Next Article in Journal
Geotourism, a New Perspective of Post-COVID-19-Pandemic Relaunch through Travel Agencies—Case Study: Bucegi Natural Park, Romania
Previous Article in Journal
Optimizing Ventilation Systems for Sustainable Office Buildings: Long-Term Monitoring and Environmental Impact Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structure of Sustainable Management of Geoparks through Multi-Criteria Methods

1
Department of Geo and Mining Tourism, Institute of Earth Resources, Faculty of Mining, Ecology, Process Control and Geotechnologies, Technical University of Košice, 04200 Košice, Slovakia
2
Department of Geography and Geology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University in Banská Bystrica, 97401 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia
3
Department of Geography and Applied Geoinformatics, Faculty of Humanities and Natural Sciences, University of Prešov, 08116 Prešov, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(3), 983; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030983
Submission received: 13 October 2023 / Revised: 29 November 2023 / Accepted: 18 January 2024 / Published: 23 January 2024

Abstract

Geoparks, as a modern product of geotourism and territorial management, currently represent a new way of protecting and preserving geoheritage, which is closely related to knowledge and education. They increase general awareness of the value of the Earth and, on the other hand, represent the support and development of the territory. The fulfillment of geopark goals, together with their purpose and activities, emphasizes the need for an effective management structure and function of the whole. This research aimed at clarifying the management issues of geoparks, and defined management areas derived from essential geopark functions. Based on determining management areas and their specifics, the task is to define a suitable management structure applicable in geoparks, representing a supporting link in creating plans and management methods. The task involves a multi-criteria decision-making method to define an appropriate management structure for the geopark. This method helped to define three key areas of management, such as marketing management, cooperation management and, last but not least, destination management. Of course, this does not mean that other areas of management are not important, as they represent an inseparable support structure in management. The usability of the results of this article can serve as support in the creation of management plans, and also indicates priorities in deciding which way to proceed in the management of geoparks as specific entities.
Keywords: geotourism; geopark; management; effectivity; management structure; multi-criterial methods geotourism; geopark; management; effectivity; management structure; multi-criterial methods

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kornecká, E.; Molokáč, M.; Gregorová, B.; Čech, V.; Hronček, P.; Javorská, M. Structure of Sustainable Management of Geoparks through Multi-Criteria Methods. Sustainability 2024, 16, 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030983

AMA Style

Kornecká E, Molokáč M, Gregorová B, Čech V, Hronček P, Javorská M. Structure of Sustainable Management of Geoparks through Multi-Criteria Methods. Sustainability. 2024; 16(3):983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030983

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kornecká, Enikő, Mário Molokáč, Bohuslava Gregorová, Vladimír Čech, Pavel Hronček, and Miriama Javorská. 2024. "Structure of Sustainable Management of Geoparks through Multi-Criteria Methods" Sustainability 16, no. 3: 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030983

APA Style

Kornecká, E., Molokáč, M., Gregorová, B., Čech, V., Hronček, P., & Javorská, M. (2024). Structure of Sustainable Management of Geoparks through Multi-Criteria Methods. Sustainability, 16(3), 983. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16030983

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop