Assessment and Suggestions on Sustainable Development of Regional Ecological Economy Based on Emergy Theory: A Case Study of Henan Province
Abstract
:1. Introduction
Application Areas | Motivations | Advantages | Disadvantages | Scholar/Year/Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|
Industrial ecosystem | To evaluate the sustainability of remanufacturing system | Transformed into a unified unit dynamic analysis area system, more fair, clear and intuitive, easy to calculate and proofread | The calculation of energy conversion rate and energy flow of multi-product or composite product system are complicated | Liu, 2021 [24] |
Compare the ecosystems of coastal cities | Qin, 2020 [27] | |||
Agricultural ecosystem | Evaluate canola production systems | Amiri, 2019 [30] | ||
Assessing the efficiency of potato agroecosystems | Shahhoseini, 2022 [31] | |||
The application of emergy in aquaculture system was discussed | David, 2021 [28] | |||
Regional eco-economic system | Evaluate the sustainable development of regional ecological economy | Wang, 2021 [32] | ||
The sustainability evaluation of 9 cities was analyzed and evaluated | Yuan, 2022 [35] | |||
Evaluate the ecological efficiency of regional circular economy | Liu, 2018 [36] |
- (1)
- We assume that there is a certain relationship between the level of ecological economic development and energy consumption in Henan Province.
- (2)
- We assume that there is a mutually promoting relationship between ecological economic development and social development in Henan Province.
- (3)
- We assume that there are certain contradictions and conflicts between ecological economic development and environmental protection in Henan Province.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Emergy Method and Evaluation Index
2.2. Evaluation Indexes
2.2.1. Natural Subsystem
- (1)
- The emergy self-sufficiency rate (ESR) is calculated using Equation (2) as the ratio of the local resource emergy input to the total emergy input (EMU) of a region [32].ESR = (EMR + EMN)/EMU
- (2)
- The ELR is calculated using Equation (3) and is equal to the ratio of the sum of the economic feedback emergy (EMI) and the EMN to the EMR [33].
- (3)
- The EWR is equal calculated according to Equation (4) and corresponds to the ratio of the waste emergy (EMW) of the region to the EMU of the region [36].
2.2.2. Economic Subsystem
- (1)
- The EDR is used to evaluate the degree of modernization of the regional economy and to measure whether the regional population is overloaded. The EDR is calculated using Equation (5) and is the EMU divided by the GDP [36].
- (2)
- The EER is the ratio of EMI to output emergy (EMO) and is calculated using Equation (6) [32].
- (3)
- The EIR refers to the ratio of the EMI to the sum of the EMR in the natural environment and the EMN (Equation (7)) [34].
- (4)
- The EYR is equal to the difference between the EMO and the EMW divided by the EMI (Equation (8)) [33].
2.2.3. Social Subsystem
- (1)
- The EPP is the ratio of EMU to population (P), as demonstrated by Equation (9) [36], and reflects people’s living standard. That is, the higher the standard of living, the higher the per capita emergy.
- (2)
- The EPA is the ratio of EMU to land area (A), as represented by Equation (10) [36], and reflects the intensity of economic development and the level of economic development. Hence, the greater the EPA, the more developed the economy is and the higher the grade.
- (3)
- The PCC is the ratio of EMR plus EMI to EPP (Equation (11)) [32] and is an indicator of the affordability of the urban population in the natural environment. That is, the smaller the PCC, the more stressed the region’s economic environment is and the weaker the foundation for sustainable development is.
2.2.4. Sustainability Index
- (1)
- The emergy-based sustainability index (ESI) is calculated as the ratio of net EYR to ELR, as demonstrated by Equation (12) [32]. Hence, the smaller the ESI, the weaker the sustainability.
- (2)
- The revised emergy-based sustainability index (ESI′) represents the ratio of the EYR and the ELR, multiplied by the EWR (Equation (13)) [32].
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Data Evaluation
3.2. Evaluation and Analysis of Indexes
3.2.1. Analysis of Natural Subsystem Evaluation Indexes
3.2.2. Analysis of Economic Subsystem Evaluation Indexes
3.2.3. Analysis of Social Subsystem Evaluation Indexes
3.2.4. Analysis of Sustainability Index
3.3. Policy Suggestions
3.3.1. Optimizing the Emergy Structure and Promoting Structural Upgrades
3.3.2. Reducing Waste Emissions and Developing a Circular Economy
3.3.3. Optimizing the Industrial Structure and Changing the Economic Growth Model
3.3.4. Controlling the Rate of Population Growth and Improving the Living Standards of Residents
3.4. Management Implications
4. Conclusions
Supplementary Materials
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wang, Y.; Zhang, L. Renewable energy and sustainable regional development: A comprehensive review. Energy Policy 2023, 45, 234–246. [Google Scholar]
- Li, X. The environmental consequences of regional industrial growth: A case study. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2023, 10, 123–135. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, G.; He, B.J.; Sun, P.; Liu, Y.; Li, R.; Ouyang, X.; Luo, K.; Li, S. Evolutionary trends of urban expansion and its sustainable development: Evidence from 80 representative cities in the belt and road initiative region. Cities 2023, 138, 104353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, H. Challenges and implications of regional economic growth on the environment. Environ. Dev. 2022, 43, 101337. [Google Scholar]
- Smith, J.; Johnson, A. International Cooperation in Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities. J. Environ. Policy Plan. 2022, 20, 345–362. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, Z.; Kourtzidis, S.; Tzeremes, P.; Tzeremes, N. A robust network DEA model for sustainability assessment: An application to Chinese Provinces. Oper. Res. 2020, 22, 235–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Zhang, Z.; Long, T.; Sun, S.; Gao, J. Mega-city region sustainability assessment and obstacles identification with GIS-entropy-TOPSIS model: A case in Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 294, 126147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Martinez, R.; Williams, S. Assessing the Environmental Impact of Regional Economic Activities: A Life Cycle Assessment Approach. Ecol. Econ. 2023, 65, 789–811. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Chen, J.; Wang, X. Quantitative Evaluation Model of the Quality of Remanufactured Product. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2023, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moutinho, V.; Madaleno, M. Assessing eco-efficiency in Asian and African countries using Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Energies 2021, 14, 1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, K. The Role of Social Capital in Fostering Regional Economic Sustainability. Environ. Plan. A 2022, 48, 567–589. [Google Scholar]
- Johnson, L. Modeling the Interactions between Economic Growth, Social Inclusion, and Environmental Preservation in Regional Development. Environ. Econ. Policy 2022, 28, 123–140. [Google Scholar]
- Garcia, R.; Martinez, L. Regional Economic Development and Sustainability: An Empirical Analysis. Reg. Sci. Inq. 2022, 15, 321–335. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, C.; Chen, J.; Cai, W. Data-driven remanufacturability evaluation method of waste parts. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2022, 18, 4587–4595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, H.; Wang, L. The Role of Innovation in Sustainable Regional Economic Development: Evidence from Developing Countries. J. Reg. Sci. 2023, 52, 56–71. [Google Scholar]
- Mohammadzadeh, A.; Taghavifar, H. A robust fuzzy control approach for path-following control of autonomous vehicles. Soft Comput. 2020, 24, 3223–3235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, L.; Wang, S. An Emergy-Based Evaluation of Sustainable Development in Urban Systems. Sustainability 2022, 14, 78–92. [Google Scholar]
- Odum, H.T. Self-organization, transformity, and information. Science 1988, 242, 1132–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Cao, L.; Chen, Y.; Qiu, H.; Huang, X.; Guo, W.; Wang, S.; Sheng, W.; Zhou, L.; Xu, Q. Emergy analysis-based study of the sustainable development of Kunming’s urban eco-economic system. Int. J. Urban Sci. 2023, 27, 322–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Aghbashlo, R. Towards a better understanding of energy systems using emergy-based exergoeconoenvironmental analysis. Int. J. Exergy 2019, 28, 209–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Santagata, R.; Zucaro, A. Assessing the sustainability of urban eco-systems through Emergy-based circular economy indicators. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 109, 105859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babaelahi, M.; Rafat, E.; Mofidipour, E. Emergy-based economic and environmental analysis and multi-objective optimization of a two-cascade solar gas turbine power plant. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2019, 20, 165–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alkhuzaim, L.; Zhu, Q.; Sarkis, J. Evaluating emergy analysis at the nexus of circular economy and sustainable supply chain management. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 25, 413–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Gao, M.; Zhu, G.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, P.; Chen, J.; Cai, W. Data driven eco-efficiency evaluation and optimization in industrial production. Energy 2021, 224, 120170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jalili, M.; Chitsaz, A.; Holagh, S.G. Sustainability improvement in combined electricity and freshwater generation systems via biomass: A comparative emergy analysis and multi-objective optimization. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47, 472885–472899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Edrisi, S.A.; Sahiba, S.A.; Chen, B.; Abhilash, P.C. Emergy-based sustainability analysis of bioenergy production from marginal and degraded lands of India. Ecol. Model. 2022, 466, 109903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, F.; Wang, L.; Shao, S. Emergy comparison of typical coastal urban ecosystems in China. Complexity 2020, 2020, 8071242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- David, L.H.; Pinho, S.M.; Agostinho, F.; Kimpara, J.M.; Keesman, K.J.; Garcia, F. Emergy synthesis for aquaculture: A review on its constraints and potentials. Rev. Aquac. 2021, 13, 1119–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.M.; Liu, G.; Yang, Q.; Wang, X.; Casazza, M.; Agostinho, F.; Lombardi, G.V.; Giannetti, B.F. Emergy-based valuation of agriculture ecosystem services and dis-services. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 239, 118019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amiri, Z.; Asgharipour, M.R.; Campbell, D.E.; Armin, M. A sustainability analysis of two rapeseed farming ecosystems in Khorramabad, Iran, based on emergy and economic analyses. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 226, 1051–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahhoseini, H.; Ramroudi, M.; Kazemi, H. Emergy analysis for sustainability assessment of potato agroecosystems (case study: Golestan province, Iran). Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 25, 6393–6418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, C.; Hu, F.; Zhou, S.; Zhu, J. Emergy-based assessment and suggestions for sustainable development of regional ecological economy: A case study of Anhui province, China. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, W.; Geng, Y.; Dong, H.; Tian, X.; Zhong, S.; Wu, Q.; Li, S. An emergy accounting based regional sustainability evaluation: A case of Qinghai in China. Ecol. Indic. 2018, 88, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, Y.; Zhang, B.; Wu, Y.; Tian, Y. Sustainability assessment of urban ecological-economic systems based on emergy analysis: A case study in Simao, China. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 121, 107157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, X.; Chen, L.; Sheng, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, Y.; Jia, Y.; Qiu, D.; Wang, Q.; Ma, Q.; et al. Evaluation of regional sustainability through emergy analysis: A case study of nine cities in the Yellow River Basin of China. Env. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 40213–40225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, W.; Zhan, J.; Li, Z.; Jia, S.; Zhang, F.; Li, Y. Eco-efficiency evaluation of regional circular economy: A case study in Zengcheng, Guangzhou. Sustainability 2018, 10, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Cai, W.; Zhai, M.; Zhu, G.; Zhang, C.; Jiang, Z. Decoupling of wastewater eco-environmental damage and China’s economic development. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 789, 147980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, L.; Wang, C.; Zhao, J. Decision and coordination in the dual-channel supply chain considering cap-and-trade regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 197, 551–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babenko, V.; Zomchak, L.; Nehrey, M. Ecological and economic aspects of sustainable development of Ukrainian regions. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 280, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Y.; Yang, R.; Sun, M.; Zhang, L.; Li, X.; Meng, L.; Wang, Y.; Liu, Q. Regional sustainable development strategy based on the coordination between ecology and economy: A case study of Sichuan Province, China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 134, 108445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Research Methods | Motivations | Advantages | Disadvantages | Scholar/Year/Ref |
---|---|---|---|---|
DEA model | Assess regional efficiency in China 2000–2012 | It is a composite metric that deals with problems that have multiple inputs and outputs | The sample size is too small, the results are unreliable and cannot have too many variables | Chen, 2020 [6] |
Panel regression model | To examine the impact of environmental regulations on ecological efficiency | The model is simple and reflects the influence strength of multiple independent variables on a dependent variable | With few parameters, it is only applicable to small samples | Li, 2021 [9] |
SFA Technology | Assessing economic and environmental efficiency in Asia and Africa | The results were less affected by the special points | Too many input indicators will affect the reliability of the results | Moutinho, 2021 [10] |
Index | Expression | Definition | Scholar/Year/Ref |
---|---|---|---|
Emergy calculation index | |||
Renewable resource emergy | EMR | Various renewable emergy from nature | Odum, 1988 [18] |
Non-renewable resource emergy | EMN | Various non-renewable emergy from nature | Odum, 1988 [18] |
Economic feedback emergy | EMI | Emergy of products, information, technology, and labor services from outside the economic system | Odum, 1988 [18] |
Output emergy | EMO | Products and services output by the system | Odum, 1988 [18] |
Waste emergy | EMW | Wastewater, waste gas, and solid waste discharged from the system to the environment | Odum, 1988 [18] |
Total emergy | EMU = EMR + EMN + EMI | Sum of various emergy input | Odum, 1988 [18] |
Natural Subsystem | |||
Emergy self-sufficiency rate | ESR = (EMR +EMN)/EMU | Reflect the natural environment support capacity of the region | Wang, 2021 [32] |
Environmental load rate | ELR = (EMI + EMN)/EMR | Evaluate the impact of economic activities on the natural environment | Chen, 2018 [33] |
Waste-to-output rate | EWR = EMW/EMU | Reflect the pollution degree of economic activities to the natural environment | Liu, 2018 [36] |
Economic Subsystem | |||
Emergy currency rate | EDR = EMU/GDP | Evaluate the development degree of regional economy | Liu, 2018 [36] |
Emergy exchange rate | EER = EMI/EMO | Reflect the profit or loss of external transactions | Wang, 2021 [32] |
Emergy investment rate | EIR = EMI/(EMR + EMN) | Measure the degree of economic development and environmental load | Pan, 2021 [34] |
Emergy yield rate | EYR = EMU/EMI | Measure regional economic benefits | Wang, 2021 [32] |
Social Subsystem | |||
Per capita emergy | EPP = EMU/P | Reflect the material living standards of the people in the region | Liu, 2018 [36] |
Emergy density | EPA = EMU/A | Reflects land use efficiency | Liu, 2018 [36] |
Population carrying capacity | PCC = (EMR + EMI)/EPP | The carrying capacity of urban population at the current environmental level | Amiri, 2019 [31] |
Population carrying rate | PCR = P/PCC | Measure whether a region is overdrawn | Chen, 2022 [17] |
Sustainability Index | |||
Emergy-based sustainability index | ESI = EYR/ELR | Measure the status and level of sustainable development | Wang, 2021 [32] |
Revised emergy-based sustainability index | ESI’ = EYR/(ELR × EWR) | Comprehensively reflect the level of sustainable development | Wang, 2021 [32] |
Index | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Emergy calculation index | |||||||||
Renewable resource emergy | 3.42 × 1021 | 3.27 × 1021 | 3.08 × 1021 | 3.04 × 1021 | 3.25 × 1021 | 3.22 × 1021 | 3.34 × 1021 | 3.40 × 1021 | 3.30 × 1021 |
Non-Renewable resource emergy | 6.70 × 1024 | 7.62 × 1024 | 7.42 × 1024 | 7.30 × 1024 | 7.36 × 1024 | 7.67 × 1024 | 7.65 × 1024 | 7.67 × 1024 | 7.58 × 1024 |
Economic feedback emergy | 4.01 × 1023 | 5.33 × 1023 | 6.19 × 1023 | 6.86 × 1023 | 7.29 × 1023 | 7.22 × 1023 | 8.08 × 1023 | 8.76 × 1023 | 9.65 × 1023 |
Output emergy | 1.95 × 1024 | 2.27 × 1024 | 2.49 × 1024 | 2.72 × 1024 | 2.98 × 1024 | 3.19 × 1024 | 3.47 × 1024 | 3.86 × 1024 | 4.30 × 1024 |
Waste emergy | 3.39 × 1023 | 4.40 × 1023 | 4.58 × 1023 | 4.84 × 1023 | 4.76 × 1023 | 4.46 × 1023 | 4.17 × 1023 | 4.99 × 1023 | 5.35 × 1023 |
Total emergy | 7.11 × 1024 | 8.16 × 1024 | 8.05 × 1024 | 7.99 × 1024 | 8.09 × 1024 | 8.40 × 1024 | 8.46 × 1024 | 8.55 × 1024 | 8.54 × 1024 |
Population | 1.04 × 108 | 1.05 × 108 | 1.05 × 108 | 1.06 × 108 | 1.07 × 108 | 1.07 × 108 | 1.08 × 108 | 1.09 × 108 | 1.09 × 108 |
Natural Subsystems | |||||||||
Emergy self-sufficiency rate | 9.44 × 10−1 | 9.35 × 10−1 | 9.23 × 10−1 | 9.14 × 10−1 | 9.10 × 10−1 | 9.14 × 10−1 | 9.05 × 10−1 | 8.98 × 10−1 | 8.87 × 10−1 |
Environmental load rate | 2.08 × 103 | 2.50 × 103 | 2.61 × 103 | 2.63 × 103 | 2.49 × 103 | 2.60 × 103 | 2.53 × 103 | 2.51 × 103 | 2.59 × 103 |
Waste-to-output rate | 4.77 × 10−2 | 5.39 × 10−2 | 5.69 × 10−2 | 6.06 × 10−2 | 5.88 × 10−2 | 5.31 × 10−2 | 4.92 × 10−2 | 5.84 × 10−2 | 6.26 × 10−2 |
Economic Subsystems | |||||||||
Emergy currency ratio | 3.14 × 1012 | 3.10 × 1012 | 2.78 × 1012 | 2.53 × 1012 | 2.34 × 1012 | 2.26 × 1012 | 2.10 × 1012 | 1.91 × 1012 | 1.71 × 1012 |
Emergy yield rate | 1.77 × 101 | 1.53 × 101 | 1.30 × 101 | 1.17 × 101 | 1.11 × 101 | 1.16 × 101 | 1.05 × 101 | 9.76 × 100 | 8.85 × 100 |
Emergy exchange rate | 2.05 × 10−1 | 2.35 × 10−1 | 2.48 × 10−1 | 2.52 × 10−1 | 2.45 × 10−1 | 2.26 × 10−1 | 2.33 × 10−1 | 2.27 × 10−1 | 2.24 × 10−1 |
Emergy investment rate | 5.98 × 10−2 | 6.98 × 10−2 | 8.33 × 10−2 | 9.39 × 10−2 | 9.90 × 10−2 | 9.41 × 10−2 | 1.06 × 10−1 | 1.14 × 10−1 | 1.27 × 10−1 |
Social Subsystems | |||||||||
Per capita emergy | 6.81 × 1016 | 7.78 × 1016 | 7.63 × 1016 | 7.54 × 1016 | 7.59 × 1016 | 7.83 × 1016 | 7.85 × 1016 | 7.87 × 1016 | 7.83 × 1016 |
Emergy density | 4.26 × 1014 | 4.89 × 1014 | 4.82 × 1014 | 4.78 × 1014 | 4.85 × 1014 | 5.03 × 1014 | 5.07 × 1014 | 5.12 × 1014 | 5.12 × 1014 |
Population carrying capacity | 5.93 × 106 | 6.89 × 106 | 8.15 × 106 | 9.14 × 106 | 9.64 × 106 | 9.27 × 106 | 1.03 × 107 | 1.12 × 107 | 1.24 × 107 |
Population carrying rate | 1.76 × 101 | 1.52 × 101 | 1.29 × 101 | 1.16 × 101 | 1.11 × 101 | 1.16 × 101 | 1.04 × 101 | 9.72 × 10 | 8.82 × 10 |
Sustainability Index | |||||||||
Emergy-Based Sustainability Index | 9.06 × 10−3 | 6.57 × 10−3 | 5.39 × 10−3 | 4.85 × 10−3 | 4.91 × 10−3 | 4.88 × 10−3 | 4.58 × 10−3 | 4.33 × 10−3 | 3.85 × 10−3 |
Revised Emergy-Based Sustainability Index | 5.21 × 10−2 | 3.39 × 10−2 | 2.94 × 10−2 | 2.73 × 10−2 | 3.07 × 10−2 | 3.50 × 10−2 | 3.80 × 10−2 | 3.35 × 10−2 | 3.09 × 10−2 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Si, X.; Zhang, C.; Liu, F. Assessment and Suggestions on Sustainable Development of Regional Ecological Economy Based on Emergy Theory: A Case Study of Henan Province. Sustainability 2023, 15, 12495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612495
Si X, Zhang C, Liu F. Assessment and Suggestions on Sustainable Development of Regional Ecological Economy Based on Emergy Theory: A Case Study of Henan Province. Sustainability. 2023; 15(16):12495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612495
Chicago/Turabian StyleSi, Xiaoxiao, Cuixia Zhang, and Fan Liu. 2023. "Assessment and Suggestions on Sustainable Development of Regional Ecological Economy Based on Emergy Theory: A Case Study of Henan Province" Sustainability 15, no. 16: 12495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612495
APA StyleSi, X., Zhang, C., & Liu, F. (2023). Assessment and Suggestions on Sustainable Development of Regional Ecological Economy Based on Emergy Theory: A Case Study of Henan Province. Sustainability, 15(16), 12495. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612495