How Is Job Performance Affected by Ergonomics in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry? Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Talent Retention
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review and Hypotheses Development
2.1. Ergonomics
2.2. Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) Model
2.3. Tourism and Hospitality Industry
2.4. The Relationship between Ergonomics and Job Performance
2.5. The Relationship between Ergonomics and Work Engagement
2.6. The Relationship between Work Engagement and Job Performance
2.7. The Mediating Role of Work Engagement in the Link between Ergonomics and Job Performance
2.8. The Relationship between Ergonomics and Talent Retention
2.9. The Relationship between Talent Retention and Job Performance
2.10. The Mediating Role of Talent Retention in the Link between Ergonomics and Job Performance
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Measures and Instrument Development
3.2. Sampling and Data Collection
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Participants’ Profile
4.2. Descriptive Statistics and Factor Loadings
4.3. Reliability and Validity
4.4. Model Fit and Quality Indices for the Research Model
4.5. The Structural Model and Hypotheses Testing
5. Discussion
6. Implications
6.1. Theoretical Implications
6.2. Practical Implications
7. Limitations and Future Research
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Ergonomics-Related Job Factors Coluci et al. (2009) [142] |
Ergo.1. Performing the same task over and over. |
Ergo.2. Working very fast for short periods (lifting, grasping, pulling, etc.). |
Ergo.3. Having to handle or grasp small objects. |
Ergo.4. Insufficient breaks or pauses during the workday. |
Ergo.5. Working in awkward or cramped positions. |
Ergo.6. Working in the same position for long periods (standing, bent over, sitting, kneeling, etc.). |
Ergo.7. Bending or twisting your back awkwardly. |
Ergo.8. Reaching or working over your head or away from your body. |
Ergo.9. Hot, cold, humid, wet conditions. |
Ergo.10. Carrying, lifting, or moving heavy materials or equipment. |
Ergo.11. Continuing to work when injured or hurt. |
Ergo.12. Work scheduling (overtime, length of workday). |
Ergo.13. Using tools (design, weight, vibration, etc.). |
Ergo.14. Working without any type of training. |
Employee Job Performance Kundu et al. (2019) [143] |
EJP.1. I make sure that my work meets/exceeds performance standards. |
EJP.2. I meet/exceed my goals. |
EJP.3. I complete my tasks on time. |
EJP.4. I respond quickly when problems come up. |
Work engagement Saks (2006) [144] |
WE.1. I really “throw” myself into my work. |
WE.2. Sometimes I am so into my work that I lose track of time. |
WE.3. This work is all-consuming; I am totally into it. |
WE.4. My mind often wanders and I think of other things when doing my work (R). |
WE.5. I am highly engaged in this work. |
Talent retention Mujtaba et al. (2022) [145] |
TR.1. My hotel/travel agency provides career development opportunities to retain key employees. |
TR.2. Managerial support of the hotel/travel agency inspires me to continue my job. |
TR.3. The conducive environment of my hotel/travel agency motivates talented employees to stay a longer period. |
TR.4. Attractive compensation and benefit incentives engage me to work with my hotel/travel agency. |
TR.5. My hotel/travel agency provides more avenues to high performers for work–life balance |
TR.6. My hotel/travel agency applies a performance-based rewards and recognition policy to motivate high performers to remain in the organization. |
R: Reverse scoring |
Appendix B. Model Fit and Quality Indices
Assessment | Criterion | Supported/Rejected | |
Average path coefficient (APC) | 0.464, p < 0.001 | p < 0.05 | Supported |
Average R-squared (ARS) | 0.567, p < 0.001 | p < 0.05 | Supported |
Average adjusted R-squared (AARS) | 0.565, p < 0.001 | p < 0.05 | Supported |
Average block VIF (AVIF) | 2.985 | acceptable if ≤5, ideally ≤3.3 | Supported |
Average full collinearity VIF (AFVIF) | 2.292 | acceptable if ≤5, ideally ≤3.3 | Supported |
Tenenhaus GoF (GoF) | 0.598 | small ≥0.1, medium ≥0.25, large ≥0.36 | Supported |
Sympson’s paradox ratio (SPR) | 1.000 | acceptable if ≥0.7, ideally = 1 | Supported |
R-squared contribution ratio (RSCR) | 1.000 | acceptable if ≥0.9, ideally = 1 | Supported |
Statistical suppression ratio (SSR) | 1.000 | acceptable if ≥0.7 | Supported |
Nonlinear bivariate causality direction ratio (NLBCDR) | 1.000 | acceptable if ≥0.7 | Supported |
References
- Al-Romeedy, B.S.; Mohamed, A.A. Does Strategic Renewal Affect the Organizational Reputation of Travel Agents through Organizational Identification? Int. J. Tour. Hosp. Manag. 2022, 5, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reiman, A.; Kaivo-oja, J.; Parviainen, E.; Takala, E.-P.; Lauraeus, T. Human factors and ergonomics in manufacturing in the industry 4.0 context–A scoping review. Technol. Soc. 2021, 65, 101572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Salmon, P.M.; Stevens, N.; McLean, S.; Hulme, A.; Read, G.J. Human Factors and Ergonomics and the management of existential threats: A work domain analysis of a COVID-19 return from lockdown restrictions system. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 2021, 31, 412–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sever, M.M. Improving ergonomic conditions at hospitality industry. Int. J. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2019, 8, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beckel, J.L.; Fisher, G.G. Telework and worker health and well-being: A review and recommendations for research and practice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 3879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fraboni, F.; Brendel, H.; Pietrantoni, L. Evaluating Organizational Guidelines for Enhancing Psychological Well-Being, Safety, and Performance in Technology Integration. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kroemer, A.D.; Kroemer, K.H. Office Ergonomics: Ease and Efficiency at Work; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Norton, T.A.; Ayoko, O.B.; Ashkanasy, N.M. A Socio-Technical Perspective on the Application of Green Ergonomics to Open-Plan Offices: A Review of the Literature and Recommendations for Future Research. Sustainability 2021, 13, 8236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Afroz, S.; Haque, M.I. Ergonomics in the workplace for a better quality of work life. In Ergonomics for Improved Productivity: Proceedings of HWWE 2017; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 503–511. [Google Scholar]
- Dandale, C.; Telang, P.A.; Kasatwar, P. The Effectiveness of Ergonomic Training and Therapeutic Exercise in Chronic Neck Pain in Accountants in the Healthcare System: A Review. Cureus 2023, 15, e35762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Srivastava, P.; Khan, M. Musculoskeletal disorders among the Bone Carving Artisans of Uttar Pradesh: A study on Cognitive space and accessory design for MSD and health-related problems. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 64, 1465–1474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ebenso, B.; Mbachu, C.; Etiaba, E.; Huss, R.; Manzano, A.; Onwujekwe, O.; Uzochukwu, B.; Ezumah, N.; Ensor, T.; Hicks, J.P. Which mechanisms explain the motivation of primary health workers? Insights from the realist evaluation of a maternal and child health programme in Nigeria. BMJ Glob. Health 2020, 5, e002408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lin, S.; Döngül, E.S.; Uygun, S.V.; Öztürk, M.B.; Huy, D.T.N.; Tuan, P.V. Exploring the relationship between abusive management, self-efficacy and organizational performance in the context of human–machine interaction technology and artificial intelligence with the effect of ergonomics. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kalakoski, V.; Selinheimo, S.; Valtonen, T.; Turunen, J.; Käpykangas, S.; Ylisassi, H.; Toivio, P.; Järnefelt, H.; Hannonen, H.; Paajanen, T. Effects of a cognitive ergonomics workplace intervention (CogErg) on cognitive strain and well-being: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. A study protocol. BMC Psychol. 2020, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Azizi, A.; Ghafoorpoor Yazdi, P.; Hashemipour, M. Interactive design of storage unit utilizing virtual reality and ergonomic framework for production optimization in manufacturing industry. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 2019, 13, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatia, S.; Arora, A. A Study on Effect of Job Design and Ergonomics on Employee Performance in Indian Automotive Sector. Metamorphosis 2021, 20, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ohunakin, F.; Adeniji, A.A.; Ogunlusi, G.; Igbadumhe, F.; Sodeinde, A.G. Talent retention strategies and employees’ behavioural outcomes: Empirical evidence from hospitality industry. Bus. Theory Pract. 2020, 21, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naqshbandi, M.M.; Kabir, I.; Ishak, N.A.; Islam, M.Z. The future of work: Work engagement and job performance in the hybrid workplace. Learn. Organ. 2023; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kleine, A.K.; Rudolph, C.W.; Zacher, H. Thriving at work: A meta-analysis. J. Organ. Behav. 2019, 40, 973–999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKenzie, F.H. Attracting and retaining skilled and professional staff in remote locations of Australia. Rangel. J. 2011, 33, 353–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nzewi, H.N.; Augustine, A.; Mohammed, I.; Godson, O. Physical work environment and employee performance in selected brewing firms in Anambra State, Nigeria. J. Good Gov. Sustain. Dev. Afr. 2018, 4, 131–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhatia, N.; Sharma, S.K.; Ganguly, C. Compensation and Reward Management within Domestic & International Airlines. KEPES 2023, 21, 190–202. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, X.; Al Mamun, A.; Hoque, M.E.; Hussain, W.M.H.W.; Yang, Q. Work design, employee well-being, and retention intention: A case study of China’s young workforce. Heliyon 2023, 9, e15742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Christy, D.V. Ergonomics and Employee Engagement. Int. J. Mech. Eng. 2019, 10, 105–109. [Google Scholar]
- Hoffmeister, K.; Gibbons, A.; Schwatka, N.; Rosecrance, J. Ergonomics Climate Assessment: A measure of operational performance and employee well-being. Appl. Ergon. 2015, 50, 160–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pheasant, S.; Haslegrave, C.M. Bodyspace: Anthropometry, Ergonomics and the Design of Work; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, X.; Houssin, R.; Renaud, J.; Gardoni, M. A review of methodologies for integrating human factors and ergonomics in engineering design. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 4961–4976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thatcher, A.; Zink, K.J.; Fischer, K. Human Factors for Sustainability: Theoretical Perspectives and Global Applications; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Gualtieri, L.; Palomba, I.; Merati, F.A.; Rauch, E.; Vidoni, R. Design of human-centered collaborative assembly workstations for the improvement of operators’ physical ergonomics and production efficiency: A case study. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kistan, T.; Gardi, A.; Sabatini, R. Machine learning and cognitive ergonomics in air traffic management: Recent developments and considerations for certification. Aerospace 2018, 5, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnsen, S.O.; Kilskar, S.S.; Fossum, K.R. Missing focus on Human Factors–organizational and cognitive ergonomics–in the safety management for the petroleum industry. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part O J. Risk Reliab. 2017, 231, 400–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bednárová-Gibová, K. Organizational ergonomics of translation as a powerful predictor of translators’ happiness at work? Perspectives 2021, 29, 391–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lesener, T.; Gusy, B.; Wolter, C. The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work Stress 2019, 33, 76–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Radic, A.; Arjona-Fuentes, J.M.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Han, H.; Law, R. Job demands–job resources (JD-R) model, work engagement, and well-being of cruise ship employees. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2020, 88, 102518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Tuckey, M.R.; Bakker, A.; Chen, P.Y.; Dollard, M.F. Linking objective and subjective job demands and resources in the JD-R model: A multilevel design. Work Stress 2023, 37, 27–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wollter Bergman, M.; Berlin, C.; Babapour Chafi, M.; Falck, A.-C.; Örtengren, R. Cognitive Ergonomics of Assembly Work from a Job Demands–Resources Perspective: Three Qualitative Case Studies. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Borst, R.T.; Kruyen, P.M.; Lako, C.J. Exploring the job demands–resources model of work engagement in government: Bringing in a psychological perspective. Rev. Public Pers. Adm. 2019, 39, 372–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaleem, M. The influence of talent management on performance of employee in public sector institutions of the UAE. Public Adm. Res. 2019, 8, 8–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Van Zyl, L.E. A critical reflection on the psychology of retention-Psychology of Retention: Theory, Research and Practice, by Melinde Coetzee, Ingrid L. Potgieter and Nadia Ferreira (Eds.). SA J. Ind. Psychol. 2019, 45, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Kwon, K.; Park, J. The life cycle of employee engagement theory in HRD research. Adv. Dev. Hum. Resour. 2019, 21, 352–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peifer, C.; Engeser, S. Advances in Flow Research; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Khairy, H.A.; Lee, Y.M. ENHANCING CUSTOMERS’BRAND COMMITMENT: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL PERSPECTIVE OF BRAND CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR IN EGYPTIAN HOTELS. Int. J. Recent Trends Bus. Tour. (IJRTBT) 2018, 2, 27–38. [Google Scholar]
- Attallah, N.F. Evaluation of perceived service quality provided by tourism establishments in Egypt. Tour. Hosp. Res. 2015, 15, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sherehiy, B.; Karwowski, W. The relationship between work organization and workforce agility in small manufacturing enterprises. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2014, 44, 466–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richardson, M.; Maspero, M.; Golightly, D.; Sheffield, D.; Staples, V.; Lumber, R. Nature: A new paradigm for well-being and ergonomics. In New Paradigms in Ergonomics; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 142–155. [Google Scholar]
- Faez, E.; Zakerian, S.A.; Azam, K.; Hancock, K.; Rosecrance, J. An assessment of ergonomics climate and its association with self-reported pain, organizational performance and employee well-being. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sotirios, P.; Fabio, F.; Francesco, M. A Methodological Framework to Assess Mental Fatigue in Assembly Lines with a Collaborative Robot. In International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; pp. 297–306. [Google Scholar]
- Kazemi, R.; Smith, A. Overcoming COVID-19 pandemic: Emerging challenges of human factors and the role of cognitive ergonomics. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 2023, 24, 401–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ishola, B. Handling waste in manufacturing: Encouraging re-manufacturing, recycling and re-using in United States of America. Procedia Manuf. 2019, 39, 721–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Li, D.; Wu, Z.; Bai, R.; Meng, G. Ergonomic and efficiency analysis of conventional apple harvest process. Int. J. Agric. Biol. Eng. 2019, 12, 210–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chintada, A.; V, U. Improvement of productivity by implementing occupational ergonomics. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 2022, 39, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, P.R.; Hurtado, A.L.B.; Batiz, E.C. Ergonomics management with a proactive focus. Procedia Manuf. 2015, 3, 4509–4516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Selamat, M.N.; Mukapit, M. The relationship between task factors and occupational safety and health (OSH) performance in the printing industry. Akademika 2018, 88, 65–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robertson, M.M.; Huang, Y.-H.; O’Neill, M.J.; Schleifer, L.M. Flexible workspace design and ergonomics training: Impacts on the psychosocial work environment, musculoskeletal health, and work effectiveness among knowledge workers. Appl. Ergon. 2008, 39, 482–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Antony, M.R. Paradigm shift in employee engagement–A critical analysis on the drivers of employee engagement. Int. J. Inf. Bus. Manag. 2018, 10, 32–46. [Google Scholar]
- Xiao, Y.; Becerik-Gerber, B.; Lucas, G.; Roll, S.C. Impacts of working from home during COVID-19 pandemic on physical and mental well-being of office workstation users. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2021, 63, 181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Omar, M.K.; Dahalan, N.A.; Mohammed, I.H.; Shah, M.M.; Azman, N.N.M. Supervisor Feedback, Ergonomics and Job Performance: A Study at One of Malaysia’s Frontline Government Agency. Int. J. Econ. Financ. Issues 2016, 6, 71–75. [Google Scholar]
- Eldor, L.; Vigoda-Gadot, E. The nature of employee engagement: Rethinking the employee–organization relationship. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2017, 28, 526–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chanana, N.; Sangeeta. Employee engagement practices during COVID-19 lockdown. J. Public Aff. 2021, 21, e2508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lallemand, C. Contributions of participatory ergonomics to the improvement of safety culture in an industrial context. Work 2012, 41, 3284–3290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kadir, B.A.; Broberg, O. Human well-being and system performance in the transition to industry 4.0. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2020, 76, 102936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bayraktar, C.A.; Araci, O.; Karacay, G.; Calisir, F. The mediating effect of rewarding on the relationship between employee involvement and job satisfaction. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 2017, 27, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voordt, T.v.d.; Jensen, P.A. The impact of healthy workplaces on employee satisfaction, productivity and costs. J. Corp. Real Estate 2023, 25, 29–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ijaz, M.M.; Tarar, A.H. Work Autonomy, Organizational Climate and Employee Engagement. Pak. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 2020, 18, 43–55. [Google Scholar]
- Vischer, J.C. The concept of workplace performance and its value to managers. Calif. Manag. Rev. 2007, 49, 62–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chandrasekar, K. Workplace environment and its impact on organisational performance in public sector organisations. Int. J. Enterp. Comput. Bus. Syst. 2011, 1, 1–19. [Google Scholar]
- Adum, A.N.; Ebeze, U.V.; Ekwugha, U.P.; Okika, C.C. Opinion Poll on Nigerian University Students Awareness of the health Implications of Inadequate Ergonomic furniture in Universities of South-East Nigeria. Commun. Panor. Afr. Glob. Perspect. 2016, 2, 1–49. [Google Scholar]
- Alrashed, W.A. Ergonomics and work-related musculoskeletal disorders in ophthalmic practice. Imam J. Appl. Sci. 2016, 1, 48–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bell, J.S.L.; Raj, S.S. Role of leaders for boosting morale of employees in IT sector with special reference to Technopark, Trivandrum. Int. J. Manag. Res. Rev. 2016, 6, 1155. [Google Scholar]
- Straus, E.; Uhlig, L.; Kühnel, J.; Korunka, C. Remote workers’ well-being, perceived productivity, and engagement: Which resources should HRM improve during COVID-19? A longitudinal diary study. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2023, 34, 2960–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uddin, M.A.; Mahmood, M.; Fan, L. Why individual employee engagement matters for team performance? Mediating effects of employee commitment and organizational citizenship behaviour. Team Perform. Manag. Int. J. 2019, 25, 47–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Neirotti, P. Work intensification and employee involvement in lean production: New light on a classic dilemma. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020, 31, 1958–1983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Innocenti, L.; Profili, S.; Sammarra, A. Engaging chronically ill employees at work: The relationship between bundles of HR practices, perceived illness discrimination and work engagement. Empl. Relat. Int. J. 2023; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kulkarni, P.; Appasaba, L.; Nishchitha, G.C. The influence of COVID-19 on employee ergonomics and employee engagement of banking employees. Manag. Matters 2022, 19, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarwar, H.; Ishaq, M.I.; Amin, A.; Ahmed, R. Ethical leadership, work engagement, employees’ well-being, and performance: A cross-cultural comparison. J. Sustain. Tour. 2020, 28, 2008–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kanten, S.; Sadullah, O. An empirical research on relationship quality of work life and work engagement. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 62, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kotze, M. How job resources and personal resources influence work engagement and burnout. Afr. J. Econ. Manag. Stud. 2018, 9, 148–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bedarkar, M.; Pandita, D. A study on the drivers of employee engagement impacting employee performance. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2014, 133, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Costa, P.L.; Passos, A.M.; Bakker, A.B. Team work engagement: A model of emergence. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2014, 87, 414–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, D.; Jiang, K.; Shalley, C.E.; Keem, S.; Zhou, J. Motivational mechanisms of employee creativity: A meta-analytic examination and theoretical extension of the creativity literature. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2016, 137, 236–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cajander, Å.; Larusdottir, M.; Hedström, G. The effects of automation of a patient-centric service in primary care on the work engagement and exhaustion of nurses. Qual. User Exp. 2020, 5, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonnentag, S.; Tian, A.W.; Cao, J.; Grushina, S.V. Positive work reflection during the evening and next-day work engagement: Testing mediating mechanisms and cyclical processes. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 2021, 94, 836–865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Caniëls, M.C.; Semeijn, J.H.; Renders, I.H. Mind the mindset! The interaction of proactive personality, transformational leadership and growth mindset for engagement at work. Career Dev. Int. 2018, 23, 48–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franken, E.; Plimmer, G.; Malinen, S. Paradoxical leadership in public sector organisations: Its role in fostering employee resilience. Aust. J. Public Adm. 2020, 79, 93–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J. Effects of the paradox mindset on work engagement: The mediating role of seeking challenges and individual unlearning. Curr. Psychol. 2023, 42, 2708–2718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bakker, A.B. The social psychology of work engagement: State of the field. Career Dev. Int. 2022, 27, 36–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaiser, J.A. The relationship between leadership style and nurse-to-nurse incivility: Turning the lens inward. J. Nurs. Manag. 2017, 25, 110–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pranitasari, D. The Effect of Managerial Effectiveness, Work Environment, and Team Work on Lecturer’s Work Engagement (Q). Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. (IJITEE) 2019, 8, 2536–2542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Navajas-Romero, V.; Ceular-Villamandos, N.; Pérez-Priego, M.A.; Caridad-López del Río, L. Sustainable human resource management the mediating role between work engagement and teamwork performance. PLoS ONE 2022, 17, e0271134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fletcher, L. Training perceptions, engagement, and performance: Comparing work engagement and personal role engagement. Hum. Resour. Dev. Int. 2016, 19, 4–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sobhani, A.; Wahab, M.; Neumann, P.W. Integrating ergonomics aspects into operations management performance optimization models: A modeling framework. IIE Trans. Occup. Ergon. Hum. Factors 2016, 4, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hargreaves, S.M.; Raposo, A.; Saraiva, A.; Zandonadi, R.P. Vegetarian diet: An overview through the perspective of quality of life domains. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Rodriguez, J.; Walters, K. The importance of training and development in employee performance and evaluation. World Wide J. Multidiscip. Res. Dev. 2017, 3, 206–212. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, W.; Zhou, S.; Zheng, W.; Wu, S. Investigating the relationship between job burnout and job satisfaction among Chinese generalist teachers in rural primary schools: A serial mediation model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 14427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Addimando, L. The effect of positive working conditions on work engagement and teaching classroom practices: A large cross-sectional study in Switzerland. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzenios, N. The Impact of Health Literacy on Employee Productivity: An Empirical Investigation. Empir. Quests Manag. Essences 2019, 3, 21–33. [Google Scholar]
- Ariesta, R. Analyzing Consumer Choices, the Impact of Job Motivation on Employee Performance. PRODUKTIF J. Kepegawai. Dan Organ. 2023, 2, 52–60. [Google Scholar]
- Barnes, D.; Collier, J. Investigating work engagement in the service environment. J. Serv. Mark. 2013, 27, 485–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burawat, P. Examining generational differences in the workplace: Narcissism, work centrality, and the impact on employee engagement and discretionary effort. Ind. Commer. Train. 2023; ahead-of-print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Setiyani, A.; Djumarno, D.; Riyanto, S.; Nawangsari, L. The effect of work environment on flexible working hours, employee engagement and employee motivation. Int. Rev. Manag. Mark. 2019, 9, 112–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Igwe, K.O.; Utebor, J.N. Perceived influences of office ergonomics on the job performance of confidential secretaries in government ministries in Ebonyi state. Niger. J. Bus. Educ. (NIGJBED) 2023, 9, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Charalampous, M.; Grant, C.A.; Tramontano, C.; Michailidis, E. Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 2019, 28, 51–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Albanesi, B.; Piredda, M.; Bravi, M.; Bressi, F.; Gualandi, R.; Marchetti, A.; Facchinetti, G.; Ianni, A.; Cordella, F.; Zollo, L. Interventions to prevent and reduce work-related musculoskeletal injuries and pain among healthcare professionals. A comprehensive systematic review of the literature. J. Saf. Res. 2022, 82, 124–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yousef, D.A. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and attitudes toward organizational change: A study in the local government. Int. J. Public Adm. 2017, 40, 77–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Widana, I.K.; Sumetri, N.W.; Sutapa, I.K.; Suryasa, W. Anthropometric measures for better cardiovascular and musculoskeletal health. Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 2021, 29, 550–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Biswas, S.; Bhatnagar, J. Mediator analysis of employee engagement: Role of perceived organizational support, PO fit, organizational commitment and job satisfaction. Vikalpa 2013, 38, 27–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jaitli, R.; Hua, Y. Measuring sense of belonging among employees working at a corporate campus: Implication for workplace planning and management. J. Corp. Real Estate 2013, 15, 117–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García-Almeida, D.J.; Fernández-Monroy, M.; De Saá-Pérez, P. Dimensions of employee satisfaction as determinants of organizational commitment in the hotel industry. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 2015, 25, 153–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gopinathan, S.; Raman, M. Ergonomic quality, playing a role in ensuring work life balance among Malaysian ICT workers. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 211, 1210–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weale, V.P.; Wells, Y.D.; Oakman, J. Flexible working arrangements in residential aged care: Applying a person–environment fit model. Asia Pac. J. Hum. Resour. 2017, 55, 356–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mescher, S.; Benschop, Y.; Doorewaard, H. Representations of work—Life balance support. Hum. Relat. 2010, 63, 21–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dousin, O.; Collins, N.; Bartram, T.; Stanton, P. The relationship between work-life balance, the need for achievement, and intention to leave: Mixed-method study. J. Adv. Nurs. 2021, 77, 1478–1489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huang, Y.-H.; Lee, J.; McFadden, A.C.; Murphy, L.A.; Robertson, M.M.; Cheung, J.H.; Zohar, D. Beyond safety outcomes: An investigation of the impact of safety climate on job satisfaction, employee engagement and turnover using social exchange theory as the theoretical framework. Appl. Ergon. 2016, 55, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tosi, F.; Tosi, F. Design for Ergonomics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Sigahi, T.F.; Kawasaki, B.C.; Bolis, I.; Morioka, S.N. A systematic review on the impacts of COVID-19 on work: Contributions and a path forward from the perspectives of ergonomics and psychodynamics of work. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 2021, 31, 375–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mey, M.R.; Poisat, P.; Stindt, C. The influence of leadership behaviours on talent retention: An empirical study. SA J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2021, 19, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Škerháková, V.; Korba, P.; Harničárová, M.; Taha, V.A. Talent retention: Analysis of the antecedents of talented employees’ intention to stay in the organizations. Eur. J. Interdiscip. Stud. 2022, 14, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roof, R.A. The association of individual spirituality on employee engagement: The spirit at work. J. Bus. Ethics 2015, 130, 585–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, L.; Lu, A.C.C.; Gursoy, D.; Neale, N.R. Work engagement, job satisfaction, and turnover intentions: A comparison between supervisors and line-level employees. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 2016, 28, 737–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Somech, A.; Bogler, R. The pressure to go above and beyond the call of duty: Understanding the phenomenon of citizenship pressure among teachers. Teach. Teach. Educ. 2019, 83, 178–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ferdiana, S.; Khan, Z.; Ray, S. Investigating the Impact of Career Development, Organizational Commitment, and Organizational Support on Employee Retention. J. Manag. Stud. Dev. 2023, 2, 117–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sorn, M.K.; Fienena, A.R.; Ali, Y.; Rafay, M.; Fu, G. The Effectiveness of Compensation in Maintaining Employee Retention. Open Access Libr. J. 2023, 10, e10394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anitha, J. Determinants of employee engagement and their impact on employee performance. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2014, 63, 308–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghani, B.; Memon, K.R.; Han, H.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Arjona-Fuentes, J.M. Work stress, technological changes, and job insecurity in the retail organization context. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 918065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- AlQudah, N.F.; Adeel Anjum, M.; Naeem, K.; Alqudah, M.M.; Ahmed, A.; Shtnaoui, H. Examining the antecedents of employee retention among Jordanian private Universities: The moderating role of knowledge sharing. Cogent Bus. Manag. 2023, 10, 2208429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Joe, C.; Yoong, P.; Patel, K. Knowledge loss when older experts leave knowledge-intensive organisations. J. Knowl. Manag. 2013, 17, 913–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Darwin, C. Building a learning organization. Knowl. Solut. 2017, 57, 78–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Holston-Okae, B.L.; Mushi, R.J. Employee turnover in the hospitality industry using Herzberg’s two-factor motivation-hygiene theory. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2018, 8, 218–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, Y.; O’Neill, H.; Lee, R.P.; Zhou, N. The impact of innovative culture on individual employees: The moderating role of market information sharing. J. Prod. Innov. Manag. 2013, 30, 1027–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kawar, L.N.; Radovich, P.; Valdez, R.M.; Zuniga, S.; Rondinelli, J. Compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction among multisite multisystem nurses. Nurs. Adm. Q. 2019, 43, 358–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iqbal, S.; Guohao, L.; Akhtar, S. Effects of job organizational culture, benefits, salary on job satisfaction ultimately affecting employee retention. Rev. Public Adm. Manag. 2017, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghani, B.; Zada, M.; Memon, K.R.; Ullah, R.; Khattak, A.; Han, H.; Ariza-Montes, A.; Araya-Castillo, L. Challenges and strategies for employee retention in the hospitality industry: A review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 2885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subramani, M.; Wagle, M.; Ray, G.; Gupta, A. Capability Development through Just-in-Time Access to Knowledge in Document Repositories: A Longitudinal Examination of Technical Problem Solving. MIS Q. 2021, 45, 1287–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Capodaglio, E.M. Participatory ergonomics for the reduction of musculoskeletal exposure of maintenance workers. Int. J. Occup. Saf. Ergon. 2022, 28, 376–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.Y.; Tsai, C.C.; Fu, C.S. The relationships among internal marketing, job satisfaction, relationship marketing, customer orientation, and organizational performance: An empirical study of TFT-LCD companies in Taiwan. Hum. Factors Ergon. Manuf. Serv. Ind. 2013, 23, 436–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jekiel, C.M. Lean Human Resources: Redesigning HR Processes for a Culture of Continuous Improvement; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ruohomäki, V.; Lahtinen, M.; Reijula, K. Salutogenic and user-centred approach for workplace design. Intell. Build. Int. 2015, 7, 184–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kontoghiorghes, C. Linking high performance organizational culture and talent management: Satisfaction/motivation and organizational commitment as mediators. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2016, 27, 1833–1853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akdere, M.; Egan, T. Transformational leadership and human resource development: Linking employee learning, job satisfaction, and organizational performance. Hum. Resour. Dev. Q. 2020, 31, 393–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Al-Kassem, A.H. Significance of Human Resources Training and Development on Organizational Achievement. PalArch’s J. Archaeol. Egypt/Egyptol. 2021, 18, 693–707. [Google Scholar]
- Phillips, J. Strategic Staffing; SAGE Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Coluci, M.Z.; Alexandre, N.M.; Rosecrance, J. Reliability and validity of an ergonomics-related Job Factors Questionnaire. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 2009, 39, 995–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kundu, S.C.; Kumar, S.; Gahlawat, N. Empowering leadership and job performance: Mediating role of psychological empowerment. Manag. Res. Rev. 2019, 42, 605–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saks, A.M. Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. J. Manag. Psychol. 2006, 21, 600–619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mujtaba, M.; Mubarik, M.S.; Soomro, K.A. Measuring talent management: A proposed construct. Empl. Relat. Int. J. 2022, 44, 1192–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abd El Ghani, A.E.R. Digital Management in the Official Tourist Organizations, Case Study: Egyptian Ministry of Tourism. Int. J. Herit. Tour. Hosp. 2018, 12, 426–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cochran, W.G. Sampling Techniques; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1977. [Google Scholar]
- Hair Jr, J.F.; Howard, M.C.; Nitzl, C. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 109, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manley, S.C.; Hair, J.F.; Williams, R.I.; McDowell, W.C. Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox. Int. Entrep. Manag. J. 2021, 17, 1805–1825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunoro, C.M.; Bolis, I.; Sigahi, T.F.; Kawasaki, B.C.; Sznelwar, L.I. Defining the meaning of “sustainable work” from activity-centered ergonomics and psychodynamics of Work’s perspectives. Appl. Ergon. 2020, 89, 103209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, C.J.; Belis, T.T.; Kuo, T.C. Ergonomics-based factors or criteria for the evaluation of sustainable product manufacturing. Sustainability 2019, 11, 4955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Naeini, H.S.; Arabshahi, M. Occupational Health promotion throughout the synergy between ergonomics and sustainable development aspects. J. Health Saf. Work 2019, 9, 113–120. [Google Scholar]
- Thatcher, A.; Nayak, R.; Waterson, P. Human factors and ergonomics systems-based tools for understanding and addressing global problems of the twenty-first century. Ergonomics 2020, 63, 367–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zink, K.J.; Fischer, K. Human factors and ergonomics: Contribution to sustainability and decent work in global supply chains. In Ergonomics and Human Factors for a Sustainable Future: Current Research and Future Possibilities; Palgrave Macmillan: Singapore, 2018; pp. 243–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ip, W.; Gober, J.; Rostykus, W. Ergonomics Return on Investment: Show Me the Money. Prof. Saf. 2016, 61, 48–52. [Google Scholar]
Frequency | Percent | ||
---|---|---|---|
Gender | Male | 314 | 80.7 |
Female | 75 | 19.3 | |
Age | <30 years | 151 | 38.8 |
30: <40 years | 187 | 48.1 | |
40: >50 years | 51 | 13.1 | |
Educational Level | High schools/institute | 63 | 16.2 |
Bachelor | 313 | 80.5 | |
Master/PhD | 13 | 3.3 | |
Work Experience | <2 years | 73 | 18.8 |
2 to 5 years | 78 | 20.1 | |
6 to 10 years | 65 | 16.7 | |
>10 years | 173 | 44.5 | |
Work Organization | Hotels | 266 | 68.4 |
Travel agency | 123 | 31.6 |
Construct | Mean * | Standard Deviation | Item Loading |
---|---|---|---|
Ergonomic (Ergo) | 3.34 | 1.03 | - |
Ergo.1 | 3.16 | 1.35 | 0.573 ** |
Ergo.2 | 3.37 | 1.32 | 0.501 ** |
Ergo.3 | 3.26 | 1.37 | 0.546 ** |
Ergo.4 | 3.27 | 1.32 | 0.806 ** |
Ergo.5 | 3.37 | 1.33 | 0.912 ** |
Ergo.6 | 3.47 | 1.29 | 0.817 ** |
Ergo.7 | 3.37 | 1.26 | 0.910 ** |
Ergo.8 | 3.27 | 1.23 | 0.842 ** |
Ergo.9 | 3.34 | 1.28 | 0.870 ** |
Ergo.10 | 3.38 | 1.33 | 0.903 ** |
Ergo.11 | 3.48 | 1.29 | 0.836 ** |
Ergo.12 | 3.38 | 1.26 | 0.907 ** |
Ergo.13 | 3.28 | 1.24 | 0.840 ** |
Ergo.14 | 3.36 | 1.27 | 0.833 ** |
Job Performance (JP) | 3.16 | 0.96 | - |
JP.1 | 2.92 | 1.14 | 0.766 ** |
JP.2 | 2.97 | 1.43 | 0.666 ** |
JP.3 | 3.53 | 1.20 | 0.831 ** |
JP.4 | 3.21 | 1.31 | 0.748 ** |
Work Engagement (WE) | 3.47 | 0.95 | - |
WE.1 | 3.26 | 1.23 | 0.817 ** |
WE.2 | 3.36 | 1.25 | 0.806 ** |
WE.3 | 3.58 | 1.19 | 0.815 ** |
WE.4 | 3.66 | 1.15 | 0.759 ** |
WE.5 | 3.48 | 1.05 | 0.834 ** |
Talent Retention (TR) | 2.84 | 1.04 | - |
TR.1 | 2.58 | 1.42 | 0.850 ** |
TR.2 | 2.86 | 1.26 | 0.786 ** |
TR.3 | 2.98 | 1.25 | 0.979 ** |
TR.4 | 2.92 | 1.16 | 0.987 ** |
TR.5 | 2.98 | 1.18 | 0.722 ** |
TR.6 | 2.74 | 1.38 | 0.552 ** |
Construct/Items | Composite Reliability | Cronbach alpha | Average Variance Extracted (AVE) | Full Collin.VIF |
---|---|---|---|---|
Ergonomic (Ergo) | 0.961 | 0.955 | 0.636 | 1.727 |
Job Performance (JP) | 0.838 | 0.742 | 0.564 | 2.836 |
Work Engagement (WE) | 0.902 | 0.863 | 0.648 | 2.247 |
Talent Retention (TR) | 0.924 | 0.901 | 0.672 | 2.357 |
Variable | TR | JP | Ergo | WE |
---|---|---|---|---|
Talent Retention (TR) | 0.820 | 0.731 | 0.559 | 0.636 |
Job Performance (JP) | 0.731 | 0.751 | 0.595 | 0.706 |
Ergonomic (Ergo) | 0.559 | 0.595 | 0.798 | 0.578 |
Work Engagement (WE) | 0.636 | 0.706 | 0.578 | 0.805 |
HTMT Ratios | TR | JP | Ergo | WE |
---|---|---|---|---|
Talent Retention (TR) | ||||
Job Performance (JP) | 0.897 | |||
Ergonomic (Ergo) | 0.605 | 0.710 | ||
Work Engagement (WE) | 0.723 | 0.881 | 0.638 |
No. | Path a | Path b | Indirect Effect | SE | t-Value | Bootstrapped Confidence Interval | Decision | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
95% LL | 95% UL | |||||||
H4 | 0.740 | 0.330 | 0.244 | 0.034 | 7.182 | 0.178 | 0.311 | Mediation |
H7 | 0.720 | 0.420 | 0.302 | 0.034 | 8.894 | 0.236 | 0.369 | Mediation |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
El-Sherbeeny, A.M.; Al-Romeedy, B.S.; Abd elhady, M.H.; Sheikhelsouk, S.; Alsetoohy, O.; Liu, S.; Khairy, H.A. How Is Job Performance Affected by Ergonomics in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry? Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Talent Retention. Sustainability 2023, 15, 14947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014947
El-Sherbeeny AM, Al-Romeedy BS, Abd elhady MH, Sheikhelsouk S, Alsetoohy O, Liu S, Khairy HA. How Is Job Performance Affected by Ergonomics in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry? Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Talent Retention. Sustainability. 2023; 15(20):14947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014947
Chicago/Turabian StyleEl-Sherbeeny, Ahmed M., Bassam Samir Al-Romeedy, Mohamed Hani Abd elhady, Samar Sheikhelsouk, Omar Alsetoohy, Sijun Liu, and Hazem Ahmed Khairy. 2023. "How Is Job Performance Affected by Ergonomics in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry? Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Talent Retention" Sustainability 15, no. 20: 14947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014947
APA StyleEl-Sherbeeny, A. M., Al-Romeedy, B. S., Abd elhady, M. H., Sheikhelsouk, S., Alsetoohy, O., Liu, S., & Khairy, H. A. (2023). How Is Job Performance Affected by Ergonomics in the Tourism and Hospitality Industry? Mediating Roles of Work Engagement and Talent Retention. Sustainability, 15(20), 14947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014947