Integrating Mobile Technologies: Two Stage Study on Academic Performance and Social Presence
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- What are the effects of Duolingo-based activities on students’ academic performance in English classes?
- What are the effects of Duolingo-based activities on students’ social presence in English classes?
- What are students’ opinions regarding Duolingo use in English classes?
2. Theoretical Framework
2.1. Mobile Learning and Mobile Assisted Language Learning
2.2. Social Presence
2.3. Duolingo
3. Methodology
3.1. The Program
3.2. Participants
3.3. Instructional Design
3.4. Intervention
3.5. Data Collection
3.5.1. Needs Analysis
3.5.2. Exams
3.5.3. Social Presence Scale
3.5.4. Follow-Up Interviews
- Do you think Duolingo is beneficial in your English studies?
- Do you think Duolingo helps you with socialization?
- What do you think about using Duolingo in English classes?
3.6. Data Analysis
4. Results
4.1. Results Regarding Needs Analysis
4.2. Results Regarding Exams
4.3. Results Regarding Social Presence Scale
4.4. Results Regarding Follow-Up Interviews
5. Conclusions
6. Implications
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, J.; Tigelaar, D.E.; Zhou, T.; Admiraal, W. The effects of mobile technology usage on cognitive, affective, and behavioural learning outcomes in primary and secondary education: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J. Comput. Assist. Learn. 2023, 39, 301–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pengnate, W. Students’ Attitudes and Problems towards the Use of Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL). In Proceedings of the 2018 5th International Conference on Business and Industrial Research (ICBIR), Bangkok, Thailand, 17–18 May 2018; pp. 590–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernacki, M.L.; Greene, J.A.; Crompton, H. Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 2020, 60, 101827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Manca, S. Snapping, pinning, liking or texting: Investigating social media in higher education beyond Facebook. Internet High. Educ. 2020, 44, 100707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tao, J.; Xu, Y. Parental support for young learners’ online learning of English in a Chinese primary school. System 2022, 105, 102718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Whyley, D. Barriers to mobile learning advancements in the United Kingdom. In Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education; Voogt, J., Ed.; Springer International Handbooks of Education Series; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2018; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
- Nikolopoulou, K.; Gialamas, V.; Lavidas, K.; Komis, V. Teachers’ readiness to adopt mobile learning in classrooms: A study in Greece. Technol. Knowl. Learn. 2021, 26, 53–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Prieto, J.C.; Hernández-García, Á.; García-Peñalvo, F.J.; Chaparro-Peláez, J.; Olmos-Migueláñez, S. Break the walls! Second-order barriers and the acceptance of mLearning by first-year pre-service teachers. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 95, 158–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikolopoulou, K. Internet of Toys for Young Children: Educational Value or Threat? In Research Anthology on Early Childhood Development and School Transition in the Digital Era; IGI Global: Hershey, PA, USA, 2023; pp. 85–100. [Google Scholar]
- Petersen, K.; Sachs, R. The language classroom in the age of networked learning. In Technology and L2 Learning: A Psycholinguistic Approach; Leow, R.P., Cerezo, L., Baralt, M., Eds.; De Gruyter Mouton: Berlin, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Stockwell, G.; Liu, Y.C. Engaging in mobile phone-based activities for learning vocabulary: An investigation in Japan and Taiwan. CALICO J. 2015, 32, 299–322. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/calicojournal.32.2.299 (accessed on 26 April 2023).
- Rosell-Aguilar, F. Autonomous language learning through a mobile application: A user evaluation of the busuu app. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2018, 31, 854–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burston, J. The reality of MALL: Still on the fringes. CALICO J. 2014, 31, 103–125. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/calicojournal.31.1.103 (accessed on 22 May 2023).
- Lye, L. Investigating the Effects of Mobile Apps on Language Learning Outcomes: A Study on Duolingo. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Falk, S.; Götz, S. Interactivity in language learning applications: A case study based on Duolingo. In Interaktivität Beim Fremdsprachenlehren und—Lernen mit Digitalen Medien: Hit Oder Hype? Zeyer, T., Stuhlmann, S., Jones, R.D., Eds.; Narr Francke Attempto Verlag GmbH Co.: Tübingen, Germany, 2016; pp. 237–258. [Google Scholar]
- Rolando, A.P.P.; Gabriela, R.E.A.; Carolina, M.S.E.; Antonio, A.R.M. Incidencia de Duolingo en el Desarrollo de las Habilidades Comunicacionales Verbales del Idioma Ingles a Nivel de Educación Superior. Eur. Sci. J. ESJ 2019, 15, 29–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statista. Number of Internet Users. 2023. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/265147/number-of-worldwide-internet-users-by-region/ (accessed on 11 April 2023).
- Loewen, S.; Crowther, D.; Isbell, D.R.; Kim, K.M.; Maloney, J.; Miller, Z.F.; Rawal, H. Mobile-assisted language learning: A Duolingo case study. ReCALL 2019, 31, 293–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoi, V.N. Understanding higher education learners’ acceptance and use of mobile devices for language learning: A Rasch-based path modeling approach. Comput. Educ. 2020, 146, 103761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yacci, M. Interactivity demystified: A structural definition for distance education and intelligent computer-based instruction. Educ. Technol. 2000, 40, 5–16. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/44428619 (accessed on 18 February 2023).
- Tu, C.-H.; McIsaac, M. The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. Am. J. Distance Educ. 2002, 16, 131–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, V.; Kang, Y.C.; Liu, G.Z.; Lin, W. Participants’ experiences and interactions on Facebook group in an EFL course in Taiwan. Asia-Pac. Educ. Res. 2016, 25, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sung, E.; Mayer, R.E. Five facets of social presence in online distance education. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2012, 28, 1738–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeung, M.W.; Yau, A.H. A thematic analysis of higher education students’ perceptions of online learning in Hong Kong under COVID-19: Challenges, strategies and support. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2022, 27, 181–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hsu, Y.Y.; Lin, C.H. Evaluating the effectiveness of a preservice teacher technology training module incorporating SQD strategies. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 2020, 17, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Renninger, K.A.; Shumar, W.; Barab, S.; Kling, R.; Gray, J. The centrality of culture and community to participant learning at and with the math forum. In Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004; pp. 181–209. [Google Scholar]
- Raes, A.; Vanneste, P.; Pieters, M.; Windey, I.; Van Den Noortgate, W.; Depaepe, F. Learning and instruction in the hybrid virtual classroom: An investigation of students’ engagement and the effect of quizzes. Comput. Educ. 2020, 143, 103682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Habib, S.; Haider, A.; Suleman, S.S.M.; Akmal, S.; Khan, M.A. Mobile assisted language learning: Evaluation of accessibility, adoption, and perceived outcome among students of higher education. Electronics 2022, 11, 1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Hwang, G.J.; Tu, Y.F.; Yin, Y.; Wang, Y. Research advancement and foci of mobile technology-supported music education: A systematic review and social network analysis on 2008–2019 academic publications. Interact. Learn. Environ. 2021, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duman, G.; Orhon, G.; Gedik, N. Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCALL 2015, 27, 197–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ekoç, A. Mobile language learning applications from the perspectives of adult language learners in Turkey. Shanlax Int. J. Educ. 2021, 9, 259–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, G.J.; Wu, P.H. Applications, impacts and trends of mobile technology-enhanced learning: A review of 2008–2012 publications in selected SSCI journals. Int. J. Mob. Learn. Organ. 2014, 8, 83–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehner, F.; Nosekabel, H. The role of mobile devices in e-learning first experience with e-learning environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education, Vaxjo, Sweden, 30 August 2002; pp. 103–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golonka, E.M.; Bowles, A.R.; Frank, V.M.; Richardson, D.L.; Freynik, S. Technologies for foreign language learning: A review of technology types and their effectiveness. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2014, 27, 70–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Toland, S.H.; Mills, D.J.; Kohyama, M. Enhancing Japanese University Students’ English-Language Presentation Skills with Mobile-Video Recordings. JALT CALL J. 2016, 12, 179–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khezrlou, S. Form-Focussed Instruction in CALL: What Do Learners Think? RELC J. 2019, 50, 235–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Plonsky, L.; Ziegler, N. The CALL-SLA interface: Insights from a second-order synthesis. Lang. Learn. Technol. 2016, 20, 17–37. [Google Scholar]
- Short, J.; Williams, E.; Christie, B. The Social Psychology of Telecommunications; Wiley: London, UK, 1976. [Google Scholar]
- Gunawardena, C.N.; Zittle, F.J. Social presence as a predictor of satisfaction within a computer-mediated conferencing environment. Am. J. Distance Educ. 1997, 11, 8–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garrison, D.R.; Anderson, T.; Archer, W. The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. Internet High. Educ. 2010, 13, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Annand, D. Social presence within the community of inquiry framework. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 2011, 12, 40–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arbaugh, J.B.; Cleveland-Innes, M.; Diaz, S.R.; Garrison, D.R.; Ice, P.; Richardson, J.C.; Swan, K.P. Developing a community of inquiry instrument: Testing a measure of the community of inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. Internet High. Educ. 2008, 11, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cui, G.; Lockee, B.; Meng, C. Building modern online social presence: A review of social presence theory and its instructional design implications for future trends. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2012, 17, 661–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oh, C.S.; Bailenson, J.N.; Welch, G.F. A systematic review of social presence: Definition, antecedents, and implications. Front. Robot. AI 2018, 114, 409295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wei, C.; Chen, N.; Kinshuk. A model for social presence in online classrooms. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 2012, 60, 529–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marie, S.M.J.A. Improved pedagogical practices strengthens the performance of student teachers by a blended learning approach. Soc. Sci. Humanit. Open 2021, 4, 100199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harrell, K.B. The Impact of Blended Learning on Social Presence, Cognitive Presence, Teaching Presence, and Perceived Learning. Ph.D. Thesis, Liberty University, Lynchburg, VA, USA, 2017. Available online: https://www.proquest.com/docview/1896118843?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true (accessed on 19 January 2023).
- Altunay, H.M. Depth or Breadth? How Do Elementary School Children Explore Information Actively? Master’s Thesis, Technische Universität München, München, Germany, 2022. Available online: https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/1693628 (accessed on 21 January 2023).
- Robertson, A. Duolingo Will Translate the Internet while Teaching Languages. The Verge, 16 December 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Govender, T.; Arnedo-Moreno, J. A survey on gamification elements in mobile language-learning applications. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (TEEM’20), Salamanca, Spain, 21–23 October 2020; ACM: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shortt, M.; Tilak, S.; Kuznetcova, I.; Martens, B.; Akinkuolie, B. Gamification in mobile-assisted language learning: A systematic review of Duolingo literature from public release of 2012 to early 2020. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2021, 36, 517–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mahmudah, L. An Analysis of Pronunciation Exercises in Duolingo Application and Its Contribution as English Learning Media. Unpublished. 2015. Available online: http://eprints.walisongo.ac.id/5059/1/113411023.Pdf (accessed on 20 May 2023).
- Putri, L.M.; Islamiati, A. Teaching listening using Duolingo application. J. Engl. Educ. 2018, 1, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huynh, D.; Zuo, L.; Iida, H. An assessment of game elements in language-learning platform Duolingo. In Proceedings of the 2018 4th International Conference on Computer and Information Sciences (ICCOINS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 13–14 August 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marques-Schafer, G.; da Silva Orlando, A.A. Languages learning conceptions and Duolingo: A critical analysis on its proposals and learners experiences. Texto Livre-Ling. E Tecnol. 2018, 11, 228–251. [Google Scholar]
- Nushi, M.; Eqbali, M.H. Duolingo: A Mobile Application to Assist Second Language Learning. Teach. Engl. Technol. 2017, 17, 89–98. Available online: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=478437 (accessed on 20 March 2023).
- Werbach, K. (Re)defining gamification: A process approach. In Persuasive Technology, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, Padua, Italy, 21–23 May 2014; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2014; pp. 266–272. [Google Scholar]
- James, K.K.; Mayer, R.E. Learning a second language by playing a game. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2019, 33, 669–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bustillo, J.; Rivera, C.; Guzmán, J.; Ramos, L. Benefits of using a mobile application in learning a foreign language. Sist. Telemática 2017, 15, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Kraalingen, I. A systematized review of the use of mobile technology in outdoor learning. J. Adventure Educ. Outdoor Learn. 2023, 23, 203–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Creswell, J.W.; Plano Clark, V.L. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, 2nd ed.; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Campbell, S.; Greenwood, M.; Prior, S.; Shearer, T.; Walkem, K.; Young, S.; Bywaters, D.; Walker, K. Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. J. Res. Nurs. 2020, 25, 652–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cambridge. Cambridge English Language Assessment (2023) Exam Format. Available online: https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/exams-and-tests/key/exam-format/ (accessed on 14 February 2023).
- Lotze, N. Duolingo: Motivating students via m-homework. Tesol J. 2020, 11, e00459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kessler, M. Supplementing mobile-assisted language learning with reflective journal writing: A case study of Duolingo users’ metacognitive awareness. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 2021, 36, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wallace, M.P. Individual differences in second language listening: Examining the role of knowledge, metacognitive awareness, memory, and attention. Lang. Learn. 2022, 72, 5–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunan, D. Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages: An Introduction; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Purwanto, H.N.; Faridi, A.; Rozi, F. The Effect of DuoLingo and SPADA to Teach Listening to Students with Different Achievement Levels. Engl. Educ. J. 2022, 12, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, W.C.V.; Hsieh, J.S.C.; Yang, J.C. Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance EFL learners’ oral proficiency. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 2017, 20, 142–157. Available online: https://www.jstor.org/stable/90002170 (accessed on 10 January 2023).
- Ciftci, H.; Kocoglu, Z. Effects of peer e-feedback on Turkish EFL students’ writing performance. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2012, 46, 61–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suwantarathip, O.; Wichadee, S. The Effects of Collaborative Writing Activity Using Google Docs on Students’ Writing Abilities. Turk. Online J. Educ. Technol.-TOJET 2014, 13, 148–156. [Google Scholar]
- Horst, M. Revisiting classrooms as lexical environments. In Lexical Processing in Second Language Learners: Papers and Perspectives in Honour of Paul Meara; Fitzpatrick, T., Barfield, A., Eds.; Multilingual Matters: Clevedon, UK, 2009; pp. 53–66. Available online: https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/d2a18d86-21de-43a2-b862-d149055c7f75/content (accessed on 22 February 2023).
- De Castro, A.P.; da Hora Macedo, S.; Pinto Bastos, H.P. DUOLINGO: An experience in English teaching. J. Educ. Instr. Stud. World 2016, 6, 59–63. [Google Scholar]
- Downing, M. Fostering Social Presence through Faculty–Student Interaction for Successful Online Learning. In Proceedings of the ATMAE 2013 Conference Proceedings Papers–Distance and Online Learning (DOL), New Orleans, LA, USA, 19–22 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, X.; Rollinson, J.; Plonsky, L.; Gustafson, E.; Pajak, B. Evaluating the reading and listening outcomes of beginning-level Duolingo courses. Foreign Lang. Ann. 2021, 54, 974–1002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dahri, N.A.; Al-Rahmi, W.M.; Almogren, A.S.; Yahaya, N.; Vighio, M.S.; Al-maatuok, Q.; Al-Adwan, A.S. Acceptance of Mobile Learning Technology by Teachers: Influencing Mobile Self-Efficacy and 21st-Century Skills-Based Training. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Munday, P. The case for using DUOLINGO as part of the language classroom experience. RIED Rev. Iberoam. Educ. A Distancia 2016, 19, 83–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feerick, E.; Clerkin, A.; Cosgrove, J. Teachers’ understanding of the concept of ‘embedding’ digital technology in education. Ir. Educ. Stud. 2022, 41, 27–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Item | Question | Indications |
---|---|---|
1 | Number the items you are good at from the strongest to the weakest with 1 to 7 |
|
2 | What kind of activities help you the most when learning English? Number the activities that help you the most from the most helpful to the least helpful with 1 to 10 |
|
Skill | Duration | Purpose | Sample Question |
---|---|---|---|
Reading and Writing | 1 h | Shows that participants understand simple written information |
|
Listening | 30 min | Shows that participants understand spoken material. |
|
Speaking | 8–10 min for each pair | Shows that participants can carry out a conversation exchanging questions and answers. |
|
KET | Experimental | Control | Effect Size | Sd (Exp.) | Sd (Cont.) | p |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Reading | 28.8 | 29.7 | −0.1 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 0.59 |
Writing | 15.2 | 13.2 | 0.78 | 2.2 | 1.8 | 0.2 |
Listening | 17.8 | 14.3 | 1.01 | 4.7 | 3.7 | 0 |
Speaking | 9.4 | 7.3 | 0.82 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 0 |
Points | Groups | N | ss | t Test | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t | Sd | p | ||||||
Social Presence Social Presence | Pre-test | 16 | 25.39 | 5.08 | 1.24 | −9.194 | 5.42 | 0.000 |
Post-test | 16 | 38.33 | 1.75 | 4.48 |
Points | Groups | N | ss | t Test | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
t | Sd | p | ||||||
Social Presence Social Presence | Pre-test | 16 | 23.15 | 1.30 | 0.314 | −1.486 | 6.23 | 0.170 |
Post-test | 16 | 25.34 | 5.73 | 1.40 |
Themes | Frequency |
---|---|
It is entertaining | 18 |
It follows the school program | 14 |
It provides a variety | 12 |
It is easily accessed (including being able to access out of school hours as well as the interface of the application) | 12 |
Parents give consent to go on the internet after school hours easily | 11 |
It is strictly followed by the teacher | 11 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Ergün-Elverici, S. Integrating Mobile Technologies: Two Stage Study on Academic Performance and Social Presence. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612505
Ergün-Elverici S. Integrating Mobile Technologies: Two Stage Study on Academic Performance and Social Presence. Sustainability. 2023; 15(16):12505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612505
Chicago/Turabian StyleErgün-Elverici, Sibel. 2023. "Integrating Mobile Technologies: Two Stage Study on Academic Performance and Social Presence" Sustainability 15, no. 16: 12505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612505
APA StyleErgün-Elverici, S. (2023). Integrating Mobile Technologies: Two Stage Study on Academic Performance and Social Presence. Sustainability, 15(16), 12505. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612505