A Study on the Evolution of Forest Landscape Patterns in the Fuxin Region of China Combining SC-UNet and Spatial Pattern Perspectives
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Study Region and Data
2.1. Overview of the Study Region
2.2. Research Information
3. Research Methodology
3.1. Spatial and Channel Reconstruction Convolution
3.2. SC-UNet Forest Extraction Model
3.3. A Morphology-Based Approach to Analyzing Forest Spatial Patterns
3.4. Multivariate Weighted Results
4. Experiments and Analysis
4.1. Experimental Data
- (1)
- Although forest differs greatly from the background features in remote sensing images in the growing season, the glare, mountain shadows, interfering clouds, and sparse forest when the remote sensing image data are acquired will also produce forests with greater intra-class diversity in the remote sensing images, because the forest is mostly distributed in mountainous and hilly terrain areas. Therefore, in order to enhance the accuracy and robustness of the proposed SCConv method for forest extraction in Sentinel-2 multispectral images with different natural geographic conditions, different image acquisition times, and different imaging conditions, we acquired images of different imaging times, different imaging regions, and different natural geographic environments in the northeastern region of China, to produce the forest land dataset, as shown in Table 2. In Table 2, the color image is the localization of the Sentinel-2 satellite image and the binary image is the sample label corresponding to the color image. In this case, white color is the forest land and black color is the background.
- (2)
- The original size of the Sentinel-2 multispectral images is large, and in order to improve the iterative training speed of the model, the images were cropped to a 512 × 512 pixel size in this study. The dataset is based on different background complexities, image brightnesses, and clouds interfering. A total of 9220 samples were produced, including 5320 positive samples and 3900 negative samples without forest land labeling. The dataset was divided into training samples, validation samples, and test samples in the ratio of 0.8:0.1:0.1 [60].
- (3)
- The edge lines of the forest in the imagery were manually labeled using the Labelme module to produce a label set. The sample set and its corresponding label set were combined to form the remote sensing image forest land extraction dataset for deep learning.
4.2. Model Training
4.3. Experimental Results
5. Discussion
5.1. Spatial and Temporal Changes of Forest Land in the Fuxin Region
5.2. Evolution of the Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Forest Landscape Categories in the Fuxin Region Based on MSPA
5.3. Limitations and Future Research
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Peng, X.; He, G.; She, W.; Zhang, X.; Wang, G.; Yin, R.; Long, T. A Comparison of Random Forest Algorithm-Based Forest Extraction with GF-1 WFV, Landsat 8 and Sentinel-2 Images. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 5296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Zhang, B.; Song, W.; Xie, Q.; Chang, X.; Zhao, R. Forest Canopy Height Estimation by Integrating Structural Equation Modeling and Multiple Weighted Regression. Forests 2024, 15, 369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, B.; Zhu, H.; Xu, W.; Xu, S.; Chang, X.; Song, W.; Zhu, J. A Fourier–Legendre Polynomial Forest Height Inversion Model Based on a Single-Baseline Configuration. Forests 2024, 15, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Frenne, P.; Lenoir, J.; Luoto, M.; Scheffers, B.; Zellweger, F.; Aalto, J.; Ashcroft, M.; Christiansen, D.; Decocq, G.; De Pauw, K.; et al. Forest microclimates and climate change: Importance, drivers and future research agenda. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2021, 27, 2279–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ripple, W.J.; Bradshaw, G.A.; Spies, T.A. Measuring forest landscape patterns in the Cascade Range of Oregon, USA. Biol. Conserv. 1991, 57, 73–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Yang, X. A hierarchical approach to forest landscape pattern characterization. Environ. Manag. 2012, 49, 64–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tariq, A.; Jiango, Y.; Li, Q.; Gao, J.; Lu, L.; Soufan, W.; Almutairi, K.; Habib-ur-Rahman, M. Modelling, mapping and monitoring of forest cover changes, using support vector machine, kernel logistic regression and naive bayes tree models with optical remote sensing data. Heliyon 2023, 9, e13212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cross, M.D.; Scambos, T.; Pacifici, F.; Marshall, W.E. Determining effective meter-scale image data and spectral vegetation indices for tropical forest tree species differentiation. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote Sens. 2019, 12, 2934–2943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhang, J.; Gao, J. Remote sensing monitoring of the subalpine coniferous forests and quantitative analysis of the characteristics of succession in east mountain area of Tibetan Plateau—A case study with Zamtange county. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2011, 12, 926–930. [Google Scholar]
- Franklin, S.E.; Hall, R.J.; Moskal, L.M.; Maudie, A.J.; Lavigne, M.B. Incorporating texture into classification of forest species composition from airborne multispectral images. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2000, 21, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, K.; Wang, J. Forest type classification based on integrated spectral-spatial-temporal features and random forest algorithm—A case study in the Qinling mountains. Forests 2019, 10, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, G.; Niculescu, S. Mapping and monitoring of land cover/land use (LCLU) changes in the Crozon peninsula (Brittany, France) from 2007 to 2018 by machine learning algorithms (support vector machine, random forest, and convolutional neural network) and by post-classification comparison (PCC). Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 3899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haq, M.A.; Rahaman, G.; Baral, P.; Ghosh, A. Deep learning based supervised image classification using UAV images for forest areas classification. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2021, 49, 601–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chai, J.; Zeng, H.; Li, A.; Ngai, E.W.T. Deep learning in computer vision: A critical review of emerging techniques and application scenarios. Mach. Learn. Appl. 2021, 6, 100134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dhanya, V.G.; Subeesh, A.; Kushwaha, N.L.; Vishwakarma, D.K.; Kumar, T.N.; Ritika, G.; Singh, A.N. Deep learning based computer vision approaches for smart agricultural applications. Artif. Intell. Agric. 2022, 6, 211–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moshayedi, A.J.; Roy, A.S.; Kolahdooz, A.; Shuxin, Y. Deep learning application pros and cons over algorithm deep learning application pros and cons over algorithm. EAI Endorsed Trans. AI Robot. 2022, 1, 7. [Google Scholar]
- Ghasemi, Y.; Jeong, H.; Choi, S.H.; Park, K.B.; Lee, J.Y. Deep learning-based object detection in augmented reality: A systematic review. Comput. Ind. 2022, 139, 103661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, X.; Zhang, B.; Zhu, H.; Song, W.; Ren, D.; Dai, J. A Spatial and Temporal Evolution Analysis of Desert Land Changes in Inner Mongolia by Combining a Structural Equation Model and Deep Learning. Remote Sens. 2023, 15, 3617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dong, S.; Wang, P.; Abbas, K. A survey on deep learning and its applications. Comput. Sci. Rev. 2021, 40, 100379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Long, J.; Shelhamer, E.; Darrell, T. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Boston, MA, USA, 7–12 June 2015; pp. 3431–3440. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, J.; Song, L.; Li, Z.; Sun, H.; Sun, J.; Zheng, N. End-to-end object detection with fully convolutional network. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Nashville, TN, USA, 20–25 June 2021; pp. 15849–15858. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, S.; Shi, J.; Chen, Z. HG-FCN: Hierarchical grid fully convolutional network for fast VVC intra coding. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol. 2022, 32, 5638–5649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, S.; Liu, C.; Zhang, Y. Fully convolution network architecture for steel-beam crack detection in fast-stitching images. Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 2022, 165, 108377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Zhang, B.; Chang, X.; Song, W.; Dai, J.; Li, J. A Study of Sandy Land Changes in the Chifeng Region from 1990 to 2020 Based on Dynamic Convolution. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ronneberger, O.; Fischer, P.; Brox, T. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, 5–9 October 2015; proceedings, part III 18. Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 234–241. [Google Scholar]
- Su, Z.; Li, W.; Ma, Z.; Gao, R. An improved U-Net method for the semantic segmentation of remote sensing images. Appl. Intell. 2022, 52, 3276–3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- John, D.; Zhang, C. An attention-based U-Net for detecting deforestation within satellite sensor imagery. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2022, 107, 102685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meena, S.R.; Soares, L.P.; Grohmann, C.H.; Westen, C.; Bhuyan, K.; Singh, R.P.; Floris, M.; Catani, F. Landslide detection in the Himalayas using machine learning algorithms and U-Net. Landslides 2022, 19, 1209–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alsabhan, W.; Alotaiby, T.; Dudin, B. Detecting buildings and nonbuildings from satellite images using U-Net. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2022, 2022, 4831223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Wang, H.; Miao, F. Building extraction from remote sensing images using deep residual U-Net. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 2022, 55, 71–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, C.; Fan, X.; Fan, J.; Wang, N. Improved U-Net remote sensing classification algorithm based on Multi-Feature Fusion Perception. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, R.; Zhu, D. Study of land cover classification based on knowledge rules using high-resolution remote sensing images. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38, 3647–3652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, B.; Xia, M.; Huang, J. Mfanet: A multi-level feature aggregation network for semantic segmentation of land cover. Remote Sens. 2021, 13, 731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navin, M.S.; Agilandeeswari, L. Comprehensive review on land use/land cover change classification in remote sensing. J. Spectr. Imaging 2020, 9, a8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kupidura, P. The Comparison of Different Methods of Texture Analysis for Their Efficacy for Land Use Classification in Satellite Imagery. Remote Sens. 2019, 11, 1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, M.; Shi, J.; Li, Z.; Li, C.; Zhu, J.; Liu, S. Towards better analysis of deep convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016, 23, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, R.; Samat, A.; Zhu, E.; Li, E.; Li, W. Unsupervised Domain Adaptation with Contrastive Learning-Based Discriminative Feature Augmentation for RS Image Classification. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, S. Object-Based Semi-Supervised Spatial Attention Residual UNet for Urban High-Resolution Remote Sensing Image Classification. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.; Guo, J.; Yang, H.; Guan, R.; Zhang, T. SSMA-YOLO: A Lightweight YOLO Model with Enhanced Feature Extraction and Fusion Capabilities for Drone-Aerial Ship Image Detection. Drones 2024, 8, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Q.; Feng, D.; Cao, C.; Zeng, X.; Feng, Z.; Wu, J.; Huang, Z. Improved Mask R-CNN for Aircraft Detection in Remote Sensing Images. Sensors 2021, 21, 2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, S.; Ganguly, S.; Dungan, J.L.; Wang, W.; Nemani, R.R. Sentinel-2 MSI radiometric characterization and cross-calibration with Landsat-8 OLI. Adv. Remote Sens. 2017, 6, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gašparović, M.; Jogun, T. The effect of fusing Sentinel-2 bands on land-cover classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2018, 39, 822–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lamquin, N.; Woolliams, E.; Bruniquel, V.; Gascon, F.; Gorroño, J.; Govaerts, Y.; Leroy, V.; Lonjou, V.; Alhammoud, B.; Barsi, J.A.; et al. An inter-comparison exercise of Sentinel-2 radiometric validations assessed by independent expert groups. Remote Sens. Environ. 2019, 233, 111369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, W.; Zhang, M.; Jiang, K.; Zhu, D.; Huang, J.; Wang, P. Atmospheric correction method for Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Acta Opt. Sin. 2018, 38, 0128001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, F.; Lewis, P.E.; Gómez-Dans, J.L. Bayesian atmospheric correction over land: Sentinel-2/MSI and Landsat 8/OLI. Geosci. Model Dev. 2022, 15, 7933–7976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, J.F.; Wen, Y.; He, L.H. SCConv: Spatial and channel reconstruction convolution for feature redundancy. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 17–24 June 2023; IEEE Press: New York, NY, USA, 2023; pp. 6153–6162. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, C.F.; Oh, J.; Fan, Q.; Pistoia, M. SC-Conv: Sparse-complementary convolution for efficient model utilization on CNNs. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia (ISM), Taichung, Taiwan, 10–12 December 2018; pp. 97–100. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, Y.; He, K. Group Normalization. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany, 8–14 September 2018; Volume 3, pp. 3–19. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X.; Wang, W.; Hu, X.; Yang, J. Selective kernel networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, CA, USA, 15–20 June 2019; IEEE Press: New York, NY, USA, 2019; pp. 510–519. [Google Scholar]
- Ogundokun, R.O.; Maskeliunas, R.; Misra, S.; Damaševičius, R. Improved CNN based on batch normalization and Adam optimizer. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications, Malaga, Spain, 4–7 July 2022; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 593–604. [Google Scholar]
- Lange, S.; Helfrich, K.; Ye, Q. Batch normalization preconditioning for neural network training. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2022, 23, 1–41. [Google Scholar]
- Yu, X.; Zheng, Z.; Meng, L.; Li, L. Scene Recognition of Remotely Sensed Images Based on Bayes Adjoint Batch Normalization; Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University: Wuhan, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, X.; Zhu, Y.; Guo, Y.; Zhou, D. An image super-resolution network based on multi-scale convolution fusion. Vis. Comput. 2022, 38, 4307–4317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, H.; Chen, Y.; Xu, J.; Borse, S.; Cai, H.; Porikli, F.; Wang, X. Learning implicit feature alignment function for semantic segmentation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision, Tel Aviv, Israel, 23–27 October 2022; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 487–505. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, S.; Zhao, N.; Wen, Q.; Han, G.; He, S. Unifying Global-Local Representations in Salient Object Detection with Transformers. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. Intell. 2024, 8, 2870–2879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soille, P.; Vogt, P. Morphological segmentation of binary patterns. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2009, 30, 456–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vogt, P.; Ritters, K. GuidosToolbox: Universal digital image object analysis. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 2017, 50, 352–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xiong, C.; Wu, Z.; Zeng, Z.Y.; Gong, J.Z.; Li, J.T. Spatiotemporal evolution of forest landscape pattern in Guangdong-HongKong-Macao Greater Bay Area based on “Spatial Morphology-Fragmentation-Aggregation”. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2023, 43, 3032–3044. [Google Scholar]
- Pan, Y.; Jiao, S.; Hu, J.; Guo, Q.; Yang, Y. An Ecological Resilience Assessment of a Resource-Based City Based on Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis. Sustainability 2024, 16, 6476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, H.; Zhang, B.; Song, W.; Dai, J.; Lan, X.; Chang, X. Power-Weighted Prediction of Photovoltaic Power Generation in the Context of Structural Equation Modeling. Sustainability 2023, 15, 10808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hu, L.; Xu, N.; Liang, J.; Li, Z.; Chen, L.; Zhao, F. Advancing the Mapping of Mangrove Forests at National-Scale Using Sentinel-1 and Sentinel-2 Time-Series Data with Google Earth Engine: A Case Study in China. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 3120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, L.; Driscol, J.; Sarigai, S.; Wu, Q.; Chen, H.; Lippitt, C.D. Google Earth Engine and Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Comprehensive Review. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, L.; Zhu, L.; Xu, N.; Liang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Li, X. Climate Change and Diurnal Warming: Impacts on the Growth of Different Vegetation Types in the North–South Transition Zone of China. Land 2022, 12, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
MSPA Class | Calculation Formula | Description |
---|---|---|
Core | : a collection of image elements that refers to a large aggregation of green image elements with a certain distance from the boundary; : threshold calculation; : distance; : size parameter; : Euclidean distance transform; : image elements of the input image. | |
Islet | : a collection of green pixels that are not connected and have a small number of aggregates that cannot be used as a core class; : pixels of the input image; : reconstruction by expanding pixel with the core area () as the starting point. | |
Loop | = set of image elements connecting the core classes in the same place; | : a collection of narrow green pixels connecting the same core class, also characterized by corridors; : connecting region; : expansion in terms of distance with respect to ; : pixels in the input image; : core region; : connecting pixel starting from core region ; : traffic circle. |
Bridge | The set of image elements connecting at least two different core classes ; | : refers to a collection of non-core green image elements connecting at least two different core classes and exhibiting narrow corridor characteristics; : bridging area |
Perforation | The set of boundary image elements that are less than s from the center of the boundary; | : refers to the transition area between the core class and non-green space patches, i.e., the inner fringe of the green space; : boundary area; : threshold calculation; : distance; : dimensional parameter; : Euclidean distance transform; : graphemes in the input image; : core area; : isolated islands; : traffic circles; : bridging area; : aperture. |
Edge | : junction area between the core category and the main non-greenfield area; : fringe area. | |
Branch | : a collection of green pixels that are not core class areas and only one end is connected to an edge, bridge, traffic circle, or aperture class; : pixels in the input image; : core area; : isolated island : traffic circle; : bridge area; : aperture; : edge area. |
Normal Image | Glare | Sparse Forest Images | Clouds Interfering with the Image | Negative Sample Image |
---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter Indicators | Epochs | Batch_Size | Train Loss | Val Loss | Learning Rate |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameters | 85 | 8 | 0.073 | 0.081 | 1 × 10−6 |
Model | IoU/% | Precision/% | Recall/% | F1/% | Prediction Speed (s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
U-Net | 83.543 | 90.875 | 92.512 | 91.687 | 0.15 |
SC-UNet | 81.781 | 91.317 | 92.177 | 91.745 | 0.021 |
Original Image | Ground Truth | U-Net | SC-UNet |
---|---|---|---|
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, F.; Yang, F.; Wang, Z. A Study on the Evolution of Forest Landscape Patterns in the Fuxin Region of China Combining SC-UNet and Spatial Pattern Perspectives. Sustainability 2024, 16, 7067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167067
Wang F, Yang F, Wang Z. A Study on the Evolution of Forest Landscape Patterns in the Fuxin Region of China Combining SC-UNet and Spatial Pattern Perspectives. Sustainability. 2024; 16(16):7067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167067
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Feiyue, Fan Yang, and Zixue Wang. 2024. "A Study on the Evolution of Forest Landscape Patterns in the Fuxin Region of China Combining SC-UNet and Spatial Pattern Perspectives" Sustainability 16, no. 16: 7067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167067
APA StyleWang, F., Yang, F., & Wang, Z. (2024). A Study on the Evolution of Forest Landscape Patterns in the Fuxin Region of China Combining SC-UNet and Spatial Pattern Perspectives. Sustainability, 16(16), 7067. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167067