Next Article in Journal
Local Climate Adaptation and Governance: The Utility of Joint SECAP Plans for Networks of Small–Medium Italian Municipalities
Next Article in Special Issue
Towards Sustainable Safe Driving: A Multimodal Fusion Method for Risk Level Recognition in Distracted Driving Status
Previous Article in Journal
Removal of Cs-137 from Liquid Alkaline High-Level Radwaste Simulated Solution by Sorbents of Various Classes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Optimization Method of Transfer Streamlines in Integrated Passenger Hubs Based on 3D Spatial Perspective
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatial Distribution Characteristic and Type Classification of Rural Settlements: A Case Study of Weibei Plain, China

1
School of Architecture, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China
2
Engineering Research Center of Collaborative Planning of Low-Carbon Urban Space and Transportation, Universities of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an 710061, China
3
Xi’an Rail Transit Group Company Limited, Xi’an 710016, China
4
Power China Guizhou Electric Power Engineering Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550081, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(11), 8736; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118736
Submission received: 13 April 2023 / Revised: 19 May 2023 / Accepted: 23 May 2023 / Published: 29 May 2023

Abstract

:
The continuous development of urbanization in China has brought new opportunities to rural settlements but has also led to spatial problems such as disorderly layout and unbalanced morphological structures, and the sustainable development of the countryside faces great challenges. As the core spatial carrier of rural settlements, scientific identification of their characteristics and delineation of their types is conducive to the subsequent spatial optimization of rural settlements to promote the coordinated and orderly development of rural areas. In recent years, several studies have explored the characteristics and classification of rural settlements based on single factor influences, but few studies have comprehensively considered them from a multidimensional perspective. To fill this gap, this paper takes the rural settlements in the Weibei Plain as the research object, uses the continuous spectral transect analysis method, combines the landscape security pattern analysis, establishes a multidimensional feature matrix model, quantitatively analyzes the spatial differentiation characteristics, and classifies the types. The key findings are as follows. (1) According to the analysis of landscape security patterns, it was divided into four types of rural settlements. The rural settlements with high and medium security patterns accounted for 86.79%, and the overall ecological adaptability was good. (2) In terms of spatial distribution, 80% of patches in the Weihe River transect are small and unevenly distributed under the influence of river runoff, gradually changing from dense to discrete; the fluctuation range of the 70% patch area is restricted by the terrain in the Hanyuan tableland transect is small and changes from discrete to dense. In terms of spatial morphology, 70% of the Weihe River transect was irregular and varied greatly. The morphology of the Hanyuan tableland transect tended to be similar, and the degree of fragmentation of the Hanyuan tableland transect was higher than that of the Weihe River transect. (3) The Weihe River transect was divided into six types of settlement space, the Hanyuan tableland transect was divided into seven types, and the characteristics of different settlement space types were quite different. The results can provide a scientific basis for the spatial planning, industrial guidance, and facility layout of rural settlements and have important significance for the rational formulation of spatial agglomeration guidance strategies and the promotion of sustainable rural development in China.

1. Introduction

In the context of China’s rural revitalization strategy and the requirement of establishing a territorial spatial planning system, in order to continue the spatial relationship of organic integration of humans and nature and promote the sustainable and synergistic development of human-living environments and ecological environments, it is necessary to strengthen the research and exploration of various territorial spatial elements and patterns [1,2]. A rural settlement, as an important space for residents outside the built-up areas of cities and towns, is an important fulcrum for realizing the strategy of rural revitalization and plays an important role in the coordinated and sustainable development of regions. Since China’s reform and opening up, Shaanxi has continued to promote the process of industrialization and urbanization, with increasingly prominent ecological environment problems and increasingly complex rural settlement development [3,4], which are mainly reflected in spatial problems such as disorderly layout and unbalance of form and structure, hindering the realization of rural revitalization [5,6]. Therefore, the study of the rationality of the spatial pattern of rural settlements has attracted the attention of all circles. Weibei Plain is located in the central part of Shaanxi Province. The southern part of Weibei Plain is adjacent to the Weihe River, and the northern part is adjacent to the Loess Plateau. The ecological vulnerability of the two different landforms is more sensitive and far reaching to the regional space. By studying the distribution characteristics and type division of rural settlements in Weibei Plain, more targeted and effective means can be found to alleviate land-use conflicts, improve the rural natural ecological environment [7], and promote sustainable rural development, which is of great significance for optimizing urban and rural settlement patterns and the coordinated and sustainable development of ecological economy [8].
Although countries worldwide have different rural development processes and face different problems, all have continued to explore the rural settlement space. International studies on the spatial characteristics of rural settlements are carried out based on spatial distribution, form, and type. It is found that the settlement space is mainly affected by such factors as topography [9,10], water resources, and traffic accessibility [11], but it also needs to pay attention to the impact of ecological security [12] and living environment guarantee. Landscape safety pattern is an effective way to coordinate rapid urbanization and ecological conservation, it has become a hot spot of attention in recent years, and previous studies have mostly focused on analysis [13,14,15] of ecological safety in geology, hydrology, atmosphere, biodiversity, and farmland. The ecological and environmental issues caused by urbanization, such as urban sprawl, cultural heritage, and recreational space of the safety pattern, are rarely included in the analysis. Therefore, based on previous research, this paper can select security pattern sources that combine natural and human factors, and conduct landscape security pattern analysis to obtain the results of rural settlement zoning. China’s rural areas are vast, with diverse geomorphic types. Some scholars use rural settlement patches and landscape pattern index to study the form, type, spatial distribution characteristics, and influencing factors of typical rural settlements in regions such as mountainous, hilly, and arid oasis areas [16,17]. Research methods on spatial characteristics of relevant rural settlements mainly include spatial interpolation analysis [18], global spatial clustering [19], and continuous spectral transect analysis [20]. Spatial interpolation analysis is not applicable to the Weibei Plain, which does not have the attribute of a circle layer, and global spatial clustering is not suitable to analyze the Weibei Plain with different geomorphic characteristics from a global perspective. In recent years, continuous spectral transect analysis has been gradually adopted by some scholars, which has an obvious classification effect and can centrally display the characteristics of the spatial distribution of research objects and is suitable for research areas distributed with different geomorphic characteristics [21,22,23]. In addition, some scholars used landscape shape index and cluster analysis to discuss regional differentiation characteristics, regional types, and regulation paths of rural settlements from different dimensions of space, scale, and form [24]. It has become a trend to apply rural settlement patches to analyze landscape pattern indexes when analyzing spatial elements. Usually, indicators such as patch density, mean shape index and mean patch fractal dimension are selected to analyze the rural settlement space [25], and this paper can summarize and filter the relevant research indicators in the past and construct the indicator system of two categories of spatial layout and spatial morphology to conduct spatial characteristics analysis. It can be seen from previous studies that the spatial characteristics of rural settlements have significant regional differences [26].
In summary, although studies generally discuss the distribution characteristics and classification types of rural settlements influenced by single factors from different perspectives, they overlook the distribution and classification results of rural settlements under the complex influence of different factors. Meanwhile, currently, research on rural settlements is mostly focused on small- and medium-sized areas such as mountains, hills, and plateaus [27]. The research conclusions are not universal, or the spatial units studied are mostly administrative regions with insufficient precision, which weakens the regional environmental influence of the spatial distribution of rural settlements to a certain extent, and it is difficult to grasp the spatial differentiation scientifically at this level. Therefore, it is urgent to explore the spatial distribution characteristics and types of rural settlements from a large-scale ecological background and combine multiple influencing factors. Therefore, this paper takes rural settlements in Weibei Plain as the research object and innovatively starts from the multidimensional process of ecological zoning-transect analysis-spatial characteristics, adopts landscape security pattern analysis and continuous spectrum transect analysis method, selects transects across Weibei Plain, and uses landscape pattern index to analyze the change rule of distribution and morphological characteristics of rural settlements. In order to comprehensively grasp the characteristics and types of regional rural settlements (Figure 1), the research basis and technical support are provided for an ecological security guarantee and rural settlement control in Weibei Plain.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Survey of Research Area

Weibei Plain is an alluvial plain formed by the fault subsidence zone alluvial by Weihe River and its tributaries Jinghe River and Luohe River. It forms Weihe River Basin with Weihe River valley and Weihe River hills. It is in the central part of Shaanxi Province, in the area north of Weihe River in Guanzhong Plain, from Tongguan in the east to Baoji Gorge in the west. It is an important ecological security barrier and landscape pattern base in the core area of Guanzhong city group and in the north of Xi’an [28]. Weibei Plain is adjacent to Weihe River in the south, mostly impact plain, adjacent to Xi’an and Xianyang metropolitan areas, and adjacent to the Loess Plateau in the north, mostly a ravine area. The topography and geomorphology in the north and south regions are significantly different. Figure 2 shows that the land area is 15,819.24 km2, including 23 districts and counties, of which 10 are districts and counties to the north of Weihe River.

2.2. Data Sources and Processing

The research data sources of this study were a 2018 Landsat TM remote sensing image map, a vector map of administrative divisions in Shaanxi Province, and a 2018 vector map of the spatial distribution of rural residential areas (1:50,000). Using ERDAS IMAG-INE 9.0, the remote sensing images were processed by coordinate transformation, geometric correction, cropping, and merging. With the support of Map GIS 6.7 software, combined with field investigation, a human–computer interactive visual interpretation method and land-use status classification standard were used. The land-use types in the study area were divided into 7 first-class land types—cultivated land, forest land, grass land, water area, construction land, unused land, and traffic land—by using the method of human–computer interactive visual interpretation and the classification standard of land-use status quo. Among them, the construction land includes two secondary land types of urban land and rural residential land, comprehensively verified by high-resolution images and field correction. The average interpretation accuracy was above 85%. The distribution map of rural residential land in Weibei Plain was made, and the number of rural settlement patches in Weibei Plain was 16,051 (Figure 3). The toolbox of ArcGIS was used to convert the vector data of rural residential land into a grid format, and the Fragtats3.4 software program was used to calculate the landscape index.

2.3. Research Methods

Based on the research idea of ecological zoning-transect analysis-spatial characteristics, this study constructed a research framework for the classification of rural settlements in Weibei Plain (Figure 4). Firstly, the landscape security pattern and ecological background were taken as the conditions to analyze and define the characteristics of the basement where the rural settlement patches are located. Secondly, continuous spectral transect analysis was used, which mainly includes two parts. The transects were divided according to the significant difference between the north and south of Weibei Plain, and then the landscape pattern index was used for calculation and analysis. Finally, a multidimensional characteristic matrix of suitability-distribution form was constructed, and a classification method of rural settlements is proposed, that takes ecological background, spatial distribution, and spatial form as elements.

2.3.1. Delineation of Rural Settlement Space Zoning

Table 1 shows that the source of a single security pattern was determined, and the natural and human factors in the region were unified [13,14,15]. According to the characteristics of the current situation of rural settlement patterns in Weibei Plain, the safety source points with large influencing factors was selected. The natural factors included the source of the safety pattern of hydrology and geological disasters. Human factors include urban sprawl, cultural heritage, and recreational space security pattern source.
Starting from the current situation of Weibei Plain and experts’ opinions, four types of resistance factors were selected [29,30]. For this study, we used the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to establish the index system of each resistance factor of recreation space security pattern, geological disaster security pattern, urban sprawl security pattern, and cultural heritage security pattern, then constructed the judgment matrix. Based on the above analysis, the relative importance of each index was obtained; then, the corresponding maximum feature root λ max was obtained [31], and the consistency of the matrix was checked. If the consistency passed, the weight vector ω was obtained after normalization according to the maximum feature vector corresponding to the maximum feature root. Therefore, the weight of each resistance factor index system was determined. The resistance factors were weighted and superposed by the Raster Calculator [32]. The comprehensive resistance score formula is shown in (1).
S = i = 1 n R i k × W i
Here, S is the comprehensive resistance score; R i k is the resistance score of the evaluation unit k corresponding to the resistance factor in item ; W i is the resistance factor weight of item .
Using the Cost–Distance analysis in Arc GIS10.2 spatial analysis, the minimum cumulative resistance surfaces were obtained by introducing hydrology geological disasters, urban sprawl, cultural heritage, and recreation space into a single security pattern source. We reclassified them to obtain suitable zones with a single security pattern and analyzed them by superposition to obtain four types of ecological suitability zones, so that the rural settlement space zoning was obtained.

2.3.2. Select Rural Settlement Characteristic Transect Indicators

Weibei Plain is bounded by Weihe River in the south and Loess Plateau in the north. It is long and narrow in the east and west. The special geographical environment has an important impact on rural settlements. Rural settlement zoning of the Weibei Plain was delineated by ecological background adaptation analysis and by combining two typical geographical features of the southern Weihe River region in the south and the Hanyuan tableland region in the north [33,34]. The Weihe River transect (WH) and Hanyuan Tableland transect (HY) were taken as measurement objects to obtain a specific understanding of the rural settlements in the whole Weibei Plain area. Figure 3 shows that the object of study has a large east–west span. WH and HY transects were selected from 15 km × 15 km transects, numbered from west to east, and each transect was 11 transects.
The spatial characteristics of rural settlements are the basis for the optimal allocation of settlements. Therefore, this study took the optimization of settlement patterns as the guide and the identification of the spatial distribution of rural settlements as the goal. Table 2 illustrates the selection of 2 major categories and 6 minor categories of indexes for quantitative statistics on the spatial distribution and form of rural settlements [35,36,37]. Spatial distribution indexes mainly include scale density, aggregation, and connectivity, while spatial form indexes include shape and fragmentation indexes.

2.3.3. Construction of Multidimensional Feature Matrix

In this study, the rural settlement types were divided by the trinity of ecological background, spatial distribution, and spatial form. Starting from the three dimensions of ecological distribution and form, ecological adaptability analysis of the rural settlements was carried out, and the spatial distribution index and spatial form index of rural settlements were calculated. The landscape security pattern tool was used to constrain the hydrological security pattern, geological disaster security pattern, urban sprawl security pattern, cultural heritage security pattern, and recreational space security pattern of rural settlements in Weibei Plain, and the rural settlement space zoning was obtained by superposition, namely, the S1 lowest security pattern, S2 relatively low-security pattern, S3 medium security pattern, and S4 high-security pattern, to obtain the measurement of the ecological background of rural settlements. Based on the index calculation of spatial distribution, the index values were calculated by the geometric average method after the extreme values of each index were standardized. The changes in scale density index, aggregation index, and connectivity index of rural settlements were analyzed, and then the spatial distribution characteristics of rural settlements were judged, i.e., D1 H-PD, D2 L-PD, D3 agglomeration, D4 dispersion, D5 close, and D6 estrangement. Furthermore, the index of spatial form was calculated, and after the same data processing, the change in the shape index and fragmentation index of rural settlements was analyzed to judge the spatial form characteristics of rural settlements, namely, F1 regular, F2 complex, F3 complete, and F4 fragmentation. According to the two typical regional characteristics of Weihe River and Hanyuan Tableland in Weibei Plain, Weihe River transect (WH) and Hanyuan Tableland transect (HY) were selected as measurement objects. Then, 11 quadrats of the 2 transects were divided by the transect grid tool, and each quadrat was calculated for the indexes of spatial distribution and form. Finally, the results obtained in the three dimensions were integrated and judged for characteristics, the indexes with little difference in the distribution and form of each transect were removed, and the WH transect and HY transect were arranged in a multidimensional feature matrix to ensure the independence of each transect. Finally, a feature matrix model with suitability-distribution form (SDF) as an element was formed to guide the classification of rural settlements (Figure 5).

3. Results

3.1. Analysis of Rural Settlement Space Zoning of Weibei Plain

From the hydrological, geological disasters, urban sprawl, cultural heritage, and landscape security pattern (Figure 6a–e), security differences exist between the north and the south. Especially in terms of urban sprawl and geological disasters, the area near the big cities in the south is better than that near towns in the north. The south area near cities is better than the north area towns. The comprehensive landscape security pattern of Weibei Plain (Figure 6f) shows that the ecological background in the southern area near Weihe River has obvious advantages, especially in the rural settlements around Xianyang and Xi’an, mainly due to its flat terrain without large geological disasters, convenient transportation, and rich tourism resources. The north arid plateau is poorly adapted and is heavily affected by natural factors such as rainfall, land salinization, vegetation cover, and the Loess Plateau. While the southern area is in the alluvial plain, rural settlements are distributed along the Weihe River. The north part belongs to a typical hilly gully area of the Loess Plateau, so rural settlements are more likely to be distributed in the low and slow zone of the channel, which looks like striped distribution. It also shows consistent results of the comprehensive landscape security pattern analysis and the actual settlement distribution. According to the classification of comprehensive security patterns, the rural settlement patches in each district were statistically analyzed (Table 3). Rural settlements in high-security and medium-security patterns accounted for more than 86% of the total patches, indicating good ecological adaptability.

3.2. Analysis of Characteristic Transect of Rural Settlements in Weibei Plain

3.2.1. Spatial Distribution Measurement Analysis

Theoretically, the spatial distribution of rural settlements is generally affected by topography, traffic accessibility, water source conditions, residents’ income, population size, land type, industrial structure and other aspects [25], and relevant indicators such as density size and difference, aggregation degree, and connection are usually selected to analyze the spatial distribution characteristics [19]. In this paper, the above relevant indicators are selected, and the obtained research results show that the spatial distribution of rural settlements in the Weibei Plain is mainly influenced by topography, traffic accessibility, and land type.
Among them, after calculating the landscape pattern index (Table 4), it can be seen from indexes for each patch that the rural settlements in the WH transect are adjacent to the urban suburbs, and the changes from west to east are not obvious (Figure 7a). A total of 80% of the patch areas are small without obvious peaks, and the settlement size has equidistant characteristics. The patch areas in the HY transect gradually decrease from west to east, while 70% of the rural settlement’s fluctuation is small. In quadrat I, there is a peak value within 15 km. The rural settlement area within 135 km of quadrat IX is the smallest and gradually increases. It is mainly restricted by the topographic factors of an arid plateau. From this, the area of rural agglomerative patches is highly affected by urbanization and topography, and the closer to the city and suburbs, the flatter the terrain is, and it is more likely to form large aggregations.
The patch density index of the transect shows that the WH transect has a fluctuating pattern (Figure 7b), while quadrats I and VI are affected by mountains on both sides of the east and west, making settlement density similar and showing a peak value, of which quadrat X has the lowest density within 150 km. The peak quadrat is sandwiched between Xianyang and Xi’an. The city greatly attracts it, with more people staying and a high density of settlements. HY transect presents a single peak type. The settlement density of quadrat I, II, and III are relatively low due to the large area of ecological land. The density of quadrat IV gradually increases after 60 km due to the flat terrain and more constructive lands. The density of quadrat VII and VIII are high. In quadrat IX, it peaks within 135 km, then the value gradually decreases. The density of patches of rural settlements is not only affected by the landscape’s natural topography but also closely related to land type.
The aggregation index of transect patches shows that the distance between the rural settlements in the WH transect changes from near to far, and the distribution changes from intensive to discrete in Figure 7c. Moreover, the rural settlements in quadrat X have higher dispersion and present a peak value, which is consistent with the desertification characteristics of large areas of Dali County. The distance between the settlements in the HY transect changes from far to near, and the distribution changes from discrete to intensive, which is mainly because the rural settlement patches in remote channels are mostly distributed in scattered spaces with small clusters of single households. There is a peak in quadrat I, and settlements are the most scattered. It shows that the area is close to the lowest security zone and is seriously affected, with scattered settlements.
From the change in the connectivity index in Figure 7d, the rural settlements in the WH transect show fluctuation, with a large change mainly caused by the runoff of the Weihe River, Jinghe River, Qianhe River, and other rivers in the transect zone. The density connectivities of settlements in quadrats I and IX show a peak value and are closely linked. Affected by the comprehensive security pattern, quadrat XI has the lowest security pattern with poor road connectivity and the lowest connectivity. HY transect presents a double peak distribution with peaks on quadrat II and VI, which is consistent with the actual situation of flat terrain and convenient road traffic in Fengxiang County and Liquan County in this region. The rural settlements in this region have the highest connectivity. The settlements in quadrat XI have the lowest connectivity, mainly because Dali County has the lowest security situation, land desertification is serious, and transportation is difficult to reach. It can be seen from this that the connection degree of rural settlements is strongly influenced by traffic. The rural settlements near the national and provincial roads are closely connected, but due to the restriction of channel topography, traffic is difficult to maintain, and the rural settlements are gradually estranged.

3.2.2. Spatial Form Measurement Analysis

Generally speaking, the spatial morphology of rural settlements is mainly influenced by the geographical environment and agricultural production methods [23]. From the results of this paper, which do not differ much from previous scholars’ studies, the factors influencing the spatial morphology of rural settlements in the Weibei Plain are mainly influenced by two aspects, namely rivers and topography.
Among them, the shape index in Figure 7e shows that the WH transect presents wave type, which is affected by the hydrological distribution of the Weihe River. The shape of rural settlements is complex. More than 70% of patches are irregular and vary greatly, with peaks appearing in samples III and VIII. The quadrat V is affected by the flat terrain, which has the lowest value. The settlement status is regular. HY transect presents a single peak type distribution and a peak value in quadrat IV. Yongshou County in this area is mostly a valley and hilly area, and settlement boundaries are distributed along the valley floor with complex shapes. After quadrat VI, the change of settlement shape is little, and the rural settlement shape tends to be similar. It can be seen that the patch shape is greatly affected by natural factors such as rivers and topography, and the boundary shape changes with the surrounding landform.
The fragmentation index in Figure 7f shows that the WH transect fluctuates greatly, and the degree of fragmentation of settlements in different quadrats changes. Quadrats I and IX show peaks due to the influence of urban sprawl. Rural settlements in this region are highly fragmented. Quadrat X is in a region with the lowest degree of fragmentation due to its high degree of urbanization. HY transect has a less fluctuation range than the WH transect, but it has a higher degree of fragmentation than the WH transect rural settlements. It is mainly distributed in gullies and valleys of the Loess Plateau with severe terrain fragmentation. This indicates that the fragmentation degree of rural settlements in the HY transect is highly affected by topography.

3.3. Classification of Rural Settlement Pattern in Weibei Plain

3.3.1. WH Transect Rural Settlement Pattern Classification

According to the arrangement of the characteristic transects, the indexes with little difference in patch size and density were removed. The WH transect selected the index of the spatial distribution’s degree of connection and the index of the spatial form’s degree of fragmentation. The two indexes have a strong positive correlation with a linear correlation coefficient of 0.769, which is significant at the level of 0.01 (two-sided test). According to the multidimensional characteristic matrix (Figure 5), the connection index can be divided into two levels of tightness and estrangement, and the fragmentation index can be divided into two levels, completeness and fragmentation. The four sub-regions with ecological background adaptability are substituted into the matrix for a matrix arrangement of 4 × 2 × 2. Theoretically, 16 kinds of rural settlement divisions in the WH transect were obtained, and irrational divisions were deleted, totaling 6 kinds (Figure 8).
The high security-close-complete type (HSCC) includes 1301 rural settlements in Table 5. The average patch area of rural settlements is relatively large, mainly distributed in Qindu District, Weicheng District, Gaoling District, and Lintong District, which are adjacent to the city center. This type of settlement has a superior ecological background, large location advantages, and obvious development momentum and is the ideal distribution mode of rural settlements in the WH transect.
The middle security-close-complete type (MSCC) is mainly distributed in the village areas where villages and towns are located, involving 4890 settlements. This type has good ecological advantages, relatively flat terrain, few geological disasters, superior natural environment, convenient transportation, convenient travel for rural residents, large population and land-use scale, perfect infrastructure, good economic foundation, and certain development potential. The middle security-estrange-fragmentation type (MSEF) comprises 2445 rural settlements. Although it has a good ecological background, it is inconvenient for transportation, the connection between settlements is estranged, and the degree of internal fragmentation is high. Therefore, the main optimization approach is to strengthen the overall connection of rural settlements, promote the circulation of elements between villages and towns, and form a scale effect.
The relatively low security-close-complete type (RLSCC) includes 411 rural settlements. This type is mainly distributed in the surrounding villages where the township government is located and is close to the main traffic arteries. It has good traffic conditions and can be developed in groups.
The relatively low security-estranged-fragmentation (RLSEF) and the lowest security-estrange-fragmentation (LSEF) are the two most undesirable types of WH transect rural settlement patterns, involving 295 settlements. The main problems of the two types lie in the poor ecological background, mostly distributed in the fragmentation zone far away from villages and towns, the poor traffic location conditions, and the poor connection between settlements. The best way to optimize this type of settlement is to relocate the settlements while providing good transportation and infrastructure conditions for the new settlements.

3.3.2. HY Transect Rural Settlement Pattern Classification

The HY transect selected the aggregation index of spatial distribution and the shape index of spatial form, and its linear correlation coefficient is 0.816, which is significant at the level of 0.01 (two-sided test), showing a positive correlation. Using a multidimensional characteristic matrix, the aggregation index can be divided into two levels: aggregation and dispersion, and the shape index into two levels: regular and complex. It is also arranged in a matrix with four kinds of security pattern zoning; finally, seven zones were obtained (Figure 9).
The high security-agglomeration-regular type (HSAR) and high security-agglomeration-complex type (HSAC) are mainly distributed in Qishan County, Fufeng County, and Qian County in Figure 8, with a total of 1470 rural settlements in Table 6. All villages of this type are in the hinterland of the Weibei plain, with few geological disasters and sufficient ecological advantages, and the ecological background advantage is high and densely distributed, which is a better distribution mode of rural settlements in the Hanyuan Tableland transect.
The middle security-agglomeration-regular type (MSAR) and the middle security-dispersion-complex type (MSDC) are distributed in Fuping County and Pucheng County. There are 1386 rural settlement patches. The average patch area of this type of settlement is 15,000–25,000 m2, which has certain natural or human value. Its characteristics are mainly a large population, large land-use scale, perfect infrastructure, and good economic foundation. This type of village should meet the demand for construction land by tapping the potential inside. The production and living conditions in the region have been improved by obtaining a certain amount of arable land resources through layout optimization.
There are 3202 rural settlement patches in the relatively low security-agglomeration-complex type (RLSAC) and the relatively low security-dispersion-complex type (RLSDC). The rural settlements are mainly adjacent to the northern Loess Plateau and the western mountain terrain, which leads to an insufficient ecological background. The main problem is that the settlement patches are small and numerous. There are 535 settlements that are relatively concentrated. This type can be taken as the preferred object of the central village. The optimization focus is on integrating residential areas and the supporting services of corresponding public facilities. A total of 2667 settlement patches are scattered, and the focus of type change optimization is the spatial integration of settlements within or among multiple settlements.
The lowest security-agglomeration-complex type (LSAC) includes 651 rural settlements. This type of village is seriously affected by the northern Loess Plateau, with obviously insufficient ecological background and complex settlement shapes. Therefore, the focus of optimization should be to strengthen rural ecological restoration, increase financial support, improve transportation and infrastructure conditions, integrate residential areas, organize group development, and provide convenient conditions for residential lives.

4. Discussion

The development of rural settlement space carries the dual functions of promoting rural revitalization and alleviating urban congestion. A comprehensive grasp of the characteristic composition and differentiation pattern of rural settlement space can provide a scientific theoretical and practical basis for studying rural development issues and territorial spatial planning. Different from previous studies that only selected unilateral factors [38] to analyze the characteristics of the spatial distribution of rural settlements, this paper breaks out of the limitation of combination analysis of a single factor [39] and reveals the spatial pattern characteristics of rural settlements in Weibei Plain from a large-scale and multidimensional perspective.
Through the previous research, in the analysis of settlement spatial zoning based on ecological background, it can be concluded that due to the influence of terrain, climate, and transportation facilities, the overall ecological adaptability of the Weibei Plain is good, and the southern part is significantly better than the northern part. Similar to previous studies, multiple factors were used for overlay analysis to obtain ecological security results. However, this study starts from the large-scale ecological background and divides the spatial characteristics of rural settlements into spatial zones, which is different from other small-scale studies [40]. In the analysis of spatial distribution measurement, it can be concluded that the distribution of rural settlements is mainly affected by the topography and the traffic accessibility, which is consistent with the research results of scholars such as Rongtian Zhang [41], but different from their results that rural settlements are less distributed in areas close to built-up areas, the research results of this paper show that rural settlements are more concentrated in areas close to the suburban areas of cities with flat terrain and convenient traffic. In the analysis of spatial morphology measurement, it can be concluded that due to natural factors such as rivers, terrain, and landforms, the rural settlement morphology in the southern WH transect is relatively regular, while the rural settlement morphology in the northern HY transect is relatively fragmented. The research results are similar to those of scholars such as Lin Wang [42]. However, different from their research results that the physical geography environment is only a secondary influencing factor, the physical geography environment of the Weibei Plain has a decisive impact on the spatial form of rural settlements. In terms of rural settlement feature classification, this study uses the SDF feature matrix model to classify rural settlement types based on the three-dimensional features of background, distribution, and morphology mentioned above. The classification results are similar to those of scholars such as Zongfeng Chen [19], who obtained multiple rural settlement types with different characteristics and proposed improvement strategies based on different types. However, this study takes into account the different spatial characteristics of the Weihe River and the Hanyuan tableland in the Weibei Plain region, as well as the independence of the spatial indicator characteristics of each transect. Therefore, a total of 13 types of rural settlements in different zones were designated to ensure that the results were more targeted, which has important theoretical and practical significance for sustainable rural development.
In terms of theoretical significance, this study enriches the research content of ecologically sustainable development theory in Weibei Plain and also provides new ideas for the study of spatial characteristics and classification of rural settlements in Weibei Plain and even in various regions of China. According to the spatial zoning of rural settlements delimited by this study, local governments can formulate more suitable development policies for rural settlements according to different regional characteristics. In high-security areas with flat terrain, settlement production efficiency, and local economic development are the primary considerations. Policymaking should emphasize the balance between ecological and historical sites and people’s production and life in medium- and relatively low-security areas. Due to the fragile natural ecosystem of the lowest security areas, relevant laws, and regulations should be passed to restrict the development of rural settlements and encourage residents to settle in a centralized way to maintain the ecosystem. HSCC and HSAR are the better distribution modes of rural settlements, and the two types of zoning should be centralized allocation of resources and strengthen the allocation of infrastructure. The optimization of RLSCC and RLSAC focuses on the spatial integration of multiple settlements and the large-scale development of clusters. LSEF should carry out the relocation of residential areas. It has guidance and reference significance for solving the spatial decay of rural settlements in Weibei Plain, improving the rural living environment, and realizing rural revitalization and new urbanization.
Based on theories related to sustainable development, this paper studies the spatial distribution, morphological attributes, and the matrix in which the rural settlements are located and combines the two into different types according to their different characteristics. However, some shortcomings still need to be further developed in this paper: (1) This paper takes the settlement space as a whole for analysis and fails to analyze and discuss the mechanism of the detailed space of individual patches inside rural settlements. Therefore, it is necessary to explore further the influence mechanism of micro-spatial structure factors on settlement patterns. (2) This study only analyzes the spatial characteristics and types of rural settlements and lacks the analysis of the links between rural settlement patches and other social and economic attributes other than natural attributes [43]. Therefore, the research on rural settlements’ economic types and structural efficiency need to be improved. (3) The spatial characteristics of rural settlements are the spatial forms that evolved in the process of long-term historical development. It is necessary to further explore the dynamic evolution law and influence mechanism of rural settlements space in the time dimension. In the future, on the basis of this study, the comprehensive effects of social and economic factors can be incorporated into the evaluation system, and the spatial pattern of rural settlements can be evaluated more comprehensively and accurately combined with the changes in time and space, which can also provide support for the spatial planning of national territory, the construction of new countryside and the optimization decision of spatial pattern of villages and towns.

5. Conclusions

In this study, a multidimensional feature matrix model was established from three dimensions: background, distribution, and morphology. The spatial differentiation characteristics of rural settlements in the Weibei Plain on two characteristic zones of the Weibei Plain were analyzed using landscape safety pattern theory, spatial data, and sample grid methods, and rural settlement types were classified:
(1)
The spatial partitioning of rural settlements in the Weibei Plain was finally classified into four categories using landscape security pattern theory calculation and analysis. The number of rural settlements in high- and medium-security patterns accounted for 86.79%, and the overall ecological adaptability was good. Moreover, the ecological background of rural settlements in the southern region was better than that in the northern region, consistent with the current investigation of Weibei Plain.
(2)
In the rural settlement space of Weibei Plain, the WH and HY transects were selected according to the results of ecological adaptability zoning; the spatial distribution measure analysis showed that 80% of the rural settlements in the WH transect from west to east had small patch area and small change range, patch density fluctuated, and patch aggregation changed from intensive to discrete. Due to the influence of river runoff, patch connectivity fluctuates greatly. In the HY transect, 70% patch area fluctuated a little and decreased from west to east. Patch density was unimodal; patch aggregation changed from discrete to intensive; patch connectivity was strongly influenced by traffic and was closely connected near roads. According to the analysis of spatial morphology measure, 70% of the patches in the average shape index of the WH transect were irregular and varied greatly, while the rural settlement morphology in the HY transect tended to be similar. The rural settlements in the HY transect are mainly distributed in the gully area of the Loess Plateau, and the topography is severely fragmented, which is higher than that in the WH transect.
(3)
According to the characteristic transect analysis results, the WH transect in Weibei Plain was divided into six types and the HY transect was divided into seven types by a multidimensional characteristic matrix. Among them, LSEF and LSAC are the key areas of rural settlement optimization. The local government should adjust to local conditions and orderly carry out village renovation and construction planning according to different types.
Compared with the existing studies, this paper extends the current research methods for classifying the spatial characteristics of rural settlements. The constructed multidimensional characteristic matrix makes up for the deficiencies in the classification criteria based on single analysis tools and single dimensions. It is also an extension and supplement to the objects constructed by the analysis of transect and quadrat. It is gradually applied to studying the urbanization system and the spatial characteristics of settlements in urban and rural planning and can form a complete range, scale, and morphological characteristics of settlements and a multidimensional classification system. In summary, this study scientifically classified rural settlement areas for sustainable development and proposed key areas for rural settlement optimization. The research results can provide a reference and basis for studies on spatial structure optimization, allocation of public service facilities, integrated urban-rural development, and rural policy formulation in the Weibei Plain or similar areas.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.D., Q.H. and L.Z.; Data curation, S.C. and D.L.; Formal analysis, S.C. and D.W.; Funding acquisition, Q.H. and Y.D.; Investigation, D.W.; Methodology, L.Z. and D.L.; Project administration, Y.D.; Resources, Q.H. and D.W.; Software, L.Z.; Supervision, Y.D. and Q.H.; Validation, Y.D. and Q.H.; Visualization, S.C. and L.Z.; Writing—original draft, Y.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 52178030, and the Philosophy and Social Science Research Project in Shaanxi, grant number 2023ZD0622 and 2022HZ1870.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We are thankful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vaz, T. Traditional Food Production and Rural Sustainable Development. Tijdschr. Voor Econ. Soc. Geogr. 2011, 102, 380–383. [Google Scholar]
  2. Yi, S.M.; Liao, L.P.; Li, K. The Symbiosis Strategy In Rural Revitalization And Guangxi Practice. Planners 2018, 34, 68–73. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zeng, X.; Zhao, Y. The Characteristics of Rural Settlement Landscape in Hilly Area from the Perspective of Ecological Environment. J. Coast. Res. 2020, 103, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ji, H.; Li, X.; Wei, X.; Liu, W.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L. Mapping 10-m Resolution Rural Settlements Using Multi-Source Remote Sensing Datasets with the Google Earth Engine Platform. Remote Sens. 2020, 12, 2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fang, F.; Ma, L.; Fan, H.; Che, X.; Chen, M. The spatial differentiation of quality of rural life based on natural controlling factors: A case study of Gansu Province, China. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 264, 110439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cai, J.; Li, X.; Liu, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X.; Lu, S. Coupling and coordinated development of new urbanization and agro-ecological environment in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 776, 145837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tu, S.S.; Zhou, X.Y.; Long, H.L.; Liang, X.L. Research Progress and Prospect of Spatial Evolution and Optimization of Rural Settlements. Econ. Geogr. 2019, 39, 142–149. [Google Scholar]
  8. Qu, Y.; Jiang, G.; Ma, W.; Li, Z. How does the rural settlement transition contribute to shaping sustainable rural development? Evidence from Shandong, China. J. Rural Stud. 2021, 82, 279–293. [Google Scholar]
  9. Du, Y.; Hu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Peng, J. Building ecological security patterns in southwestern mountainous areas based on ecological importance and ecological sensitivity: A case study of Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan Province. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2017, 37, 8241–8253. [Google Scholar]
  10. Li, J.; Cai, Z.; Duan, L. Spatial Distribution Characteristics and Optimum Layout of Urban and Rural Areas in Different Geomorphological Types. Earth Sci. Res. J. 2020, 24, 267–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ajaero, C.K.; Onokala, P.C. The Effects of Rural-Urban Migration on Rural Communities of Southeastern Nigeria. Int. J. Popul. Res. 2013, 2013, 610193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Otiman, P.I. Romania’S Agri-Food And Rural Development Strategy. Agric. Econ. Rural Dev. 2013, 10, 133–153. [Google Scholar]
  13. Peng, J.; Pan, Y.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, H.; Wang, Y. Linking ecological degradation risk to identify ecological security patterns in a rapidly urbanizing landscape. Habitat Int. 2018, 71, 110–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Su, Y.; Chen, X.; Liao, J.; Zhang, H.; Wang, C.; Ye, Y.; Wang, Y. Modeling the optimal ecological security pattern for guiding the urban constructed land expansions. Urban For. Urban Green. 2016, 19, 35–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Du, P.; Xia, J.; Du, Q.; Luo, Y.; Tan, K. Evaluation of the spatio-temporal pattern of urban ecological security using remote sensing and GIS. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2013, 34, 848–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tan, X.L.; Zhou, G.H.; Zhu, S.H.; Ou, C. Landscape Pattern Changes and the Characteristic of Spatio-temporal Differentiation of Rural Residential Area in Changsha in Recent 20 Years. Sci. Geogr. Sin. 2015, 35, 204–210. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhang, B.L.; Zhang, F.R.; Gao, Y.; Li, C.; Zhu, F.K. Identification and spatial differentiation of rural settlements’multifunction. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2014, 30, 216–224. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cheng, X.L.; Zeng, Y.N.; Liu, W.J. A Comparative Study of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Meteorological Elements in Subtropical Mountainous and Hilly regions of China. Geo Spat. Inf. Technol. 2017, 40, 51–56. [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen, Z.F.; Li, Y.R.; Liu, Y.S. Distribution pattern characteristic and type classification of rural settlements in loess hilly-gully region. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2017, 33, 266–274. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, Y.; Fu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, H.; Xu, X. The spatiotemporal differentiation characteristics and response mechanism of landscape pattern gradient in Haikou City. J. Northwest For. Univ. 2020, 35, 258–268. [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang, Y.Y.; Wang, H.W.; Yang, S.T.; Liu, J.J.; Liu, X.Y. Distribution characteristics and influencing factors of rural settlements in Ebinur Lake Basin—Taking Jinghe County of Xinjiang as an example. Jiangsu Agric. Sci. 2019, 47, 254–259. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yao, F.; Chen, L.; Wang, B.Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, T.J.; Zhang, Y. Analysis on Gradient Characteristic of Landscape Pattern of Land Use in Chaohu Lake-Land Ecotone. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2016, 23, 214–219. [Google Scholar]
  23. Xu, Y.; Zhong, Y.X.; Xu, L.T.; Wu, W. Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Driving Forces of Rural Settlements in Background of Rural Revitalization Strategy: A Case Study of Jiangxi Province. J. Agro For. Econ. Manag. 2018, 17, 100–108. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ma, X.D.; Li, Q.L.; Shen, Y. Morphological Difference and Regional Types of Rural Settlements in Jiangsu Province. Acta Geogr. Sin. 2012, 67, 516–525. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang, J.; Zhang, Y. Analysis on the Evolution of Rural Settlement Pattern and Its Influencing Factors in China from 1995 to 2015. Land 2021, 10, 1137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Shi, M.; Xie, Y.; Cao, Q. Spatiotemporal Changes in Rural Settlement Land and Rural Population in the Middle Basin of the Heihe River, China. Sustainability 2016, 8, 614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cao, Y.; Bai, Z.; Sun, Q.; Zhou, W. Rural settlement changes in compound land use areas: Characteristics and reasons of changes in a mixed mining-rural-settlement area in Shanxi Province, China. Habitat Int. 2017, 61, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tao, H.; Ding, J.; Zheng, M.M.; Li, W.L.; He, X.B. Evaluation and evolution law of groundwater quality in Weihe River Plain. J. Water Resour. Water Eng. 2018, 29, 50–56. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang, Z.; Hu, B.; Qiu, H. Comprehensive assessment of ecological risk in southwest Guangxi-Beibu bay based on DPSIR model and OWA-GIS. Ecol. Indic. 2021, 132, 108334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ersayin, K.; Tagil, S. Ecological sensitivity and risk assessment in the Kizilirmak Delta. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2018, 26, 6508–6516. [Google Scholar]
  31. Guo, P.; Zhang, F.; Wang, H.; Qin, F. Suitability Evaluation and Layout Optimization of the Spatial Distribution of Rural Residential Areas. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jin, Y.; Che, Y.; Yang, K. Zoning of River Network Protection Based on Minimum Cumulative Resistance Model. Resour. Environ. Yangtze Basin 2013, 22, 8–14. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhou, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xie, B.P.; Pei, T.T.; Yi, X.C. Connection and Influence Scope of Guanzhong Plain Urban Group. Areal Res. Dev. 2019, 38, 54–59. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wei, X.H.; Bai, Y.P.; Che, L.; Wang, D.; Xiao, R.; Zhang, W.X. Evaluation of human settlement environment quality of urban agglomeration in Guanzhong Plain based on grid data. Arid Land Geogr. 2019, 42, 1176–1184. [Google Scholar]
  35. Xie, L.; Li, X.K.; Yu, T. Spatial Distribution of Rural Settlement in the Hilly Three Gorges Reservoir Area Based on GIS: A Cases Study of Tujing and Shibao Towns, Zhongxian. Res. Soil Water Conserv. 2014, 21, 217–222. [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhou, T.; Jiang, G.; Ma, W.; Li, G.; Qu, Y.; Tian, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Tian, Y. Dying villages to prosperous villages: A perspective from revitalization of idle rural residential land (IRRL). J. Rural Stud. 2021, 84, 45–54. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bao, R.; Bo, Y.U. Spatial Reconstruction of Rural Settlements in Central China. J. Landsc. Res. 2018, 10, 12–14+24. a. [Google Scholar]
  38. Li, G.; Jiang, C.; Du, J.; Jia, Y.; Bai, J. Spatial differentiation characteristics of internal ecological land structure in rural settlements and its response to natural and socio-economic conditions in the Central Plains, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 709, 135932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Dou, H.; Ma, L.; Li, H.; Bo, J.; Fang, F. Impact evaluation and driving type identification of human factors on rural human settlement environment: Taking Gansu Province, China as an example. Open Geosci. 2020, 12, 1324–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. He, J.H.; Jia, N.; Li, Y.J.; Tan, R.N.; Yan, C. Layout optimization of rural residential areas in Hehuang Valley of northeast Qinghai Tibet-Plateau. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2021, 37, 258–265. [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang, R.; Zhang, X. Distribution Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Rural Settlements in Metropolitan Fringe Area: A Case Study of Nanjing, China. Land 2022, 11, 1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, L.; Zeng, J. Spatial differentiation characteristics and types classification of rural settlements in southwest Shandong: A case study of Heze city. Geogr. Res. 2021, 40, 17. [Google Scholar]
  43. Liu, S.; Ma, L.; Yao, Y.; Cui, X. Man-land relationship based on the spatial coupling of population and residential land—A case study of Yuzhong County in Longzhong Loess Hilly Region, China. Land Use Policy 2022, 116, 106059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overall flowchart of the research.
Figure 1. Overall flowchart of the research.
Sustainability 15 08736 g001
Figure 2. Regional Scope of Weibei Plain.
Figure 2. Regional Scope of Weibei Plain.
Sustainability 15 08736 g002
Figure 3. Settlement Distribution and Transect Setting.
Figure 3. Settlement Distribution and Transect Setting.
Sustainability 15 08736 g003
Figure 4. Construction of Suitability-Distribution Form Classification System.
Figure 4. Construction of Suitability-Distribution Form Classification System.
Sustainability 15 08736 g004
Figure 5. SDF Characteristic Matrix Model.
Figure 5. SDF Characteristic Matrix Model.
Sustainability 15 08736 g005
Figure 6. Security Pattern in Weibei Plain. (a) Security Pattern of Hydrology; (b) Security Pattern of Geological Disasters; (c) Security Pattern of Urban Sprawl; (d) Security Pattern of Cultural Heritage; (e) Security Pattern of Recreational Space; (f) Comprehensive Landscape Security Pattern.
Figure 6. Security Pattern in Weibei Plain. (a) Security Pattern of Hydrology; (b) Security Pattern of Geological Disasters; (c) Security Pattern of Urban Sprawl; (d) Security Pattern of Cultural Heritage; (e) Security Pattern of Recreational Space; (f) Comprehensive Landscape Security Pattern.
Sustainability 15 08736 g006aSustainability 15 08736 g006b
Figure 7. Statistics of WH Transect and HY Transect Index. (a) MPS; (b) PD; (c) MNN; (d) CONNECT; (e) SHAPE-MN; (f) SHDI.
Figure 7. Statistics of WH Transect and HY Transect Index. (a) MPS; (b) PD; (c) MNN; (d) CONNECT; (e) SHAPE-MN; (f) SHDI.
Sustainability 15 08736 g007
Figure 8. Zoning of WH Transect.
Figure 8. Zoning of WH Transect.
Sustainability 15 08736 g008
Figure 9. Zoning of HY Transect.
Figure 9. Zoning of HY Transect.
Sustainability 15 08736 g009
Table 1. Determination of Single Security Pattern Source.
Table 1. Determination of Single Security Pattern Source.
Security Source PointSource Point Identification
Source of Hydrological Security Pattern6 Rivers: Weihe River, Jinghe River, Qianhe River, Qishui River, Zero River, and Shichuan River
10 Reservoirs: Feng Jiashan Reservoir, Wang Jiaya Reservoir, Dongfeng- Reservoir, Bai Digou Reservoir, Disi Reservoir, Guanwu Reservoir, Yang- Maowan Reservoir, Da Beigou Reservoir, Ganhe Reservoir, and Xijiao Reservoir
Source of Geological Disaster Security Pattern6 Landslides, Collapses and Mudslides: Weibin District, Jintai District and Chencang District in the central part of Baoji City, the southern bank of Jinghe River in Xianyang City, and the loess tableland area of Pucheng County in the northern part of Weinan City.
Source of Urban Sprawl Security Pattern23 Counties and Towns: Sanyuan County, Liquan County, Jingyang County, Qian County, Weicheng District, Mei County, Qindu District, Fuping County, Xingping City, Yanliang district, Yangling District, Fufeng County, Lintong District, Gaoling District, Wugong County, Dali County, Pucheng county, Linwei District, Qishan County, Weibin District, Jintai District, Fengxiang County and Chencang district
Source of Cultural Heritage Security Pattern3 Imperial Mausoleums: Maoling in Xingping City, Zhaoling in Liquan County, and Xianling in Sanyuan County
2 Temples: Zhougong Temple in Qishan County and Famen Temple in Fufeng County
2 ancient ruins: Qin Yongcheng ruins and Zhouyuan ruins.
Source of Recreational Space Security Pattern4 park scenic spots: Wu Shan Forest Park in Chencang district, Daijiawan Ecological Park in Jintai District, Weihe Wetland Ecological Park in Yangling District, and Yunvtan Scenic Spot in Qishan County
Table 2. Summary of Indexes and Calculation Methods.
Table 2. Summary of Indexes and Calculation Methods.
Indicator NameCalculation Method
Spatial Distribution IndexScale
Density
Mean Patch Size (MPS) Total   Area   of   Patch   Types   in   Rural   Settlements Number   of   plaques   of   this   type
Patch Density
(PD)
Total   number   of   rural   settlement   patches Total   patch   area
AggregationMean Nearest-Neighborhood Distance (MNN) S u m   o f   t h e   c l o s e s t   d i s t a n c e s   f r o m   t h e r u r a l   s e t t l e m e n t   p a t c h e s Total   number   of   patches   with   the   closest   distance
ConnectivityConnectivity
(CONNECT)
C = i = 1 n n i / F
ni is the number of type i land patches in the area.
F is the total land area.
Spatial Form IndexShapeMean Shape
(SHAPE-MN)
S H A P E = E / m i n ( E i )
Ei is the ratio occupied by landscape patch shape i.
FragmentationShannon’s Diversity Index
(SHDI)
S H D I = i = 1 m p i / l n p i
pi is the ratio occupied by landscape patch type i.
Table 3. Statistics on Spatial Zoning of Rural Settlements in Weibei Plain.
Table 3. Statistics on Spatial Zoning of Rural Settlements in Weibei Plain.
Ecological Suitability ZoningArea
(ha)
Patches Quantity in Rural SettlementsPatches Area of Rural Settlements (ha)Proportion of Total Patches
(%)
The High Security Pattern127,164292922,689.1618.25
The Middle security Pattern882,41211,00289,712.4768.54
The Relatively Low Security Pattern202,524184914,186.3611.52
The Lowest security Pattern286,3022711957.271.69
Table 4. Summary of Index Calculation by Region.
Table 4. Summary of Index Calculation by Region.
TransectIndex AreaSpatial Distribution IndexSpatial Form Index
Scale DensityAggregationConnectivityShapeFragmentation
(MPS)(PD)(MNN)(CONNECT)(SHAPE-MN)(SHDI)
WH TransectI (0,15)7.005821.402651.06410.9521.29020.9371
II [15,30)8.036016.134150.25120.94761.25950.9036
III [30,45)9.142612.693856.14190.35451.32140.5489
IV [45,60)8.174616.62953.06750.2671.26630.6419
V [60,75)7.968820.235550.49270.68981.20270.7885
VI [75,90)7.865321.518945.68460.47821.22610.7813
VII [90,105)8.485813.741342.60650.5291.310.7555
VIII [105,130)8.691414.078352.55860.3731.34340.6772
IX [130,145)8.201916.549452.17840.57771.28290.5892
X [145,160)8.62007.561673.76960.20891.32290.3829
XI [160,175]8.953711.675369.11150.09831.27580.6134
HY TransectI [0,15)14.68371.2096111.27030.31331.20020.7394
II [15,30)9.26824.0349100.7810.98241.18510.737
III [30,45)10.91212.580994.7460.2581.25250.8729
IV [45,60)9.06247.50664.17480.52811.38710.8592
V [60,75)8.256115.101757.25230.20251.25650.8856
VI [75,90)7.168425.632855.91470.98231.20460.7187
VII [90,105)7.079925.807355.91530.14741.2010.859
VIII [105,130)7.326825.764646.57220.18381.24680.8922
IX [130,145)4.531131.487847.70.25781.22910.7942
X [145,160)7.455819.427654.98180.11621.24950.8477
XI [160,175]8.53349.32670.84490.10581.29050.4834
Table 5. Summary of WH Transect Zoning.
Table 5. Summary of WH Transect Zoning.
Zoning TypePatches QuantityProportion of Patches QuantityAverage Patch Area (m2) Average Patch Area RatioCONNECTSHDI
HSCC130113.93%42,376.9643.16%0.920.92
MSCC489052.34%25,760.7826.23%0.780.78
MSEF244526.17%11,349.2811.56%0.610.65
RLSCC4114.40%9860.3710.04%0.490.72
RLSEF2052.19%5260.825.36%0.310.58
LSEF900.96%3587.763.65%0.190.39
Table 6. Summary of HY Transect Zoning.
Table 6. Summary of HY Transect Zoning.
Zoning TypePatches QuantityProportion of Patches QuantityAverage Patch Area (m2) Average Patch Area RatioMNNSHAPE-MN
HSAR97714.56%33,410.0427.27%112.381.15
HSAC4937.35%28,454.6923.23%94.741.24
MSAR6469.63%25,246.3220.61%80.691.17
MSDC74011.03%15,674.1412.79%57.251.25
RLSAC5357.97%6798.455.55%70.491.18
RLSDC266739.75%8887.177.25%50.431.29
LSAC6519.70%4046.053.30%46.571.38
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duan, Y.; Chen, S.; Zhang, L.; Wang, D.; Liu, D.; Hou, Q. Spatial Distribution Characteristic and Type Classification of Rural Settlements: A Case Study of Weibei Plain, China. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118736

AMA Style

Duan Y, Chen S, Zhang L, Wang D, Liu D, Hou Q. Spatial Distribution Characteristic and Type Classification of Rural Settlements: A Case Study of Weibei Plain, China. Sustainability. 2023; 15(11):8736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118736

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duan, Yaqiong, Su Chen, Lingda Zhang, Dan Wang, Dongyang Liu, and Quanhua Hou. 2023. "Spatial Distribution Characteristic and Type Classification of Rural Settlements: A Case Study of Weibei Plain, China" Sustainability 15, no. 11: 8736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118736

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop