Next Article in Journal
Play to Learn: A Game to Improve Seismic-Risk Perception
Previous Article in Journal
The Effectiveness of Educational Robots in Improving Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Organic–Inorganic Nanocomposites of Aspergillus terreus Extract and Its Compounds with Antimicrobial Properties

1
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Ankara 06560, Turkey
2
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Agri Ibrahim Cecen University, Agri 04100, Turkey
3
Department of Seafood Processing Technology, Faculty of Fisheries, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University, Rize 53100, Turkey
4
Department of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Lokman Hekim University, Ankara 06510, Turkey
5
Department of Analytical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Erciyes University, Kayseri 38039, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(5), 4638; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054638
Submission received: 3 December 2022 / Revised: 16 February 2023 / Accepted: 3 March 2023 / Published: 5 March 2023

Abstract

:
Due to its distinct, atypical features and possible applications, three-dimensional (3D) hierarchical nanoflowers have sparked considerable interest. Copper (II) ions were employed as inorganic components in this study, whereas various extracts from Aspergillus terreus and their extracted main components were used as organic components. Extracts from A. terreus and its isolated principal component molecules can first form complexes with copper ions, and these complexes subsequently become nucleation sites for primary copper phosphate crystals, showing interactions using an easy and successful self-assembly template synthesis technique. Therefore, the process results in the formation of 3D nanoflowers among the A. terreus extract and its remoted important additives in addition to copper ions, ensuing in a completely unique round flower-like shape containing loads of nanopetals under the most excellent conditions along with pH, attention of organic–inorganic additives, temperature, and the quantity of copper nitrate on nanoflower formation. Furthermore, A. terreus and its isolated major components, Cu3(PO4)2 nanoflowers, seemed to have a remarkable antibacterial effect. Our findings highlight the benefits of nanoflowers made with A. terreus and its isolated secondary metabolites of inorganic structures, which could be used in industrial biocatalysts, biosensors, and environmental chemistry.

1. Introduction

Seas and oceans comprise a wide diversity of species with biologically active secondary metabolites that have been proven to be rich and promising sources of new and novel bioactive natural products with potential pharmaceutical significance.
During the search for new drug sources for the treatment of different diseases, marine natural compounds have been found to play an important role in directing drug discovery research. For this reason, the research studies in this area have been increasing extensively in recent years [1].
Along with the diseases that have changed over time, the active ingredients of drugs used in the treatment of diseases also change. As a result of the incorrect use of antibiotics, the existence of drug-resistant microorganisms has become one of the biggest public health problems today. Among the drugs needed for public health, new antimicrobial drugs targeting bacteria and fungi resistant to existing antimicrobials are at the top. The fact that more than half of the antibiotics approved by the FDA are natural or derived from natural compounds shows that natural sources are important for the search for new antibiotic-active substances [2].
Discovery efforts of bioactive natural compounds have shifted from terrestrial sources to marine sources. Because of the extreme, unusual, and compelling environmental factors of the marine habitat, organisms, such as sponges, corals, algae, etc., produce different secondary metabolites to the outcome of these challenging conditions. More than 50% of identified marine natural compounds are only isolated from marine sources. Similar to marine organisms, marine fungi also adapt themselves in marine habitats by producing a variety of secondary metabolites, which is not seen in their terrestrial counterparts. Marine fungi can be found in all marine habitats and can be isolated from many different sources. Endophytic fungi cohabiting with marine organisms are a valuable candidate for a sustainable drug discovery process. Numerous new compounds have been isolated from many marine organisms. In the case of uncontrolled collection of marine organisms for secondary metabolite isolation, some species will be ecologically endangered, as evidenced in terrestrial samples. Marine fungi overcome these concerns and are a sustainable source of active substances. Yield enhancement of the desired metabolite through media manipulation, biotic and abiotic elicitors, incubation interval, genetic engineering approaches, etc., can be achieved. When the activities of marine-derived compounds were examined, it was determined that the antimicrobial activity was the second most observed activity with 13% after the anticancer activity [3].
Fungi from marine sources are significant sources of bioactive compounds for the drug discovery process. Together with cephalosporins, one of the most famous examples of bioactive compounds, marine fungi have been shown to offer unique chemicals of clinical significance [4]. Marine-derived fungi have produced a number of substances with unusual chemical structures and bioactivity [5,6]. Many compounds with various bioactivities, such as anticancer, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antidiabetic, antiviral, antioxidant, antifungal, and antimycobacterial activity, have been obtained from marine-derived A. terreus fungus in different studies [7]. Butyrolactone I has significant antimycobacterial activity [8], potent antifouling activity [9], and significant inhibitory activity against α-glucosidase [10], while butyrolactone III shows significant antioxidant activity [11]. Several plant extracts and active compounds are used in the production of metallic nanoparticles as organic reducing and stabilizing agents [12,13]. Antimicrobial activity of butyrolactone I derivates from Aspergillus terreus and has been reported against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria as well as fungi [14]. The antimicrobial effects of the compounds can be further enhanced by synthesizing them with silver nanoparticles. Significant antibacterial activity of AgNPs at different concentrations synthesized using A. terreus was reported against all bacterial strains tested, and it was also reported that the antimicrobial activity of these AgNPs differed according to the concentration and bacterial species [15]. The antimicrobial effects of extracts differ according to various factors, such as extract method, concentration, and tested bacteria. Additionally, the high phenolic and flavonoid content in the extracts may also affect the antimicrobial activity [16]. Therefore, it is extremely important to identify compounds with higher antimicrobial properties and apply them in various fields such as including pharmaceuticals, food preservation, natural therapies, and alternative medicine.
Nanodendrites [17,18,19], core–shell nanoparticles [20,21,22], nanobullets [23,24,25], nanotubes [26,27,28,29], nanowires [30,31,32,33], nanozymes [34,35,36,37,38,39], and nanoflowers [40,41,42,43,44,45] have received a lot of attention, and significant progress in this area of research has been achieved in recent years. “Nanoflower” is a great term for certain nanomaterials with microscopic images that resemble flowers. Carbon [46,47,48], metals and other elemental materials [49,50,51], alloys [52,53], and metaloxides/hydroxides [54,55,56] are among the materials that have been observed to produce “flower-like formations” [57,58,59,60,61]. These nanoflowers have an extensive variety of applications in catalysis, magnetism, nanodevices, sensing and biosensing, and medicine because of their enormous surface/volume ratio compared to bulk materials [62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69]. Nanoflowers, on the other hand, are frequently created under extreme circumstances, such as high temperatures, pressure, and the use of dangerous chemical solvents. As a result, developing a low-cost, straightforward synthetic approach for producing hierarchical nanoflowers remains a challenge. Consequently, self-assembled pattern synthesis provides a simple and efficient low-temperature synthetic method for producing well-defined nanoflowers. Bioinspired materials with microscale and nanoscale have been highlighted as a key development in the design of functional materials [70,71,72] due to the tremendous leadership of biomolecules in guiding and creating nanoflowers. Biomolecules such as enzymes [73,74,75,76,77,78], proteins [79], and amino acids [80] were used to make nanoflower. For the first time, Zare’s group outlined the creation of hybrid nanoflowers made of Cu3(PO4)2 and proteins, as well as the production of immobilized enzymes with significantly improved activity [81]. Wang et al. (2013) then used the same synthesis procedure to make CaHPO4-a-amylase nanoflowers, as well as clarifying the mechanism underlying the immobilized enzyme’s improved catalytic activity [82]. Though biodegradable amphiphilic molecules have been widely used throughout nanomaterial manufacturing, the self-assembly process facilitated by amphiphilic molecules can provide a potent low-temperature tool for the creation of hierarchical structures, bio-surfactants have not been widely reported in the fabrication of nanoflowers [83,84].
Using copper (II) ions as the inorganic component and different extracts from Aspergillus terreus and its isolated major components as the organic component, this study describes a simple and successful self-assembled template synthesis technique for three-dimensional (3D) flower-like Cu3(PO4)2 nanostructures. The hybrid nanoflowers were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). For some bacteria, the produced hybrid nanoflowers showed exceptional antibacterial activity.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

2.1.1. Fungal Material

A. terreus fungus was isolated from the Spirorbis sp., which was obtained by biolog Bülent Gözcelioğlu from Marmara Sea in 2018. For identification, this fungus was cultured on Sabouraud 4% dextrose agar (SDA, Merck, Germany) at room temperature for a week in an incubator (Nüve, Turkey). The fungus was identified as Aspergillus terreus (GenBank accession number MT273950) based on DNA amplification and ITS (internal transcribed spacer) sequencing data analysis [85].

2.1.2. Chemical Material and Reagents

All chemicals were provided by Sigma-Aldrich Products, St. Louis, MO, USA. Chromatographic separation procedures were performed by applying column chromatography with stationary phases as silica gel 60 M (0.04–0.063 mm). For screening purposes, ready-made silica gel 60 F254 Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used. Ethyl acetate (EtOAc) Ph. Eur., BP, NF with >99.5% purity, Petroleum Ether boiling range 40–60 °C, with >75.0% purity, Dichloromethane (DCM) Ph. Eur., NF with >99.0% purity was used for fermentation and secondary metabolite isolation processes.

2.1.3. Extraction of Aspergillus Terreus

Solid rice medium was prepared and sterilized by autoclave for cultivation of fungal strain. Pieces of fungus in Petri dishes were transferred to Erlenmeyer flasks containing the medium. Fermentation process continued for 4 weeks at room temperature in dark and under static conditions.
To end fermentation process, 350 mL (EtOAc) was added to each flask. Flasks were placed in orbital shaker for 12 h before filtering, and EtOAc filtrate was gathered and vaporized under optimized vaccuum until obtaining crude extract (16.41 g). Separation of crude extract by liquid–liquid extraction and fractionation process was completed according to the previous methodology [85].

2.1.4. Isolation of Butyrolactone I and Butyrolactone III

Obtained fractions from fungi extract were applied to chromatographic methods. Second fraction (DCM 100%) was determined to apply more chromatographic processes to isolate and purify compounds. Second fraction (3072 mg) was subjected to column loaded with silica gel as column packing material and petroleum ether:EtOAc as mobile phase at ratios of 4:1, 3:1, 2:1, and 1:1, each 300 mL, respectively, yielding Butyrolactone I and Butyrolactone III. Portions of 10 mL eluates were checked with TLC and merged to obtain compounds.
Butyrolactone I was obtained as an amorphous solid with orange color. Ultraviolet (UV) spectra of compound demonstrated 2 absorption maxima (λmax) at 307 and 210 nm. From the information obtained from Mass Spectrometry (MS), the molecular formula was decided to be C24H24O7. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) data of compound were compared with the fungal metabolites recorded in the literature; it was revealed that there was an agreement with butyrolactone I [85].
Butyrolactone III was obtained as a yellow amorphous solid with λmax in UV spectra at 308 and 225 nm. The MS of compound presented 2 pseudo molecular ion peaks at m/z 463.12586 [M + Na]+ (calcd for C24H24O8Na, 463.13091) and at m/z 439.11538 [M-H]- (calcd for C24H23O8, 423.12212) remarking the compound to be C24H24O8. Checking the NMR spectra of compound with known compounds, compound was defined as butyrolactone III [86,87].

2.2. Instrumentation

2.2.1. General Experimental Procedures

The fungi isolation was carried out in a laminar flow cabin (Holten, USA). Buchi R-300 (Switzerland) rotary evaporator systems were used for evaporating solvents and obtaining dry crude fungi extract.
Chromatographic separation procedures were performed according to the previous methodology [82]. Last purification of isolated compounds was completed by Agilent 1100 Series HPLC system and structures of compounds elucidated with help of a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer (Massachusetts, USA) were used for 1D (1H and 13C NMR) and 2D NMR spectra (chemical shifts in ppm) and Agilent 6230B Time of Flight (TOF) LC/MS (Santa Clara, CA, USA) data.

2.2.2. Synthesis of Hybrid Nanoflowers and Characterization

A total of 1 mL A. terreus extract and its purified components (1 mg/mL) were added separately to 50 mL phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution (50 mM, pH 7) and 20 mL CuSO4 solution (120 mM). The combination was then incubated for 3 days at 25 degrees Celsius. At the bottom of the flash, there appeared a blue precipitate. Finally, the blue color precipitate was centrifuged (12,000 rpm for 20 min) to remove the solution’s supernatant and rinsed 3 times with deionized water for further analysis. The morphology of the synthesized hybrid nanoflowers was examined using SEM, EDX, XRD, and FT-IR. A scanning electron microscope (SEM) is a type of electron microscope that produces images by scanning the sample surface with a concentrated stream of electrons. Electrons interact with atoms in the sample to provide a variety of signals, including information about the topography and composition of the sample surface. These signals are captured by the requisite detectors, which are subsequently transferred to the computer screen, where a picture is generated. The EDX system performs a point, line, area scan, and X-ray mapping of a given area, and elemental analyses can be conducted in these regions, both qualitatively and quantitatively. The X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) approach is based on the idea that each crystal phase refracts X-rays in a distinct manner depending on its atomic arrangement. These diffraction profiles for each crystal phase serve as a fingerprint for that crystal. FTIR stands for Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy and is used to identify organic, polymeric, and, in certain cases, inorganic materials. The FTIR analysis technique uses infrared light to scan test samples and determine chemical properties. The chemical fingerprint of the sample is represented by the resulting signal at the detector, which appears as a spectrum ranging from 4000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1. Each molecule or chemical structure has a unique spectral fingerprint.
In the rest of this text, Aspergillus-Nanoflowers, Butyrolactone I-Nanoflowers, and Butyrolactone III-Nanoflowers were abbreviated as (A-NFs), (B(I)-NFs), and (B(III)-NFs), respectively.

2.3. Antimicrobial Activity

2.3.1. Bacterial Strains and Growth Conditions

The standard strains were obtained from the ATCC, VA, USA: Aeromonas hydrophila (ATCC 7966), Aeromonas sobria (ATCC 43979), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), Salmonella enterica (ATCC 13076), and Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923). The antibacterial activity of A. terreus extracts and its isolated major components was detected against the selected bacteria. Pure cultures of bacteria were sub-cultured on Mueller Hinton Agar (MHA) at 37 °C for 24 h, and each bacterium was then suspended according to 0.5 McFarland [16]. All the antibacterial susceptibility assays were performed in triplicate.

2.3.2. Disk Diffusion Method

Disk diffusion tests were carried out according to the method of Bauer et al. (1966) [88]. Each bacterial suspension, previously diluted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standards, was evenly spread on a solid MHA in a Petri dish using sterile cotton swab. Sterile paper discs with a diameter of 6 mm were impregnated with 20 µL of extract, and these discs were placed on the surface of the agar plate. Empty disks were used as a negative control. The plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24 h, and then the diameter of inhibition zone was measured using a ruler.

2.3.3. Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC)

The MIC of extracts was determined using broth microdilution method. Different concentrations (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, and 1024 μg/mL) of extracts were diluted with 100 μL of Mueller–Hinton broth by 2-fold serial dilution. Then, 10 µL of the tested bacteria previously diluted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard was added into each microtiter plate. Microtiter plates inoculated bacterial cultures were then incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. Therefore, negative (only medium) and positive (medium and bacterial inoculums) controls were performed [89].

3. Results

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Organic–Inorganic Hybrid Nanoflowers

To make the flower-like structures in our study, we first used the A. terreus extract and its isolated main components as an organic component. The mechanism for creating organic–inorganic hybrid nanoflowers has previously been disclosed [38,40,41,44,45,90].
The nanoflowers (NFs) were formed in three stages: nucleation, growth, and conclusion of formation. (1) Primary copper phosphate nanocomplexes were formed from Cu2+ and phosphate ions in the nucleation step, and they primarily bound to amide groups and/or carboxyl and diol groups of organic components to form seeds; (2) primary nanocrystals continued to react with organic molecules in the growth step, and petal-like structures appeared; and (3) NFs were completely formed by sticking petals in the final step [73,81,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97].
When the amide and diol groups of molecules connect with the copper phosphate complex, A-NFs-Cu2+, B(I)-NFs-Cu2+, and B(III)-NFs-Cu2+ are generated. To validate our design, Cu2+ ions and fungal extract were mixed in the PBS solution, and blue precipitates were generated after 3 days of incubation (Figure 1).
According to research by Mutti et al. and Łyskowski et al., the (R)-ω-transaminase from Aspergillus terreus (AT-ωTA) has been demonstrated to preferentially convert aliphatic substrates (chain length up to at least six carbons) with a high yield and high enantioselectivity [98,99].
The A-NFs, B(I)-NFs, and B(III)-NFs had spherical morphologies with narrow size distributions between 11–16 µm, as observed in the SEM images for A-NFs (~11–16 µm), B(I)-NFs (~12–15 µm), and B(III)-NFs (~13–14 µm) in Figure 2. The structure of the hybrid nanoflowers (hNFs) was verified using EDX, XRD, and FTIR. To identify functional groups, FTIR was performed to investigate the chemical structures of free extract and the Cu2+ hNFs extract. The A. terreus extract, Butyrolactone I, Butyrolactone III, and A-NFs, B(I)-NFs, B(III)-NFs -Cu2+ powder were dried at 60 °C prior to FTIR sample preparation. Simply put, each powder was mixed separately with IR grade K Br before being crushed into tablets. The distinctive peaks of the free extract of A. terreus, Butyrolactone I, and Butyrolactone III in Figure 3, and A-NFs, B(I)-NFs, B(III)-NFs -Cu2+ in Figure 4 were studied on the FTIR spectra. At ~985 cm−1, the O-P-O (the (oxygen-phospate-oxygen) bond between the phosphate atom and oxygen atoms in PO4) groups showed lesser bending vibration. However, at ~987 cm−1, the same vibration manifested in a very strong form. The vibration bands of the NH2 groups of the A. terreus, Butyrolactone I, and Butyrolactone III extracts, and A-NFs, B(I)-NFs, B(III)-NFs-Cu2+ hNFs appeared at ~1646 cm−1 and ~1729 cm−1, ~1732 cm−1, 1623 cm−1, 1622 cm−1, and 1622 cm−1, respectively. Finally, the CH3 and CH2 groups of the A. terreus extract, Butyrolactone I, Butyrolactone III, and A-NFs, B(I)-NFs, B(III)-NFs -Cu2+ were assigned to its stretching bands at 2800–3429 cm−1. The crystalline structures of the nanoflowers and Cu3(PO4)H2O were revealed by the XRD patterns in Figure 5. The findings showed that all of the diffraction peaks in Figure 5 well matched the JCPDS card (00–022–0548) in terms of their locations and relative intensities, demonstrating that the hybrid nanoflowers had high crystallinity and were well crystallized. These results demonstrated that Cu NFs were successfully produced by reacting several Aspergillus terreus extracts with their recovered primary components and Cu ions in PBS buffer. The EDX spectrum and mapping of Aspergillus terreus extract, Butyrolactone I, Butyrolactone III, and organic–inorganic NFs showed the presence of Cu and other components in the structure of the hNFs. The weight % of Cu in the hNFs was found to be 20.7%, 20.2%, and 8.9% using Aspergillus terreus extract, Butyrolactone I, and Butyrolactone III, respectively. Additionally, EDX mapping was used to confirm the distribution of the four essential elements in the hNFs, which are C (blue), O (turquoise), P (red), N (green), and Cu (yellow) (Figure 6).

3.2. Analysis of Antimicrobial Activity

The A-NFs, B(I)-NFs, and B(III)-NFs had greater antibacterial activity against all tested pathogen bacteria compared to their extract groups, and the data of all nanoflower groups were statistically similar (p < 0.05). Butyrolactone III only had an inhibition zone on A. hydrophila, while Butyrolactone I had an inhibition zone on A. hydrophila and E. coli. However, A. terreus did not show antibacterial activity against any bacteria tested, and no inhibition zone was seen (Figure 7). According to the results, A. hydrophila and S. aureus were more sensitive to the extracts than other bacteria.
The MICs of extracts varied against different tested strains: A-NFs and B(III)-NFs against A. hydrophila, A-NFs against A. sobria, B(III)-NFs against E. coli, and B(I)-NFs and A-NFs against S. enterica. All nanoflower groups against S. aureus were determined to have the most effective antibacterial effect according to the MIC analysis (Table 1). All extracts with a nanoflower showed antibacterial activity against all bacteria tested. Similar to the results of the disc diffusion method: nanoflower groups had more antibacterial activity compared to other extracts. However, some of the non-nanoflower extracts did not show any antibacterial effect against all bacteria tested, and all bacteria grew on all microtiter plates of these extracts. According to MIC results, A. hydrophila was more sensitive to the extracts than other pathogen bacteria tested. Based on the antimicrobial results obtained in this present study, it was determined that nanoflower treatment provided significant antimicrobial properties to the extracts of A. terreus and Butyrolactone.
Over the last few decades, many studies have been carried out on the investigation of antimicrobial activities as well as antioxidant properties of various plants and their compounds. In addition, the interest of researchers has increased rapidly because they have alternative potentials in terms of being both non-toxic and cheaper compared to synthetic materials. Li et al. (2012) reported that the AgNPs produced by A. terreus exhibited antibacterial activity in S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli with 16 mm, 12 mm, and 13 mm inhibition zone, respectively [100]. Bunbamrung et al. (2020) reported 7 of 31 compounds isolated from marine-derived A. terreus exhibited antibacterial activity against B. cereus with MIC values in the range of 12.5–50.0 mg/mL [101]. Jain and Pundir (2010) investigated the effect of different carbon and nitrogen sources on the antimicrobial metabolite of A. terreus, and they reported that dextrose as a carbon source (22 to 26 mm) and sodium nitrate (20 to 28 mm) as nitrogen source may be used for maximum production of the antimicrobial metabolite from A. terreus according to agar well-diffusion assay [102]. In this present study, nanoflower compounds from A. terreus against the bacteria tested reached a higher inhibition zone (25.06 to 38.22 mm) than those reported by Jain and Pundir (2010) [102]. On the other hand, the results of Jain and Pundir (2010) were similar to our data in that the antimicrobial metabolite of A. terreus against S. aureus (max. 26 mm) was higher than E. coli (max. 24 mm). San-Martin et al. (2011) investigated the antibacterial activity of Butyrolactone I and Butyrolactone VI isolated from Aspergillus sp. against Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae, Xanthomonas arboricola pv juglandis 833, Erwinia carotovora, Agrobacterium tumefaciens A348, and Clavibacter michiganensis 807 [103]. They reported that these compounds showed antibacterial activity only against C. michiganensis. In another study, Cazar et al. (2005) reported that Butyrolactone I isolated from soil fungus A. terreus had stronger inhibitory effect against Erwinia carotovora, and it had antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis and Enterobacter dissolvens. However, they did not determine any antibacterial activity of Butyrolactone III against all bacteria tested [14]. Similarly, we determined that Butyrolactone I had higher inhibitory activity than Butyrolactone III. Orfali et al. (2021) reported that the antibacterial activity of Butyrolactone derivatives isolated from the marine-derived genus Aspergillus has the highest rate of 25% compared to the distribution of other metabolites [7]. These results indicated that nanoflowers of antibacterial compounds produced from the marine fungi A. terreus might be used for medicines in the future. Many methods are used to determine the antimicrobial activities of extracts. However, as these methods are not all based on the same principles, the results determined are affected not only by the method chosen but also by the extraction method used and the microorganism species or solubility degree of the test compound [104]. Accordingly, the differences obtained from both previous studies and the present study data can be attributed to these factors.

4. Conclusions

Finally, isolated secondary metabolites and the extract from Aspergillus terreus-assisted self-assembly with copper ions were employed to create simple and successful 3D nanostructures. The resulting hybrid nanoflowers have a flower-like hierarchical structure, a huge surface area, and increased antibacterial action. Furthermore, no morphological deformation was seen under SEM, showing that the nanoflowers are mechanically stable.
Marine-derived Aspergillus terreus produces a variety of structurally important secondary metabolites, the majority of which have unique biological features that can be used in medicine. In addition, microbial sources are increasingly being used to produce nanoparticles for cancer therapy. A-NFs, B(I)-NFs, and B(III)-NFs have prospective benefits in human health as a therapeutic agent to overcome rising antibiotic resistance against harmful microbes due to their ability to overcome drug resistance.

Author Contributions

B.K. (Belma Konuklugil) and I.O. conceptualized and designed the study. I.S.U. and B.K. (Baris Karsli) conducted experiments. B.K. (Belma Konuklugil) and A.D. analyzed data. A.D. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The Turkish Scientific and Technological Research Council (TUBITAK) funded this research (grant number 114S916). The funder was not involved in the study design, data collection and analysis, publication decision, or manuscript writing.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

Bülent Gözcelioğlu, who collected marine organisms for the study, is acknowledged by the authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Khalifa, S.A.M.; Elias, N.; Farag, M.A.; Chen, L.; Saeed, A.; Hegazy, M.F.; Moustafa, M.S.; Abd El-Wahed, A.; Al-Mousawi, S.M.; Musharraf, S.G.; et al. Marine natural products: A source of novel anticancer drugs. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Wang, C.; Tang, S.; Cao, S. Antimicrobial compounds from marine fungi. Phytochem. Rev. 2021, 20, 85–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Kamat, S.; Kumar, S.; Philip, S.; Kumari, M. Secondary Metabolites from Marine Fungi: Current Status and Application. In Microbial Biomolecules; Kumar, A., Bilal, M., Ferreira, L.F.R., Kumari, M., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 181–209. [Google Scholar]
  4. Javed, F.; Qadir, M.I.; Janbaz, K.H.; Ali, M. Novel drugs from marine microorganisms. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2011, 37, 245–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Blunt, J.W.; Copp, B.R.; Hu, W.-P.; Munro, M.H.G.; Northcote, P.T.; Prinsep, M.R. Marine natural products. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2009, 26, 170–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bugni, T.S.; Ireland, C.M. Marine-derived fungi: A chemically and biologically diverse group of microorganisms. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2004, 21, 143–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Orfali, R.; Aboseada, M.A.; Abdel-Wahab, N.M.; Hassan, H.M.; Perveen, S.; Ameen, F.; Alturki, E.; Abdelmohsen, U.R. Recent updates on the bioactive compounds of the marine-derived genus Aspergillus. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 17116–17150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Luo, X.-W.; Lin, Y.; Lu, Y.-J.; Zhou, X.F.; Liu, Y.H. Peptides and polyketides isolated from the marine sponge-derived fungus Aspergillus terreus SCSIO 41008. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2019, 17, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chen, M.; Wang, K.-L.; Liu, M.; She, Z.-G.; Wang, C.-Y. Bioactive Steroid Derivatives and Butyrolactone Derivatives from a Gorgonian-Derived Aspergillus sp. Fungus. Chem. Biodivers. 2015, 12, 1398–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Sun, Y.; Liu, J.; Li, L.; Gong, C.; Wang, S.; Yang, F.; Hua, H.; Lin, H. New butenolide derivatives from the marine sponge-derived fungus Aspergillus terreus. Bioorganic Med. Chem. Lett. 2018, 28, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zeng, Q.; Zhong, W.-M.; Chen, Y.-C.; Xiang, Y.; Chen, X.-Y.; Tian, X.-P.; Zhang, W.-M.; Zhang, S.; Wang, F.-Z. A new butenolide derivative from the deep-sea fungus Aspergillus terreus SCSIO FZQ028. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 34, 1984–1991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Malik, P.; Shankar, R.; Malik, V.; Sharma, N.K.; Mukherjee, T.K. Green Chemistry Based Benign Routes for Nanoparticle Synthesis. J. Nanoparticles 2014, 2014, 302429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Patra, D.; El Kurdi, R. Curcumin as a novel reducing and stabilizing agent for the green synthesis of metallic nanoparticles. Green Chem. Lett. Rev. 2021, 14, 474–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Cazar, M.-E.; Schmeda-Hirschmann, G.; Astudillo, L. Antimicrobial Butyrolactone I Derivatives from the Ecuadorian Soil Fungus Aspergillus terreus Thorn. var terreus. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 21, 1067–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Rani, R.; Sharma, D.; Chaturvedi, M.; Yadav, J.P. Green Synthesis, Characterization and Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles of Endophytic Fungi Aspergillus terreus. J. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 1000457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Karslı, B. Antibacterial and antioxidant activity of pulp, peel and leaves of Feijoa sellowiana: Effect of extraction techniques, solvents and concentration. Food Health 2021, 7, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Oladipo, A.O.; Nkambule, T.T.I.; Mamba, B.B.; Msagati, T.A.M. Therapeutic nanodendrites: Current applications and prospects. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 5152–5165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Oladipo, A.O.; Unuofin, J.O.; Iku, S.I.; Nkambule, T.T.; Mamba, B.B.; Msagati, T.A. Bimetallic Au@Pd nanodendrite system incorporating multimodal intracellular imaging for improved doxorubicin antitumor efficiency. Int. J. Pharm. 2021, 602, 120661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Oladipo, A.O.; Unuofin, J.O.; Iku, S.I.; Nkambule, T.T.; Mamba, B.B.; Msagati, T.A. Nuclear targeted multimodal 3D-bimetallic Au@Pd nanodendrites promote doxorubicin efficiency in breast cancer therapy. Arab. J. Chem. 2021, 14, 103344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Leena, M.M.; Anukiruthika, T.; Moses, J.; Anandharamakrishnan, C. Co-delivery of curcumin and resveratrol through electrosprayed core-shell nanoparticles in 3D printed hydrogel. Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 124, 107200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Nguyen, T.T.; Van Dao, D.; Ha, N.T.T.; Van Tran, T.; Kim, D.-S.; Yoon, J.-W.; Lee, I.-H.; Yu, Y.-T. Superhigh sensing response and selectivity for hydrogen gas using PdPt@ZnO core-shell nanoparticles: Unique effect of alloyed ingredient from experimental and theoretical investigations. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 354, 131083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pajor-Świerzy, A.; Szczepanowicz, K.; Kamyshny, A.; Magdassi, S. Metallic core-shell nanoparticles for conductive coatings and printing. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 299, 102578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Kim, K.; Chae, S.; Choi, P.G.; Itoh, T.; Saito, N.; Masuda, Y. Facile synthesis of ZnO nanobullets by solution plasma without chemical additives. RSC Adv. 2021, 11, 26785–26790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Thangavelu, R.M.; Gunasekaran, D.; Jesse, M.I.; SU, M.R.; Sundarajan, D.; Krishnan, K. Nanobiotechnology approach using plant rooting hormone synthesized silver nanoparticle as “nanobullets” for the dynamic applications in horticulture—An in vitro and ex vitro study. Arab. J. Chem. 2018, 11, 48–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wang, Z.; Zhang, F.; Shao, D.; Chang, Z.; Wang, L.; Hu, H.; Zheng, X.; Li, X.; Chen, F.; Tu, Z.; et al. Janus Nanobullets Combine Photodynamic Therapy and Magnetic Hyperthermia to Potentiate Synergetic Anti-Metastatic Immunotherapy. Adv. Sci. 2019, 6, 1901690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Hoang, A.T.; Nižetić, S.; Cheng, C.K.; Luque, R.; Thomas, S.; Banh, T.L.; Pham, V.V.; Nguyen, X.P. Heavy metal removal by biomass-derived carbon nanotubes as a greener environmental remediation: A comprehensive review. Chemosphere 2022, 287, 131959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ibusuki, R.; Morishita, T.; Furuta, A.; Nakayama, S.; Yoshio, M.; Kojima, H.; Oiwa, K.; Furuta, K. Programmable molecular transport achieved by engineering protein motors to move on DNA nanotubes. Science 2022, 375, 1159–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Saha, T.; Dash, C.; Jayabalan, R.; Khiste, S.; Kulkarni, A.; Kurmi, K.; Mondal, J.; Majumder, P.K.; Bardia, A.; Jang, H.L.; et al. Intercellular nanotubes mediate mitochondrial trafficking between cancer and immune cells. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2022, 17, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sawant, S.V.; Patwardhan, A.W.; Joshi, J.B.; Dasgupta, K. Boron doped carbon nanotubes: Synthesis, characterization and emerging applications—A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 427, 131616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Arjmand, T.; Legallais, M.; Nguyen, T.T.T.; Serre, P.; Vallejo-Perez, M.; Morisot, F.; Salem, B.; Ternon, C. Functional Devices from Bottom-Up Silicon Nanowires: A Review. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Clarke, T.A. Plugging into bacterial nanowires: A comparison of model electrogenic organisms. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2022, 66, 56–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lee, H.Y.; Kim, S. Nanowires for 2D material-based photonic and optoelectronic devices. Nanophotonics. 2022, 11, 2571–2582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Z.; Pan, X.; Shen, Y.; Chen, R.; Li, T.; Xu, L.; Mai, L. New Insights into Phase-Mechanism Relationship of Mg x MnO 2 Nanowires in Aqueous Zinc-Ion Batteries. Small 2022, 18, 2107743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chong, Y.; Ning, J.; Min, S.; Ye, J.; Ge, C. Emerging nanozymes for potentiating radiotherapy and radiation protection. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2022, 33, 3315–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Feng, N.; Liu, Y.; Dai, X.; Wang, Y.; Guo, Q.; Li, Q. Advanced applications of cerium oxide based nanozymes in cancer. RSC Adv. 2022, 12, 1486–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Huang, Y.; Mu, X.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.; Xie, J.; Ying, R.; Su, E. The recent development of nanozymes for food quality and safety detection. J. Mater. Chem. B 2022, 10, 1359–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ren, X.; Chen, D.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, X.; Huo, M. Nanozymes-recent development and biomedical applications. J. Nanobiotechnology 2022, 20, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wang, Q.; Jiang, J.; Gao, L. Catalytic antimicrobial therapy using nanozymes. WIREs Nanomed. Nanobiotech. 2022, 14, e.1769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zandieh, M.; Liu, J. Surface Science of Nanozymes and Defining a Nanozyme Unit. Langmuir 2022, 38, 3617–3622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Da Costa, F.P.; Cipolatti, E.P.; Junior, A.F.; Henriques, R.O. Nanoflowers: A New Approach of Enzyme Immobilization. Chem. Rec. 2022, 22, e202100293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Demirbas, A. Comparison Study of Synthesized Red (or Blood) Orange Peels and Juice Extract-Nanoflowers and Their Antimicrobial Properties on Fish Pathogen (Yersinia ruckeri). Indian J. Microbiol. 2021, 61, 324–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Li, Z.; Deng, S.; Yu, H.; Yin, Z.; Qi, S.; Yang, L.; Lv, J.; Sun, Z.; Zhang, M. Fe–Co–Ni trimetallic organic framework chrysanthemum-like nanoflowers: Efficient and durable oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 2022, 10, 4230–4241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ouyang, Q.; Liu, K.; Zhu, Q.; Deng, H.; Le, Y.; Ouyang, W.; Yan, X.; Zhou, W.; Tong, J. Brain-Penetration and Neuron-Targeting DNA Nanoflowers Co-Delivering miR-124 and Rutin for Synergistic Therapy of Alzheimer’s Disease. Small 2022, 18, 2107534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Yilmaz, S.G.; Demirbas, A.; Karaagac, Z.; Dadi, S.; Celik, C.; Yusufbeyoglu, S.; Ildiz, N.; Mandal, A.K.; Cimen, B.; Ocsoy, I. Synthesis of taurine-Cu3(PO4)2 hybrid nanoflower and their peroxidase-mimic and antimicrobial properties. J. Biotechnol. 2022, 343, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zhi, L.; Tu, J.; Li, J.; Li, M.; Liu, J. 3D holey hierarchical nanoflowers assembled by cobalt phosphide embedded N-doped carbon nanosheets as bifunctional electrocatalyst for highly efficient overall water splitting. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022, 616, 379–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Du, J.; Liu, Z.; Li, Z.; Han, B.; Sun, Z.; Huang, Y. Carbon nanoflowers synthesized by a reduction–pyrolysis–catalysis route. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 456–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ma, X.; Yuan, B. Fabrication of carbon nanoflowers by plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2009, 255, 7846–7850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Thongtem, S.; Singjai, P.; Thongtem, T.; Preyachoti, S. Growth of carbon nanoflowers on glass slides using sparked iron as a catalyst. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. 2006, 423, 209–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bian, J.; Shu, S.; Li, J.; Huang, C.; Li, Y.Y.; Zhang, R.-Q. Reproducible and recyclable SERS substrates: Flower-like Ag structures with concave surfaces formed by electrodeposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 333, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Cha, S.I.; Mo, C.B.; Kim, K.T.; Hong, S.H. Ferromagnetic Cobalt Nanodots, Nanorices, Nanowires and Nanoflowers by Polyol Process. J. Mater. Res. 2005, 20, 2148–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Ekman, J.M.; Kenis, P.J.A.; Lu, Y. DNA-Mediated Control of Metal Nanoparticle Shape: One-Pot Synthesis and Cellular Uptake of Highly Stable and Functional Gold Nanoflowers. Nano Lett. 2010, 10, 1886–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bin, D.; Yang, B.; Zhang, K.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.; Zhong, J.; Feng, Y.; Guo, J.; Du, Y. Design of PdAg Hollow Nanoflowers through Galvanic Replacement and Their Application for Ethanol Electrooxidation. Chem. A Eur. J. 2016, 22, 16642–16647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Liu, L.J.; Guan, J.G.; Shi, W.D.; Sun, Z.G.; Zhao, J.S. Facile Synthesis and Growth Mechanism of Flowerlike Ni−Fe Alloy Nanostructures. J. Phys. Chem. C Nanomater. Interfaces 2010, 114, 13565–13570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Heli, H.; Rahi, A. Synthesis and Applications of Nanoflowers. Recent Pat. Nanotechnol. 2016, 10, 86–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Kharisov, B.I. A Review for Synthesis of Nanoflowers. Recent Pat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 2, 190–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kim, S.-I.; Lee, J.-S.; Ahn, H.-J.; Song, H.-K.; Jang, J.-H. Facile Route to an Efficient NiO Supercapacitor with a Three-Dimensional Nanonetwork Morphology. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1596–1603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bai, Z.; Yan, X.; Li, Y.; Kang, Z.; Cao, S.; Zhang, Y. 3D-Branched ZnO/CdS Nanowire Arrays for Solar Water Splitting and the Service Safety Research. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1501459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hu, Z.; Wang, L.; Zhang, K.; Wang, J.; Cheng, F.; Tao, Z.; Chen, J. MoS2Nanoflowers with Expanded Interlayers as High-Performance Anodes for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014, 53, 12794–12798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Leung, K.C.-F.; Xuan, S.; Zhu, X.; Wang, D.; Chak, C.-P.; Lee, S.-F.; Ho, W.K.-W.; Chung, B.C.-T. Gold and iron oxide hybrid nanocomposite materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 1911–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Ma, C.-B.; Qi, X.; Chen, B.; Bao, S.; Yin, Z.; Wu, X.-J.; Luo, Z.; Wei, J.; Zhang, H.-L.; Zhang, H. MoS2 nanoflower-decorated reduced graphene oxide paper for high-performance hydrogen evolution reaction. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 5624–5629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Mohanty, A.; Garg, N.; Jin, R. A Universal Approach to the Synthesis of Noble Metal Nanodendrites and Their Catalytic Properties. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2010, 49, 4962–4966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Arya, S.K.; Saha, S.; Ramirez-Vick, J.E.; Gupta, V.; Bhansali, S.; Singh, S.P. Recent advances in ZnO nanostructures and thin films for biosensor applications: Review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 737, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. He, S.; Hu, C.; Hou, H.; Chen, W. Ultrathin MnO2 nanosheets supported on cellulose based carbon papers for high-power supercapacitors. J. Power Sources 2014, 246, 754–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Hu, L.; Ren, Y.; Yang, H.; Xu, Q. Fabrication of 3D Hierarchical MoS2/Polyaniline and MoS2/C Architectures for Lithium-Ion Battery Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 14644–14652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Huang, Y.; Ran, X.; Lin, Y.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Self-assembly of an organic–inorganic hybrid nanoflower as an efficient biomimetic catalyst for self-activated tandem reactions. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 4386–4389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Liu, Y.; Jiao, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Qu, F.; Umar, A.; Wu, X. Hierarchical SnO2 Nanostructures Made of Intermingled Ultrathin Nanosheets for Environmental Remediation, Smart Gas Sensor, and Supercapacitor Applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 2174–2184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wang, D.; Pan, Z.; Wu, Z.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Z. Hydrothermal synthesis of MoS2 nanoflowers as highly efficient hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts. J. Power Sources 2014, 264, 229–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, W.; Gao, Z.; Wang, J.; Ma, J.; Zhang, M.; Liu, L. Solvothermal One-Step Synthesis of Ni–Al Layered Double Hydroxide/Carbon Nanotube/Reduced Graphene Oxide Sheet Ternary Nanocomposite with Ultrahigh Capacitance for Supercapacitors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 5443–5454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zeng, M.; Li, Y.; Liu, F.; Yang, Y.; Mao, M.; Zhao, X. Cu doped OL-1 nanoflower: A UV–vis-infrared light-driven catalyst for gas-phase environmental purification with very high efficiency. Appl. Catal. B 2017, 200, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Xiao, N.; Venton, B.J. Rapid, Sensitive Detection of Neurotransmitters at Microelectrodes Modified with Self-assembled SWCNT Forests. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 7816–7822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Yao, H.-B.; Fang, H.-Y.; Wang, X.-H.; Yu, S.-H. Hierarchical assembly of micro-/nano-building blocks: Bio-inspired rigid structural functional materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 3764–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Zan, G.; Wu, Q. Biomimetic and Bioinspired Synthesis of Nanomaterials/Nanostructures. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 2099–2147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Altinkaynak, C.; Tavlasoglu, S.; Ÿzdemir, N.; Ocsoy, I. A new generation approach in enzyme immobilization: Organic-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers with enhanced catalytic activity and stability. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2016, 93–94, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Lin, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, L.; Yin, Y.; Zheng, J.; Yang, H.; Chen, G. Facile synthesis of enzyme—Inorganic hybrid nanoflowers and their application as an immobilized trypsin reactor for highly efficient protein digestion. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 13888–13891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Lin, Z.; Xiao, Y.; Yin, Y.; Hu, W.; Liu, W.; Yang, H. Facile Synthesis of Enzyme-Inorganic Hybrid Nanoflowers and Its Application as a Colorimetric Platform for Visual Detection of Hydrogen Peroxide and Phenol. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 10775–10782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Nadar, S.S.; Gawas, S.D.; Rathod, V.K. Self-assembled organic-inorganic hybrid glucoamylase nanoflowers with enhanced activity and stability. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 92, 660–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Sun, J.; Ge, J.; Liu, W.; Lan, M.; Zhang, H.; Wang, P.; Wang, Y.; Niu, Z. Multi-enzyme co-embedded organic–inorganic hybrid nanoflowers: Synthesis and application as a colorimetric sensor. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 255–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Yin, Y.; Xiao, Y.; Lin, G.; Xiao, Q.; Lin, Z.; Cai, Z. An enzyme–inorganic hybrid nanoflower based immobilized enzyme reactor with enhanced enzymatic activity. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 2295–2300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kim, K.H.; Jeong, J.-M.; Lee, S.J.; Choi, B.G.; Lee, K.G. Protein-directed assembly of cobalt phosphate hybrid nanoflowers. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 484, 44–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Wu, Z.-F.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, Y.-L.; He, C.-Y.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Huo, Q.-S.; Wang, L.; Li, Z.-Q. Amino acids-incorporated nanoflowers with an intrinsic peroxidase-like activity. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 22412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Ge, J.; Lei, J.; Zare, R.N. Protein–inorganic hybrid nanoflowers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2012, 7, 428–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Wang, L.-B.; Wang, Y.-C.; He, R.; Zhuang, A.; Wang, X.; Zeng, J.; Hou, J.G. A New Nanobiocatalytic System Based on Allosteric Effect with Dramatically Enhanced Enzymatic Performance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 1272–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Qiao, Y.; Lin, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhou, J.; Yan, Y.; Huang, J. Metal-Driven Hierarchical Self-Assembled One-Dimensional Nanohelices. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 4500–4504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Qiao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Z.; Lin, Y.; Huang, J. Self-templating of metal-driven supramolecular self-assembly: A general ap-proach toward 1D inorganic nanotubes. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 1182–1187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Uras, I.S.; Ebada, S.S.; Korinek, M.; Albohy, A.; Abdulrazik, B.S.; Wang, Y.-H.; Chen, B.-H.; Horng, J.-T.; Lin, W.; Hwang, T.-L.; et al. Anti-Inflammatory, Antiallergic, and COVID-19 Main Protease (Mpro) Inhibitory Activities of Butenolides from a Ma-rine-Derived Fungus Aspergillus terreus. Molecules 2021, 26, 3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Yu, Y.; Fei, X.; Tian, J.; Xu, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y. Self-assembled enzyme–inorganic hybrid nanoflowers and their application to enzyme purification. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2015, 130, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Nitta, K.; Fujita, N.; Yoshimura, T.; Arai, K.; Yamamoto, Y. Metabolic products of Aspergillus terreus. IX. Biosynthesis of butyrolactone derivatives isolated from strains IFO 8835 and 4100. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1983, 31, 1528–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  88. Bauer, A.W.; Kirby, W.M.; Sherris, J.C.; Turck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1966, 45, 493–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ildiz, N.; Baldemir, A.; Altinkaynak, C.; Özdemir, N.; Yilmaz, V.; Ocsoy, I. Self assembled snowball-like hybrid nanostructures comprising Viburnum opulus L. extract and metal ions for antimicrobial and catalytic applications. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2017, 102, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Koca, F.D. Preparation of thymol incorporated organic-inorganic hybrid nanoflowers as a novel fenton agent with in-trinsic catalytic and antimicrobial activities. Inorg. Nano-Met. Chem. 2022, 52, 322–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Altinkaynak, C.; Yilmaz, I.; Koksal, Z.; Özdemir, H.; Ocsoy, I.; Özdemir, N. Preparation of lactoperoxidase incorporated hybrid nanoflower and its excellent activity and stability. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 84, 402–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Ariza-Avidad, M.; Salinas-Castillo, A.; Capitán-Vallvey, L. A 3D µPAD based on a multi-enzyme organic–inorganic hybrid nanoflower reactor. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016, 77, 51–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Huang, K.-J.; Liu, Y.-J.; Liu, Y.-M.; Wang, L.-L. Molybdenum disulfide nanoflower-chitosan-Au nanoparticles composites based electrochemical sensing platform for bisphenol A determination. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014, 276, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Liang, L.; Fei, X.; Li, Y.; Tian, J.; Xu, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y. Hierarchical assembly of enzyme-inorganic composite materials with extremely high enzyme activity. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 96997–97002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Somturk, B.; Hancer, M.; Ocsoy, I.; Özdemir, N. Synthesis of copper ion incorporated horseradish peroxidase-based hybrid nanoflowers for enhanced catalytic activity and stability. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 13845–13852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Thawari, A.G.; Rao, C.P. Peroxidase-like Catalytic Activity of Copper-Mediated Protein–Inorganic Hybrid Nanoflowers and Nanofibers of β-Lactoglobulin and α-Lactalbumin: Synthesis, Spectral Characterization, Microscopic Features, and Catalytic Activity. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 10392–10402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Zhang, Z.; Kong, X.-Y.; Xiao, K.; Xie, G.; Liu, Q.; Tian, Y.; Zhang, H.; Ma, J.; Wen, L.; Jiang, L. A Bioinspired Multifunctional Heterogeneous Membrane with Ultrahigh Ionic Rectification and Highly Efficient Selective Ionic Gating. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 144–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Mutti, F.; Fuchs, C.; Pressnitz, D.; Sattler, J.; Kroutil, W. Stereoselectivity of four (R)-selective transaminases for the asymmetric amination of ketones. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2011, 353, 3227–3233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Łyskowski, A.; Gruber, C.; Steinkellner, G.; Schürmann, M.; Schwab, H.; Gruber, K.; Steiner, K. Crystal Structure of an (R)-Selective ω-Transaminase from Aspergillus terreus. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e87350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  100. Li, G.; He, D.; Qian, Y.; Guan, B.; Gao, S.; Cui, Y.; Yokoyama, K.; Wang, L. Fungus-Mediated Green Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Aspergillus terreus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 466–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Bunbamrung, N.; Intaraudom, C.; Dramae, A.; Komwijit, S.; Laorob, T.; Khamsaeng, S.; Pittayakhajonwut, P. Antimicrobial, antimalarial and anticholinesterase substances from the marine-derived fungus Aspergillus terreus BCC51799. Tetrahedron 2020, 76, 131496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Jain, P.; Pundir, R.K. Effect of different carbon and nitrogen sources on Aspergillus terreus antimicrobial metabolite pro-duction. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res. 2010, 5. [Google Scholar]
  103. San-Martín, A.; Rovirosa, J.; Vaca, I.; Vergara, K.; Acevedo, L.; Viña, D.; Orallo, F.; Chamy, M.C. New butyrolactone from a marine-derived fungus Aspergillus sp. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2011, 56, 625–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Klančnik, A.; Piskernik, S.; Jeršek, B.; Možina, S.S. Evaluation of diffusion and dilution methods to determine the antibacterial activity of plant extracts. J. Microbiol. Methods 2010, 81, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of amide and diol groups of molecules extracted from A. terreus bind with the copper phosphate complex.
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of amide and diol groups of molecules extracted from A. terreus bind with the copper phosphate complex.
Sustainability 15 04638 g001
Figure 2. SEM images of (A) Aspergillus terreus extract (~11–16 µm), (B) Butyrolactone I (~12–15 µm), and (C) Butyrolactone III (~13–14 µm) organic–inorganic NFs.
Figure 2. SEM images of (A) Aspergillus terreus extract (~11–16 µm), (B) Butyrolactone I (~12–15 µm), and (C) Butyrolactone III (~13–14 µm) organic–inorganic NFs.
Sustainability 15 04638 g002
Figure 3. FTIR of Aspergillus terreus extract, Butyrolactone I, and Butyrolactone III.
Figure 3. FTIR of Aspergillus terreus extract, Butyrolactone I, and Butyrolactone III.
Sustainability 15 04638 g003
Figure 4. FTIR of Aspergillus terreus extract, Butyrolactone I, and Butyrolactone III organic–inorganic NFs.
Figure 4. FTIR of Aspergillus terreus extract, Butyrolactone I, and Butyrolactone III organic–inorganic NFs.
Sustainability 15 04638 g004
Figure 5. XRD of (A) Aspergillus terreus extract, (B) Butyrolactone I, and (C) Butyrolactone III organic–inorganic NFs.
Figure 5. XRD of (A) Aspergillus terreus extract, (B) Butyrolactone I, and (C) Butyrolactone III organic–inorganic NFs.
Sustainability 15 04638 g005
Figure 6. Using EDX Mapping to examine and show the components of C, O, P, N, and Cu with various colors of (A) Aspergillus terreus extract, (B) Butyrolactone I, and (C) Butyrolactone III, hNFs.
Figure 6. Using EDX Mapping to examine and show the components of C, O, P, N, and Cu with various colors of (A) Aspergillus terreus extract, (B) Butyrolactone I, and (C) Butyrolactone III, hNFs.
Sustainability 15 04638 g006
Figure 7. Antibacterial activity of the A. terreus and Butyrolactone extracts against tested pathogen bacteria. *: No inhibition zone. NF: Nanoflower.
Figure 7. Antibacterial activity of the A. terreus and Butyrolactone extracts against tested pathogen bacteria. *: No inhibition zone. NF: Nanoflower.
Sustainability 15 04638 g007
Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentration (µg/mL) of the extracts against tested pathogen bacteria.
Table 1. Minimum inhibitory concentration (µg/mL) of the extracts against tested pathogen bacteria.
ExtractsA. hydrophilaA. sobriaE. coliS. entericaS. aureus
B(III)-NFs864326416
B(I)-NFs1664643216
A-NFs832643216
Butyrolactone III1024+++1024
Butyrolactone I5121024102410241024
A. terreus+1024+++
+: Growth in all concentrations. NF: Nanoflower.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Uras, I.S.; Karsli, B.; Konuklugil, B.; Ocsoy, I.; Demirbas, A. Organic–Inorganic Nanocomposites of Aspergillus terreus Extract and Its Compounds with Antimicrobial Properties. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054638

AMA Style

Uras IS, Karsli B, Konuklugil B, Ocsoy I, Demirbas A. Organic–Inorganic Nanocomposites of Aspergillus terreus Extract and Its Compounds with Antimicrobial Properties. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):4638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054638

Chicago/Turabian Style

Uras, Ibrahim Seyda, Baris Karsli, Belma Konuklugil, Ismail Ocsoy, and Ayse Demirbas. 2023. "Organic–Inorganic Nanocomposites of Aspergillus terreus Extract and Its Compounds with Antimicrobial Properties" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 4638. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054638

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop