Next Article in Journal
Assessing the Role of Self-Efficacy in Reducing Psychological Reactance to Guilt Appeals Promoting Sustainable Behaviors
Previous Article in Journal
Ensuring a Sustainable STEM Sector in the U.S.: The Role of Culturally Responsive Mentoring in Undergraduate Education
Previous Article in Special Issue
Only the Friendly Face? The Consequences of Consumer Education for Green Consumerism in Remanufacturing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

“We Don’t Always Have to Be Talking about It”: Moral Reasoning in US Early Childhood Education for Sustainable Development

by
Shannon Audley
1,*,
Julia L. Ginsburg
2 and
Cami Furlong
1
1
Department of Education and Child Study, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063, USA
2
Department of Applied Human Sciences, Concordia University, Montreal, QC H3G 1M8, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(17), 7774; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177774
Submission received: 1 August 2024 / Revised: 1 September 2024 / Accepted: 2 September 2024 / Published: 6 September 2024

Abstract

The climate crisis is both an environmental and moral issue. The United Nations’ (UN) Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide a framework for a global response to systematically challenge the world’s reactions to the climate crisis, making sustainable education for all a priority. For such sustainability education to be effective, it should engage children in early childhood in, about, and for the environment, emphasizing the moral ramifications of climate equity and justice. We investigated in what ways 19 United States (US) nature-based early childhood educators focused their sustainability education (ECEfS) in, about, and for the environment. The types of activities that engaged about and for experiences were related to the moral principles of welfare, harm reduction, resource allocation, and equality, as well as teachers’ reasoning about these experiences with children. Our findings suggest that educators’ curricula and activities reflect potential moral issues related to sustainable development. However, educators did not engage children in moral reasoning about these issues. A possible explanation is US teachers’ beliefs about developmental practice and children’s capabilities leading them to rarely engage in moral reasoning about sustainability issues instead of scaffolding children to develop personal psychological resources, thereby supporting the SDG for sustainable education.
Keywords: education for sustainable development; moral reasoning; early childhood education education for sustainable development; moral reasoning; early childhood education

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Audley, S.; Ginsburg, J.L.; Furlong, C. “We Don’t Always Have to Be Talking about It”: Moral Reasoning in US Early Childhood Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177774

AMA Style

Audley S, Ginsburg JL, Furlong C. “We Don’t Always Have to Be Talking about It”: Moral Reasoning in US Early Childhood Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability. 2024; 16(17):7774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177774

Chicago/Turabian Style

Audley, Shannon, Julia L. Ginsburg, and Cami Furlong. 2024. "“We Don’t Always Have to Be Talking about It”: Moral Reasoning in US Early Childhood Education for Sustainable Development" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177774

APA Style

Audley, S., Ginsburg, J. L., & Furlong, C. (2024). “We Don’t Always Have to Be Talking about It”: Moral Reasoning in US Early Childhood Education for Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 16(17), 7774. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177774

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop