Emotions of Educators Conducting Emergency Remote Teaching during COVID-19 Confinement
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Teachers’ Emotional Experiences
3. Objectives and Hypotheses
4. Method
4.1. Sample
4.2. Instrument
4.3. Process
4.4. Data Analysis
5. Results
5.1. Positive and Negative Emotions
5.2. Gender
5.3. Age
5.4. Educational Levels
6. Discussion
7. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Real Decreto 476/2020, de 27 de Marzo, por el que se Prorroga el Estado de Alarma Declarado por el Real Decreto 463/2020, de 14 de marzo, por el Quese Declara el Estado de Alarma para la Gestión de la Situación de Crisis Sanitaria Ocasionada por el COVID-19, BOE núm. 86. Available online: https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2020/03/28/pdfs/BOE-A-2020-4155.pdf (accessed on 23 December 2023).
- UNESCO. Adverse Consequences of School Closures. UNESCO´s COVID-19 Education Response. 2020. Available online: https://es.unesco.org/node/320395 (accessed on 23 December 2023).
- Moorhouse, B.L. Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Educ. Teach. 2020, 46, 609–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hodges, C.; Moore, S.; Lockee, B.; Trust, T.; Bond, A. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. In Educause Review; Educause: Denver, CO, USA, 2020; Available online: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning (accessed on 23 December 2023).
- Czerkawski, B.C.; Lyman, E.W. An Instructional Design Framework for Fostering Student Engagement in Online Learning Environments. TechTrends 2016, 60, 532–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnson, R.D.; Hornik, S.; Salas, E. An empirical examination of factors contributing to the creation of successful e-learning environments. Int. J. Human-Comput. Stud. 2008, 66, 356–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Noesgaard, S.S.; Ørngreen, R. The effectiveness of e-learning: An explorative and integrative review of the definitions, methodologies and factors that promote e-learning effectiveness. Electron. J. e-Learn. 2015, 13, 278–290. [Google Scholar]
- Mansell, R.; Tremblay, G. Renewing the Knowledge Societies Vision: Towards Knowledge Societies for Peace and Sustainable Development. In Proceedings of the UNESCO’s First WSIS+10 Review Event, Paris, France, 25–27 February 2013; Available online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0022/002245/224531E.pdf (accessed on 23 December 2023).
- European Commission. Digitally Competent Educational Organisations. DigCompOrg. 2016. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/digcomporg (accessed on 23 December 2023).
- Consejo de la Unión Europea. Recomendación del Consejo, de 18 de Diciembre de 2018, Relativa a las Competencias Clave para el Aprendizaje Permanente; Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea: Luxembourg, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- INTEF. Portafolio de la Competencia Digital Docente. Recuperadode. 2018. Available online: http://enlinea.intef.es/courses/course-v1:SPOOC (accessed on 23 December 2023).
- Adedoyin, O.B.; Soykan, E. COVID-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2020, 31, 863–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guillén-Gámez, F.D.; Lugones, A.; Mayorga-Fernández, M.J. ICT use by pre-service foreign languages teachers according to gender, age and motivation. Cogent Educ. 2019, 6, 1574693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pinto-Llorente, A.M.; Sánchez-Gómez, M.C.; García-Peñalvo, F.J.; Casillas-Martín, S. Students’ perceptions and attitudes towards asynchronous technological tools in blended-learning training to improve grammatical competence in English as a second language. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2017, 72, 632–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadaf, A.; Newby, T.J.; Ertmer, P.A. An investigation of the factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions and integration of Web 2.0 tools. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 2016, 64, 37–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scherer, R.; Siddiq, F.; Teo, T. Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers’ perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Comput. Educ. 2015, 88, 202–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loveless, A. Technology, pedagogy and education: Reflections on the accomplishment of what teachers know, do and believe in a digital age. Technol. Pedagog. Educ. 2011, 20, 301–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Almenara, J.C.; Gimeno, A.M. Las tecnologías de la información y comunicación y la formación inicial de los docentes. Modelos y competencias digitales. Profr. Rev. Curric. Form. Profr. 2019, 23, 247–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, M.-L. Emotion Display Rules, Emotion Regulation, and Teacher Burnout. Front. Educ. 2020, 5, 90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Skaalvik, E.M.; Skaalvik, S. Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2009, 25, 518–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alvandi, E.O. A review on meanings of emotions: Steps to a neural-informational notion of semantics. Cogn. Brain Behav. 2016, 20, 45–63. Available online: https://ehu.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://www.proquest.com/docview/1776352167?accountid=17248 (accessed on 23 December 2023).
- Oatley, K. Emotion: Theories. In Encyclopedia of Psychology; Kazdin, A.E., Ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2000; pp. 167–171. Volume 3. [Google Scholar]
- Niedenthal, P.; Krauth-Gruber, S.; Ric, R. Psychology of Emotion; Psychology Press: London, UK, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Ekman, P. Basic emotions. In Handbook of Cognition and Emotion; Dalgleish, T., Power, M., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1999; pp. 45–60. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special Edition. 2023. Available online: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/ (accessed on 23 December 2023).
- Chan, M.-K.; Sharkey, J.D.; Lawrie, S.I.; Arch, D.A.N.; Nylund-Gibson, K. Elementary school teacher well-being and supportive measures amid COVID-19: An exploratory study. Sch. Psychol. 2021, 36, 533–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Gondim, S.M.G.; Mutti, C. Affections in learning situations: A study of an entrepreneurship skills development course. J. Work. Learn. 2010, 23, 195–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rajkumar, R.P. COVID-19 and mental health: A review of the existing literature. Asian J. Psychiatry 2020, 52, 102066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Segura, M.; Arcas, M. Relacionarnos bien. Programas de Competencia Social; Narcea: Madrid, Spain, 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Bakker, A.B.; Demerouti, E. The job demands-resources model: State of the art. J. Manag. Psychol. 2007, 22, 309–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mansfield, C.F.; Beltman, S.; Price, A.; McConney, A. “Don’t sweat the small stuff”: Understanding teacher resilience at the chalkface. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2012, 28, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uluyol, C.; Sahin, S.C.; Uluyol, S. Sahin Elementary School Teachers’ ICT Use in the Classroom and Their Motivators for Using ICT. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 2016, 27, 66–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Freudenberger, H.J. Staff Burn-Out. J. Soc. Issues 1974, 30, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, L.E.; Jörg, V.; Klassen, R.M. A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Teacher Personality on Teacher Effectiveness and Burnout. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 2019, 31, 163–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Valverde, J.; Fernández, M.R.; Revuelta, F.I. El bienestar subjetivo ante las buenas prácticas educativas con TIC: Su influencia en profesorado innovador. Educación XX1 2013, 16, 255–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chigona, A.; Chigona, W.; Davids, Z. Educators’ Motivation on Integration of ICTs into Pedagogy: A Case of Disadvantaged Areas. South Afr. J. Educ. 2014, 34, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Besser, A.; Lotem, S.; Zeigler-Hill, V. Psychological stress and vocal symptoms among university professors in israel: Implications of the shift to online synchronous teaching during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Voice 2020, 36, 291.e9–291.e16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cornejo, R.; Quiñónez, M. Factores asociados al malestar/bienestar docente. Una investigación actual. REICE Rev. Electrónica Iberoam. Sobre Calid. Efic. Cambio En Educ. 2007, 5, 75–80. [Google Scholar]
- Marqués, A.; Lima, M.L.; Lopes, A. Fuentes de estrés, burnout y estrategias de coping en profesores portugueses. Rev. Psicol. Trab. Organ. 2005, 21, 123–143. [Google Scholar]
- Molina-Jiménez, T.; Gutiérrez-García, A.G.; Hernández-Domínguez, L.; MContreras, C. Psychosocial stress: Some clinical and experimental aspects. An. Psicol./Ann. Psychol. 2008, 24, 353–360. Available online: https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/42951 (accessed on 23 December 2023).
- Richards, K.A.R.; Hemphill, M.A.; Templin, T.J. Personal and contextual factors related to teachers’ experience with stress and burnout. Teach. Teach. 2018, 24, 768–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Becker, E.S.; Goetz, T.; Morger, V.; Ranellucci, J. The importance of teachers’ emotions and instructional behavior for their students’ emotions. An experience sampling analysis. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2014, 43, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beilock, S.L.; Gunderson, E.A.; Ramirez, G.; Levine, S.C. Female teachers’ math anxiety affects girls’ math achievement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 1860–1863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, E.M.; Evans, I.M.; Harvey, S.T. Observing Emotional Interactions Between Teachers and Students in Elementary School Classrooms. J. Res. Child. Educ. 2011, 25, 82–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Griffiths, D.; Goddard, T. An explanatory framework for understanding teachers resistance to adopting educational technology. Kybernetes 2015, 44, 1240–1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choi, B.; Jegatheeswaran, L.; Minocha, A.; Alhilani, M.; Nakhoul, M.; Mutengesa, E. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on final year medical students in the United Kingdom: A national survey. BMC Med. Educ. 2020, 20, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, W.; Yu, J.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, S.; Li, Q.; Zhang, Z. Clinical characteristics of COVID-19 in children compared with adults in Shandong Province, China. Infection 2020, 48, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Binali, H.; Wu, C.; Potdar, V. Computational approaches for emotion detection in text. In Proceedings of the 2010 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 13–16 April 2010; pp. 172–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lopatovska, I.; Arapakis, I. Theories, methods and current research on emotions in library and information science, information retrieval and human–computer interaction. Inf. Process. Manag. 2011, 47, 575–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halverson, L.R.; Graham, C.R. Learner Engagement in Blended Learning Environments: A Conceptual Framework. Online Learn. 2019, 23, 145–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, A.; Faria, L. The impact of emotional intelligence on academic achievement: A longitudinal study in Portuguese secondary. Learn. Individ. Differ. 2015, 37, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pekrun, R.; Perry, R.P. Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In International Handbook of Emotions in Education; Pekrun, R., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Eds.; Taylor & Francis: Abingdon, UK, 2014; pp. 120–141. [Google Scholar]
- Pekrun, R.; Goetz, T.; Daniels, L.M.; Stupnisky, R.H.; Perry, R.P. Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. J. Educ. Psychol. 2010, 102, 531–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pekrun, R.; Hall, N.C.; Goetz, T.; Perry, R.P. Boredom and academic achievement: Testing a model of reciprocal causation. J. Educ. Psychol. 2014, 106, 696–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ellis, P.D. The Essential Guide to Effect Sizes: Statistical Power, Meta-Analysis, and the Interpretation of Research Results; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Hedges, L.V. Distribution theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. J. Educ. Stat. 1981, 6, 107–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- MacCallum, R.C.; Browne, M.W.; Sugawara, H.M. Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol. Methods 1996, 2, 130–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McMillan, J.H.; Schumacher, S.; Baides, J.S. Investigación Educativa: Una Introducción Conceptual; Pearson: London, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Rebollo-Catalán, M.A.; García-Pérez, R.; Buzón-García, O.; Vega-Caro, L. Las emociones en el aprendizaje universitario apoyado en entornos virtuales: Diferencias según actividad de aprendizaje y motivación del alumnado. Rev. Complut. Educ. 2013, 25, 69–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Podsakoff, P.M.; MacKenzie, S.B.; Lee, J.-Y.; Podsakoff, N.P. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 2003, 88, 879–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Atkinson, R.; Flint, J. Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies. Soc. Res. Update 2001, 33, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Noy, C. Sampling Knowledge: The Hermeneutics of Snowball Sampling in Qualitative Research. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 2008, 11, 327–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- D’ancona, C. Metodología Cuantitativa: Estrategias y Técnicas de Investigación Social; Síntesis: Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1991. [Google Scholar]
- Lorenzo-Seva, U.; Ferrando, P.J. Factor 9.2: A comprehensive program for fitting exploratory and semiconfirmatory factor analysis and IRT models. Appl. Psychol. Meas. 2013, 37, 497–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Timmerman, M.E.; Lorenzo-Seva, U. Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychol. Methods 2011, 16, 209–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mîndrilă, D. Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Diagonally Weighted Least Squares (DWLS) Estimation Procedures: A Comparison of Estimation Bias with Ordinal and Multivariate Non-Normal Data. Int. J. Digit. Soc. 2010, 1, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jöreskog, K.; Sörbom, D. Lisrel 8: User’s Reference Guide; Scientific Software International: Lincolnwood, IL, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Browne, M.W.; Cudeck, R. Alternative ways of assessing fit. In Testing Structural Equation Models; Bollen, K.A., Ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1993; pp. 136–162. [Google Scholar]
- Bentler, P.M.; Bonett, D.G. Significance test and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 1980, 88, 588–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed.; Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Bakker, A.B.; de Vries, J.D. Job Demands-Resources theory and self-regulation: New explanations and remedies for job burnout. Anxiety Stress Coping 2020, 34, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chiang, M.M.; Heredia, S.A.; Santamaría, E.J. Clima organizacional y salud psicológica: Una dualidad organizacional. Dimens. Empres. 2017, 15, 63–76. [Google Scholar]
- Arquero, J.L.; Donoso, J.A. Docencia, investigación y burnout: El síndrome del quemado en profesores universitarios de Contabilidad. Rev. Contab. 2013, 16, 94–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez Fernández, M.; Clavería, M. Profesorado universitario: Estrés laboral. Factor de riesgo de salud. Enfermería Glob. 2005, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar]
- Maslach, C. Burnout: The Cost of Caring; Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
- Noh, J.-W.; Kim, K.-B.; Park, J.; Hong, J.; Kwon, Y.D. Relationship between the number of family members and stress by gender: Cross-sectional analysis of the fifth Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0184235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lemos, M.C.; Arnott, J.C.; Ardoin, N.M.; Baja, K.; Bednarek, A.T.; Dewulf, A.; Fieseler, C.; Goodrich, K.A.; Jagannathan, K.; Klenk, N.; et al. To co-produce or not to co-produce. Nat. Sustain. 2018, 1, 722–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hess, U.; Senécal, S.; Kirouac, G.; Herrera, P.; Philippot, P.; Kleck, R.E. Emotional expressivity in men and women: Stereotypes and self-perceptions. Cogn. Emot. 2000, 14, 609–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chan, D. Emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and coping among chinese prospective and inservice teachers in Hong Kong. Educ. Psychol. 2008, 28, 397–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mouton, A.; Hansenne, M.; Delcour, R.; Cloes, M. Emotional Intelligence and Self-Efficacy Among Physical Education Teachers. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 2013, 32, 342–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, H. The effect of teachers’ emotional labour on teaching satisfaction: Moderation of emotional intelligence. Teach. Teach. 2015, 21, 789–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Greenglass, E.R.; Burke, R.J.; Konarski, R. Components of Burnout, Resources, and Gender-Related Differences. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 28, 1088–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Penit, E. La Encuesta de Fecundidad de 2018. Rev. Estadística Soc. 2019, 7, 6–9. [Google Scholar]
- Gudmundsdottir, G.B.; Hatlevik, O.E. Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. Eur. J. Teach. Educ. 2017, 41, 214–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berkovich, I.; Eyal, O. Educational leaders and emotions: An international review of empirical evidence 1992–2012. Rev. Educ. Res. 2015, 85, 129–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, H.-B.; Lee, J.C.K.; Zhang, Z.-H.; Jin, Y.-L. Exploring the relationship among teachers’ emotional intelligence, emotional labor strategies and teaching satisfaction. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2013, 35, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
M | SD | Asymmetry | α of Cronbach | α If the Element Is Eliminated | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive Emotions | 18.32 | 3.87 | −0.42 | 0.804 | - |
(IT1) I am proud of the work done during the confinement. | 4.14 | 0.89 | −0.88 | 0.77 | |
(IT2) I am satisfied with the work performed during the confinement. | 3.89 | 0.95 | −0.64 | 0.74 | |
(IT3) I am confident that my work is adequate. | 3.84 | 0.94 | −0.57 | 0.74 | |
(IT4) I feel encouraged when I finish my work activity. | 3.46 | 1.28 | −0.33 | 0.82 | |
(IT5) I feel safe when I work in confinement. | 2.99 | 1.06 | 0.07 | 0.77 | |
Negative Emotions | 19.40 | 4.47 | −0.80 | 0.868 | - |
(IT6) I feel stress while teaching. | 4.12 | 1.00 | −1.07 | 0.85 | |
(IT7) My work worries me during confinement. | 4.00 | 1.01 | −0.89 | 0.86 | |
(IT8) I feel irritated doing my job in this situation. | 3.41 | 1.25 | −0.36 | 0.84 | |
(IT9) Working in this situation makes me feel frustrated. | 3.72 | 1.19 | −0.67 | 0.82 | |
(IT10) Working in this confined situation causes me general stress. | 4.14 | 1.05 | −1.17 | 0.82 | |
Total Emotions (Positive—Negative) | 1.08 | 6.79 | −0.22 | - |
Sex | N | M | SD | F | Sig | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive Emotions | ||||||
(IT1) I am proud of the work done during the confinement. | Man | 1071 | 4.11 | 0.912 | 0.14 | 0.702 |
Woman | 3475 | 4.15 | 0.881 | |||
(IT2) I am satisfied with the work performed during the confinement. | Man | 1071 | 3.86 | 0.965 | 0.92 | 0.336 |
Woman | 3475 | 3.90 | 0.942 | |||
(IT3) I am confident that my work is adequate. | Man | 1071 | 3.85 | 0.955 | 0.32 | 0.568 |
Woman | 3475 | 3.83 | 0.939 | |||
(IT4) I feel encouraged when I finish my work activity. | Man | 1071 | 3.63 | 1.214 | 17.96 | 0.000 |
Woman | 3475 | 3.42 | 1.289 | |||
(IT5) I feel safe when I work in confinement. | Man | 1071 | 3.10 | 1.094 | 9.24 | 0.002 |
Woman | 3475 | 2.97 | 1.041 | |||
Negative Emotions | ||||||
(IT6) I feel stress while teaching. | Man | 1071 | 3.86 | 1.061 | 15.30 | 0.000 |
Woman | 3475 | 4.20 | 0.961 | |||
(IT7) My work worries me during confinement. | Man | 1071 | 3.81 | 1.054 | 16.76 | 0.000 |
Woman | 3475 | 4.05 | 0.985 | |||
(IT8) I feel irritated doing my job in this situation. | Man | 1071 | 3.26 | 1.282 | 2.75 | 0.097 |
Woman | 3475 | 3.46 | 1.234 | |||
(IT9) Working in this situation makes me feel frustrated. | Man | 1071 | 3.50 | 1.243 | 21.76 | 0.000 |
Woman | 3475 | 3.79 | 1.166 | |||
(IT10) Working in this confined situation causes me general stress. | Man | 1071 | 3.82 | 1.172 | 46.94 | 0.000 |
Woman | 3475 | 4.24 | 0.990 |
Age Range | N | M | SD | F | Sig | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(IT6) I feel stress while teaching. | 21–25 | 106 | 3.87 | 1.015 | 6.226 | 0.000 |
26–30 | 440 | 3.92 | 1.034 | |||
31–35 | 522 | 4.03 | 1.077 | |||
36–40 | 670 | 4.22 | 0.925 | |||
41–50 | 651 | 4.20 | 0.958 | |||
46–50 | 665 | 4.12 | 0.941 | |||
51–55 | 697 | 4.12 | 1.018 | |||
56–60 | 705 | 4.14 | 0.991 | |||
61–70 | 133 | 4.06 | 1.057 | |||
Total | 4589 | 4.12 | 0.997 | |||
(IT7) My work worries me during confinement. | 21–25 | 106 | 3.75 | 1.005 | 3.145 | 0.003 |
26–30 | 440 | 3.93 | 0.958 | |||
31–35 | 522 | 3.96 | 1.013 | |||
36–40 | 670 | 3.98 | 1.020 | |||
41–50 | 651 | 3.99 | 1.006 | |||
46–50 | 665 | 3.88 | 1.020 | |||
51–55 | 697 | 4.03 | 1.013 | |||
56–60 | 705 | 4.12 | 0.976 | |||
61–70 | 133 | 3.94 | 1.140 | |||
Total | 4589 | 4.00 | 1.007 | |||
(IT8) I feel irritated doing my job in this situation. | 21–25 | 106 | 3.23 | 1.197 | 3.970 | 0.000 |
26–30 | 440 | 3.20 | 1.258 | |||
31–35 | 522 | 3.34 | 1.238 | |||
36–40 | 670 | 3.51 | 1.219 | |||
41–50 | 651 | 3.48 | 1.255 | |||
46–50 | 665 | 3.41 | 1.19 | |||
51–55 | 697 | 3.37 | 1.263 | |||
56–60 | 705 | 3.47 | 1.239 | |||
61–70 | 133 | 3.38 | 1.283 | |||
Total | 4589 | 3.41 | 1.249 | |||
(IT9) Working in this situation makes me feel frustrated. | 21–25 | 106 | 3.61 | 1.109 | 4.753 | 0.000 |
26–30 | 440 | 3.77 | 1.146 | |||
31–35 | 522 | 3.75 | 1.187 | |||
36–40 | 670 | 3.88 | 1.121 | |||
41–50 | 651 | 3.76 | 1.202 | |||
46–50 | 665 | 3.61 | 1.201 | |||
51–55 | 697 | 3.59 | 1.217 | |||
56–60 | 705 | 3.67 | 1.213 | |||
61–70 | 133 | 3.44 | 1.269 | |||
Total | 4589 | 3.72 | 1.191 | |||
(IT10) Working in this confined situation causes me general stress. | 21–25 | 106 | 3.91 | 1.100 | 4.917 | 0.000 |
26–30 | 440 | 4.00 | 1.094 | |||
31–35 | 522 | 4.06 | 1.100 | |||
36–40 | 670 | 4.25 | 0.983 | |||
41–50 | 651 | 4.22 | 1.004 | |||
46–50 | 665 | 1.19 | 0.992 | |||
51–55 | 697 | 4.10 | 1.077 | |||
56–60 | 705 | 4.14 | 1.067 | |||
61–70 | 133 | 3.98 | 1.128 | |||
Total | 4589 | 4.14 | 1.051 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Garitano, E.T.; Portillo Berasaluce, J.; de la Serna, A.L.; Arce Alonso, A. Emotions of Educators Conducting Emergency Remote Teaching during COVID-19 Confinement. Sustainability 2024, 16, 1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041456
Garitano ET, Portillo Berasaluce J, de la Serna AL, Arce Alonso A. Emotions of Educators Conducting Emergency Remote Teaching during COVID-19 Confinement. Sustainability. 2024; 16(4):1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041456
Chicago/Turabian StyleGaritano, Eneko Tejada, Javier Portillo Berasaluce, Arantzazu López de la Serna, and Ander Arce Alonso. 2024. "Emotions of Educators Conducting Emergency Remote Teaching during COVID-19 Confinement" Sustainability 16, no. 4: 1456. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041456