Next Article in Journal
Low Carbon Management of China’s Hotel Tourism through Carbon Emission Trading
Previous Article in Journal
Beyond “Community-Washing”: Effective and Sustained Community Collaboration in Urban Waterways Management
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 15
Issue 5
10.3390/su15054620
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Teachers’ Commitment to the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Sustainable Teaching Performance

by
Mohammed Alzoraiki
1,2,*,
Abd Rahman Ahmad
2,*,
Ali Ahmed Ateeq
1,
Gehad Mohammed Ahmed Naji
3,
Qais Almaamari
1 and
Baligh Ali Hasan Beshr
1
1
Administrative Science Department, College of Administrative and Financial Science, Gulf University, Sanad 26489, Bahrain
2
Faculty of Technology Management and Business, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM), Parit Raja 86400, Malaysia
3
Department of Management & Humanities, Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS, Seri Iskandar 32610, Malaysia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(5), 4620; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054620
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 28 February 2023 / Accepted: 2 March 2023 / Published: 4 March 2023
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In the field of education, ongoing processes, and optimal schoolwork outcomes require educational leadership, especially in developing countries, due to the lack of sustainable teaching performance and effective leadership. The present study aims to examine the mediating role of teachers’ commitment to transformational leadership and sustainable teaching performance. The sample of the study was selected using a stratified random sampling technique. Out of the 450 copies distributed to the participants, only 374 were retrieved as valid. The hypotheses of the study were tested using PLS–SEM. The findings showed a positive effect of transformational leadership on teachers’ commitment. Moreover, transformational leadership was also found to positively impact teachers’ performance. In contrast, the teachers’ commitment was revealed to positively affect sustainable teaching performance. Finally, the study showed that the teachers’ commitment mediated the relationship between transformational leadership and sustainable teaching performance. This study is unique for being among the few studies that examine the effects of principals’ transformational leadership. It provides educational leaders and policymakers with significant insights by providing a roadmap that aids in understanding the most influential factors on teaching performance sustainability. Consequently, this study holds significant practical relevance for leaders in the field of education and policymakers, as they provide valuable insights into policies and practices that can be implemented to foster sustainability in the school environment.

1. Introduction

Sustainable teaching performance is an important concept in education, one that focuses on the long-term success of teaching. It involves creating and maintaining a positive learning environment for students, as well as providing adequate resources and support for teachers [1,2]. This includes providing teachers with ongoing professional development, access to the latest technology, and the necessary resources to effectively teach students [3,4,5]. Additionally, it involves creating an environment where students are encouraged to ask questions and engage in meaningful dialogue with their teachers. By doing this, teachers can ensure that their students are learning and retaining the material, while also making sure that they are enjoying their learning experience [6,7].
Sustainability in the teaching profession refers to the capacity of teachers to create and implement educational practices that are socially, economically, and environmentally responsible. In both Europe and the USA, there are increasing efforts to promote sustainable teaching as a means of improving the quality of education, reducing environmental impacts, and enhancing the overall wellbeing of students, teachers, and the wider community [8,9]. In Europe, sustainable teaching performance is being integrated into education policies and practices, with a focus on promoting green skills, sustainable lifestyles, and innovative and inclusive teaching practices [10]. In the USA, there are similar efforts to promote sustainable teaching performance, with a focus on creating environmentally sustainable schools and promoting the wellbeing of students and teachers [9,11].
Indeed, the majority of developing nations, including Yemen, have yet to extensively examine the leadership concept to be able to use it as a key success factor in their organizations and institutions. This is mainly due to the lack of resources, knowledge, and experience available in these countries. However, there have been some recent initiatives to introduce leadership training and development in these countries, such as the Yemen Leadership Initiative, which is a partnership between the government of Yemen and international organizations to promote leadership development in the country [12]. This initiative is aimed at increasing the capacity of local leaders to effectively manage and lead their organizations to achieve their goals and objectives [13].
Therefore, developing nations need to catch up on their performance and productivity if they are to compete in a globalized market and rise to the pinnacle of success. In this regard, in the educational sector, leadership has been evidenced to play a key role in performance [14]. Educational institutions are increasingly acknowledging the fact that successful leadership policies and practices have a primary role in increasing the sustainable performance of leaders and teachers in schools, and the overall productivity of institutions [15]. Suffice to say, the success of every institution hinges, one way or another, on the director/leader and the employees, indicating that the institution’s ability to compete lies in efficient leadership. While employees form the core of each organization, its success largely depends on the management leading the staff [16,17].
Research on educational leadership is available in the literature [18]. However, most studies have mainly focused on comparing top leadership styles to transformational and transactional leadership, which suggests a comprehensive leadership model. Leadership studies have mainly focused on comparing the top leadership styles of transformational and transactional leadership, suggesting a full-scale leadership model. In this regard [19], focus on examining the relationship between transformational leadership in schools and the commitment of teachers toward students has been urged, arguing that school principals as leaders, along with their teachers, develop the teaching and learning ambiance and experience.
Teachers’ commitment is an important concept in education and is especially important in developing countries such as Yemen. In Yemen, teachers often face difficult conditions and limited resources, and their commitment to their students and their work can be crucial in creating a successful learning environment. The Yemen Leadership Initiative was established to help promote leadership development in the country, and this includes training and development for teachers to help them understand and practice the principles of effective teaching [20]. For this purpose, the initial teacher training program should be designed to meet the specific needs of the country’s education system. This can include developing curricula that reflect the cultural, social, and linguistic diversity of Yemen. The training program should also take into account the challenges that Yemen faces, such as limited resources, access to technology, and political instability [21]. Therefore, the program should be well-structured and designed to ensure that teachers receive the necessary support and guidance throughout their training. This may include providing opportunities for practical teaching experience, mentoring, and professional development [22].
In addition, the program should incorporate ongoing evaluation and monitoring to ensure that it remains effective and relevant. This can include regular assessments of teacher competencies and the impact of the training program on student learning outcomes. Thus, to ensure the sustainability of the initial teacher training program in Yemen, it is important to develop a long-term plan that takes into account the unique challenges and resources that the country faces. This can include strategies for funding, capacity building and continuing professional development opportunities for teachers [23,24].
As a consequence, the present paper adopted the transformational leadership model to examine educational reform in the public schools in Yemen, as the model has been known to increase the commitment level of employees as well as their performance [25]. The paper primarily aims to examine the relationship between transformational leadership and teachers’ performance, and the commitment of teachers among the public schools of Yemen [20,26]. The paper also aims to contribute to and improve current scientific research on the topic in the Yemeni educational sector.

2. Theoretical Background and Development of Hypotheses

2.1. Teacher’s Performance

Sustainable teaching performance in schools and educational institutions is among the top research fields when it comes to the educational sector [27] as such performance plays a key role in the educational domain. The performance of teachers is closely linked to the teacher’s behavior in the process of teaching, where performance is measured in light of knowledge concerning the teaching material and the ability towards content structure planning development [28]. In sum, teachers have a key role to play in enhancing and ensuring the performance of sustainability education in schools and institutions.
Added to the above, the literature on general performance was examined in a study [29] that revealed that the method of performance evaluation assesses the level of the employees’ work performance when compared against a set of rules, and against knowledge transfer. According to another study [30], performance evaluation refers to the estimation of the working performance of the employee with an attempt to determine the level to which they efficiently do the job. Performance evaluation was described as an official system of estimation and assessment of the individual/team’s performance. Moreover, a study [31] indicated that staff performance assessment determines the staff’s ability to complete work tasks or responsibilities within a specific period while achieving productivity sustainably.
In the context of sustainable teaching, performance is one of the top controversial methods that the official educational system employs [32]. The system uses a dual development and responsibility purpose, prompting concerns from some teachers, while others have acknowledged and accepted its ability to obtain job-related feedback [33]. In this regard, it is challenging to measure the performance sustainable of teachers in Yemen, as a developing nation lacking standardized evaluation metrics. This was brought on by the ineffective management of the Ministry of Education, which resulted in a poor level of teachers’ performance in the face of insufficient guidelines and a lack of motivation, planning, and team development [20].
Previous studies of this caliber have evidenced the teacher’s commitment as a key driver of the teacher’s performance, absenteeism, and turnover [34,35]. Studies revealed that the commitment of teachers is the top efficient strategy to enhance the achievement of the organization. Also, transformational leadership positively affects the employees’ commitment [36]. In other words, the teacher’s high level of commitment is the driver from which duties and responsibilities are fulfilled. The teacher holds the responsibility for duties performed, and his/her commitment is what builds trust and increases the motivation to do what is best [37].
Based on the findings of prior studies, administrators’ leadership behaviors are related to the performance of employees [38]. The majority of the researchers are of the consensus of the presence of the relationship between transformational leadership, employee performance, and job satisfaction. They contended that transformational leadership is the top driver of employee performance [39]. Some other studies of the same caliber indicated a positive relationship between transformational leadership and employee performance [40]. According to the discussion above, this study proposes the following hypotheses for testing:
There is a positive effect of transformational leadership on teacher’s performance in Yemeni public schools,
There is a positive effect of the teachers’ organizational commitment on their performance in Yemeni public schools.

2.2. Transformational Leadership

Transformational leadership is a type of leadership style that focuses on inspiring and motivating people to achieve a desired goal. In teaching, transformational leadership has been known to play a key role in the performance of teachers [41]. Transformational leaders can create a positive learning environment, foster collaboration and communication among students and teachers, and motivate students to reach their full potential. Moreover, transformational leaders can also recognize and reward good performance, and provide constructive feedback to help teachers improve their teaching practices. Transformational leadership is an important concept for teachers to understand and strive to practice to be successful in their profession [42,43], simply because a good leader is capable of smoothly and effectively leading a team. Similar to this fact is the claim that a good teacher is essentially a good leader and thus, school leaders have a positive influence on teachers. The majority of studies in the literature have concentrated on examining the transformational leadership effect on the performance of employees in business organizations [44].
In the context of education, transformational leaders’ behaviors can impact the performance of teachers, and Yemen, in particular, a study [25] revealed the significant effect of transformational leadership on the teachers’ performance in public schools. Idealized influence is also referred to as behavioral charisma. In an organization, the leader is looked upon as a role model that inculcates a shared vision, clear objectives, and a united sense of purpose. It goes to show that an idealized leader is a driving force behind the progress of the organization, leading the followers with his zeal [45,46], and transformational leaders are characterized as such to instill confidence in their followers to achieve a brighter outcome [47,48].
An inspiring leader is capable of influencing his followers and continually encouraging them towards progress through their efforts. Such leaders lay down goals and motivational tasks for the followers and simplify the task-related challenges to them. In this regard, transformational leaders use inspirational motivation to explain their visions to their followers [49,50].
The intellectual stimulation of leaders refers to the stimulation of their followers to boost their innovation and creativity (Bass, 1999) [47] explained that intellectual stimulation leads to problem-solving methods and new ideas, and in combination, they affect the performance of the organization’s innovation. Hence, intellectual stimulation is described as the inclination of the transformational leader to tackle the reflection of the follower concerning problem-solving strategies to encourage them to be more creative and innovative [47].
A leader adopting an individualized consideration aspect is capable of handling, respecting, and viewing the individuality of the employee. Such a leader is attentive to individual employees’ needs, achievements, and growth and assists the latter in reinforcing their strengths through teaching, sharing, and directing [51]. More specifically, individualized consideration is referred to as the procedure and monitoring strategy adopted by the leader for the followers to reach their potential [52]. The leader is viewed as the coach and advisor, paving the way for more opportunities that challenge the development and growth of the followers all the while enhancing their motivation. Extant research has emphasized the significance and application of transformational leadership in an organization, including public education institutions and schools, particularly in Yemen.
The majority of studies in the literature have attempted to test the transformational leadership–organizational commitment relationship among teachers [50,53]. This is supported by the general belief that a relationship exists between the school principal’s behavior and the organizational commitment of teachers. The belief is that the school leader’s leadership skills significantly affect the commitment of the teachers. Additionally, prior studies on the topic showed that practices of transformational leadership significantly influence the teacher’s commitment and satisfaction—with changes that result from such leadership style including democratic and fair changes that enhance individual’s commitment and involvement [54,55]. Hence, on this basis, this paper proposes the testing of the following hypothesis:
“There is a positive effect of transformational leadership on teachers’ organizational commitment in Yemeni public schools”.

2.3. Commitment of Teachers

According to a previous study [56,57], organizational commitment is a construct with multiple dimensions. It is the amalgamation of three core themes, namely affective, continuance, and normative commitment. Organizational commitment is crucial in human resource management, and it is described as the sense of loyalty of the employees to their respective organization and their association with its goals and objectives [58,59,60].
Studies abound concerning the organizational commitment of teachers in the literature [61]. Concerning this, teachers’ commitment has been evidenced to be enhanced if leaders of schools adopt a transformational leadership style [62]. The commitment of teachers requires in-depth examination due to its influence on the performance and outcomes of students, and in turn, the whole school’s performance. In Yemen, because of the lack of studies tackling teachers’ commitment calls for examining the construct and its components (affective commitment, normative commitment, and continuance commitment) [63,64].
This study further examined the mediating role of teachers’ commitment to the relationship between transformational leadership and performance. Therefore, this study views the mediating effect of the organizational commitment of teachers as a significant construct because lack of such commitment could harm the teacher’s perception and performance, as well as the performance of the educational process as a whole. Organizational commitment is invaluable for any organization as it indicates the performance of the organization [65].
A related study found that employees’ performance effectively improved via the mediation of their commitment, as opposed to being in direct relation to it. Similarly, authors of [66] found organizational commitment to have an intervening effect on the significant transformational leadership–employee performance relationship. Hence, on this basis, the paper proposes the testing of the following hypothesis:
“There is a mediating effect of teachers’ organizational commitment on the relationship between transformational leadership and teachers’ performance”.
Regarding conceptual framework, the literature’s findings indicate several of the above-related results from various contexts, indicating a significant relationship between transformational leadership and teacher commitment [67,68]. The reviewed literature also indicated a significant relationship between transformational leadership and employee performance from different environments and aspects, albeit studies were mostly conducted on business entities [64,67].
Moreover, studies dedicated to teacher’s performance, particularly in the context of Yemen, are still lacking based on the reviewed literature, and as yet, no study has been conducted to examine the effect of transformational leadership on a teacher’s performance via mediating role of teachers’ commitment in Yemeni public schools. Thus, this study examines the mediating role of teachers’ commitment on the transformational leadership–performance relationship in this context.

3. Methods

Based on the study framework, the study variables and their relationships were depicted based on the examination of models and review of literature, upon which the hypotheses were formulated. The study framework examines the relationship between the three main constructs of the study, namely transformational leadership, teacher’s commitment, and teacher performance among teachers in Yemeni public schools. Four hypotheses were proposed by the model for testing.
The design of a questionnaire is an important stage in any research project for several reasons, the most important of which are the following: first, it assists in capturing the number of targeted respondents; second, it assists in minimizing and avoiding potential errors in measurement; and third, it assists in capturing the demographic information of respondents [69]. When it comes to constructing a survey, the stages known as “questionnaire formulation and design” are regarded as being the most demanding [70]. Two significant concerns have been brought to light: the presentation and substance. The substance of the questionnaire should correspond to the study’s questions and goals, and it should be backed by the conversation with industry professionals and comprehensive research of the relevant literature. An efficient structure for a questionnaire takes into account the problems at hand in the order of the questions, the choices of responses, and the language of the inquiries [71].
The questionnaire was also evaluated by experts in the field to ensure that the questions were relevant and appropriate for the research topic. Additionally, the questionnaire was tested on a small sample of participants to ensure that it was easy to understand and complete. Finally, the questionnaire was reviewed by a statistician to ensure that it was properly structured and that all questions were valid and reliable.
Question responses might be either closed- or open-ended. The closed-ended structure was selected for this research because it is appropriate for the study and the nature of the questions. This style offers various benefits, including faster response time from respondents and more accessible information coding for subsequent data analysis [71]. A survey questionnaire was used to obtain primary data from Yemeni school teachers. To enhance the response rate, questionnaire administration, and transcription must be efficient and orderly [72]. Hence, self-administration of the questionnaire was used, with answers recorded on a numerical scale.
To raise the degree of respondents’ attention, Sekaran and Bougie [71] provided several delivery methods for a questionnaire, including the attractiveness, accuracy, and professionalism of the questionnaire. To comply with a study’s goals and scope, it is important to avoid long words and complicated terminology in the questionnaire items. The respondents were allotted 30 days to fill out the questionnaire. To increase the response rate, nonrespondents were pursued through visits, reminders, and phone calls [73].The questionnaire was self-administered to all of the sample schools using the previously mentioned information. To resolve any uncertainties and boost response rates, the researcher connected with the coordinator of each school to encourage them to speed up the response. Over one month, information was gathered from every sample unit. The researcher used a quantitative study to ensure that data could be turned into substantial results that are essential to the progress of the research [74].

3.1. Measurements of Variables

This study designed a 62-item questionnaire based on the studies in the literature in the education domain, with the items measured using a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire was divided into parts, with each part playing a role in measuring the constructs. More specifically, Section A contains demographic information questions about gender, age, work experience, education level, and current position of the respondents as shown in Appendix A, Table A1. While Section B contains many parts with the following contents: Part 1 contains 21 items that measure transformational leadership construct, Part 2 contains 17 items that measure organizational commitment constructs, and Part 3 contains 24 items that measure the performance of teachers. Various sources were used to adopt the measures in the literature, and as mentioned, a 5-point Likert scale was employed to gauge the items, ranging from 1, depicting strongly disagree, to 5, depicting strongly agree.

3.2. Data Collection

This study employed the questionnaire survey as the main tool for data collection, following a fundamental set of procedures to obtain data from the respondents within their natural environment. The study distributed a total of 450 questionnaire copies to the teachers working in Yemeni public schools located in different districts. The author hand-delivered the copies and personally collected them from the employees to ensure that they were filled. According to another study [50], the response level is highly enhanced through this strategy. Also, the author can obtain firsthand feedback from those who have completed the questionnaire. From the 450 distributed questionnaire copies, 374 were retrieved and deemed suitable for analysis, indicating a response rate of 83.11%.
To analyze the research model under the recommendation of [75], this study made use of variance-based structural equation modeling and partial least squares, or PLS–SEM. The next subsections detail the study model evaluation, divided into two phases, namely the measurement model and the structural model [76]. PLS–SEM was selected as a statistical approach, as it is capable of generating simultaneous analysis of the measurement and structural model, ensuring accurate estimate values [77,78]. The two phases are discussed next.

3.3. Measurement Model Assessment

The assessment of the measurement model/outer model in the PLS–SEM entails obtaining the composite reliability (CR) value for internal consistency and both indicator reliability and average variance extracted (AVE) for convergent validity [77]. Cronbach’s alpha values and composite reliability (CR) values are the top indicators of internal consistency reliability and have threshold values of over 0.70 according to the rule of thumb established by [77]. In this paper, all of the Cronbach’s alpha values exceeded 0.70, ranging from 0.830 to 0.984. With regards to the CR values of the constructs, they were over the minimum acceptable value of 0.70, ranging from 0.887 to 0.967 as shown in Appendix A, Table A2.
Reliability can also be confirmed by observing the factor loadings. According to Hair et al. (2017) [76], the same indicators are reflected in the construct, and they are indicated by their high loading and based on the fact that the construct factor loadings all exceeded the recommended value of 0.70. Moving on to the AVE values for convergent validity (validity that reflects the positive measure correlation with other measures of a single construct), they obtained an acceptable range from 0.612 to 0.909, well above the recommended 0.50 value (Hair et al., 2017). Thus, convergent validity was confirmed with the AVE values.
Discriminant validity was tested using the Fornell–Larcker criterion, as suggested by authors of [76]. This type of validity is considered to be present when the diagonal elements are higher than those in the rows and columns (refer to Table 1), in which case, discriminant validity is confirmed.

4. Structural Model Assessment

Hypotheses Testing

The testing of the structural model involved the calculation of the β values, t-value, and p-value, using the bootstrapping process and a resample of 2000 [76]. Figure 1 and Table 2 present the results of the process and based on them, a positive and significant effect of transformational leadership was found on the organizational commitment of teachers in Yemeni public schools at the level of significance of 0.001 (β = 0.355, t = 7.354, p < 0.001). The results also show that transformational leadership positively and significantly influences teacher’s performance at the significance level of 0.001 (β = 0.186, t = 2.994, p < 0.001), and organizational commitment positively and significantly mediates the relationship between transformational leadership and teacher’s performance at the level of significance of 0.001 (β = 0.122, t = 4.142, p < 0.001).
With regards to the testing of mediating variables, the PLS–SEM bootstrapping approach was also employed using PLS–SEM, as the software is capable of testing complex multivariate main and indirect effects models (like in this study). According to authors of [79], the PLS–SEM bootstrapping procedure evaluates the statistical significance of the relevant path coefficients, and using path analysis, it considers both effects (direct and indirect) simultaneously, in contrast to other mediating testing techniques [80].
Based on the study model examined, organizational teacher’s commitment was brought forward as having a mediating effect on the relationship between transformational leadership and teacher performance. The related test was carried out to determine if OTC has a mediating role in the TFL (IIN, IM, IS, and IC) and TP (TPM, FPC, PTP, and AE) relationship. Based on the obtained results, OTC significantly mediates the TFL–TP relationship as the confidence interval of the indirect effect of TFL on TP (β =0.168, 95% CI = 0.065 to 0.1179) did not include zero (0). The mediation test results are tabulated in Table 3 and are consistent with the approach adopted by Preacher and Hayes (2008) [80].

5. Discussion

The development of a theoretical model was carried out in this study based on the reviewed literature, generating testable relationships among the study constructs for the government education sector in Yemen. The study constructs are transformational leadership, organizational commitment of teachers, and teachers’ performance. The model confirms the effect of transformational leadership practices on the performance of the teachers and further confirms the mediating role of the teacher’s commitment to the relationship. Table 3 shows that all transformational leadership dimensions significantly influenced affective, continuance, and normative commitment—in other words, transformational leadership has a significant and positive effect on the teachers’ organizational commitment (β = 0.355, t = 7.354, p = 0.000). This result is aligned with those reported by prior studies that empirically evidenced the significant effect of transformational leadership on the commitment of teachers to the organization [81].
Therefore, based on this finding, this study recommends that policymakers focus on the transformational leadership practices adopted in schools. This could be facilitated by introducing training initiatives, programs, and workshops to train the leaders and convince them of the relationship between such practices and teachers’ commitment in Yemeni public schools [82]. According to Meyer and Allen [83], the organizational commitment of teachers cannot be fathomed without first understanding its components, which are affective, normative, and continuance commitment. The statistical analysis results concerning the organizational commitment of teachers and teachers’ performance indicated that the former’s dimensions have a significant relationship with the latter. Specifically, the beta coefficient for affective commitment with a teacher’s performance was 0.849 at a p-value that is less than 0.001, for normative commitment with a teacher’s performance it was 0.925 at a p-value that is less than 0.001, and for continuance commitment with teacher’s performance was 0.909 at a p-value of less than 0.001. These significant statistics results indicate that teachers’ teamwork and lack of conflicts among their coworkers, coupled with improved problem-solving skills, would lead to enhanced performance. This finding supports prior findings reported by various studies [84,85,86].
In addition to the above, the results also supported the significant effect of transformational leadership on the performance of teachers. Composite variable testing (refer to Table 3) shows that all variables indicated that transformational leadership significantly affected the performance of teachers (β = 0.186, t = 2.994, p = 0.001), establishing the positive and significant influence of transformational leadership on the performance of teachers as reported in the prior literature [44]. TFL’s four components were all found to significantly and positively affect teachers’ performance. The direct hypothesis concerning this was significant and positive indicating that transformational leadership practices do affect the performance of teachers.
Moving on to the mediating role of teacher’s commitment to the transformational leadership–teacher’s performance relationship, based on the statistical results displayed in Table 3, the direct effect of transformational leadership on teacher’s performance and the direct effect of transformational leadership and teacher’s commitment. A review of the results in Table 3 (Preacher and Hayes, 2008) [80], shows that the organizational commitment of teachers significantly and positively mediates the transformational leadership practices adopted and the performance of teachers—a result that is consistent with this study’s result.
On the whole, the PLS–SEM results support the mediating role of the teacher’s commitment to the relationship between transformational leadership practices and teacher’s performance, which is hypothesis 4. Transformational leadership is positively related to organizational commitment and teacher performance in the public schools of Yemen, indicating that leaders in such institutions should enhance organizational commitment culture among their staff through idealized influence to build trust, respect, and appreciation; through inspirational motivation by encouraging commitment, team spirit, and communication; through intellectual stimulation by seeking new strategies and teaching approaches; and through individualized consideration through the consideration of the requirements among teachers. In other words, willingness to share among teachers when it comes to their knowledge, skills, experiences, notes, and teaching materials can be brought about through their commitment, which eventually culminates in enhanced sustainable teaching performance.
This study is unique for being among the few studies that examine the effects of principals’ transformational leadership on teachers’ performance. In addition, it is a scarce study to test the mediating effect of OTC on the link between TFL and teachers’ performance in the context of Yemen’s schools. Moreover, this study presented many contributions to the body of research in the domain of organizational commitment and the factors that would lead to better organizational performance, especially, the performance of teachers in public schools [25].
In addition, the study enhances the understanding of the TL, OTC, and TP culture in the governmental education sector. In so doing, it has contributed to the growth of a national body of literature, and probably to national policy-making. Furthermore, it may be quite possible to extend that generalization to other public education sectors in other cities. This study provides new knowledge in managerial field research by opening a discussion on the importance of organizational teachers’ commitment as a mediating variable and its impact on teachers’ performance. Statistically significant correlations indicate that different organizational teachers’ commitments such as effective, normative, and continuous commitment are significantly related and make positive contributions toward teachers’ performance.
In the context of the public educational sector, this study contributes to the currently existing literature by responding to the call for more research on the relationship between transformational school leadership and teachers’ performance, as the relationship is still not established. Therefore, this study fills in a gap in the literature related to this relationship. The results of the study confirm the significant direct effect of transformational leadership and organizational teacher commitment on teachers’ performance. Moreover, this study shows that the performance of teachers can be improved by incorporating these two variables and their significant roles as a composite construct that supports and contributes to the transformation.
Furthermore, this study has important practical implications for educational leaders and educational policymakers to implement policies and practices that promote sustainability in the school environment. It provides significant insights to them by offering a roadmap that helps in understanding the most influential factors on teachers’ performance in Yemeni public schools. This certainly contributes to improving academic performance through national strategies for education.
Moreover, this study underscores the need for a sustainable teaching performance framework that considers the multidimensionality of sustainable teaching performance. This framework should take into account not only academic performance but also social and emotional factors that contribute to sustainable teaching performance.
In contrast, it is possible that the availability of studies in the literature assessing sustainability among teachers is limited, which may have implications for the generalizability of the findings of the study in the Yemeni context. To address this limitation, future research could examine other factors as well as expand the studied regions to provide a better understanding of the concept of sustainable teaching performance in the Yemeni context.

6. Conclusions

A thorough review of the literature highlighted the significant role of transformational leadership and teacher commitment in Yemeni public schools, but this seems to be overlooked by the educational leadership policy established by the country’s Ministry of Education. Therefore, the main aim of this study was to examine the relationship between transformational leadership (independent variable), teacher’s performance (dependent variable), and teacher commitment (mediating variable). This study succeeded in achieving the research objectives based on the findings.
Four hypotheses were formulated and tested regarding the relationship between transformational leadership and teachers’ commitment and performance in Yemeni public schools. The main contribution of the study is the confirmation of the role of commitment of teachers in public schools, which has sadly been lacking in the literature. The mediation role of teachers’ commitment to the transformational leadership–teacher’s performance relationship is also a significant finding in the literature, indicating the need to combine both commitment and practices of transformational leadership in Yemeni schools for enhanced performance. This study has theoretical and practical contributions, the first of which is its contribution to theory in the form of empirical evidence on the relationship among the studied constructs. The findings can be practically employed and adopted by the Ministry of Education in Yemen by establishing policies concerning the use of transformational leadership practices in schools and the enhancement of commitment of teachers for overall performance improvement.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.R.A. and M.A.; methodology, M.A.; software, M.A.; validation, A.R.A., M.A., G.M.A.N. and A.A.A.; formal analysis, M.A.; investigation, Q.A.; resources, M.A.; data curation, M.A.; writing—original draft preparation M.A.; writing—review and editing, A.R.A.; G.M.A.N. and M.A.; visualization, A.R.A., B.A.H.B. and A.R.A.; supervision, A.R.A.; project administration, M.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by Gulf University, Bahrain. The authors would like to thank Gulf University for supporting this study.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent statement was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table
Table A1. Respondents’ demographic profile.
Table A1. Respondents’ demographic profile.
ItemCategoriesFrequencyPercentage
GenderMale22760.7
Female14739.3
Age>304010.7
30–357118.98
36–409224.6
41–4512132.35
46–50379.89
<50133.48
Educational LevelSecondary education133.48
Diploma6717.91
Bachelor’s degree28275.4
Masters123.21
Work Experience of Teaching>5 years3910.4
6–106617.6
11–157319.5
<15 years19652.4
PositionHeadmaster71.87
Deputy headmaster143.74
Administrative3810.16
Teachers31584.22
Table
Table A2. Internal consistency analysis.
Table A2. Internal consistency analysis.
ConstructItemsLoadingsCronbach’s Alpha (>0.7)CR (>0.7)AVE (>0.5)
Idealized influenceIIN10.7330.8410.8870.612
IIN20.823
IIN30.760
IIN50.813
IIN60.778
Inspirational motivationIM10.7960.8940.9220.703
IM20.802
IM30.833
IM40.887
IM50.870
Intellectual stimulationIS10.7690.8430.8880.614
IS20.794
IS30.808
IS40.796
IS50.749
Individualized considerationIC10.7320.8410.8880.613
IC20.831
IC30.710
IC40.859
IC50.774
Affective commitmentAC10.8280.9840.9220.703
AC20.805
AC30.871
AC50.829
AC60.857
Normative commitmentNC10.7860.8380.8920.676
NC20.919
NC30.703
NC40.866
Continuance commitmentCC30.8260.9670.9670.909
CC40.790
CC50.798
CC60.797
Planning and management teachingPMT10.7890.9110.9280.618
PMT20.820
PMT40.711
PMT50.799
PMT60.779
PMT70.825
PMT80.760
PMT90.800
Partnership with family and communityPFC10.7550.8850.9160.685
PFC20.821
PFC30.885
PFC40.845
PFC50.808
The professionalism of teaching performancePTP10.7980.8810.9130.679
PTP20.829
PTP30.847
PTP40.872
PTP50.791
Assessment and evaluationAE10.7450.8300.8880.665

References

  1. Criollo-C, S.; Altamirano-Suarez, E.; Jaramillo-Villacís, L.; Vidal-Pacheco, K.; Guerrero-Arias, A.; Luján-Mora, S. Sustainable Teaching and Learning through a Mobile Application: A Case Study. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lv, M.; Zhang, H.; Georgescu, P.; Li, T.; Zhang, B. Improving education for innovation and entrepreneurship in Chinese technical universities: A quest for building a sustainable framework. Sustainability 2022, 14, 595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zguir, M.F.; Dubis, S.; Koç, M. Integrating sustainability into curricula: Teachers’ perceptions, preparation and practice in Qatar. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 371, 133167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hennessy, S.; D’Angelo, S.; McIntyre, N.; Koomar, S.; Kreimeia, A.; Cao, L.; Brugha, M.; Zubairi, A.J.C.; Open, E. Technology use for teacher professional development in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Comput. Educ. Open 2022, 3, 100080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Filho, W.L.; Shiel, C.; Paço, A.; Mifsud, M.; Ávila, L.V.; Brandli, L.L.; Molthan-Hill, P.; Pace, P.; Azeiteiro, U.M.; Vargas, V.R.; et al. Sustainable Development Goals and sustainability teaching at universities: Falling behind or getting ahead of the pack? J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 232, 285–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Du, X.; Guerra, A.; Nørgaard, B.; Chaaban, Y.; Lundberg, A.; Lyngdorf, N.E.R. University Teachers’ Change Readiness to Implement Education for Sustainable Development through Participation in a PBL-Based PD Program. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Di Tullio, P.; La Torre, M. Sustainability Reporting at a Crossroads in Italian Universities: Is Web-Based Media Adoption Deinstitutionalising Sustainability Reporting? Adm. Sci. 2022, 12, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Filho, W.L.; Trevisan, L.V.; Dinis, M.A.P.; Sivapalan, S.; Wahaj, Z.; Liakh, O. Ensuring sustainability in internationalisation efforts at higher education institutions. Int. J. Sustain. High. Educ. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gomez, R.E.; Kagan, S.L.; Fox, E.A. Professional development of the early childhood education teaching workforce in the United States: An overview. Prof. Dev. Educ. 2015, 41, 169–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Momete, D.C.; Momete, M.M. Map and track the performance in education for sustainable development across the European Union. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Muijs, D.; Harris, A. Teacher led school improvement: Teacher leadership in the UK. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2006, 22, 961–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Elayah, M.; Al-Sameai, N.; Khodr, H.; Gamar, S.J.N.; Quarterly, V.S. Community-Based Initiatives and Public Services Delivery in a Fragile Context: The Case of Yemen. Nonprofit Volunt. Sect. Q. 2023, 08997640221145182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jameel, A.S.; Ahmad, A.R. The mediating role of job satisfaction between leadership style and performance of academic staff. Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. 2020, 24, 2399–2414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tripon, C.J.S. Supporting Future Teachers to Promote Computational Thinking Skills in Teaching STEM—A Case Study. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bellibaş, M.Ş.; Gümüş, S.; Liu, Y. Does school leadership matter for teachers’ classroom practice? The influence of instructional leadership and distributed leadership on instructional quality. Sch. Eff. Sch. Improv. 2021, 32, 387–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Dawwas, M.I. Employee perception of Talent Management Practices and Employee Engagement: A Multiple Mediator Model. Spec. Ugdym. 2022, 1, 2105–2134. [Google Scholar]
  17. Haron, M.; Abdullah, B.; Kahar, A.; Naji, G.M.A. The Challenger of Market Segments for Private Highereducation in Malaysia: Using Behavioral Segmentation. Int. J. Bus. Manag. Invent. 2017, 6, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lipscombe, K.; Tindall-Ford, S.; Lamanna, J. School middle leadership: A systematic review. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 2021, 51, 270–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rahman, M.R.; Nor, M.Y.M.; Wa, J.L.A.; Suliman, A. The Relationship between Educational Transformational Leadership and Teacher Quality at Secondary School: Total Quality Management as Mediator. Univers. J. Educ. Res. 2020, 8, 6369–6377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Al-Zoriqi, M.S.M.F. The Mediating Effect of Organizational Teachers’ Commitment on the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Teachers’ Performance: A Study in Yemeni Public Schools. Ph.D. Thesis, Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia, Nilai, Malaysia, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  21. Al-Kadi, A. Teacher education during turbulent times in Yemen. In Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Pedagogical Innovations and Practices in the Middle East; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2022; pp. 71–86. [Google Scholar]
  22. Al-Qadasi, N.; Zhang, G.; Al-Awlaqi, M.A.; Alshebami, A.S.; Aamer, A. Factors influencing entrepreneurial intention of university students in Yemen: The mediating role of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Front. Psychol. 2023, 14, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Smith, W.C.; Benavot, A. Improving accountability in education: The importance of structured democratic voice. Asia Pac. Educ. Rev. 2019, 20, 193–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Cheng, M.M.; Cheng, A.Y.; Tang, S.Y. Closing the gap between the theory and practice of teaching: Implications for teacher education programmes in Hong Kong. J. Educ. Teach. 2010, 36, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Alzoraiki, M.; Rahman, O.b.A.; Mutalib, M.A. The effect of the dimensions of transformational leadership on the teachers’ performance in the Yemeni public schools. Eur. Sci. J. ESJ 2018, 14, 322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mohammed, G.; Naji, G.; Shahrul, A.; Isha, N.; Alzoraiki, M.; Sharafuddin, O.; Al-Mekhlafi, A. Enhancement of employees performance via professional training and development: A study on oil and gas companies operating in Yemen. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res. 2020, 9, 7. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ferrer-Estévez, M.; Chalmeta, R. Integrating Sustainable Development Goals in educational institutions. Int. J. Manag. Educ. 2021, 19, 100494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ali, A.A.A.; Yusoffii, S.H.; Aliiii, K. Fundamental of Equal Opportunities in Employee’s Performance: A Critical Review. In Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Integration of Knowledge, Bangi, Malaysia, 29 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  29. Hendri, M.I. The mediation effect of job satisfaction and organizational commitment on the organizational learning effect of the employee performance. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2019, 68, 1208–1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Carlucci, D.; Renna, P.; Izzo, C.; Schiuma, G. Assessing teaching performance in higher education: A framework for continuous improvement. Manag. Decis. 2019, 57, 461–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pratama, A.; Education, M. The Influence Of Transformational Leadership, Job Satisfaction, Motivation And Compensation On Mathematics School TeacherPerformance. Turk. J. Comput. Math. Educ. 2021, 12, 3679–3684. [Google Scholar]
  32. Ahmad, A.R.; Alzoraiki, M.S.M. Towards the Sustainable Teaching Quality Through School Culture and Teachers’ Commitment using PLS-SEM Approach. Asia Proc. Soc. Sci. 2021, 8, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Al-Kuwari, M.M.; Al-Fagih, L.; Koç, M.J.S. Asking the right questions for sustainable development goals: Performance assessment approaches for the Qatar education system. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Berkovich, I.; Bogler, R. Conceptualising the mediating paths linking effective school leadership to teachers’ organisational commitment. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 2021, 49, 410–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Naji, G.M.A.; Isha, A.S.N.; Alazzani, A.; Brough, P.; Saleem, M.S.; Mohyaldinn, M.E.; Alzoraiki, M. Do leadership, organizational communication, and work environment impact employees’ psychosocial hazards in the oil and gas industry? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 4432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Mahfouz, S.A.; Awang, Z.; Muda, H.; Bahkia, A.S.J.H.; Reviews, S.S. Mediating role of employee commitment in the relationship between transformational leadership style and employee performance. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Rev. 2020, 8, 624–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Park, J.; Han, S.J.; Kim, J.; Kim, W. Structural relationships among transformational leadership, affective organizational commitment, and job performance: The mediating role of employee engagement. Eur. J. Train. Dev. 2021, 46, 920–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nellitawati, N. Establishing Teachers’ Personality Competence through the Principal’s Leadership Role in Vocational High School. Int. J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. 2020, 24, 5524–5532. [Google Scholar]
  39. Weller, I.; Süß, J.; Evanschitzky, H.; von Wangenheim, F. Transformational leadership, high-performance work system consensus, and customer satisfaction. J. Manag. 2020, 46, 1469–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Han, S.-H.; Oh, E.G.; Kang, S. The link between transformational leadership and work-related performance: Moderated-mediating roles of meaningfulness and job characteristics. Leadersh. Organ. Dev. J. 2020, 41, 519–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sánchez-Rosas, J.; Dyzenchauz, M.; Freiberg-Hoffmann, A.; García-Rubiano, M.; Okinishi, M. Transformational leadership and collective teacher self-efficacy: The mediating role of satisfaction with job resources. Int. J. Instr. 2023, 16, 801–820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, Y.; Bellibas, M.S. School factors that are related to school principals’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Int. J. Educ. Res. 2018, 90, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Saleem, M.S.; Isha, A.S.N.; Awan, M.I.; Yusop, Y.B.; Naji, G.M.A. Fostering academic engagement in post-graduate students: Assessing the role of positive emotions, positive psychology, and stress. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 920395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Manzoor, F.; Wei, L.; Nurunnabi, M.; Subhan, Q.A.; Shah, S.I.A.; Fallatah, S.J.S. The impact of transformational leadership on job performance and CSR as mediator in SMEs. Sustainability 2019, 11, 436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Avolio, B.; Bass, B.M. Full Range Leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire; Mind Garden: Menlo Park, CA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  46. Milhem, M.; Muda, H.; Ahmed, K. Transformational Leadership Style on Employee Engagement: Using Structural Education Modeling (SEM). Int. J. Mod. Trends Soc. Sci. 2019, 2, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Bass, B.M.; Avolio, B.J. Developing transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. J. Eur. Ind. Train. 1990, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Naji, G.M.A.; Isha, A.S.N.; Alazzani, A.; Saleem, M.S.; Alzoraiki, M. Assessing the mediating role of safety communication between safety culture and employees safety performance. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 840281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Berson, Y.; Shamir, B.; Avolio, B.J.; Popper, M. The relationship between vision strength, leadership style, and context. Leadersh. Q. 2001, 12, 53–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Isha, A.S.N.; Naji, G.M.A.; Saleem, M.S.; Brough, P.; Alazzani, A.; Ghaleb, E.A.A.; Muneer, A.; Alzoraiki, M. Validation of “Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scales” and “Changes in Psychological Distress during COVID-19” among University Students in Malaysia. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Saleem, M.S.; Isha, A.S.N.; Mohd Yusop, Y.; Awan, M.I.; Naji, G.M.A. Agility and Safety Performance among Nurses: The Mediating Role of Mindful Organizing. Nurs. Rep. 2021, 11, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ebrahim, A.A.; Dominic, P.D.; Alzoraiki, M.; Mohamed, I.; AL-Ashmori, A. The Role of Transformational Leadership Style and Intellectual Capital in Improving the Service Quality of the Public Healthcare Sector in Developing Countries–Conceptual Study. Int. J. Intellect. Hum. Resour. Manag. (IJIHRM) 2022, 3, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Thompson, G.; Buch, R.; Thompson, P.-M.M.; Glasø, L. The impact of transformational leadership and interactional justice on follower performance and organizational commitment in a business context. J. Gen. Manag. 2021, 46, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Dou, D.; Devos, G.; Valcke, M. The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educ. Manag. Adm. Leadersh. 2017, 45, 959–977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Saleem, M.S.; Isha, A.S.N.; Yusop, Y.M.; Awan, M.I.; Naji, G.M.A. The role of psychological capital and work engagement in enhancing construction workers’ safety behavior. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Meyer, J.P.; Allen, N.J. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 1991, 1, 61–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ali, A.A.A. The Relationship between Islamic Work Ethics and Employee Performance among Medical Staff in the Public Health Sector in Bahrain: Employee Commitment as Mediating Variable; Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia: Nilai, Malaysia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lambert, E.G.; Keena, L.D.; Leone, M.; May, D.; Haynes, S.H. The effects of distributive and procedural justice on job satisfaction and organizational commitment ofcorrectional staff. Soc. Sci. J. 2020, 57, 405–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Liza, U.H.; Naji, G.M.A.; Ghaleb, E.A.; Alzoraiki, M. A study on customer loyalty, customer trust, and market orientation towards online business in Saudi Arabia. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Sustainable Islamic Business and Finance, Sakheer, Bahrain, 5–6 December 2021; pp. 119–128. [Google Scholar]
  60. Naji, G.M.A.; Isha, A.S.N.; Alzoraiki, M.; Sharafaddin, O.; Ghaleb, E.A.; Ammar, A.-A. Executive Compensation-Ethical Issues in Human Resource. Int. J. Intellect. Hum. Resour. Manag. (IJIHRM) 2022, 3, 17–22. [Google Scholar]
  61. Da’As, R.; Qadach, M. Examining organizational absorptive capacity construct: A validation study in the school context. Leadersh. Policy Sch. 2020, 19, 327–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Freeman, G.; Fields, D. School leadership in an urban context: Complicating notions of effective principal leadership, organizational setting, and teacher commitment to students. Int. J. Leadersh. Educ. 2020, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Saleh, R.M.M.; Nusari, M.; Habtoor, N.; Isaac, O. The effect of leadership style on organizational performance: Organizational commitment as a mediator variable in the manufacturing sector of Yemen. Int. J. Manag. Hum. Sci. (IJMHS) 2018, 2, 13–24. [Google Scholar]
  64. Al-Maamari, Q.A.; Alkadash, T.; Al-Absy, M.S.; Nagi, M.; Abdullah, M.A. The mediation impact of organizational commitment on the total quality management practices and individual readiness for tqm implementation within yemeni oil units. Int. J. Qual. Res. 2021, 15, 595–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Donkor, F.; Dongmei, Z.; Sekyere, I. The mediating effects of organizational commitment on leadership styles and employee performance in SOEs in Ghana: A structural equation modeling analysis. Sage Open 2021, 11, 21582440211008894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Almutairi, D.O. The mediating effects of organizational commitment on the relationship between transformational leadership style and job performance. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2016, 11, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Yeap, S.B.; Abdullah, A.G.K.; Thien, L.M. Lecturers’ commitment to teaching entrepreneurship: Do transformational leadership, mindfulness and readiness for change matter? J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 2020, 13, 164–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Saleem, M.S.; Isha, A.S.N.B.; Benson, C.; Awan, M.I.; Naji, G.M.A.; Yusop, Y.B. Analyzing the impact of psychological capital and work pressure on employee job engagement and safety behavior. Front. Public Health 2022, 10, 1086843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Brace, I. Questionnaire Design: How to Plan, Structure and write survey Material for Effective Market Research; Kogan Page Publishers: London, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  70. Kumar, R. Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  71. Sekaran, U.; Bougie, R. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  72. Cunningham, C.T.; Quan, H.; Hemmelgarn, B.; Noseworthy, T.; Beck, C.A.; Dixon, E.; Samuel, S.; Ghali, W.A.; Sykes, L.L.; Jetté, N. Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2015, 15, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  73. Fink, A. How to Conduct Surveys: A Step-by-Step Guide; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  74. Nardi, P.M. Doing Survey Research: A Guide to Quantitative Methods; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  75. Brownell, L.; Naik, P. Does method of distribution improve GPs’ response rate in questionnaire studies? J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2001, 55, 687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Hair, J.F., Jr.; Matthews, L.M.; Matthews, R.L.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. Int. J. Multivar. Data Anal. 2017, 1, 107–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Rigdon, E.E. Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. Eur. Manag. J. 2016, 34, 598–605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Naji, G.M.A.; Isha, A.S.N.; Mohyaldinn, M.E.; Leka, S.; Saleem, M.S.; Rahman, S.M.N.B.S.A.; Alzoraiki, M. Impact of safety culture on safety performance; mediating role of psychosocial hazard: An integrated modelling approach. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 8568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Chin, W.W. How to write up and report PLS analyses. In Handbook of Partial Least Squares; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; pp. 655–690. [Google Scholar]
  80. Baron, R.M.; Kenny, D.A. The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1986, 51, 1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Sungu, L.J.; Weng, Q.; Xu, X. Organizational commitment and job performance: Examining the moderating roles of occupational commitment and transformational leadership. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 2019, 27, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Al Balushi, F.S.M.; Ali, A.A.A.; Alzoraiki, M. The Impact of Forecasting Strategy and Training and Development Strategy on Preparing Leadership Competencies Administrative Support in the Sultanate of Oman. Int. J. Intellect. Hum. Resour. Manag. (IJIHRM) 2022, 3, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Meyer, J.P.; Allen, N.J. Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application; Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  84. Özgenel, M. An antecedent of teacher performance: Occupational commitment. Int. J. Eurasian Educ. Cult. 2019, 7, 100–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Al, A.A.A.; Yusoff, S.H.; Ali, K. The relationship between equal opportunities and employee performance: A special reference to with spesific refence to bdf hospital in the kingdom of bahrain. Int. E-J. Adv. Soc. Sci. 2019, 14, 1200–1206. [Google Scholar]
  86. Haftkhavani, Z.G.; Faghiharam, B.; Araghieh, A.J.P.-S.; Sciences, B. Organizational Commitment and Academic Performance (Case study: Students at secondary schools for girls). Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 69, 1529–1538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Sustainability 15 04620 g001 550
Figure 1. Bootstrapping and t-value.
Figure 1. Bootstrapping and t-value.
Sustainability 15 04620 g001
Table
Table 1. Fornell and Larcker’s discriminant validity.
Table 1. Fornell and Larcker’s discriminant validity.
ACAECCICIINIMISNCPFCPMTPTP
AC0.838
AE0.2520.816
CC0.6360.2060.954
IC0.1370.1250.3110.783
IIN0.112−0.0060.2910.6890.782
IM0.1670.1080.3360.6540.7360.838
IS0.1530.1320.3210.7270.6800.7160.784
NC0.6600.2200.3520.3380.3230.3760.3480.822
PFC0.2550.5810.4030.3790.2710.3580.4000.4210.828
PMT0.2570.6790.2840.2500.2160.2650.3980.3250.6490.786
PTP0.2860.2820.2630.1920.1020.1840.2840.3220.6120.7720.824
IIN = idealized influence; IM = inspirational motivation; IS = intellectual stimulation; IC = individualized consideration; AC = affective commitment; NC = normative commitment; CC = continuance commitment; PMT = planning and management teaching; PFC = partnership with family and community; PTP = professionalism of teaching performance; AE = assessment and evaluation of students.
Table
Table 2. Results of hypotheses testing. *** indicated that the hypothesis are highly significant.
Table 2. Results of hypotheses testing. *** indicated that the hypothesis are highly significant.
No.HypothesisRelationshipPath Coefficientt-Valuep-ValueDecision
1H1TFL → TC0.3557.354 ***0.000Supported
2H2TC → TP0.3425.453 ***0.000Supported
3H3TFL → TP0.1862.994 ***0.001Supported
4H4TFL → TC → TP0.1224.142 ***0.000Supported
Table
Table 3. Mediating variable analysis—Preacher and Hayes (2008).
Table 3. Mediating variable analysis—Preacher and Hayes (2008).
IV → MVMV → DVSE = SD For Indirect EffectBootstrapped Confidence Interval
Path aPath bIndirect EffectSE.t-Value95% LL95% UL
MV (TFL → TC → TP)0.3550.3420.1220.0294.1890.0650.197
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alzoraiki, M.; Ahmad, A.R.; Ateeq, A.A.; Naji, G.M.A.; Almaamari, Q.; Beshr, B.A.H. Impact of Teachers’ Commitment to the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Sustainable Teaching Performance. Sustainability 2023, 15, 4620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054620

AMA Style

Alzoraiki M, Ahmad AR, Ateeq AA, Naji GMA, Almaamari Q, Beshr BAH. Impact of Teachers’ Commitment to the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Sustainable Teaching Performance. Sustainability. 2023; 15(5):4620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054620

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alzoraiki, Mohammed, Abd Rahman Ahmad, Ali Ahmed Ateeq, Gehad Mohammed Ahmed Naji, Qais Almaamari, and Baligh Ali Hasan Beshr. 2023. "Impact of Teachers’ Commitment to the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Sustainable Teaching Performance" Sustainability 15, no. 5: 4620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054620

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop