Next Article in Journal
Pro-Environmental Agriculture to Promote a Sustainable Lifestyle
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Smart Travel Service in Intercity Travel Satisfaction: Does Traveler Heterogeneity Matter?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainability Indicators to MSW Treatment Assessment: The Rio de Janeiro Case Study

1
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia de Processos Químicos e Bioquímicos (EPQB), Escola de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil
2
Chemical Engineering, University Center SENAI CIMATEC, Salvador 41650-010, Brazil
3
Escola de Química, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-909, Brazil
4
Chemical Engineering Program, Instituto Alberto Luiz Coimbra de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa de Engenharia (COPPE), Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-972, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2024, 16(17), 7445; https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177445
Submission received: 10 July 2024 / Revised: 23 August 2024 / Accepted: 26 August 2024 / Published: 28 August 2024

Abstract

The Brazilian Policy foresees the waste management hierarchy, according to which energy reuse from waste is preferred to final disposal. However, less than 0.2% of the country’s waste goes to energy production. This paper proposes sustainability indicators to support the decision to choose the best process to treat municipal solid waste (MSW) through bioenergy generation technologies. Then, we conduct a case study for Rio de Janeiro. Incineration and gasification were not economically feasible—despite TRL 9 and 8. However, the projects presented a null net present value by increasing the gate fee to 94.69 and 255.39 USD/ton of MSW, respectively. The social indicators (job creation, salary increase with the absorption of waste pickers, population served, reduction in MSW sent to landfill) did not indicate the best technology. The results of the environmental indicators for incineration and gasification were, respectively, 0.45 and 0.37 t CO2eq/tMSW for GWP, 1.49 and 1.23 MWh/tMSW for energy intensity, 1.24 and 6.14 m3/tMSW for water intensity, 39.3 and 27.9 m2/tMSW for land use and 0.135 and 0.088 t SO2eq/tMSW for acidification. Gasification presented better results on 60% of the environmental indicators. However, incineration scored better in the important ones, water and energy intensities, in addition to the technical–economic aspect.
Keywords: municipal solid waste; waste-to-energy; sustainability tripod; bioenergy municipal solid waste; waste-to-energy; sustainability tripod; bioenergy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oliveira, J.P.; Pessoa, F.L.P.; Mehl, A.; Alves, F.C.; Secchi, A.R. Sustainability Indicators to MSW Treatment Assessment: The Rio de Janeiro Case Study. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177445

AMA Style

Oliveira JP, Pessoa FLP, Mehl A, Alves FC, Secchi AR. Sustainability Indicators to MSW Treatment Assessment: The Rio de Janeiro Case Study. Sustainability. 2024; 16(17):7445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177445

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oliveira, Júlia P., Fernando L. P. Pessoa, Ana Mehl, Flávia C. Alves, and Argimiro R. Secchi. 2024. "Sustainability Indicators to MSW Treatment Assessment: The Rio de Janeiro Case Study" Sustainability 16, no. 17: 7445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177445

APA Style

Oliveira, J. P., Pessoa, F. L. P., Mehl, A., Alves, F. C., & Secchi, A. R. (2024). Sustainability Indicators to MSW Treatment Assessment: The Rio de Janeiro Case Study. Sustainability, 16(17), 7445. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177445

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop