Next Article in Journal
Stakeholder Perspectives on Supply Chain Risks: The Case of Indonesian Palm Oil Industry in West Papua
Previous Article in Journal
A Modified Process Analysis Method and Neural Network Models for Carbon Emissions Assessment in Shield Tunnel Construction
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Integration as a Driver of Enterprise Sustainability: The Russian Experience

Sustainability 2023, 15(12), 9606; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129606
by Nadezhda Shmeleva 1,*, Tatyana Tolstykh 1 and Olga Dudareva 2
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3:
Sustainability 2023, 15(12), 9606; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129606
Submission received: 26 April 2023 / Revised: 6 June 2023 / Accepted: 12 June 2023 / Published: 15 June 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please find the attached file.

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We deeply appreciate your valuable comments on our manuscript. Thank you very much for your time and concern.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

1. Please highlight the unique contribution of the study at the end of the abstract, the introduction and conclusion.

2. Please address your data source.

3. Please explain how the study reliability and validity can be checked 

4. Please jutify the rationale of your proposed model and why specific Independent variables were included.

5. Please explain the theory behind the study. If no theory please explain why.

 

I think the major problem of the present article are within the methodology section.  Since this is a model building study in which the aim of the article is to assess the resilience of industrial ecosystems by determining the collaborative maturity, resource stability and technological resilience of actors.  The study also presents a typology of integration forms between industrial enterprises based on symbiotic relationships. Yes, there is a hypothesis, however, if this is an empirical study, need data analysis to support it. Hence, where the data come from?  From government? or? Also, it is important for the authors to highlight their contribution in the knowledge body. Is it just another case in the discipline? of is it the typology that matters? or else. That's why I ask them to highlight the contribution for easier readership.

 

 

It's readable 

Author Response

We would like to thank the reviewer for the comments, we respond to each point and  identify changes in the revised manuscript.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer,

We deeply appreciate your valuable comments on our manuscript. Thank you very much for your time and concern.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Authors have addressed reviewer's concerns, and is ready to proceed for publication. 

Authors have addressed reviewer's concerns, and is ready to proceed for publication. 

Back to TopTop