Next Article in Journal
Perspectives on Drivers of Biodiversity and Environmental Changes in the Keta Lagoon Ramsar Site of Ghana
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Destructive Analysis Using Near-Infrared Spectroscopy to Predict Albumin, Globulin, Glutelin, and Total Protein Content in Sunflower Seeds
Previous Article in Journal
Implementation of Integrated Life Cycle Design Principles in Ground Improvement and Piling Methods—A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Impact of Purchasing New Agricultural Machinery on Fuel Consumption on Farms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Study of the Sustainability of Ecological and Chemical Indicators of Soils in Organic Farming

by
Vladimir Ivanovich Trukhachev
,
Sergey Leonidovich Belopukhov
,
Marina Grigoryeva
* and
Inna Ivanovna Dmitrevskaya
Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, Russian State Agrarian University, 127343 Moscow, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(2), 665; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020665
Submission received: 8 December 2023 / Revised: 7 January 2024 / Accepted: 9 January 2024 / Published: 12 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Technology in Agricultural Engineering)

Abstract

:
Organic farming is often seen as a sustainable alternative to intensive agricultural systems. The studies conducted in this direction analyze various factors, as well as their assemblies, and show contradictory results. In order to assess the impact of the organic method of soil cultivation on the stable composition of the most important mineral and organic substances in the production process, the organic agriculture procedure was implemented with an agrochemical analysis for 12 years. The content of mobile phosphorus, exchangeable potassium, and humus in the soil was determined. An elemental analysis of soil samples was conducted for a more in-depth analysis of its composition. It was established that the soils of the farm contained a sufficient amount of exchangeable potassium and humus. The content of these components remained stable during the study period. It was discovered that the soils of the farm have a low content of mobile phosphorus, which also remained stable during the study period. In the studied farm, the applied farming technologies contribute to the stable content of the main nutrient components of the soil. But to correct the content of mobile forms of phosphorus, additional agrotechnical measures are required.

1. Introduction

Organic farming is an intensively developing area of agricultural production that arose in response to serious problems caused by the development of a modern agroindustrial complex, the depletion of arable land, and the large-scale use of agrochemicals. This was a consequence of the emergence of environmental problems in farmlands and territories adjacent to them. Those problems lead to a decrease in the nutritional value of agricultural products and an increase in allergic and other diseases among the population. Organic farming’s objective is to provide the population with high-quality and safe agricultural products and preserve the environmental conditions of agrocenoses and adjacent territories. Organic farming is being developed in many countries around the world and is often seen as a sustainable alternative to intensive agricultural systems.
Organic farming is considered a way to achieve sustainability in a combination of environmental, economic, social, and other factors. Researchers answering the question of whether organic farming is sustainable study various indicators and their complexities. The most common idea is that an organic farming system should aid in maintaining a sufficient level of soil fertility for economical crop production in the long term, as well as protecting the environment so as to be considered sustainable [1,2]. To assess the ability of organic farming to be sustainable, some researchers analyze economic indicators [3], such as household income [4] and social factors [5]. Significant indicators are crop yields [6] and product quality [6,7]. The comparison of stability in the application of organic and inorganic fertilizers is considered in [8,9,10,11,12]. Multifactorial meta-studies are also used [6,13,14], where various indicators are analyzed in a complex. The methods of a comprehensive assessment of the environmental safety of organic agriculture are proposed in [15]. It is also important to remember that one of the most important criteria for assessing the sustainability of the farming system is the preservation of soil fertility [1,2,13,16,17,18,19,20].
Soil stability is one of the main indicators of sustainability in organic farming [21]. It determines the yield and economic efficiency of the farm. Moreover, it is related to the environmental sustainability of the farm territory.
It is rather useful to know what soil characteristics are being studied by scientists to assess the sustainability of organic farming. Fließbach et al. [22] investigated microbial biomass and soil fractions by measuring size and density. As a result, it was discovered that the soils of organic and traditional agricultural systems differ in these indicators. The physical properties of soil samples in organic and traditional agriculture are considered in studies such as [19]. Leifeld, J., who tried to answer the question about the sustainability of organic farming, studied the dynamics of organic matter content in soil [13]. Nitrogen availability and carbon content in soil microbial biomass are considered in [7]. Gosling et al. analyzed the content of the total organic matter, nitrogen, extracted potassium, and phosphorus in the soil and the ratio C:N [1]. Gattinger et al. studied the carbon content in the upper soil layer and discovered that its accumulation occurs in organic farming [16]. Anglade et al. reported on the study of the nitrate content in the surface layer of the soil [23].
It is generally accepted that soil parameters such as pH, electrical conductivity, organic carbon content, total nitrogen, available forms of phosphorus, and potassium are mostly studied during the analysis [17,18]. In some cases, the list of studied indicators is wider. For instance, in the study [20], in addition to those listed, the total sorption capacity of soils, the content of Mg, and microelements (B, Cu, Mn, and Zn) were analyzed. Thus, soil analysis is used to assess the balance of nutrients in the soil, organic matter, mobile forms of potassium, phosphorus, nitrogen, sulfur, and other macro- and microelements, as well as to prove the absence of undesirable impurities and toxic substances.
To analyze the stability of soil fertility in organic farming, it is important to consider the applied agricultural technologies, especially fertilizers. The impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on soil conditions has been compared in many countries (India, Poland, Spain, Italy, USA, and many others) on various soils [9,10,11,12,24,25]. Fan et al. [26] showed that the application of organic fertilizers, compared with the use of completely chemical fertilizers, allows increasing productivity by 3.48%, the content of the organic component—by 24.43%, total nitrogen—by 32.79%, total phosphorus—by 23.97%, total potassium—by 44.91%, mobile phosphorus—by 14.46%, mobile potassium—by 16.21%, soil bacteria—by 5.94%, ureases—by 22.32%, and catalases—by 17.68%. Consequently, the use of organic fertilizers instead of chemical ones makes it possible to improve the agroecological characteristics of the soil. In a study by Elkhlifi et al. [27], when conducting scientific research on changes in the humus content in the soil before and after adding an organic component, it was noted that this indicator increased significantly. Similar results are given in the article by Dr. Lina Marija Butkevičienė [28]. According to the data obtained by her, the humus content in the soil remained fairly stable or decreased slightly with the preservation of haulm and the use of single-component organic biostimulants Azofix, Ruinex, and Penergetic. On the contrary, when continuous straw application was combined with two- or three-component mixtures of these biological products or with compensatory nitrogen, the humus content increased. Compared with the initial state, this characteristic increased by 1.4–12.8% due to the complication of the formation conditions of microbiological biodiversity. Thus, previous studies show that there are effective organic farming technologies that contribute to improving soil conditions in certain territories. However, other researchers doubt the possibility of organic farming being sustainable and maintaining the balance of nutrients in the soil in the long term [29].
Considering climatic conditions and soil types is important for the analysis of the stability of soil fertility in organic farming. Therefore, experiments with a wide range of geographical features and different agricultural crops are important. The data from scientific experiments with tomatoes, potatoes, rice, corn, carrots, and other agricultural crops are presented. Studies have been conducted in European countries [1,4,14,17,22,25,30], in the Asian region [2,7,8,9,10,11], and in other parts of the world.
To characterize the stability of the system, the most important condition is long-term observation. The majority of previous studies analyze changes in soil parameters when using organic farming from 4 [20] to 15 years [1].
Due to the different opinions of the scientists, it is essential to see the conclusions made regarding the ability of organic farming to be sustainable, which are still conflicting. Connor, D. J., substantiates the point of view that organic farming will not be able to provide the world with food in the necessary quantities [31]. Leifeld, J., is doubtful about the statement about the general sustainable use of soil resources in organic farming systems [13]. Anup Das et al., on the contrary, insist on several advantages of organic farming for sustainable productivity and improvement in soil and product quality in the conditions of the eastern Himalayas [7]. Gamage et al., based on research and arguments, claim that sustainable agriculture should provide enough products, as well as reduce the negative impact on the environment, and allow farmers to make a profit [32]. There are conclusions about certain conditions or restrictions regulating the use of organic farming that remain sustainable. For example, in a study by Gosling et al. it is indicated that changes in organic management methods are necessary to increase the addition of potassium and phosphorus and avoid a decrease in soil fertility in the long term [1]. There are reports on the use of integrated farming systems that combine traditional and ecological farming systems in order to increase sustainability [33]. Niemiec, M., and co-authors report that organic farming can contribute to improving the physico-chemical, chemical, and biological properties of soils [17]. A meta-analysis of European studies by Tuomisto et al. [14] shows that organic farming can be considered as a way to increase sustainability in agriculture.
Since there is no definite answer to the question yet, it is sensible to continue research in this area. Undoubtedly, soil stability in organic farming with applied agricultural technologies should be considered in relation to their experience with soil and climatic conditions and cultivated crops. Therefore, for an objective assessment of soil stability in organic farming, it is very important to consider this issue in different territories with different types of soils and used agricultural technologies. Moreover, it is a necessary subject to a long-term experiment.
Such a large territory as Russia, with its diverse soil and climatic conditions, remains poorly studied in matters of organic farming, especially in long-term projections [34]. The main document defining the development of organic agriculture in Russia, Federal Law №. 280 “On Organic Products and on Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of the Russian Federation”, came into force in January 2020. Before that, there was no legislative or regulatory framework for the use of pesticides and agrochemicals, and there were no Russian standards for the quality of organic agricultural products. The adopted law and standards determined the official status of organic agriculture in Russia and stimulated its active development. In 2023, about 200 organic producers have already been accredited. To assess the sustainability of the organic farming system, it seems useful to analyze the soil indicators of one of the major agricultural producers implementing the ideas of organic farming over a long period (in some fields for 25 years and in most fields for 12 years).
Our study is a contribution to the study of the impact of long-term organic farming on agrochemical soil parameters. In addition to the traditionally studied soil parameters (soil organic matter, mobile phosphorus, exchangeable potassium, and pH), the data of the elemental analysis of the soil are considered.
The aim of this study is to assess the spatial variation in soil properties based on the analysis of their chemical composition, as well as the impact of long-term use of the organic cultivation method on the soil quality of an agricultural enterprise operating using organic farming technology for 12 years.
In accordance with the aims of the study, the following tasks were set: analysis of the content of exchangeable potassium, analysis of the content of mobile phosphorus, analysis of the content of soil organic matter, elemental analysis of soil samples, interpretation of the analysis results and creation of recommendations based on them, and comparison of the analysis results obtained in 2021 with the results of 2019 and 2017 in order to assess the long-term the effects of the organic method of cultivation on soil fertility.

2. Materials and Methods

The object of this study is the soil of the fields of an agricultural enterprise that has worked on the principles of organic farming for more than 12 years. The climate of the area is temperate. The climate zone is steppe. The soils are mainly carbonate black soils. Cereal grains (mainly winter wheat) and essential oil crops (lavender and sage) are grown in the fields (Figure 1).
The basis of the crop nutrition system of the studied farm is the natural fertility of the land. The improvement in soil structure and the impact on changes in agrochemical parameters, primarily associated with the transfer of phosphorus to an accessible state, is carried out by adding organic residues using stubble destructors and immediately embedding them in the soil. In addition, leaf feeding is practiced during the growth period of plants with preparations approved by the certification organization “Organic”.
Observations, analyses, and records were performed according to generally accepted methods of field and laboratory research in soil science [35] and Russian state standards (26205, 26213-84). The analysis of soil samples was conducted at the Educational and Scientific Center for Collective Use “Service Laboratory for Complex Analysis of Chemical Compounds” of the Russian State Agricultural Academy named after K.A. Timiryazev. The analysis of the content of exchangeable potassium and phosphorus was conducted in accordance with the Russian state standard 26205 [36]. The method is based on the extraction of mobile phosphorus and potassium compounds from the soil with a 1% solution of ammonium carbonate and subsequent determination of phosphorus via spectrophotometry using a two-beam spectrophotometer of the UV-1900i brand (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan), and determination of potassium via flame photometry.
The amounts of soil organic matter were determined in compliance with the Russian state standard 26213-84 [37] using the oxidative method with potassium dichromate in an acidic medium and subsequent measurement via spectrophotometry using a UV-1900i dual-beam spectrophotometer. The determination was made in soil samples from genetic horizons, which were immediately stored in air-tight and waterproof apparatus with sizes 3–1 mm, 1–0.5 mm, and 0.5–0.25 mm.
Electron microscopy studies of samples were conducted on a COXEM EM-30AX PLUS scanning electron microscope (COXEM Co., Ltd., Daejeon, Korea). The electron source was an electron gun with a thermionic emission type, SE detectors (to obtain an image with information about surface morphology), BSE (to obtain an image with information about composition variations based on contrast measured by atomic number), and EDS (for elemental analysis of the composition of samples). For spectral analysis of samples, spectra in the near-infrared region were taken using a SpectraStar 2600XT-R analyzer (VIKOMP, Moscow, Russia) with an In-Ga-As infrared radiation receiver and a base of reference standards; the spectra were processed using the InfoStart software package.
The elemental analysis was performed on a double-beam atomic absorption spectrometer AA-7000 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan). The metal content was determined via atomic adsorption spectrometry (AAS) with electrothermal and flame atomization (Cu, Zn, Co, Ni, and Pb). The pH was determined using the potentiometric method in an extract of 1.0 M KCl and H2O. The experimental data were processed via mathematical statistics methods using Microsoft Office Excel and STATISTICA 6.0 software tools. The correlation dependence was evaluated according to the Fisher test.

3. Results

Based on the soil studies conducted in 2017–2021 to determine the concentrations of mobile phosphorus (Figure 2) and potassium (Figure 3), it was found that 80% of the soils of the farm fields have very low and low contents of mobile phosphorus (Figure 2), with a sufficiently high content of potassium (Figure 3).

3.1. Analysis of Mobile Phosphorus in Soils of the Studied Fields in 2017

We presented the results of the agrochemical analysis of the soils of the studied fields, which were obtained in 2017. It was claimed that of 423.6 ha of the explored areas, 100.8 ha (or 23.8%) has a content of mobile phosphates up to 11 mg/kg of soil; 236.3 ha (or 55.8%)—11–15 mg/kg of soil; 71.8 (or 17.0%)—16–30 mg/kg of soil; 3.0 ha (or 0.7%)—31–45 mg/kg of soil; 5.7 ha (or 1.3%)—46–60 mg/kg of soil; and 6 ha (or 1.4%)—more than 60 mg/kg of soil. The average value of mobile phosphorus is only 15 mg/kg of soil.

3.2. Analysis of Mobile Phosphorus in Soils of the Studied Fields in 2019

Considering the fact that the content of mobile forms of phosphorus calculated at P2O5 mg/kg of soil is accepted as very low at concentrations <10, low at 10–15, medium at 15–30, elevated at 30–45, high at 45–60, and very high at >60, according to the results of the conducted research in the fields, the content of mobile phosphorus is very low. Thus, on field № 4, where wheat is grown using organic farming technology, the concentration of mobile phosphorus in the soil is 7.5 mg/kg of soil, whereas in the field where traditional technology is used (field № 21), the concentration of mobile phosphorous is 4 mg/kg of soil. In fields № 175 and № 179, where lavender has been grown for 25 years, the content of mobile phosphorus is 6.5 and 7.5 mg/kg, respectively. For fields № 1 and № 100/2 with lavender grown since 2005, the phosphorus content is 1.5 and 2.0 mg/kg of soil, respectively.

3.3. Analysis of Mobile Phosphorus in Soils of the Studied Fields in 2021

As an example, the results of the determination of the mobile phosphorus concentration in field № 38 are presented below (Figure 4).
It should be noted that the minimum value for mobile phosphate in soil samples from the farm fields was 1 mg/kg and the maximum value was 31 mg/kg, which confirms our 2019 and 2017 data indicating low content of mobile phosphorus in soil samples.
The results of the measurements of the mobile phosphorus content in the soils of the farm for the study period (2017–2021) are summarized in Table 1. Graduation was carried out in accordance with the following boundaries: very low—less than 1.0 mg/100 g; low—1.0–1.5 mg/100 g; medium—1.5–3.0 mg/100 g; increased—3.0–4.5 mg/100 g; high—4.5–6.0 mg/100 g; and very high—more than 6.0 mg/100 g.
Factor variance:
S f 2 = S f p 1 = 0 3 1 = 0
Residual variance:
s ost 2   = S o s t p ( q 1 ) = 6932.38 3 ( 6 1 ) = 462.16
The value of the factor dispersion is less than the value of the residual dispersion; hence, there were no significant changes in the content of mobile phosphorus during the study period.
Thus, the soils of the studied fields have a very low content of mobile phosphorus, less than 10 mg/kg. From 2017 to 2021, despite the ongoing agricultural activities directed to phosphorus replenishment, there were no statistically significant changes. In some fields, there is a slight tendency toward a decrease in mobile phosphorus.

3.4. Analysis of Exchangeable Potassium in Soils in 2017

The results of the research in 2017 showed that of 423.6 ha of explored areas, 47.1 ha (or 11.1%) have exchangeable potassium content at 101–200 mg/kg of soil; 316.9 ha (or 74.8%)—201-300 mg/kg of soil; 44.9 (or 10.6%)—301–400 mg/kg of soil; 3.0 ha (or 0.7%)—401–600 mg/kg of soil; and 11.7 ha (or 2.8%)—more than 600 mg/kg of soil. The average value of exchangeable potassium content is 274 mg/kg of soil, the minimum value is 195 mg/kg of soil, and the maximum value is 322 mg/kg of soil.

3.5. Analysis of Exchangeable Potassium in Soils in 2019

The research and chemical analysis of exchangeable potassium in soils in 2019 confirmed the results of 2017. The content of exchangeable potassium in soils from the calculation of K2O mg/kg of soil is considered very low at a concentration < 55, low—at 55–100; medium—at 100–200; increased—at 200–300; high—at 300–400; and very high—at >400. According to the results of the conducted research on the fields, the content of exchangeable potassium is medium and increased.

3.6. Analysis of Exchangeable Potassium in Soils in 2021

The 2019 conclusions were confirmed by the 2021 results. As an example, Figure 5 presents data on the content of exchangeable potassium (mg/kg) in the soil of field № 38.
The minimum value of this indicator for field № 38 is 215 mg/kg, and the maximum value is 335 mg/kg.
The results of the analysis of the content of exchangeable potassium are summarized in Table 2. The statistical calculations are presented below. Gradation into groups: very low—less than 5.5 mg/100 g; low—5.5–100 mg/100 g; medium—10.0–20.0 mg/100 g; increased—20.0–30.0 mg/100 g; high—30.0–40.0 mg/100 g; and very high content of 40.0 mg/100 g.
Factor variance:
S f 2   = S f p 1   =   3.41   ×   10 13
Residual variance:
s ost 2   = S o s t p ( q 1 ) = 12287.76 3 ( 6 1 )   =   819.18
The value of the factor dispersion is less than the value of the residual dispersion. Hence it was reliably established that there were no significant changes in the content of exchangeable potassium in the soils of the enterprise during the study period.
Thus, there is a sufficient content of exchangeable potassium in the soils in the studied fields. From 2017 to 2021, there are no trends toward a decrease in the potassium content in the soil in the studied fields.

3.7. Analysis of Organic Matter (Humus) Content in Soils in 2017

Last but not least, it is important to focus on another one of the main indicators in the assessment of soils—the content of organic matter. In 2017, it was found that of 423.6 hectares of explored areas on the content of organic matter, all of them have an organic matter concentration of more than 4.0%. The average value is 4.47%; the minimum value is 4.09%; and the maximum value is 5.64%.

3.8. Analysis of Organic Matter (Humus) Content in Soils in 2019

In the fields explored in 2019, we determined that the concentration of organic matter is 4.65 ± 0.34%. These data correlate with previously conducted studies, and soil fertility, determined by measuring organic matter concentration, has not decreased over the years.

3.9. Analysis of Organic Matter (Humus) Content in Soils in 2021

In 2021, our tests established organic matter concentrations for all organic farm fields. As an example, Figure 6 shows the results for field № 38 (%).
It should be noted that for this field the indicator for organic matter content varies, as can be seen from the map. There are areas with humus content of more than 6%. On average, this indicator is 4.71 ± 0.32%.
The results of the analysis of the humus content for the study period are summarized in Table 3. The distribution of data was carried out according to the following gradation: very low—less 2.0%; low—2.1–3.0%; medium—3.1–4.0%; increased—4.1–5.0%; high—5.1–6.0%; and very high >6.0%.
Factor variance:
S f 2 = S f p 1 = 41.67 3 1 = 20.83
Residual variance:
s ost 2   = S o s t n p = 4747.91 16 3 = 365.22
The value of the factor dispersion is less than the value of the residual dispersion; therefore, it can be concluded that there were no significant changes in the amount of organic matter during the study period.
Thus, based on soil studies conducted in 2017, 2019, and 2021 to determine the content of organic matter, it was claimed that the content of organic matter has not decreased. Therefore, it can be concluded that organic agrotechnologies used in organic farming agriculture do not deplete the reserves of organic matter in the soil.

3.10. Determination of pH of Soils of an Agricultural Enterprise

In 2019–2021 soil samples of different fields, it was found that their pH was in the range of 7.4–8.65. Thus, the soils of all studied fields have slightly alkaline reactions in the environment.

3.11. Investigation of Elemental Composition of Soil Samples

Figure 7 shows the results of the elemental analysis of soil samples from field № 63 (fraction less than 0.5 mm).
As noted earlier, the soil contains high concentrations of potassium that is quite easily transformed into exchangeable form. Concentrations greater than 0.1% contain non-metals—carbon, oxygen, and silicon, which are incorporated into silicates or silicon dioxide, carbonates, and metal oxides.
Figure 8 shows a distribution map of calcium and aluminum in the same field, and Figure 9 shows iron and titanium.
Among the metals in concentrations of more than 0.1% are manganese, titanium, magnesium, potassium, aluminum, iron, and calcium; high concentrations of these and other metals can determine the alkaline reaction of the soil.
It should also be noted that in large fractions of soil particles of 1–2 and 2–7 mm in size, the main component is calcium carbonate, as it follows from Figure 10. The ratio between oxygen, carbon, and calcium definitely indicates the presence of calcium carbonate.
It is important to emphasize that the obtained data confirm the fact that the application of organic farming technology affects the content of macro- and microelements in the soil. Comparative elemental analysis of samples of the same particle size shows that the concentration of carbon (included in the organic matter, not in the composition of carbonates) is 2–3 times higher in the “organic” technology than in traditional cultivation. At the same time, the concentration of silicon is 2.5 times lower in the “organic” technology, calcium is 1.5 times lower, and iron and aluminum are 1.7 times lower than in traditional technologies.
These results are confirmed if we analyze the mineral component of soil after annealing at 950 °C. The results of the elemental analysis of soil after the deletion of organic components via incineration are presented in Figure 11.
As it follows from the microphotographs of Figure 11 and the correlation between chemical elements, the mineral part of the soil is represented by carbonates, silicates of calcium, iron, aluminum, magnesium, sodium, chromium, titanium, and their oxides. These results draw attention to the fact that the mineral part has a low content of phosphorus and sulfur.
Thus, soils of the studied fields are represented by a variety of chemical elements, with a predominance of carbonates and silicates (silicon oxide), but an insufficiently balanced composition, especially for phosphorus and sulfur. To optimize the ratios and contents of components in the soil, it is necessary to carry out appropriate agrochemical measures.

4. Discussion

4.1. Differences from Previous Studies

Our study was conducted in Russia, where there are not many similar studies, so as to contribute to the study of the possibility of organic farming providing soil stability. The soil analysis was conducted in the territory of an agricultural enterprise using organic farming for at least 12 years (25 years in some fields). To assess the nutrient balance, a chemical analysis of soils was conducted for the content of mobile forms of phosphorus, exchangeable potassium, soil organic matter, and pH. An elemental analysis of the soil was performed, which allowed us to better understand the chemical composition of these soils and the specifics of the processes occurring in them. The results of our research indicate that the applied organic farming system allows us to maintain the initial balance of nutrients in the soil. The results of monitoring the main indicators of soil fertility for 5 years show nutrient stability in the conditions of organic cultivation technology. But if the soils are poor in any component, the use of targeted agrotechnical measures is required.
Our results correlate with the data obtained by researchers at the Rodale Institute in PA, USA, comparing organic and traditional farming systems in field trials since 1981. Their research shows that organic systems, as a rule, give an equal harvest and improve soil quality compared with traditional systems [38]. Kwiatkowski et al. also conclude that organic farming has a positive effect on soil conditions [20]. A meta-analysis of European studies performed by Tuomisto et al. also shows that organic farming can be considered as a way to increase sustainability in agriculture [14].
Nevertheless, there are directly opposite research conclusions. A study by Niemiec et al. showed that organic farming led to soil degradation [17]. However, it should be noted that the experiment was conducted on soils with high anthropogenic impact, in which the degradation process may have already begun. Therefore, it seems important to note that the success of organic farming depends on the initial state of the soil and the compliance of the applied agricultural technologies. Some researchers have expressed doubts about the fundamental ability of organic farming to be self-sufficient and fulfill the law of return of substances (especially with regard to phosphorus). Researchers [13,29,31] are convinced that the gradual depletion of soils is a result of the use of organic technology in their cultivation. According to the experience of many enterprises that have switched to organic farming, the yield of agricultural enterprises implementing the principles of organic farming is usually significantly lower in the first five years than where traditional agriculture is used [21]. However, after a competent selection of varieties, schemes, and doses of natural top dressing, crop yields and product quality turn out to be at the same level as traditional agriculture [39]. Our experience shows the need for comprehensive monitoring studies of soils for an objective assessment of their condition and the correct selection of organic agrotechnologies so we can be more confident in the sustainability of organic farming.

4.2. The Implications of this Study

As noted earlier, the main problem in the fields of the agricultural enterprise under study remains the critically low concentration of mobile phosphorus. As the results of the analysis showed, the application of nitrogen- and phosphorus-fixing bacteria did not provide significant results due to the low moisture content in the soils at the time of their application. Therefore, it is recommended to use biological fertilizers immediately after rains in the future, as well as new drugs based on the sorption of phosphates on organic residues of lavender biomass. It is also helpful to use fishmeal from regional enterprises allowed in organic farming.
The basis of the crop nutrition system of the studied farm is the natural fertility of the land. The improvement in soil structure and the impact on changes in agrochemical parameters, primarily associated with the transfer of phosphorus to an accessible state, is carried out by adding organic residues using stubble destructors and immediately embedding them in the soil. In addition, foliar feeding is recommended during the growth period of plants with preparations approved by the certification organization “Organic”.
In addition to the methods mentioned above, it is necessary to provide a set of measures to saturate the soil with phosphorus. The following is recommended: use saturation (sorption) with soluble phosphates of organic biomass, which is obtained after distillation of lavender and sage essential oil (as an organic sorbent); use the resources of fish processing enterprises located in the region, for example, fishmeal; and use bird droppings having an acidic reaction to transfer insoluble phosphorus from soils to a soluble state. We are certain that such measures will prevent phosphorus depletion of soils under conditions of using organic cultivation technology.
An important consequence of our work is the fact that this and many similar studies are used in the educational process of students of the Russian State Agrarian University. The study was conducted with the participation of students in the master’s program, “Chemical-toxicological and microbiological analysis of objects of the agricultural sphere”, in the direction of “Agrochemistry and agricultural soil science”. To overcome the problems associated with the chemicalization of agriculture and intensive use of resources and to switch to a sustainable way of production, attention should be paid to the education of future specialists in this industry, including their research competence formed on the basis of the concept of sustainable development [40,41].

5. Conclusions

Soil samples were analyzed on carbonate black soils of the farm during the assessment of soil fertility based on the following parameters: pH, humus, exchangeable potassium, mobile phosphorus, and macro- and microelements. Soil maps of fields were compiled. It is noted that the humus content in the fields of the farm is quite high—up to 4.5%. Additionally, long-term studies show that with the organic method of cultivating the land, this indicator does not decrease. This indicates the beneficial impact of organic farming on the content of organic matter in the soil. For all fields, the pH indicator has a slightly alkaline reaction. The metals present in concentrations of more than 0.1% are manganese, titanium, magnesium, potassium, aluminum, iron, and calcium; high concentrations of these metals can determine the alkaline reaction.
The main problem that the farm needs to solve in terms of mineral composition is that the soils have a very low content of mobile phosphorus. From 2017 to 2021, no significant changes in the content of mobile phosphorus were found. The replenishment of phosphorus in the composition of soils is recommended. Studies of the content of exchangeable potassium in soils have shown that its concentration is characterized as medium in the fields of the farm. There is no downward trend during the study period.
This study made it possible to continue monitoring the state of the ecological and chemical indicators of the soils of an agricultural enterprise in order to assess the impact of the organic farming method on soil fertility. The low phosphorus content in the fields of the farm was confirmed and no significant changes were found during the study period. A number of recommendations are given for replenishing the phosphorus content that are suitable for organic farming standards. According to other indicators, it was found that there were no deficiencies in substances or trends toward their decrease, which makes it possible to consider that the applied agrotechnologies provide replenishment of the mineral and organic matter of soils.
We plan to continue exploring the ability of organic farming agrotechnologies to be sustainable. To undertake this, we will continue monitoring the chemical and ecological indicators of the soils of this farm in order to study the effect of organic cultivation technology on the ability of soils to self-heal and replenish minerals and organic substances. In addition, further attention should be paid to assessing the impact of the effects of the application of organic farming technology recommended to farms of agricultural enterprises.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.L.B.; methodology, M.G.; software, S.L.B. and I.I.D.; validation, M.G. and I.I.D.; formal analysis, S.L.B.; investigation, M.G.; resources, I.I.D. and M.G.; data curation, I.I.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.G.; writing—review and editing, M.G.; visualization, M.G.; supervision, S.L.B. and V.I.T.; project administration, V.I.T. and I.I.D.; and funding acquisition, V.I.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The article was produced with the support of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation in accordance with agreement № 075-15-2022-317, dated 20 April 2022, which provided a grant in the form of subsidies from the Federal budget of the Russian Federation. The grant was provided for state support for the creation and development of a Word class Scientific Center “Agrotechnologies for the Future”.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Gosling, P.; Shepherd, M. Long-term changes in soil fertility in organic arable farming systems in England, with particular reference to phosphorus and potassium. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2005, 105, 425–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yadav, S.K.; Babu, S.; Yadav, M.K.; Singh, K.; Yadav, G.S.; Pal, S. A Review of Organic Farming for Sustainable Agriculture in Northern India. Int. J. Agron. 2013, 2013, 718145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Reddy, B.S. Organic farming: Status, issues and prospects—A review. Agric. Econ. Res. Rev. 2010, 23, 343–358. Available online: https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:aerrae:97015 (accessed on 18 November 2023).
  4. Berentsen, P.; van Asseldonk, M. An empirical analysis of risk in conventional and organic arable farming in The Netherlands. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 79, 100–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sapbamrer, R.; Thammachai, A. A Systematic Review of Factors Influencing Farmers’ Adoption of Organic Farming. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Seufert, V.; Ramankutty, N.; Foley, J.A. Comparing the yields of organic and conventional agriculture. Nature 2012, 485, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Das, A.; Patel, D.; Kumar, M.; Ramkrushna, G.; Mukherjee, A.; Layek, J.; Ngachan, S.; Buragohain, J. Impact of seven years of organic farming on soil and produce quality and crop yields in eastern Himalayas, India. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2017, 236, 142–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bhattacharyya, R.; Kundu, S.; Prakash, V.; Gupta, H. Sustainability under combined application of mineral and organic fertilizers in a rainfed soybean–wheat system of the Indian Himalayas. Eur. J. Agron. 2008, 28, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Subehia, S.K.; Sepehya, S.; Rana, S.S.; Negi, S.C.; Sharma, S.K. Long-term effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on rice (Oryza sativa L.)–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield, and chemical properties of an acidic soil in the western Himalayas. Exp. Agric. 2013, 49, 382–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Joshi, H.; Joshi, B.; Guru, S.K.; Shankdhar, S.C.; Kumar, A.; Mahapatra, B.S.; Nautiyal, M.K.; Singh, P. Consequences of integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers on yield and yield elements of rice. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2017, 7, 163–166. [Google Scholar]
  11. Khadayate, M.K.; Sharma, G.K.; Verma, S.; Kumar, S.; Bajpayee, R.K. Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on rice yield, yield attributing parameters, content and uptake of nutrients in alfisols of Chhattisgarh. Plant Arch. 2005, 5, 645–648. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328314723_Effect_of_Organic_and_Inorganic_Sources_of_Nutrients_on_Rice_Yield_Yield_Attributing_Parameters_Content_and_Uptake_of_Nutrients_in_Alfisols_of_Chhattisgarh/stats (accessed on 18 November 2023).
  12. Herencia, J.F.; Garcia-Galavis, P.A.; Maqueda, C. Long-term effect of organic and mineral fertilization on soil physical properties under greenhouse and outdoor management practices. Pedosphere 2011, 21, 443–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Leifeld, J. How sustainable is organic farming? Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 150, 121–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tuomisto, H.L.; Hodge, I.D.; Riordan, P.; Macdonald, D.W. Does organic farming reduce environmental impacts?—A meta-analysis of European research. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 112, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dreval, Y.; Loboichenko, V.; Malko, A.; Morozov, A.; Zaika, S.; Kis, V. The Problem of Comprehensive Analysis of Organic Agriculture as a Factor of Environmental Safety. Environ. Clim. Technol. 2020, 24, 58–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gattinger, A.; Muller, A.; Haeni, M.; Skinner, C.; Fliessbach, A.; Buchmann, N.; Mäder, P.; Stolze, M.; Smith, P.; Scialabba, N.E.-H.; et al. Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 18226–18231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Niemiec, M.; Chowaniak, M.; Sikora, J.; Szeląg-Sikora, A.; Gródek-Szostak, Z.; Komorowska, M. Selected Properties of Soils for Long-Term Use in Organic Farming. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Deria, A.M.; Bell, R.W.; O’Hara, G.W. Organic wheat production and soil nutrient status in a Mediterranean Climatic Zone. J. Sustain. Agric. 2003, 21, 21–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Król, A.; Lipiec, J.; Turski, M.; Kuś, J. Effects of organic and conventional management on physical properties of soil aggregates. Int. Agrophysics 2013, 27, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kwiatkowski, C.A.; Harasim, E. Chemical Properties of Soil in Four-Field Crop Rotations under Organic and Conventional Farming Systems. Agronomy 2020, 10, 1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Belopukhov, S.; Grigoryeva, M.; Dmitrevskaya, I.; Zhevnerov, A. Agroecological approach to quality assessment of organic aromatic products. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 282, 02004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fließbach, A.; Mäder, P. Microbial biomass and size-density fractions differ between soils of organic and conventional agricultural systems. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2000, 32, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Anglade, J.; Billen, G.; Garnier, J.; Makridis, T.; Puech, T.; Tittel, C. Nitrogen soil surface balance of organic vs conventional cash crop farming in the Seine watershed. Agric. Syst. 2015, 139, 82–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sánchez de Cima, D.; Luik, A.; Reintam, E. Organic farming and cover crops as an alternative to mineral fertilizers to improve soil physical properties. Int. Agrophysics 2015, 29, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sacco, D.; Moretti, B.; Monaco, S.; Grignani, C. Six-year transition from conventional to organic farming: Effects on crop production and soil quality. Eur. J. Agron. 2015, 69, 10–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fan, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Jiang, J.; Waheed, A.; Wang, S.; Rasheed, S.M.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, R. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Supply on Soil Properties, Tomato Yield, and Fruit Quality: A Global Meta-Analysis. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Elkhlifi, Z.; Iftikhar, J.; Sarraf, M.; Ali, B.; Saleem, M.H.; Ibranshahib, I.; Bispo, M.D.; Meili, L.; Ercisli, S.; Kayabasi, E.T.; et al. Potential Role of Biochar on Capturing Soil Nutrients, Carbon Sequestration and Managing Environmental Challenges: A Review. Sustainability 2023, 15, 2527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Butkevičienė, L.M.; Steponavičienė, V.; Pupalienė, R.; Skinulienė, L.; Bogužas, V. Effect of Different Tillage Systems and Soil Biostimulants on Agrochemical Properties and Intensity of Soil CO2 Emission in Wheat Crop. Agronomy 2023, 13, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Stekolnikov, K.E. Органическoе земледелие в Рoссии—Благo или катастрoфа? (Organic farming in Russia—A blessing or a disaster?). Биoсфера (The Biosphere) 2020, 12, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lampkin, N.; Padel, S.; Foster, C. Organic farming. In Cap Regimes And The European Countryside: Prospects for Integration between Agricultural, Regional And Environmental Policies; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2000; pp. 221–238. [Google Scholar]
  31. Connor, D.J. Organic agriculture cannot feed the world. Field Crop. Res. 2008, 106, 187–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gamage, A.; Gangahagedara, R.; Gamage, J.; Jayasinghe, N.; Kodikara, N.; Suraweera, P.; Merah, O. Role of organic farming for achieving sustainability in agriculture. Farming Syst. 2023, 1, 100005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Szeląg-Sikora, A.; Sikora, J.; Niemiec, M.; Gródek-Szostak, Z.; Kapusta-Duch, J.; Kuboń, M.; Komorowska, M.; Karcz, J. Impact of Integrated and Conventional Plant Production on Selected Soil Parameters in Carrot Production. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Органическoе Сельскoе Хoзяйствo: Иннoвациoнные Технoлoгии, Опыт, Перспективы: Научнo-Аналитический Обзoр (Organic Agriculture: Innovative Technologies, Experience, Prospects: A Scientific And Analytical Review); ФГБНУ «Рoсинфoрмагрoтех»: Moscow, Russia, 2019; 92p.
  35. Практикум пo агрoхимии (Workshop on agrochemistry)/V.V.; Kidin, I.P.; Deryugin, V.I. Kobzarenko and Others; КoлoсС: Moscow, Russia, 2008; 59p. [Google Scholar]
  36. USSR 26205-91; Soils. Determination of Mobile Compounds of Phosphorus and Potassium by Machigin Method Modified by CINAO. Кoмитет пo стандартизации и метрoлoгии СССР: Moscow, Russia, 1993.
  37. USSR 26213-84; Soils. Determination of Humus by the Tyurin Method Modified by CINAO. Кoмитет пo стандартизации и метрoлoгии СССР: Moscow, Russia, 1989.
  38. Seidel, R.; Moyer, J.; Nichols, K.; Bhosekar, V. Studies on long-term performance of organic and conventional cropping systems in Pennsylvania. Org. Agric. 2017, 7, 53–61. Available online: https://typeset.io/papers/studies-on-long-term-performance-of-organic-and-conventional-1mvnekkhwt (accessed on 18 November 2023). [CrossRef]
  39. Belopukhov, S.L.; Grigoryeva, M.V.; Bagnavets, N.L.; Osipova, A.; Rybkin, I.D. The influence of agrotechnologies of organic farming on the content of humus, phosphorus and potassium in the soil. Braz. J. Biol. 2023, 83, e275585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Grigorieva, M.V.; Dmitrevskaya, I.; Osipova, A.; Belopukhov, S. The chemical training of agrarian specialists: From the chemicalization of agriculture to green technologies. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Grigorieva, M.V.; Belopukhov, S.L.; Dmitrevskaya, I.I.; Seregina, I.I. “Green” chemistry as the basis for development of the philosophy of sustainable education in an agricultural university. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Sustainable Development: Industrial Future of Territories (IFT 2021), Yekaterinburg, Russia, 24 September 2021; Yakov Silin, P., Ed.; Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research; Atlantis Press: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2021; pp. 687–691. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Fields of the agricultural enterprise where the study was conducted.
Figure 1. Fields of the agricultural enterprise where the study was conducted.
Sustainability 16 00665 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of fields based on mobile phosphorus content in field soils. Source: Compiled by the authors.
Figure 2. Distribution of fields based on mobile phosphorus content in field soils. Source: Compiled by the authors.
Sustainability 16 00665 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of fields based on the content of exchangeable potassium in field soils. Source: Compiled by the authors.
Figure 3. Distribution of fields based on the content of exchangeable potassium in field soils. Source: Compiled by the authors.
Sustainability 16 00665 g003
Figure 4. Mobile phosphorus (mg/kg) content in the soil of field № 38, 2021. Source: Compiled by the authors.
Figure 4. Mobile phosphorus (mg/kg) content in the soil of field № 38, 2021. Source: Compiled by the authors.
Sustainability 16 00665 g004
Figure 5. Exchangeable potassium (mg/kg) content in the soil of field № 38 (2021). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Figure 5. Exchangeable potassium (mg/kg) content in the soil of field № 38 (2021). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Sustainability 16 00665 g005
Figure 6. Organic matter (%) content in the soil of field № 38 (in percentages). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Figure 6. Organic matter (%) content in the soil of field № 38 (in percentages). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Sustainability 16 00665 g006
Figure 7. Aggregate composition and total spectrum map of chemical elements for the soil of field № 63 (fraction less than 0.5 mm). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Figure 7. Aggregate composition and total spectrum map of chemical elements for the soil of field № 63 (fraction less than 0.5 mm). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Sustainability 16 00665 g007
Figure 8. Map of calcium (A) and aluminum (B) distribution in field № 63 (in percentage). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Figure 8. Map of calcium (A) and aluminum (B) distribution in field № 63 (in percentage). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Sustainability 16 00665 g008
Figure 9. Map of iron (A) and titanium (B) distribution in the field № 63 (in percentage). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Figure 9. Map of iron (A) and titanium (B) distribution in the field № 63 (in percentage). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Sustainability 16 00665 g009
Figure 10. Microphotograph of a soil sample from field № 63 (fraction 1–2 mm, white particles). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Figure 10. Microphotograph of a soil sample from field № 63 (fraction 1–2 mm, white particles). Source: Compiled by the authors.
Sustainability 16 00665 g010
Figure 11. Microphotographs of soil from field № 63 after burning at T = 950 °C. Source: Compiled by the authors.
Figure 11. Microphotographs of soil from field № 63 after burning at T = 950 °C. Source: Compiled by the authors.
Sustainability 16 00665 g011
Table 1. The content of mobile forms of phosphorus in the study period and the value of the residual variation.
Table 1. The content of mobile forms of phosphorus in the study period and the value of the residual variation.
The Content of Mobile Forms of Phosphorus2017, mg/100 g2019, mg/100 g2021, mg/100 g
Very low23.824.024.1
Low55.855.655.9
Medium17.017.116.9
Increased0.70.50.5
High1.31.11.0
Very high1.41.71.6
Residual462.16
Table 2. The results of the distribution of potassium content determined by gradation levels and the amount of residual variation.
Table 2. The results of the distribution of potassium content determined by gradation levels and the amount of residual variation.
The Content of Exchangeable Potassium2017, mg/100 g2019, mg/100 g2021, mg/100 g
Very low0.00.00.0
Low11.111.011.3
Medium74.872.975.1
Increased10.610.810.1
High0.71.00.9
Very high2.84.32.6
Residual819.8
Table 3. The results of the distribution of humus content determined by gradation levels over the study period and the amount of residual variation.
Table 3. The results of the distribution of humus content determined by gradation levels over the study period and the amount of residual variation.
The Content of Soil Organic Matter (Humus) (%)201720192021
Very low0.00.00.0
Low0.00.00.0
Medium34.133.936.5
Increased40.942.741.0
High25.021.422.5
Very high0.02.00.0
Residual365.22
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Trukhachev, V.I.; Belopukhov, S.L.; Grigoryeva, M.; Dmitrevskaya, I.I. Study of the Sustainability of Ecological and Chemical Indicators of Soils in Organic Farming. Sustainability 2024, 16, 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020665

AMA Style

Trukhachev VI, Belopukhov SL, Grigoryeva M, Dmitrevskaya II. Study of the Sustainability of Ecological and Chemical Indicators of Soils in Organic Farming. Sustainability. 2024; 16(2):665. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020665

Chicago/Turabian Style

Trukhachev, Vladimir Ivanovich, Sergey Leonidovich Belopukhov, Marina Grigoryeva, and Inna Ivanovna Dmitrevskaya. 2024. "Study of the Sustainability of Ecological and Chemical Indicators of Soils in Organic Farming" Sustainability 16, no. 2: 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020665

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop