy, 2014; p. 139. ISBN 978-88-98743-18-6. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  9. Urso, T.; Crivellaro, A. Relazione Tecnica Relativa Alle Indagini Sulla Qualità e il Degrado del Legno di Palificazioni per Ormeggi Nella Laguna di Venezia; Technical Report; Dipartimento Territorio e Sistemi Agro Forestali, University of Padova: Padova, Italy, 2008. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  10. Borges, L.M.S.; Merckelbach, L.M.; Sampaio, Í.; Cragg, S.M. Diversity, environmental requirements, and biogeography of bivalve wood borers (Teredinidae) in European coastal waters. Front. Zool. 2014, 11, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Eriksen, A.M.; Gregory, D.; Shashoua, Y. Selective attack of waterlogged archaeological wood by the shipworm, Teredo navalis and its implications for in situ preservation. J. Archaeol. Sci. 2015, 55, 9–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cragg, S.M. Timber in the marine environment. Timber Trades J. 1996, 376, 26–28. [Google Scholar]
  13. Giordano, G. Tecnologia del Legno; Utet: Torino, Italy, 1988; Volume 3, tomo 2. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  14. Schweingruber, F.H. Anatomy of European Woods; Verlag Paul Haupt: Stuttgart, Germany, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  15. Eaton, R.A.; Hale, M.D.C. Wood: Decay, Pests and Protection; Chapman & Hall: London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  16. Palanti, S.; Feci, E.; Anichini, M. Comparison between four tropical wood species for their resistance to marine borers (Teredo spp. and Limnoria spp.) in the Strait of Messina. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2015, 104, 472–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deaconu, I.; Porojan, M.; Timar, M.C.; Bedelean, B.; Campean, M. Comparative research on the structure, chemistry, and physical properties of Turkey oak and sessile oak wood. BioResources 2023, 18, 5724–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Schneider, P.F.; Freitag, C.M.; Morrell, J.J. Decay resistance of satwater-exposed douglas-fir piles. Wood Fiber Sci. 1997, 29, 370–374. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hernández, A.B.; Angelini, C. Wood traits and tidal exposure mediate shipworm infestation and biofouling in southeastern U.S. estuaries. Ecol. Eng. 2019, 132, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Bertolini, C.; Royer, E.; Pastres, R. Multiple Evidence for Climate Patterns Influencing Ecosystem Productivity across Spatial Gradients in the Venice Lagoon. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2021, 9, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. NEN-EN 13183-1:2002; Moisture Content of a Piece of Sawn Timber—Part 1: Determination by Weighing and Kiln Drying. CEN: Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
  22. Ross, R.J. Wood Handbook Wood as an Engineering Material; General Technical Report FPL-GTR-282; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI, USA, 2021; 543p.
  23. Vieilledent, G.; Fischer, F.J.; Chave, J.; Guibal, D.; Langbour, P.; Gérard, J. New formula and conversion factor to compute basic wood density of tree species using a global wood technology database. Am. J. Bot. 2018, 105, 1653–1661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fioravanti, M. La identificazione anatomica del legno di Cerro. In Proceedings of the Prospettive di Valorizzazione Delle Cerrete dell’Italia Centro-Meridionale (Atti Convegno), Potenza, Italy, 3–4 October 1988. (In Italian). [Google Scholar]
  25. Jakubowski, M.; Dobroczyński, M. Allocation of Wood Density in European Oak (Quercus robur L.) Trees Grown under a Canopy of Scots Pine. Forests 2021, 12, 712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tomczak, K.; Tomczak, A.; Jelonek, T. Measuring Radial Variation in Basic Density of Pendulate Oak: Comparing Increment Core Samples with the IML Power Drill. Forests 2022, 13, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Giagli, K.; Baar, J.; Fajstavr, M.; Gryc, V.; Vavrčík, H. Tree-ring width and variation of wood density in Fraxinus excelsior L. and Quercus robur L. growing in floodplain forests. BioResources 2018, 13, 804–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pagella, G.; Mirra, M.; Ravenshorst, G.; Gard, W.; van de Kuilen, J.W. Characterization of the remaining material and mechanical properties of historic wooden foundation piles in Amsterdam. Construction and Building Materials. 2024, 450, 138616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zobel, B.J.; van Buijtenen, J.P. The Effect of Growth Rate on Wood Properties. In Wood Variation; Springer Series in Wood Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chauhan, S.; Donnelly, R.; Huang Cl Nakada, R.; Yafang, Y.; Walker, J.C.F. Wood quality: In context. In Primary Wood Processing; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  31. Löf, M.; Brunet, J.; Filyushkina, A.; Lindbladh, M.; Skovsgaard, J.P.; Felton, A. Management of oak forests: Striking a balance between timber production, biodiversity and cultural services. Int. J. Biodivers. Sci. Ecosyst. Serv. Manag. 2016, 12, 59–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ramage, M.H.; Burridge, H.; Busse-Wicher, M.; Fereday, G.; Reynolds, T.; Shah, D.U.; Wu, G.; Yu, L.; Fleming, P.; Densley-Tingley, D.; et al. The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 68, 333–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Pagella, G.; Urso, T.; Mirra, M.; Naldini, S.; van de Kuilen, J.W. Traditional wooden foundation piles in Amsterdam and Venice: Techniques for the assessment of their state of conservation. Wood Mater. Sci. Eng. 2025, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Enzi, S.; Camuffo, D. Documentary sources of the sea surges in Venice from AD 787 to 1867. Nat. Hazards 1995, 12, 225–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lionello, P.; Nicholls, R.J.; Umgiesser, G.; Zanchettin, D. Venice flooding and sea level: Past evolution, present issues, and future projections (introduction to the special issue). Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2021, 21, 2633–2641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zanchettin, D.; Bruni, S.; Raicich, F.; Lionello, P.; Adloff, F.; Androsov, A.; Antonioli, F.; Artale, V.; Carminati, E.; Ferrarin, C.; et al. Sea-level rise in Venice: Historic and future trends (review article). Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2021, 21, 2643–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Beltrán-Flores, E.; Tayar, S.; Blánquez, P.; Sarrà, M. Effect of dissolved oxygen on the degradation activity and consumption capacity of white-rot fungi. J. Water Process Eng. 2023, 55, 104105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. ARPA Veneto. Monitoraggio della Laguna di Venezia ai Sensi della Direttiva 2000/60/CE Finalizzato alla Definizione dello Stato Ecologico Campagna Primaverile; Rapporti di campagna-laguna di Venezia Report; ARPA Veneto: Padova, Italy, 2024. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  39. Knight KYCousins, T.A.; Parham, D. A comparison of biodegradation caused by Teredinidae (Mollusca:Bivalvia), Limnoriidae (Crustacea:Isopoda), and C. terebans (Crustacea:Amphipoda) across 4 shipwreck sites in the English Channel. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 2019, 23, 854–867. [Google Scholar]
  40. Zirino, A.; Elwany, H.; Neira, C.; Maicu, F.; Mendoza, G.; Levin, L. Salinity and its variability in the Lagoon of Venice, 2000–2009. Adv. Oceanogr. Limnol. 2014, 5, 41–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Ghezzo, M.; Sarretta, A.; Sigovini, M.; Guerzoni, S.; Tagliapietra, D.; Umgiesser, G. Modeling the inter-annual variability of salinity in the lagoon of Venice in relation to the water framework directive typologies. Ocean. Coast. Manag. 2011, 54, 706–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ferrarin, C.; Bonaldo, D.; Bergamasco, A.; Ghezzo, M. Sea level and temperature extremes in a regulated Lagoon of Venice. Front. Clim. 2024, 5, 1330388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Paris Agreement, Paris Climate Change Conference-November 2015. COP 21. Available online: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2025).
  44. Tognin, D.; D’Alpaos, A.; Marani, M.; Carniello, L. Marsh resilience to sea-level rise reduced by storm-surge barriers in the Venice Lagoon. Nat. Geosci. 2021, 14, 906–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Elsheikh, A.H.; Panchal, H.; Shanmugan, S.; Muthuramalingam, T.; El-Kassas, A.M.; Ramesh, B. Recent progresses in wood-plastic composites: Pre-processing treatments, manufacturing techniques, recyclability and eco-friendly assessment. Clean. Eng. Technol. 2022, 8, 100450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Woodn Greenwood. Available online: https://woodngreenwood.com/en/wpc-laboratory/ (accessed on 19 March 2024).
  47. Treu, A.; Zimmer, K.; Brischke, C.; Larnøy, E.; Ross, L.; Aloui, F.; Cragg, S.; Flæte, P.O.; Humar, M.; Westin, M.; et al. Durability and Protection of Timber Structures in Marine Environments in Europe: An Overview. Bioresources 2019, 14, 10161–10184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. FSC-STD-40-004 V3-1 EN; Chain of Custody Certification. Forest Stewardship Council (FSC): Bonn, Germany, 2021.
  49. Vianello, A.; Boldrin, A.; Guerriero, P.; Moschino, V.; Rella, R.; Sturaro, A.; Da Ros, L. Occurrence and distribution of microplastic particles in the sediments of the lagoon of Venice, Italy: Preliminary results. In Proceedings of the ECSA 50 Today’s Science for Tomorrow’s Management, Mestre, Italy, 3–6 June 2012. [Google Scholar]
  50. Vianello, A.; Boldrin, A.; Guerriero, P.; Moschino, V.; Rella, R.; Sturaro, A.; Da Ros, L. Microplastic particles in sediments of Lagoon of Venice, Italy: First observations. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2013, 130, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Teuten, E.L.; Saquing, J.M.; Knappe, D.R.; Barlaz, M.A.; Jonsson, S.; Björn, A.; Rowland, S.J.; Thompson, R.C.; Galloway, T.S.; Yamashita, R.; et al. Transport and release of chemicals from plastics to the environment and to wildlife. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci. 2009, 364, 1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. European Patent Office. Immersed Wood Protection Method and System. Patent from Castagna Sandro DK2408601 (T3), 7 March 2010. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Mooring piles in Venice Lagoon: (a) single mooring pile for navigation purposes; (b) group of three mooring piles; (c) large group of mooring piles employed in a docking station in Venice (adaptation from [3]).
Figure 1. Mooring piles in Venice Lagoon: (a) single mooring pile for navigation purposes; (b) group of three mooring piles; (c) large group of mooring piles employed in a docking station in Venice (adaptation from [3]).
Sustainability 17 04327 g001
Figure 2. Map of Venice Lagoon and docking sites according to Table 1: (a) Venice and its surroundings, (b) Fusina at the west side of Venice, (c) Villaggio Caroman at the south side of the lagoon.
Figure 2. Map of Venice Lagoon and docking sites according to Table 1: (a) Venice and its surroundings, (b) Fusina at the west side of Venice, (c) Villaggio Caroman at the south side of the lagoon.
Sustainability 17 04327 g002
Figure 3. (a) Oak pile retrieved from a docking area in Venice; (b) pile disc from which the samples were extracted.
Figure 3. (a) Oak pile retrieved from a docking area in Venice; (b) pile disc from which the samples were extracted.
Sustainability 17 04327 g003
Figure 4. Box plots for (a) RBD; (b) ρ12; (c) BD; (d) ARW of the three categories of oak piles (A, B, C) in Venice.
Figure 4. Box plots for (a) RBD; (b) ρ12; (c) BD; (d) ARW of the three categories of oak piles (A, B, C) in Venice.
Sustainability 17 04327 g004
Table 1. Preliminary data of the wooden piles analysed in 19 docking areas in Venice.
Table 1. Preliminary data of the wooden piles analysed in 19 docking areas in Venice.
CodeDocking SiteTime in Service (Months)Dhead (mm)Dtip (mm)
1Punta Sabbioni Motonave18440435
2Punta Sabbioni Motonave18375345
3Lido S.M.E.37340325
4Caroman23335285
5Redentore34480385
6San Giorgio25355330
6a420375
7Cimitero Mura25310275
8Salute20355210
9aSan Marco Vallaresso132330310
9b335280
10Sacca Fisola Valle
Traghetto
127430385
11San Servolo29350330
12Fusina38380350
13aFusina38380365
13b385375
14Giardini destro22315290
15Santa Maria difesa rampa140330310
16Santa Maria difesa rampa140385355
17Cantiere S. Elena134265240
18Giardini Partigiana57545475
19Bricola 77 segnalazione canale84380340
Table 2. Non-decayed physical properties of 22 piles retrieved from 19 docking areas in Venice.
Table 2. Non-decayed physical properties of 22 piles retrieved from 19 docking areas in Venice.
GroupCodeTime in Service (Months)Dhead (mm)Dtip (mm)Speciesρ12 (g/cm3)BD (g/cm3)ARW (mm/Year)Age (Years)RBD (%)
A118440435Oak (Quercus Robur)0.650.541.7612476
218375345Oak (Quercus Robur)0.680.561.1515780
820355210Oak (Quercus Robur)0.740.611.758187
1422315290Oak (Quercus Robur)0.650.542.226876
423335285Oak (Quercus Robur)0.690.572.705781
625355330Oak (Quercus Robur)0.680.561.5910879
6a25420375Oak (Quercus Robur)0.690.57--82
725310275Oak (Quercus Robur)0.710.591.1912383
1129350330Oak (Quercus Robur)0.670.561.938879
B534480385Oak (Quercus Robur)0.720.602.698085
337340325Oak (Quercus Robur)0.780.651.819292
1238380350Oak (Quercus Robur)-----
13a38380365Oak (Quercus Robur)0.700.581.7011082
13b38385375Oak (Quercus Robur)0.680.57--80
1857545475Turkey Oak (Quercus Cerris)0.730.612.1112186
1984380340Oak (Quercus Robur)0.810.672.068795
C10127430385Oak (Quercus Robur)0.680.571.3015780
9a132330310Oak (Quercus Robur)0.730.601.1513985
9b132335280Oak (Quercus Robur)0.710.592.097483
17134265240Oak (Quercus Robur)0.780.641.0911692
15140330310Turkey Oak (Quercus Cerris)0.660.551.649878
16140385355Oak (Quercus Robur)0.670.551.6910978
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pagella, G.; Urso, T. Material and Environmental Factors Impacting the Durability of Oak Mooring Piles in Venice, Italy. Sustainability 2025, 17, 4327. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104327

AMA Style

Pagella G, Urso T. Material and Environmental Factors Impacting the Durability of Oak Mooring Piles in Venice, Italy. Sustainability. 2025; 17(10):4327. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104327

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pagella, Giorgio, and Tiziana Urso. 2025. "Material and Environmental Factors Impacting the Durability of Oak Mooring Piles in Venice, Italy" Sustainability 17, no. 10: 4327. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104327

APA Style

Pagella, G., & Urso, T. (2025). Material and Environmental Factors Impacting the Durability of Oak Mooring Piles in Venice, Italy. Sustainability, 17(10), 4327. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17104327

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop