Next Article in Journal
Economic Efficiency of the Implementation of Digital Technologies in Energy Power
Next Article in Special Issue
Methods for Infectious Disease Risk Assessments in Megacities Using the Urban Resilience Theory
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Investigation of the Output Performance of Compressed-Air-Powered Vehicles with a Pneumatic Motor
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatiotemporal Accessibility of COVID-19 Healthcare Facilities in Jakarta, Indonesia
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Spatial Distribution Analysis of Community Radio Stations as Means for Promoting Climate Change Adaptation Measures in Agriculture under COVID-19 Scenario, Southern Province, Zambia

by
Albert Novas Somanje
1,2,*,
Lauraine Mwila Mwansa
1 and
Kafula Chisanga
2
1
Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Lusumpuko House, Choma P.O. Box 630042, Zambia
2
Mochipapa Regional Research Station, Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI), Ministry of Agriculture, Choma P.O. Box 630090, Zambia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(22), 15380; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215380
Submission received: 12 October 2022 / Revised: 9 November 2022 / Accepted: 16 November 2022 / Published: 18 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Application of GIS and Spatial Data Analytics in Studies of COVID-19)

Abstract

:
Community Radio Stations (CRS) play an important role in information dissemination at local and context-specific levels. This study aimed to analyze the point data distribution of the CRS and their role in promoting climate change adaptation measures in agriculture in times of the Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). The study’s methodological approach included the geospatial mapping of point data of CRS in Arc GIS 10.3, surveys and interviews with thirty-nine (39) experts. In addition, the interview data were analyzed using SPSS 28.0 for frequency and descriptive analysis and excel for graphical outputs. The study found 19 operational CRS in 13 districts, and their radii completely cover the Southern Province of Zambia. Out of the time allocated to agricultural programs, an average of 47% is on climate change adaptation measures in local languages. However, the CRS have limited access to experts to provide information and program sponsorship. This study has established that CRS have the potential to disseminate climate change adaptation measures. Sixty-nine percent (69%) of the CRS noticed an increase in the demand for agricultural programs during the COVID-19 era, with the rapid growth of CRS. The study recommends stakeholders’ collaboration to provide appropriate information to enhance the agricultural climate programmes on CRS and address the challenges of limited access to experts and associated costs.

1. Introduction

The promotion of climate change adaptation measures in agriculture is vital in the Southern Province of Zambia because the area is negatively affected by climate change and weather variability [1]. Weather variability has significantly challenged agricultural production and productivity [1,2].
The dissemination of information on climate change adaptation measures is significant for small-scale farmers to adapt and build resilience. The channels for disseminating agricultural information for climate change adaptation are many, and one such approach is the use of radio broadcasts, especially in rural areas [3,4,5,6]. The surge in demand for CRS was also observed in India for broadcasting services on COVID-19, news, and health in a two-way communication approach [4]. Prahmana et al. [5] findings also reveal that CRS plays an essential role in ensuring blended learning models, especially in remote rural areas during the pandemic era. Similarly, in an armyworm pest radio campaign survey, radio listeners were more likely to adopt control practices than non-radio listeners [7]. However, limited studies have mapped the point data of CRS in Zambia and focused on agricultural information on climate change adaptation and sustainable agricultural production during COVID-19 for enhanced social distancing [8], limited government extension services and declining budgetary allocation [8,9,10]. COVID-19 has been found to impact the provision of agricultural extension services [11]. Davis [8] highlights the need to change how agricultural extension services are provided in times of COVID-19 to ensure the safety of both the extension officers and the farmers. Potential solutions strategies are required to minimize the compound risks due to climate change hazards in the COVID-19 scenario [11,12]. Other studies have recognized the importance of radio services in agricultural extension and the adaptation to climate change [13,14,15].
In their review of adaptation processes by farmers in decision making, Robert et al. [16] propose continuous and sequential flexible planning based on the available new information towards anticipated changes to the environment. Thus, the adaptation process to climate change starts with access to information; therefore, CRS play a fundamental role [16,17].
For adaptation to occur, farmers need access to weather information for planning their agricultural season [16,17,18]. Farmers may also have information on appropriate crop varieties depending on the weather and climatic condition at the local level [15,16,17]. Access to smart climate agricultural information such as conservation agriculture (minimum tillage/crop residue retention, crop diversity/association and crop rotation) is also critical for adaptation in Zambia [19,20]. In addition, crop and livestock diversification information is key to climate change adaptation to ensure resilience to climate-related shocks [15,16,17].
Information dissemination of innovative approaches from research and extension must be managed and shared in simple and clear terms for small-scale farmers understanding through different platforms, including CRS, and will require stakeholder engagement and collaboration [18,19]. However, many processes in agricultural extension and food systems have been impacted by COVID-19. The impact of COVID-19 has been through the disruption of the food system due to the pandemic control measures, increasing numbers of confirmed cases and deaths at the global, regional and country levels. According to the World Health Organisation [21], more than 247.5 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and above 5 million deaths occurred globally. In Africa, there were more than 6.2 million confirmed cases of COVID-19 and 150,825 deaths regionally, while in Zambia, there have been 209,760 confirmed cases of COVID-19 with 3611 deaths recorded. Therefore, in a COVID-19 scenario, agricultural extension and dissemination of climate change adaptation measures should be intensified through approaches that have a low-risk to COVID-19 but a broader impact on the public.
This study’s overall objective was to assess CRS’ potential effectiveness in promoting climate change adaptation measures under COVID-19 conditions. The specific objectives were: (i) to map out all the point data of CRS in the Southern Province of Zambia; (ii) to assess how much time is allocated to climate change and sustainable agricultural information dissemination out of the regular programming time; and (iii) to assess challenges in the dissemination of climate change adaptation and sustainable agricultural information on CRS. The authors hypothesize an increase in the use of CRS for agricultural information dissemination because of mass coverage and reduced contact with farmers due to COVID-19 under traditional extension services (farmer visits and meetings).
The study focused on CRS because access by households across the radio stations is the highest at 81.3% compared with 79.8% and 55.7% for public and commercial radio stations, respectively, according to Zambia Information and Communications Technology Authority (ZICTA) [22]. In addition, CRS have been critical for community engagement during the country lockdown [4]. For this study, community radio is defined as a radio station focusing on local coverage. Therefore, this study does not include all radio stations with national coverage and public radio stations.
This study examines all the 19 CRS, their coverage areas and the local languages used by all CRS in Zambia’s Southern Province. Also mentioned are key gaps in enhancing the community radio station’s role in climate change adaptation and sustainable agricultural information dissemination. This research is important for policy intervention in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) [22,23,24]. Specifically, it is by increasing agricultural information dissemination resulting in improving food production and productivity (SDG 2), good health (SDG 3), through good nutrition and reduced personal contact with extension staff and enhancing climate resilience among small-scale farmers (SDG 13).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Conceptual Framework

In order to address the objectives of this study, the authors proposed a modified integrated framework for analyzing pluralistic agricultural extension performance through the effectiveness of information sources [25,26] and perceptions [27,28,29] based on the innovation diffusion theory by Rogers [30]. Innovation diffusion theory is ideal for technology adoption, such as the use of CRS and climate change adaptation measures by farmers. The innovation-decision process, from knowledge (research and extension), persuasion (community radion operations), and decision (performance and farmer’s characteristics) to implementation (impact through adoption), is critical for climate change adaptation by small-scale farmers [30]. In addition, the development of communication theories underscores the use of mass media such as CRS [5]. Understanding the geospatial distribution of point data for community radio infrastructure and coverage is critical for targeted effectiveness in information dissemination. Therefore, information dissemination is the core mandate of agricultural extension services, innovation diffusion, and knowledge acquisition through different platforms such as CRS [31,32] (Figure 1).
Policies, reliable information sources, infrastructure (point data and spatial distribution) and community socio-economic dynamics are the information and communication context that impact the operations of community radio operation’s performance. The community radio operations that comprise stakeholder engagement, the capacity of the radio station, ownership and coverage of radio stations (radius) are also impacted by research and agricultural extension innovations.
Birner et al. [26] and Swanson et al. [32] define effectiveness as meeting the objective or target set to deliver quality agricultural services through a regular interaction with farmers, such as raising awareness, in this context through CRS. This paper focuses on community radio operations and the potential effectiveness in disseminating agricultural information under the COVID-19 scenario (shaded area in Figure 1). The impact context measures the adoption of climate change and sustainable agricultural practices, such as adoption rate, production and productivity. The impact context is influenced and impacted by farmers characteristics, such as age, gender, education, farm size and other social-economic indicators.
CRS are accountable to the farmers and must be available to provide the necessary agricultural information on climate change and sustainable practices. In addition, farmers should be involved in co-creating knowledge through research and extension to encourage ownership and enhance adoption rates.

2.2. Methodological Framework

This study employed a three methodological approach. Steps 1 and 2 addressed objective 1 through Geographical Information System (GIS) functions for mapping and analyzing point data. Step 3 addresses objectives 2 and 3 through statistical evaluation of the questionnaires conducted to the contacts in the examined CRS and validation of the obtained information by feedback from the officers in the Ministry of Agriculture (Figure 2).

2.3. Study Area and Sample Size

This study was conducted in the Southern Province of Zambia. The study area was selected because it is prone to the impacts of climate change, especially the agricultural sector [1]. The province has 13 districts in which all the 19 CRS available were included in the study (Figure 3).
In addition to mapping, the point data of CRS [33,34] and nineteen (19) radio station staff were interviewed, and 20 agricultural officers validated the community radio station information (Table 1).
Purposive sampling was employed for the experts [32,35,36,37,38], while a snowball technique was applied for agricultural officers [36,37,39,40,41]. Purposive sampling was important for gathering CRS information from experts with the knowledge of their operation in line with climate change adaptation. On the other hand, the snowball technique ensured that local experts were captured through a local referral system among the respondents.

2.4. Study Instruments, Data Collection and Analysis

To achieve objective 1, the authors applied GIS mapping of all CRS and their coverage areas to create a heatmap [33,34]. Heatmaps are important in showing the geospatial concentration of Point data for community CRS in the southern province of Zambia. The focus was on CRS because of its unique setting compared with national broadcasting stations. Climate change adaptation measures and sustainable agricultural production are easily adopted when scaled down and contextualized to the local situation. Furthermore, most CRS understand the local context, social and cultural norms, and language, making them ideal for information dissemination of climate adaptation [42,43]. The mapping was applied using the GPS and ArcGIS version 10.3 and geospatial analysis of the point data of the available radio stations [33,34]. This study used the World Geodetic System (WGS84) as its reference coordinate system [44]. Zambia uses geodetic datums, ARC 1950, referenced to Clark 1880 reference ellipsoid, a horizontal datum. This Zambian physical infrastructure is vital for the precision and proliferation of the Global Navigation Satellite System and Global Information System for consistency with the International Terrestrial Reference Frame.
The study used the android GPS test application to collect point data for all the radio stations in Southern Province. The point data were validated using Google Maps [45,46] by ensuring that the point data aligned with the radio station buildings. To address objectives 2 and 3, the authors used survey questionnaires on experts from CRS and validated by experts from the Ministry of Agriculture in Southern Province, Zambia. Data from questionnaires were analyzed using the available Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 to the researchers. The results of this study are presented using maps, heatmaps, descriptive and frequency statistics.

3. Results

3.1. CRS Geospatial Mapping

The results demonstrate that the minimum radius coverage for the community radio station is 70 km (Chikuni radio and Power FM) and a maximum of 350 km (SKY FM), as shown in Figure 4.
The average radius of the CRS in Southern Province is 170.58 km. The Sky FM in Monze district has the highest coverage area among the CRS and has an estimated 3,000,000 listeners, and the Kabulamwanda community radio station has the least number of 2000 listeners (Figure 5). In addition, the average audience for all the operational nineteen (19) CRS in Southern Province is estimated at 648,389.
The majority (78.9%) of the radio stations are privately managed, while faith-based organizations manage 21.1%. Four of the thirteen districts have no community radio station (Gwembe, Pemba, Sinazongwe and Zimba). Choma and Livingstone districts have four community ration stations each, the highest number per district. An analysis of the heatmap for the point data of the CRS demonstrates that they are more on the eastern half of the province than the western side of the Southern Province (Figure 6).

3.2. Allocated Time to Climate Adaptation Measures Programs on CRS

When experts were asked how the demand for agricultural broadcasting services was during the COVID-19 pandemic, they were asked, if it increased, remained the same or decreased based on the average weekly estimated time (%) allocated for agricultural programs out of the normal programming hours? The results demonstrate that, given the COVID-19 period, the demand for broadcasting agricultural-related programs increased in the majority of the CRS (69%), as shown in Figure 7.
The average weekly estimated time (%) allocated for agricultural programs out of the normal programming hours is 16.65%. In comparison, the average estimated time (%) allocated for climate adaptation programs out of the time allocated to agricultural programming is 47.32% (Table 2).
In all the 19 operational CRS surveyed, the common languages used are English and Tonga (39.9%), while the least used languages are Illa, Goba and Bemba (1.8%) (Table 3). The most combination of languages used by 13 CRS is Tonga, Lozi and English, accounting for 68.4%.

3.3. Challenges and Opportunities for CRS in Promoting Climate Adaptation Measures

The major challenge faced by CRS (42.1%) is the limited access to agricultural experts that would continuously feature and disseminate climate-smart agricultural information and techniques. However, the significant opportunity that CRS (36.8%) in Southern Province have is a proximity to farmers at the local level (Figure 8).
The high response (36.8%) from CRS on being closer to farmers as an opportunity is also reflected in the distribution of CRS in 9 out of the 13 districts. In addition, an analysis of the trends in the registered and operating radio stations shows that there has been a steady increase in the number of radio stations, from two (2) to nineteen (19) from 2000 to 2021, respectively (Figure 9). The increase in the number of CRS also shows the effectiveness potential through coverage and diversity in information dissemination in most districts of Southern Province.

4. Discussion

The community radio station mapping results suggest that the entire Southern Province is covered, as evidenced by the buffer radius transmission coverage. This corroborates well with findings from the survey conducted in 2018, which demonstrated that 83.1% of the households that own radio sets have access to the CRS in the country [22]. The point data heatmap has also revealed that CRS are more concentrated on the eastern than the western side of Southern Province. The concentration of CRS on the eastern side of the province could be attributed to population distribution, fairly developed infrastructure and terrain shown in Figure 3.
The demand for agricultural programs from agricultural organizations and companies increased for 69% of the CRS during the COVID-19 period, indicating that there is a prospective effective information dissemination of agricultural information, including climate change adaptation measures in agriculture (SDG 2 and 13). In Southern Province of Zambia, the confirmed COVID-19 cases are 2900 and 116 deaths, as of 3 November 2021 [47]. The vaccination rate for COVID-19 is still low in Africa (0.6%) [48]. In contrast, in Zambia only 538, 310 (2.9% of the population) were fully vaccinated as of 1 November 2021 [21], and CRS will continue to be essential in this COVID-19 scenario [4,5]. This approach is also essential in achieving good health and well-being (SGD 3) for extension experts and farmers in general [49].
Although the demand for agricultural programs on CRS has increased during the COVID-19, there are still challenges. The major challenge identified in this study faced by the CRS is the limited access to specialized experts to be available continuously throughout the year. During the interviews, it was also revealed that experts on climate adaptation measures are only available for a short period of time during the rainy season, where in some cases it is too costly for CRS. Similarly, Abdulai et al. [50] have demonstrated that community engagement is essential for climate change knowledge transfer (SDG 13). Although these challenges exist, there are opportunities that can be maximized to enhance the CRS dissemination of climate adaptation measures. This study identifies that proximity to farmers at the local level not only increases accessibility to climate adaptation information but also entails local ownership, participation, culture, and values that are context-specific for the local adaptation to climate change in a COVID-19 scenario. Similar key drivers are appropriate for the local-led adaptation initiatives suggested by Westoby et al. [42].
This study demonstrated that the geospatial analysis point data of CRS can methodologically contribute to the visual understanding of the potential effectiveness in disseminating climate change adaptation measures. Furthermore, the study has proposed a new conceptual framework for analyzing CRS and has made it known that the engagement of CRS in information dissemination has the potential to contribute to achieving the SDGs.

5. Conclusions

This study has established that community radio stations have a potential effectiveness in disseminating climate change adaptation measures in agriculture (SDG 2 and 13), as demonstrated through the transmission coverage in Southern Province of Zambia. Sixty-nine percent (69%) of the CRS noticed an increase in the demand for agricultural programs during the COVID-19 era. On average, it is also estimated that 47% of agricultural programming is allocated to climate change adaptation. Furthermore, all radio stations broadcast programs in local languages, which is critical for local context adaptation. The increase in CRS from two (2) in 2000 to nineteen (19) in 2021 is also a clear indication of the growth and potential in information dissemination and coverage (SDG9).
The study recommends that the Ministries of Agriculture (extension and research wings), Fisheries and Livestock and Green Economy and Environment should provide appropriate information on climate-smart agriculture to CRS to enhance the climate-smart agricultural radio programmes. Further, close partnerships with agricultural stakeholders and other corporate bodies to sponsor climate-smart agricultural radio programs are required, which is key to SDG 17. It is imperative to promote CRS in Gwembe, Pemba, Sinazongwe and Zimba districts for stakeholders willing to set up radio stations through the provision of radio licenses in these districts by ZICTA. Lastly, studies that include the farmer’s perception of CRS in the COVID-19 scenario through a mixed-methods approach and fully test the proposed theoretical framework can be conducted.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.N.S.; methodology, A.N.S. and K.C.; software, A.N.S.; validation, A.N.S.; formal analysis, A.N.S.; investigation, A.N.S. and L.M.M.; resources acquisition, A.N.S.; data curation, A.N.S., L.M.M. and K.C.; writing—original draft preparation, A.N.S.; writing—review and editing, A.N.S., L.M.M. and K.C.; resource mobilization, A.N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The research of this article was supported by DAAD within the framework of the climapAfrica programme with funds from the Federal Ministry of Education and Research. The publisher is fully responsible for the content.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Ministry of Agriculture approved the research study through the Zambia Agriculture Research Institute (ZARI) (Ethical approval number: 11052021). All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Informed Consent Statement

Authors obtained informed consent from each participant in the survey through a Yes/No before beginning the interview. All participants were informed about the context of the study and the anonymous nature of the survey. Permission was sought from each respondent, and they openly and freely answered the questions asked.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the support from the Ministry of Agriculture staff in all the districts of Southern Province, Lee Hantebe, Nkamga Hantumbu and Lawrence Kabutu for their contribution to this study during the data collection period.

Conflicts of Interest

The article’s authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. The sponsors did not play any role in the study’s design, execution, interpretation, or writing.

References

  1. Jain, S. An Empirical Economic Assessment of Impacts of Climate Change on Agriculture in Zambia; Policy Research Working Paper, No. 4291; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2007; Available online: http://hdl.handle.net/10986/7478 (accessed on 11 October 2022).
  2. Aregheore, E.M. Country Pasture/Forage Resource Profiles, Zambia; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009; Available online: http://docplayer.net/44874777-Country-pasture-forage-resource-profiles-zambia-by-eroarome-martin-aregheore.html (accessed on 20 December 2021).
  3. Khan, N.A.; Shah, A.A.; Tariq, M.A.U.R.; Chowdhury, A.; Khanal, U. Impact of Farmers’ Climate Risk Perception and Socio-Economic Attributes on Their Choice of ICT-Based Agricultural Information Services: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan. Sustainability 2022, 14, 10196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Laskar, K.A.; Bhattacharyya, B. Community radio stations’ production responses to COVID-19 pandemic in India. Media Asia 2021, 48, 243–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Prahmana, R.C.I.; Hartanto, D.; Kusumaningtyas, D.A.; Ali, R.M. Community radio-based blended learning model: A promising learning model in remote area during pandemic era. Heliyon 2021, 7, e07511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Servaes, J.; Malikhao, P. Development communication approaches in an international perspective. Commun. Dev. Soc. Chang. 2008, 2, 158–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Rware, H.; Kansiime, M.K.; Mugambi, I.; Onyango, D.; Tambo, J.A.; Banda, C.M.; Phiri, N.A.; Chipabika, G.; Matimelo, M.; Chaaba, D.K.; et al. Is radio an effective method for delivering actionable information for responding to emerging pest threats? A case study of fall armyworm campaign in Zambia. CABI Agric Biosci. 2021, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Davis, K. Agricultural education and extension in a time of COVID. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2020, 26, 237–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Benin, B.; Yu, S. Complying with the Maputo Declaration Target; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Washington, DC, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. ReSAKSS. Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support Systems. ReSAKSS. 2018. Available online: http://www.resakss.org (accessed on 8 August 2021).
  11. Sampson, S.; Mazur, J.; Israel, G.; Galindo, S.; Ward, C. Competing Roles and Expectations: Preliminary Data from an Agricultural Extension Survey on COVID-19 Impacts. J. Agromedicine 2020, 25, 396–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Joseph, F.A. How Africa Is Promoting Agricultural Innovations and Technologies amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 1345–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Phillips, C.A.; Caldas, A.; Cleetus, R.; Dahl, K.A.; Declet-Barreto, J.; Licker, R.; Merner, L.D.; Ortiz-Partida, J.P.; Phelan, A.L.; Spanger-Siegfried, E.; et al. Compound climate risks in the COVID-19 pandemic. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2020, 10, 586–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Blum, M.L. Investment requirements in extension to achieve zero hunger and adapt to climate change. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. A 2014, 4, 552–562. [Google Scholar]
  15. Drechsel, P.; Zimmermann, U. Factors influencing the intensification of farming systems and soil-nutrient management in the rural-urban continuum of SW Ghana. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 2005, 168, 694–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Robert, M.; Thomas, A.; Bergez, J.-E. Processes of adaptation in farm decision-making models. A review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 2016, 36, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Ageyo, J.; Muchunku, I.G. Beyond the Right of Access: A Critique of the Legalist Approach to Dissemination of Climate Change Information in Kenya. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kapinga, M.D.; Siyao, P.O.; Sife, A.S. Role of Community Broadcast Media in the Dissemination of Climate Change Information among Small-Holder Farmers in Isimani Division, Iringa Rural District. Uongozi J. Manag. Dev. Dyn. 2020, 30, 1–37. [Google Scholar]
  19. Somanje, A.N.; Mohan, G.; Saito, O. Evaluating farmers’ perception toward the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in Ghana and Zambia. Agric. Food Secur. 2021, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Somanje, A.N.; Crespo, O.; Zinyengere, N. Conservation Agriculture Among Farmers in Kalomo, Zambia. In Beyond Agricultural Impacts; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017; pp. 77–99. [Google Scholar]
  21. WHO. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard|WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. 2022. Available online: https://covid19.who.int/ (accessed on 11 April 2022).
  22. ZICTA. 2018 National Survey on Access and Usage of ICTs by Households and Individuals. A Demand Side Assessment of Access and Usage of ICTs in Zambia; Zambia Information and Communications Technology Authority (ZICTA): Lusaka, Zambia, 2018; pp. 1–33. [Google Scholar]
  23. Somanje, A.N.; Mohan, G.; Lopes, J.; Mensah, A.; Gordon, C.; Zhou, X.; Moinuddin, M.; Saito, O.; Takeuchi, K. Challenges and Potential Solutions for Sustainable Urban-Rural Linkages in a Ghanaian Context. Sustainability 2020, 12, 507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wu, J.; Guo, S.; Huang, H.; Liu, W.; Xiang, Y. Information and Communications Technologies for Sustainable Development Goals: State-of-the-Art, Needs and Perspectives. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2018, 20, 2389–2406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Wu, J.; Guo, S.; Li, J.; Zeng, D. Big Data Meet Green Challenges: Big Data Toward Green Applications. IEEE Syst. J. 2016, 10, 888–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Birner, R.; Davis, K.; Pender, J.; Nkonya, E.; Anandajayasekeram, P.; Ekboir, J.; Mbabu, A.; Spielman, D.J.; Horna, D.; Benin, S.; et al. From Best Practice to Best Fit: A Framework for Designing and Analyzing Pluralistic Agricultural Advisory Services Worldwide. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2009, 15, 341–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Ragasa, C.; Ulimwengu, J.; Randriamamonjy, J.; Badibanga, T. Factors Affecting Performance of Agricultural Extension: Evidence from Democratic Republic of Congo. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2016, 22, 113–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Elias, A.; Nohmi, M.; Yasunobu, K.; Ishida, A. Farmers’ satisfaction with agricultural extension service and its influencing factors: A case study in north west Ethiopia. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. 2016, 18, 39–53. [Google Scholar]
  29. Ntshangase, N.L.; Muroyiwa, B.; Sibanda, M. Farmers’ Perceptions and Factors Influencing the Adoption of No-Till Conservation Agriculture by Small-Scale Farmers in Zashuke, KwaZulu-Natal Province. Sustainability 2018, 10, 555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed.; Free Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  31. Adesina, A. Technology characteristics, farmers’ perceptions and adoption decisions: A Tobit model application in Sierra Leone. Agric. Econ. 1993, 9, 297–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Swanson, B.E.; Bentz, R.P.; Sofranko, A.J. Improving Agricultural Extension. A Reference Manual; FAO: Rome, Italy, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bekele, N.; Demissie, B. Analyzing and Modeling of Geo Spatial Effect on Radio Wave Propagation System Using Geospatial Technologies. J. Geogr. Inf. Syst. 2017, 9, 777–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. De Smith, M.; Goodchild, M.; Longley, P. Geospatial Analysis: A Comprehensive Guide to Principles Techniques and Software Tools, 6th ed.; Troubador Publishing Ltd.: Harborough, UK, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  35. Abunga, M.; Emelia, G.; Samuel, D. Adoption of modern agricultural production technologies by farm households in Ghana: What factors influence their decisions? J. Biol. Agric. Healthc. 2012, 2, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  36. Cohen, L.; Manion, L.; Morrison, K. Research Methods in Education, 6th ed.; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  37. Creswell, J.W. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Approaches, 3rd ed.; Sage: London, UK, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  38. Maoba, S. Farmers’ perception of agricultural extension service delivery in germiston region, Gauteng province, South Africa. South African J. Agric. Ext. 2016, 44, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zewdu, G.A.; Malek, M. Implications of Land Policies for Rural-urban Linkages and Rural Transformation in Ethiopia. ESSP II Work. Pap. 2010, 15, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  40. Cox, A.J.; Sseguya, H. ICT supported extension services in conservation agriculture information access for small holder farmers in Laikipia County, Kenya. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS), Dublin, Ireland, 11–12 November 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Owusu, G. The role of district capitals in regional development—Linking small towns, rural-urban linkages and decentralisation in Ghana. Int. Dev. Plan. Rev. 2005, 27, 59–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Westoby, R.; Clissold, R.; McNamara, K.E.; Ahmed, I.; Resurrección, B.P.; Fernando, N.; Huq, S. Locally led adaptation: Drivers for appropriate grassroots initiatives. Local Environ. 2021, 26, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Shahzalal, M.; Hassan, A. Communicating Sustainability: Using Community Media to Influence Rural People’s Intention to Adopt Sustainable Behaviour. Sustainability 2019, 11, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Nepoklonov, V.; Maximova, M.; Sukharev-Krylov, I. Monitoring of spatial data coordinate basis integrity using coordinate transformations. E3S Web Conf. 2021, 310, 03009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Chandra, A.; Jain, S.; Qadeer, M.A. GPS locator: An application for location tracking and sharing using GPS for Java enabled handhelds. In Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks, Gwalior, India, 7–9 October 2011; pp. 406–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Windarni, V.A.; Sediyono, E.; Setiawan, A. Using GPS and Google maps for mapping digital land certificates. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), Mataram, Indonesia, 28–29 October 2016; pp. 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ministry of Health. Zambia (COVID-19) General Dashboard. 2022. Available online: https://rtc-planning.maps.arcgis.com/apps/dashboards/3b3a01c1d8444932ba075fb44b119b63 (accessed on 2 April 2022).
  48. Cihan, P. Forecasting fully vaccinated people against COVID-19 and examining future vaccination rate for herd immunity in the US, Asia, Europe, Africa, South America, and the World. Appl. Soft Comput. 2021, 111, 107708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Yusha’u, M.J.; Servaes, J. Communication for Sustainable Development in the Age of COVID-19. In The Palgrave Handbook of International Communication and Sustainable Development; Palgrave Macmillan: Cham, Switzerland, 2021; pp. 3–30. [Google Scholar]
  50. Abdulai, A.-R.; Chireh, V.K.; Tchoukaleyska, R. Engaging Diverse Audiences: The Role of Community Radio in Rural Climate Change Knowledge Translation. J. Community Engagem. Scholarsh. 2021, 13, 8. Available online: https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/jces/vol13/iss3/8 (accessed on 2 April 2022). [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The conceptual framework for analyzing the potential effectiveness of CRS in disseminating climate change adaptation measures and sustainable agriculture. Modified from Birner et al. [26].
Figure 1. The conceptual framework for analyzing the potential effectiveness of CRS in disseminating climate change adaptation measures and sustainable agriculture. Modified from Birner et al. [26].
Sustainability 14 15380 g001
Figure 2. Methodological framework. Source: Authors.
Figure 2. Methodological framework. Source: Authors.
Sustainability 14 15380 g002
Figure 3. The Southern Province of Zambia. Authors’ illustration. Data sources: DIVA-GIS (https://www.diva-gis.org/).
Figure 3. The Southern Province of Zambia. Authors’ illustration. Data sources: DIVA-GIS (https://www.diva-gis.org/).
Sustainability 14 15380 g003
Figure 4. The mapped point data of CRS and their transmitter radius coverage. Source: Survey.
Figure 4. The mapped point data of CRS and their transmitter radius coverage. Source: Survey.
Sustainability 14 15380 g004
Figure 5. The estimated community radio station listenership (n = 10). Source: Survey.
Figure 5. The estimated community radio station listenership (n = 10). Source: Survey.
Sustainability 14 15380 g005
Figure 6. The heatmap based on point data of CRS in Southern Province of Zambia. Source: Survey.
Figure 6. The heatmap based on point data of CRS in Southern Province of Zambia. Source: Survey.
Sustainability 14 15380 g006
Figure 7. Demand for agricultural programs during the COVID-19 period (n = 19) Source: Survey.
Figure 7. Demand for agricultural programs during the COVID-19 period (n = 19) Source: Survey.
Sustainability 14 15380 g007
Figure 8. The challenges and opportunities for the CRS in disseminating climate adaptation measures. Source: Survey.
Figure 8. The challenges and opportunities for the CRS in disseminating climate adaptation measures. Source: Survey.
Sustainability 14 15380 g008
Figure 9. Cumulative registered radio stations (n = 19). Source: Survey.
Figure 9. Cumulative registered radio stations (n = 19). Source: Survey.
Sustainability 14 15380 g009
Table 1. Experts from community radio stations and the Ministry of Agriculture.
Table 1. Experts from community radio stations and the Ministry of Agriculture.
PositionFrequencyPercentMale Female
Station Manager82171
Programs Manager71852
Marketing Manager3821
Reporter1310
District Agricultural Information Officer123166
Provincial Agricultural Information Officer1310
Senior Agricultural Officer51350
Agricultural Officer1301
Program Officer (Agricultural Research)1310
Total39100.02811
Source: Survey
Table 2. The estimated weekly time allocated to agricultural programs on CRS.
Table 2. The estimated weekly time allocated to agricultural programs on CRS.
Time AllocationNMinimumMaximumMeanStd. Deviation
Estimated time (%) allocated for agricultural programs1916016.6518.830
Estimated time (%) allocated for climate adaptation measures on agricultural19010047.3233.771
Source: Survey
Table 3. The number of languages and combinations used in information dissemination by the CRS.
Table 3. The number of languages and combinations used in information dissemination by the CRS.
LanguagesNumber of CRSPercentPercent of Cases
English1933.9100.0
Tonga1933.9100.0
Lozi1323.268.4
Illa11.85.3
Goba11.85.3
Bemba11.85.3
Nyanja23.610.5
Total 100.0294.7
Combination of LanguagesNumber of CRSPercentValid Percent
Tonga and English315.815.8
Tonga, Lozi and English1368.468.4
Tonga, Lozi Nyanja, Bemba and English15.35.3
Tonga, Goba, Nyanja and English15.35.3
Tonga, IIa and English15.35.3
Total19100.0100.0
Source: Survey
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Somanje, A.N.; Mwansa, L.M.; Chisanga, K. Spatial Distribution Analysis of Community Radio Stations as Means for Promoting Climate Change Adaptation Measures in Agriculture under COVID-19 Scenario, Southern Province, Zambia. Sustainability 2022, 14, 15380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215380

AMA Style

Somanje AN, Mwansa LM, Chisanga K. Spatial Distribution Analysis of Community Radio Stations as Means for Promoting Climate Change Adaptation Measures in Agriculture under COVID-19 Scenario, Southern Province, Zambia. Sustainability. 2022; 14(22):15380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215380

Chicago/Turabian Style

Somanje, Albert Novas, Lauraine Mwila Mwansa, and Kafula Chisanga. 2022. "Spatial Distribution Analysis of Community Radio Stations as Means for Promoting Climate Change Adaptation Measures in Agriculture under COVID-19 Scenario, Southern Province, Zambia" Sustainability 14, no. 22: 15380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215380

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop