Causes of Consumer Materialistic and Green Value Conflict: A Systematic Literature Review
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design
- The document type selected in the search is articles published in the English language;
- The period of publication between 2011 and 2021. This publication period was chosen because the topic of the conflict between materialist and green values is new and unexplored. Since 2011, the number of articles published on this topic has been increasing.
- The Web of Science database search strings “Dissonant cognitions in consumption” and “Consumer materialistic values and green values”;
- The ScienceDirect database search strings “Dissonant cognitions in consumption” and “Causes of consumer materialistic and green value conflict”;
- The Emerald database search strings “Dissonant cognitions in consumption” and “Causes of consumer materialistic and green value conflict”;
- The Scopus database search string “Dissonant cognitions in consumption” and “Consumer materialistic values and green values”.
2.2. Analysis and Synthesis
3. Results
3.1. Distribution and Evolution of the Topic
3.2. Content Analysis
4. Discussion
5. Policy Implications
6. Conclusions and Directions for Further Research
7. Limitations
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
References
- UN, Sustainable Development Goals. 2021. Available online: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-consumption-production/ (accessed on 21 February 2022).
- Dhandra, T.K. Achieving triple dividend through mindfulness: More sustainable consumption, less unsustainable consumption and more life satisfaction. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 161, 83–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Séré de Lanauze, G.S.; Siadou-Martin, B. Dissonant cognitions: From psychological discomfort to motivation to change. J. Consum. Mark. 2019, 36, 565–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Islam, M.; Barnes, A.; Toma, L. An investigation into climate change skepticism among farmers. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 34, 137–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Helm, S.; Serido, J.; Ahn, S.; Ligon, V.; Shim, S. Materialist values, financial and pro-environmental behaviors, and well-being. Young Consum. 2019, 20, 264–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Strizhakova, Y.; Coulter, R.A. The “green” side of materialism in emerging BRIC and developed markets: The moderating role of global cultural identity. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2013, 30, 69–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Talukdar, N.; Yu, S. Do materialists care about sustainable luxury? Mark. Intell. Plan. 2020, 38, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kronrod, A.; Grinstein, A.; Wathieu, L. Go green! Should environmental messages be so assertive? J. Mark. 2012, 76, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kraisornsuthasinee, S.; Swierczek, F.W. Beyond consumption: The promising contribution of voluntary simplicity. Soc. Responsib. J. 2018, 14, 80–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lasarov, W.; Mai, R.; García de Frutos, N.; Egea, J.M.O.; Hoffmann, S. Counter-arguing as barriers to environmentally motivated consumption reduction: A multi-country study. Int. J. Res. Mark. 2019, 36, 281–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dholakia, U.; Jung, J.; Chowdhry, N. Should I buy this when I have so much? Reflection on personal possessions as an anticonsumption strategy. J. Public Policy Mark. 2018, 37, 260–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richins, M.L. Materialism, transformations expectations, and spending: Implications for credit use. J. Public Policy Mark. 2011, 30, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hurst, M.; Dittmar, H.; Bond, R.; Kasser, T. The relationship between materialistic values and environmental attitudes and behaviors: A meta-analysis. J. Environ. Psychol. 2013, 36, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maiteny, P.T. Mind in the gap: Summary of research exploring ‘inner’ influences on pro-sustainability learning and behavior. Environ. Educ. Res. 2002, 8, 299–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Furchheim, P.; Martin, C.; Morhart, F. Being green in a materialistic world: Consequences for subjective well-being. Psychol. Mark. 2020, 37, 114–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schröder, M.J.; McEachern, M.G. Consumer value conflicts surrounding ethical food purchase decisions: A focus on animal welfare. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2004, 28, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fitzmaurice, J.; Comegys, C. Materialism and social consumption. J. Mark. Theory Pract. 2006, 14, 287–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Richins, M.L.; Dawson, S. A consumer values orientation for materialism and its measurement: Scale development and validation. J. Consum. Res. 1992, 19, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kilbourne, W.E.; Pickett, G. How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. J. Bus. Res. 2008, 61, 885–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Festinger, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance; Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA, USA, 1957. [Google Scholar]
- Hinojosa, A.S.; Gardner, W.L.; Walker, H.J.; Cogliser, C.; Gullifor, D. A Review of Cognitive Dissonance Theory in Management Research. J. Manag. 2017, 43, 170–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Harmon-Jones, E.; Mills, J. An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory. In Cognitive Dissonance: Reexamining a Pivotal Theory in Psychology; Harmon-Jones, E., Ed.; American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2019; pp. 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chauhan, V.; Sagar, M. Consumer confusion: A systematic review and research directions. J. Consum. Mark. 2021, 38, 445–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makri, K.; Schlegelmilch, B.B.; Mai, R.; Dinhof, K. What we know about anticonsumption: An attempt to nail jelly to the wall. Psychol. Mark. 2020, 37, 177–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sesini, G.; Castiglioni, C.; Lozza, E. New Trends and Patterns in Sustainable Consumption: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burgers, C.; Brugman, B.C.; Boeynaems, A. Systematic literature reviews: Four applications for interdisciplinary research. J. Pragmat. 2019, 145, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ward, V.; House, A.; Hamer, S. Developing a framework for transferring knowledge into action: A thematic analysis of the literature. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 2009, 14, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Snyder, H. Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res. 2019, 104, 333–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liberati, A.; Altman, D.G.; Tetzlaff, J.; Mulrow, C.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Moher, D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and metanalyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fiske, S.T. Attention and weight in person perception: The impact of negative and extreme behavior. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1980, 38, 889–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miller, G.; Rathouse, K.; Scarles, C.; Holmes, K.; Tribe, J. Public understanding of sustainable tourism. Ann. Tour. Res. 2010, 37, 627–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dowsett, E.; Semmler, C.; Bray, H.; Ankeny, R.A.; Chur-Hansen, A. Neutralising the meat paradox: Cognitive dissonance, gender, and eating animals. Appetite 2018, 123, 280–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhattacharjee, A.; Berman, J.Z.; Reed, A. Tip of the hat, wag of the finger: How moral decoupling enables consumers to admire and admonish. J. Consum. Res. 2012, 39, 1167–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nisbet, E.C.; Cooper, K.E.; Garrett, R.K. The partisan Brain: How dissonant science messages lead conservatives and liberals to (Dis)Trust science. Ann. Am. Acad. Political Soc. Sci. 2015, 658, 6–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fransen, M.L.; Verlegh, P.W.; Kirmani, A.; Smit, E.G. A typology of consumer strategies for resisting advertising, and a review of mechanisms for countering them. Int. J. Advert. 2015, 34, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, M. A multidimensional analysis of public environmental concern in Canada. Can. Rev. Sociol. Rev. Can. De Sociol. 2013, 50, 453–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, E.; Hinsch, C. Going green to be morally clean: An examination of environmental behavior among materialistic consumers. Psychol. Mark. 2018, 35, 845–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kunda, Z. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 1990, 108, 480–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sreen, N.; Purbey, S.; Sadarangani, P. Impact of culture, behavior and gender on green purchase intention. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2018, 41, 177–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fransson, N.; Gärling, T. Environmental concern: Conceptual definitions, measurement methods, and research findings. J. Environ. Psychol. 1999, 19, 369–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, K. Gender differences in Hong Kong adolescent consumers’ green purchasing behavior. J. Consum. Mark. 2009, 26, 87–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Polonsky, M.; Kilbourne, W.; Vocino, A. Relationship between the dominant social paradigm, materialism and environmental behaviours in four Asian economies. Eur. J. Mark. 2014, 48, 522–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thøgersen, J. A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. J. Environ. Psychol. 2004, 24, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Beatty, S.E.; Ferrell, M.E. Impulse buying: Modeling its precursors. J. Retail. 1998, 74, 169–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Muruganantham, G.; Bhakat, R.S. A review of impulse buying behavior. Int. J. Mark. Stud. 2013, 5, 149–160. [Google Scholar]
- Block, L.G.; Morwitz, V.G. Shopping lists as an external memory aid for grocery shopping: Influences on list writing and list fulfillment. J. Consum. Psychol. 1999, 8, 343–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cooper, J.; Stone, J. Cognitive dissonance and the social group. In Applied Social Research. Attitudes, Behavior, and Social Context: The Role of Norms and Group Membership; Terry, D.J., Hogg, M.A., Eds.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers: Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2000; pp. 227–244. [Google Scholar]
- Pandey, A.C.; Jamwal, M. Realizing the impact of cognitive dissonance in predicting consumer behaviour. J. Soc. Sci. 2016, 12, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Yassin, A.; Soares, A.M. Buy now before it expires: A study of expiration date-based pricing. Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2021, 49, 514–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cook, S.; Yurchisin, J. Fast fashion environments: Consumer’s heaven or retailer’s nightmare? Int. J. Retail. Distrib. Manag. 2017, 45, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Madhavaram, S.R.; Laverie, D.A. Exploring impulse purchasing on the internet. In Advances in Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research; Kahn, B.E., Luce, M.F., Eds.; Association for Consumer Research: Valdosta, GA, USA, 2004; Volume 31, pp. 59–66. [Google Scholar]
- Sweeney, J.C.; Hausknecht, D.; Soutar, G.N. Cognitive dissonance after purchase: A multidimensional scale. Psychol. Mark. 2000, 17, 369–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chih, W.H.; Wu, C.H.J.; Li, H.J. The antecedents of consumer online buying impulsiveness on a travel website: Individual internal factor perspectives. J. Travel Tour. Mark. 2012, 29, 430–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diener, E.D.; Emmons, R.A.; Larsen, R.J.; Griffin, S. The satisfaction with life scale. J. Personal. Assess. 1985, 49, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Youn, S.; Faber, R.J. Impulse buying: Its relation to personality traits and cues. Adv. Consum. Res. 2000, 27, 176–185. [Google Scholar]
- Rook, D.W. The ritual dimension of consumer behavior. J. Consum. Res. 1985, 12, 251–264. [Google Scholar]
- Mitchell, V.W.; Papavassiliou, V. Marketing causes and implications of consumer confusion. J. Prod. Brand Manag. 1999, 8, 319–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lake, A.L. Consumer Behavior for Dummies; Wiley Publishing: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Seegebarth, B.; Peyer, M.; Balderjahn, I.; Wiedmann, K.P. The sustainability roots of anticonsumption lifestyles and initial insights regarding their effects on consumers’ well-being. J. Consum. Aff. 2016, 50, 68–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hutter, K.; Hoffmann, S. Carrotmob and anti-consumption: Same motives but different willingness to make sacrifices? J. Macromarketing 2013, 33, 217–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bersoff, D.M. Why good people sometimes do bad things: Motivated reasoning and unethical behavior. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 1999, 25, 239–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mao, W.; Oppewal, H. Did I choose the right university? How post-purchase information affects cognitive dissonance, satisfaction and perceived service quality. Australas. Mark. J. 2010, 18, 28–35. [Google Scholar]
- Ryoo, S.Y.; Chechelnytska, I. What makes materialistic consumers more ethical? Self-benefit vs. other-benefit appeals. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 110, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Verplanken, B.; Roy, D. Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: Testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment. J. Environ. Psychol. 2016, 45, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Databases | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Search String | Web of Science | Science Direct | Emerald | Scopus |
Consumer value conflict | 687 | 52,839 | 16,480 | 360 |
Causes of consumer value conflict | 60 | 36,696 | 11,144 | 24 |
Materialism and green values | 69 | 524 | 570 | 22 |
Conflicting values in green consumption | 48 | 32,178 | 3702 | 21 |
Consumer materialistic values and green values | 17 | 423 | 237 | 8 |
Dissonant cognitions in consumption | 1 | 65 | 34 | 2 |
Consumer conflicting values in green consumption | 15 | 9882 | 2592 | 5 |
Consumer materialistic and green value conflict | 3 | 203 | 130 | 2 |
Causes of consumer materialistic and green value conflict | 0 | 151 | 100 | 0 |
String | Databases | Number of Articles | Article Type Review | Subject Areas |
---|---|---|---|---|
Consumer materialistic values and green values | Web of Science | 17 | Articles (17) | Business (12) |
Psychology Applied (4) | ||||
Environmental Studies (3) | ||||
Environmental Sciences (1) | ||||
Forestry (1) | ||||
Green Sustainable Science (1) | ||||
Technology (1) | ||||
Management (1) | ||||
Medicine General Internal (1) | ||||
Plant Sciences (1) | ||||
Urban Studies (1) | ||||
Consumer materialistic values and green values | Scopus | 8 | Articles (8) | Business, Management and Accounting (5) |
Economics, Econometrics, and Finance (3) | ||||
Social Sciences (3) | ||||
Psychology (2) | ||||
Causes of consumer materialistic and green value conflict | Science Direct | 151 | Research articles (151) | Social Sciences (74) |
Environmental Science (50) | ||||
Economics, Econometrics, and Finance (39) | ||||
Business, Management and Accounting (38) | ||||
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (26) | ||||
Psychology (21) | ||||
Energy (18) | ||||
Arts and Humanities (8) | ||||
Decision Sciences (5) | ||||
Medicine and Dentistry (5) | ||||
Causes of consumer materialistic and green value conflict | Emerald | 100 | Articles (100) | - |
Dissonant cognitions in consumption | Web of Science | 1 | Articles (1) | Business (1) |
Dissonant cognitions in consumption | Scopus | 2 | Articles (2) | Business, Management and Accounting (1) |
Multidisciplinary (1) | ||||
Dissonant cognitions in consumption | Science Direct | 65 | Research articles (65) | Business, Management and Accounting (26) |
Psychology (24) | ||||
Social Sciences (23) | ||||
Neuroscience (12) | ||||
Agricultural and Biological Sciences (11) | ||||
Computer Science (7) | ||||
Arts and Humanities (6) | ||||
Economics, Econometrics, and Finance (6) | ||||
Environmental Science (6) | ||||
Medicine and Dentistry (6) | ||||
Dissonant cognitions in consumption | Emerald | 34 | Articles (34) | - |
Article | Author, Year | Country of Study | Research Object | Research Method | Research Area |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Furchheim, Martin, and Morhart (2020) | Switzerland and Ireland | Value conflict, self-concept clarity, stress, satisfaction with life, preference for consistency | Survey | Psychology; Business and Economics; |
2 | Tang and Hinsch (2018) | USA | Environmental attitude, environmental knowledge, indirect environmental behavior, materialistic values, self-consciousness | Survey, secondary data analysis | Psychology; Business and Economics |
3 | Sreen, Purbey and Sadarangani (2020) | India | Materialism facets, environmental beliefs, subjective norms, attitude towards green products, perceived behavioral control | Survey | Business and Economics |
4 | Séré de Lanauze and Siadou-Martin (2020) | France | Past behavior, affective attitude toward meat consumption, resistance attitude toward global consumption, attitude toward meat production, psychological discomfort, motivation to change behavior, external information, reduction strategies (trivialization and decredibilization). | Survey | Business and Economics |
5 | Yassin and Soares (2020) | Egypt | Impulsive buying, cognitive dissonance, and expiration date-based pricing | Survey | Business and Economics |
6 | Chauhan and Sagar (2021) | - | Consumer confusion | Systematic literature review | Business and Economics |
7 | Telci, Maden and Kantur (2011) | - | Cognitive dissonance | Systematic literature review | Business and Economics |
8 | Alzubaidi, Slade, Dwivedi (2021) | Saudi Arabia | Environmental concern, materialism, innovativeness, social influence, perceived consumer effectiveness, behavioral intentions, indirect and direct pro-environmental behavior | Survey | Business and Economics |
9 | Dhandra (2019) | India | Dispositional mindfulness, green purchase intention, social conscious purchasing, frugal purchasing, materialism, life satisfaction | Survey | Environmental Sciences and Ecology, Business and Economics |
10 | Dowsett, Semmler, Bray, Ankeny and Chur-Hansen (2018) | Australia | Cognitive dissonance, attitude toward meat consumption | Experimental study | Behavioral Sciences |
11 | Ericson, Kjonstad and Barstad (2014) | - | Mindfulness, well-being, values, empathy, compassion, and sustainable behavior | Literature review | Environmental Sciences and Ecology, Business and Economics |
12 | Polonsky, Kilbourne and Vocino (2013) | China, Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Singapore | Dominant Social Paradigm, materialistic values, concern, intentions, indirect and direct behavior | Survey | Business and Economics |
13 | Helm, Serido, Ahn, Ligon and Shim (2019) | USA | Materialistic values, savings behavior, pro-environmental behavior, well-being | Survey | Business and Economics |
14 | Juvan and Dolnicar (2014) | Australia | Sustainable tourism | Interviews | Sociology |
15 | Lu, McComas and Besley (2016) | USA | Message conditions, anger, message evaluations, time spent reading the message, message processing fluency, attitudes toward genetic modification crops, behavioral intentions to consume genetic modification foods | Experimental study | Behavioral Sciences |
16 | Kulshreshtha, Bajpai, Tripathi and Sharma (2019) | India | Cause-related marketing, hedo-utilitarian products, cognitive and affective responses. | Survey | Business and Economics |
17 | Rothgerber (2014) | USA | Cognitive dissonance, dissonance-reducing strategies | Survey | Behavioral Sciences |
18 | Ryoo, Sung and Chechelnytska (2020) | - | Materialism, ad appeals, protective motivation, enhancement motivation attitude toward ads, willingness to purchase products, willingness to support campaigns | Experimental study | Business and Economics |
19 | Thiermann and Sheate (2020) | - | Pro-environmental behavior | Literature review | Business and Economics |
20 | Vaghefi, Qahri-Saremi and Turel (2020) | USA | Social networking site addiction, self-accountability, cognitive dissonance, guilt, perceived self-efficacy, decision to discontinue | Survey | Business and Economics |
21 | Axon (2017) | United Kingdom | Enablers and barriers to sustainable consumption | Focus groups | Environmental Sciences and Ecology; Psychology |
22 | Johnson, Seifert and Lee (2021) | USA | Clothing subscription, cognitive dissonance, attitude toward clothing subscription, clothing subscription purchase intention | Experimental study | Business and Economics |
23 | Lasarov, Mai, Garcia de Frutos, Egea and Hoffmann (2019) | - | Climate change knowledge, perceived seriousness, counter-arguments | Secondary data analysis | Business and Economics |
24 | Huang and Rust (2011) | - | Sustainable consumption | Literature review | Business and Economics |
25 | Chakrabort, Upadhyay and Dwivedi (2020) | India | Loneliness, Social distancing attitude, cognitive dissonance, social networking site intensity | Survey | Business and Economics |
Frequency of Codes | Percentage | |
---|---|---|
Value conflict causes/Dissonant information | 36 | 6.65 |
Value conflict causes/Environmental beliefs | 33 | 6.10 |
Value conflict causes/Environmental concern | 23 | 4.25 |
Value conflict causes/Impulsive buying | 12 | 2.22 |
Value conflict causes/Consumer confusion | 10 | 1.85 |
Value conflict causes/Anti-consumption | 10 | 1.85 |
Value conflict causes/Decision evaluation | 8 | 1.48 |
Causes of Materialistic and Green Value Conflict | Number of Articles | Areas of Articles |
---|---|---|
Environmental concern | 10 | Psychology; Business and Economics; Environmental Sciences and Ecology; Sociology |
Environmental beliefs | 9 | Psychology; Business and Economics; Environmental Sciences and Ecology; |
Dissonant information | 7 | Psychology; Business and Economics; Behavioral Sciences; Sociology |
Anti-consumption | 6 | Psychology; Business and Economics; Behavioral Sciences; |
Decision evaluation | 6 | Business and Economics; Psychology; Behavioral Sciences; |
Consumer confusion | 4 | Business and Economics |
Impulsive buying | 2 | Business and Economics |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Markauskaitė, R.; Rūtelionė, A. Causes of Consumer Materialistic and Green Value Conflict: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095021
Markauskaitė R, Rūtelionė A. Causes of Consumer Materialistic and Green Value Conflict: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability. 2022; 14(9):5021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095021
Chicago/Turabian StyleMarkauskaitė, Rita, and Aušra Rūtelionė. 2022. "Causes of Consumer Materialistic and Green Value Conflict: A Systematic Literature Review" Sustainability 14, no. 9: 5021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095021