How Does Air Pollution Impact Residence Intention of Rural Migrants? Empirical Evidence from the CMDS
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Theoretical Analysis and Research Hypotheses
3.1. Direct Effects
3.2. Moderating Effects
3.2.1. Social Networks
3.2.2. Social Integration
4. Methods and Models
4.1. Data
4.2. Variables Setting
4.2.1. Dependent Variable
4.2.2. Independent Variable
4.2.3. Instrumental Variable
4.2.4. Control Variables
4.3. Model Construction
4.3.1. Baseline Model
4.3.2. Moderating Effect Model
5. Empirical Analysis
5.1. Baseline Results
5.2. Robustness Test
5.2.1. Endogenous Treatment
5.2.2. Replace Independent Variable
5.2.3. Replace Dependent Variable
5.2.4. Replace Regression Model
5.3. Moderating Effects Analysis
5.3.1. Social Networks
5.3.2. Social Integration
5.4. Heterogeneity Analysis
5.4.1. Geographical Location
5.4.2. Precipitation
5.4.3. Environmental Regulation
5.4.4. Age
5.4.5. Human Capital Levels
5.4.6. Flow Domain
6. Conclusions and Suggestions
- (1)
- The relevant subjects must adhere to the new development philosophy and continuously improve air quality. Local governments need to understand that air pollution not only damages the health of rural migrants but also runs counter to accelerating the process of new urbanization. Therefore, local governments should abandon the extensive economic development model at the expense of the environment and strive to achieve an effective balance between economic development and environmental protection. Firstly, local governments should improve environmental protection laws and regulations, such as standardizing carbon emissions trading and restricting the exploration of ecologically sensitive areas, to control air pollution comprehensively. In addition, local governments should strengthen the construction of environmental management institutions, increase supervision and penalties for heavily polluting enterprises, and enhance the implementation capacity of environmental protection policies. Secondly, local governments need to adopt production restriction measures for high-energy consumption and high-pollution industries at the policy level, support and guide the vigorous development of green and low-carbon industries such as new energy and energy conservation and emission reduction industries, and build bridges for economic development and environmental protection. Thirdly, local governments should strengthen the publicity of environmental protection, broaden the publicity channels of environmental protection, utilize television, newspapers, social media, and other platforms to popularize environmental protection knowledge and enhance public awareness of environmental protection.
- (2)
- Enterprises should face up to the negative impact of air pollution on rural migrants and accelerate the green-oriented transition. Firstly, enterprises should fulfill their primary responsibility for environmental protection, vigorously support the implementation of environmental policies, and actively participate in the pilot construction of national carbon emissions trading. Secondly, enterprises should integrate the concept of green and sustainable development throughout their production processes, adopt clean production methods, use clean energy, and improve energy efficiency, thereby reducing air pollutant emissions and improving the working environment for rural migrants. Thirdly, enterprises should leverage digital technologies such as big data, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence to drive green innovation, further strengthen the adjustment and optimization of their energy structure, and increase their green and low-carbon production levels. Rural migrants need to raise their environmental awareness, actively participate in environmental protection actions, and try to choose low-carbon lifestyles such as green travel and garbage sorting to reduce energy waste and the use of pollution sources. At the same time, rural migrants should practice the concept of green consumption and give preference to green products, thereby contributing their efforts to the continuous improvement of air quality.
- (3)
- Since the inhibitory effect of air pollution on the residence intentions of rural migrants is more significant in cities north of the Qinling Mountains-Huaihe River, cities with low precipitation, and cities with weak environmental regulations, cities should implement differentiated environmental governance policies and carry out air pollution control actions according to local conditions. Cities north of the Qinling Mountains-Huaihe River should reduce coal burning for heating and increase the proportion of clean energy for heating. At the same time, it is necessary to gradually improve the flexible heating mechanism in winter and adjust the heating time according to the weather conditions to reduce the waste of funds and energy and lower the emission of polluting gases. Cities with low precipitation should accelerate ecological civilization construction and improve the air purification capacity by afforestation and increasing green space. In addition, these regions should strengthen dust control on major transport roads and pay attention to dust management at construction sites, thereby achieving full coverage of dust area supervision. Cities with weak environmental regulation should strengthen air quality monitoring and control and guide enterprises to adopt environmental protection measures to reduce pollutant emissions. In contrast, cities with strong environmental regulation should adopt appropriate regulatory measures based on local development conditions to avoid adverse impacts on production activities caused by a “one-size-fits-all” approach. In addition, rural migrants who are easily impacted by air pollution, especially those with low human capital levels, should actively participate in employment skills training to enhance their human capital levels.
- (4)
- The results of this article indicate that strong social networks and deep social integration can alleviate the negative impact of air pollution on the residence intentions of rural migrants. On the one hand, local governments should broaden the social participation channels of rural migrants, encourage rural migrants to join labor unions or other social organizations, and deepen the connection between rural migrants and other urban groups, thereby enhancing the sense of value and belonging of rural migrants in urban life. On the other hand, local governments need to continue deepening the reform of the household registration system, accelerating the development of urban-rural integration, establishing a comprehensive social security system, and achieving the equalization of basic public services. This will allow rural migrants to share the fruits of urban development and promote their genuine integration into urban life.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Cai, F. Understanding Chinese Economics; China CITIC Press: Beijing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, X.; Han, L.M.; Yuan, B. Does the conversion of household registration actually improve the happiness of migrant workers in China? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, P.L.; Wu, Y.F.; Ouyang, H. Effect of hukou Accessibility on Migrants’ Long Term Settlement Intention in Destination. Sustainability 2022, 14, 7209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, S.H.; Wang, J.X.; Chen, J.; Ritakallio, V.M. The effect of health on urban-settlement intention of rural-urban migrants in China. Health Place 2017, 47, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, L.N.; Liu, Y.S. Understanding the gap between de facto and de jure urbanization in China: A perspective from rural migrants’ settlement intention. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 2020, 39, 311–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tian, M.; Xu, Q.W. Process and determinisms of settlement intention among China’s migrant workers. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2023, 78, 1376–1391. [Google Scholar]
- Shi, Q.H.; Zhou, Y.X. Regional differences and influencing factors of mobile population’s long-term settlement. J. South China Agric. Univ. 2022, 21, 69–84. [Google Scholar]
- Liang, X.X.; Li, Q.Y.; Zuo, W.; Wu, R. How does mobility and urban environment affect the migrants’ settlement intention? A perspective from the intergenerational differences. Front. Public Health 2024, 12, 1344400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, Z.H.; Lao, X.; Gu, H.Y.; Yu, H.C.; Lei, P. How does air pollution affect urban settlement of the floating population in China? New evidence from a push-pull migration analysis. BMC Public Health 2021, 21, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Giannakis, E.; Kushta, J.; Violaris, A.; Paisi, N.; Lelieveld, J. Inter-industry linkages, air pollution and human health in the European Union towards 2030. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2024. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zivin, J.G.; Neidell, M. The impact of pollution on worker productivity. Am. Econ. Rev. 2012, 102, 3652–3673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.M.; Yu, L. Stay or leave? The role of air pollution in urban migration choices. Ecol. Econ. 2020, 117, 106780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, Z.K. Public health services and migrant workers’ willingness to settle in cities: Evidence from China migrants dynamic survey. China Rural. Econ. 2021, 10, 125–144. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, F.; Xie, Y.J.; Zhou, D. Air pollution’s impact on the settlement intention of domestic migrants: Evidence from China. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2022, 9, 1067615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, W.B.; Zhang, K.X. The effects of air pollution on enterprises’ productivity: Evidence from Chinese industrial enterprises. Manag. World 2019, 35, 95–112+119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolpert, J. Migration as an adjustment to environmental stress. J. Soc. Issues 1966, 22, 92–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Speare, A. Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility. Demography 1974, 11, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kahn, M.E. Smog reduction’s impact on California county growth. J. Reg. Sci. 2020, 40, 565–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, S.M.; Guldmann, J.M. Accessibility, diversity, environmental quality and the dynamics of intra-urban population and employment location. Growth Chang. 2010, 41, 85–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vuong, Q.H.; Le, T.T.; Khuc, Q.V.; Nguyen, Q.L.; Nguyen, M.H. Escaping from air pollution: Exploring the psychological mechanism behind the emergence of internal migration intention among urban residents. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Germani, A.R.; Scaramozzino, P.; Castaldo, A. Does air pollution influence internal migration? An empirical investigation on Italian provinces. Environ. Sci. Policy 2021, 120, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cao, G.Z.; Liu, J.J.; Liu, T. Examining the role of air quality in shaping the landscape of China’s internal migration: Phase characteristics, push and pull effects. Geogr. Res. 2021, 40, 199–212. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, Y. The role of air pollution risk perception in labor migration: The perspective of healthy human capital investment. Popul. Dev. 2021, 27, 51–64. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, Q.B.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y. Environmental migration effects of air pollution: Micro-level evidence from China. Environ. Pollut. 2022, 292, 118263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heyes, A.; Zhu, M.Y. Air pollution as a cause of sleeplessness: Social media evidence from a panel of Chinese cities. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2019, 98, 102247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zanobetti, A.; Redline, S.; Schwartz, J.; Rosen, D.; Patel, S.; O’Connor, G.T.; Lebowitz, M.; Coull, B.A.; Gold, D.R. Associations of PM10 with sleep and sleep-disordered breathing in adults from Seven US Urban Areas. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2010, 182, 819–825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lu, H.; Yue, A.L.; Chen, H.; Long, R.Y. Could smog pollution lead to the migration of local skilled workers? Evidence from the Jing-Jin-Ji region in China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 130, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, H.J.; Liu, X.M.; Tao, X.J. The spatial and temporal effect on labor supply time--empirical evidence from China labor force dynamics survey. Econ. Perspect. 2021, 11, 76–90. [Google Scholar]
- Lakshmi, P.V.M.; Virdi, N.K.; Sharma, A.; Tripathy, J.P.; Smith, K.R.; Bates, M.N.; Kumar, R. Household air pollution and stillbirths in India: Analysis of the DLHS-II national survey. Environ. Res. 2013, 121, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bishop, K.C.; Ketcham, J.D.; Kuminoff, N.V. Hazed and confused: The effect of air pollution on dementia. Rev. Econ. Stud. 2022, 90, 2188–2214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, M.X.; Grainger, C. The impact of air pollution on labor supply in China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 13082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hanna, R.; Oliva, P. The effect of pollution on labor supply: Evidence from a natural experiment in Mexico City. J. Public Econ. 2015, 122, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Manley, J.; Radoias, V. Medium and long-term consequences of pollution on labor supply: Evidence from Indonesia. J. Labor. Econ. 2017, 6, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.X.; Zhou, S.H.; Li, Z.J. Determinants of rural migrants’ urbanization: Evidence from the perspective of social network. Chin. J. Popul. Sci. 2023, 37, 51–66. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, M.Y. Human capital, social capital and the urbanization willingness of migrant workers. J. South China Agric. Univ. 2018, 17, 53–63. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, Y.H.; Shi, M. Research on migrant workers’ social status and their settlement intention. J. Soc. Sci. Hunan Norm. Univ. 2018, 47, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, H.Y.; Guo, X.L.; Li, C.Z.; Qian, W.R. Social ties and urban settlement intention of rural-to-urban migrants in China: The mediating role of place attachment and the moderating role of spatial pattern. Cities 2024, 145, 104725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.Q.; Liu, Y.; Li, Z.G. Settlement intention of new migrants in China’s large cities: Patterns and determinants. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2014, 34, 780–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Li, T.C. Impact of accessibility of compulsory education on migrant workers’ residency intention. J. South China Agric. Univ. 2024, 23, 48–62. [Google Scholar]
- Hering, L.; Poncet, S. Environmental policy and exports: Evidence from Chinese cities. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2014, 68, 296–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fisman, R.; Svensson, J. Are corruption and taxation really harmful to growth? Firm level evidence. J. Dev. Econ. 2007, 83, 63–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, X.X.; Zhong, S.H.; Qiu, Z.Y. Wealth or health? Haze pollution, intergenerational migration experience and settlement intentions of rural migrant workers. J. Rural Stud. 2024, 107, 103244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subramaniam, Y.; Loganathan, N.; Subramaniam, T. Moderating effect of governance on healthcare and environmental emissions. J. Environ. Manag. 2023, 351, 119646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, J.F.; Liu, R.M.; Shi, Y. From Semi-urbanization to urbanization: The education promotion mechanism of citizenization of migrant workers in China. J. Quant. Tech. Econ. 2023, 40, 138–156. [Google Scholar]
- Han, J.Q.; Yuan, C.Y. The study of rural floating population’s gender preference for their accompanying children. Youth Stud. 2023, 3, 37–49+95. [Google Scholar]
- Li, S.; Ying, Z.X.; Zhang, H.; Ge, G.; Liu, Q.J. Comprehensive assessment of urbanization coordination: A case study of Jiangxi Province, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2019, 29, 488–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.B.; Zheng, Q.B.; Li, Z. Industrial intelligence and urban air pollution control in China: Empirical evidence from the application of industrial robots. Manag. Rev. 2023, 35, 300–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, Y.; Yang, T.T.; Li, Z.R.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, M. Research on the direct and indirect effects of environmental regulation on environmental pollution: Empirical evidence from 253 prefecture-level cities in China. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 269, 122425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Shen, N. Environmental regulation and environmental productivity: The case of China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 62, 758–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Variables | Meaning | Mean | Std. Dev. | Min | Max |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intent | Residence intention | 0.4625 | 0.4986 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
AQI | Air quality index | 84.0925 | 18.8678 | 37.8333 | 133.9167 |
ACC | 88,424 | 7.1096 | 0.3849 | 5.7235 | 8.1137 |
Age | Age | 35.9120 | 10.1422 | 15.0000 | 96.0000 |
Gen | Gender | 0.5361 | 0.4987 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
Nat | Nation | 0.9226 | 0.2672 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
Mar | Marital status | 0.8273 | 0.3780 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
Edu | Education levels | 3.3153 | 1.0285 | 1.0000 | 7.0000 |
Pol | Political affiliation | 0.0936 | 0.2913 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
Hea | Health status | 0.9786 | 0.1447 | 0.0000 | 1.0000 |
Fam | Number of family members | 3.1843 | 1.1259 | 1.0000 | 10.0000 |
Inc | the total monthly family income | 8.6972 | 0.5734 | 3.9120 | 12.2061 |
Pgdp | Economic development levels | 11.2047 | 0.8698 | 7.7757 | 12.2234 |
Tem | Temperature inversion days | 180.6856 | 72.6392 | 9.0000 | 327.0000 |
Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
---|---|---|---|---|
AQI | −0.0124 *** | −0.0129 *** | −0.0142 *** | −0.0151 *** |
(−3.5336) | (−3.6265) | (−3.9955) | (−4.1961) | |
Age | 0.0099 *** | 0.0118 *** | 0.0118 *** | |
(18.8430) | (22.1552) | (22.1553) | ||
Gen | −0.0256 *** | −0.0345 *** | −0.0346 *** | |
(−2.8695) | (−3.8537) | (−3.8540) | ||
Nat | −0.0525 *** | −0.0728 *** | −0.0728 *** | |
(−2.9436) | (−4.0622) | (−4.0629) | ||
Mar | 0.4070 *** | 0.2783 *** | 0.2783 *** | |
(30.7079) | (20.1174) | (20.1175) | ||
Edu | 0.2053 *** | 0.1789 *** | 0.1789 *** | |
(40.5800) | (34.7992) | (34.7985) | ||
Pol | 0.0295 * | 0.0381 ** | 0.0381 ** | |
(1.7956) | (2.3101) | (2.3099) | ||
Hea | −0.1696 *** | −0.2478 *** | −0.2478 *** | |
(−5.4455) | (−7.9355) | (−7.9356) | ||
Fam | −0.0018 | −0.0017 | ||
(−0.4075) | (−0.3985) | |||
Inc | 0.2999 *** | 0.2999 *** | ||
(33.9556) | (33.9557) | |||
Pgdp | −0.0018 | |||
(−0.2100) | ||||
Tem | −0.0057 *** | |||
(−11.0763) | ||||
Cons | 1.1946 *** | 0.0271 | −2.2632 *** | −0.6637 |
(3.3505) | (0.0750) | (−6.1235) | (−1.4248) | |
FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Obs | 88,424 | 88,424 | 88,424 | 88,424 |
R2 | 0.0559 | 0.0798 | 0.0893 | 0.0893 |
Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
---|---|---|---|---|
First Stage | Second Stage | First Stage | Second Stage | |
AQI | −0.0079 *** | −0.0028 *** | ||
(−18.5909) | (−13.2173) | |||
ACC | − 0.0086 *** | |||
(−77.6833) | ||||
Demean | 0.7293 *** | |||
(170.2100) | ||||
Cons | 44.1399 *** | −0.1214 *** | 26.3261 *** | −0.3591 *** |
(40.6123) | (−2.9572) | (26.8192) | (−9.8805) | |
Controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Wald F Statistic | 6034.70 | 28971.46 | ||
Anderson canon.corr. LM statistic | 369.89 *** | 176.49 *** | ||
N | 88,424 | 88,424 | 88,424 | 88,424 |
R2 | 0.4563 | 0.4857 |
Variables | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AQI | −0.0136 *** | ||||||
(−4.1961) | |||||||
PM2.5 | −0.0206 *** | ||||||
(−4.1961) | |||||||
PM10 | −0.0322 *** | ||||||
(−4.1961) | |||||||
CO | −23.3854 *** | ||||||
(−4.1961) | |||||||
NO2 | −0.0207 *** | ||||||
(−4.1961) | |||||||
O3 | −0.1429 *** | ||||||
(−4.1961) | |||||||
SO2 | 0.6020 *** | ||||||
(4.1961) | |||||||
Cons | −2.4182 *** | −0.6435 | 1.8730 * | 47.7633 *** | −1.3382 *** | 2.3567 ** | −15.9579 *** |
(−15.3590) | (−1.3680) | (1.7752) | (3.9866) | (−4.1952) | (2.0156) | (−4.9718) | |
Controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Obs | 88,424 | 88,424 | 88,424 | 88,424 | 88,424 | 88,424 | 88,424 |
R2 | 0.0893 | 0.0893 | 0.0893 | 0.0893 | 0.0893 | 0.0893 | 0.0893 |
Variables | (1) | (3) | (4) |
---|---|---|---|
Replace Dependent Variable | Logic | OLS | |
AQI | −0.0195 *** | −0.0247 *** | −0.0058 *** |
(−5.4560) | (−4.2045) | (−4.3357) | |
Cons | 0.1716 | −1.1271 | 0.3261 * |
(0.3682) | (−1.4852) | (1.8827) | |
Controls | Yes | Yes | Yes |
FE | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Obs | 88,394 | 88,424 | 88,424 |
R2 | 0.1082 | 0.0894 | 0.1154 |
Variables | (1) | (2) |
---|---|---|
AQI | −0.0175 *** | −0.0152 *** |
(−4.8572) | (−4.1081) | |
AQI × Net | 0.0033 *** | |
(18.6318) | ||
Net | 0.0519 *** | |
(12.7989) | ||
AQI × Int | 0.0020 ** | |
(1.9805) | ||
Int | −0.1480 | |
(−1.6153) | ||
Cons | −0.7404 | −0.7393 |
(−1.5879) | (−1.5451) | |
Controls | Yes | Yes |
FE | Yes | Yes |
Obs | 88424 | 88424 |
R2 | 0.0922 | 0.0894 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Zhang, C.; Zhang, G. How Does Air Pollution Impact Residence Intention of Rural Migrants? Empirical Evidence from the CMDS. Sustainability 2024, 16, 5784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135784
Zhang C, Zhang G. How Does Air Pollution Impact Residence Intention of Rural Migrants? Empirical Evidence from the CMDS. Sustainability. 2024; 16(13):5784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135784
Chicago/Turabian StyleZhang, Chuanwang, and Guangsheng Zhang. 2024. "How Does Air Pollution Impact Residence Intention of Rural Migrants? Empirical Evidence from the CMDS" Sustainability 16, no. 13: 5784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135784
APA StyleZhang, C., & Zhang, G. (2024). How Does Air Pollution Impact Residence Intention of Rural Migrants? Empirical Evidence from the CMDS. Sustainability, 16(13), 5784. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16135784