Next Article in Journal
How Has COVID-19 Changed the Way We Travel? Exploring Tourist Personality, Reactions to the Perceived Risk and Change in Travel Behavior
Previous Article in Journal
Hierarchical Multimodal Hub Location Problem with Carbon Emissions
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 15
Issue 3
10.3390/su15031952
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Mediating Role of Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities in the Effect of Social Customer Relationship Management on Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Study on SMEs in Saudi Arabia

by
Sultan Alaswad Alenazi
1 and
Tawfeeq Mohammed Alanazi
2,*
1
Marketing Department, College of Business, King Saud University, Riyadh 11362, Saudi Arabia
2
Marketing Department, Faculty of Business Administration, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 47512, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(3), 1952; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031952
Submission received: 6 December 2022 / Revised: 10 January 2023 / Accepted: 11 January 2023 / Published: 19 January 2023
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aims at investigating the mediating role of sustainable dynamic capabilities in the effect of social customer relationship management on sustainable competitive advantage using data gathered from a convenience sample consisted of 243 managers of SMEs in Saudi Arabia via an electronic questionnaire. Using structural equation modeling by SmartPLS3.0, the study pointed out social customer relationship management is positively related to both sustainable competitive advantage and sustainable dynamic capabilities. The latter is positively associated to sustainable competitive advantage and hence, significantly mediated the effect of social customer relationship management on sustainable competitive advantage. The study contributes to the literature through filling a research gap as research on the relationship between s-CRM and dynamic capabilities in Saudi Arabia is still scarce, confirming the importance of social customer relationship management in sustaining both dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage. SMEs are required to invest in CRM and build sustainable resources and capabilities to elevate sustainable competitive advantage.

1. Introduction

Sustainability is the way by which people and firms reserve resources for future generations. Business firms, large, medium, or small, are not excluded. These firms are responsible for not only sustaining external resources but also their internal resources. On the basis of the resource-based view (RBV), internal resources are crucial factors for firms’ competitiveness, which depends on how firms enhance their strategic resources [1], such as social customer relationship management (s-CRM) [2], upon which firms’ dynamic capabilities are created [3]. Hence this study is designed to shed light on the interactions between s-CRM, firms’ sustainable dynamic capabilities, and firms’ sustainable competitive advantage.
Recent works on sustainable competitive advantage highlights the importance of sustainable dynamic capabilities [4,5], relational social commerce capabilities [6,7,8], technological capabilities [9], as well as social and technological challenges like corporate social responsibility, beliefs, and information technology trust and implementation success [10,11,12] for companies to create a sustainable competitive advantage.
Research on the effects of CRM, particularly s-CRM, encompass works that explored CRM nature in enterprises from different sizes [8,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20], works that looked at the impacts of CRM on business outcomes such as performance, competitive advantage, and business sustainability [21,22,23,24,25,26,27], and works that investigated the impact of CRM on customer outcomes such as customer satisfaction [28], customer involvement [2], customer loyalty [29], and customer empowerment [30]. However, little research has been carried out to investigate the impact of s-CRM on sustainable competitive advantage, principally, in small and medium-sized business enterprises in developing countries.
On the other hand, as a key driver of corporate sustainability, sustainable dynamic capability can be developed through addressing the challenges of internal stakeholders such as employees and external stakeholders such as customers to create sustainable competitive advantage [5]. Ensuring sustainable business performance requires not only the traditional components of business success such as quality, tangible assets, and cost control but also the dynamic capabilities, i.e., sensing opportunities and threats, seizing opportunities, and reconfiguring assets, that are required to advance business models, cultivate new products, and modify according to customer changing demands [31].
Research on the relationship between s-CRM and dynamic capabilities is still rare. Yet, such a relationship can be established based on some previous works who found that the dynamic capabilities (sensing skills, alliance management capacity, reconfiguration capability, learning capability, coordinating capability, and integrating capability) play a significant mediating role between entrepreneurial business networks (interactions of suppliers, customers, and business competitors) and sustainable performance [32], and such capabilities help companies shaping market demand, obtaining new resources, and improving customer relationship management [33]. Furthermore, previous works highlight the importance of dynamic capabilities sensing capability, technological flexibility, organizational flexibility, and reconfiguring capability in creating competitive advantage [34]. In fact, the current study is drawn by a key question on the mediating role of sustainable dynamic capabilities in the effect of social customer relationship management on sustainable competitive advantage.
Consequently, this study aims at investigating the impact of s-CRM on sustainable competitive advantage through sustainable dynamic capabilities. The importance of carrying out such a study lies in its contribution to both scholars and managers of SMEs in developing countries. It was noted that small size firms use social media to communicate with customers more than large firms [18]. In Saudi Arabia, SMEs’ contribution to the gross domestic product (GDP) is relatively about 33% [21], which initiates a significant call for a study on the impact of using social media platforms in SMEs to develop and manage effective relationships with customers. The study fulfills a considerable research gap on the impact of s-CRM on sustainable competitive advantage and the mediating part of sustainable dynamic capabilities between these two constructs. Moreover, the study instructs the managers of SMEs how to direct s-CRM to gain a sustained competitive advantage.

2. Literature Review, Hypotheses, and Research Model

2.1. S-CRM

CRM refers to one-way method used by firms to communicate with their customers while s-CRM is a two-way approach employed to boost strong relationships with customers using social media networks, hence, s-CRM represents an integration between CRM and social media [35]. Definitions of s-CRM accentuate elements such as social media platforms (e.g., Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, Twitter), information, ideas, photos, and news sharing, customer cooperative conversations, real-time sensing of customer perspectives, firms’ connection to new customers, and firms’ efforts to retain current customers [2,17,36]. Benefits of using s-CRM encompass boosting brand visibility, customer loyalty, firm performance, firm image and reputation [17], customer engagement [13], innovation through customer involvement [2]. Measurements of s-CRM cover issues such as information generation, information dissemination, and responsiveness. Examples of these items include using social media to accomplish market research, detect changes in customer preferences, discussions of customer future requirements, assessment of customer satisfaction, track customer changing needs [2]. Moreover, s-CRM can be evaluated based on factors such as customer social media data, customer-oriented relationships, and customer communications [37].
Research on s-CRM comprises numerous industries to achieve different objectives such as determining its effect on customer satisfaction and retention [38], customer loyalty and empowerment [37], the actual use of s-CRM in firms [39], s-CRM adoption in SMEs [8]. In Saudi Arabia, the majority of previous works are interested in CRM rather than s-CRM. Examples of studies on CRM take in critical success factors of implementing CRM [40,41,42], CRM adoption [43], the impact of CRM on hospitals performance [44], and on s-CRM embrace investigating the relevance of s-CRM for business processes in tourism industry [45], exploring the effect of s-CRM on customer purchase intention [46], as well as s-CRM adoption [47].

2.2. Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities

Organizational capabilities can be divided into two types: ordinary capabilities and dynamic capabilities [48]. The first type refers to capabilities that enable a firm to carry out its current operations, while the second one, which changes the first one, refers to capabilities that enable a firm to change through sensing and seizing new business opportunities [21,48,49,50,51]. Dynamic capabilities have been defined as “the firm’s ability to integrate, build, and reconfigure internal and external competences to address rapidly changing environments” [52]. It was also defined as “the capacity of an organization to purposefully create, extend, and modify its resource base. The resource base includes the tangible, intangible, and human assets or resources, as well as capabilities which the organization owns, controls, or has access to on a preferential basis” [53]. In terms of dynamic capabilities measurements, these dynamic capabilities can be measured using four types of data related to managers’ evaluations, financial data, a firm’s experience, actions, and performance, as well as managers and employees’ experience, actions, and performance [48].
Sustainable dynamic capability has been defined as “the set of sustainability-focused capabilities sufficiently dynamic to renew, revise, and adapt according to the requirements of the ever business environment” [5]. Such capabilities refer to those used to adjust the business environment or help firms to adapt to unexpected changes [54]. Sustainable dynamic capabilities are created if these capabilities meet at least one of these two conditions, i.e., to origin change or to support the firm to adapt to unexpected changes [55]. These sustainable capabilities are measured based on items related to five factors: (1) cross-functional integration among functional departments to share information on competitors’ movements, customer needs, (2) employees shared vision on how to gain and use organizational resources to create sustainable practices, (3) technology sensing to be aware of technology advancements, (4) organizational learning in terms of information acquiring, processing, and using on issues such as changing customer requirements, and (6) relationship building with customers, suppliers and other stakeholders [55,56].

2.3. Sustainable Competitive Advantage

Attainment of competitive advantage as a fundamental goal of strategic management refers to exceeding competitors in terms of decisions on resources and capabilities allocation to achieve the intended goals [57]. Maintaining such an advantage for a long time renders it into sustained competitive advantage [58]. Sustainable competitive advantage has been measured using numerous items related to a firm’s superior quality, its differentiated and advanced services and products, value offered to customers in comparison with competitors [59]. Other studies assessed sustainable competitive advantage using items on availability of the required resources, and firms’ ability to develop inimitable resources [57], and items on collecting market information to deal with high-risk problems and to develop new projects, in addition to gathering customer information to improve products or market strategy [58], or items related to employee creativity, flexibility, and concern for quality [60]. Sustainable competitive advantage has been conceptualized in terms of responsiveness to customer needs, efficiency, and superiority in quality and innovation [61].
Research on sustainable competitive advantage was largely concerned with investigating the factors that exert significant effects on such a construct. Examples of prior works include the effect of social and technological challenges [12], high-performance work practices [59], market innovation [57], technological capabilities [62], green innovation strategy [58], and strategic human resource practices [60], big data capability [63], human resource strategies [61] on sustainable competitive advantage. On the other hand, some studies explored how firms can achieve a competitive advantage through CRM [26], CRM as a source of sustainable competitive advantage, the role of CRM and innovation in improving a firm competitive advantage [64]. However, there is a need to examine the effect of s-CRM on sustainable competitive advantage.

2.4. S-CRM and Sustainable Competitive Advantage

In line with the assumptions of the RBV, tangible and intangible resources are critical factors to achieve sustainable competitive advantage [12]. These resources should be VARIN, i.e., valuable, rare, inimitable, and non-substitutable [59]. The RBV explains how firms transform their unique resources and capabilities into new functions that will assist firms to develop SCA [65]. Firms’ relational capital (e.g., social capital) has been deemed as a pivotal resource in gaining a sustainable competitive advantage [66]. In this regard, the researchers defined social capital as social relationships with customers, firms, and other stakeholders. Hence, s-CRM represents a crucial factor for firms to form sustainable competitive advantage. Despite these results, further investigations are required to clarify how firms can form sustainable competitive advantage through relational capital [66]. That is why the following hypothesis was proposed:
Hypothesis 1 (H1).
S-CRM significantly predicts sustainable competitive advantage.

2.5. S-CRM and Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities

A key point from which one can initiate a link between s-CRM and sustainable dynamic capabilities is the intersection where these two constructs are met. On the one hand, the presence of sustainable dynamic capabilities in a firm can be assessed on the basis of the ability to use its resources and capabilities to change its current status quo or to cope with changing environments [52] or in other words to adapt to unexpected changes [54]. These arguments are in line with the current assumption of the RBV, in other words, the dynamic resource-based view [67]. A firm shows such an ability through building relationships with its stakeholders such as customers, learning how to collect, process, and use customers’ information to address their changing requirements, as well as using its resources in a sustainable fashion [55]. On the other hand, s-CRM assists firms with the help of social media platforms and data [37] to detect changes in customer present needs and explore their future preferences [2]. Hence, it is noted that s-CRM supports a firm’s ability to develop its own sustainable dynamic capabilities, which are, according to the resource-based view, critical factors required to facilitate SMEs success [68]. In order to investigate the effect of s-CRM on sustainable dynamic capabilities using the current research data, it was hypothesized that:
Hypothesis 2 (H2).
S-CRM significantly predicts of sustainable dynamic capabilities.

2.6. Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities and Sustainable Competitive Advantage

The dynamic capabilities framework developed by Teece consists of three key elements: resources, capabilities, and strategies. Resources that are critical for creating sustainable competitive advantage should be VARIN resources, i.e., valuable, rare, imperfectly imitable, and non-substitutable [69]. The RBV assumes that firms’ resources and capabilities are pivotal foundations for firms’ competitive advantage [67]. A significant vein of the literature regarded these sustainable dynamic capabilities as a direct source of firm competitive advantage while another vein argues that such capabilities have an indirect effect on competitive advantage through other capabilities such as capabilities of research and development, and capabilities of making strategic decisions [58]. The dominant vein is the first one in which sustainable dynamic capabilities were positively linked to sustainable completive advantage [5]. Sustainable dynamic capabilities enable firms to respond to customer changing demands and, therefore, improve their sustainable performance [31], as firms can benefit from their dynamic capabilities to create a competitive advantage [34]. Thus, it was deduced that:
Hypothesis 3 (H3).
Sustainable dynamic capabilities significantly predict sustainable competitive advantage.

2.7. S-CRM, Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities

The key benefits of s-CRM such as building strong relationships with customers [35] and elevating a firm’s performance [17] in line with the core functions of SDCs such as enabling firms to adapt to the requirements of business environment [5], lift firms’ SCA in terms of their competencies to provide differentiated products and services [57]. In this regard, SDCs work as a bridge between s-CRM and SCA, that is, s-CRM equips SDCs with the required information to sense and seize business opportunities and SDCs enable the firms to add value to their customers [57]. On the basis of the RBV, both s-CRM and SDCs are integrated to produce new capabilities [67]. Therefore, it was expected that SDCs play an intervening part in the relationship between s-CRM and SCA. Scholars indicate that s-CRM strengthens the firm’s ability to track, detect, and meet customer needs [37], which means that s-CRM supports the formation of sustainable dynamic capabilities, which in turn results in sustainable competitive advantage [5]. So, it was thought that the effect of s-CRM on SDA is mediated by SDCs as stated in the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 4 (H4).
Sustainable dynamic capabilities significantly mediate the effect of s-CRM on sustainable competitive advantage.

2.8. Research Conceptual Model

Figure 1 illustrates the research hypotheses developed in the previous sections. It shows four hypothesized paths from the independent variable (s-CRM) to the dependent one (sustainable competitive advantage) (H1), from s-CRM to the mediating variable (sustainable dynamic capabilities) (H2) and form sustainable dynamic capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage (H3), in addition to an indirect path from s-CRM to sustainable competitive advantage through sustainable dynamic capabilities (H4).

3. Research Methods

3.1. Research Sample and Data Collection

SMEs in Saudi Arabia refers to enterprises have less than 249 employees and less than SAR 200 million revenue. About 85% of these SMEs are sole proprietorship and employed about 37% of the workforce. A high percent (74%) of these SMEs works in trade and construction (Tripathi, 2019). The population of this study comprises the managers of SMEs. Using a priori sample size for structural equation models (https://www.danielsoper.com, in 21 November 2022) with five conditions, i.e., a medium effect size (0.3), a statistical power (0.8), a probability level (0.05) in line with the current number of latent variables (3) and their related observed variables (15), the recommended sample size was 119 respondents. Keeping this number in mind, a convenience sampling technique was used to collect as many responses as possible via an electronic questionnaire designed and administered using Google Form. A total of 243 usable questionnaires were collected. Previous studies on SMEs in Saudi Arabia carried out their analyses using 117 usable questionnaires [70], 259 responses [71], and 408 questionnaires [72]. These responses were gathered over three weeks in April 2022. Data on the independent variable (s-CRM) were collected in the first week, followed by a second week to gather data on the mediating variable (sustainable dynamic capabilities), and data on the dependent variable (sustainable competitive advantage) was collected in the third week.

3.2. Research Measurements

A scalable measure based on Likert’s 5-point design was developed to measure research variables. First, s-CRM was evaluated using six items following [2]. Sustainable dynamic capabilities were measured by four items adopted from previous works [55,56]. Moreover, five items were adapted from prior studies to assess sustainable competitive advantage [57,58,61].

3.3. Validity and Reliability

Smart PLS 3.0 software was used to analyze research data. According to [73], PLS-SEM does not need normally distributed data and has a higher statistical power. Validity was measured based on convergent validity; discriminant validity was measured using factor loadings (FL); the average variance extracted (AVE) was measured to assess convergent validity; and the Heterotrait–Monotrait (HTMT) ratio was measured to test discriminant validity. AVE values should be higher than 0.50 and HTMT values should be less than 0.85 [74]. On the other hand, reliability was evaluated on the basis of Cronbach’s alpha coefficients (α) and composite reliability (CR). The values of these two indices should be higher than 0.70 [74]. The results in Table 1 show acceptable values of both validity and reliability indices, i.e., factor loadings are higher than 0.50, AVE value are above 0.60, HTMT values are below 0.85, alpha coefficients and CR value are more than 0.70.

3.4. Structural Model Fit

Four indices were used as indicators of the structural model fit. These indices are: The standardized root mean square residual (SRMR), squared Euclidean distance (d_ULS) and Geodesic distance (d_G) d_ULS, d_G, and the normed fit index (NFI). The recommended cut-off values of these indices are: SRMR should be less than 0.1, values of d_ULS and d_G should be more than 0.05, and NFI value should be higher than 0.80 [75]. The results in Table 2 display acceptable values of model fit indices.

4. Results and Discussion

4.1. Research Structural Model

Figure 2 depicts the structural model that was used to test research hypotheses. It shows in line with the results in Table 3 that s-CRM is a significant predictor of sustainable competitive advantage (β = 0.224, p = 0.003), and is also a significant predictor of sustainable dynamic capabilities (β = 0.254, p = 0.004), which in turn exerts a significant effect on sustainable competitive advantage (β = 0.234, p = 0.006). Moreover, the results point out that sustainable dynamic capabilities play a significant mediating role in this concern (β = 0.059, p = 0.040). The figure shows that R-square of SDCs is 0.065 and R-square of SCA is 0.131, with small effect sizes, i.e., f square value is less than 0.15, as shown in Table 3.
It is observed that the research hypotheses (H1, H2, H3, and H4) were supported as all significant levels are accepted at a significant level of 0.05. That is, s-CRM is a significant predictor of sustainable dynamic capabilities and both of them significantly predict sustainable significant predictors of sustainable competitive advantage.

4.2. S-CRM and Sustainable Competitive Advantage

The first hypothesis on the effect of s-CRM on sustainable competitive advantage was supported, which means that s-CRM is one crucial factor to form sustainable competitive advantage. In fact, such a result was not found in the literature as there is a lack of previous studies on the effect of s-CRM on sustainable competitive advantage. However, this result could be explained in line with the resource-based view through deeming s-CRM as a component of a firm’s social capital as it assists firms to acquire social data to develop good customer relationships and to meet the customer’sever-changing needs [2]. Such intangible resources lead to higher potential to form and maintain sustainable competitive advantage [12,66].

4.3. S-CRM and Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities

The second hypothesis on the effect of s-CRM on sustainable dynamic capabilities was also supported. s-CRM has been regarded as a practice of enriching firms’ dynamic capabilities through superior functions such as understanding customer needs, acquiring, and integrating information to generate new solutions and innovative products [76]. Moreover, s-CRM provides necessary data required to strengthen the firm’s ability to adapt to unexpected changes in its environment [52,54] such as changes in customers’ needs and preferences [2,37]. Therefore, s-CRM supports the firm’s ability to develop its sustainable dynamic capabilities.

4.4. Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities and Sustainable Competitive Advantage

The third hypothesis on the effect of sustainable dynamic capabilities on sustainable competitive advantage was accepted. A firm with a sustainable competitive advantage is able to exceed its competitors in using its resources and capabilities [57] for a long time [58] to achieve numerous goals including responding to customer chaining requirements [61]. Such an ability can be developed through possessing the capabilities that enrich the firm’s ability to adapt to the changes in its business environment, which are called sustainable dynamic capabilities [5,55]. The RBV assumes that the achievement of SCA is enforced by such dynamic capabilities [76].

4.5. S-CRM, Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities

The fourth hypothesis on the mediating role of sustainable dynamic capabilities between s-CRM and sustainable competitive advantage was validated, which means that sustainable competitive advantage can be created by s-CRM and sustainable dynamic capabilities. This result indicates that s-CRM as a social capital supports a firm’s ability to adapt to its environment more effectively and efficiently compared to its competitors based on its dynamic capabilities. This result confirms that a company’s intangible resources such as social capital, information technology, and dynamic capabilities are vital sources to achieve sustainable competitive advantage.

5. Conclusions

The current study investigated the mediating role of sustainable dynamic capabilities in the effect of s-CRM on sustainable competitive advantage and confirmed such a mediating role. Based on this result it was concluded that firms can form and sustain their competitive advantage through using social customer relationship management and building their own sustainable dynamic capabilities, which means that sustainability can be achieved using both tangible and intangible assets. For the current study, intangible assets such as social capital and dynamic capabilities are important resources for sustainability.

6. Theoretical and Managerial Implications

Theoretically, this study has three theoretical implications. First, the study investigated the effect of s-CRM on both sustainable dynamic capabilities and hence fills a research gap in this context. No previous works were found on the effect of s-CRM on sustainable dynamic capacities. Second, the study provided empirical evidence on the importance of s-CRM in sustaining both dynamic capabilities and competitive advantage. Third, the study elaborates the importance of the integration between firms’ sustainable dynamic capabilities and s-CRM to develop sustainable competitive advantage. Therefore, the study adds empirical evidence to the assumptions of the RBV about the integration of firms’ resources and dynamic capabilities to foster competitiveness. These results call researchers for further investigations. Empirically, the study highlights the importance of s-CRM in sustaining a firm’s competitive advantage as well as the importance of sustainable dynamic capabilities to achieve the same goal. Therefore, managers of SMEs in Saudi Arabia are informed that taking a significant position in a competitive market requires sustainable resources and capabilities such as social customer relationship management as a key ingredient of the firm’s social capital, as well as sustainable dynamic capabilities such as the ability to sense and seize business opportunities and threats. It should be noted that s-CRM and sustainable dynamic capabilities can be used as major resources to develop sustainable competitive advantage. Furthermore, managers of SMEs in other adjacent countries can benefit from sustainability as a comprehensive system to develop sustainable inputs such as sustainable capabilities to produce sustainable outputs such as sustainable competitive advantage. Along with the lines of the RBV, SMEs should increase their investments in CRM.

7. Limitations and Future Research Directions

This study is limited to its sample, which was comprised of managers of SMEs in Saudi Arabia, hence, future research should consider samples of other participants such as SMEs employees and samples from other countries to generalize the current results. Moreover, all constructs were tested using a first-order conceptualizations, so, second order measures are required in future studies. One study [58] recognized a different mediating role of dynamic capabilities between green innovation strategy and sustainable competitive advantage due to environmental uncertainty, i.e., dynamic capabilities mediated the effect of green innovation strategy on sustainable competitive advantage if the level of the environmental uncertainty is low. Consequently, researchers are requested to test the mediating role of sustainable dynamic capabilities between s-CRM and sustainable competitive advantage considering the moderating part of environmental uncertainty.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.A. and T.M.A.; supervision, S.A.A.; methodology, T.M.A.; software, T.M.A.; validation, S.A.A. and T.M.A.; formal analysis, T.M.A.; investigation, S.A.A.; resources, S.A.A.; data curation, T.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, S.A.A. and T.M.A..; writing—review and editing, S.A.A. and T.M.A.; visualization, S.A.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Singh, S.K.; Gupta, S.; Busso, D.; Kamboj, S. Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 128, 788–798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cheng, C.C.; Shiu, E.C. How to enhance SMEs customer involvement using social media: The role of Social CRM. Int. SmallBus. J. 2019, 37, 22–42 . [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bejinaru, R. Ștefancel Mare University of Suceava Dynamic Capabilities of Universities in the Knowledge Economy. Manag. Dyn. Knowl. Econ. 2017, 5, 577–595. [Google Scholar]
  4. Al-Zyadat, A.T.; Alsaraireh, J.M.; Al-Husban, D.A.O.; Al-Shorman, H.M.; Mohammad, A.A.S.; Alathamneh, F.F.; Al-Hawary, S.I.S. The effect of industry 4.0 on sustainability of industrial organizations in Jordan. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 2022, 6, 1437–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Bari, N.; Chimhundu, R.; Chan, K.-C. Dynamic Capabilities to Achieve Corporate Sustainability: A Roadmap to Sustained Competitive Advantage. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Al-Nawafah, S.S.; Al-Shorman, H.M.; Aityassine, F.L.Y.; Khrisat, F.A.; Hunitie, M.F.A.; Mohammad, A.; Al-Hawary, S.I.S. The effect of supply chain management through social media on competitiveness of the private hospitals in Jordan. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2022, 10, 737–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aityassine, F.; Aldiabat, B.; Al-rjoub, S.; Aldaihani, F.; Al-Shorman, H.; Al-Hawary, S. The mediating effect of just in time on the relationship between green supply chain management practices and performance in the manufacturing companies. Uncertain Supply Chain. Manag. 2021, 9, 1081–1090. [Google Scholar]
  8. Marolt, M.; Zimmermann, H.-D.; Pucihar, A. Social Media Use and Business Performance in SMEs: The Mediating Roles of Relational Social Commerce Capability and Competitive Advantage. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Huang, K.-F.; Dyerson, R.; Wu, L.-Y.; Harindranath, G. From Temporary Competitive Advantage to Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Br. J. Manag. 2015, 26, 617–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Al-Awamleh, H.K.; Alhalalmeh, M.I.; Alatyat, Z.A.; Saraireh, S.; Akour, I.; Alneimat, S.; Alathamneh, F.F.; Abu-Farha, Y.S.; Al-Hawary, S.I.S. The effect of green supply chain on sustainability: Evidence from the pharmaceutical industry. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2022, 10, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Al-Khawaldah, R.A.; Al-Zoubi, W.K.; Alshaer, S.A.; Almarshad, M.N.; Alshalabi, F.S.; Altahrawi, M.H.; Al-Hawary, S.I. Green supply chain management and competitive advantage: The mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2022, 10, 961–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Haseeb, M.; Hussain, H.I.; Kot, S.; Androniceanu, A.; Jermsittiparsert, K. Role of Social and Technological Challenges in Achievinga Sustainable Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Business Performance. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kubina, M.; Lendel, V. Successful Application of Social CRM in The Company. Procedia Econ. Financ. 2015, 23, 1190–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Wynn, M.; Turner, P.; Banik, A.; Duckworth, G. The impact of customer relationship management systems in small business enterprises. Strateg. Chang. 2016, 25, 659–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yawised, K.; Torugsa, N.; O'Donohue, W. Exploring social customer relationship management in Australian small and medium enterprises. Int. J. Glob. Small Bus. 2017, 9, 222–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Diffley, S.; McCole, P.; Carvajal-Trujillo, E. Examining social customer relationship management among Irish hotels. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2018, 30, 1072–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Hassan, S.H.; Haniba, N.M.M.; Ahmad, N.H. Social customer relationship management (s-CRM) among small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia. Int. J. Ethic- Syst. 2019, 35, 284–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kantorová, K.; Bachmann, P. Social Customer Relationship Management and Organizational Characteristics. Information 2018, 9, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Pohludka, M.; Štverková, H. The Best Practice of CRM Implementation for Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises. Adm. Sci. 2019, 9, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Al-Hawary, S.I.S.; Obiadat, A.A. Does mobile marketing affect customer loyalty in Jordan? Int. J. Bus. Excell. 2021, 23, 226–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Al-Hawary, S.I.S.; Al-Rasheedy, H.H. The effect of strategic learning for human resources on dynamic capabilities of airlines companies in Kuwait. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 2021, 37, 421–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Marolt, M.; Pucihar, A.; Zimmermann, H.-D. Social CRM Adoption and its Impact on Performance Outcomes: A Literature Review. Orga 2015, 48, 260–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Charoensukmongkol, P.; Sasatanun, P. Social media use for CRM and business performance satisfaction: The moderating roles of social skills and social media sales intensity. Asia Pac. Manag. Rev. 2017, 22, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kamboj, S.; Yadav, M.; Rahman, Z. Impact of social media and customer-centric technology on performance outcomes: The mediating role of social CRM capabilities. Int. J. Electron. Mark. Retail. 2018, 9, 109–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Foltean, F.S.; Trif, S.M.; Tuleu, D.L. Customer relationship management capabilities and social media technology use: Consequences on firm performance. J. Bus. Res. 2018, 104, 563–575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. AlQershi, N.; Ismail, A.I.; Abualrejal, H.; Salahudin, S.N. Competitive advantage achievement through customer relationship management dimensions. J. Distrib. Sci. 2020, 18, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hanaysha, J.R.; Al-Shaikh, M.E.; Kumar, P. An Examination of Customer Relationship Management and Business Sustainability in Small and Medium Enterprises. Int. J. Cust. Relatsh. Mark. Manag. 2022, 13, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Almohaimmeed, B. The impact of analytical CRM on strategic CRM, operational CRM and customer satisfaction: Empirical study on commercial banks. Uncertain Supply Chain Manag. 2021, 9, 711–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mang’Unyi, E.E.; Khabala, O.T.; Govender, K.K. The relationship between e-CRM and customer loyalty: A Kenyan Commercial Bank case study. Banks Bank Syst. 2017, 12, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Aldaihani, F.M.F.; Ali, N.A.B. Impact of social customer relationship management on customer satisfaction through customer empowerment: A study of Islamic Banks in Kuwait. Int. Res. J. Financ. Econ. 2018, 170, 41–53. [Google Scholar]
  31. Teece, D.J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat. Manag. J. 2007, 28, 1319–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Abbas, J.; Raza, S.; Nurunnabi, M.; Minai, M.S.; Bano, S. The Impact of Entrepreneurial Business Networks on Firms’ Performance Through a Mediating Role of Dynamic Capabilities. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Čirjevskis, A. The role of dynamic capabilities as drivers of business model innovation in mergers and acquisitions of technology-advanced firms. J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex. 2019, 5, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Cui, Y.; Jiao, H. Dynamic capabilities, strategic stakeholder alliances and sustainable competitive advantage: Evidence fromChina. Corp. Gov. Int. J. Bus. Soc. 2011, 11, 386–398. [Google Scholar]
  35. Ojelabi, R.; Oyeyipo, O.; Afolabi, A.; Amusan, L. Presence of Social Client Relationship Management within the Nigerian Construction Industry. Buildings 2018, 8, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tiwari, A.; Misra, M. Analysis of operative factors and practices in social CRM. Int. J. Digit. Enterp. Technol. 2018, 1, 135–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Aldaihani, F.M.F.; Bin-Ali, N.A.; Hashim, H.B.; Basha, N.K. The impact of social customer relationship management on customer loyalty of Islamic banks in Kuwait: Customer empowerment as a mediating Variable. GIS Bus. 2018, 15, 160–174. [Google Scholar]
  38. Cavaliere, L.P.L.; Khan, R.; Sundram, S.; Jainani, K.; Bagale, G.; Chakravarthi, K.; Regin, R.; Rajest, S.S. The Impact of customer relationship management on customer satisfaction and retention: The mediation of service quality. Turk. J. Physiother. Rehabil. 2021, 32, 22107–22121. [Google Scholar]
  39. Chatterjee, S.; Chaudhuri, R.; Vrontis, D.; Thrassou, A.; Ghosh, S.K.; Chaudhuri, S. Social customer relationship management factors and business benefits. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 2020, 29, 35–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Al-Hudhaif, S.A. The critical success factors for implementation of customer relationship management in the banking sector of Saudi Arabia. J. Glob. Bus. Manag. 2011, 7, 7–13. [Google Scholar]
  41. Al-Rashed, S.A. Exploring the success factors of customer relationship management (CRM) systems in the telecommunication sector in Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 2018, 8, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Al-Rashed, S.; Almakki, R. Model for implementing successful customer relationship management in Saudi telecom industry. Int. J. Bus. Inf. Syst. 2018, 7, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Talet, A.; Shawosh, M.; Al-Saeed, S. The Perception of Customer Relationship Management Adoption: Case of Mobile Companies in Saudi Arabia. J. Mob. Technol. Knolwedge Soc. 2011, 2011, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Alsharari, Y.S.; Fadzil Shah, A.; CheAzlan, T.; RushamiZien, Y. The association between communication, customer relationship management and organisational performance: Evidence from the Saudi Arabia hospitals. J. Manag. Res. 2017, 9, 57–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Alqahtani, F.A.; Saba, T. Social customer relation management for tourism in Saudi Arabia: A Case study. Life Sci. J. 2014, 11, 143–160. [Google Scholar]
  46. Mabkhot, H.; Isa, N.M.; Mabkhot, A. The Influence of the Credibility of Social Media Influencers SMIs on the Consumers’ Purchase Intentions: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Saleh, M.A.H. Social networks and customer relationship development at the Saudi telecommunication service providers. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2016, 8, 77–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Laaksonen, O.; Peltoniemi, M. The essence of dynamic capabilities and their measurement. Int. J. Manag. Rev. 2018, 20, 184–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Al-Hawary, S.I.; Al-Syasneh, M.S. Impact of dynamic strategic capabilities on strategic entrepreneurship in presence of outsourcing of five stars hotels in Jordan. Bus. Theory Pract. 2020, 21, 578–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. AlTaweel, I.R.; Al-Hawary, S.I. The Mediating Role of Innovation Capability on the Relationship between Strategic Agility and Organizational Performance. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Al-Hawary, S.I.S.; Mohammad, A.S.; Al-Syasneh, M.S.; Qandah, M.S.F.; Alhajri, T.M.S. Organisational learning capabilities of the commercial banks in Jordan: Do electronic human resources management practices matter? Int. J. Learn. Intellect. Cap. 2020, 17, 242–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Teece, D.J.; Pisano, G.; Shuen, A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg. Manag. J. 1997, 18, 509–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Helfat, C.E.; Peteraf, M.A. Understanding dynamic capabilities: Progress along a developmental path. Strat. Organ. 2009, 7, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Amui, L.B.L.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L.; Kannan, D. Sustainability as a dynamic organizational capability: A systematic review and a future agenda toward a sustainable transition. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 308–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liboni, L.B.; Cezarino, L.O.; Alves, M.F.R.; Jabbour, C.J.C.; Venkatesh, V.G. Translating the environmental orientation of firms into sustainable outcomes: The role of sustainable dynamic capability. Rev. Manag. Sci. 2022, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Leonidou, L.C.; Leonidou, C.N.; Fotiadis, T.A.; Aykol, B. Dynamic capabilities driving an eco-based advantage and performance in global hotel chains: The moderating effect of international strategy. Tour. Manag. 2015, 50, 268–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Na, Y.K.; Kang, S.; Jeong, H.Y. The Effect of Market Orientation on Performance of Sharing Economy Business: Focusing on Marketing Innovation and Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Sustainability 2019, 11, 729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Ge, B.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, D.; Gao, Y.; Du, X.; Zhou, T. An Empirical Study on Green Innovation Strategy and Sustainable Competitive Advantages: Path and Boundary. Sustainability 2018, 10, 3631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Elidemir, N.S.; Ozturen, A.; Bayighomog, S.W. Innovative behaviors, employee creativity, and sustainable competitive advantage: A moderated mediation. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Hamadamin, H.H.; Atan, T. The impact of strategic human resource management practices on competitive advantage sustainability: The mediation of human capital development and employee commitment. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Battour, M.; Barahma, M.; Al-Awlaqi, M. The Relationship between HRM Strategies and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Testing the Mediating Role of Strategic Agility. Sustainability 2021, 13, 5315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Feng, B.; Sun, K.; Chen, M.; Gao, T. The Impact of Core Technological Capabilities of High-Tech Industry on Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Zhang, Z.; Shang, Y.; Cheng, L.; Hu, A. Big Data Capability and Sustainable Competitive Advantage: The Mediating Role of Ambidextrous Innovation Strategy. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Mustikowati, R.I.; Sarwoko, E.; Arief, M.; Nurfarida, I.N. Marketing Investigation: Customer Relationship Management and Innovation to Improve Competitive Advantage and Business Performance. Human. Soc. Sci. Lett. 2021, 9, 430–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ofori, D.; Appiah-Nimo, C. Relationship Management, Competitive Advantage and Performance of Hotels: A Resource-Based View. J. Afr. Bus. 2021, 23, 712–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Vătămănescu, E.M.; Gorgos, E.A.; Ghigiu, A.M.; Pătruț, M. Bridging intellectual capital and SMEs internationalization through the lens of sustainable competitive advantage: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 2510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Armstrong, C.E.; Shimizu, K. A Review of Approaches to Empirical Research on the Resource-Based View of the Firm†. J. Manag. 2007, 33, 959–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Rodrigues, M.; Franco, M.; Silva, R.; Oliveira, C. Success factors of SMEs: Empirical study guided by dynamic capabilities and resources-based view. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Teece, D.J. Dynamic capabilities as (workable) management systems theory. J. Manag. Organ. 2018, 24, 359–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Abalala, T.S.; Islam, M.M.; Alam, M.M. Impact of ethical practices on small and medium enterprises’ performance in Saudi Arabia: An Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling analysis. S. Afr. J. Bus. Manag. 2021, 52, a2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Adam, N.A.; Alarifi, G. Innovation practices for survival of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the COVID-19 times: The role of external support. J. Innov. Entrep. 2021, 10, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Saleh, M.H.M.; Azmin, A.A.; Saraih, U.N. Effect of marketing ethics as a moderate on the relationship between market orientation and SME performance: Evidence from Saudi Arabia. Int. J. Entrep. Manag. Pract. 2021, 4, 13–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hair, J.F.; Hult, T.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), 3rd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  74. Hair, J.F.; Ringle, C.M.; Sarstedt, M. PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2011, 19, 139–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mukhlis, H.; Al-Hawary, S.I.S.; Linh, H.V.; Hani, I.R.; Adnan, S. Religious capital and job engagement among Malaysian Muslim nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. HTS Teol. Stud. Theol. Stud. 2022, 78, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Gallego-Gomez, C.; De-Pablos-Heredero, C.; Montes-Botella, J.L. The impact of customer relationship management systems on dynamic capabilities at firms: An application to the banking industry. J. Glob. Inf. Manag. 2021, 29, 103–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sustainability 15 01952 g001 550
Figure 1. Research conceptual model. s-CRM: social customer relationship management, SDCs: sustainable dynamic capabilities, SCA: sustainable competitive advantage.
Figure 1. Research conceptual model. s-CRM: social customer relationship management, SDCs: sustainable dynamic capabilities, SCA: sustainable competitive advantage.
Sustainability 15 01952 g001
Sustainability 15 01952 g002 550
Figure 2. Research structural model.
Figure 2. Research structural model.
Sustainability 15 01952 g002
Table
Table 1. Results of validity and reliability.
Table 1. Results of validity and reliability.
VariablesItemsConvergent ValidityDiscriminant Validity (HTMT)Reliability
FLAVEs-CRMSDCsSCAαCR
s-CRMSCRM10.8860.675- 0.900.93
SCRM20.862
SCRM30.800
SCRM40.813
SCRM50.784
SCRM60.778
SDCsSDC10.8670.7940.274- 0.910.94
SDC20.890
SDC30.900
SDC40.905
SCASCA10.8780.6820.3020.300-0.890.91
SCA20.866
SCA30.698
SCA40.841
SCA50.834
Table
Table 2. Results of structural model fit.
Table 2. Results of structural model fit.
CriteriaSRMRd_ULSd_GNFI
Recommended value Less than 0.10Higher than 0.05Higher than 0.05Higher than 0.80
Estimated value0.0700.5950.3810.789
Table
Table 3. Results of hypotheses testing.
Table 3. Results of hypotheses testing.
Research Hypothesesf SquareDirect EffectsIndirect EffectsConfidence Intervals
βpβp2.5%97.5%
H1s-CRM→SCA 0.0540.2240.003--0.0580.398
H2s-CRM→SDCs 0.0690.2540.004--0.0870.435
H3SDCs→SCA 0.0590.2340.006--0.0790.384
H4s-CRM→SDCs→SCA---0.0590.0400.0120.117
R-square (SCA) = 0.131, R-square (SDCs) = 0.065.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alenazi, S.A.; Alanazi, T.M. The Mediating Role of Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities in the Effect of Social Customer Relationship Management on Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Study on SMEs in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability 2023, 15, 1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031952

AMA Style

Alenazi SA, Alanazi TM. The Mediating Role of Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities in the Effect of Social Customer Relationship Management on Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Study on SMEs in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability. 2023; 15(3):1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031952

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alenazi, Sultan Alaswad, and Tawfeeq Mohammed Alanazi. 2023. "The Mediating Role of Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities in the Effect of Social Customer Relationship Management on Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Study on SMEs in Saudi Arabia" Sustainability 15, no. 3: 1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031952

APA Style

Alenazi, S. A., & Alanazi, T. M. (2023). The Mediating Role of Sustainable Dynamic Capabilities in the Effect of Social Customer Relationship Management on Sustainable Competitive Advantage: A Study on SMEs in Saudi Arabia. Sustainability, 15(3), 1952. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15031952

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop