Next Article in Journal
Accepted Guidelines on the Potential of Water Budgets for Solving Droughts: A Case Study of Chum Saeng Sub-District, Satuek District, Buri Ram Province, Thailand
Previous Article in Journal
Abiotic and Biotic Effects on Microbial Diversity of Small Water Bodies in and around Towns
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Impact of Compression Casting Technique on the Mechanical Properties of 100% Recycled Aggregate Concrete

1
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology Lahore, Lahore 54890, Pakistan
2
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering & Technology Lahore, Narowal Campus, Narowal 51601, Pakistan
3
Laboratoire Matériaux et Durabilité des Constructions (LMDC), Université de Toulouse, INSA, UPS Génie Civil, 135 Ave. de Rangueil, CEDEX 04, 31077 Toulouse, France
4
School of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3001, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2023, 15(10), 8153; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108153
Submission received: 22 April 2023 / Revised: 8 May 2023 / Accepted: 15 May 2023 / Published: 17 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Materials)

Abstract

:
The research work presented in this manuscript focused on the comparative examination of the influence of the Compression Casting Technique (CCT) and the conventional casting method (i.e., compaction through vibration) on the performance of 100% Recycled Aggregate Concrete (RAC). The minimum target compressive strength of 100% RAC was 15 MPa keeping in view its application in the manufacturing of load-bearing concrete masonry units. A total of 28 concrete compositions were prepared by varying the coarse to fine aggregates ratio (i.e., 70:30 and 60:40), cement content (10% and 15%) by weight of total aggregates, casting technique, and applied pressure for compression casting (i.e., 25, 35, and 45 MPa). The concrete compositions were tested to determine their density, compressive strength, Elastic Modulus (EM), and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV). For comparison, samples of Natural Aggregate Concrete (NAC) were also tested for the same properties. The results highlighted the positive impact of CCT on the properties of 100% RAC. The compressive strength and EM of fully RAC was increased by 20–80% and 15–50%, respectively, by changing casting method from vibration to CCT. At casting pressure of 35 MPa and 15% cement, compressed 100% RAC exhibited compressive strength higher than vibrated NAC. The UPV value exhibited by 100% RAC was increased by changing the casting technique. The analytical models were proposed using regression analysis of experimental results to predict compressive strength and EM of compressed 100% RAC and NAC. These proposed models were evaluated using statistical parameters, i.e., average absolute error (AAE) and mean (M) and found to be able to predict the compressive strength and EM of RAC with reasonable accuracy as compared to the analytical models already existing in the literature. This study finally concluded that through CCT, 100% RAC with low cement content could achieve minimum target compressive strength of 15 MPa. The development and use of compressed load-bearing 100% RAC construction units would help to achieve sustainability in construction.

1. Introduction

Concrete is one of the most used construction materials [1] with annual consumption reaching an all-time high of 10 billion m3 [2] around the globe. Due to the several advantages this material offers as compared to the other competitors [3] and the development going on around the globe, concrete production is further expected to increase in the coming decades. This increasing trend in concrete production warrants an increase in the demand for aggregates which constitute almost 75% of the total volume of concrete [4,5]. An estimate shows the consumption of 48.3 billion tons of natural aggregates worldwide annually, and it is expected that this demand will be increased two times in the next two to three decades [6]. Along with the increasing demand for concrete constituents for producing new concrete, there is another issue of the generation of a large volume of waste concrete [4]. This waste concrete is being produced either from the demolition of existing infrastructure which has reached its design life, or which is damaged due to natural disasters. Further, the restructuring or up-gradation plans of existing structures due to the rapid infrastructure development and urbanization of the 21st century are the other major sources of waste concrete [5]. Effective disposal of waste concrete has become a serious concern due to the environmental threats that it poses and the increased demand for landfills. Both of the above-mentioned issues need to be tackled effectively to manage the infrastructure needs of future generations while preserving the natural resources of aggregates and protecting the environment, hence making the concrete more sustainable.
Recycling waste concrete as the source of Recycled Aggregates (RA) and their use in new concrete provides a single solution to both the problems of increasing demand for natural aggregates and the issues related to the disposal of waste concrete, and it has been studied by several researchers over the past few decades [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. However, the research on the incorporation of recycled concrete aggregates in concrete shows, in general, a negative impact on both the mechanical and durability properties of the resulting concrete. This is due to the higher porosity of recycled aggregates resulting from the presence of mortar particles in RA and a weaker interfacial transition zone (ITZ) between RA and cement paste in new concrete due to the mortar attached to RA [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,16]. To counter this problem, researchers have proposed two basic solutions based on their extensive experimentation. The first solution is to improve the RA by involving several techniques [17] such as mechanical treatment [18], pre-soaking in acidic solution [19], thermo-mechanical treatment [20,21], and different surface treatments such as carbonation [22], soaking in sodium silicate [23] or nano-silica [24]. However, these techniques are generally not energy and cost-efficient or environment-friendly [5,17]. The second solution proposed by the researcher is to limit the percentage of replacement of Natural Aggregates (NA) by RA or an increased dosage of cement to obtain an acceptable level of mechanical and durability performance.
A detailed review of the literature [25] showed that most of the past studies related to the recycling of concrete as aggregates deal with only recycled coarse aggregates (RCA). There is still hesitation in the use of recycled fine aggregates (RFA) in concrete [26] mainly because of an increased negative impact on the properties of the resulting concrete which is due to the higher amount of residual cement and attached mortar in RFA as compared to RCA. Increased use of RFA in Recycled Aggregate Concrete (RAC) leads to higher cement demand for achieving the same target strength of concrete. Therefore, the recommended dosage of RFA has been limited to 20 to 30% of the total fine aggregates volume [27,28]. However, RFA and RCA are produced in almost equal proportions during the recycling process, i.e., about 50% of the volume of crushed material is the fraction having a maximum particle size of 4 mm [27]. However, recently there is an increased focus of research on the incorporation of RFA in concrete [25,29,30,31,32,33,34], and fewer studies have investigated the RAC with 100% recycled aggregates (both RFA and RCA) [26,35]. Therefore, there is a need to investigate ways to efficiently incorporate the fine fraction of the recycled concrete in the design of sustainable concrete.
One of the factors which affects the properties of concrete is the casting methodology. The conventional casting methodology, i.e., compacting through vibrations during casting, results in an increased cement requirement to achieve the same target strength of RAC as compared to Natural Aggregate Concrete (NAC) [36]. To overcome this requirement, several researchers have been proposing the use of the compression casting technique (CCT), especially in the precast industry. It improves the packing of concrete, reduces the porosity, and hence increases both the mechanical and durability performance of the resulting RAC with a reduced cement consumption [16,37,38,39,40,41]. In one such study, the effect of CCT, nano silica, and their combination for improving the RAC was investigated by Liang et al. [16]. Both macro- and micro-level examinations of the resulting RAC were conducted. It was concluded that the CCT can be effectively used to reduce the total porosity of the RAC and the pore ratio along the ITZ. The effectiveness of CCT for improving concrete was also shown by Wu et al. [42] for rubberized concrete. They found an improved stress–strain behavior of rubberized concrete due to the application of CCT and concluded that through CCT, the same mechanical properties as those of uncompressed NAC can be achieved for the concrete containing 30% rubber aggregates in replacement to NCA.
This study focused on tackling the issues related to the incorporation of 100% RA (fine and coarse) in concrete by taking advantage of the CCT. RAC containing 100% RA is prepared for a target strength of 15 MPa, and the effect of casting pressure, cement dosage, and the ratio of fine to coarse fraction of RA on the physical and mechanical properties of the resulting RAC is investigated. The results are compared with the specimens prepared using the conventional vibration approach to demonstrate the effectiveness of CCT. A target strength of 15 MPa was selected as this satisfies the minimum strength requirement of most of the standards related to masonry units [43].
The main focus of this study is to make the concrete recycling process eco-efficient and sustainable by investigating the possibility of developing RAC containing 100% RA by the combined use of RFA and RCA. The literature review indicated that there is a lack of research on the use of 100% RA (RCA and RFA) for the production of new concrete; either more of the research focus was on the use of RCA in RAC, or it focused on the separate investigation of RCA and RFA incorporation because of the durability issues associated with RA. The latest research studies [39,40] prove the potential use of CCT for improving the RAC; however, there is a paucity of research on its utilization for developing concrete containing 100% RA with the minimal use of cement. Furthermore, there is no study showing the effect of varying pressure levels of CCT and the mix ratio of RFA and RCA on the properties of RAC. Hence, this study investigates the effect of varying casting pressure, mix ratio of recycled aggregates and cement content on the mechanical properties of resulting concrete with an aim to develop 15 MPa strength of concrete having 100% RA, for its possible utilization in the precast industry to make eco-friendly masonry units. Currently, 82.5 billion burnt clay bricks are being produced in Pakistan annually from more than 18,000 brick kilns [44], and the brick manufacturing industry is causing serious environmental and health issues and air pollution resulting in smog, particularly in winter [45,46]. The findings of this study could be helpful in solving such issues by introducing an eco-friendly material option for the manufacturing of concrete masonry units (bricks) as an alternative to burnt clay bricks.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Laboratory-tested (crushed) concrete cubes and cylinders (refer to Figure 1) having compressive strength in the range of 21 to 28 MPa were collected and passed through jaw and roller crushers to produce RA of maximum 12 mm size. The process of RA production is shown in Figure 2. Selected physical and mechanical tests such as bulk density, water absorption, abrasion resistance, and impact value tests were performed on fine and coarse aggregates following ASTM/BS standards to characterize them. The results of these tests have been presented in Table 1. The gradation curves for RFA and RCA are plotted as shown in Figure 3A,B, which indicates that both RA meet the gradation criteria prescribed in ASTM C33 [47]. The bulk density and specific gravity of RA are lesser than that of NA, while the abrasion value and water absorption are higher.
For this study, river sand and crushed stones were used as Natural Fine Aggregates (NFA) and Natural Coarse Aggregates (NCA), respectively. The properties of NFA and NCA are given in Table 1. Gradation curves of NCA and NFA are shown in Figure 3C,D, respectively, indicating that both aggregates satisfy the grading criteria given in ASTM C33. To prepare all concrete compositions, Ordinary Portland cement in conformance with ASTM C150 [48] was used. The chemical composition and physical properties of the cement are provided in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively.

2.2. Mix Proportions

A total of 28 different concrete compositions were prepared and tested in this study. NCA and RCA were used in Saturated Surface Dry (SSD) condition. In the trial compositions, it was observed that by using RA in dry state and adding the additional amount of water to cater the absorption factor, 28 to 33% of the water added as absorption factor was expelled under applied pressure resulting in reducing the effective w/c ratio (lesser than the required w/c for hydration process) resulting in negative impact on compressive strength. The details of all 28 concrete compositions are given in Table 4. The concrete compositions were designated as RAC, NAC, F, C, and V for recycled aggregate concrete, natural aggregate concrete, fine aggregates, coarse aggregate, and compaction by vibration, respectively. For instance, for RAC-30F70C concrete composition, “RAC” represents recycled aggregate concrete, 30F denotes 30% of fine aggregates, and 70C shows 70% of coarse aggregates.

2.3. Preparation of Specimens

Cylindrical specimens of 150 mm height and 75 mm diameter were cast by CCT and conventional method of casting (i.e., compaction by vibration). For CCT, metallic mold as shown in Figure 4 was prepared which consists of 3 parts. Part 1: a hollow cylindrical tube of height 275 mm and internal diameter 75 mm; Part 2: an end block (to be fixed on one end). In order to avoid development of pore water pressure during casting, small holes were provided in this part at three locations to release the squeezed-out/expelled water due to the applied pressure; Part 3: a plunger which is used to apply pressure on material filled in part 1 of the mold.
After preparation, the concrete was poured in the mold in two layers. To apply required casting pressure on specimen, load was applied through plunger with the help of universal testing machine. The process of sample preparation by CCT is presented in Figure 5. To optimize the value of the casting pressure to be applied, experiments were conducted in which specimens were prepared at various casting pressures varying from 10 MPa to 45 MPa and the corresponding densities were measured. From the results obtained, it was observed that the density of concrete compressed specimen was increased with the increase in casting pressure as shown in Figure 6. Hence, the lower limit of 25 MPa was decided based on the aspects related to sample making, while the upper limit of 45 MPa was decided based on the facts related to infrastructure availability to apply such pressure and field applications. After applying and maintaining casting pressure for 15 s, the sample was extruded from the mold. For the purpose of comparison, samples from each concrete composition were also prepared by the conventional method of casting (i.e., by vibration). Firstly, all samples were air-dried for 24 h and then water-cured for 28 days. After curing of the specimens, they were cut to required height of 150 mm with the help of concrete cutter.

2.4. Testing Procedures

In this study, the performance of test specimens made using CCT and conventional compaction technique for different concrete compositions was evaluated based on the four properties, i.e., density, compressive strength, elastic modulus, and ultrasonic pulse velocity. Three specimens of each type of concrete composition were tested and the average result of each property has been reported in this study.

2.4.1. Density

After preparing test specimens using the compression casting technique and conventional method, the weight and length of each sample were determined after 24 h of casting to find the density of concrete. The following relation has been used to calculate the density of each cylinder.
ρ = m v ,
where ρ is the density of the specimen (kg/m3), m is the mass of specimen (kg), and v is the volume of specimen (m3).

2.4.2. Compressive Strength Test

Compressive strength tests were performed after 28 days of curing of concrete samples in accordance with ASTM C39 [49] specifications. Displacement-controlled compression tests were performed on Universal Testing Machine (UTM) of maximum loading capacity of 1000 kN at a loading rate of 0.5 mm/min as shown in Figure 7.

2.4.3. Modulus of Elasticity Test

Modulus of elasticity of concrete in compression (Ec) was determined in accordance with ASTM C469 [50]. Two strain gauges were pasted on the surface of each test specimen at 180° to measure the compressive strain as shown in Figure 8. Displacement-controlled test was performed using load cell of 500 kN capacity connected with UTM at loading rate of 0.5 mm/min. Strain gauges and load cell were connected to data acquisition system for data recording. Figure 9 shows the testing setup to conduct modulus of elasticity test in compression. To measure Ec, slope of the stress–strain curve was calculated by using the following relation as per ASTM C469 [50].
E c = S 2 S 1 2 0.000050 ,
where Ec is static modulus of elasticity in compression (MPa), S2 is the stress (MPa) corresponding to 40% of the ultimate load, S1 is the stress (MPa) corresponding to the longitudinal strain of 50 µ, and ∈2 is the longitudinal strain at stress, S2.

2.4.4. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity Test

The ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) test was performed following ASTM C597 [51]. To determine the UPV value of each test specimen, standard UPV apparatus was used as shown in Figure 10. As per standard procedure, the time to travel by the wave between transmitter and receiver placed at the ends of the specimen is measured using standard device, and then based on length of each specimen, UPV is calculated using Equation (3).
V = L T ,
where V is the pulse velocity (m/s), L is the distance between the centers of transducers (m), and T is transmission time (s). The calculated values of UPV were used to rate the quality of concrete sample. The criteria regarding the quality of concrete as suggested in previous studies [52,53] has been used in this study.

3. Results and Discussion

In this section, the results of each test performed are presented and discussed in detail. Table 5 summarizes the test results of all 28 different concrete mixes. As mentioned earlier, for each concrete composition, three samples were tested, and the average values were plotted and presented in this paper. In the table, ‘A.R’ stands for aspect ratio of the specimen.

3.1. Density of Concrete

The density of concrete was measured after 24 h of casting to analyze the degree of compaction of various concrete compositions prepared using different techniques. The density of concrete RAC-30F70C with 10% cement content ranges from 2073 to 2201 kg/m3 for applied pressure of 25 MPa to 45 MPa, while for concrete RAC-40F60C with 10% cement, the range is from 2133 to 2233 kg/m3. Similarly, for 15% cement content, these values were varied from 2156 to 2278 kg/m3 and 2181 to 2277 kg/m3 for RAC-30F70C and RAC-40F60C, respectively. The density of RAC tends to increase with the increase in the applied pressure as shown in Figure 11a, and this is mainly attributed to the improved packing of concrete resulting in reduced porosity. Figure 11b shows a similar trend for NAC samples cast using CCT. The density of NAC cast using CCT was higher than that of RAC having similar composition. The density of concrete specimens prepared using the conventional vibration method was 2068 kg/m3 and 2221 kg/m3 for RAC-30F70C and RAC-40F60C, respectively, with 10% of cement. Similarly, for 15% cement contents, these values were 2230 kg/m3 and 2265 kg/m3 for 30F70C and 40F60C, respectively. These values are comparable to that of samples cast by CCT.

3.2. Compressive Strength

The compressive strength of all concrete compositions for the aspect ratio (AR) of 1 and 2 is summarized in Table 5. Figure 12 shows the compressive strength of RAC and NAC specimens with the aspect ratio of 1 and 2 containing 10 and 15% of cement contents. It is depicted from the results presented in Figure 12a that the specimens prepared using 10% cement content could not achieve the target strength of 15 MPa. However, with the increase in the cement content to 15%, RAC-40F60C and RAC-30F70C under the applied pressure of 25 and 35 MPa, respectively, achieved the target strength. The decrease in the compressive strength at 45 MPa casting pressure was due to the expulsion of water resulting in unavailability of a sufficient amount of water required for the hydration process. For the specimen having an aspect ratio of 1, RAC-40F60C achieved the target strength for all applied pressure at the cement content of 10% as shown in Figure 12b. Results presented in Figure 12c,d for NAC specimens at various contents of cement show that most of the concretes achieved the target strength of 15 MPa except for NAC-30F70C prepared using the model with an aspect ratio of 2 and 10% of cement. Furthermore, it is also observed that concrete compositions with the use of NA exhibited higher strength compared to RA which is mainly attributed to the inferior properties of RA. With the increase in the cement content to 15% using 30:70 ratio of fine to coarse aggregates, all tested specimens achieved the target compressive strength of 15 MPa except RAC specimens prepared under the applied pressure of 45 MPa as shown in Figure 12; this is due to the fact discussed above related to the expulsion of water. The effect of the sample aspect ratio on the compressive strength is also evident in the results. The compressive strength observed for the specimens with an AR of 1 was more as compared to the one with an AR of 2. This fact is of great importance when such a concrete will be used in the manufacturing of masonry units of standard size generally having an aspect ratio less than 1.

3.3. Modulus of Elasticity in Compression (Ec)

Figure 13a,b shows the modulus of elasticity of the specimens using cement contents of 10% and 15%, respectively. For RAC compositions, the highest Ec value of 21.47 GPa was exhibited by composition 30F70C having 15% cement cast under the applied pressure of 45 MPa. Improvement in the E-value was observed with the increase of casting pressure from 25 MPa to 45 MPa and cement content from 10 to 15%. The modulus of elasticity of RAC specimens cast by conventional technique were also presented in the same figure. The positive effect of CCT was observed on the E-value as compared to the conventional casting technique. It may be noted that NACs showed the highest modulus of elasticity for all compositions, and observations were in line with the compressive strength results.

3.4. Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity (UPV)

UPV values of RAC and NAC specimens prepared by CCT are presented in Table 5. The higher value of UPV shows that lesser time is required for the signal to travel which indicates poor quality of concrete and vice versa. The criteria regarding the quality of concrete based on UPV values as suggested by [52,53] has been used in this study. Accordingly, the quality of various RAC and NAC mixes is also highlighted in Table 5. It is important to mention here that the proposed criteria to assess the quality of concrete was based on the conventional casting technique. The same approach has been used to check the quality of concrete prepared through CCT. The quality of most of the RAC mixes was ranked as good with a few exceptions, while the quality of NAC mixes was found to be excellent or good as described in Table 5. For RAC mixes for which the quality indicator was poor, lower compressive strength was also reported for these compositions.

3.5. Observations

Based on the results presented in Section 3, the following observations were made.
  • Concrete specimens prepared using CCT showed improvement in the various properties, such as compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, and quality assessment through UPV with the increase in the casting pressure. Accordingly, to prepare RAC mix using CCT, a higher casting pressure is recommended to obtain the improvement in the mechanical performance.
  • RA and NA were used to prepare the concrete using 30:70 and 40:60 ratios of fine to coarse aggregates, respectively. The density and other mechanical properties of NAC were higher than RAC. Old mortar attached to RA increases the porosity which results in reducing the density and mechanical performance of RAC. Figure 14a,b show the influence of proportion of RFA and RCA on the compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of RAC, respectively. The compressive strength and E-value exhibited by the RAC using 40:60 ratio of RFA to RCA was higher than the other mix ratio (i.e., 30:70). Therefore, it is suggested to use 40% of RFA and 60% of RCA to prepare the RAC with the use of 100% RAs.
  • Two different dosages of cement were used to prepare the concrete compositions. For RAC, the compressive strength as well as the modulus of elasticity of concrete tend to increase with the increase in cement contents as is evident from Figure 14a,b. A slight improvement in the density of concrete was also observed with increasing cement content.

4. Analytical Modeling

In the past studies, based on experimental studies, analytical models were developed to predict compressive strength and elastic modulus of RAC prepared by partial replacement of NA with RA. However, no analytical model is available to estimate the mechanical properties of RAC with 100% replacement of NA with RFA and RCA. Moreover, the existing analytical models for RAC and NAC were based on the experimental data obtained from the specimens prepared using the conventional casting technique. In this section of the paper, the existing analytical models have been analyzed using the experimental data presented in this study, and novel analytical models have been proposed by considering the effect of 100% replacement of NA with RFA and RCA and the compression casting technique.

4.1. Analytical Model for Compressive Strength Based on Density of Concrete

From the existing literature, most relevant models for the prediction of compressive strength based on density of concrete were selected for RAC and NAC. The details of selected models are presented in Table 6. Based on the results of density and compressive strength presented in Table 5 of this study, the selected models were evaluated. The accuracy of models was assessed based on two statistical parameters, average absolute error (AAE) and mean (M) calculated using Equations (4) and (5), respectively. The AAE indicates the overall accuracy of the model and can have a value from zero to infinity, with value zero showing that the model is perfect. The second parameter, mean (M), represents the average overestimation or underestimation. If the value of M is less than one, it means the model underestimates the results, and if it is more than one, it means the model overestimates the results.
AAE = i = 1 N ( exp i ana i ) / exp i N ,
M = i = 1 N ana i / exp i N ,
As shown in Figure 15, the analytical models of Xiao et al. [54] and Lim et al. [55] highly overestimated the results with AAE more than 100%. This difference is due to the different nature of concrete for which these models were developed as compared to the one analyzed in this study. For this reason, new models were proposed for RAC and NAC separately based on the regression analysis of results presented in Table 5. The proposed models are presented as Equations (6) and (7) to predict the compressive strength based on the density of RAC and NAC, respectively.
f c = 0.064 ρ 123.4 ,
f c = 0.089 ρ 193.0 ,
where f c is the compressive strength in MPa, and ρ is the mass density in kg/m3. The proposed Equations (6) and (7) were evaluated against the experimental data presented in this study as shown in Figure 15a,b. The proposed equations predicted the results with acceptable accuracy, with AAE less than or close to 15%.

4.2. Analytical Model for Elastic Modulus Based on Compressive Strength and Density of Concrete

The existing models developed to predict the modulus of elasticity of RAC and NAC based on the compressive strength and density were summarized in Table 7. These models were used to calculate the E values based on the experimental data provided in Table 5 and were evaluated based on statistical parameters “AAE and M”. Experimental and analytical results based on the existing models for NAC and RAC were presented in Figure 16a,b, respectively. It can be observed from the results that existing models could not predict the modulus of elasticity of compressed concrete prepared using RFA and RCA. However, two models developed by Lim et al. [55] and Antonio et al. [56] for NAC predicted the elastic modulus with acceptable accuracy (AAE of 12.7% and 9.7%, respectively). By using the approach of Lim et al. [55], analytical models for compressed RAC and NAC have been proposed using linear regression analysis of the results of this study and presented in Equations (8) and (9), respectively.
E = 4300 f c ρ 2400 2.88 ,
E = 5100 f c ρ 2400 2.027 ,
where E is the elastic modulus of concrete in MPa, f c is the compressive strength in MPa, and ρ is the mass density in kg/m3. The proposed models were used to predict the E value of concrete and the results were plotted as shown in Figure 16a,b, respectively. The proposed equations predicted the results with reasonable accuracy of AAE less than 5%.

4.3. Relationship between Compressive Strength and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity

The ultrasonic pulse velocity test is used to assess the quality of the concrete. Researchers in the past have developed relationships between ultrasonic pulse velocity and compressive strength of the concrete. From the existing literature, most relevant models for the prediction of compressive strength of NAC based on UPV value were selected as summarized in Table 8. The analytical results obtained by employing proposed equations and experimental results have been presented in Figure 17a,b for RAC and NAC, respectively, prepared by CCT. The AAE for the results obtained through the selected models for RAC was more than 15%, indicating the inability of models to predict the compressive strength of RAC prepared by CCT having 100% RAs. Similarly, for NAC, the minimum AAE was 12.6% for the Kurtulus and Bozkurt [60] model. Due to the inability of existing analytical models for the precise prediction of the results for RAC and NAC prepared through CCT, models have been proposed based on the linear relation between UPV and f c as suggested by Qasrawi et al. [61]. The following expressions can be used to predict the compressive strength of RAC and NAC based on the UPV test data, respectively.
f c = 9.05 UPV 20.86 ,
f c = 12.98 UPV 31.96 ,
where f c is the compressive strength in MPa, and UPV is the ultrasonic pulse velocity in km/s. Compressive strength of RAC and NAC was calculated using the proposed analytical models and the comparison between experimental and analytical results were presented in Figure 17a,b. The proposed equations predicted the results with reasonable accuracy of AAE 10.6%, and 4.4% for Equations (10) and (11), respectively.

4.4. Relationship between Elastic Modulus and Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity

From the existing literature, an analytical model as presented in Equation (12) developed by Kim et al. [63] for NAC was used to predict the elastic modulus of concrete from the UPV values and evaluated based on the results presented in Table 5. The comparison of experimental and analytical results is shown in Figure 18a,b for RAC and NAC prepared using CCT, respectively, where it is clear that the existing model is not able to predict the results for compressed RAC accurately. The AAE values for RAC and NAC were 66% and 17.5%, respectively, indicating the inability of the model to predict the elastic modulus. Similar analytical models to predict elastic modulus of compressed RAC and NAC have been proposed using linear regression analysis and are presented in Equations (13) and (14), respectively, where E is the elastic modulus in GPa and UPV is the ultrasonic pulse velocity in km/s.
E = 1.7617 × e 0.6333 × UPV ,
E = 1.668 × e 0.5117 × UPV ,
E = 2.999 × e 0.4725 × UPV ,
The results obtained through the proposed analytical models were compared with the experimental ones and presented in Figure 18a,b for RAC and NAC, respectively. The proposed equations predicted the results with reasonable accuracy of AAE 6.8% and 7.7% for RAC and NAC, respectively.
The above-presented experimental results have highlighted the positive impact of CCT on the mechanical performance of RAC which is in line with the findings of other studies available in the literature on different concrete regarding compression casting. For instance, Kazmi et al. [40] worked to develop green and eco-friendly concrete products using waste tire rubber and recycled aggregates and by employing compression casting. The study found that the RAC prepared by compression casting and containing 10–20% crumb rubber in replacement of coarse aggregates exhibited compressive strength and elastic modulus quite similar to traditional concrete without crumb rubber. Wang et al. [41] developed layered compression casting and showed that compared to traditional concrete, the modulus of elasticity and the compressive strength of concrete prepared by layered compression casting are improved up to almost 50% and 100%, respectively. Based on the findings of the research study presented in this paper and similar works reported in the literature, the use of compressing casting by the precast concrete industry for the manufacturing of concrete products of fully RAC having desired mechanical performance would promote the maximum recycling of C&D waste. This will help to achieve sustainability in the construction sector by conserving natural resources of concrete aggregates, avoiding environmental pollution caused by C&D waste, and reducing space wastage in landfills. In this research work, the RA were produced from the waste concrete of compressive strength range 21–28 MPa; investigation of the impact of parent concrete strength [64] of RA along with compression casting on the performance of fully RAC could be an interesting research topic for future studies.

5. Conclusions

In this contribution, a comprehensive experimental study has been conducted to observe the effect of the compression casting technique (CCT) on the physical and mechanical properties of RAC prepared using 100% recycled aggregates (both fine and coarse). The effect of applied pressure, ratio of RCA and RFA, casting technique and cement contents on the mechanical properties of RAC was assessed and compared with NAC. Moreover, analytical models based on the experimental data have been proposed to predict the mechanical properties of RAC prepared by CCT. The findings of this study made it possible to draw the following conclusions:
  • The compression casting technique showed a positive impact on the mechanical properties of RAC. On average, considering all compositions tested in this study, compressive strength and elastic modulus of RAC were increased by 20–80% and 15–50%, respectively, by changing the casting method from vibration to compression casting.
  • A total of 100% RAC prepared by CCT at a casting pressure of 35 MPa and cement content of 15% was able to achieve compressive strength greater than 100% NAC prepared by the conventional method of casting [i.e., through vibration].
  • For CCT, the value of casting pressure is of great importance with respect to density of resulting concrete. However, the decision regarding the value of casting pressure to be used must depend upon the target strength of the resulting RAC.
  • For the manufacturing of masonry units of an aspect ratio equal or less than one, CCT made it possible to design a concrete of target compressive strength of 15 MPa containing significantly less quantity of cement (i.e., 10%) and 100% RAC (40% fine + 60% coarse).
  • The ultrasonic pulse velocity value exhibited by 100% RAC was increased by changing the casting technique. Further, with the increase of casting pressure in CCT, UPV value was increased, indicating improvement in quality of concrete.
  • The mechanical properties of RAC and NAC compositions prepared by two ratios of fine and coarse aggregates [i.e., 30:70 and 40:60] and two cement contents [10% and 15%] in this study clearly indicated that the effect CCT depends upon is the mix ratio of coarse and fine aggregates as well as cement dosage.
  • Analytical models to predict different properties of RAC and NAC prepared by CCT were developed based on the regression analysis of the results obtained in this study. The proposed models were evaluated based on statistical parameters average absolute error (AAE) and the mean (M). The proposed analytical models were found to be able to predict the compressive strength and elastic modulus of RAC with reasonable accuracy as compared to the analytical models already existing in literature.
  • In this study, the feasibility of using RAC incorporating 100% RA prepared by CCT for the manufacturing of masonry units is highlighted. However, only the effect of casting pressure is investigated. In order to be in line with field practice for the manufacturing concrete masonry unit, further investigation is recommended to be carried out to improve the effect of CCT by developing a setup to impart vibration to mold and compaction through compression at the same time.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.H. and M.T.; methodology, R.H.; validation, R.H., M.T., and Z.-u.-N.; formal analysis, S.S., S.M.S.K. and M.J.M.; investigation, R.H. and Z.-u.-N.; resources, S.M.S.K. and M.J.M.; data curation, R.H. and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.-u.-N., S.S., S.M.S.K. and M.J.M.; writing—review and editing, R.H., S.M.S.K., and M.J.M.; visualization, S.M.S.K. and M.T.; supervision, R.H.; project administration, R.H. and M.T.; funding acquisition, R.H. and Z.-u.-N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Higher Education Commission (HEC) Pakistan, under HEC-NRPU research grant number 9764.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rohden, B.; Garcez, M.R. Increasing the sustainability potential of a reinforced concrete building through design strategies: Case study. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2018, 9, e00174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Miller, S.A.; Horvath, A.; Monteiro, P.J. Readily implementable techniques can cut annual CO2 emissions from the production of concrete by over 20%. Environ. Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 074029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Munir, M.J.; Abbas, S.; Qazi, A.U.; Nehdi, M.L.; Kazmi, S.M.S. Role of test method in detection of alkali–silica reactivity of concrete aggregates. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Constr. Mater. 2018, 171, 203–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kazmi, S.M.S.; Munir, M.J.; Wu, Y.-F.; Lin, X.; Ahmad, M.R. Investigation of thermal performance of concrete incorporating different types of recycled coarse aggregates. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 270, 121433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Savva, P.; Ioannou, S.; Oikonomopoulou, K.; Nicolaides, D.; Petrou, M.F. A mechanical treatment method for recycled aggregates and its effect on recycled aggregate-based concrete. Materials 2021, 14, 2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Anike, E.E.; Saidani, M.; Ganjian, E.; Tyrer, M.; Olubanwo, A.O. The potency of recycled aggregate in new concrete: A review. Constr. Innov. 2019, 19, 594–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nedeljković, M.; Visser, J.; Šavija, B.; Valcke, S.; Schlangen, E. Use of fine recycled concrete aggregates in concrete: A critical review. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 38, 102196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Munir, M.J.; Kazmi, S.M.S.; Wu, Y.-F.; Lin, X.; Ahmad, M.R. Development of a novel compressive strength design equation for natural and recycled aggregate concrete through advanced computational modeling. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 55, 104690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Upshaw, M.; Cai, C.S. Critical review of recycled aggregate concrete properties, improvements, and numerical models. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2020, 32, 03120005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tam, V.W.; Soomro, M.; Evangelista, A.C.J. A review of recycled aggregate in concrete applications (2000–2017). Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 172, 272–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Munir, M.J.; Kazmi, S.M.S.; Wu, Y.-F. Unified strength model for spiral steel confined concrete columns. ACI Struct. J. 2021, 119, 247–255. [Google Scholar]
  12. Riaz, M.R.; Hameed, R.; Ilya, M.; Akram, A.; Siddiqi, Z.A. Mechanical characterization of recycled aggregate concrete. Pak. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2015, 16, 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  13. Munir, M.J.; Kazmi, S.M.S.; Wu, Y.-F.; Lin, X. Axial stress-strain performance of steel spiral confined acetic acid immersed and mechanically rubbed recycled aggregate concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 34, 101891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sangthongtong, A.; Semvimol, N.; Rungratanaubon, T.; Duangmal, K.; Joyklad, P. Mechanical Properties of Pervious Recycled Aggregate Concrete Reinforced with Sackcloth Fibers (SF). Infrastructures 2023, 8, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kazmi, S.M.S.; Munir, M.J.; Wu, Y.-F.; Lin, X.; Ashiq, S.Z. Development of unified elastic modulus model of natural and recycled aggregate concrete for structural applications. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2023, 18, e01873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liang, Z.; Hu, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, X.; Hu, B.; Guo, M. Improving recycled aggregate concrete by compression casting and nano-silica. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2022, 11, 1273–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bahraq, A.A.; Jose, J.; Shameem, M.; Maslehuddin, M. A review on treatment techniques to improve the durability of recycled aggregate concrete: Enhancement mechanisms, performance and cost analysis. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 55, 104713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dimitriou, G.; Savva, P.; Petrou, M.F. Enhancing mechanical and durability properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 158, 228–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Katz, A. Treatments for the improvement of recycled aggregate. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2004, 16, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Pawluczuk, E.; Kalinowska-Wichrowska, K.; Boltryk, M.; Jiménez, J.R.; Fernández, J.M. The influence of heat and mechanical treatment of concrete rubble on the properties of recycled aggregate concrete. Materials 2019, 12, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bru, K.; Touzé, S.; Bourgeois, F.; Lippiatt, N.; Ménard, Y. Assessment of a microwave-assisted recycling process for the recovery of high-quality aggregates from concrete waste. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2014, 126, 90–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Radević, A.; Despotović, I.; Zakić, D.; Orešković, M.; Jevtić, D. Influence of acid treatment and carbonation on the properties of recycled concrete aggregate. Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. 2018, 24, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Katkhuda, H.; Shatarat, N. Shear behavior of reinforced concrete beams using treated recycled concrete aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 125, 63–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zeng, W.; Zhao, Y.; Zheng, H.; Poon, C.S. Improvement in corrosion resistance of recycled aggregate concrete by nano silica suspension modification on recycled aggregates. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2020, 106, 103476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bu, C.; Liu, L.; Lu, X.; Zhu, D.; Sun, Y.; Yu, L.; OuYang, Y.; Cao, X.; Wei, Q. The Durability of Recycled Fine Aggregate Concrete: A Review. Materials 2022, 15, 1110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Singh, R.; Nayak, D.; Pandey, A.; Kumar, R.; Kumar, V. Effects of recycled fine aggregates on properties of concrete containing natural or recycled coarse aggregates: A comparative study. J. Build. Eng. 2022, 45, 103442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Villagrán-Zaccardi, Y.A.; Marsh, A.T.; Sosa, M.E.; Zega, C.J.; De Belie, N.; Bernal, S.A. Complete re- utilization of waste concretes–Valorisation pathways and research needs. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2022, 177, 105955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vintimilla, C.; Etxeberria, M. Limiting the maximum fine and coarse recycled aggregates -Type A used in structural concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 380, 131273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ju, M.; Park, K.; Park, W.J. Mechanical behavior of recycled fine aggregate concrete with high slump property in normal-and high-strength. Int. J. Concr. Struct. Mater. 2019, 13, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Al-Luhybi, A.S.; Aziz, I.A.; Mohammad, K.I. Experimental assessment of mechanical and physical performance of latex modified concrete with fine recycled aggregate. Structures 2023, 45, 1932–1938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Vlieger, J.D.; Boehme, L.; Blaakmeer, J.; Li, J. Buildability assessment of mortar with fine recycled aggregates for 3D printing. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 367, 130313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bayraktar, O.Y.; Kaplan, G.; Shi, J.; Benli, A.; Bodur, B.; Turkoglu, M. The effect of steel fiber aspect-ratio and content on the fresh, flexural, and mechanical performance of concrete made with recycled fine aggregate. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 368, 130497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, H.; Xiao, J.; Ding, T. Flexural performance of 3D-printed composite beams with ECC and recycled fine aggregate concrete: Experimental and numerical analysis. Eng. Struct. 2023, 283, 115865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wang, F.; Gao, D.; Xu, Z.; Zhang, T. Comparative study on axial compressive properties of steel fiber-reinforced recycled-fine-aggregate concrete tested by prism and cylinder specimens. Constr. Build. Mater. 2023, 367, 130311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Corinaldesi, V.; Moriconi, G. Influence of mineral additions on the performance of 100% recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 2869–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tabsh, S.W.; Abdelfatah, A.S. Influence of recycled concrete aggregates on strength properties of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 1163–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, X.; Chin, C.S.; Xia, J. Material characterization for sustainable concrete paving blocks. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Sakai, Y.; Tarekegne, B.T.; Kishi, T. Recycling of hardened cementitious material by pressure and control of volumetric change. J. Adv. Concr. Technol. 2016, 14, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hameed, R.; Nisa, Z.U.; Riaz, M.R.; Gillani, S.A.A. Effect of compression casting technique on the water absorption properties of concrete made using 100% recycled aggregates. Rev. Constr. 2022, 21, 387–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kazmi SM, S.; Munir, M.J.; Wu, Y.F. Application of waste tire rubber and recycled aggregates in concrete products: A new compression casting approach. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 167, 105353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, X.; Wang, J.; Kazmi, S.M.S.; Wu, Y.F. Development of new layered compression casting approach for concrete. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2022, 134, 104738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wu, Y.F.; Kazmi SM, S.; Munir, M.J.; Zhou, Y.; Xing, F. Effect of compression casting method on the compressive strength, elastic modulus and microstructure of rubber concrete. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 264, 121746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Waheed, A.; Azam, R.; Riaz, M.R.; Zawam, M. Mechanical and durability properties of fly-ash cement sand composite bricks: An alternative to conventional burnt clay bricks. Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. 2022, 7, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. ICIMOD. Brick Sector in Pakistan—Fact Sheet. Available online: https://lib.icimod.org/record/34683 (accessed on 15 February 2023).
  45. Habib, A.; Nasim, S.; Shahab, A. Charting Pakistan’s Air Quality Policy Landscape; International Growth Centre (IGC), London School of Economic and Political Science: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  46. Raza, W.; Saeed, S.; Saulat, H.; Gul, H.; Sarfraz, M.; Sonne, C.; Sohn, Z.H.; Brown, R.J.C.; Kim, K.-H. A review on the deteriorating situation of smog and its preventive measures in Pakistan. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 123676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. ASTM C33; Standard Specifications for Coarse Aggregates. ASTM International West Conshohocken: Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2018.
  48. ASTM C150; Standard Specification for Portland Cement. ASTM International West Conshohocken: Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2012.
  49. ASTM C39; Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens. ASTM International West Conshohocken: Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2021.
  50. ASTM C469; Standard Test Method for Static Modulus of Elasticity and Poisson’s Ratio of Concrete in Compression. ASTM International West Conshohocken: Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2022.
  51. ASTM C597; Standard Test Method for Pulse Velocity through Concrete. ASTM International West Conshohocken: Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2023.
  52. Leslie, J.R.; Cheesman, W.J. An ultrasonic method of studying deterioration and cracking in concrete structures. J. Am. Concr. Inst. 1949, 21, 17–36. [Google Scholar]
  53. Feldman, R.F. Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete; National Research Council of Canada, Division of Building Research: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  54. Xiao, J.-Z.; Li, J.-B.; Zhang, C. On relationships between the mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete: An overview. Mater. Struct. 2006, 39, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lim, J.C.; Ozbakkaloglu, T. Stress–strain model for normal-and light-weight concretes under uniaxial and triaxial compression. Constr. Build. Mater. 2014, 71, 492–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Cabral, A.E.B.; Schalch, V.; Dal Molin, D.C.C.; Ribeiro, J.L.D. Mechanical properties modeling of recycled aggregate concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2010, 24, 421–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Kakizaki, M.; Harada, M.; Soshiroda, T.; Kubota, S.; Ikeda, T.; Kasai, Y. Strength and elastic modulus of recycled aggregate concrete. In Proceedings of the 2nd international RILEM symposium on demolition and reuse of concrete and masonry, Tokyo, Japan, 17 November 1988; pp. 7–11. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ravindrarajah, R.S.; Tam, C.T. Properties of concrete made with crushed concrete as coarse aggregate. Mag. Concr. Res. 1985, 37, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. ACI Committee. Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete: (ACI 318-02) and Commentary (ACI 318R-02); American Concrete Institute: Farmington Hills, MI, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  60. Cengiz, K.; Ali, B. Determination of concrete compressive strength of the structures in Istanbul and Izmit Cities (Turkey) by combination of destructive and non-destructive methods. Int. J. Phys. Sci. 2011, 6, 3929–3932. [Google Scholar]
  61. Qasrawi, H.Y. Concrete strength by combined nondestructive methods simply and reliably predicted. Cem. Concr. Res. 2000, 30, 739–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Turgut, P. Evaluation of Ultrasonic Velocity Data Coming on the Field. In Proceedings of the International Conference on NDT in Relation to Structural Integrity for Nuclear and Pressurized Components, Seattle, DC, USA, 22–24 May 2004. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kim, W.; Jeong, K.; Choi, H.; Lee, T. Correlation Analysis of Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity and Mechanical Properties of Normal Aggregate and Lightweight Aggregate Concretes in 30–60 MPa Range. Materials 2022, 15, 2952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Munir, M.J.; Kazmi, S.M.S.; Wu, Y.-F.; Lin, X.; Ahmad, M.R. Development of novel design strength model for sustainable concrete columns: A new machine learning-based approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 357, 131988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Crushed samples of concrete as source of RA.
Figure 1. Crushed samples of concrete as source of RA.
Sustainability 15 08153 g001
Figure 2. Process of production of recycled concrete aggregates.
Figure 2. Process of production of recycled concrete aggregates.
Sustainability 15 08153 g002
Figure 3. Gradation curves of (A) RCA, (B) RFA, (C) NCA, and (D) NFA.
Figure 3. Gradation curves of (A) RCA, (B) RFA, (C) NCA, and (D) NFA.
Sustainability 15 08153 g003
Figure 4. Metallic mold prepared for compression casting.
Figure 4. Metallic mold prepared for compression casting.
Sustainability 15 08153 g004
Figure 5. Sample preparation under compression casting technique.
Figure 5. Sample preparation under compression casting technique.
Sustainability 15 08153 g005
Figure 6. Determination of applied pressure for CCT.
Figure 6. Determination of applied pressure for CCT.
Sustainability 15 08153 g006
Figure 7. Compression test on concrete cylinder.
Figure 7. Compression test on concrete cylinder.
Sustainability 15 08153 g007
Figure 8. Samples with strain gauges pasted on their surface.
Figure 8. Samples with strain gauges pasted on their surface.
Sustainability 15 08153 g008
Figure 9. Setup for modulus of elasticity test in compression.
Figure 9. Setup for modulus of elasticity test in compression.
Sustainability 15 08153 g009
Figure 10. UPV testing device.
Figure 10. UPV testing device.
Sustainability 15 08153 g010
Figure 11. Influence of casting technique and applied pressure on density of (a) RAC, and (b) NAC.
Figure 11. Influence of casting technique and applied pressure on density of (a) RAC, and (b) NAC.
Sustainability 15 08153 g011
Figure 12. Compressive strength of concrete specimens for (a) RAC with aspect ratio of 2, (b) RAC with aspect ratio of 1, (c) NAC with aspect ratio of 2, and (d) NAC with aspect ratio of 1.
Figure 12. Compressive strength of concrete specimens for (a) RAC with aspect ratio of 2, (b) RAC with aspect ratio of 1, (c) NAC with aspect ratio of 2, and (d) NAC with aspect ratio of 1.
Sustainability 15 08153 g012
Figure 13. Modulus of elasticity of concrete with (a) 10% of cement content, and (b) 15% of cement content.
Figure 13. Modulus of elasticity of concrete with (a) 10% of cement content, and (b) 15% of cement content.
Sustainability 15 08153 g013
Figure 14. Influence of recycled aggregates (RCA and RFA) on (a) compressive strength, and (b) elastic modulus.
Figure 14. Influence of recycled aggregates (RCA and RFA) on (a) compressive strength, and (b) elastic modulus.
Sustainability 15 08153 g014
Figure 15. Analysis of existing and proposed analytical models for compressive strength of (a) RAC prepared through CCT, and (b) NAC prepared through CCT [54,55].
Figure 15. Analysis of existing and proposed analytical models for compressive strength of (a) RAC prepared through CCT, and (b) NAC prepared through CCT [54,55].
Sustainability 15 08153 g015
Figure 16. Evaluation of existing and proposed analytical models for elastic modulus of (a) RAC and (b) NAC [55,56,57,58,59].
Figure 16. Evaluation of existing and proposed analytical models for elastic modulus of (a) RAC and (b) NAC [55,56,57,58,59].
Sustainability 15 08153 g016
Figure 17. Evaluation of existing and proposed analytical models between compressive strength and UPV for (a) RAC prepared through CCT, and (b) NAC prepared through CCT [60,61,62].
Figure 17. Evaluation of existing and proposed analytical models between compressive strength and UPV for (a) RAC prepared through CCT, and (b) NAC prepared through CCT [60,61,62].
Sustainability 15 08153 g017
Figure 18. Evaluation of existing and proposed relations between elastic modulus and UPV for (a) RAC prepared through CCT, and (b) NAC prepared through CCT [63].
Figure 18. Evaluation of existing and proposed relations between elastic modulus and UPV for (a) RAC prepared through CCT, and (b) NAC prepared through CCT [63].
Sustainability 15 08153 g018
Table 1. Physical and mechanical properties of recycled and natural aggregates.
Table 1. Physical and mechanical properties of recycled and natural aggregates.
PropertyRANA
CoarseFineCoarseFine
Bulk oven dry Specific Gravity2.262.052.842.70
Bulk SSD Specific Gravity2.442.282.862.75
Bulk Apparent Specific Gravity2.762.662.872.84
Water Absorption (%)7.9711.150.91.79
Moisture Content (%)2.375.320.91.2
Flakiness Index (%)14.1-19.6-
Elongation Index (%)21.25-44.1-
Bulk Density (kg/m3)1267133514411722
Los Angeles Abrasion Value (%)37.57-25.20
10% Fine Value, TFV (kN)184.36-199.57
Aggregate Crushing Value, ACV (%)20.80-22.55
Aggregate Impact Value, AIV (%)15.36-17.70
Table 2. Chemical composition of cement.
Table 2. Chemical composition of cement.
Chemical CompositionCaOSiO2Al2O3Fe2O3MgOSO3
62.6%20.8%5.06%3.27%2.56%1.57%
Table 3. Physical properties of cement.
Table 3. Physical properties of cement.
Physical PropertiesFinenessSoundnessInitial and Final SettingStandard Consistency
8%9 mm105–21530%
Table 4. Concrete mix proportions.
Table 4. Concrete mix proportions.
Sr. No.Concrete DesignationCement Content, % (kg/m3)Fine Aggregates, kg/m3Coarse Aggregates, kg/m3Water/Cement RatioApplied Pressure, MPa
1RAC-30F70C10 (195)58013550.525
235
345
415 (290)580135525
535
645
7RAC-40F60C10 (205)825123025
835
945
1015 (310)825123025
1135
1245
13NAC-30F70C10 (195)58013550.525
1435
1545
1615 (290)580135525
1735
1845
19NAC-40F60C10 (205)825123025
2035
2145
2215 (310)825123025
2335
2445
25RAC-30F70C-V10 (195)58013550.5Compaction by Vibration (Conventional method)
2615 (290)5801355
27RAC-40F60C-V10 (205)8251230
2815 (310)8251230
Table 5. Test results of density, compressive strength, elastic modulus, and ultrasonic pulse velocity.
Table 5. Test results of density, compressive strength, elastic modulus, and ultrasonic pulse velocity.
Sr. No.Concrete DesignationCement ContentApplied Pressure
MPa
Density
kg/m3
Compressive Strength, MPaElastic Modulus
MPa
Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity
A.R = 2A.R = 1Values
km/s
Quality
1RAC-30F70C10%2520736.629.09.23.337Questionable
23521376.711.5103.573Questionable
34522018.712.612.053.646Good
415%25215616.120.813.274.053Good
535221820.527.017.244.215Good
645227813.0416.721.473.580Questionable
7RAC-40F60C10%25213311.313.712.543.890Good
835217311.7616.012.784.091Good
945223311.8619.013.254.104Good
1015%25218117.8618.714.374.369Good
1135229318.8819.216.554.452Good
1245227718.5722.317.454.066Good
13NAC-30F70C10%25231811.8212.816.744.443Good
1435232813.613.518.514.463Good
1545239012.1716.722.874.602Excellent
1615%25232519.2925.425.1934.504Excellent
1735236820.7127.726.4924.626Excellent
1845241622.530.428.4724.716Excellent
19NAC-40F60C10%25233713.0514.514.8613.804Good
2035236314.6916.718.073.814Good
2145238315.2620.824.0373.969Good
2215%25236319.9222.420.5714.185Good
2335240622.8424.524.644.234Good
2445246020.6926.027.344.285Good
25RAC-30F70C-V10%Compaction by vibration20685.98.510.653.791Good
2615%223011.4315.213.183.995Good
27RAC-40F60C-V10%222112.1413.511.773.831Good
2815%226514.8317.414.823.890Good
Table 6. Analytical models for prediction of compressive strength based on density.
Table 6. Analytical models for prediction of compressive strength based on density.
Sr. No.ReferenceAnalytical ModelCasting Technique and Aggregate Type
1Xiao et al. [54] f c = 0.069 ρ 116.1 Conventional casting using recycled aggregates
2Lim et al. [55] f c = 21 w c 1 ρ 2400 1.6 Conventional casting using natural aggregates
Table 7. Existing analytical models for prediction of elastic modulus.
Table 7. Existing analytical models for prediction of elastic modulus.
Sr. No.ReferencePrediction EquationCasting Technique and
Aggregate Type
1Kakizaki et al. [57] E = 1.9 × 10 5 × ρ 2300 1.5 × f c 2000 Conventional casting and RA
2Antonio et al. [56] E = 2.85 × f c 0.63 Conventional casting and RA
3Ravindrarajahet al. [58] E = 7.77 × f c 0.33 Conventional casting and RA
4Antonio et al. [56] E = 4.55 × f c 0.5 Conventional casting and NA
5Lim et al. [55] E = 4400 × f c × ρ 2400 1.4 Conventional casting and NA
6ACI 318-02 [59] E = 0.0427 × f c × ρ 1.5 Conventional casting and NA
Table 8. Existing prediction models for compressive strength of concrete using UPV.
Table 8. Existing prediction models for compressive strength of concrete using UPV.
Sr. No.ReferencePrediction EquationCasting Technique and Aggregate Type
1Turgut [62] f c = 0.316 e 1.03 U P V Conventional casting and NA
2Kurtulus and Bozkurt [60] f c = 0.062 U P V 46.497 Conventional casting and NA
3Qasrawi et al. [61] f c = 36.72 U P V 129.077 Conventional casting and NA
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hameed, R.; Tahir, M.; Zaib-un-Nisa; Shahzad, S.; Kazmi, S.M.S.; Munir, M.J. Impact of Compression Casting Technique on the Mechanical Properties of 100% Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Sustainability 2023, 15, 8153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108153

AMA Style

Hameed R, Tahir M, Zaib-un-Nisa, Shahzad S, Kazmi SMS, Munir MJ. Impact of Compression Casting Technique on the Mechanical Properties of 100% Recycled Aggregate Concrete. Sustainability. 2023; 15(10):8153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108153

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hameed, Rashid, Muhammad Tahir, Zaib-un-Nisa, Shaban Shahzad, Syed Minhaj Saleem Kazmi, and Muhammad Junaid Munir. 2023. "Impact of Compression Casting Technique on the Mechanical Properties of 100% Recycled Aggregate Concrete" Sustainability 15, no. 10: 8153. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108153

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop