Sustainable Development Goals and Climate Change in Spanish Technology Disciplines’ Curricula: From LOMCE to LOMLOE

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Congratulations for this work that raises awareness about education policies related to climate change.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript on LOMLOE and its potential impact on sustainability and development. I appreciate your contribution to the field and believe that your work is relevant and timely.

However, after carefully reviewing your manuscript, I have a few concerns that I would like to address. Firstly, I feel that the title of the article needs to be improved. As the LOMCE has also been explored, it would be helpful to have a more specific title that highlights the focus of your article. This will make it easier for readers to understand the scope of your research.

Secondly, I noticed that the review of literature in your manuscript is very limited, with just 17 references. Given the importance of the topic and the potential impact of the LOMLOE on sustainability and development, I would suggest that you consider expanding the literature review to include more relevant sources.

Lastly, I was wondering why the LOE has not been included in your analysis. As LOMLOE is a modification of LOE, it would be interesting to know if there are any differences between the two with respect to sustainability and development. If you have any specific reasons for excluding LOE, I would appreciate it if you could provide an explanation in your manuscript.

I hope that you will consider my feedback and make the necessary revisions to your manuscript. Thank you for your hard work and contributions to the field.

Best regards,

Reviewer

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The article draws attention to the importance of education to prepare for sustainability and climate change, especially in technology-focused subjects/courses. A comparison of LOMLOE and LOMCE shows the changes that have taken place between 2006 and 2020 in terms of the emphasis placed on the importance of the topic. The text analysis used is an appropriate method to illustrate this.

It would be worthwhile to complement the analysis with a study that shows how the impact of changes to Organic Law of Education can be monitored in practice. For example, to what extent do recent graduates apply the skills and competences that are reflected in the changes in the laws when they enter the labour market? What good practices have resulted from the legislative changes which can be use against climate change?

A minor problem with the article is that the title is too long and the references are not enough. Beside this, there are too many Spanish sources.

Line 372: "technology" appears twice in the sentence one after the other

Line 375: there is an unnecessary end-of-sentence in the middle of the sentence

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

The manuscript under review examined the impact of the approval of the 2030 Agenda on the new educational legal framework regarding climate change and sustainable development in Spain. Although the focus of the study is of interest, the overall scope of the research is limited, and its contribution to the field of research is not significant.

One of the key issues with the manuscript is that the methodology was insufficiently presented. Data collection and data analysis techniques were not clearly explained, which makes it challenging to evaluate the validity and reliability of the research results. 

Furthermore, the author did not adequately address the research gap and contribution to the field. The author should have provided a more thorough and in-depth discussion of how the research fills a gap in the current literature and contributes to existing knowledge on the subject. The manuscript also lacks a clear and robust implication of the research findings.

The author used a qualitative approach to conduct the study, which is acceptable. However, the methodology's lack of detail and clarity undermines the quality of the research. 

Considering all these aspects, I recommend that the manuscript be rejected. The author must pay more attention to the research's contribution to the field, methodology, research gap, and implications of the research findings. Additionally, the author should provide a more comprehensive and detailed explanation of data collection and analysis techniques. With these changes, the manuscript can be improved and potentially contribute to the development of research in the field.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear authors, 

Thank you very much. My concerns have been met. The paper is suitable to be accepted for publication. 
Best regards, 

Reviewer

Author Response

Dear Reviewer 2, 
Thank you for reviewing our manuscript. We would like to express our gratitude for your time and effort in evaluating our work. We are delighted that our paper has now met your expectations.

Once again, thank you for your time and consideration.

Kind regards,
Sara Núñez-Sánchez 
Maria João Valente

Reviewer 4 Report

After a thorough review of the revised manuscript, there have been notable improvements in the overall quality. However, it is important to address a concern regarding the depth and interest level of the discussion section. To enhance the clarity and engagement of the discussion, I suggest the following revisions:

Firstly, reorganize the discussion section according to the three stated objectives of the paper. This can be achieved by creating three concise subheadings that align with each objective. By structuring the discussion in this manner, it will provide a clear framework for presenting and analyzing the findings.

Next, dedicate two paragraphs to each objective, thoroughly discussing and interpreting the corresponding findings. It is crucial to establish connections between the findings and broader contexts to highlight their significance. This can include discussing the implications of the results, drawing comparisons with existing literature, and identifying any notable patterns or trends observed in the analysis.

Furthermore, it is essential to include a subheading specifically addressing the implications of the findings. Elaborate on how these findings hold significance for policy developments at both national and international levels, as well as their potential impact on educational practices in teaching and learning. Provide a detailed discussion on how the findings can inform decision-making processes and contribute to the improvement of educational approaches in various settings.

By implementing these recommendations, the discussion section will become more comprehensive, insightful, and captivating for readers. It will effectively present the findings within a clear framework, establish connections to broader contexts, and elaborate on the implications of the research in relation to policy and educational practices.

I have no comment. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 3

Reviewer 4 Report

I appreciate your efforts in revising the manuscript. There has been a notable enhancement in the quality of the manuscript. Now, I am only concerned about the abstract. In its current form, it is weak and does not reflect any urgency for your study. It is recommended to consider revising the abstract by implementing the following suggestions:

In the first sentence, make a contradictory statement, for example. It is important that educational communities and society are aware of the changes that... but studies in this domain are... (e.g., scarce, etc.).

The second sentence states, for example, that to address this gap, this study... (objective). Then, the following sentences include the design of the research, instruments and measures, data collection, and data analysis.

After that, present the findings sequentially, following the research's objectives, and briefly discuss the implications of the findings.

Except for the first sentence and implications, past tense should be used.

Please use proofreading services if you haven't already.

Author Response

Please see attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 4

Reviewer 4 Report

Thank you for your revision. Best of luck!