Next Article in Journal
Environmentally Friendly Materialism: How It Is Generated and How Luxury Apparel Addresses Environmental Problems
Next Article in Special Issue
The Presence of a Family Communal Space as a Form of Local Wisdom towards Community Cohesion and Resilience in Coastal Settlements
Previous Article in Journal
Countermeasures for Improving Rural Living Environments under the Background of a Rural Revitalization Strategy Based on Computer Virtualization Technology
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Study on the Effect of Medical Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction during COVID-19 for Foreigners in Korea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

An Investigation of the Key Attributes of Korean Wellness Tourism Customers Based on Online Reviews

by
Aura Lydia Riswanto
1 and
Hak-Seon Kim
2,3,*
1
Department of Global Business, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, Republic of Korea
2
School of Hospitality & Tourism Management, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, Republic of Korea
3
Wellness & Tourism Big Data Research Institute, Kyungsung University, Busan 48434, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(8), 6702; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086702
Submission received: 14 March 2023 / Revised: 12 April 2023 / Accepted: 12 April 2023 / Published: 15 April 2023

Abstract

:
With its fast-growing trend, wellness tourism is transforming the client base and service and product offerings, and it is attracting new suppliers. The purpose of understanding the customer experience as portrayed in online reviews is to sustainably maintain customer loyalty and satisfaction. The objective of this research is to identify the critical attributes and their structural relationships to Korean wellness tourism. The study analyzed 24,060 Google-based customer reviews on 11 wellness tourism destinations in South Korea. Following the calculation of word frequencies in a matrix, UCINET 6.0 was utilized to analyze the centrality of the network and perform a CONCOR analysis. Based on the findings of the CONCOR analysis, the review data were sorted into four distinct categories. Following the quantitative analysis led to the identification of six variables that were grouped together through exploratory factor analysis.: wellness, tangible, value, F&B, purpose, and service. Whereas value, F&B, and service negatively affected the satisfaction of guests, the study also revealed that wellness, tangible, and purpose all had positive impacts and contributed to increased trust among wellness tourism customers. In terms of managerial implication, the results will enable wellness tourism destination managers to focus more on improving the factors of value, food, and service.

1. Introduction

The search for a meaningful lifestyle in today’s complex and challenging social landscape is led by modern versions of ancient practices, including meditation, yoga, massage, acupuncture, ayurveda, and naturopathy [1]. The concept of wellness is becoming an integral part of a sustainable future and has proven indispensable to individuals wishing to remain physically and mentally healthy [2]. Wellness concepts are gaining in popularity as a result of a growing number of individuals taking control of their health. A growing wellness trend has brought about significant changes in the tourism and hospitality fields [3]. In these field, there has been an increased need for methods for achieving wellness due to the need for substantial reward improvements in a state of spiritual balance [4].
The wellness tourism sector has experienced substantial expansion over the last few years, reaching $720.4 billion in 2019; despite previous growth, the industry suffered a decline to $435.7 billion in 2020 owing to the pandemic [1]. The industry experienced an 8.1% growth rate recorded in this sector from 2017 to 2019, which means a 50% higher growth rate than the 5.2% experienced by the tourism industry as a whole [1]. As a result of this growth, wellness retreat centers, hotel and resort brands, and specialty travel packages now offer a range of both active and passive wellness services [5]. Moreover, global tourism has seen an increase in wellness demand as people travel abroad to boost their health and wellbeing while enjoying tourism experiences [6,7]. Wellness-oriented businesses have expanded and now offer services such as fitness classes, massages, spas, healthy gourmet meals, and clinical treatments as part of their product offerings [8]. Globally, Asia–Pacific ranks third in terms of expenditures with $6.4 billion in national and international expenditures annually [9].
The historical context of Korean wellness tourism reveals that its origins can be traced back to the Joseon Dynasty (1392–1910), during which hot springs and mineral springs were utilized for medicinal purposes [10]. The popularity of Korean wellness tourism has been on the rise in recent times, with a significant number of visitors coming from neighboring Asian countries, including China and Japan [11]. According to a report by the Korea Tourism Organization, the total count of tourists from China visiting Korea for medical tourism has increased from approximately 18,000 in 2010 to over 350,000 in 2018. The report also notes that the number of Japanese tourists visiting Korea for medical tourism has also been steadily increasing [11]. In terms of stay duration, Korean wellness tourism destinations offer a variety of options for visitors, from short-term weekend retreats to longer stays of a week or more, and many wellness centers and resorts offer comprehensive programs that include accommodations, meals, and a range of wellness activities such as yoga, meditation, and spa treatments [11]. For example, Seoul, the capital city of South Korea, serves as a hub for both modern wellness and traditional Korean medicine practices, with many high-end wellness centers and hotels offering an array of treatments such as acupuncture and cosmetic surgery [11]. South Korea’s success in wellness tourism is evident from its ranking as the 12th largest market in the world and its ability to attract over 3 million international wellness tourists in 2018, which accounted for 5% of the total number of international tourists to the country [1].
Prior studies in tourism and hospitality have primarily concentrated on expanding the utilization of review sites and their effects on measurements of enterprise performance as a result, such as the booking of hotel rooms [12], the intention to book the hotel and trust in the hotel [13], as well as consumer outcomes such as hotel considerations [14]. Until now, this information resource has only been applied to the wellness tourism industry in a limited manner. The study of consumer satisfaction and experience is necessary in order to determine the effectiveness of wellness tourism, especially given its increasing popularity.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate and identify several key influencers within customer networks at wellness tourism destinations by analyzing online guest reviews and categorizing their respective significance. This study investigates the correlation between guest feedback and guest satisfaction using its rating system and provides a description of the evaluation focus and its influencing factors. Furthermore, by analyzing the rating system, this research investigates how guest feedback correlates with guest satisfaction at wellness tourism destinations in South Korea and provides general suggestions about wellness tourism marketing. A number of these recommendations may be beneficial to the industry in the future as well.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Wellness Tourism

Prior to discussing wellness tourism, it is essential to understand health in its broader context in order to grasp the context of wellness. As stated by the World Health Organization [15] “Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity”. Alternatively, the National Institute Wellness [16] defines “high-level wellness” in the following way: “functioning optimally within the current environment, it is achieved when there are sustainable shifts to behaviors, mindsets, and practices”. Even though wellness and health are two different perspectives, they are interconnected in the pursuit of better health outcomes. Health is seen as the ultimate objective, with wellness serving as the means to achieve it. However, it is important to note that wellness and well-being are separate concepts with subtle variations. Ultimately, wellness plays a critical role in overall health and should not be overlooked. As previously discussed, wellness can be viewed holistically as having dimensions in the domains of physical, mental, emotional, and environmental aspects of an individual’s well-being [17,18]. Scholars and organizations have long recognized the importance of wellness in preventing disease and maintaining health. The concept of wellness tourism has been defined in a number of different ways, with some emphasizing the demand side and others the supply side [19]. The supply and demand for wellness tourism may be defined as follows “the sum of all the relationships resulting from a journey by people whose motive in whole or in part is to maintain or promote their health and well-being, and who stay at least one night at a facility that is specifically designed to enable and enhance people’s physical, psychological, spiritual, and/or social well-being” [20].
Tourism related to wellness and healthcare provides a range of services to travelers, including medical and non-medical options, and can be classified into three different categories [21]. Firstly, wellness and health tourism is a form of tourism designed to ensure health, as well as well-being, to attain spiritual as well as physical relaxation in order to make people more conscious and enthusiastic about participating in society’s various activities [21,22]. Secondly, wellness and health can be defined as a means of attaining mental and physical wellness without requiring medical intervention during vacation [23]. The scholars holding this view argue that tourists travel for health reasons, as well as to find non-tangible values, such as maintaining a healthy balance between mind, body, and spirit [24]. As for the third definition, wellness and health tourism are integrated into the definition, and the focus is more on the end result [21,23]. Studies suggest that a tourist’s decision to choose a wellness and health tourism destination is significantly influenced by the quality of their experience, which can be used to forecast the number of visitors during the development of such tourism [25].
The meaning of wellness varies across different contexts and countries. In Europe, spa relaxation is a conventional practice that contrasts significantly with the spiritual traditions of Asia and the contemporary wellness practices [8]. Wellness tourism during the Middle Ages was mainly focused on achieving a sense of physical and spiritual equilibrium [26]. The nineteenth century saw a rise in the popularity of spa visits in an effort to improve health conditions. Because of this, the healing properties of spas were highly esteemed, leading to the development of numerous spas as tourist attractions [27]. In order to achieve well-being, tourists may choose activities based on their interests, life stages, and motivations: relaxation at luxury spas, life coaching, water activities or amusement parks, sports and fitness, medical treatments, or spiritual or meditation advancement [8]. As the spa industry continues to expand globally, the importance of service quality cannot be overstated [28]. Spas have historically been associated with the pursuit of health, but during the Renaissance, the practice of hot spring therapy evolved from medical treatment to a recreational pursuit [9]. Hot spring resorts and recreation centers were built to cater to the tourism trend of actively seeking to enhance health conditions [26].
The rising demand for wellness services has led numerous scholars to investigate the concept of wellness tourism in the tourism industry. It has become apparent that wellness tourism is an emerging pattern in the global travel and tourism sector, as well as a popular tourist offering for several reasons, due to various factors, such as the growing awareness of health concerns among the affluent population and the focus on physical, mental, or social wellness promotion [29]. Researchers believe customers who prioritize wellness are attracted to services that enhance their well-being and physical appearance, such as addressing discomfort and stress, improving healing, managing weight, and delaying the aging process [30]. This assumption has led to the development of wellness tourism, which focuses on enhancing the psychological, spiritual, and emotional well-being of customers [31].

2.2. Online Reviews and Tourism

The tourism and hospitality industry requires a high-speed and effective technology infrastructure as well as software applications to facilitate tourism development as it enables customer and supplier system integration into a single source to facilitate a wide range of operations, including selection of the products, placing orders, fulfilling orders, order management, payment and reporting, and using a single, intuitive interface [32]. In tourism and hospitality, reviews of online customers—with the growth of technology and Internet usage—and digital data are becoming increasingly available online for a wide range of products and services [33]. Travelers consider reviews and ratings from other tourists when choosing a destination when visiting the website of the destination or using social networking sites [34]. Furthermore, diverse Internet data have been exploited for the purpose of generating new insights for industries and business intelligence. For example, an aspect-oriented comparative analysis was conducted by Gao et al. to analyze the competitive advantages of competing restaurants using online customer reviews [35]. Additionally, Xiang et al. employed online hotel visitor reviews to analyze facets relating to the experience of customers and their relationships with their satisfaction [36]. Several recent studies have demonstrated the significant importance of analyzing customer reviews online for the industry’s development, offering new perspectives and suggestions for research [37]. Studies have shown that customer reviews provide valuable textual data that can be used to identify hidden topics and information important for various business intelligence purposes [38].
Tourism has long been recognized as a domain that relies heavily upon information and communication technology to manage operations on a day-to-day basis [39,40,41]. Nevertheless, Web 2.0 is a relatively recent term that refers to the second phase of development of the World Wide Web [18]. UGC, or user-generated content, is considered a central component of Web 2.0, as it is created by consumers and puts them at the center of information creation [18]. Managing UGC is best accomplished by actively promoting it through specialized user-generated marketing channels, such as the word-of-mouth protocol. Tourism is greatly impacted by word-of-mouth, fundamentally due to the intangible nature of tourism services [42]. As a result, online word-of-mouth can reduce the amount of chance, ambiguity, and uncertainty associated with a product or service [43]. Although the foregoing studies examine these statistics sources as components that impact the perceived image of a tourism destination, there is an absence of explanation regarding how this affects destination trust, particularly when it comes to wellness, where uncertainty and adverse effects are prevalent.
The service offered is unique in that it involves both the purchase and consumption of intangible goods simultaneously, setting it apart from typical services [44,45]. Due to the potential risks involved, customers are increasingly looking for precise and useful information that can help them minimize the chances of failure. These days, in addition to the limited information that they receive from those around them, people will be able to hear more varied and specific opinions via the Internet, allowing them to compare and contrast different points of view from a wider group of experienced individuals [46]. Customers tend to place greater reliance on reviews from fellow customers when buying experience products compared to general merchandise due to the nature of the products and the importance of first-hand experiences in informing purchase decisions [47,48]. Compared to information provided by companies, online reviews tend to be more detailed, provide a more accurate representation of the product or service, and are generally perceived as more trustworthy [49]. Thus, customers are more sympathetic to their own perspectives than to the advertising content offered by the company.

2.3. Big Data Analytics

The phrase “big data analysis” pertains to the examination of vast quantities of both organized and unorganized data available on the Internet [50]. The popularity of sentiment analysis for analyzing business performance is growing rapidly, particularly in analyzing large online datasets [51]. The purpose of this technique is to determine how users feel about a product or service [52], and the results of these surveys can be useful to managers in determining what the true feelings of customers are. Through sentiment analysis, researchers have been able to draw meaningful conclusions from the massive, unstructured online data, partly owning to the rapid technological advancements [53]. Recently, sentiment analysis has been applied to hotel customer satisfaction data, which is a relatively new method of analyzing data.
Questionnaires have been the primary method for conducting customer satisfaction research [54,55]. Several techniques were employed during the study to perform sentiment analysis, such as utilizing both R language and RStudio software. Despite their similarity, they are not identical, and therefore, a clear distinction must be made before using them together [56]. As stated on the GitHub RStudio site, R is a programming language that is optimized for statistical computing, whereas RStudio is an IDE that allows users to work with R seamlessly. Aside from this, while the R language can function on its own, it is recommended to use RStudio in conjunction with R for optimal results [57]. Borgatti, Freeman, and Everett have stated that UCINET is a software program that is designed to analyze network relationships, especially in social science research [58]. Hanneman and Riddle’s book also introduced the UCINET dataset as an innovative method for storing datasets. In the example, two different files were included: file.##h, a dataset containing information about the header; and file.##d, which contained lines of data [59]. Researchers in the hospitality field employ the UCINET software for conducting sentiment analysis [60]. The general concept of semantic network analysis involves studying the semantic structure of information by analyzing the correlation between the frequency of words and the order in which they appear in a sentence without assigning specific meanings to them; this type of analysis often involves examining the frequency of keywords on the web and evaluating the relationship between these keywords and the network structure, as well as their link status [61].
Based on previous research [62,63,64], the network analysis literature has discussed two basic centralities to determine node power in the network: the Eigenvector centrality and the Freeman-degree centrality. Eigenvector centrality is based on the concept that degree differences propagate throughout a network, which enhances the concept of connective centrality by taking into account not only the number of words linked, but also the importance of those connections [65]. Freeman’s centrality is defined as how many direct relationships a word has, the greater the degree of centrality, and the more connections that a word has with other nodes in the network [66]. In terms of Eigenvector centrality, it is based on the fact that differences in degree may propagate throughout a network and thus enhances the concept of connective centrality by taking into account not only the number of words connected, but also the significance of a connected relationship [65].
A CONCOR analysis was conducted to cluster the identified centralized words and to extract different attributes describing the customer experience [67,68]. By using the CONCOR analysis, one can analyze text in terms of meaning structure, using a “keyword” co-occurrence matrix to uncover hidden subgroups and relationships among the groups. Subjects are grouped by combining the inverse and matrix of the subjects [69]. In order to determine the vital words based on semantic network analysis, quantitative analysis was performed using exploratory factor analysis and linear regression analysis. As a result, a quantitative analysis of the variables reflecting customer experience and their relationship with customer satisfaction was conducted. This process included the use of a dummy variable to convert qualitative data to quantitative data [36]. Based on the previous literature, and the conducted linear regression analysis in this study, the following hypotheses were formulated:
Hypothesis 1 (H1).
Wellness has a positive impact on customer satisfaction at South Korean Wellness Destinations.
Hypothesis 2 (H2).
Tangible has a positive impact on customer satisfaction at South Korean Wellness Destinations.
Hypothesis 3 (H3).
Value has a positive impact on customer satisfaction at South Korean Wellness Destinations.
Hypothesis 4 (H4).
F&B has a positive impact on customer satisfaction at South Korean Wellness Destinations.
Hypothesis 5 (H5).
Purpose has a positive impact on customer satisfaction at South Korean Wellness Destinations.
Hypothesis 6 (H6).
Service has a positive impact on customer satisfaction at South Korean Wellness Destinations.

3. Methodology

The utilization of big data in this study was driven by limitations in the survey method’s ability to explore a more diverse set of outcomes. In this study, both qualitative and quantitative methods were used. This study employed three primary procedures for data analysis. As can be seen in Figure 1, three processes were used in this study. To begin with, the data-containing sentences were subjected to pre-processing using text mining techniques. During this stage, the data were divided into individual words based on their frequency. The data collection process was conducted using a sophisticated platform for data crawling and text mining known as SCTM 3.0, which is commonly referred to as smart crawling and text mining. Next, to analyze the data, RStudio was used to identify the most frequently used words and create a matrix. Then, we conducted two types of analyses—Freeman’s degree and Eigenvector—to understand which words were most important in the dataset. We also used UCINET to analyze the importance of these words and CONCOR analyses to see how they were related to each other. This helped us to understand people’s perceptions and understandings of wellness tourism destinations in South Korea by showing us which aspects were most important and how they were related to each other.
The top-frequency words selected by the author underwent semantic network analysis, which was carried out with the specific criterion of considering only those words relevant to the research topic. Generally, semantic network analysis is performed using a co-occurrence matrix (keyword by keyword) of words with the highest frequency [70]. Additionally, for analyzing the data and visualizing the results, the study employed Ucinet 6.0 along with Netdraw as a package. As a final step, a quantitative analysis was conducted based on factor analysis as well as linear regression analysis to determine the factors that reflect customer experience and their relationship with customer satisfaction. A customer satisfaction rating of 1 star representing the most dissatisfied customer, and a customer satisfaction rating of 5 stars representing the most satisfied customer was used in this study.
To identify the factors that influence customer satisfaction levels, review data from wellness destinations in South Korea were collected from Google Travel. There are 21 destinations listed on the Korea Tourism Organization Official website (www.visitkorea.com; accessed on 1 February 2023). To refine the dataset, online reviews that only presented a score without any written feedback were deleted; the clean review number stood at 24,650. The study exclusively focused on destinations that had received more than 310 reviews (310 reviews was the mean number of 24,650—the total number of all the reviews), thus only 11 wellness destinations were selected in this study, with a total number of 24,060 reviews, as shown in Table 1.

4. Result

4.1. Data Pre-Processing

From the text mining process, 24,060 reviews with 640,820 word frequencies were collected and calculated. To assess the level of customer satisfaction, Table 2 presents a breakdown of the frequency of numerical ratings spanning from 1 star to 5 stars. The average satisfaction rating was 4.41 out of 5 stars, and 84% of reviewers indicated that they were very satisfied with their experience in South Korea’s wellness tourism destinations, posting a rating of 4 stars or 5 stars. According to the data, 9% of customers rated their stays as unsatisfactory, with a rating of 3 stars. Moreover, 7% of customers gave a rating of either 1 star or 2 stars, which suggests they were not content with their experiences.
The frequencies of the words’ appearances in the valid comments were used as the basis for determining their rankings. Table 3 displays the extraction and sorting of the 60 most frequently occurring words that were indicative of the customer experience. The top frequency words were selected based on their close relationship to the subject of the research [67]. The ranking of words was determined by their proportionate frequency in the comments, which was calculated using the overall frequency of the words.
Table 3 displays the high visibility of words such as “good”, “relax”, “hotel”, “room”, and “place”, which appeared frequently in the comments. For example, “good” was mentioned 13,957 times, “relax” 6592 times, “hotel” 6562 times, and so on. Figure 2 illustrates the network of the most frequent words, with intertwined and complex connections between them.
Topics could be identified manually from texts, but overlapping words between topics were challenging to comprehend [71]. The word segmentation list was inadequate in reflecting certain aspects of customers’ experiences, necessitating the use of a data-driven method to discover the internal meaning and relationship among the words [67]. As a result, a semantic network analysis of these high-frequency words was executed to acquire a more comprehensive understanding of the latent meaning conveyed in the textual reviews [67].

4.2. Semantic Network Analysis

Semantic network analysis is a type of network analysis that focuses on paired associations based on shared meaning rather than behavior or perceptions of communication [72]. This method involves examining the interconnections among concepts that are situated in close proximity to one another [73]. By linking these concepts together, semantic network analysis offers valuable insights into texts, allowing researchers to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying meaning and connections between different ideas [74]. Freeman’s degree centrality and Eigenvector centrality were employed to gauge the proximity of each word to the center of the network in order to analyze these top frequency words [75]. Semantic network analysis is a powerful tool for uncovering the hidden meanings and relationships among concepts within a given context. Furthermore, this technique enables an examination of word frequency and clustering to comprehend how a specific word impacts relationships within a group, as well as the inter-group relationships [61,76]. As a result, semantic network analysis provides a powerful theoretical and methodological basis for describing the semantics of online reviews [70].
In a general sense, Freeman’s degree centrality calculates the level of interconnectivity among nodes within a network, while Eigenvector centrality is a valuable tool for identifying the most significant nodes within a network [62]; at the end of the analysis, clustering analysis was conducted in conjunction with the CONCOR analysis. CONCOR (CONvergence of iterated CORrelation) is a technique used to identify the degree of similarity between keywords by performing correlation analysis repeatedly. Furthermore, this technique is capable of identifying blocks of nodes by utilizing the correlation coefficient between metrics of concurrent keywords. As a result, clusters are formed that include keywords that are similar [77]. Hence, Table 4 presents a comparison of the centralities (Freeman’s degree and Eigenvector centrality) with the frequencies of the top 60 most frequently used words. In terms of their centrality ranking, Freeman’s degree centrality and Eigenvector centrality exhibit similar distribution patterns, with their centrality values being nearly equal.
According to the results, “good”, “relax”, and “hotel” recorded the highest degree and eigenvector centrality. Regarding the measures of degree centrality and eigenvector centrality, the words “calm”, “nature”, and “forest” were ranked lower than in terms of frequency. Moreover, the words “rest” and “walk” were rated higher in terms of the degree of centrality and the eigenvector centrality. The data revealed that despite reviewers using some words less frequently, these words still held significant weight and contributed to the network’s overall structure and impact. Overall, centrality analysis identifies significant words within a semantic network in order to facilitate a more precise understanding of the hidden meaning and relationships among these nodes.
CONCOR-enabled semantic network analysis revealed identifiable clusters that were associated with reviewers’ experiences of wellness tourism destinations in South Korea. The resulting clusters generated from the semantic networking were named based on the CONCOR clustering method, which took into account the keywords and their respective meanings as expressed in the original reviews. A visual representation of the CONCOR analysis is shown in Figure 3. To facilitate the identification of words belonging to each cluster, the clustered words and those of note are compiled into Table 5.
As a result, the analysis of online customer reviews generated four distinct clusters. First was the “Hospitality-oriented Cluster”, which included terms such as “Room”, “Staff”, “Stay”, “Facility”, etc. These words were expressed in reviews in the following manner: “The room was clean, overall the facilities and the staff were amazing”, “I recommend staying here. The food in the restaurant was so delicious!”, “The admission was quite expensive but I think it was worth it”, etc. These expressions are hospitality related.
The second cluster, “Destination-oriented Cluster” presented words such as “Hotel”, “Place”, “Spa”, and “Resort”. These words were associated with destinations. There were several examples of them in the reviews, including the following: “The deck path is calm and made for walking through a peaceful forest. Baby strollers are fine. It looks like a perfect family vacation destination.”, “In the morning, there will be fewer people at the bay, whereas in the evening, there will be a lot of people watching the sunset.”, etc. The third cluster was “Nature-oriented cluster”, covering words such as “Nature”, “Scenery”, “Season”, and more, which are related to nature. For example, “The autumn leaves are especially beautiful, but there are many things to do in any season”, and “The scenery is equally stunning in every four seasons”.
The last cluster was named “Wellness-oriented Cluster”, since it contained many words related to wellness, such as “Calm”, “Healing”, “Mental”, “Relax”, “Rest”, etc. These words were also of relatively high frequency (e.g., “Relax” was used 6592 times and ranked at 2, “Healing” and “Calm” were used 3375 and 3361 time and ranked at 6 and 7, respectively. The following words were expressed in customer reviews as follows: “A great place for healing, very peaceful and calm, good for mental health”, “If you live in the metropolitan area, you must visit here. This is really calm-maintained, great for walking or resting. It’s quiet and nice.”, etc.

4.3. Factor Analysis

Factor analysis is a statistical technique that can reveal the underlying patterns and relationships among keywords based on the variances of keywords within an online review. Using oblique rotation, factor analysis reduces numerous variables into smaller factors. For the extraction of factors, common factorial criteria were used, and the minimum factor loading in the final model was set at 0.400. Additionally, the factors must have Eigenvalues greater than 1.0 and must explain a substantial portion of the variance. According to the results, 22 key words within six factors contributed 91.020% of the variance. These factors were then used as independent variables to derive the customer satisfaction factors that were important. According to Table 6, the KMO index was 0.666, close to 0.700, meaning that it was fundamentally based on the recommended value. In Bartlett’s sphericity test, χ2 was 1473.065, with the overall significance of the correlation matrix p < 0.001, which in other words indicated that the use of factor analysis was appropriate for this study.

4.4. Linear Regression Analysis

After conducting the factor analysis, a linear regression analysis was performed to examine the relationship between guest experiences and satisfaction, which can be observed in Table 7. The linear regression analysis had six independent variables: Wellness (W), Tangible (T), Value (V), F&B (FB), Purpose (P), and Service (S). All the variance explained by six variables were 44.44% (R2 = 0.444). All variables were significant at 0.01. However, three factors, namely, “Value” (ß = −0.807, p < 0.001), “F&B” (ß = −0.192, p < 0.001), and “Service” (ß = −0.054, p < 0.001) were negative impacts to the customer average satisfaction rating based upon its standardized coefficient values.
There was a number of reviews written by guests that indicated a lack of satisfaction with the factor “Value”, which ranked first for the beta value with a negative impact on customer satisfaction, such as “It doesn’t seem worth it to pay more to use the other facility when it’s already so pricey to stay here”. Price is perceived by the customer in accordance with quality, resulting in satisfaction or dissatisfaction [77]. Customers are satisfied when they perceive the price as fair, but perceived price fairness may be negatively affected by the customer’s vulnerability [78,79].
There was also a number of reviews written by guests that indicated a lack of satisfaction with the “Food and Beverage”, and “Service” factors. Some examples of reviews are as follows: “We were unable to get information due to the fact that the staff could not speak English well”. Additionally, a lack of variety of food was mentioned quite often when visiting destinations with restaurants: “there were not a lot of food options.”
There were also positive impacts on customer satisfaction from the three other variables, namely, “Wellness” (ß = 0.259, p < 0.001), “Tangible” (ß = 0.142, p < 0.05), and “Purpose”, as indicated by reviews such as the following: “I enjoyed the spa very much, it was very relaxing and calming, exactly what I needed for my mental and physical health”; “The room was very comfortable, I loved the pool, I’d definitely recommend this resort”; “Walking around the park was very healing and enjoyable”. By focusing on positive aspects of Wellness, Tangible, and Purpose, more guests are inclined to trust wellness tourism destinations.

5. Discussion

In this research, big data were analyzed through semantic network analysis of 60 words. The analysis emphasized the use of centrality measures (Freeman’s degree centrality and Eigenvector centrality), proximity analysis, and CONCOR analysis. For visualization purposes, UCINET 6.0 packaged with Netdraw was employed. “Good” was ranked as the most frequent word. CONCOR analysis was conducted in order to categorize Internet users’ understandings and awareness of the Internet. As a result of these data, the implications for empirical applications were clarified. Eleven wellness tourism destinations in South Korea were selected for this study. In the CONCOR analysis, there were four clusters, which were “Hospitality”, “Destination”, “Nature”, and “Wellness”.
The cluster related to destinations included the word “spa”, but the quantitative analysis revealed distinct factors that impacted guest satisfaction/dissatisfaction. The outcomes of the linear regression analysis revealed that the wellness factor had the highest beta value with a positive impact, indicating its significance in determining guest satisfaction for Korean wellness tourism. This factor comprised keywords such as “healing”, “calm”, “relax”, “mental”, and “spa.” The words identified through frequency analysis were closely related to the research topic of wellness tourism and were positioned accordingly in the analysis results. Thus, even though the word “spa” is a destination-oriented word, it had a significant impact on the wellness factor. This study could lead to new insights into the research of wellness tourism by using online guest reviews. The purpose of this study was to gather qualitative and quantitative data to support research and development in the field of wellness tourism. The present study’s findings emphasize the crucial attributes of Korean wellness tourism as perceived by its customers through online reviews. Based on this, sharing recommendations and examples with managers of wellness tourism destinations could be advantageous in attracting and retaining clients in the future.
The Global Wellness Institute (GWI) conducted an assessment of the wellness economy in its 2018 Global Wellness Economy Monitor. The world has undergone significant changes and disturbances in recent years, experiencing a period of robust growth (2017–2019) followed by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. It is particularly important and compelling to provide an update on the global wellness economy now, as 2020 has become a watershed year that will forever divide history into “before” and “after” COVID-19. The pandemic certainly had a negative impact on wellness tourism. Likewise, with the wellness tourism destination managers, the Korean government is making significant efforts to revitalize its wellness tourism industry. Based on the factor analysis, the examined factors such as Value, Food and Beverage, and Service, which dissatisfied customers, would be the basis for developing a marketing strategy relative to these factors. Therefore, managers should devote more attention to improving these aspects, since the majority of their customers were more concerned with these dimensions, and in this case were dissatisfied.
The three other variables (Wellness, Tangible, and Purpose) are significant contributors to improving the quality of wellness tourism. The analysis of reviews conducted in this study can serve as a valuable foundation for formulating effective marketing strategies for wellness destinations in South Korea. The findings of this study can guide wellness destinations in South Korea on areas that need improvement and maintenance. In addition to analyzing the customer reviews of their competitors, managers can use this method to benchmark their customer satisfaction levels against those of their competitors. The reviews analyzed in this study can be utilized to inform strategic marketing decisions aimed at achieving a sustainable competitive advantage by identifying areas that require improvement and maintenance. Although the wellness industry is expanding at a fast pace globally, there has been minimal research conducted on this particular sector. In a crowded market, broad conceptualizations of well-being may provide significant opportunities for destinations to gain competitiveness and thus prolong their lifespan [80]. Most of the research on wellness tourism has centered on tourists who partake in activities such as visiting spas, using health products, or receiving medical services [81], and although there has been considerable research on traditional health care and recreational health care, only a few studies have been conducted regarding wellness hotels, which are considered to be one of the most prominent segments of wellness tourism in the engagement of tourists with spas, health products, or medical service [82]. Despite the limited research on wellness tourism, it is evident that this sector plays a significant role in promoting the well-being of many individuals [83].
There has been considerable research conducted in the field of wellness tourism and guest satisfaction. However, there is still no precedent for studies on wellness tourism in South Korea that utilize big data. The aim of this study was to investigate the various aspects that contribute to the customer experience and establish a correlation between customer experience and satisfaction. The research data sources selected for this study were wellness tourism destinations, and online customer reviews of these places were collected as part of the research process. Additionally, the integration of text mining, semantic network analysis, and quantitative analysis techniques was utilized to reveal implicit meanings and connections among the gathered reviews.
Previous studies that analyzed online customer reviews have used smaller datasets compared to the one used in this study. For instance, one study applied the same method but used less than 5000 reviews. For example, one illustration of the study’s specificity is its focus on online reviews of a single theme hotel, namely, the Hong Kong Disneyland Hotel [33] with 655 reviews. Research that examined customer reviews and satisfaction with an upscale hotel in Dubai [51] included 2051 reviews, and another study that analyzed cruiser reviews to understand their experience and satisfaction [70] collected 665 reviews for cruise tourism in Asia. However, small sample sizes have a greater likelihood of exhibiting selection biases and estimation biases. This results in incorrect analysis results that may differ from the real situations and generalized conclusions. Previous studies that used smaller datasets revealed that some of the categories that were identified may be typical only of a certain destination and may not apply to the entire market or industry. As a result, a larger sample size is recommended for future research [33]. In order to avoid these problems, we used a larger dataset in this paper (24,060 reviews were analyzed). In addition, this study did not focus on one destination but on 11 destinations recommended by the Korea Tourism Organization, thereby making it more generalized to the entire wellness industry market in South Korea.
In concluding this study, it is important to consider and acknowledge some limitations that should be approached with caution. The intricacy and free-form nature of human language necessitated the use of more exact and scientific techniques to handle the data. Analyzing data in human language is challenging due to its intricate and unstructured nature, requiring more rigorous and scientific methods. Semantic network analysis proved to be among the most effective approaches in this study [75]. However, to gain a deeper understanding of our customers, advanced technology should be utilized to uncover any hidden information present in the text. In future research, it would be beneficial to use more advanced techniques based on data to analyze these reviews. However, it should be acknowledged that there may be a lack of objectivity, as data coding and interpretation are subject to the researcher’s knowledge, skill, and subjective judgment [84].

6. Conclusions

There were several steps involved in this study. A frequency analysis was conducted to determine the most influential words from all keywords. Subsequently, 60 words with the highest frequency were analyzed for degree and eigenvector centrality to identify their importance. The subsequent step in this study was to conduct a CONCOR analysis, which was employed to cluster the keywords. The findings of this analysis revealed that the top 60 keywords could be classified into four distinct groups. These keywords were grouped into four clusters, namely, “Hospitality”, “Destination”, “Nature”, and “Wellness”. In addition to keyword groups, UCINET’s NetDraw function was used to visualize nodes and networks.
After conducting a factor analysis, 22 words were divided into six categories, namely, “Wellness”, “Tangible”, “Value”, “F&B”, “Purpose”, and “Service”. There were six independent variables in the linear regression: Wellness (W), Tangible (T), Value (V), Food & Beverage (FB), Purpose (P), and Service (S). The total variance explained by the six variables was 44.4%, (R2 = 0.444). All variables were significant at 0.01. In terms of average guest satisfaction ratings, three factors, namely, “Value”, “Food and Beverage”, and “Service”, were negatively impacted by their standardized coefficient values. The findings of this research paper indicated that hypotheses 1, 2, and 5 were supported by the data, whereas hypotheses 3, 4, and 6 were not supported.
A wellness destination’s management team should pay more attention to dining, facilities, and prices in order to make visitors feel that the services provided are worthwhile, for example, focusing on improving the food quality, the cleanliness of the environment, and the friendliness of the staff. In contrast, all three variables of “Wellness”, “Tangible”, and “Purpose” positively influenced guest satisfaction. Wellness tourism destination managers in South Korea may utilize this finding to improve aspects in which guests remain dissatisfied. These details can be useful to guests as they provide information about quality and previous experiences.

Author Contributions

Supervision, H.-S.K.; Writing—original draft, A.L.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea and the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2022S1A5A2A03052622).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Global Wellness Institute. The Global Wellness Tourism Economy: Looking beyond COVID. Glob. Wellness Econ. Look. Beyond COVID December 2021 2021, 1–110. Available online: https://globalwellnessinstitute.org/press-room/press-releases/2021-gwi-research-report/ (accessed on 1 February 2023).
  2. Valentine, N.A. Wellness Tourism: Using Tourists’ Preferences to Evaluate The Wellness Tourism Market In Jamaica. Rev. Soc. Sci. 2016, 1, 25–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lee, A.H.; Guillet, B.D.; Law, R. Tourists’ Emotional Wellness and Hotel Room Colour. Curr. Issues Tour. 2018, 21, 856–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Olga, S.I.; Tessaring, M. Trends and Skill Needs in Tourism; Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, 2015; Available online: http://www.cedefop.europa.eu/EN/Files/5161_en.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  5. Stará, J.; Peterson, C. Understanding the Concept of Wellness for the Future of the Tourism Industry: A Literature Review. J. Tour. Serv. 2017, VIII, 9–25. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bushell, R.; Sheldon, P.J. Wellness Tourism and the Future. In Wellness and Tourism: Mind, Body, Spirit, Place; Cognizant Communication: Sydney, Australia, 2009; pp. 218–230. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, K.; Chang, F.; Tung, K. Measuring Wellness-Related Lifestyles. Tour. Anal. 2014, 19, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Smith, M.K.; Puczkó, L. Health and Wellness Tourism; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yeung, O.; Johnston, K. Global Spa & Wellness Economy Monitor. 2014, 46. Available online: https://globalwellnessinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/06/global-spa-and-wellness-economy-monitor-2014_fix4182016.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  10. Park, R.J. The Studies of Actual Condition and Therapeutic Effects of Hot Spring Water in Korea. J. Kor. Soc. Phys. Ther. 2000, 12, 369–377. [Google Scholar]
  11. Korea Tourism Organization. HIGH-END WELLNESS. Available online: https://english.visitkorea.or.kr/enu/index.kto (accessed on 1 February 2023).
  12. Ye, Q.; Law, R.; Gu, B. The Impact of Online User Reviews on Hotel Room Sales. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2009, 28, 180–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sparks, B.A.; Browning, V. The Impact of Online Reviews on Hotel Booking Intentions and Perception of Trust. Tour. Manag. 2011, 32, 1310–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Vermeulen, I.E.; Seegers, D. Tried and Tested: The Impact of Online Hotel Reviews on Consumer Consideration. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. World Health Organization. Constitution of the World Health Organization. Available online: www.who.int/about/who-we-are/constitution (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  16. National Institute Wellness. The Six Dimensions of Wellness. Available online: https://nationalwellness.org/ (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  17. Dunn, H.L. High-Level Wellness for Man and Society. Am. J. Public Health 1959, 49, 786–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dillette, A.K.; Douglas, A.C.; Andrzejewski, C. Dimensions of Holistic Wellness as a Result of International Wellness Tourism Experiences. Curr. Issues Tour. 2021, 24, 794–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lim, Y.; Kim, H.; Lee, T. Visitor Motivational Factors and Level of Satisfaction in Wellness Tourism: Comparison Between First-Time Visitors and Repeat Visitors. Asia Pacific J. Tour. Res. 2016, 21, 137–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Voigt, C. Insights into Wellness Tourists: Segmentation by Benefits. Ph.D. Thesis, Lincoln University, Lincoln, New Zealand, 2008. Available online: http://www.lincoln.ac.nz/PageFiles/7235/Voigt.pdf (accessed on 10 February 2023).
  21. Zhong, L.; Deng, B.; Morrison, A.M.; Coca-Stefaniak, J.A.; Yang, L. Medical, Health and Wellness Tourism Research—A Review of the Literature (1970–2020) and Research Agenda. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 10875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Rommanova, G.; Vetitnev, A.; Dimanche, F. Health and Wellness Tourism. In Tourism in Russia: A Management Handbook; Emerald: Bingley, UK, 2015; pp. 231–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jolliffe, L.; Cave, J. Arts Tourism. Tour. Key Concepts 2015, 2012, 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chen, K.H.; Chang, F.H.; Kenny, C.W. Investigating the Wellness Tourism Factors in Hot Spring Hotel Customer Service. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2013, 25, 1092–1114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sharma, P.; Nayak, J.K. Testing the Role of Tourists’ Emotional Experiences in Predicting Destination Image, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions: A Case of Wellness Tourism. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2018, 28, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Smith, M.; Kelly, C. Holistic Tourism: Journeys of the Self? Tour. Recreat. Res. 2006, 31, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bennett, M.; King, B.; Milner, L. The Health Resort Sector in Australia: A Positioning Study. J. Vacat. Mark. 2004, 10, 122–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cohen, M.; Bodeker, G. Understanding the Global Spa Industry: Spa Management; Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  29. Medina-Muñoz, D.R.; Medina-Muñoz, R.D. Critical Issues in Health and Wellness Tourism: An Exploratory Study of Visitors to Wellness Centres on Gran Canaria. Curr. Issues Tour. 2013, 16, 415–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Stănciulescu, G.C.; Diaconescu, G.N.; Diaconescu, D.M. Economics Health, Spa, Wellness Tourism. What Is The Difference? Knowl. Horiz. 2015, 7, 158–161. [Google Scholar]
  31. Smith, M.; Kelly, C. Wellness Tourism. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2006, 31, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bethapudi, A. The Role of ICT in Tourism Industry. J. Appl. Econ. Bus. 2016, 1, 67–79. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhang, X.; Kim, H. Customer Experience and Satisfaction of Disneyland Hotel through Big Data Analysis of Online Customer Reviews. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Dedeoğlu, B.B.; Bilgihan, A.; Ye, B.H.; Wang, Y.; Okumus, F. The Role of Elaboration Likelihood Routes in Relationships between User-Generated Content and Willingness to Pay More. Tour. Rev. 2020, 76, 614–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Gao, S.; Tang, O.; Wang, H.; Yin, P. Identifying Competitors through Comparative Relation Mining of Online Reviews in the Restaurant Industry. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 71, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xiang, Z.; Schwartz, Z.; Gerdes, J.H.; Uysal, M. What Can Big Data and Text Analytics Tell Us about Hotel Guest Experience and Satisfaction? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 44, 120–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ahani, A.; Nilashi, M.; Ibrahim, O.; Sanzogni, L.; Weaven, S. Market Segmentation and Travel Choice Prediction in Spa Hotels through TripAdvisor’s Online Reviews. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 80, 52–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Köseoglu, M.A.; Mehraliyev, F.; Altin, M.; Okumus, F. Competitor Intelligence and Analysis (CIA) Model and Online Reviews: Integrating Big Data Text Mining with Network Analysis for Strategic Analysis. Tour. Rev. 2020, 76, 529–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Poon, A. Tourism, Technology and Competitive Strategies; CAB International: London, UK, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  40. Sheldon, P. Tourism Information Technology; CAB International: New York, NY, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  41. Rasoolimanesh, S.M.; Law, R.; Buhalis, D.; Cobanoglu, C. Guest Editorial. J. Hosp. Tour. Technol. 2019, 10, 481–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Casaló, L.V.; Flavián, C.; Guinalíu, M.; Ekinci, Y. Do Online Hotel Rating Schemes Influence Booking Behaviors? Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2015, 49, 28–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Bickart, B.; Schindler, R.M. Internet Forums As Influential. J. Interact. Mark. 2001, 15, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hunt, J.D. Image as a Factor in Tourism Development. J. Travel Res. 1975, 13, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Karri, V.R.S.; Dogra, J. Destination Stereotypes: A Phenomenon of Destination Image. J. Hosp. Tour. Insights 2022. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bhandari, R.; Bansal, A. A Study of Characteristics of E-WoM Affecting Consumer’s Social Media Opinion Behavior. J. Indian Manag. Strateg. 2019, 24, 33–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Klein, L.R. Evaluating the Potential of Interactive Media through a New Lens: Search versus Experience Goods. J. Bus. Res. 1998, 41, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Khokhar, S.; Shahid, M.; Hafeez, S.; Tufail, M.S. The Effect of Perceived Financial Risk on Purchase Intention in Pakistan. Int. J. Emerg. Mark. 2022. ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hu, N.; Zhang, T.; Gao, B.; Bose, I. What Do Hotel Customers Complain about? Text Analysis Using Structural Topic Model. Tour. Manag. 2019, 72, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sehgal, D.; Agarwal, A.K. Real-Time Sentiment Analysis of Big Data Applications Using Twitter Data with Hadoop Framework. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 2018, 584, 765–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wei, S.; Kim, H.S. Online Customer Reviews and Satisfaction with an Upscale Hotel: A Case Study of Atlantis, The Palm in Dubai. Information 2022, 13, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sohangir, S.; Wang, D.; Pomeranets, A.; Khoshgoftaar, T.M. Big Data: Deep Learning for Financial Sentiment Analysis. J. Big Data 2018, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Shayaa, S.; Jaafar, N.I.; Bahri, S.; Sulaiman, A.; Al-garadi, M.A.L.I. Sentiment Analysis of Big Data: Methods, Applications, and Open Challenges. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 37807–37827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Barsky, J.D. Customer Satisfaction in the Hotel Industry: Meaning and Measurement. J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 1992, 16, 51–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Afthanorhan, A.; Awang, Z.; Rashid, N.; Foziah, H.; Ghazali, P.L. Assessing the Effects of Service Quality on Customer Satisfaction. Manag. Sci. Lett. 2019, 9, 13–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Alaei, A.R.; Becken, S.; Stantic, B. Sentiment Analysis in Tourism: Capitalizing on Big Data. J. Travel Res. 2019, 58, 175–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mark, P.J.; Der Loo, V.; De Jonge, E. Learning RStudio for R Statistical Computing; Packt: Birmingham, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  58. Stiglic, G.; Watson, R.; Cilar, L. R You Ready? Using the R Programme for Statistical Analysis and Graphics. Res. Nurs. Health 2019, 42, 494–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Borgatti, S.; Everett, M.; Freeman, L. UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Anal. Technol. 2002, 6, 12–15. [Google Scholar]
  60. Shadiyar, A.; Ban, H.J.; Kim, H.S. Extracting Key Drivers of Air Passenger’s Experience and Satisfaction through Online Review Analysis. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lim, S.; Tucker, C.S.; Jablokow, K.; Pursel, B. A Semantic Network Model for Measuring Engagement and Performance in Online Learning Platforms. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 2018, 26, 1481–1492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Kim, H.S. An Exploratory Study on the Semantic Network Analysis of Food Tourism through the Big Data. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2017, 23, 22–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Aralbayeva, S.; Kim, H.S.; Tao, S. A Study of Comparison between Restraunt Industries in Seoul and Busan through Big Data Analytics. Culin. Sci. Hosp. Res. 2018, 24, 109–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Handani, N.D.; Riswanto, A.L.; Kim, H.S. A Study of Inbound Travelers Experience and Satisfaction at Quarantine Hotels in Indonesia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Information 2022, 13, 254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bonacich, P. Some Unique Properties of Eigenvector Centrality. Soc. Networks 2007, 29, 555–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Freeman, L.C. A Set of Measures of Centrality Based on Betweenness. Sociometry 1977, 40, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Bilgihan, A.; Seo, S.; Choi, J. Identifying Restaurant Satisfiers and Dissatisfiers: Suggestions from Online Reviews. J. Hosp. Mark. Manag. 2018, 27, 601–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kim, D.J.; Lee, S. A Study of Consumer Perception on Fashion Show Using Big Data Analysis. J. Fash. Bus. 2019, 23, 85–100. [Google Scholar]
  69. Park, C.; Lee, T.M. Information Direction, Website Reputation and EWOM Effect: A Moderating Role of Product Type. J. Bus. Res. 2009, 62, 61–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tao, S.; Kim, H.S. Cruising in Asia: What Can We Dig from Online Cruiser Reviews to Understand Their Experience and Satisfaction. Asia Pacific J. Tour. Res. 2019, 24, 514–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Jia, S.S. Behind the Ratings: Text Mining of Restaurant Customers’ Online Reviews. Int. J. Mark. Res. 2018, 60, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Doerfel, M. What Constitutes Semantic Network Analysis? A Comparison of Research and Methodologies. Connections 1998, 21, 16–26. [Google Scholar]
  73. Doerfel, M.L.; Moore, P.J. Digitizing Strength of Weak Ties: Understanding Social Network Relationships through Online Discourse Analysis. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 2016, 40, 127–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Shi, F.; Chen, L.; Han, J.; Childs, P. A Data-Driven Text Mining and Semantic Network Analysis for Design Information Retrieval. J. Mech. Des. Trans. ASME 2017, 139, 111402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Oh, M.; Kim, S. Dimensionality of Ethnic Food Fine Dining Experience: An Application of Semantic Network Analysis. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2020, 35, 100719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Zhang, L.; Yun, H.J. Tourism Information Contents and Text Networking (Focused on Formal Website of Jeju and Chinese Personal Blogs). J. Korea Cont. Asso 2018, 18, 19–30. [Google Scholar]
  77. Wasserman, S.; Faust, K. Social Network Analysis; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Oliver, R.L. Whence Consumer Loyalty? J. Mark. 1999, 63, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Herrmann, A.; Xia, L.; Kent, M.-B.; Huber, F. The Influence of Price Fairness on Customer Satisfaction: An Empirical Test in the Context of Automobile Purchases. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 2007, 16, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hartwell, H.; Fyall, A.; Willis, C.; Page, S.; Ladkin, A.; Hemingway, A. Progress in Tourism and Destination Wellbeing Research. Curr. Issues Tour. 2018, 21, 1830–1892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kelly, C. Wellness Tourism: Retreat Visitor Motivations and Experiences. Tour. Recreat. Res. 2012, 37, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Mueller, H.; Kaufmann, E.L. Wellness Tourism: Market Analysis of a Special Health Tourism Segment and Implications for the Hotel Industry. J. Vacat. Mark. 2001, 7, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Lagrosen, S.O.; Grundén, K. Social Media Marketing in the Wellness Industry. TQM J. 2014, 26, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Herjanto, H.; Amin, M.; Okumus, F.; Cobanoglu, C. Airline Service: Low-Cost-Carriers (LCCs) Failure and Passenger Emotional Experience. Tour. Rev. 2022, 77, 945–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The research processes.
Figure 1. The research processes.
Sustainability 15 06702 g001
Figure 2. Network visibility of top frequency words.
Figure 2. Network visibility of top frequency words.
Sustainability 15 06702 g002
Figure 3. Visualization of CONCOR Analysis.
Figure 3. Visualization of CONCOR Analysis.
Sustainability 15 06702 g003
Table 1. Number of reviews.
Table 1. Number of reviews.
NoDestinationNumber of
Reviews
Average
Satisfaction
1Hwadam Botanical Garden64474.3
2Damyang Juknokwon47434.4
3Suncheon Bay Wetlands44944.4
4Hanwha Resort Geoje Belvedere31274.4
5Jeju Bijarim Forest20564.6
6Seolhaewon8164.4
7Park Roche Resort & Wellness6534.5
8Tongyeong Cable Car5954.5
9The We Hotel Wellness Center4904.4
10Healience Seonmaeul3294.4
11Forest Resom Have 9 Healing Spa3104.3
Total24,060
Average Rating4.41
Table 2. Summary of overall satisfaction rating.
Table 2. Summary of overall satisfaction rating.
RatingFrequencyPercentCumulative Percent (%)
13772%2%
212225%7%
322659%16%
4600225%41%
514,19459%100%
total24,060100%
Average Rating4.41
Table 3. Frequency of the top 60 keywords of customers reviews.
Table 3. Frequency of the top 60 keywords of customers reviews.
RankWordsFreqRankWordsFreq
1good13,95731around904
2relax659232family885
3hotel656233fee816
4room502734feel796
5place478035pretty766
6healing337536children730
7calm336137expensive725
8nature326638restaurant715
9forest289839enjoy672
10rest287140pool626
11walk280541garden610
12like232742hot556
13quiet227643summer550
14nice226144admission513
15mental216445worth457
16scenery187146park419
17food148147stay419
18beautiful147648bay416
19time139249staff396
20great134750mountain392
21autumn134451fall391
22people124552season390
23resort121453sunset384
24recommend117454delicious381
25best113855spring379
26clean113056eat371
27facility112757price366
28view108358spa290
29comfortable98159breakfast270
30cool91160atmosphere244
Table 4. Comparison of word frequency and centrality.
Table 4. Comparison of word frequency and centrality.
FactorFrequencyDegreeEigenvector FrequencyDegreeEigenvector
FreqRankCoef.RankCoefRank FreqRankCoefRankCoefRank
good13,957121.955694210.4041971271around904313.980383158240.08061566223
relax6592217.2729339620.3350579442family885323.053624868330.0642812133
hotel6562315.9149541930.303213093fee816333.058741093320.0571023938
room5027415.5370883940.3018448654feel796343.228305578300.06644304132
place4780513.0148153350.259413575pretty766352.270119429390.04571900942
healing3375610.3295545660.2018513086children730363.042661667350.06119110436
calm336178.9986190890.1801793729expensive725372.634829521370.06247777935
nature326688.36786747110.16599653712restaurant715383.045585155340.05921194737
forest289898.088670731120.16763393610enjoy672393.07847476310.06311707934
rest2871109.31801414570.1819234798pool626402.60632515380.04951517340
walk2805119.00592708680.1950451287garden610412.1897223410.04398112443
like2327126.457342148160.14107188614hot556421.849862218450.03629882647
quiet2276137.485692978130.15508538513summer550432.088129759440.03966578845
nice2261146.501194954150.13761988316admission513442.091053247430.03916747546
mental2164158.515505791100.16626961511worth457451.50415504540.02816140155
scenery1871166.845440388140.13943700515park419461.730728507470.0330587750
food1481175.990308285170.1173379517stay419472.107132673420.04127917444
beautiful1476184.111941814230.08315692822bay416481.254193425570.02518464158
time1392195.227267742180.10440551518staff396491.595515251520.07765972625
great1347204.224497795210.09231692620mountain392501.704416752480.06986729131
autumn1344214.203301907220.07911389324fall391511.40621686550.02625649257
people1245224.633791447190.09431184819season390521.670796156490.03412912849
resort1214233.411026001290.07755222926sunset384531.055393577590.02162500759
recommend1174244.444493294200.08674142521delicious381541.575781465530.03010366354
best1138252.860671997240.05354874239spring379551.663487315500.03114904653
clean1130263.515542269270.07241705129eat371561.763618112460.03569130248
facility1127273.854671478260.07627463328price366571.615980029510.03214000951
view1083283.425643682280.07079743630spa290581.186952353580.03150384952
comfortable981293.87952137250.0769376927breakfast270591.271734595560.0277524856
cool911302.219688416300.04726057541atmosphere244600.966225922600.01975907460
Table 5. Summarization of words from CONCOR Analysis.
Table 5. Summarization of words from CONCOR Analysis.
Extracted WordsSignificant Words
Hospitality-oriented Clusteradmission/breakfast/eat/best/clean/
delicious/expensive/facility/fee/food/pool/recommend/
restaurant/room/staff/stay/worth
breakfast/eat/best/clean/
facility/fee/food/pool/
restaurant/room/staff/stay
Destination-oriented Clusteraround/bay/children/family/forest/
garden/hotel/mountain/park/
people/place/resort/spa/sunset
bay/forest/garden/hotel/
mountain/park/place/
resort/spa
Nature-oriented Clusteratmosphere/autumn/beautiful/cool/fall/hot/nature/scenery
/season/spring/summer/view
autumn/fall/nature/scenery/
season/spring/summer
Wellness-oriented Clustercalm/comfortable/enjoy/feel/good/
great/healing/like/mental/nice/
pretty/quiet/relax/rest/time/walk
calm/comfortable/healing/
mental/quiet/relax/rest
Table 6. Result of the factor analysis.
Table 6. Result of the factor analysis.
FactorWordsFactor LoadingEigen ValueCum. Variance
Wellnesshealing0.9324.39719.988
calm0.917
relax0.902
mental0.899
spa0.888
Tangiblepool0.9184.13338.776
hotel0.893
room0.882
resort0.876
park0.859
Valueworth0.9953.76855.904
fee0.928
feel0.925
price0.913
F&Brestaurant0.9772.95469.332
breakfast0.972
food0.966
Purposewalk0.9352.83482.214
enjoy0.929
stay0.923
Servicestaff0.9551.93791.020
facility0.940
KMO (Kaiser Meyer Olkin) = 0.666
Bartlett chi-square (p) = 1473.065 (p < 0.001)
Table 7. Result linear regression analysis.
Table 7. Result linear regression analysis.
ModelUnstandardized CoefStandardized Coefpt
BStd. ErrorBeta
(Constant)2.4800.121 0.00020.551 ***
Wellness0.4600.1220.2590.0003.774 ***
Tangible0.2510.1220.1420.0452.062 *
Value−1.4320.122−0.8070.000−11.747 ***
F&B−0.3410.122−0.1920.008−2.798 **
Purpose0.2500.1220.1410.0462.055 *
Service−0.0960.122−0.0540.436−0.786
Dependent variable: Customer Satisfaction (CS); R2 = 0.444; adjusted R2 = 0.443; F = 633.654; * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Riswanto, A.L.; Kim, H.-S. An Investigation of the Key Attributes of Korean Wellness Tourism Customers Based on Online Reviews. Sustainability 2023, 15, 6702. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086702

AMA Style

Riswanto AL, Kim H-S. An Investigation of the Key Attributes of Korean Wellness Tourism Customers Based on Online Reviews. Sustainability. 2023; 15(8):6702. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086702

Chicago/Turabian Style

Riswanto, Aura Lydia, and Hak-Seon Kim. 2023. "An Investigation of the Key Attributes of Korean Wellness Tourism Customers Based on Online Reviews" Sustainability 15, no. 8: 6702. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086702

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop