Next Article in Journal
Effect Evaluation of Ecological Compensation for Strategic Mineral Resources Exploitation Based on VIKOR-AISM Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Study on Disaster Mechanism of Oil and Gas Pipeline Oblique Crossing Landslide
Previous Article in Journal
Morphology and Genetic Structure Profile of Farmed Snails Cornu aspersum aspersum and Cornu aspersum maximum in Greece
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effect of Land Use and Drainage System Changes on Urban Flood Spatial Distribution in Handan City: A Case Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Seismotectonics of Shallow-Focus Earthquakes in Venezuela with Links to Gravity Anomalies and Geologic Heterogeneity Mapped by a GMT Scripting Language

Laboratory of Image Synthesis and Analysis (LISA), École Polytechnique de Bruxelles (Brussels Faculty of Engineering), Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Building L, Campus de Solbosch, ULB—LISA CP165/57, Avenue Franklin D. Roosevelt 50, 1000 Brussels, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(23), 15966; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315966
Submission received: 4 November 2022 / Revised: 23 November 2022 / Accepted: 26 November 2022 / Published: 30 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geological Hazards and Risk Management)

Abstract

:
This paper presents a cartographic framework based on algorithms of GMT codes for mapping seismically active areas in Venezuela. The data included raster grids from GEBCO, EGM-2008, and vector geological layers from the USGS. The data were iteratively processed in the console of GMT, converted by GDAL, formatted, and mapped for geophysical data visualisation; the QGIS was applied for geological mapping. We analyzed 2000 samples of the earthquake events obtained from the IRIS seismic database with a 25-year time span (1997–2021) in order to map the seismicity. The approach to linking geological, topographic, and geophysical data using GMT scripts aimed to map correlations among the geophysical phenomena, tectonic processes, geological setting, seismicity, and earthquakes. The practical application of the GMT scripts consists in automated mapping for the visualization of geological risks and hazards in the mountainous region of the Venezuelan Andes. The proposed method integrates the approach of GMT scripts with state-of-the-art GIS techniques, which demonstrated its effectiveness as a tool for mapping spatial datasets and rapid data processing in an iterative regime. In this context, using GMT and GIS to find similarities between the regional earthquake distribution and the geological and topographic setting is essential for hazard risk assessment. This study can serve as a basis for predictive seismic analysis in geologically vulnerable regions of Venezuela. In addition to a technical demonstration of GMT algorithms, this study also contributes to geological and geophysical mapping and seismic hazard assessments in South America. We present the full scripts used for mapping in a GitHub repository.
PACS:
91.10.Da; 91.10.-v; 91.10.Jf; 91.10.Op; 91.30.Dk; 93.85.Pq; 91.70.-c
MSC:
86Axx; 86A04; 86A15; 86A30; 86A60; 86-XX; 86-04; 86-08
JEL Classification:
Y91; Q00; Q01; Q2; Q20; Q24; Q3; Q35; Q5; Q50; Q51; Q54; Q55; Q56; C6; C61; C63

1. Introduction

1.1. Background and Motivation

Nowadays, geological hazards are acknowledged as some of the most disastrous and high-risk events in mountainous regions. These involve a series of negative consequences for nature (landslides, tsunami, rock falls, land mass movements) and complex social problems (destruction of houses and infrastructure, injuries and losses of human lives) caused by seismic risks [1,2,3]. Early prediction of seismic risks in geologically vulnerable regions has become more valuable in a large variety of time-critical geospatial applications focused on evaluating geological hazards for the mitigation of earthquake hazards at the regional scale. The integration of geological and geophysical data is an effective approach for risk assessment in mountainous regions, for the prevention of damages and danger, and for serving for early warning, long-term monitoring, management, and mitigation of seismic hazards.
Recently, advances in cartographic development and mapping have resulted in the realization of an important application of spatial data analysis: the prediction and prognosis of seismic activities or imminent earthquake events from events observed in the past [4,5,6]. With enough data on earthquake events, these methods enable an accurate prognosis of seismicity with the aim of mitigating hazard risks [7,8]. Early detection of seismic risks can be solved by evaluating and visualizing different geophysical determinants that affect disaster fatalities at the country level, namely, seismic hazard strength, population density, distribution of locations, demographic and socioeconomic data, ands geological background layers [9,10,11,12]. For instance, a systematic examination of the correlations and links among various geophysical and geological determinants underlying disasters is useful for the prevention of socioeconomic risks in geologically unstable zones [13,14]. In earthquake analysis, the capability of predicting earthquake events, their magnitude, and their focal depth is highly desirable for real-time risk assessment [15,16].
To build effective geological modeling approaches for seismic hazard prediction, real-time mapping applications are beneficial for earthquake prognoses. However, obtaining an automated approach to cartographic dataset processing for seismic prediction is usually difficult, resulting in biases toward a particular GIS software. The approach presented in this study aims to solve this problem by introducing an integrative study oof scripts developed in the Generic Mapping Tools (GMT) scripting toolset [17], in addition to the traditional mapping. This framework, which is different from the conventional state-of-the-art GIS methods, presents a rapid workflow of mapping based on the data processing from the console using command line and codes written in the GMT syntax. Although advanced methods of geophysical mapping of such seismically active regions as South America present a very important task, the scripting of cartography remains a new topic. To the best of our knowledge, the majority of similar studies used the conventional GIS rather than scripts for the visualization of geophysical data [18].
While conventional methods of GIS enable the plotting the maps in a traditional regime, this often requires manual operations and is not suitable for automated mapping. In such a way, it limits the types of cartographic activities that can be used for operative geological analyses and seismic prediction. In addition, data handling is limited by the restricted compatibility of formats accepted in GIS. In contrast, scripts present a rapid and repeatable procedure of automated mapping that can be integrated into real-time risk assessment and hazard analysis. As a response to these needs, GMT presents a more flexible cartographic approach and versatile strategy of spatial data processing, and it is aimed at seismic risk assessment, geological exploration, and management by using multi-source datasets.

1.2. Contemporaneity and Objectives

Integrated mapping using various multi-source data has the objective of visualizing a complex interplay among the geological, topographic, tectonic, and geophysical parameters. Regional effects of these settings cause the Caribbean region and Venezuela to be exposed to a high risk of earthquakes, volcanos, and associated tsunami hazards. For instance, the tectonic structures of the deep basins and erosional troughs affect the submarine geomorphology, which can be interpreted using geophysical and gravimetric measurements. Earthquake-related aftershocks, hazards, and landslides result in damage to the geotechnical infrastructure and bridges [19], demolished buildings, loss of human lives [20], and aseismic slips and creeps [21]. Such consequences affect both nature and the social sectors of Venezuela and require regular monitoring and mapping for risk and vulnerability assessment.
The visualization of the information on these processes is important for seismic prognosis and earthquake modeling. Recent research demonstrated that geological and geophysical mapping creates a basis for natural hazard risk assessment [22,23,24,25,26]. Therefore, the data derived from hazard risk mapping can be used as background information and for the recognition of complex geological actions and processes. Previous cartographic investigations were mostly carried out by using traditional GIS in geological and environmental studies [27,28,29,30]. However, none of them focused on an integrated approach that would combine various cartographic techniques for the geophysical mapping of Venezuela.
Scripting techniques applied to geological mapping have not been adequately presented in the existing literature in comparison with the traditional GIS. At the same time, scripts employed for visualization of complex geophysical and geological phenomena enable automation and increase the precision of the processing of cartographic data. The use of machine-based methods enables one to accurately map and highlight correlations between geological and geophysical phenomena. With this aim, GMT scripts in combination with QGIS and its plugins were applied for the geophysical mapping of Venezuela in order to visualize the regional seismicity in connection with the geological structure and geophysical setting.
The cartographic objective of this study is to demonstrate the functionality of GMT scripts in combination with GIS techniques. The geological aim is to highlight the correlations between the geological setting, topography, geophysical anomalies, and regional seismicity through the analysis of the distribution, magnitude, and depth of earthquakes. To this end, this study applied GMT cartographic scripting techniques and QGIS in order to process high-resolution open-source raster grids and vector data. We used a variety of datasets to build the project with observed geological and geophysical processes and structures. The primary context of this work is the analysis of seismic events by using the visualization of earthquake locations in the region.

2. Study Area

This study focuses on Venezuela, one the of the most seismically active regions of South America. The spatial extent of the study area was 59.5°–74° W, 0°–12.5° N (Figure 1).
Its location in the Andes exposes Venezuela to a high risk of seismic hazards. Geologically, the most important factors that have a significant influence on the seismicity in Venezuela and its surroundings include lithospheric plate subduction and the associated complex geological processes of the oblique collision of the Caribbean arc and a zone of active deformation in the eastern offshore Trinidad area [31]. This is reflected in the formation of the Venezuelan Andes as a N50°E-oriented mountain belt extending from the Colombian border in the SW to the Caribbean Sea in the NE with the associated Boconó and Valera thrust faults [32]. Seismotectonic activities in Venezuela can be characterized by a spatio-temporal composition of the constituent geophysical and geological forces, their evolutional processes, and their complex interactions. Such linkages are related to the actual location and distribution of seismic sources of the earthquakes in the Andean region with regard to the tectonics and overall dynamics of the Earth’s crust in South America.
The high frequency and magnitude of earthquakes in Venezuela are associated with complex geological and geophysical settings; Figure 2. In addition, the tectonic interactions of the lithospheric plates trigger seismic activity and tectonic-related hazards that affect the lives of people and infrastructures [33,34,35]. The Caribbean–South American plate boundary is a very wide tectonically active zone [36,37] with recorded seismicity at various depths. Thus, anomalous series of earthquakes took place on the east coast of Trinidad with a reported depth of the main shock of 53 km [38]. A seismicity deeper than 40 km was reported on the southern end of the Lesser Antilles subduction zone and the active island arc [39].
Venezuela is one of the most countries that is most vulnerable to earthquakes in the Amazon Basin. The geological hazards in this region are exacerbated by social vulnerability due to the anthropogenic exposure, with a frequently injured and affected population living in the high mountainous regions of Andes, which increases the population who is at risk during earthquakes. Furthermore, catastrophic earthquakes produce a chain effect that triggers tsunamis, which amplifies the damage to the environment and human society. For example, it is reported that since the 19th century, tsunamis in the Caribbean Sea have resulted in the loss of several thousands of lives and the exposure of many people to risk and damage from landslides [40].
Venezuela is located in the north of the South American continent, where a collision of the South American and Caribbean tectonic plates causes complex regional geological patterns (Figure 2). The geodynamics of the interacting plates result in the formation of thrust belts and foreland basins in northern Venezuela that are shaped by the interplay of the geological layers. Outcrops of Precambrian (pC), Quaternary (Q), Triassic (T), and Paleozoic–Mesozoic intrusives (PMi) dominate in the central regions of the country, while regional outcrops of Cretaceous (K) and Paleozoic metamorphics (PZm) and Mesozoic–Cenozoic intrusives (MCi) are found in the Falcón Basin (Figure 2).
The northwestern and northeastern regions of Venezuela are prone to earthquakes [41,42] due to the tectonic activity of the lithospheric plates [43,44]. According to the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS) database, the repetitive occurrence of seismic events, such as volcanism and earthquakes, in northwestern Venezuela and Trinidad and Tobago was recorded as a series of events over the last 25 years. The ongoing effects of earthquakes in Venezuela [45,46,47,48,49,50] and coastal regions of Trinidad and Tobago [51,52] have made geophysical mapping an important task for seismic hazard mapping, earthquake prognosis, and risk assessment [53].
The region of the Caribbean Sea is notable for its complex geologic setting (Figure 3), where several tectonic plates experience collision, interaction, and subduction—these are the Caribbean, Cocos, Nazca, and South American plates. This results in a high seismic activity in the region. The influence of tectonic processes is reflected in a variety of topographic forms, geological structures, and geomorphic settings of Venezuela, as discussed earlier [54,55,56,57]. The geodynamic heterogeneity of the upper mantle has resulted in a specific mountain geomorphology with notable features, such as the extent of the Tobago Trough, the Lara–Falcón Basin, and the crustal structure of the Cordillera de Mérida in southwestern Venezuela, which are important segments of the Andean orogeny [58]. The distribution of earthquakes in this region is strongly controlled by the tectonic and geophysical setting, i.e., closeness to the margins of the colliding South American and Caribbean tectonic plates. Other important factors include the mountain geomorphology and topographic variability, which are shaped by the geophysical–geological forces that affect the variations in depth and magnitude of seismic events.
Active tectonic movements cause the formation of orogenic mountain belts and topographies. In addition, regional bathymetry is complicated by the deep-sea trenches and troughs in the margins of the Pacific Ocean and the Caribbean Sea along the subduction path [59,60]. The complexity of the geological history is especially notable in NW Venezuela—in the Falcón Basin—where interactions between the lithospheric plates and subducting Caribbean slab cause associated seismic activity and geological processes, such as an outcrop of igneous intrusive bodies, crustal thinning, decreased Moho depth, gravity anomalies, and rifting [61]. Previous studies [62] identified crustal thinning beneath the Falcón Basin along the western extension of the Oca–Ancón fault system, which was interpreted as a back-arc basin, as well as suture zones between the Proterozoic and Paleozoic provinces (Ouachita–Marathon-related suture) and Paleozoic and Meso-Cenozoic terranes (peri-Caribbean suture), where the seismic velocity changes.

3. Methodology

3.1. Data

Topographic, geophysical, seismic, and geological data were taken from open sources in order to present a multi-disciplinary cartographic analysis of Venezuela. The topographic data were collected from the open-access repository of the General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO) in NetCDF, and they were collected in raster format with grid cells [63]. The GEBCO presents the most comprehensive data on the topography and bathymetry of the Earth with a 15 arc second resolution [64]. GEBCO data are widely used in the geosciences due to their robustness, i.e., their high resolution, precision, and reliability as a cartographic data source [65,66].
Geological data (Figure 2 and Figure 3) were collected from the United States Geological Survey (USGS). The geological maps were processed as .shp vector layers by using the open-source QGIS software due to its compatibility with the ArcGIS data format. The visualization of these maps followed the traditional mapping process of QGIS [67]. In the first stage, vector layers of the geological provinces and outcrops were visualized within a graphical user interface (GUI). In the second stage, the study area was designated by using an overlay of the Digital Chart of the World (DCW), which is a comprehensive 1:1,000,000 scale vector base map uploaded into the QGIS project.
The geoid map was visualized based on data collected from EGM2008 [68]. The free-air gravity maps and vertical gradient were based on open-source datasets available from the public repositories of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and described in [69]. The seismic dataset used to plot maps of earthquakes was obtained from the Incorporated Research Institutions for Seismology (IRIS) database by using the spatial extent of Venezuela and the neighboring areas of Trinidad, Tobago, and the surroundings. This dataset covered the earthquake events in the region of Venezuela for the period from 1997 to 2021 and included earthquakes with magnitudes from 1.9 to 7.3 M L on the Richter scale.

3.2. Methods

Maps showing the topographic, seismic, and geophysical setting of Venezuela (Figure 1 and Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7) were made by using the scripting techniques of GMT [17] by following the existing methodology described by [70,71]. The methodological workflow included five algorithms in GMT codes, which are presented in Appendix A of this article. Prior to data visualization and mapping, the scripts were written using GMT syntax and organized in the Xcode environment. As mentioned in the previous subsection, we processed the high-resolution data by using GMT. Conventionally, the language of GMT was used in several modules for computing and processing raster data in order to plot cartographic elements. The area of interest was first selected and cut from the GEBCO grid by using the following snippet of code: g m t g r d c u t G E B C O _ 2019 . n c R 286 / 300.5 / 0 / 12.5 G v e _ r e l i e f . n c .
After the first step, all other substantial cartographic elements were added into a script by using the following GMT modules: psbasemap, grdimage, psscale, pstext, psclip, and grdcontour. Specifically, these included images that were visualized in selected color palettes, grids, clipped insertions of regions into a global map, coastlines, borders, rivers, bar legends on the maps, scale bars, text annotations, time stamps, etc. The technique of scripting was applied by using existing detailed descriptions [72]. For example, the ‘grdcontour’ module was used to compute, model, and visualize topographic isolines by using quantitative DEM data as follows: ‘ g m t g r d c o n t o u r v e _ r e l i e f 1 . n c R J C 1000 W t h i n n e r , d a r k b r o w n O K > > $ p s ’. The purpose of the geoid visualization (Figure 4) in relation to the geophysical differentiation was to investigate how the gravity values responded to the effects of topographic elevations and bathymetric depressions.
While GEBCO data were gathered in NetCDF format ( G E B C O _ 2019 . n c ), the geoid data first needed to be converted from the .adf format. This was done with the following code of GMT: ‘ g m t g r d c o n v e r t n 00 w 90 / w 001001 . a d f g e o i d _ 02 . g r d ’. The extent and range of the data were examined through the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library (GDAL) and interpreted for the color palette as follows: ‘ g m t m a k e c p t C 33 b l u e _ r e d . c p t T 55 / 25 > c o l o r s . c p t ’. The geoid was modeled by using the following code: ‘ g m t g r d i m a g e g e o i d _ 02 . g r d C c o l o r s . c p t R 286 / 300.5 / 0 / 12.5 J M 6.5 i P X c I + a 15 + n e 0.75 K > $ p s ’. The visualized data are shown in Figure 4.
The gravity grids and the geophysical data (Figure 5 and Figure 6) were also converted from the initial raw IMG format into the GRD format, which is compatible with GMT. The code was executed as follows: ‘ g m t i m g 2 g r d g r a v _ 27.1 . i m g R 286 / 300.5 / 0 / 12.5 G g r a v _ V E . g r d T 1 I 1 E S 0.1 V ’ (for Figure 5). The same procedure was repeated for Figure 6 (vertical gradient of gravity) by following the examples described in existing work [73]. Annotations were added to all of the maps by using the ‘pstext’ module of GMT, as in the following example: ‘ g m t p s t e x t R J N O K F + f 10 p , 0 , b l a c k + j L B + a 0 > > $ p s < < E O F 294.208 . 24 C i u d a d B o l í v a r E O F ’. The data were converted into the ‘ngdc’ format, visualized with the ’psxy’ module, and mapped, as shown in Figure 5.
The earthquakes in Figure 7 (map of seismicity) were plotted by using the ‘psxy’ module of GMT with the following code: ‘ g m t p s x y R J q u a k e s _ V E . n g d c W f a i n t i 4 , 3 , 6 , 6 s 0.05 h 3 S c c C s t e p s . c p t O K > > $ p s ’. Here, ‘i4,3,6,6s0.05’ indicates the numbers of the columns in the table ( q u a k e s _ V E . n g d c ) that were converted from the original CSV from IRIS. The volcanoes were visualized with the following code: ‘ g m t p s x y R J v o l c a n o e s . g m t S t 0.4 c G r e d W t h i n n e s t O K > > $ p s ’. The complex legend showing the magnitude of events was plotted by using the following code: ‘ g m t p s l e g e n d R J D x 1.5 / 3.0 + w 17.8 c + o 2.0 / 0.1 c F + pthin+ithinner+gwhite -O -K << FIN >> $ps H 10 Helvetica Seismicity: earthquakes magnitude (M) from 1.9 to 7.3 N 9 S 0.3c c 0.3c red 0.01c 0.5c M (7.1-7.3) <…> FIN’.
In practice, we fused the data from seismic events to the topographic grid to show the locations of the events on the map with their attributes, which showed magnitudes ranging from 1.9 to 7.3. In our maps, we demonstrated that the density of the earthquake events visibly increased along the lines of the boundaries of lithospheric plates (thick purple line on the map in Figure 7), with a maximal concentration of events in the Andes (Cordillera de Merida) and the region of Trinidad and Tobago.
The full algorithms of the GMT codes are available in the authors’ GitHub repository: https://github.com/paulinelemenkova/Mapping_Venezuela_GMT_Scripts, accessed on 1 November 2022.

4. Results

Figure 1 was plotted by using the GEBCO raster grid, which was selected due to its quality and reliability. A precise topographic map is essential to a fundamental understanding of the geophysics and tectonics of a region. Topographic maps enable the analysis of earthquake locations and the evaluation of the associated effects on ocean and terrestrial geomorphology. Therefore, the analysis of topography is necessary for the mapping of seismicity, risk assessment, and tsunami wave propagation. Here, the topographic and bathymetric elevations of the study area encompassing Venezuela and the islands of Trinidad and Tobago ranged from −4948 to 5536 m according to the GEBCO grid.
Figure 2 and Figure 3 indicate the spatial extent of the geological provinces and outcrops in Venezuela. The map in Figure 2 shows that most of the territory of Venezuela is covered by the Guyana Shield (aquamarine color) in the southeastern parts of the country. The Barinas–Apure sedimentary basin is located in Llanos and the region of the Andean foothills in western Venezuela [74]. The Barinas–Apure basin (yellow color on the map) includes oil fields, which comprise the third most important area of production in Venezuela after the Maracaibo and Eastern Venezuela basins according to the petroleum accumulation. The Falcón sedimentary basin, which produces indigenous Miocene oil from structural and stratigraphic accumulations [75], is colored in slate blue on the map.
The South Caribbean deformed belt (purple color in Figure 2) represents a submarine prism formed between the subducting tectonic plates in the Colombian and Venezuelan basins and the arc terranes along the northern rim of South America [76]. Its southwestern part, the Sinu fold belt, forms an accretionary wedge in the area of subduction of the Caribbean Plate under the South American Plate [77]. Other important geological provinces include the Guyana Basin, which stretches along the passive margin of northeastern South America, and the Maracaibo Basin (green, Figure 2). The Cariaco Basin (beige color in Figure 2) is an East–West-stretching basin [78] situated in the Gulf of Cariaco, which is located on the continental shelf of the Caribbean Sea, off the eastern coast of the surroundings of Barcelona, Figure 1).
The Tobago Trough (chartreuse green color in Figure 2) is a modern marine forearc basin of the Lesser Antilles arc and is located above the sedimentary succession. It is at least 10 km thick and is a probable oceanic basement that was formed by sediments from various stratigraphic sequences—Quaternary, early Pleistocene–late Miocene, Miocene, and late Eocene. In addition, it may also include mid-Cretaceous or older intrusive suites [79]. The distribution of the Quaternary sediments covering most of the northwest of the country (dark pink color in Figure 3) corresponds with previous studies on Plio-Quaternary extension in the Venezuelan Andes. Thus, this shows the extensional structures corresponding to elongated tilted blocks, with the geometry and kinematics of the structures corresponding to the earlier syn-orogenic extension [80].
Figure 4 shows the variations in the geoid heights over the study area. The highest values for the geoid (up to 25 m, bright red colors) are visible in the southwestern region of the map at the border with Colombia. However, the majority of the territory of Venezuela covers the extent from −50 to 8 m, with the highest values being in the mountains, showing a clearly visible correlation with topographic elevations. The undulations of the geoid in the Guyana Highlands correspond to the higher topographic elevations on the shield, with table-like ‘tepuis’ mountains. In general, the marine areas of the Caribbean Sea have lower geoid heights (blue-colored areas in Figure 4), which correspond well with the bathymetric depressions reflected in the geophysical setting of the Earth.
The comparison of the geoid mode in Figure 4 with the topographic and geological maps in Figure 1 and Figure 2 shows the elevated values of the geoid that are notable in the region of the Guyana Shield. The Guyana Shield is a Precambrian geological formation on the NE coast of South America and is an area of special importance in the historical geology of Venezuela due to the high potential for mineral exploration [81]. Aside from the geological features, the environmental importance of this unique region consists in the highest biodiversity in the world, as it includes the numerous endemic species [82] of the tropical forests of Amazonia [83].
Figure 5 shows the variations in the gravity over the study area. The notable minimum of the free-air gravity coincides with distribution of the Guyana Basin, the southeastern part of Venezuela, and Trinidad and Tobago. In particular, this points to the tectonic basement depression formed during the Jurassic rifting, as well as Lake Maracaibo, an important geological region of Venezuela. The northeastern coasts of Lake Maracaibo are occupied by the Bolivar Coastal Field, the largest oil field in South America. With a basin area of 50,000 km2 and oil production of 30 × 109 bbl, it is the second most prolific hydrocarbon basin in the world after the Middle Eastern hydrocarbon basins [84].
Maracaibo Lake has a wide variety of oil reservoir rocks with structural traps in the tectonic units, e.g., normal or inverted faults on the South American plate [85]. The oil formed in the Maracaibo Basin is mostly heavy black oil with asphaltene deposition [86,87]. The gravity in Lake Maracaibo reaches below −200 mGal in correlation with the bathymetric depression (Figure 1) and the geological extent of the Maracaibo Basin (Figure 2). The highest values for gravity reach +200 mGal and correspond well with the topographic elevation of the Cordillera de Mérida, Columbian Andes, Guiana Highlands, and Sierra Parima. The Amazon and Orinoco Flow Basins mostly have gentle fluctuations in gravity, with values in the range between −25 and 30 mGal (Figure 5).
Figure 6 refers to a vertical gradient of normal gravity as an approximation in which a gravity measurement point, which is almost never placed on the reference ellipsoid’s surface, is adjusted according to geophysical corrections [88,89]. The details regarding the distribution of vertical gravity values over Venezuela, Trinidad, and Tobago showed that the lowest values (below −100 mGal) mostly correspond to the extreme amplitude of topographic changes, e.g., the abrupt borders between the mountains/hills and the margins of the bathymetric depression, while the highest values (over 100 mGal) were detected on the tops of the mountains, which corresponded well with the local geomorphology of the region.
The distribution of the earthquakes and the seismicity of Venezuela, Trinidad, and Tobago (Figure 7) depend on the proximity of the area to a border of lithospheric plates with active margins, such as the South American and Caribbean plates, which are depicted in the map with purple thick lines. The second factor includes active geological processes (faults) and the geomorphology. Hence, the Cordillera de Mérida had the majority of the detected earthquakes after the active zone of Trinidad and Tobago. Most of the earthquakes mapped in Venezuela belonged to the ‘shallow’ category, that is, they had a depth between 0 and 70 km. Earthquakes at depths from 74 to 155 km were located offshore of Sucre, Venezuela, and those that were detected in Trinidad and Tobago were predominantly shallow, not exceeding 70 km. The deepest earthquakes in the inspected database were located in northern Columbia (182–200 km).

5. Conclusions

In this paper, we proposed two algorithms for the geophysical mapping of Venezuela, which included GMT-based scripts and traditional plotting by using QGIS, with the aim of analyzing the geohazard risk of Venezuela. Investigations and risk assessments of geohazards require advanced methods of mapping that are based on the programming of algorithms, as demonstrated in this paper. The operative use of correctly and effectively plotted maps, along with tabular data, supports reasonable and substantiated recommendations aimed at the prevention and mitigation of earthquake hazard risks in seismically active regions, such as the South American Andes. The algorithms based on GMT enabled improved performance of the cartographic workflow in comparison with that of the conventional approaches.
We demonstrated the technical advantages of the approaches to programming in cartography, which included scripting, as this is a rapidly developing branch of geo-information. Due to the high degree of automation, scripting is the best technical cartographic solution for seismic mapping, as it enables rapid machine-based processing of data, which is beneficial for prognosis, predictive mapping, risk assessment, and hazard visualization in a real-time regime. Automation enables the rapid processing of large datasets and the effective use of multi-source heterogeneous data. Aside from that, the known advantages of scripting in cartography include machine-based graphics, which result in an aesthetically refined plotting by GMT.
Scripting cartographic methods for GMT were addressed to evaluate the geophysical and geological correspondences in a seismically active region of Venezuela and the Caribbean Sea basin. We used high-resolution geophysical, topographic, and geological datasets, such as GEBCO, EGM-2008 for geoid, gravity grids, and seismic data obtained from IRIS. The results corresponded with and supported those of previous studies on the geological and geophysical methods of gravity measurements, seismic observations, and earthquake monitoring in Venezuela and the surroundings [90,91].
This study presented a machine-based mapping workflow that contributed to the regional studies of the eastern Caribbean and Venezuela. The GMT code snippets have been presented in a GitHub repository as a demonstration of the technical possibilities of this toolset. The results showed optimized and improved cartographic performance and demonstrated the advantages of the automating processing of geophysical datasets. Multi-source geophysical, geologic, seismic, and topographic data were used for a comparative analysis of the geophysical processes. The tectonic evolution of the Caribbean Sea basin largely affected its geological setting, which could be tracked in the relevant geophysical data, indicating a high seismicity and high earthquake risk in the Andes.
Since the eastern Caribbean is a tectonically complex area that includes a subduction zone, island arc, and active volcanoes [92], a regional analysis and visualization of the varied settings were performed. Specifically, high seismicity was detected in the northwestern region of Venezuela and the northeastern region of Trinidad and Tobago, which is consistent with the geological structure associated with the tectonic setting and the related movements of the subduction of the Caribbean Plate. Although continued research is needed in order to improve earthquake monitoring in the region of Venezuela, this study presents a contribution to the seismic study of the Caribbean and South America, as it shows the earthquakes that were detected according to the IRIS database based on a 25-year time span (1997–2021).
A better understanding of the geological and tectonic factors affecting seismicity and regulating the appearance, magnitude, and focal depth of earthquakes is critical for seismically active regions, such as the Caribbean and Venezuela. Practical applications of geological risk assessment in South America include the use of information by public administrations in city management and urban planning for environmental management and the mitigation and management of hazard risk in regions prone to geological hazards, such as Venezuela.
The main contributions that we have made and the contemporaneity of the presented study are highlighted as follows:
  • Region: The region of Venezuela is at high risk of seismicity and earthquakes because it is located in the zone of the collision of the South American and Caribbean tectonic plates and the Andean orogeny. This requires spatial analysis of the regions that are at risk.
  • Geohazard: The risk assessment of geophysical hazards was based on the effective integration and visualization of multi-source data, which provided detailed insights into the environmental and geological settings of Venezuela and supported complex investigations in seismically active regions of South America.
  • Data: Geological disasters are related to high seismicity, exposure to hazards, and vulnerability of people at risk. This requires complex and detailed studies that summarize these factors and visualize regional geophysical settings, as shown in this paper.
  • Methods: The combination of scripting for GMT and GIS is a solid foundation for cartographic data analysis. An efficient method for processing multi-format data ensures hazard mapping and geophysical and geological visualization with the aim of preventing and evaluating seismic hazards.
In this paper, we approached the problem of automated mapping in the geophysical sciences and the estimation of the level of seismicity in the region of Venezuela for risk assessment studies as a contribution from the new perspective of data analysis. The scripting approach was mainly designed for the integration of data and the presented maps for studies of risk assessment, though it is also valuable as a general-purpose mapping technique. The limitations of GMT may be constrained in specific tasks, such as the analysis of remote sensing data or image processing, where general-purpose languages, such as Python and R, perform better.
The methodology that was presented and explained here for plotting maps with codes from a console can be potentially extended to other regions of the world, since the approach to data analysis remains identical. It is possible to reuse the presented codes for other seismically active regions of the world. The only modifications of the method would include the spatial extent of the study area, that is, the cartographic coordinates for plotting the maps and for downloading the data from the IRIS catalogue.
The implementation of the GMT scripts for other regions implies that one only needs to access datasets for a given region and to adjust the codes to this regional extent in order to map the data fairly well. We consider this cartographic scripting approach as a promising extension of our method for similar future work on seismicity and risk assessment. We demonstrated that the performance and visualization that were obtained are effective and that the level of workflow automation is high. The experimental results verify the usefulness of our approach for both of the following research objectives: the evaluation of the cartographic performance of GMT and the mapping of seismicity in the region of Venezuela and the northern Andes.

Author Contributions

Supervision, conceptualization, methodology, software, resources, funding acquisition, and project administration, O.D.; writing—original draft preparation, methodology, software, data curation, visualization, formal analysis, validation, writing—review and editing, and investigation, P.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This project was supported by the Federal Public Planning Service Science Policy or Belgian Science Policy Office, Federal Science Policy—BELSPO (B2/202/P2/SEISMOSTORM).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The GitHub repository contains the GMT scripts used for the mapping in this study: https://github.com/paulinelemenkova/Mapping_Venezuela_GMT_Scripts, accessed on 1 November 2022.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the three anonymous reviewers for their careful reading, critical suggestions, and useful comments that helped improve an earlier version of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

    The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CSVComma-separated values
DCWDigital Chart of the World
EGMEarth Gravitational Models
GEBCOGeneral Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans
GISGeographic Information System
GMTGeneric Mapping Tools
GUIGraphical User Interface
QGISQuantum GIS
IRISIncorporated Research Institutions for Seismology
NetCDFNetwork Common Data Form
NGDCNational Geophysical Data Center
USGSUnited States Geological Survey

Appendix A. GMT Scripts

Appendix A.1. GMT Script for Topographic Mapping

Listing A1: GMT code used to plot Figure 1 (topographic map).
Sustainability 14 15966 i001aSustainability 14 15966 i001b

Appendix A.2. GMT Script for Geoid Mapping

Listing A2: GMT code used to plot Figure 4 (geoid modeling).
Sustainability 14 15966 i002aSustainability 14 15966 i002b

Appendix A.3. GMT Script for Free-Air Gravity Mapping

Listing A3: GMT code used to plot Figure 5 (free-air gravity modeling).
Sustainability 14 15966 i003aSustainability 14 15966 i003b

Appendix A.4. GMT Script for Vertical Gradient of Gravity

Listing A4: GMT code used to plot Figure 5 (free-air gravity modeling).
Sustainability 14 15966 i004aSustainability 14 15966 i004b

Appendix A.5. GMT Script for Seismic Mapping

Listing A5: GMT codes used to plot Figure 7 (seismic mapping).
Sustainability 14 15966 i005aSustainability 14 15966 i005b

References

  1. Laffaille, J.; Ferrer, C.; Laffaille, K. Venezuela: The Construction of Vulnerability and Its Relation to the High Seismic Risk. Dev. Earth Surf. Process. 2009, 13, 99–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Schmitz, M.; Hernández, J.J.; Rocabado, V.; Domínguez, J.; Morales, C.; Valleé, M.; García, K.; Sánchez-Rojas, J.; Singer, A.; Oropeza, J.; et al. The Caracas, Venezuela, Seismic Microzoning Project: Methodology, results, and implementation for seismic risk reduction. Prog. Disaster Sci. 2020, 5, 100060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Weber, J.C.; Saleh, J.; Balkaransingh, S.; Dixon, T.; Ambeh, W.; Leong, T.; Rodriguez, A.; Miller, K. Triangulation-to-GPS and GPS-to-GPS geodesy in Trinidad, West Indies: Neotectonics, seismic risk, and geologic implications. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2011, 28, 200–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Khan, A.; Gupta, S.; Gupta, S.K. Multi-hazard disaster studies: Monitoring, detection, recovery, and management, based on emerging technologies and optimal techniques. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2020, 47, 101642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mesgar, M.A.A.; Jalilvand, P. Vulnerability Analysis of the Urban Environments to Different Seismic Scenarios: Residential Buildings and Associated Population Distribution Modelling through Integrating Dasymetric Mapping Method and GIS. Procedia Eng. 2017, 198, 454–466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nath, S.K. An initial model of seismic microzonation of Sikkim Himalaya through thematic mapping and GIS integration of geological and strong motion features. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2005, 25, 329–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kwag, S.; Choi, E.; Hahm, D.; Eem, S.; Ju, B.S. On improving seismic risk and cost for nuclear energy facility based on multiobjective optimization considering seismic correlation. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 7230–7241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kwag, S.; Choi, E.; Eem, S.; Ha, J.G.; Hahm, D. Toward improvement of sampling-based seismic probabilistic safety assessment method for nuclear facilities using composite distribution and adaptive discretization. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2021, 215, 107809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Liu, H.; Cui, X.; Yuan, D.; Wang, Z.; Jin, J.; Wang, M. Study of Earthquake Disaster Population Risk Based on GIS A Case Study of Wenchuan Earthquake Region. Procedia Environ. Sci. 2011, 11, 1084–1091, 2011 2nd International Conference on Challenges in Environmental Science and Computer Engineering (CESCE 2011). [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zheng, X.; Feng, C.; Ishiwatari, M. Examining the Indirect Death Surveillance System of The Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 12351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Peng, C.; Jiang, P.; Ma, Q.; Su, J.; Cai, Y.; Zheng, Y. Chinese Nationwide Earthquake Early Warning System and Its Performance in the 2022 Lushan M6.1 Earthquake. Remote Sens. 2022, 14, 4269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Adu-Gyamfi, B.; Shaw, R. Risk Awareness and Impediments to Disaster Preparedness of Foreign Residents in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area, Japan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 11469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yousuf, M.; Bukhari, S.K.; Bhat, G.R.; Ali, A. Understanding and managing earthquake hazard visa viz disaster mitigation strategies in Kashmir valley, NW Himalaya. Prog. Disaster Sci. 2020, 5, 100064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Kamata, H.; Seto, S.; Suppasri, A.; Sasaki, H.; Egawa, S.; Imamura, F. A study on hypothermia and associated countermeasures in tsunami disasters: A case study of Miyagi Prefecture during the 2011 great East Japan earthquake. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022, 81, 103253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shao, Z.; Wu, Y.; Ji, L.; Diao, F.; Shi, F.; Li, Y.; Long, F.; Zhang, H.; Wang, W.; Wei, W.; et al. Assessment of strong earthquake risk in the Chinese mainland from 2021 to 2030. Earthq. Res. Adv. 2022, 2, 100177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yaghmaei-Sabegh, S.; Pavel, F.; Shahvar, M.; Qadri, S.T. Empirical frequency content models based on intermediate-depth earthquake ground-motions. Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng. 2022, 155, 107173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wessel, P.; Luis, J.F.; Uieda, L.; Scharroo, R.; Wobbe, F.; Smith, W.H.F.; Tian, D. The Generic Mapping Tools version 6. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2019, 20, 5556–5564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Castillo, A.; López-Almansa, F.; Pujades, L.G. Seismic risk analysis of urban non-engineered buildings: Application to an informal settlement in Mérida, Venezuela. Nat. Hazards 2011, 59, 891–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Salcedo, D.A. Behavior of a landslide prior to inducing a viaduct failure, Caracas–La Guaira highway, Venezuela. Eng. Geol. 2009, 109, 16–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rodríguez, L.; Diederix, H.; Torres, E.; Audemard, F.; Hernández, C.; Singer, A.; Bohórquez, O.; Yepez, S. Identification of the seismogenic source of the 1875 Cucuta earthquake on the basis of a combination of neotectonic, paleoseismologic and historic seismicity studies. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 2018, 82, 274–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pousse Beltran, L.; Pathier, E.; Jouanne, F.; Vassallo, R.; Reinoza, C.; Audemard, F.; Doin, M.P.; Volat, M. Spatial and temporal variations in creep rate along the El Pilar fault at the Caribbean-South American plate boundary (Venezuela), from InSAR. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2016, 121, 8276–8296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Lyu, H.M.; Shen, J.S.; Arulrajah, A. Assessment of Geohazards and Preventative Countermeasures Using AHP Incorporated with GIS in Lanzhou, China. Sustainability 2018, 10, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Karymbalis, E.; Andreou, M.; Batzakis, D.V.; Tsanakas, K.; Karalis, S. Integration of GIS-Based Multicriteria Decision Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process for Flood-Hazard Assessment in the Megalo Rema River Catchment (East Attica, Greece). Sustainability 2021, 13, 10232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lemenkova, P. Handling Dataset with Geophysical and Geological Variables on the Bolivian Andes by the GMT Scripts. Data 2022, 7, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. He, B.; Bai, M.; Shi, H.; Li, X.; Qi, Y.; Li, Y. Risk Assessment of Pipeline Engineering Geological Disaster Based on GIS and WOE-GA-BP Models. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Valkanou, K.; Karymbalis, E.; Papanastassiou, D.; Soldati, M.; Chalkias, C.; Gaki-Papanastassiou, K. Assessment of Neotectonic Landscape Deformation in Evia Island, Greece, Using GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Analysis. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2021, 10, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. González-Longatt, F.; Medina, H.; González, J.S. Spatial interpolation and orographic correction to estimate wind energy resource in Venezuela. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 48, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hackley, P.; Urbani, F.; Karlsen, A.W.; Garrity, C.P. Geologic Shaded Relief Map of Venezuela. U.S. Geological Survey, Open File Report 2005–1038, 2006. Available online: https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1038/index.htm (accessed on 1 November 2022).
  29. Schmitz, M.; Ramírez, K.; Mazuera, F.; Ávila, J.; Yegres, L.; Bezada, M.; Levander, A. Moho depth map of northern Venezuela based on wide-angle seismic studies. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 2021, 107, 103088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sun, C.G.; Chun, S.H.; Ha, T.G.; Chung, C.K.; Kim, D.S. Development and application of a GIS-based tool for earthquake-induced hazard prediction. Comput. Geotech. 2008, 35, 436–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Escalona, A.; Mann, P. Tectonics, basin subsidence mechanisms, and paleogeography of the Caribbean-South American plate boundary zone. Thematic Set on: Tectonics, basinal framework, and petroleum systems of eastern Venezuela, the Leeward Antilles, Trinidad and Tobago, and offshore areas. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2011, 28, 8–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Dhont, D.; Monod, B.; Hervouët, Y.; Backé, G.; Klarica, S.; Choy, J.E. 3D geological modeling of the Trujillo block: Insights for crustal escape models of the Venezuelan Andes. J. Am. Earth Sci. 2012, 39, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Masy, J.; Niu, F.; Levander, A.; Schmitz, M. Mantle flow beneath northwestern Venezuela: Seismic evidence for a deep origin of the Mérida Andes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2011, 305, 396–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Pérez, O.J.; Wesnousky, S.G.; De La Rosa, R.; Márquez, J.; Uzcátegui, R.; Quintero, C.; Liberal, L.; Mora-Páez, H.; Szeliga, W. On the interaction of the North Andes plate with the Caribbean and South American plates in northwestern South America from GPS geodesy and seismic data. Geophys. J. Int. 2018, 214, 1986–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Suárez, G.; Nábělek, J. The 1967 Caracas Earthquake: Fault geometry, direction of rupture propagation and seismotectonic implications. J. Geophys. Res. 1990, 95, 17459–17474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Audemard, F.A. Néotectonique, Sismotectonique et aléa Sismique du nord-ouest du Vénézuela (Système de Failles d’Oca-Ancón). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Montpellier I, Montpellier, France, 1993; 369p. [Google Scholar]
  37. Backé, G.; Dhont, D.; Hervouët, Y. Spatial and temporal relationships between compression, strike-slip and extension in the Central Venezuelan Andes: Clues for Plio-Quaternary tectonic escape. Tectonophysics 2006, 425, 25–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marshall, J.L.; Russo, R.M. Relocated aftershocks of the March 10, 1988 Trinidad earthquake: Normal faulting, slab detachment and extension at upper mantle depths. Tectonophysics 2005, 398, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Reinoza, C.; Jouanne, F.; Audemard, F.A.; Schmitz, M.; Beck, C. Geodetic exploration of strain along the El Pilar Fault in northeastern Venezuela. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2015, 120, 1993–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Harbitz, C.B.; Glimsdal, S.; Bazin, S.; Zamora, N.; Løvholt, F.; Bungum, H.; Smebye, H.; Gauer, P.; Kjekstad, O. Tsunami hazard in the Caribbean: Regional exposure derived from credible worst case scenarios. Cont. Shelf Res. 2012, 38, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Audemard, F.A. Revised seismic history of the El Pilar fault, Northeastern Venezuela, from the Cariaco 1997 earthquake and recent preliminary paleoseismic results. J. Seismol. 2007, 11, 311–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Pérez, O.J.; Sanz, C.; Lagos, G. Microseismicity, tectonics and seismic potential in southern Caribbean and northern Venezuela. J. Seismol. 1997, 1, 15–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Barr, K.G.; Robson, G.R. Seismic Delays in the Eastern Caribbean. Geophys. J. Int. 1963, 7, 342–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Hayes, G.P.; Mcnamara, D.E.; Seidman, L.; Roger, J. Quantifying potential earthquake and tsunami hazard in the Lesser Antilles subduction zone of the Caribbean region. Geophys. J. Int. 2014, 196, 510–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Audemard, F.A. Surface rupture of the Cariaco July 09, 1997 earthquake on the El Pilar fault, northeastern Venezuela. Tectonophysics 2006, 424, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Baumbach, M.; Grosser, H.; Romero Torres, G.; Rojas Gonzales, J.L.; Sobiesiak, M.; Welle, W. Aftershock pattern of the July 9, 1997 Mw=6.9 Cariaco earthquake in Northeastern Venezuela. Tectonophysics 2004, 379, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Colón, S.; Audemard, F.A.; Beck, C.; Avila, J.; Padrón, C.; De Batist, M.; Paolini, M.; Leal, A.F.; Van Welden, A. The 1900 Mw 7.6 earthquake offshore north–central Venezuela: Is La Tortuga or San Sebastián the source fault? Mar. Pet. Geol. 2015, 67, 498–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pousse-Beltran, L.; Vassallo, R.; Audemard, F.; Jouanne, F.; Oropeza, J.; Garambois, S.; Aray, J. Earthquake geology of the last millennium along the Boconó Fault, Venezuela. Tectonophysics 2018, 747–748, 40–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rial, J.A. The Caracas, Venezuela, earthquake of July 1967: A multiple-source event. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1978, 83, 5405–5414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yamazaki, Y.; Audemard, F.; Altez, R.; Hernández, J.; Orihuela, N.; Safina, S.; Schmitz, M.; Tanaka, I.; Kagawa, H. Estimation of the seismic intensity in Caracas during the 1812 earthquake using seismic microzonation methodology. Revista Geográfica Venezolana 2005, 46, 199–216. [Google Scholar]
  51. Deville, E.; Guerlais, S.H. Cyclic activity of mud volcanoes: Evidences from Trinidad (SE Caribbean). Mar. Pet. Geol. 2009, 26, 1681–1691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Latchman, J.L.; Ambeh, W.B.; Lynch, L.L. Attenuation of seismic waves in the Trinidad and Tobago area. Tectonophysics 1996, 253, 111–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bucci, M.G.; Tuttle, M.P. Liquefaction Susceptibility and Hazard Mapping: Insights From Case Histories of Earthquake-Induced Liquefaction. Ref. Modul. Earth Syst. Environ. Sci. 2022, 2, 563–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Diebold, J.B.; Stoffa, P.L.; Buhl, P.; Truchan, M. Venezuela Basin crustal structure. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1981, 86, 7901–7923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Fajardo, A.; Aubourg, C.; Nivière, B.; Regard, V.; Uzcátegui, R. Neotectonic evolution of Northeastern Venezuela. Geomorphological and seismic analysis in the Monagas Fold and Thrust Belt. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 2020, 104, 102867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lemenkova, P. GRASS GIS for topographic and geophysical mapping of the Peru-Chile Trench. Forum Geogr. 2020, 19, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pérez, O.J.; Aggarwal, Y.P. Present-day tectonics of the southeastern Caribbean and northeastern Venezuela. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 1981, 86, 10791–10804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Avila-García, J.; Schmitz, M.; Mortera-Gutierrez, C.; Bandy, W.; Yegres, L.; Zelt, C.; Aray-Castellano, J. Crustal structure and tectonic implications of the southernmost Merida Andes, Venezuela, from wide-angle seismic data analysis. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 2022, 116, 103853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gough, D.I.; Heirtzler, J.R. Magnetic Anomalies and Tectonics of the Cayman Trough. Geophys. J. Int. 1969, 18, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Lemenkova, P. Geomorphology of the Puerto Rico Trench and Cayman Trough in the Context of the Geological Evolution of the Caribbean Sea. Ann. Univ. Mariae-Curie-Sklodowska, Sect. Geogr. Geol. Mineral. Petrogr. 2020, 75, 115–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Bezada, M.J.; Schmitz, M.; Jácome, M.I.; Rodríguez, J.; Audemard, F.; Izarra, C. Crustal structure in the Falcón Basin area, northwestern Venezuela, from seismic and gravimetric evidence. J. Geodyn. 2008, 45, 191–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Mazuera, F.; Schmitz, M.; Escalona, A.; Zelt, C.; Levander, A. Lithospheric structure of northwestern Venezuela from wideangle seismic data: Implications for the understanding of continental margin evolution. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2019, 124, 13124–13149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Group, G.C. GEBCO 2020 Grid, 2020. Available online: https://www.bodc.ac.uk/data/published_data_library/catalogue/10.5285/a29c5465-b138-234d-e053-6c86abc040b9/ (accessed on 1 November 2022).
  64. Schenke, H. General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans (GEBCO). In Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series; Chapter Encyclopedia of Marine Geosciences; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 268–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mcmichael-Phillips, J. The Nippon Foundation-GEBCO Seabed 2030 Project: The Most Ambitious Seafloor Mapping Initiative in History. Mar. Technol. Soc. J. 2021, 55, 25–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Cortina, G.C.Z.; Wigley, R.; Pe’eri, S. The GEBCO and NOAA Chart Adequacy Workshop. In Abstracts of the International Cartographic Conference (ICA); ICA: Bern, Switzerland, 2019; Chapter 1; p. 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. Lemenkova, P. Tanzania Craton, Serengeti Plain and Eastern Rift Valley: Mapping of geospatial data by scripting techniques. Est. J. Earth Sci. 2022, 71, 61–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Pavlis, N.K.; Holmes, S.; Kenyon, S.C.; Factor, J.K. The development and evaluation of the Earth Gravitational Model 2008 (EGM2008). J. Geophys. Res. 2012, 117, B04406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Sandwell, D.T.; Müller, R.D.; Smith, W.H.F.; Garcia, E.; Francis, R. New global marine gravity model from CryoSat-2 and Jason-1 reveals buried tectonic structure. Science 2014, 7346, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lemenkova, P. Console-Based Mapping of Mongolia Using GMT Cartographic Scripting Toolset for Processing TerraClimate Data. Geosciences 2022, 12, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lemenkova, P. Mapping Climate Parameters over the Territory of Botswana Using GMT and Gridded Surface Data from TerraClimate. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2022, 11, 473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Lemenkova, P. Topography of the Aleutian Trench south-east off Bowers Ridge, Bering Sea, in the context of the geological development of North Pacific Ocean. Baltica 2021, 34, 27–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Lemenkova, P. The visualization of geophysical and geomorphologic data from the area of Weddell Sea by the Generic Mapping Tools. Stud. Quat. 2021, 38, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Callejón, A.F.; von der Dick, H.H. Numerical identification of microseeps insurface soil gases of western Venezuela, and its significance for hydrocarbon exploration. In Surface Exploration Case Histories: Applications of Geochemistry, Magnetics, and Remote Sensing; AAPG Studies in Geology 48 and SEG Geophysical References Series; AAPG: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2002; Volume 11, pp. 381–392. [Google Scholar]
  75. De Rodriguez, G. Fundamental Geological Characteristics of the Venezuelan Oil Basins. In Proceedings of the 3rd World Petroleum Congress, The Hague, The Netherlands, 28 May–6 June 1951. [Google Scholar]
  76. Mann, P.; Kroehler, M.; Escalona, A.; Magnani, B.; Christeson, G. Subduction Along the South Caribbean Deformed Belt: Age of Initiation and Backthrust Origin. In American Geophysical Union; Fall Meeting 2007; AGU: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; Chapter Abstract ID. T11D-02; p. 2. [Google Scholar]
  77. Rodríguez, I.; Bulnes, M.; Poblet, J.; Masini, M.; Flinch, J. Structural style and evolution of the offshore portion of the Sinu Fold Belt (South Caribbean Deformed Belt) and adjacent part of the Colombian Basin. Mar. Pet. Geol. 2021, 125, 104862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Schubert, C. Origin of the Cariaco Basin, Southern Caribbean Sea. Mar. Geol. 1982, 47, 345–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Speed, R.; Torrini, R.; Smith, P.L. Tectonic evolution of the Tobago Trough forearc basin. J. Geophys. Res. 1989, 94, 2913–2936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Dhont, D.; Backé, G.; Hervouët, Y. Plio-Quaternary extension in the Venezuelan Andes: Mapping from SAR JERS imagery. Tectonophysics 2005, 399, 293–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gibbs, A.K.; Barron, C.N. Geology of the Guiana Shield; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1993; Volume 22, 246p. [Google Scholar]
  82. Hollowell, T.; Reynolds, R.P. Checklist of the Terrestrial Vertebrates of the Guiana Shield. In Bulletin of the Biological Society of Washington; Biological Society of Washington: Washington, DC, USA, 2005; Chapter 13; pp. 1–106. [Google Scholar]
  83. Hammond, D.S. Tropical Forests of the Guiana Shield; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  84. Escalona, A.; Mann, P. An overview of the petroleum system of Maracaibo Basin. AAPG Bull. 2006, 90, 657–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Bockmeulen, H.; Barker, C.; Dickey, P.A. Geology and geochemistry of crude oils, Bolivar coastal fields, Venezuela. AAPG Bull. 1983, 67, 242–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Escobar, M.; Márquez, G.; Inciarte, S.; Rojas, J.; Esteves, I.; Malandrino, G. The organic geochemistry of oil seeps from the Sierra de Perijá eastern foothills, Lake Maracaibo Basin, Venezuela. Org. Geochem. 2011, 42, 727–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Memon, A.; Borman, C.; Mohammadzadeh, O.; Garcia, M.; Tristancho, D.J.R.; Ratulowski, J. Systematic evaluation of asphaltene formation damage of black oil reservoir fluid from Lake Maracaibo, Venezuela. Fuel 2017, 206, 258–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Li, X.; Götze, H.J. Ellipsoid, geoid, gravity, geodesy, and geophysics. Geophysics 2001, 66, 1660–1668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Yilmaz, M.; Kozlu, B. The Comparison of Gravity Anomalies based on Recent High-Degree Global Models. Afyon Kocatepe Univ. J. Sci. Eng. 2018, 18, 981–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Guenther, F.B. Relations between Pasadena magnitude and vertical ground acceleration from long distance earthquakes, derived by gravity earthtide measurements at Caracas, Venezuela. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 1980, 21, 261–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Schmitz, M.; Avila, J.; Bezada, M.; Vieira, E.; Yáñez, M.; Levander, A.; Zelt, C.A.; Jácome, M.I.; Magnani, M.B. Crustal thickness variations in Venezuela from deep seismic observations. Tectonophysics 2008, 459, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Ambeh, W.B.; Lynch, L.L. Coda Q in the Eastern Caribbean, West Indies. Geophys. J. Int. 1993, 112, 507–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Topographic map of the region of Venezuela. Mapping: GMT. Source: authors.
Figure 1. Topographic map of the region of Venezuela. Mapping: GMT. Source: authors.
Sustainability 14 15966 g001
Figure 2. Geological map of the region of Venezuela. Mapping: QGIS. Source: authors.
Figure 2. Geological map of the region of Venezuela. Mapping: QGIS. Source: authors.
Sustainability 14 15966 g002
Figure 3. Geological provinces in the region of Venezuela. Mapping: QGIS. Source: authors.
Figure 3. Geological provinces in the region of Venezuela. Mapping: QGIS. Source: authors.
Sustainability 14 15966 g003
Figure 4. Geoid model of the region of Venezuela. Mapping: GMT. Source: authors.
Figure 4. Geoid model of the region of Venezuela. Mapping: GMT. Source: authors.
Sustainability 14 15966 g004
Figure 5. Free-air gravity model of the region of Venezuela. Mapping: GMT. Source: authors.
Figure 5. Free-air gravity model of the region of Venezuela. Mapping: GMT. Source: authors.
Sustainability 14 15966 g005
Figure 6. Vertical gradient of gravity in the region of Venezuela. Mapping: GMT. Source: authors.
Figure 6. Vertical gradient of gravity in the region of Venezuela. Mapping: GMT. Source: authors.
Sustainability 14 15966 g006
Figure 7. Seismic map of earthquakes in the region of Venezuela. Mapping: GMT. Source: authors.
Figure 7. Seismic map of earthquakes in the region of Venezuela. Mapping: GMT. Source: authors.
Sustainability 14 15966 g007
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lemenkova, P.; Debeir, O. Seismotectonics of Shallow-Focus Earthquakes in Venezuela with Links to Gravity Anomalies and Geologic Heterogeneity Mapped by a GMT Scripting Language. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15966. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315966

AMA Style

Lemenkova P, Debeir O. Seismotectonics of Shallow-Focus Earthquakes in Venezuela with Links to Gravity Anomalies and Geologic Heterogeneity Mapped by a GMT Scripting Language. Sustainability. 2022; 14(23):15966. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315966

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lemenkova, Polina, and Olivier Debeir. 2022. "Seismotectonics of Shallow-Focus Earthquakes in Venezuela with Links to Gravity Anomalies and Geologic Heterogeneity Mapped by a GMT Scripting Language" Sustainability 14, no. 23: 15966. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142315966

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop