Next Article in Journal
Allocation Efficiency of Public Sports Resources Based on the DEA Model in the Top 100 Economic Counties of China in Zhejiang Province
Next Article in Special Issue
Towards a Future Hydrogen Supply Chain: A Review of Technologies and Challenges
Previous Article in Journal
Maize Seedling Leave Counting Based on Semi-Supervised Learning and UAV RGB Images
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-Objective Energy Optimal Scheduling of Multiple Pulsed Loads in Isolated Power Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Comprehensive Review on Energy Storage System Optimal Planning and Benefit Evaluation Methods in Smart Grids

1
State Grid Economic and Technological Research Institute Co., Ltd., Beijing 102209, China
2
Department of Electrical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(12), 9584; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129584
Submission received: 3 May 2023 / Revised: 28 May 2023 / Accepted: 7 June 2023 / Published: 14 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Electric Power Systems: Design, Analysis and Control)

Abstract

:
Smart grids are the ultimate goal of power system development. With access to a high proportion of renewable energy, energy storage systems, with their energy transfer capacity, have become a key part of the smart grid construction process. This paper first summarizes the challenges brought by the high proportion of new energy generation to smart grids and reviews the classification of existing energy storage technologies in the smart grid environment and the practical application functions of energy storage in smart grids. Secondly, optimization planning and the benefit evaluation methods of energy storage technologies in the three different main application scenarios, including the grid side, user side, and new energy side, are analyzed. The advantages and shortcomings of the current research are also pointed out. Furthermore, the paper sheds light on the pressing issues that demand further consideration in energy storage planning. Finally, the aspects that warrant attention in the future application and promotion processes are elucidated in detail, culminating in a comprehensive understanding of the energy storage technologies in smart grids.

1. Introduction

Currently, many studies have focused on renewable energy sources, HVDC transmission projects [1], and the coupling of multiple energy sources because of the energy crisis and environmental concerns. The pursuit of carbon neutrality in the energy sector has been advocated by many countries globally as a means to combat climate change. The power industry, which is a major carbon emitter, must build a new type of power system with renewable energy as the mainstay and promote the development of sources, such as wind power and photovoltaic energy, to accelerate the decarbonization process. As society and the economy continue to develop, and with an increasingly strained energy supply, the development of new energy sources has become a crucial aspect of future energy strategies.
While the adoption of renewable energy sources can bring many benefits in responding to climate change and addressing the energy crisis, high levels of renewable energy penetration in power grids can also cause significant impacts on the grid. For one, the output of renewable energy is unpredictable and intermittent due to uncontrollable external factors, such as weather and the environment, making it difficult to meet the voltage and waveform requirements of an ideal power supply system and resulting in power quality problems. Voltage fluctuations and flicker, voltage imbalance, frequency deviation, a low power factor, and harmonic pollution are among the main impacts of high renewable energy penetration on power quality in a distribution network [2]. In order to reduce the negative impact of the randomness of new energy sources on a power grid, a new control method for doubly-fed wind generators was proposed [3]. The use of power electronics to connect renewable energy sources to the grid also inevitably introduces harmonic components to the grid [4]. Furthermore, the integration of new energy generation into the grid can exacerbate the problem of voltage imbalance in the grid, leading to additional power losses and reducing the capacity of transformers and lines [5]. The high proportion of renewable energy penetration can cause voltage fluctuations, which may interfere with sensitive electrical and electronic equipment and affect the safe and stable operation of the power system [6]. Additionally, due to the intermittent nature of renewable energy output and the uncertainty of load demand, the mismatch between power generation and load demand leads to deviations in grid frequency [7]. From a power dispatch perspective, generator sets can be categorized as controllable or uncontrollable, with controllable generator sets having less impact on traditional dispatching methods. Renewable energy units, as uncontrollable generator sets, often require power generation forecasts due to their dependence on weather and other unpredictable factors [8]. When uncontrollable renewable energy units are connected to the system, the power-dispatching process becomes more complicated [9]. These problems can be solved with the application of energy storage technology, which can effectively cope with access to new energy with high penetration rates. Thus, it is necessary to study energy storage capacity planning and economically analyze various types of energy storage technology.
With a smart grid scenario that combines centralized and distributed power generation, and a sizable portion of the total consumption supplied by decentralized generation, the role of decentralized generation becomes questionable in the absence of efficient and cost-effective energy storage system (ESS) technology. Nowadays, energy storage technology is widely used. For example, it has been applied in shipboard integrated power systems [10]. The widespread adoption of ESS technology enables the opportunity for demand-side management and peak load demand shaving, reducing the need for additional generation capacity to be deployed [11]. ESS technology can effectively realize demand-side management, eliminate the difference between peaks and valleys day and night, smooth the load, improve the utilization rate of power equipment, reduce power supply costs, and promote the use of renewable energy. It can also be used to improve the stability of the power system, adjust the frequency, and compensate for load fluctuations. Energy storage technology has become an important part of the development of smart grids. For integrating energy storage systems into a smart grid, the distributed control methods of ESS are also of vital importance. The study by [12] proposed a hierarchical approach for modeling and optimizing power loss in distributed energy storage systems in DC microgrids, aiming to reduce the losses in DC microgrids. In [13], a three-layer hierarchical control scheme was proposed to balance the state of charge (SoC) and state of health of distributed battery systems (DBS) in DC microgrids. The study by [14] proposed a unified loss model and a dual-ascent algorithm to optimize the current distribution coefficients in a DC microgrid with DESSs, achieving real-time loss minimization, adaptive current sharing, and robust performance in various scenarios.
This paper first summarizes the challenges brought by the high proportion of new energy generation to smart grids and reviews the classification of existing energy storage technologies in the smart grid environment and the practical application functions of energy storage in smart grids. Secondly, optimization planning and the benefit evaluation methods of energy storage technology in different application fields, including the power grid, users, and new energy, are analyzed. The advantages and shortcomings of the current research in the field are also pointed out. The algorithm of energy storage optimization planning is analyzed and summarized. Finally, the paper expounds on the problems that need to be further considered in energy storage planning and the aspects that should be paid attention to.
In summary, this paper makes a significant contribution by addressing the role of energy storage systems in the development of smart grids. It highlights the challenges associated with integrating a high proportion of renewable energy sources and provides an overview of the existing energy storage technologies and their practical applications in smart grids. We also analyze optimization planning and benefit evaluation methods for energy storage in three key application scenarios: the grid side, the user side, and the new energy side. Additionally, we discuss algorithmic approaches to energy storage optimization planning and identify pressing issues that require further consideration. By offering insights into future applications and promotion processes, the paper provides a comprehensive understanding of energy storage technologies in the context of smart grids, benefiting researchers, practitioners, and policymakers alike.

2. Challenges for Smart Grid and Energy Storage Role Analysis

With the rapid development of power electronic conversion and new energy power generation technologies, such as wind and photovoltaic, the power system has undergone profound changes and gradually transitioned into a new power system stage characterized by a high proportion of new energy. The operating characteristics of the system are changing profoundly, and the power and energy balance at multiple time scales is facing new and significant challenges. Diversified energy storage technologies can control the input and output of power and energy at different time scales, which is expected to improve the stability and operation characteristics of smart grids. This section analyzes the main challenges faced by smart grids and the application requirements for energy storage.
Different from the traditional power system, the new power system takes new energy units and power electronic equipment as the main body. It has the characteristics of power electronic control, multiple time scales, low inertia, and weak immunity, and also combines the strong randomness and high volatility of primary energy, which brings new major challenges to the power–energy balance of the power system at multiple time scales.
In a short time scale, a high proportion of new energy connected to the power grid will not only affect all aspects of classical stability but will also cause new stability problems. The access to a large number of new energy units will change the power grid structure and power flow distribution, which will have a significant impact on the stability of the small disturbance/transient power angle, voltage stability, and frequency stability characterized by electromechanical dynamics. The degree of impact depends on the new energy penetration rate, unit type, access location, operating conditions, and control strategy.
In the medium and long time scales, the main challenges brought by the high proportion of new energy access to the smart grid are as follows: The increasing proportion of new energy sources, such as wind power and photovoltaic, with strong randomness and volatility, makes the adjustability and flexibility of the power grid decrease, resulting in the difficulty of achieving power and energy balance between the source and load and the deterioration of the economy. In the traditional power system, whether it is thermal power, hydropower, or nuclear power on the power supply side, its power and electricity can be efficiently adjusted in a large capacity and a wide time range to meet random but predictable load changes. In the new energy high penetration power system, primary energy sources, such as wind and photovoltaic, are random and uncontrollable and fluctuate greatly due to seasonal and diurnal changes, and some special meteorological factors can cause sharp changes in the output in a short period. The mismatch between new energy and the load, coupled with the decreasing proportion of flexible resources, makes it more difficult to achieve reliable and efficient operation of the power grid through traditional dispatching.
In summary, with access to a high proportion of new energy and power electronic equipment in the power system, the stability of a short time scale and the operational reliability of the medium and long time scales pose major challenges, and it is urgent to find technologies and equipment that can adjust the power and energy within a wide time scale to ensure the stability and economy of the operation of the new power system. With their energy transfer capacity, energy storage systems have become a key part of the future development of smart grids. Table 1 summarizes the challenges of smart grids regarding the power–energy balance and the role of energy storage systems.

3. Overview of Energy Storage Technologies and Their Practical Application Functions

The status quo of energy storage functions in smart grids is classified according to [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66].

3.1. Overview of Energy Storage Technologies

With an array of highly specialized and distinct electrical energy storage technologies available, the world of electrical energy storage can be split into six distinct categories based on their configurations and forms, including mechanical, chemical, electrochemical, electromagnetic, thermal, and hybrid energy storage systems [44,45,46,47]. Each energy storage system differs from the others based on various factors, such as discharge time, discharge loss, energy density, wattage rating, and life cycle [48]. Pumped hydro storage, compressed air storage, and battery energy storage are the current energy storage technologies with higher technical maturity and more applications. While pumped hydro storage and compressed air storage are more suited to peak adjustment of the power grid, battery storage energy is better suited for small- and medium-sized energy storage and new energy power generation. In contrast, superconducting electromagnetic energy storage and flywheel energy storage is more suitable for power grid frequency adjustment and electrical quality guarantee. Finally, supercapacitor energy storage are more suitable for electric vehicle energy storage and hybrid energy storage [49]. As seen in Figure 1, the specific classification of various types of energy storage is quite complex, but careful consideration of each system’s strengths and weaknesses can allow for the optimal selection and application of energy storage technology.
(1)
Mechanical energy storage
The transformation of energy from mechanical to electrical forms is a complex process in mechanical energy storage systems. In this regard, three types of mechanical energy storage have been in use for a long time: compressed air energy storage, flywheel energy storage, and pumped energy storage. Among these, pumped energy storage is the most widely used and largest form of energy storage, where energy is converted into water potential energy for storage and then released through a turbine for conversion into electrical energy. This system boasts a large capacity, long life cycle, high efficiency, and cost-effectiveness, which makes it suitable for frequency regulation, peak shaving, emergency backup, and other scenarios. However, it also has high site environment requirements.
Compressed air energy storage, on the other hand, utilizes electric energy to compress air into a confined space, and then uses compressed air to push a steam turbine into electrical energy. It is further divided into traditional types, including those with heat storage devices, and liquid gas types. This system has the characteristics of a long storage period, large capacity, low cost, and high efficiency, with an efficiency rating of 70–89% and a rated power of 50–300 MW. However, it also has high site environment requirements.
Lastly, flywheel energy storage uses a flywheel’s angular momentum to store energy, where the motor drives the flywheel during charging, and the flywheel drives the generator to generate electricity during discharging. The stored energy is dependent on the flywheel’s size, mass, and speed, while the rated power is dependent on the motor and generator. Flywheel energy storage has low maintenance and long life, making it suitable for high-power, short-term scenarios, such as improving the power quality, providing reactive power support, and providing rotational backup.
(2)
Electromagnetic energy storage
Electromagnetic energy storage has been a hot topic in the energy storage field, especially the two main forms of supercapacitors and superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES). They have been identified as having high efficiency, high energy density, and high cost.
SMES is a promising energy storage solution that stores energy in the form of electromagnetic energy. The stored energy is converted through superconducting material coils, and its efficiency is more than 95%, thanks to the near-zero resistance of superconductors. SMES also boasts fast response times and a long life cycle, making it a popular option for improving transmission and system capacity, enhancing the power supply quality, and ensuring operational stability. However, the cost of SMES is still a limitation to its widespread adoption, as well as the superconducting critical temperature and potential environmental impact.
Supercapacitors have a simpler construction, consisting of two non-reactive porous electrode plates suspended in an electrolyte and charged on the plate. By electrochemically polarizing the electrolyte, it achieves energy storage without any electrochemical reactions occurring in the process, making it a reversible process. Supercapacitor energy storage has the advantages of a higher power density and long service life, making it ideal for high-power, short-term load smoothing, and high-peak power occasions, such as high-power DC motor starting support and dynamic voltage restorers.
(3)
Electrochemical energy storage
Compared to other types of energy storage, the electrochemical energy storage technology represented by batteries has the widest diversity and the fastest development, and different kinds of chemical energy storage can meet various power system demands. Electrochemical energy storage uses the conversion between electrical energy and chemical energy for the storage and release of electrical energy. It has good environmental adaptability, a fast response ability, low standby loss, and high energy efficiency (60–95%). However, due to its characteristics of a small power capacity, high maintenance cost, short life cycle, and limited discharge capacity, the application scale is small. At present, the battery energy storage technologies that have been commercialized or demonstrated mainly include lead–acid batteries, lithium-ion batteries, sodium–sulfur batteries, and flow batteries [50].
Lead–acid batteries are super cheap and have a large energy storage capacity. However, they have some serious issues with self-discharge, a short life cycle, heavy metal contamination, and deep discharge.
Lithium-ion batteries can be combined in series or in parallel to provide high voltage or high capacity, but they are pretty expensive. However, they have a high energy density and great charge and discharge efficiency.
Sodium–sulfur batteries have a lot going for them, such as high energy density, excellent charge and discharge efficiency, cheap operating costs, modest space requirements, and simple maintenance. The depths of their discharge and life cycle, however, still need to be enhanced and preserved while in use. The utilization rate of their electric energy is 100% [51].
Flow batteries have the advantages of high power output, fast response, high energy conversion rate, simple maintenance, safety, and stability, and are currently the most popular batteries. However, their material costs are high. Nevertheless, they are a top pick for large-scale grid-connected power generation, energy storage, and regulation [52].
This paper provides the fundamental properties of various electrochemical energy storage methods in Table 2 to make comparisons among them.
(4)
Chemical energy storage
Chemical energy storage is a highly sophisticated system that enables the storage and release of energy through chemical reactions, resulting in the formation of other compounds. This futuristic technology is characterized by zero emissions and an impressive storage capacity of over 100 GWh [54]. One of the prime examples of chemical storage is the fuel cell, which continually converts the chemical energy of fuel into electrical energy. Fuel cells, unlike batteries, produce energy by integrating fuel and oxidizers from the outside. The significant advantage of fuel cells is that they can generate electricity as long as they receive active substances. Fuel cells’ fuel efficiency generally ranges from 40 to 85%.
Fuel cell technology, being an excellent source that can reduce fossil fuel usage and CO2 emissions, is composed of a liquid or gaseous fuel as the anode and oxidants, such as oxygen, air, or chlorine, as the cathode. The hydrogen fuel cell, in particular, is highly favored in the market. This type of fuel cell uses a combination of hydrogen and oxygen to generate electricity, which can be regenerated and reversed by water and electricity. The hydrogen storage tank’s size optimization enables the storage of large amounts of energy in fuel cells regardless of the rated power. These fuel cells are applied in distributed microgrid power generation scenarios and the automotive industry, where only water vapor is released into the environment.
(5)
Thermal energy storage
Thermal energy storage is an innovative technology that can store energy from electric or solar heaters in a reservoir for later use in heating systems or power plants. The technology offers a wide range of options, including latent heat storage, sensible heat storage, and thermochemical adsorption storage systems. Latent heat storage systems utilize various materials, including organic (such as paraffin), inorganic (such as hydrochloride), and phase-change materials (PCMs), to store energy during the phase change of the storage medium [55]. Molten salt is the latest solid–liquid PCM, and it is being used in concentrated solar power plants [56]. Latent heat storage systems have a high energy density, high heat transfer efficiency, and constant temperature capacity [57]. Sensible thermal storage systems are the most common, and they utilize various media, including solids (such as ground, cast iron, or concrete) or liquids (such as water or thermal oil) to store energy. The storage capacity of sensible thermal storage systems depends on the heat capacity of the material used. The technology is versatile, reliable, and can be used in many heating applications, including district heating systems and industrial processes.
In addition, thermal energy storage may be considered to be extended to a more general type. Integrated energy systems go beyond traditional electrical energy storage and incorporate storage-like effects from other energy carriers, such as the heating network [58] and the gas network [59]. By integrating thermal energy storage, heating networks, and gas networks, an integrated energy system can exploit the storage-like effects of these interconnected networks to optimize energy utilization and enhance system flexibility. Further research and development are needed to explore the technical, economic, and regulatory aspects of expanding energy storage to include thermal energy storage and integrated energy systems. By leveraging the storage potentials from diverse energy carriers, we can unlock additional flexibility and enhance the overall performance and reliability of future energy systems.
(6)
Hybrid energy storage
A hybrid energy storage system is the process of complementing the characteristics of two or more heterogeneous storage systems to create a super energy storage device. In the harsh operating environments of real-time applications, a single ESS system cannot meet all ideal specifications (such as energy density, power rating, operating temperature, discharge rate, life cycle, and cost). The main goal of hybrid systems is to combine high-energy-density (usually slow-response systems) with high-power-density (fast-response system) equipment to achieve high-energy and high-power rating characteristics for fast response [60].
Hybrid energy storage systems have been developed that electronically combine the output power of two or more energy storage systems with complementary characteristics. In hybrid energy storage systems, heterogeneous systems are organized in such a way that short-term high-power requirements will be provided by high-power devices, while long-term energy requirements will be met by high-energy devices [61]. Hybrid energy storage systems are divided into battery and battery hybrids, battery and supercapacitor hybrids, fuel cell and battery hybrids, battery and SMES hybrids, battery and flywheel hybrids, etc. The size and possible combinations of hybrid energy storage systems depend on factors such as environmental, economic, and type of use [62]. The use of multifunctional hybrid energy storage systems is the best choice for building smart grids and requires interdisciplinary collaboration and research to further develop and advance the field.

3.2. Temperature Regulation Technologies for Energy Storage Systems

Temperature regulation plays a crucial role in ensuring the optimal operation and longevity of ESS in smart grids [63]. Effective temperature management involves utilizing thermal models, implementing thermal regulations, and employing appropriate cooling technologies.
Thermal models are used to simulate and predict the temperature behavior of ESS components. These models consider factors such as the heat generation, heat transfer, and thermal capacitance of the storage system. Different types of thermal models, including lumped parameter models, distributed parameter models, and electro-thermal coupled models, can be utilized to understand the thermal characteristics of the ESS. These models enable accurate temperature predictions, aiding in the design and optimization of thermal management strategies.
Thermal regulation involves establishing temperature limits and implementing control strategies to maintain the ESS within a safe operating range. This includes defining the upper and lower temperature thresholds for various components and implementing control algorithms to regulate the temperature. Thermal regulation is essential for preventing excessive temperatures that can degrade the performance, capacity, and lifespan of the ESS. By carefully monitoring and controlling temperature levels, the system can operate efficiently and safely.
Cooling technologies are employed to manage and dissipate heat generated by the ESS components. Different cooling methods can be utilized based on the specific requirements and constraints of the system. Some commonly used cooling technologies include air cooling, liquid cooling, phase-change materials (PCMs, and heat pipes. Air cooling utilizes fans or natural convection to remove heat from the ESS components. Air cooling is cost-effective and suitable for low- to medium-power applications. Liquid cooling involves circulating a coolant, such as water or a specialized coolant fluid, through heat exchangers or directly in contact with the ESS components. Liquid cooling offers higher heat-transfer efficiency and is suitable for high-power or high-temperature applications. PCMs can absorb or release latent heat during phase transitions, making them ideal for passive cooling in the ESS. These materials store and release heat energy as they change from solid to liquid or vice versa, helping to stabilize temperatures within the system. Heat pipes are heat transfer devices that use the principles of evaporation and condensation to efficiently transport heat from the ESS components to cooler areas or heat sinks. They offer high thermal conductivity and are particularly effective for removing heat from concentrated areas.

3.3. Practical Application Functions of Energy Storage

Energy storage equipment can realize the input and output regulation of electric energy at different time scales, which can effectively improve the operating characteristics of the system and meet the power and energy balance requirements of a smart grid. The application of different energy storage technologies in power systems is also different. As can be seen in Table 3, for the power type and application time scale of energy storage, the current application of energy storage in the power grid mainly focuses on power frequency active regulation, especially in rapid frequency regulation, peak shaving and valley filling, and new energy grid-connected operation. From the perspective of the application distribution of energy storage in the power grid, it mainly includes the following aspects:
(a)
The functions of the power generation side mainly include fast frequency regulation, the suppression of low-frequency oscillation, automatic generation control, smoothing new energy output fluctuations, new energy output plan tracking, new energy output climbing control, etc.
(b)
The functions of the transmission and distribution network side mainly include optimizing new energy integration, delaying transmission and distribution line blockage, delaying equipment upgrading, and optimizing power flow distribution.
(c)
Load-side functions mainly include improving the power quality, providing distributed energy supply, participating in market regulation, etc.

4. Optimal Configuration of the Energy Storage System in Different Scenarios

Energy storage is one of the most important links in smart grids, and power systems face many challenges with future access to a high proportion of renewable energy. Energy storage technology is considered to be one of the key technologies to balance the intermittency of variable renewable energy to achieve high penetration. A connection structure diagram of an energy storage system and a public power grid is shown in Figure 2.
Energy storage systems are applied in different scenarios, and their main role and the value of different investors are also different. Researchers have spent considerable time and effort devising optimal plans for deploying energy storage technology across diverse applications, and have even developed models to evaluate its economic impact. The different scenarios for energy storage can generally be categorized into three main categories: grid-side, user-side, and new energy-side applications, which include microgrids. The distinctive value proposition of energy storage in each scenario is highlighted in Figure 3, illustrating the multifaceted nature of energy storage applications.

4.1. Optimal Configuration of Energy Storage System on the Grid Side

Energy storage systems are a highly sophisticated technology that has revolutionized the power grid in more ways than one. By deferring the upgrading of the power grid, reducing transmission resistance, alleviating peak adjustment pressure, and providing auxiliary services, these systems have significantly improved the reliability of the power supply and the quality of power, bringing about numerous benefits to users. However, the complexity of energy systems has made it difficult to optimize their performance.
Different research studies have focused on various aspects of energy storage systems, resulting in different target functions. The existing research has predominantly aimed to maximize the return on investment by optimizing the allocation of energy storage. In [67], a maximum optimization model of the income was established, and then the genetic algorithm combining linear planning was used to solve it. This was carried out while considering the advantages of delaying the grid upgrade, decreasing the cost of blocking, and the high income and high arbitrage of the power grid. In [68], considering the aspects of energy storage systems in delaying grid upgrading, providing auxiliary services, improving transmission network equipment utilization, load, and power generation optimization management, etc., a multi-objective optimization model was established, with the largest net present value and the lowest cost. The genetic algorithm was used to solve the problem, and the optimal capacity and economy of the energy storage system were analyzed. Reference [69] improved the economic efficiency of planning by utilizing the particle swarm optimization algorithm and considering the profits of distributed generation operators and energy storage operators as the objective function. In [70], the objective was to minimize the overall annual cost of planning. They employed simulated annealing and the lion algorithm to achieve the coordinated optimization of energy storage and active distribution network planning. In [71], a coordinated planning method for the transformation of energy storage and thermal power units, taking into account the benefits of auxiliary service revenue, was proposed by analyzing the deep peak shaving of thermal power units and the peak–valley arbitrage of energy storage. In [72], in order to enhance the overall peak-shaving benefits and promote the enthusiasm for peak-shaving transactions in a multi-source system, proactive peak-shaving constraints were introduced to the energy storage-assisted thermal power unit peak-shaving model.
Some studies have planned with the goal of achieving the best social benefits brought by a specific purpose of the energy storage system, such as the goal of maximizing the emission reduction effect of the power grid after the construction of the energy storage system. In [73], aiming at superconducting magnetic energy storage features in a power grid, the characteristics of power operation were optimized, with minimalization of the total system’s total carbon dioxide emissions as the goal, and using the Lagrange multi-plication method to combine the K-T conditions for a solution. In [74], an optimization model was established for the combined dispatch of solar thermal power generation and thermal power generation, with the objective of minimizing the system’s curtailed wind and solar power. In [75], they proposed a coordinated planning method for energy storage and thermal power unit flexibility transformation, focusing on deep peak-shaving compensation of the thermal power units and the peak–valley arbitrage of energy storage. In [76], to maximize the total life cycle benefit of battery energy storage systems in the distribution network, a hybrid optimization model was established by considering factors such as energy storage arbitrage income, government electricity price subsidy income, reducing electric energy conversion freight, delaying power grid upgrading, and life-cycle cost. In [77], taking the sodium–sulfur energy storage system as an example, the economy of transmission operation was evaluated based on the operation model of a wind storage and transmission dual system. The correlation between the operating cost of the energy storage system and the number of discharges was analyzed in depth, and the improved particle swarm algorithm was used to solve the established optimization model. In [78], considering the health state of energy storage batteries, a configuration model was established to maximize the net return of the system, and the appropriate ratio of photovoltaic, energy storage, and load was obtained.
Energy storage systems are installed in power grids, and the benefits generated have many aspects. These benefits generally do not all belong to the investment subject but have real significance. However, when the unit cost of the energy storage system is too high, it is often concluded that it is not economical due to ignoring other hidden economic values, which is not conducive to the commercialization of this technology. How to comprehensively evaluate the value of the energy storage system and measure the social and economic benefits and beneficiary subjects attached to it so that investors to obtain the support of national policies needs to be studied.

4.2. Optimal Configuration of Energy Storage Systems on the New Energy Side

As an important means to increase the consumption of new energy, energy storage will become the mainstream trend of new energy development against the background of “carbon peaking and carbon neutrality”, requiring the vigorous development of new energy, such as wind and solar. Energy storage systems play a major role in smoothing the fluctuation of new energy output power, improving new energy consumption, reducing the deviation of the power generation plan, and improving the safe operation stability of the power grid. Specific classification scenarios are shown in Figure 4. How to rationally allocate energy storage to meet the relevant needs in different application scenarios while improving the economy has become an urgent problem to be solved.
The configuration of energy storage on the new energy side needs to consider the randomness of new energy output and the indicators in single- or multiple-application scenarios. According to the uncertainty of new energy output and the different goals of energy storage optimal allocation, the uncertainty, economic benefits, environmental benefits, technical benefits, and multi-factor comprehensive evaluation indicators of new energy output were selected to establish an optimal energy storage allocation model, as shown in Figure 5.
The uncertainty and power prediction error of new energy output, such as wind power and photovoltaic sources, will affect the results of energy storage planning. By applying the uncertainty programming method to energy storage optimization configuration, the uncertainty optimization problem can be transformed into a deterministic optimization problem, thus simplifying the solving process of energy storage planning. The uncertainty planning method mainly includes random planning, fuzzy planning, robust optimization, and a scene analysis method.
Random planning is a traditional optimization method to respond to the uncertainty of modeling and establish the probability density function of wind power and photovoltaic. The Weibull probability distribution function is commonly used to model wind power, and the Beta probability distribution function is used to model photovoltaic [79,80]. The fuzzy programming method describes the uncertainty of wind power by constructing a fuzzy membership function in which the trapezoidal membership function is often used to deal with the uncertainty of wind power in the field of high-proportion wind power system optimization [81]. Robust optimization is a way to solve the problem of uncertain parameter optimization. In [82], the robust optimization programming method was used to construct a set of probability distribution functions of wind power output based on historical data, and the curtailment rate of the wind requirement was taken as the robust opportunity constraint to establish a robust opportunity constraint programming model, with the minimum energy storage investment cost as the goal and the curtailment rate of the wind as the constraint. In [83], the robust joint opportunity constraint model of probability distribution was used to describe the optimal configuration of energy storage in wind farm systems, and the robust opportunity constraint model was transformed into a deterministic linear matrix inequality problem. The scenario analysis method is a kind of probability distribution model with random variables in specific scenes and simulates the distribution of original random variables with as few scenarios as possible to transform the stochastic optimization problem into a deterministic optimization problem. The photovoltaic output was separated into five typical weather conditions according to the headroom model, and the probability density function was calculated by fitting the distribution parameters in [84].
According to the different energy storage optimal allocation goals, the existing literature has selected economic, environmental protection, technical, and multi-factor comprehensive evaluation indicators to construct an optimal allocation model for energy storage. In the optimal configuration of an energy storage system, the economic factor usually considers the minimum total cost and maximum total benefit. In [85], a planning model was established with the minimum total cost of the system as the optimization goal, and the power supply and energy storage capacity under the three cost scenarios of high, medium, and low were comprehensively optimized. In addition, economic analysis of energy storage instead of thermal power was proposed by new energy allocation. In [86], the impact of an energy storage system’s capacity on the economy of the whole life cycle of the system was studied to minimize the total cost of the system, including grid power supply costs, photovoltaic power generation costs, and battery charging and discharging depreciation costs. In [87], to minimize the total power generation cost of the system, a nonlinear optimization planning model of the combined wind-pumped storage system was established, the optimal energy storage scale under different wind speed characteristics was analyzed, and the benefits of the system in reducing carbon dioxide emissions were calculated. In [88], aiming at the optimal allocation of capacity of the photovoltaic energy storage system, a maximum intraday net income objective function model of the photovoltaic storage system was constructed. Environmental indicators usually include the emissions of CO2 and other pollutants. In [89], the annual environmental cost was included in the objective function of the energy storage optimal allocation model, and the lower the annual environmental cost, the higher the utilization rate of new energy in the region. In [90], the establishment of a carbon emission cost calculation model fully considered the environmental factors of carbon emissions to achieve the minimum system operating cost, and at the same time, reduced the curtailment of wind, photovoltaic power generation, and load reduction. In the optimal configuration model of energy storage, the technical indicators mainly include voltage quality and system network loss. In [91], the voltage stability margin was used as the index to pre-select the site, and based on considering the charging and discharging state of the energy storage equipment, the active network loss was taken as the objective function to determine the installation location and capacity of the energy storage system. In [92], the voltage timing sensitivity was proposed to plan the installation location and capacity of the energy storage system from the perspective of improving the voltage distribution. In [93], by calculating the power loss sensitivity, the energy storage was selected in the position with the highest power loss sensitivity.
In the actual energy storage planning problem, it is difficult to achieve the best optimization configuration effect by considering a single optimization goal. Therefore, scholars have carried out a large number of studies on energy storage planning methods that take into account multiple factors based on single objectives. In [94], a phased capacity optimization allocation model was proposed. In the first stage, the maximum consumption of new energy was the target, and in the second stage, the minimum storage cost to meet the utilization rate of new energy was the optimization objective. In [95], the upper model aimed at the minimum annual comprehensive cost, and the lower model aimed at the minimum system network loss. In [96], the upper layer aimed to maximize the total capacity of the power station, and the lower layer aimed to minimize the investment cost to optimize the wind storage ratio. In [97], the upper layer aimed to select the site with the best improvement effect of voltage fluctuation, and the lower layer targeted the minimum investment cost for a volumetric setting. In [98], the upper layer aimed to minimize the total cost of the coordinated frequency regulation of the frequency modulation generator and energy storage, and the lower model considered the minimum cost of system network loss and voltage regulation penalty for energy storage site selection and capacity. In [99], the upper layer aimed to maximize the benefit, and the lower layer considered the capacity loss of the energy storage battery and optimized the allocation of energy storage with the goal of the largest on-site absorption rate of new energy.
Currently, with the penetration of a high proportion of new energy, the frequency and voltage of power grids have become unstable, causing a sharp increase in the operating pressure. As a result, in multiple application scenarios, it is particularly important to research the optimal allocation method of energy storage that considers the absorption and improvement of the capacity of a new energy storage power station to actively support the power grid. Furthermore, it is necessary to comprehensively consider the influence of factors such as the selection of the energy storage technology type and control strategy on the optimization configuration results.

4.3. Optimal Configuration of Energy Storage System on the User Side

From the perspective of users, battery energy storage systems with swift adjustment performance are typically used for peak–valley spread arbitrage and demand response. Demand response refers to utilizing pricing or other incentive mechanisms to motivate power users to adjust their load characteristics to meet power system operation requirements. To alleviate grid load, enhance user load management capabilities, and increase power supply reliability, users employ energy storage to charge during low grid loads and supply electricity during high loads. Time-of-use arbitrage is the most commonly used scenario for user-side energy storage. In [100], the difference between the power cost and the equivalent electricity price throughout the energy storage system’s entire life cycle was compared, and economic criteria for user-side energy storage to participate in time-sharing arbitrage were given. In [101], the applications of sodium–sulfur batteries and flywheel energy storage systems in the New York market were studied, and feasible arbitrage schemes were proposed, highlighting the strong economic prospects for energy storage systems in energy arbitrage applications.
Several scholars have conducted relevant research on the value of energy storage systems in reducing users’ electricity costs. In [102], an energy storage system of industrial users with wind turbines was optimized using a multichannel iterative particle swarm optimization algorithm to minimize the users’ monthly electricity cost and obtain the optimal charging/discharging strategy and energy storage scale. In [103], a dynamic programming method was used to optimize the scale and operation strategy of energy storage to maximize the net income generated by the battery energy storage system used for load regulation.
In recent years, to maximize users’ investment income, multi-scenario joint operation optimization of user-side energy storage has gradually attracted widespread attention from academia and industry. Grouping energy storage systems so that different groups of energy storage undertake different functions is an effective means of realizing the simultaneous participation of energy storage systems in multiple profit models. Additionally, considering the decoupling of periods, operating energy storage at different times can assume different functions [104]. Most research chooses to build a unified comprehensive economic operation model of energy storage from the perspective of multi-scenario and multi-time coupling. In [105], a scheduling strategy for user-side energy storage to participate in frequency regulation and reduce the peak load of users at the same time was proposed, taking the cumulative maximum demand as the daily state variable and considering the impact of monthly demand electricity costs, using the German electricity market as an example. In [106], a nested model of energy storage operation based on dynamic programming was established, solving the problem of different time scales participating in frequency regulation and electricity price arbitrage through sub-models of different optimization time domains. In [107], a two-stage optimization model integrating time-sharing arbitrage, demand management, and grid frequency regulation was proposed, deciding the declared capacity, maximum demand threshold, and optimal SOC trajectory of energy storage on the target day in the pre-day stage, and dispatching energy storage output in real time in the intraday stage, while tracking the previous trajectory as much as possible to ensure that the peak load does not exceed the limit.

4.4. Energy Storage System Deployment Planning Approaches

In the world of energy storage application planning, the literature predominantly has employed mathematical modeling, which can vary greatly depending on the different value aspects considered, the varying constraints, and the number of periods divided. As a result, solution methods can differ vastly and mainly include conventional optimization algorithms, heuristic algorithms, hybrid optimization algorithms, and AI-based technologies, as reviewed and classified in this paper. The classification is shown in Figure 6.
(1)
Conventional optimization algorithm
Conventional optimization algorithms theoretically guarantee optimal solutions, but they often require the strict expression of the objective function and constraints, limiting their adaptability. The most popular mathematical technique with an ideal theory and solution is linear programming, which boasts an ability to handle complex problems, straightforward calculations, and quick resolution times. However, modeling the actual problem through a linear description can introduce significant inaccuracies, which is why linear programming is only used in the literature [67]. Nonlinear programming methods have been widely used to more accurately describe the actual problem and establish an accurate model of the problem. A nonlinear constraint programming model associated with the K-T condition was solved using the traditional Lagrange multiplier method in [73], and researchers used GAMS software to solve a nonlinear programming model with constraints in a study [87]. Nonlinear programming methods are computationally intensive and take a long time to calculate, necessitating the decomposition of the problem when applying large-scale systems. Dynamic programming methods are an effective means to study the optimal solution of a multi-stage decision-making process, which considers discrete variables and random factors with no strict restrictions on the objective function and constraints. The solution steps are clear, and it is easy to find the global optimal solution. Hence, dynamic optimization methods are widely used in related research, as found in the literature [103,106]. However, one of the limitations of dynamic optimization methods is that when the number of state variables in the model increases, the number of dimensions also sharply increases.
(2)
Heuristic optimization algorithm
In the realm of energy storage application planning, the literature has mostly utilized mathematical modeling. However, due to the complexities and nuances involved in the energy storage problem, heuristic algorithms are becoming increasingly popular, as they do not require explicit mathematical formulas and are suitable for multi-objective optimization problems. These algorithms utilize artificial intelligence methods to determine the optimal size and location of energy storage systems. One such algorithm is the particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA), which are effective for energy storage placement problems. For instance, multi-channel iterative PSO was used in [102] to determine the optimal charge/discharge strategy and energy storage scale. Additionally, a genetic algorithm was utilized in [68] to solve a multi-objective optimization model and examine the optimal efficiency and capacity of energy storage systems. It is important to note that while heuristic algorithms offer more flexibility than mathematical optimization methods, they come at the expense of solution accuracy, as they do not guarantee the global optimum and may instead fall into a local optimum.
(3)
Hybrid optimization algorithm
As the complexity of power grids continues to increase, a single algorithm is often not enough to solve the problem of energy storage distribution. Hybrid algorithms combine the benefits of various optimization strategies while overcoming the limitations of a single approach. For instance, the GA has the opposite features of PSO, which has a quick search speed and high local search capability but weak global search capability. In [108], these two algorithms were merged to overcome these limitations and offer a quick and reliable worldwide search capability. The generalized Benders decomposition (GBD) approach was combined with second-order cone programming (SOCP) relaxation to prevent becoming stuck in the local optima and achieved great computation efficiency [109]. This resulted in the best solution for the ESS size, placement, number, and operation. Hence, compared to a single method, hybrid optimization algorithms can tackle more complicated problems with a faster convergence speed and better solution quality. Thus, as the complexity of the algorithm rises, some investigations have turned to hybrid optimization algorithms.
(4)
The application of AI-based technologies in ESS planning and control
Evaluation indicators and the application of AI-based technologies are discussed in [101,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129]. With the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology, many AI techniques have been applied to ESS in smart grids, which are important for ESS in smart grids. In an energy storage-enabled smart grid, in the planning phase, AI can optimize energy storage configurations and develop appropriate selection schemes, thereby enhancing the system inertia and power quality and reducing construction costs. In terms of energy storage planning, the study [122] proposed the use of fuzzy logic algorithms to optimize the energy storage capacity, quantity, and charging/discharging time, effectively reducing the investment and operational costs of microgrids. Reference [123] utilized a multilayer perceptron to optimize the capacity and placement of energy storage, thereby improving the voltage/power distribution of the system and reducing the overall cost of the microgrid. Reference [124] applied lightweight neural networks and Q-learning methods to quantitatively evaluate the state of health (SOH) of energy storage batteries. Based on this evaluation, it optimized the energy storage capacity and charging/discharging rules, considering both the economic aspect and battery lifespan of the microgrid. This approach enhanced the operational performance of the microgrid. However, it did not consider the impact of renewable energy sources and load variations.
In recent years, the emerging deep reinforcement learning algorithms have provided new perspectives for handling complex microgrid control in terms of coordinated control and energy management of the energy storage. Reference [125] applied the deep Q-network (DQN) algorithm to implement energy storage scheduling strategies for microgrids. It also utilized deep convolutional neural networks to extract temporal information features for microgrid scheduling, aiming to maximize the operational benefits of the microgrid. Reference [126], in the context of microgrids with multiple heterogeneous battery types, employed the DQN to control the charging and discharging cycles of different battery systems, thus improving the operational efficiency of the microgrid. However, for a large number of batteries with significantly different characteristics, this method may require additional computation time. Reference [127] proposed an improved DQN model to guide the dynamic scheduling of energy storage in microgrids. It employed a Monte Carlo tree search to estimate the maximum action value expected by the DQN and embedded some scheduling rules within the DQN to guide the training process. Reference [128] utilized the DQN to develop optimal operational strategies for energy storage systems in microgrids under grid-connected and islanding modes. In the grid-connected mode, the objective is to maximize profits, while in islanding mode, the aim was to minimize the overall system’s unmet load. Apart from reinforcement learning, the existing research has demonstrated the applicability of various artificial intelligence methods for energy storage control in microgrids. Reference [129] proposed a fuzzy logic algorithm combined with an attention mechanism, which can quickly and accurately mitigate bus power fluctuations while protecting the energy storage system. This approach improved the economic and reliability aspects of the microgrid. Reference [130] introduced a deep belief network-based method for assessing the power quality of energy storage-enabled microgrids.
The breakthrough development of AI technology has brought transformative impacts on the development, operation, and modes of operation of energy storage in smart grids. It has also become one of the forward-looking research directions in the field of smart grids. The future prospects and research directions of AI in energy storage technology require further exploration.

5. Evaluation of the Benefits of Energy Storage System Applications

The evaluation of energy storage systems is a complex task that requires the consideration of various indicators and factors. Research in this field has focused on the electricity market and incentive policies, aiming to evaluate the economic benefits of energy storage. However, the evaluation process is far from straightforward, as it involves the analysis of numerous functions and parameters. This section mainly reviews the benefit evaluation of energy storage systems from the perspectives of evaluation indicators and evaluation methods.

5.1. Evaluation Indicators

In terms of evaluating indicators, the studies by [110,111,112] have identified several key functions of energy storage, such as low charge and high discharge, backup power supply, frequency regulation auxiliary services, and delayed power grid upgrading. These functions have been used to establish an economic benefit calculation method. Additionally, the study by [113] considered multiple aspects, including application demand, technology maturity, environmental protection, economy, installation location, and investment cost, when selecting evaluation indicators. The study by [114] proposed a multi-index comprehensive evaluation method that considered economy, reliability, and load smoothness. From a technical and economic perspective, the study by [115] established a numerical simulation model for the optimal operation of a wind–solar-storage independent power supply system, aiming to obtain the best power structure and energy storage capacity of the system. Moreover, some studies have compared the economics of different energy storage technologies. For instance, the study by [116] calculated the annual rate of return of vanadium battery and sodium–sulfur battery energy storage systems to maximize the revenue of spread arbitrage ancillary services. The study by [101] evaluated the economics of sodium–sulfur battery energy storage and flywheel energy storage under different operation schemes, considering low storage, high arbitrage, and frequency regulation income. In addition, the study by [117] studied the economic benefits of compressed air energy storage under different optimized dispatching operation modes and business models to maximize the benefits of the day-ahead market and the real-time balanced market.

5.2. Evaluation Methodology

When it comes to evaluation methods, there are various approaches, such as the multi-attribute decision-making method, the fuzzy evaluation method, and the gray association method. However, most of these methods are based on a single approach in practical application and are combined with other methods to achieve combined improvement. The differences among the applications of comprehensive evaluation methods in different fields are mainly reflected in three aspects: research parameters, empowerment methods, and evaluation methods. For instance, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation requires the selection of evaluation parameters and weight calculation methods, which include subjective calculation and objective calculation. The studies by [118,119,120] used expert subjective empowerment, but without testing the expert score. Among these, the studies by [119,120] respectively used the validity coefficient and multiplicative synthesis to achieve subjective and objective combination empowerment. However, this approach can lead to important indicators being ignored. Additionally, the selection of membership function is critical, and common determination methods are the intuition method, fuzzy statistical method, and fuzzy distribution method [121].

6. Discussion and Conclusions

As renewable energy is being integrated into grids on a larger scale, it has become increasingly difficult to match generation, transmission, distribution, and use in space and time. This has made energy storage technology a focal point in current power grid development. In the quest for solutions, the existing literature has mostly adopted mathematical modeling, but some issues remain. When conducting smart grid energy storage planning, the following directions are worth considering in subsequent research:
(1)
Urgent attention must be given to building a power-based and energy-based energy storage technology system. The characteristics of power, capacity, life, and cost of energy storage technology must be sorted out, and the complementarity and adaptability between energy storage technologies and renewable energy should be analyzed to form perfect technical standards. Different energy storage technologies have their strengths and weaknesses, and their advantages can be fully utilized to achieve hybrid energy storage.
(2)
In the energy storage planning model, a bi-level planning model that combines planning and operation should be used to consider numerous factors such as new energy output uncertainty, economy, environmental protection, and technology. While this model considers the problem more comprehensively, it also makes the solution more complicated, so the focus should be on researching the bi-level planning model.
(3)
Energy storage technology can be applied to the user side to achieve demand-side management, but when the scale of energy storage application in the power consumption link is large, it can have a significant impact on the peak and valley electricity prices. This can affect the economy of the energy storage device and even lead to investment recovery risks. Therefore, the overall planning and research of the scale of energy storage in the power grid should be strengthened.
(4)
Intelligent energy storage management and control: Studying intelligent management and control strategies for energy storage, including optimizing the scheduling, energy flow management, and capacity planning of storage systems, should be carried out to achieve stable operation and optimal energy utilization in smart grids.
(5)
Energy storage economics and policy research: Analyzing the economics of energy storage technologies, studying their cost-effectiveness, business models, and policy support mechanisms should be carried out. Additionally, the development of adaptive policies to promote the deployment and adoption of energy storage technologies and enhance the development of energy storage markets should be researched.
(6)
To enhance the configuration efficiency of energy storage in smart grids, a software platform can be developed that integrates the simulation of new energy generation scenarios, energy storage system selection, the optimization of energy storage configuration, and the economic evaluation of energy storage systems. This platform will provide a theoretical foundation for practical engineering construction.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.L. and S.Y.; methodology, F.L. and S.Y.; software, F.L. and S.Y.; validation, F.L. and S.Y.; formal analysis, F.L., S.Y. and K.S.; investigation, F.L. and S.Y.; resources, F.L. and S.Y.; data curation, F.L., S.Y. and D.W.; writing—original draft preparation, F.L. and S.Y.; writing—review and editing, F.L., S.Y., D.L., Z.L., H.Y. and J.Q. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received funding from the Science and Technology Project of the State Grid Corporation of China (a study on power grid transient stability support capability evaluation and enhancement methods under high penetration of renewable energy, 5108-202218280A-2-280-XG).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Science and Technology Project of State Grid Corporation of China (a study on power grid transient stability support capability evaluation and enhancement methods under high penetration of renewable energy, 5108-202218280A-2-280-XG). In the process of replying to the review comments, the paper received great support from Xing Yong from the Northwest Electric Power Design Institute Co, Ltd. of the China Power Engineering Consulting Group and Zhang De from the State Grid Hunan Electric Power Company Limited Economic and Technical Research Institute, and I would like to express my heartfelt thanks to both of them.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Qin, B.Y.; Liu, W.S.; Li, H.Y.; Ding, T.; Ma, K.; Liu, T.Q. Impact of system inherent characteristics on initial-stage short-circuit current of MMC-based MTDC transmission systems. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2022, 37, 3913–3922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Shafiullah, G.; Arif, M.T.; Oo, A.M. Mitigation strategies to minimize potential technical challenges of renewable energy integration. Sustain. Energy Techn. 2018, 25, 24–42. [Google Scholar]
  3. Qin, B.Y.; Sun, H.Y.; Ma, J.; Li, W.; Ding, T.; Wang, Z.J.; Albert, Y. Zomaya. Robust H∞ control of doubly fed wind generator via state-dependent riccati equation technique. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2019, 34, 2390–2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shi, L.L.; Jia, Q.Q.; Lin, L.J.; Wang, N.; Tian, G. Distributed Global Optimal Harmonic Mitigation Strategy for Power Electronics High Penetrated Distribution Networks. Proc. CSEE 2020, 40, 2914–2924. [Google Scholar]
  5. Meersman, B.; Renders, B.; Degroote, L.; Vandoorn, T.; Vandevelde, L. Three-phase inverter-connected DG-units and voltage unbalance. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2011, 81, 899–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Jamal, T.; Shafiullah, G.; Carter, C.; Urmee, T. A comprehensive techno-economic and power quality analysis of a remote PV-diesel system in Australia. Renew. Energy Environ. Sustain. 2017, 2, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xu, Y.; Li, C.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, N.; Peng, B. Load frequency control of a novel renewable energy integrated micro-grid containing pumped hydropower energy storage. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 29067–29077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhou, R.; Zhong, J. Impacts of distributed renewable energy generations on smart grid operation and dispatch. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA, 22–26 July 2012; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  9. Das, T.; Roy, R.; Mandal, K.K. Impact of the penetration of distributed generation on optimal reactive power dispatch. Protect. Control. Mod. Power Syst. 2020, 5, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Qin, B.Y.; Wang, W.; Li, W.; Li, F.; Ding, T. Multiobjective Energy Management of Multiple Pulsed Loads in Shipboard Integrated Power Systems. IEEE Syst. J. 2023, 17, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nguyen, H.K.; Song, J.B.; Han, Z. Distributed demand side management with energy storage in smart grid. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 2015, 26, 3346–3357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jiang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Tan, S.C.; Hui, Y.R. Distribution Power Loss Minimization of Energy Storage Systems in DC Microgrids Under FDI Attacks. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Detroit, MI, USA, 9–13 October 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yang, Y.; Tan, S.C.; Hui, S.Y.R. State-of-Charge Balance Control of Distributed Battery Systems with Distinct State-of-Health in DC Microgrids. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE/IAS Industrial and Commercial Power System Asia (I&CPS Asia), Chengdu, China, 18–21 July 2021; pp. 140–144. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jiang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Tan, S.C.; Hui, S.Y.R. Dual-Ascent Hierarchical Control-Based Distribution Power Loss Reduction of Parallel-Connected Distributed Energy Storage Systems in DC Microgrids. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Ind. Electron. 2023, 4, 137–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Luo, N.; Li, J.L. Research Progress of Energy Storage Technology in Power System. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2012, 28, 71–79. [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, X.R.; Huang, J.Y.; Chen, Y.Y.; Liu, W.J. Review on large-scale involvement of energy storage in power grid fast frequency regulation. Power Syst. Prot. Control. 2016, 44, 145–153. [Google Scholar]
  17. Luo, X.; Wang, J.H.; Ma, Z. Overview of energy storage technologies and their application prospects in smart grid. Smart Grid 2014, 2, 7–12. [Google Scholar]
  18. Mei, S.W.; Xue, X.D.; Chen, L.J. Discussion on compressed air energy storage technology and its application. South. Power Syst. Technol. 2016, 10, 11–15. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ye, J.L.; Xue, J.H.; Wang, W.; Wu, F.B.; Yang, B. Application of energy storage technology and its prospect in power system. Electr. Power 2014, 47, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang, C.M.; Sun, W.Q.; Yi, T.; Yan, Z.M.; Zhang, Y. Review on energy storage application planning and benefit evaluation methods in smart grid. Proc. CSEE 2013, 33, 33–41. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, B.F.; Tong, B.; Feng, Y.M.; Liu, Q.Y.; Zhao, Y. Application analysis of electrochemical energy storage technology in new energy power generation side. Therm. Power Gener. 2020, 49, 13–18. [Google Scholar]
  22. Shi, L.J.; Chen, Z.; Wang, H.F. Damping of power system low-frequency oscillations with FESS. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 2010, 34, 29–33. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wang, L.; Chen, S.S.; Lee, W.J. Dynamic stability enhancement and power flow control of a hybrid wind and marine-current farm using SMES. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2009, 24, 626–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ali, M.H.; Murata, T.; Tamura, J. Transient stability enhancement by fuzzy logic-controlled SMES considering coordination with optimal reclosing of circuit breakers. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2009, 45, 1045–1051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liang, L.; Li, P.M.; Liu, J.N.; Zhan, C.L.; Li, B. Study on the control strategy of pumped storage power station for frequency regulation. High Volt. Eng. 2015, 41, 3288–3295. [Google Scholar]
  26. Guo, Z.G.; Ma, X.Y.; Lei, J.Y.; Yuan, Z.Y. Review on demonstration progress and commercial application scenarios of compressed air energy storage system. South. Energy Constr. 2019, 6, 17–26. [Google Scholar]
  27. Sun, B.B.; Yang, S.L.; Liu, Z.Q.; Li, T.T. analysis on present application of megawat-scale energy storage in frequency regulation and its enlightenment. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 2017, 41, 8–16. [Google Scholar]
  28. Li, J.L.; Wu, Y.W.; Wang, N.; Xiong, J.J.; Ma, S.L. review and prospect of gigawatt-level electrochemical energy storage power station. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 2021, 45, 2–14. [Google Scholar]
  29. Xu, S.P.; Li, X.J.; Hui, D. A survey of the development and demonstration application of largescale energy storage. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2013, 29, 94–100. [Google Scholar]
  30. Arani, A.K.; Karami, H.; Gharehpetian, G.B. Review of flywheel energy storage systems structures and applications in power systems and microgrids. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, J.L.; Yuan, X.D.; Yu, Z.G.; Ge, L. Comments on power quality enhancement research for power grid by energy storage system. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 2019, 43, 15–24. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, H.J.; Jiang, Q.Y. An overview of control and configuration of energy storage system used for wind power fluctuation mitigation. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 2014, 38, 126–135. [Google Scholar]
  33. Sun, Y.S.; Yang, M.; Shi, C.L.; Jia, D.Q.; Pei, W.; Sun, L.J. Analysis of Application Status and Development Trend of Energy Storage. High Volt. Eng. 2020, 46, 80–89. [Google Scholar]
  34. Hu, Z.C.; Ding, H.J.; Song, Y.H.; Zhang, F. Research status and prospect of energy storage application under energy internet background. Electr. Power Constr. 2016, 37, 8–17. [Google Scholar]
  35. Jing, P.; Xu, G.Z.; Zhao, B.; Yang, C.Y.; Wang, L.; Jin, Y.; Xiao, Y. Large-scale energy storage technology for global energy internet. Smart Grid 2015, 3, 486–492. [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang, Z.B.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Z.Z. Application and development of energy storage devices for substation. Power Sources 2012, 36, 1414–1417. [Google Scholar]
  37. Su, X.L.; Li, D.D.; Yan, X.X.; Tan, Y.X. application analysis of energy storage technology in power system. Electr. Power Constr. 2016, 37, 24–32. [Google Scholar]
  38. Tian, H.Y.; Chi, F.; Qi, X.M.; Shi, S.S.; Fang, C. Development of energy storage technology and application prospects in urban power grid. Power Energy 2018, 39, 867–871. [Google Scholar]
  39. Liu, S.L.; Wen, J.Y.; Sun, H.S.; Cheng, S.J. Progress on applications of energy storage technology in wind power integrated to the grid. Power Syst. Prot. Control. 2013, 41, 145–153. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ma, S.Y.; Li, J.C.; Duan, C.; Wu, J.; Xu, T.; Chen, H.F.; Pan, W.X.; Yan, H.M. Joint operation optimization of wind-photovoltaic-pumped hydro storage based on electricity market. New Energy 2019, 47, 43–49. [Google Scholar]
  41. Li, X.J.; Wang, S.X.; Hui, D. Summary and prospect of operation control and application method for battery energy storage systems. Power Syst. Technol. 2017, 41, 3315–3325. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kou, L.F.; Zhang, Y.; Ji, Y.; Wu, M.; Xiong, X.; Hu, C.D. Typical application scenario and operation mode analysis of distributed energy storage. Power Syst. Prot. Control. 2020, 48, 177–187. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ding, M.; Chen, Z.; Su, J.H.; Chen, Z.; Wu, J.F.; Zhu, C.Z. An overview of battery energy storage system for renewable energy generation. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 2013, 37, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhen, X.Y.; Yin, Z.D.; Sun, Z. Application and perspective of advanced energy storage technology in smart grid. Electr. Age 2011, 1, 44–47. [Google Scholar]
  45. Hein, K.; Xu, Y.; Wilson, G.; Gupta, A.K. Coordinated optimal voyage planning and energy management of all-electric ship with hybrid energy storage system. IEEE Trans. Power Syst 2021, 36, 2355–2365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Yu, Z.H. Status and development of bulk energy storage technology. China Power Enterp. Manag. 2009, 7, 26–28. [Google Scholar]
  47. Hannan, M.A.; Hoque, M.M.; Mohamed, A.; Ayob, A. Review of energy storage systems for electric vehicle applications: Issues and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 771–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Choi, W.; Wu, Y.J.; Han, D.; Gorman, J.; Palavivino, P.C.; Lee, W.; Sarlioglu, B. Reviews on grid-connected inverter, utility-scaled battery energy storage system, and vehicle-to-grid application-challenges and opportunities. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), Chicago, IL, USA, 22–24 June 2017; pp. 203–210. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zeng, J. Construction and Control of Energy Storage Systems Used in Renewable Energy and Micro Grid; Huazhong University of Science and Technology: Wuhan, China, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  50. Mei, J.; Zhang, J.; Liu, S.Y.; Qiu, L.C. Development status of battery energy storage technology. Zhejiang Electr. Power 2020, 39, 75–81. [Google Scholar]
  51. Zakeri, B.; Syri, S. Electrical energy storage systems: A comparative life cycle cost analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 42, 569–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ma, X.; Zhang, H.; Sun, C. An optimal strategy of electrolyte flow rate for vanadium redox flow battery. J. Power Sources 2012, 203, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Palizban, O.; Kauhaniemi, K. Energy storage systems in modern grids-Matrix of technologies and applications. J. Energy Storage 2016, 6, 248–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Yao, L.Z.; Yang, B.; Cui, H.F.; Zhuang, J.; Ye, J.L.; Xue, J.H. Challenges and progresses of energy storage technology and its application in power systems. J. Mod. Power Syst. Clean Energy 2013, 4, 519–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Electrical Energy Storage; White Paper; The International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC): Geneva, Switzerland, 2011.
  56. Tokoro, H.; Yoshikiyo, M.; Imoto, K.; Namai, A.; Nasu, T.; Nakagawa, K.; Ozaki, N.; Hakoe, F.; Tanaka, K.; Chiba, K.; et al. External stimulation controllable heat-storage ceramics. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 7037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Anisur, M.A.; Kibria, M.A.; Mahfuz, M.H.; Metselaar, I.; Saidur, R. Latent heat thermal storage (LHTS) for energy sustainability. Green Energy Technol 2015, 201, 245–263. [Google Scholar]
  58. Zheng, W.; Zhu, J.; Luo, Q. Distributed Dispatch of Integrated Electricity-Heat Systems With Variable Mass Flow. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2023, 14, 1907–1919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Wen, Y.; Qu, X.; Li, W.; Liu, X.; Ye, X. Synergistic Operation of Electricity and Natural Gas Networks via ADMM. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 9, 4555–4565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Anosov, V.N.; Yaroslavtsev, M.V. Evaluation of hybrid electric bus energy storage device capacity. In Proceedings of the 2016 11th International Forum on Strategic Technology (IFOST), Novosibirsk, Russia, 1–3 June 2016; pp. 65–67. [Google Scholar]
  61. Hemmati, R.; Saboori, H. Emergence of hybrid energy storage systems in renewable energy and transport applications-A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 65, 11–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Martinez, M.; Molina, M.G.; Frack, F.; Mercado, P.E. Dynamic modeling, simulation and control of hybrid energy storage system based on compressed air and supercapacitors. IEEE Lat. Amer. Trans. 2013, 11, 466–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liang, H.-W.R.; Yang, Y.; Hui, S.Y.R. Improvement of lithium-ion battery charging from the state-of-the-art industrial JEITA guidelines to a hybrid temperature-regulated current control. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2022, 37, 6412–6423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, W.C.; Liang, X.H.; Wang, S. SiO2 hydrophilic modification of expanded graphite to fabricate form-stable ternary nitrate composite room temperature phase change material for thermal energy storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 413, 127549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Reji, K.R.; Samykano, M.; Pandey, A.K. A comparative study on thermophysical properties of functionalized and non- functionalized multi- walled carbon nano tubes (MWCNTs) enhanced salt hydrate phase change material. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2022, 240, 111697. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yu, K.Y.; Liu, Y.S.; Yang, Y.Z. Review on form- stable inorganic hydrated salt phase change materials: Preparation, characterization and effect on the thermophysical properties. Appl. Energy 2021, 292, 116845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Leou, R.C. An economic analysis model for the energy storage systems in a deregulated market. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies, Singapore, 24–27 November 2008; pp. 744–749. [Google Scholar]
  68. Chacra, F.A.; Bastard, P.; Fleury, G.; Clavreul, R. Impact of energy storage costs on economical performance in a distribution substation. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 2005, 20, 684–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Yi, C.Y.; Hu, Z.J.; Lin, W.W. Cooperative planning method of distributed generation and independent energy storage in active distribution network based on Stackelberg game. Electr. Meas. Instrum. 2022, 13, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  70. He, C.K.; Zhu, J.Z.; Liu, Y. Coordinated planning of electric vehicle Charging-Swapping-Storage integrated station and active distribution network considering carbon reduction. Trans. China Electrotech. Soc. 2022, 37, 92–111. [Google Scholar]
  71. Yang, X.Y.; Liu, X.Y.; Guo, Q.; Sun, Y.; Yan, G.G.; Li, H.Y. Coordinated Planning of Energy Storage and Flexible Retrofit of Thermal Power Units Considering Ancillary Service Income. Power Syst. Technol. 2023, 47, 1350–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zhao, S.Q.; Wu, Y.; Lu, Z.W. Analysis of power system peaking capacity and economy considering uncertainty of wind and solar output. Power Syst. Technol. 2022, 46, 1752–1761. [Google Scholar]
  73. Shunichi, K.; Eiichi, T.; Hiroyuki, K.; Jun, H.; Takashi, S. Life cycle assessment and economical evaluation of superconducting magnetic energy storage systems in a power system. Electr. Eng. Jpn. 2000, 131, 32–44. [Google Scholar]
  74. Zhu, X.R.; Shan, Y.Q. Multi-stage distributionally robust planning of energy storage capacity considering flexibility. Electr. Power Autom. Equip. 2023, 37, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  75. Zhang, Y.X.; Liu, W.Y.; Li, X. Optimal control method of peak load regulation combined concentrating solar power and thermal power for power grid accessed with high proportion of renewable energy. Electr. Power Autom. Equip. 2021, 41, 8–15. [Google Scholar]
  76. Xiang, Y.P.; Wei, Z.D.; Sun, G.Q.; Sun, Y.H.; Shen, M.P. Life cycle cost based optimal configuration of battery energy storage system in distribution network. Power Syst. Technol. 2015, 39, 264–270. [Google Scholar]
  77. Zheng, J.; Wen, F.S.; Li, L.; Wang, K.; Gao, C. Transmission system expansion planning considering combined operation of wind farms and energy storage systems. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 2013, 37, 35–142. [Google Scholar]
  78. Xiu, X.Q.; Tang, W.; Li, J.L.; Tian, C.G. Collaborative configuration of distributed generation, energy storage and load in microgrid considering state of health. High Volt. Eng. 2017, 43, 3118–3126. [Google Scholar]
  79. Yu, Q.H.; Tian, L.; Li, X.F.; Li, X.D.; Tan, X. Configuration and economic assessment of compressed air energy surveying of wind energy uncertainty. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 1614–1623. [Google Scholar]
  80. Zhang, D.L.; Mubaarak, S.; Jiang, S.Y.; Wang, L.Z.; Liu, J.X. Optimized configuration method of energy storage system in photovoltaic power station based on probability of power. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2021, 10, 2244–2251. [Google Scholar]
  81. Du, G.; Zhao, D.M.; Liu, X. Summary of the research of wind power uncertainty optimization scheduling. In Proceedings of the Chinese Society for Electrical Engineering, Jinan, China, 21–22 September 2023; pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  82. Yang, L.B.; Cao, Y.; Wei, H.; Chen, L.J.; Mei, S.W. Formation of wind power uncertainty and abandoning wind rate constraints. Power Syst. Autom. 2020, 44, 45–52. [Google Scholar]
  83. Dai, L. Stochastic Robust Optimization Method for Considering New Energy Uncertainty; Zhejiang University: Hangzhou, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  84. Zhang, Y.J.; Zhang, Y.H.; Liu, S.L.; Yi, Y.Q. Dual planning of a distribution transformer considering distributed photovoltaic and energy storage access. Power Syst. Prot. Control. 2020, 48, 9–15. [Google Scholar]
  85. Ren, D.W.; Jin, C.; Hou, J.M.; Xiao, J.Y.; Du, E.S.; Zhou, Y.B. New energy configuration inscription replacement of new energy configuration based on timing operation. Electr. Power 2021, 54, 18–26. [Google Scholar]
  86. Jia, H.; Peng, J.Q.; Li, N.P.; Zhou, C.F.; Yin, R.X. Optimization and economical analysis of distributed PV energy storage system under dynamic electric price. Acta Energ. Sol. Sin. 2021, 42, 187–193. [Google Scholar]
  87. Liliana, E.B.; Pablo, C.B.; Cornelis van Kooten, G. The economics of wind power with energy storage. Energy Econ. 2008, 30, 1973–1989. [Google Scholar]
  88. Ren, R.R.; Xie, L.R.; Xu, B.F.; Zhen, H.; Wang, K.F. Research on capacity optimization configuration of discarded light resistance. J. Xinjiang Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2021, 38, 632–640. [Google Scholar]
  89. Chen, C.W.; Jiang, X.H.; Liu, L.J. Research on distributed power supply optimization configuration considering timing and intention. Electr. Eng. 2017, 6, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhu, W.; Lan, Y.P.; Zhen, Z.; Liu, B.; Feng, W.X.; Zhou, S. Research on the optimization operation of wind and discipline multi-energy complementation system. Power Syst. Prot. Control. 2019, 47, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  91. Yan, N.; Zhang, H.Y.; Wang, Z.Q.; Xu, J.; Cheng, J.H.; Gao, R.G.; Zhao, J.P. Regional power grid distributed social selection orientation planning. High Press. Electr. 2020, 56, 52–58. [Google Scholar]
  92. Li, Z.K.; Chen, S.Y.; Fu, Y.; Dong, C.M.; Zhang, J.W. Optimal allocation of ESS in distribution network containing DG base on timing-voltage-sensitivity analysis. Proc. CSEE 2017, 37, 4630–4640. [Google Scholar]
  93. Guo, Y.H.; Yu, D.; Yang, P.; Wang, Z.J.; Wang, J.T. Optimal capacity allocation method of a distributed energy storage system based on greedy algorithm. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2022, 11, 2295–2304. [Google Scholar]
  94. Yuan, W.; Wang, C.X.; Li, Q.H.; Shi, Z.Y. Multi-area two-stage optimal allocation method of large-scale energy storage for renewable energy consumption. J. Glob. Energy Interconnect. 2021, 4, 393–400. [Google Scholar]
  95. Ding, M.; Fang, D.; Liu, X.F.; Pan, J.; Zhang, J.J. Optimal siting and sizing of distributed PV-storage in distribution network based on cluster partition. Proc. CSEE 2019, 39, 2187–2201. [Google Scholar]
  96. Yuan, T.J.; Jiang, P.; Sun, Y.Q.; Mei, S.W.; Alimasibieke, S. Research on bi-level capacity programming optimization for the integration of wind farm energy storage power station. High Volt. Eng. 2015, 41, 3204–3212. [Google Scholar]
  97. Tao, Q.; Sang, B.Y.; Ye, J.L.; Xuan, J.H. Optimal configuration method of distributed energy storage systems in distribution network with high penetration of photovoltaic. High Volt. Eng. 2016, 42, 2158–2165. [Google Scholar]
  98. Meng, Q.Q.; Li, X.Q.; Yu, H.F.; Li, X.R.; Li, P.Q.; Jiang, X. Optimal planning of energy storage power station considering source-charge uncertainty. Acta Energ. Sol. Sin. 2021, 42, 415–423. [Google Scholar]
  99. Jiang, X.B.; Tang, B.; Yu, G.Z.; Hu, P.F.; Xia, X.W.; Xu, L.J. Coordination and optimization method of park-level energy storage and electricity price for local accommodation of renewable energy. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 2022, 46, 51–64. [Google Scholar]
  100. Shen, H.M.; Yu, X.H. Economic analysis of distributed electrochemical energy storage on the user-side. Zhejiang Electr. Power 2019, 38, 50–54. [Google Scholar]
  101. Rahul, W.; Jay, A.; Rick, M. Economics of electric energy storage for energy arbitrage and regulation in New York. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 2558–2568. [Google Scholar]
  102. Lee, T.Y. Operating schedule of battery energy storage system in a time-of-use rate industrial user with wind turbine generators: A multipass iteration particle swarm optimization approach. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 2007, 22, 774–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Oudalov, A.; Cherkaoui, R.; Beguin, A. Sizing and optimal operation of battery energy storage system for peak shaving application. In Proceedings of the IEEE Lausanne Powertech, Lausanne, Switzerland, 1–5 July 2007; pp. 621–625. [Google Scholar]
  104. Tian, Y.; Bera, A.; Benidris, M.; Mitra, J. Stacked revenue and technical benefits of a grid-connected energy storage system. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 54, 3034–3043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Engels, J.; Claessens, B.; Deconinck, G. Optimal combination of frequency control and peak shaving with battery storage systems. IEEE Tran. Smart Grid 2020, 11, 3270–3279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Cheng, B.; Powell, W.B. Co-optimizing battery storage for the frequency regulation and energy arbitrage using multi-scale dynamic programming. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2018, 9, 1997–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Wang, Z.; Kirschen, D.S. Two-stage optimal scheduling for aggregators of batteries owned by commercial consumers. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2019, 13, 4880–4887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lei, J.; Gong, Q.; Liu, J.; Qiao, H.; Wang, B. Optimal allocation of a VRB energy storage system for wind power applications considering the dynamic efficiency and life of VRB in active distribution networks. IET Renew. Power Gener. 2019, 13, 563–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lin, Z.; Hu, Z.; Zhang, H.; Song, Y. Optimal ESS allocation in distribution network using accelerated generalised Benders decomposition. IET Gener. Transm. Distrib. 2019, 13, 2738–2746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Benedikt, L.; Hannes, W.; Dirk, U.S. Optimizing vehicle-to-grid charging strategies using genetic algorithms under the consideration of battery aging. In Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, Chicago, IL, USA, 6–9 September 2011; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  111. Lone, S.A.; Mufti, M.D. Integrating a Redox flow battery system with-a wind-diesel power system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems for Industrial Growth-2006, New Delhi, India, 12–15 December 2006; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  112. Waldmann, T.; Wilka, M.; Kasper, M.; Fleischhammer, M.; Wohlfahrt-Mehrens, M. Temperature dependent ageing mechanisms in lithium-ion batteries-a post-mortem study. J. Power Sources 2014, 262, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Lai, L.; Zhang, Y. Comprehensive evaluation of battery energy storage system. Power Energy 2012, 33, 68–71. [Google Scholar]
  114. Zheng, X.B. The Multi-Index Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Peak Load Shifting Using Battery Energy Storage System; North China Electric Power University: Beijing, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  115. Diaf, S.; Belhamel, M.; Haddadi, M.; Louche, A. Technical and economic assessment of hybrid photovoltaic/wind system with battery storage in Corsica island. Energy Policy 2008, 36, 743–754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Moghaddam, I.G.; Saeidian, A. Self scheduling program for a VRB energy storage in a competitive electricity market. In Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Power System Technology, Hangzhou, China, 24–28 October 2010; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  117. Xian, H.; Raphael, L.; Andrei, N.; Delarue, E.; Mercier, E. Com-Pressed Air Energy Storage multi-stream value assessment on the French energy market. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Trondheim PowerTech, Trondheim, Norway, 19–23 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
  118. Yang, Z.C.; Zhang, C.L.; Ge, L.; Gong, D.C.; Gu, Y.F.; Huang, T.H. Comprehensive fuzzy evaluation based on entropy weight method for insulator flashover pollution. Electr. Power Autom. Equip. 2014, 34, 90–94. [Google Scholar]
  119. Zeng, M.; Wang, L. Risk assessment of smart grid based on rank correlation analysis and gray triangle clustering. East China Electr. Power 2013, 41, 245–248. [Google Scholar]
  120. Li, H.H.; Xing, J.; Sun, Y.S.; Zhou, D.W.; Ma, T.; Zhang, J.W. Water quality assessment of drinking water sources of the yellow river main stem based on combination weighting fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. J. Hydroecology 2015, 36, 44–50. [Google Scholar]
  121. Liu, S.F.; Jeffery, Y.Y. A brief introduction to grey system theory. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 2012, 2, 89–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Mahmoud, T.S.; Ahmed, B.S.; Hassan, M.Y. The role of intelligent generation control algorithms in optimizing battery energy storage systems size in microgrids: A case study from Western Australia. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 196, 1335–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Rajamand, S.; Shafie-Khah, M.; Catalao, J.P.S. Energy storage systems implementation and photovoltaic output prediction for cost minimization of a Microgrid. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2022, 202, 107596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chen, S.; Li, J.; Jiang, C. Optimal energy storage configuration for microgrids based on SOH estimation and deep Q-network. Entropy 2022, 24, 630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wang, Y.D.; Cui, C.G.; Qian, S. Study on micro-grid energy storage dispatching strategy based on deep Q-value reinforcement learning. Renew. Energy Resour. 2019, 7, 1220–1228. [Google Scholar]
  126. Qiu, X.; Nguyen, T.A.; Crow, M.L. Heterogeneous energy storage optimization for microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2015, 7, 1453–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Shang, Y.; Wu, W.; Guo, J. Stochastic dispatch of energy storage in microgrids: An augmented reinforcement learning approach. Appl. Energy 2020, 261, 114423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Bui, V.H.; Hussain, A.; Kim, H.M. Q-learning-based operation strategy for community battery energy storage system (CBESS) in microgrid system. Energies 2019, 12, 1789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  129. Xing, Y. Research on Power Control Strategy of Microgrid Energy Storage System Based on Fuzzy Control; Jiangsu University: Zhenjiang, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  130. Yang, J. Research on Power Quality Assessment and Control in Microgrid Based on Battery Energy Storage; Northeastern University: Shenyang, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Detailed classifications of energy storage technologies.
Figure 1. Detailed classifications of energy storage technologies.
Sustainability 15 09584 g001
Figure 2. Structural diagram of an energy storage system connected to a public power grid.
Figure 2. Structural diagram of an energy storage system connected to a public power grid.
Sustainability 15 09584 g002
Figure 3. Value manifestation of energy storage in different scenarios.
Figure 3. Value manifestation of energy storage in different scenarios.
Sustainability 15 09584 g003
Figure 4. Classification of new energy storage application scenarios.
Figure 4. Classification of new energy storage application scenarios.
Sustainability 15 09584 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the energy storage planning model on the new energy side.
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the energy storage planning model on the new energy side.
Sustainability 15 09584 g005
Figure 6. Types of energy storage system deployment planning approaches.
Figure 6. Types of energy storage system deployment planning approaches.
Sustainability 15 09584 g006
Table 1. Challenges for smart grids and energy storage role analysis.
Table 1. Challenges for smart grids and energy storage role analysis.
Challenges for Smart GridsRole of Energy Storage
Short time scales
  • The power grid structure and power flow distribution are changed.
  • High penetration of renewable energy power generation will have a significant impact on the stability of small disturbance/transient power angle, voltage stability, and frequency stability.
Fast frequency adjustment
Suppresses low-frequency oscillations
Automatic generation control (AGC)
Smooths the fluctuation of new energy output
Overvoltage suppression
Short-term voltage stability
Automatic voltage control (AVC)
Harmonics and resonance suppression
Sub-synchronous/super-synchronous resonance suppression
Electrical energy quality control
New energy output plan tracking
Medium and long time scales
  • The adjustability and flexibility of the grid decrease.
  • The difficulty of balancing power and energy between the source and load increases.
  • It is increasingly difficult to achieve reliable and efficient operation of the power grid through traditional dispatching.
New energy output climbing control
Alleviates transmission and distribution equipment congestion
Peak shaving and valley filling
Participates in market regulation
Delays the expansion and upgrading of transmission and distribution
Works as a backup power source
Table 2. Characteristics of electrochemical energy storage technologies in smart grids [53].
Table 2. Characteristics of electrochemical energy storage technologies in smart grids [53].
TechnologyNameCapacity
(MWh)
Power
(MW)
Response TimeDischarge
Time
Lifetime
(Years)
Efficiency
(%)
ElectrochemicalLead–acid0.25–50 100 Millisecond 4   h 20 85
Lithium-ion0.25–25 100 1   h 15 90
Sodium–sulfur 300 50 6   h 15 80
Flow batteries 250 50 10   m i n 8   h 10 80
Table 3. The status quo of energy storage functions in smart grids.
Table 3. The status quo of energy storage functions in smart grids.
ESS TypeMechanical ESSElectrochemical ESSChemical ESSElectromagnetic ESSThermal ESS
Function Pumped Hydro StorageFlywheel ESSCompressed Air ESS (CAES)Lithium-Ion BatteriesLead–Acid BatteriesFlow BatteriesSodium–Sulfur BatteriesHydrogen Fuel CellSuperconducting Magnetic ESSSupercapacitor ESSLatent Heat Storage, Sensible Heat Storage
Power frequency active regulationShort time scalesFast frequency adjustment [15] [16,17] [18] [16,17] [16,19] [19] [20] [21]
Suppresses low-frequency oscillations [22] [23,24]
Automatic generation control (AGC) [25] [26] [27,28] [19,29]
Smooths the fluctuation of new energy output [30] [31] [17,32] [34] [35] [36] [17]
New energy output plan tracking [29,31] [29] [29] [66]
Medium and long time scalesNew energy output climbing control [29] [29] [29]
Alleviates transmission and distribution equipment congestion [37] [26,37] [38] [37]
Peak shaving and valley filling [15] [29] [33] [33] [29] [29,34] [64,65]
Participates in market regulation [40] [41]
Delays the expansion and upgrading of transmission and distribution [37,42] [26,37] [29] [29,43] [37]
Power frequency reactive power regulationShort time scalesOvervoltage suppression [29] [31]
Short-term voltage stability [31] [29] [31]
Automatic voltage control (AVC) [17] [28,35] [29] [29,41]
Non-power frequency regulationShort time scalesHarmonic and resonance suppression [39] [17]
Sub-synchronous/super-synchronous resonance suppression [29] [31]
Electrical energy quality control [29] [26] [29,41] [17] [29] [34] [29] [31]
Integrated energy system [58,59]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, F.; Wang, D.; Liu, D.; Yang, S.; Sun, K.; Liu, Z.; Yu, H.; Qin, J. A Comprehensive Review on Energy Storage System Optimal Planning and Benefit Evaluation Methods in Smart Grids. Sustainability 2023, 15, 9584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129584

AMA Style

Li F, Wang D, Liu D, Yang S, Sun K, Liu Z, Yu H, Qin J. A Comprehensive Review on Energy Storage System Optimal Planning and Benefit Evaluation Methods in Smart Grids. Sustainability. 2023; 15(12):9584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129584

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Fan, Dan Wang, Dong Liu, Songheng Yang, Ke Sun, Zhongjian Liu, Haoyang Yu, and Jishuo Qin. 2023. "A Comprehensive Review on Energy Storage System Optimal Planning and Benefit Evaluation Methods in Smart Grids" Sustainability 15, no. 12: 9584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129584

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop