Next Article in Journal
Sustainable Assessment Tools for Higher Education Institutions: Developing Two-Hierarchy Tools for China
Previous Article in Journal
Exploring Interacting Effects of Forest Restoration on Wildfire Risk, Hydropower, and Environmental Flows
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Green Development Level Evaluation of Urban Engineering Construction in the Mid-Low Reaches of Yangtze River, China

Sustainability 2023, 15(15), 11550; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511550
by Danbei Mo, Liang Huang * and Linghong Zeng
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sustainability 2023, 15(15), 11550; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151511550
Submission received: 31 May 2023 / Revised: 14 July 2023 / Accepted: 24 July 2023 / Published: 26 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Infrastructure Development for Environmental Sustainability)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The article is well structured and the study uses the adequate methodology. The minor improvements could be done in the introductory part providing the illustration/position of the focus area in the wider context. Additionally, while mentioning different development concepts of cities, the link to their original authors/references could be provided.

The conclusion part could include more directions for the future applicability of the study - locally and internationally.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

the paper titled "Green Development Level Evaluation of Urban Engineering Construction in the Mid-Low Reaches of Yangtze River, China" provides an analysis of the status and efficiency of green development in urban engineering construction in the specified region. The adoption of comprehensive evaluation models and the super-efficiency slacks-based measure model contributes to the assessment of the development levels and factors influencing green development. The findings indicate an overall increase in both status and efficiency of green development, with visible changes in status and notable differences in efficiency. The paper also proposes countermeasures and suggestions for further enhancing the regional green development of urban engineering construction in China.

The paper provides valuable insights into the evaluation of green development in the specified region. However, there are a few areas that require improvement and clarification. Please address the following points:

 

Methodology: Provide a more detailed explanation of the comprehensive evaluation model and the super-efficiency slacks-based measure model. Include information on how these models were applied in the evaluation process and their suitability for assessing green development in urban engineering construction.

 

Data and Analysis: Describe the specific data sources utilized in the study and provide more information on the variables considered in the evaluation. This will enhance the transparency and replicability of the research. Additionally, elaborate on the statistical methods employed to analyze the data and draw conclusions from the results.

 

Results and Discussion: Present the results in a clear and concise manner, utilizing tables, figures, or graphs as necessary. Include a thorough discussion of the findings, highlighting the key trends, patterns, and significant factors influencing the status and efficiency of green development. Provide further insights into the distinct phases observed in the development of status and the prominent differences on the spatial scale for efficiency.

 

Countermeasures and Suggestions: Elaborate on the countermeasures and suggestions proposed for promoting the level of regional green development in China. Provide more specific details and practical recommendations on how these measures can be implemented. Consider discussing potential challenges and limitations associated with the suggested actions.

 

Language and Clarity: Improve the clarity and organization of the writing. Ensure that the abstract and the overall manuscript are written in clear and concise language, avoiding any ambiguous or convoluted statements. Proofread the paper to eliminate grammatical errors and improve readability.

 

the paper has potential and contributes to the understanding of green development in urban engineering construction. Addressing the points mentioned above will significantly enhance the quality and comprehensibility of the research.

 

 

 

Moderate editing of English language required

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Accept in present form

Back to TopTop