The Effects of Digital Leadership and ESG Management on Organizational Innovation and Sustainability
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
The article makes an interesting contribution to the literature. The hypotheses are interesting and presented in a sound way. The empirical validation seems competent. The conclusions are compelling.
Author Response
Thank you for giving us the opportunity to read and give us a good review of the paper. Nevertheless, the entire sentence was reviewed and corrected meticulously. We will always try to respond to your feedback. Thank you for taking the time and effort to help us improve our thesis.
Reviewer 2 Report
The paper is well structured and HP are well discussed.
I suggest to describe more indept DL and provide some additional information on the construction of the questionnaire in terms of structure and contents.
Author Response
- I suggest to describe more indept DL.
Response: As you suggested . I added the definition of DL and related materials to the body.
- Provide some additional information on the construction of the questionnaire in terms of structure and contents.
Response: Thank you so much for giving me a good comment on the paper. And We added the source of the questionnaire and the composition of the questionnaire to the text.
Again, thank you for giving us the opportunity to strengthen our manuscript with your valuable comments and suggestions. We have worked hard to responsive to your feedback. Thank you for taking the time and energy to help us improve the paper.
Reviewer 3 Report
The authors have selected a trending topic which has a lot of room and potential for further research. The research methodology is sound and baseline theories for hypothesis development have also been used. However, I feel, the that while building a story and developing a hypothesis of the most important variable of this research i.e. Digital Leadership, there was no relevant theory used. I would suggest that leadership theory be linked to the hypotheses 1 and 2 to strengthen the base of the argument.
Secondly the limitation part needs to be elaborated a bit more. Since it is a social sciences research, one of the limitations is the lack of qualitative research conducted in this study so that more detailed insight could be derived on the role of digital leadership in organizational innovation. Please add this.
Lastly the plagiarism is 23%. please bring it to 15%.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Response: Thank you for your time and efforts. In the following sections, you will find our responses to each of your points and suggestions.
-Reviewer 3.
- The authors have selected a trending topic which has a lot of room and potential for further research. The research methodology is sound and baseline theories for hypothesis development have also been used. However, I feel, the that while building a story and developing a hypothesis of the most important variable of this research i.e. Digital Leadership, there was no relevant theory used. I would suggest that leadership theory be linked to the hypotheses 1 and 2 to strengthen the base of the argument.
Response: We thank you for your thoughtful comments and constructive suggestions. We modified and added the hypothesis development based on your helpful comments. We added leadership theories to Hypothesis 1 and Hypothesis 2 on the text. Thank you.
- Secondly the limitation part needs to be elaborated a bit more. Since it is a social sciences research, one of the limitations is the lack of qualitative research conducted in this study so that more detailed insight could be derived on the role of digital leadership in organizational innovation. Please add this.
Response: Thank you for your insightful comments, which help to improve the quality of this manuscript. The research method and limitation part has been expanded in the revised manuscript. Additional methodological limitations, based on your suggestion.
- 3. Lastly the plagiarism is 23%. please bring it to 15%.
Response: We tried to reduce the plagiarism rate. Thank you for your comments.
Again, thank you for giving us the opportunity to strengthen our manuscript with your valuable comments and suggestions. We have worked hard to responsive to your feedback. Thank you for taking the time and energy to help us improve the paper.
