Next Article in Journal
Detecting the Turn on of Vehicle Brake Lights to Prevent Collisions in Highway Tunnels
Previous Article in Journal
Sustainable Economic Growth and FDI Inflow: A Comparative Panel Econometric Analysis of Low-Income and Middle-Income Nations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Estimation of Carbon Emissions from Tourism Transport and Analysis of Its Influencing Factors in Dunhuang

1
College of Finance and Trade, Lanzhou Resources & Environment Voc-Tech University, Lanzhou 730000, China
2
College of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 14323; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114323
Submission received: 22 September 2022 / Revised: 25 October 2022 / Accepted: 28 October 2022 / Published: 2 November 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Tourism, Culture, and Heritage)

Abstract

:
Traffic carbon emissions have a non-negligible impact on global climate change. Effective estimation and control of carbon emissions from tourism transport will contribute to the reduction in the amount of global carbon emissions. Based on the panel data of Dunhuang in western China from 2010 to 2019, the process analysis method was used to estimate the carbon emissions from tourism traffic of Dunhuang. By establishing the Kaya identity of tourism traffic carbon emissions, the LMDI decomposition method was used to reveal the contribution of different factors to the change in tourism traffic carbon emissions. The results showed that the impact of tourism traffic carbon emissions was diversified; we found three main factors of promoting carbon emissions, namely the number of tourists, tourism expenditure per capita, and energy consumption per unit of passenger turnover. However, the contribution of tourism activities to GDP, passenger turnover per unit of GDP, and energy structure largely inhibited the increase in carbon emissions.

1. Introduction

The danger of global climate change has been under careful consideration by the international community for the past several decades. The massive burning of fossil fuels, especially the extensive use of internal combustion engine, have increased environmental pollution, and scientists are trying to deal with the problems by a series of remedial measures.
Carbon dioxide is the most important issue regarding global climate change. As carbon emissions continue to increase, the greenhouse effects are being produced in nearly every part of the world [1]. Tourism development is one of the sources of carbon emissions. Tourism growth not only contributes to an economy but also leads to a growth in energy consumption [2]; an increase in tourism activities is accompanied by an increased demand on energy such as catering service, accommodation, and transportation, especially expansion of tourism will lead to an increase in the massive burning of fossil fuels, thus, there is an urgent need to reduce carbon emissions from tourism transport [3,4]. Tourism activities are one of the potential contributors of climate change, accounting for a large portion of global carbon emissions. According to the latest data of the World Tourism Organization (UNWTO), carbon emissions related to tourism activities account for about 5% of the total emissions, and carbon emissions from tourism activities are expected to increase by 130% by 2035 [5,6]. Strongly developing tourism meant that greenhouse gas emissions have also increased correspondingly [7,8]. Therefore, the low-carbon development of tourism is an important subject to be discussed urgently.

2. Literature Review

2.1. Relationship between Carbon Emission and Tourism Activities

The Scholars have studied the relationship between tourism activities and carbon emissions. According to the literature review of related studies in China and abroad, it was found that the existing literature mainly focuses on the characteristics of carbon emissions from the tourism activities. For instance, Gössling estimated that CO2 emissions of the global tourism activities reached 1400 Mt in 2001, which accounted for 5.3% of overall level of emission in that year [9]. In New Zealand, tourism has become the sixth most important sector in terms of energy consumption after metal manufacturing, living consumption, transportation, mining, warehousing and quarrying industry [10]. In Penghu Islands of the Taiwan Straits, China, tourism activities display an annual average energy consumption of 0.74 PJ [11]. For 27 African countries, tourism is positive factors leading to increased carbon emissions according to panel data spanning 2000 through 2020 [12]. Yiidirim et al. [13] studied the effect of visitor numbers on CO2 emissions for Mediterranean countries. Gunter et al. [14] presented a method to assess transportation-related carbon dioxide emissions of tourism in European city. Studies have explored evidence that the carbon emissions are generated as part of going abroad to travel and indicated the need to reduce the carbon footprint of the Austrian tourism sector [15].
China is currently undergoing an acceleration of industrialization and urbanization. For this reason, China has ranked second in the world in terms of energy consumption [16]. Developed countries are calling for higher China’s allocation of carbon emission allowance; in this context, China is facing significant difficulties in saving energy and reducing carbon emissions [17]. In 2020, China received a total of 2.879 billion tourists, resulting in a huge amount of carbon emissions. Thus, there is an urgent need to reduce carbon emissions; carbon dioxide emissions must peak and then achieve carbon neutrality [18]. Based on the tourism satellite account and input-output model, the carbon emissions of tourism coupling system has established for China’s international tourism [19]. Using the tourism’s CO2 emission data of China, tourism’s carbon emissions are growing significantly [20]. A total of 30 provincial administrative regions in China were selected as the basic research units, the influencing factors of tourism transportation carbon emission was explored [21]. Based on the panel data of China, scholars have also quantified the carbon emissions related to the specific aspect of the tourism, such as transportation infrastructure [22], tourism carbon footprint [23], and industrial structure [24].

2.2. Relationship between Carbon Emission and Transportation

While tourism activities have a profound impact on economic growth, it is important to point out that all tourism activities depend on fuel emissions energy [25]. Carbon emissions of the tourism activities have been rising every year and are globally experiencing a continuous upturn [26]; moreover, transportation was a primary source of carbon emissions [27]. Energy consumption of tourism transport accounts for 72.08% of the total tourism-related energy consumption [28]. Carbon emissions reduction has become a topic of great interest to researchers since low-carbon tourism is expected to be the dominant orientation of tourism development. With respect to carbon emissions from tourism transport, there is few research results related to carbon emissions based on spatial scale semantics. The LMDI decomposition method has been commonly used to build the carbon emissions model for regional tourism transport [29,30]. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the coupling coordination of carbon emission and transportation in China.

2.3. Decomposition of Tourism Traffic Carbon Emission Drivers

On the decomposition of tourism traffic carbon emission driving factors, scholars have carried out a lot of research. Chen et al. [31] decomposed the carbon emissions in China during 2000–2019 based on the bottom-up approach, maintaining the mutual-promoted and mutual-coordinated relations among different decoupling strategies in the tourism industry should be an important issue to governmental authorities [32]. Ma et al. [33] measured the carbon emissions of tourism traffic in Beijing by Tapio model and Logarithm Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) approach and discussed the relationship between tourism traffic carbon emissions and the influencing factors. LMDI decomposition method is the most common method used for estimating carbon emissions from tourism transport [34]. It has been reported that LMDI attribution was used to determine the factors affecting greenhouse gas emissions in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China, the results showed that energy consumption was a dominant factor resulting in reduced greenhouse gas emissions [35]. One investigation applied the LMDI decomposition method to study changes in carbon emissions in the electricity sector [36], the LDMI method has the advantages of no residual error and strong applicability [37]. They use the LMDI decomposition method to study carbon emissions, and most of them study carbon emissions as a whole.
This paper aimed to evaluate and analyze the carbon emissions from tourism transport of Dunhuang in western China; apply the Kaya identity to determine carbon emissions of tourism traffic for the new tourist destination; and use the LMDI decomposition method to reveal the contribution of different factors to the change in tourism traffic carbon emissions. The historical and culture city of Dunhuang was taken as examples to fully realize the sustainable development of tourism industry.

3. Overview of the Study Area, Research Methodology, and Data Sources

3.1. An Overview of the Study Area

Dunhuang (92°13′ E–95°30′ E, 39°53′ N–41°35′ N) is located at the intersection of Gansu, Qinghai, and Xinjiang in western China. Rail, road, and civil aviation are the three major transportation options of Dunhuang, which is the most popular tourist attractions in western China and is best known as the hometown of the Flying Apsaras and the birthplace of Dunhuang Art.

3.2. Methodology

The two main methods to estimate carbon emissions include input-output analysis and process analysis [38]. The input-output analysis requires energy consumption statistics or carbon dioxide emissions monitoring data. However, the China Energy Statistical Yearbook does not provide statistics on tourism-related energy consumption [39]. Moreover China does not have carbon dioxide emission monitoring systems for different regions. Process analysis offers an indirect estimation of energy consumption in each aspect of tourism. Herein, we selected process analysis to estimate carbon emissions from passenger transportation.

3.2.1. Carbon Emissions from Passenger Transportation

Carbon emissions from transportation were estimated using the method developed by UNWTO [40]. For the three transportation options, which included rail, road, and civil aviation, the calculation model is shown in Equation (1):
C i = P i × T i
where Ci represents carbon emissions of the i-th transportation option; and Pi is the carbon emissions coefficient of the i-th transportation option (g CO2/pkm). According to Kuo et al. [41], the carbon emissions coefficient (g CO2/pkm) of the three transportation options, rail, road, and civil aviation, was 27, 133, and 137, respectively. Ti is the passenger turnover of the i-th transportation option (pkm).

3.2.2. Carbon Emissions from Tourism Transport

Carbon emissions from tourism transport can be estimated using Equation (2) [42]:
C i = C i × α i
where C i indicates carbon emissions of the i-th transportation option; α i is the percentage of the carbon emissions of the i-th transportation option to those from tourism transport. For rail, road, and civil aviation, α i was 31.6%, 13.8%, and 64.7%, respectively [43].

3.2.3. LMDI Decomposition Method for Decomposing the Factors of Influencing Carbon Emissions

LMDI decomposition method offers the benefit of computational convenience, solid theoretical basis, and extensive application [36]. Yoichi Kaya proposed the Kaya equation based on LMDI decomposition method [44]. The Kaya equation allows the incorporation of the main factors influencing carbon emissions from tourism transport to the LMDI method. These factors include economic development, number of tourists, energy structure, and industrial structure. The Kaya equation form of the expression is shown in Equation (3):
CO 2 = j P × R P × GDP R × T GDP × E T × E j E × CO 2 E j
where P represents the number of passengers; R is the tourism revenue; GDP indicates gross domestic product; T is the passenger turnover; E corresponds to energy consumption from transportation; and Ej is the consumption of the j-th energy.
Carbon emissions in the baseline period (C0) and the period t (Ct) are calculated using Equation (4):
Δ CO 2 = C t C 0 = Δ C P + Δ C l + Δ C r + Δ C G + Δ C q + Δ C s
where ΔCO2 represents the variation in CO2 emissions from transportation since the baseline year to the year t (ten thousand t); ΔCp is the number of tourists; ΔCl is the tourism expenditure per capita; ΔCr indicates the contribution of the tourism activities to GDP; ΔCG represents the passenger turnover per unit of GDP; ΔCq corresponds to the energy consumption per unit of passenger turnover; and ΔCs is the energy structure.
Referring to the LMDI decomposition method adopted by Ang [45], in LMDI additive decomposition, the variables are given by Equations (5)–(10):
Δ C P = j = 1 C j t C j 0 ln C j t ln C j 0 × ln [ P t P 0 ]
Δ C l = j = 1 C j t C j 0 ln C j t ln C j 0 × ln [ l t l 0 ]
Δ C r = j = 1 C j t C j 0 ln C j t ln C j 0 × ln [ r t r 0 ]
Δ C G = j = 1 C j t C j 0 ln C j t ln C j 0 × ln [ G t G 0 ]
Δ C q = j = 1 C j t C j 0 ln C j t ln C j 0 × ln [ q t q 0 ]
Δ C s = j = 1 C j t C j 0 ln C j t ln C j 0 × ln [ s t s 0 ]
where P corresponds to the number of tourists in Dunhuang, l = R/P, r = GDP/R, G = T/GDP, q = E/T, and s = Ej/E, 0 is the baseline period, t is a set period of time. When the results of Equations (5)–(10) were above 0, the corresponding variable has facilitated CO2 emissions. If the results were below 0, the corresponding variable had an inhibitory effect on CO2 emissions [46].

3.3. Data Sources

The study data was obtained from the Dunhuang Statistical Yearbooks (2010–2019) [47]. The panel data on passenger turnover of each transportation option came from the China Transportation Statistical Yearbook (2010–2019) [48] (see Table 1).

4. Results

4.1. Carbon Emissions from Tourism Transport and Dynamic Evolution

Carbon emissions from tourism transport in Dunhuang from 2010 to 2019 were calculated using Equations (1) and (2). Results are shown in Table 2. The annual average growth rate of CO2 emissions was 23.96%. In addition, the average annual growth rate of carbon emissions from rail, road, and air transports were 14.03%, 42.13%, and 17.95%, respectively. The annual average growth rate from tourism transport in Dunhuang was higher than the national average [37]. This occurred because Dunhuang is located in western China and the tourists usually travel long distances to get there. Moreover, western China has become one of the top national tourist destinations. According to the data in Table 1 and Table 2, variations in carbon emissions from tourism transport were similar to those of passenger turnover. In addition, the highest carbon emissions were those related to road travel, followed by air travel, and rail travel. As car ownership rate increases, the number of people choosing self-drive trips also increases, resulting in the continuous growth of carbon emissions from road travel. However, this finding disagreed with the suggestion that carbon emissions from air travel were the greatest [38]. The major reason for this discrepancy is that most tourists arrive in Dunhuang via rail travel and road travel. Therefore, in Dunhuang, carbon emissions attributed to air travel were not significantly high. As shown in Table 2, carbon emissions from air travel were significantly higher than those from rail travel. This indicated that the energy consumption in air travels was substantial. In addition, carbon emissions from air travel accounted for an increasing percentage of total carbon emissions from tourism transport. From 2010 to 2015, the rail passenger turnover was far higher than the passenger turnover of road travel and air travel. However, carbon emissions from rail travel were the smallest. Thus, rail travel is a low-carbon and environmental-friendly transportation option compared with road travel and air travel. Results in Table 2 indicated that per capita carbon emissions were 3.499 kg in Dunhuang in 2010. This level decreased to a minimum of 2.729 kg in 2019. The growth rate of tourists arriving in Dunhuang was generally higher than that of carbon emissions, which explained the decreasing trend of per capita carbon emissions.

4.2. Evolution Mechanism of Carbon Emissions from Tourism Transport

In the present study, CO2 emissions from tourism transport were calculated by considering energy consumption. Tourism transport belongs to the transportation sector, thus, the LMDI decomposition method is also applicable. In the present research, the LMDI decomposition method was used to explore the factors that affect tourism transport carbon emissions. The carbon emissions coefficients (t of carbon/t of standard coal) of coal, petroleum, natural gas, and electricity that were used to estimate tourism transport carbon emissions in Dunhuang displayed values of 0.7329, 0.5574, 0.4226, and 2.2132, respectively [37].
The LMDI decomposition method and ”anel’data from the Dunhuang Statistical Yearbooks (Table 3) were used. Factors influencing tourism transport carbon emissions in Dunhuang were estimated using Equations (4)–(10). Results are presented in Table 4.
In the present research, we determined the degree of influence of different factors on carbon emissions from tourism transport. These factors included: (a) the number of tourists; (b) per capita tourism expenditure; (c) contribution of tourism activities to GDP; (d) passenger turnover per GDP unit; (e) energy consumption per unit of passenger turnover; and (f) energy structure. Our results are shown in Table 5 and Figure 1.
Tourism transport carbon emissions increased from 2010 to 2019, according to the results. It was also shown that number of tourists, energy consumption per unit of passenger turnover, and tourism expenditure per capita positively affected carbon emissions. In contrast, passenger turnover per GDP unit, contribution of the tourism activities to GDP, and energy structure displayed a negative effect on CO2 emissions. As shown in Figure 1, the largest contribution to CO2 emissions from tourism transport corresponded to the number of tourists; the contribution rate of this variable was the highest, reaching a 221.43% in 2019. The descending order of the absolute value of the contribution rate for other variables were: tourism activities to GDP (−114.01%); tourism expenditure per capita (18.79%); energy consumption per unit of passenger turnover (2.27%); passenger turnover per unit of GDP (−1.17%); and energy structure (−0.28%) in 2019. According to our results, we formulated the following conclusions:
(1)
The most important reason for the rising amount of CO2 emissions from tourism transport was the increasing number of tourists. The number of tourists positively affected carbon emissions from tourism transport. Its contribution rate was also much more than that of other factors. The number of tourists arriving in Dunhuang has been growing rapidly in the past ten years. Since 2015, the annual average rate of the number of tourists has approached 25%. These facts have demonstrated that Dunhuang is attracting many tourists;
(2)
The increase in tourism expenditure per capita promoted the growth of carbon emissions from tourism transport, though to a lesser extent. With the improvement of people’s living conditions, tourism has become a popular leisure activity for an increasing number of people;
(3)
Dunhuang is located in western China, a far-off destination for many tourists. Therefore, the carbon emissions from tourism transport are higher in Dunhuang than in other China’s 5A scenic areas;
(4)
The development of tourism has a positive impact on GDP growth. Tourism is a low-polluting and highly profitable industry; our results showed that the constant development of the tourism activities resulted in carbon emissions reduction;
(5)
Passenger turnover per unit of GDP has a negative effect on carbon emissions. When other conditions are maintained constant, the larger the passenger turnover will lead to the lower the amount of carbon emissions. This result can be explained by China’s extensive construction of highways and high-speed railways, which have created favorable travel conditions;
(6)
Energy consumption for passenger transportation was the primary cause of increased carbon emissions from tourism transport. The statistics showed that the contribution rate of the passenger turnover per unit of GDP to carbon emissions from tourism transport had been decreasing over the years. This indicated that technical renewal and transformation can improve energy utilization efficiency, thereby reducing energy consumption and carbon emissions;
(7)
Energy structure had a negative impact on the growth of CO2 emissions. The variation trend indicated that petroleum consumption has been decreasing, while the consumption of clean energies has been increasing. Clean energies such as natural gas, wind-generated electricity, and solar-generated electricity, will further reduce carbon emissions when used in the transportation sector;
(8)
The annual average growth rate of carbon emissions from tourism transport in Dunhuang was higher than in the rest of the region [14,33,37], the reason may be that Dunhuang is located in western China and the tourists usually travel long distances to get there. Moreover, western region of China has become one of the top national tourist destinations. The carbon emission was rising steadily in the areas of western region of China.
In summary, the number of tourists, tourism expenditure per capita, and energy consumption per unit of passenger turnover were the primary driving factors for the growth of carbon emissions from tourism transport in Dunhuang. In contrast, the contribution of the tourism activities to GDP, passenger turnover per unit of GDP, and energy structure were the main factors inhibiting carbon emissions. In other words, the number of tourists exerted the largest impact on carbon emissions from tourism transport. GDP was second in terms of the influencing degree, though it had a negative impact on CO2 emissions from tourism transport. The third place corresponded to energy intensity. According to the statistics, even when energy intensity promoted carbon emissions from tourism transport, its influence declined in the studied decade. Energy structure represented the smallest influence, Herein, energy structure optimization reduced carbon emissions from tourism transport.

5. Conclusions and Discussion

In this study, the process analysis method was used to estimate the tourism traffic carbon emissions in Dunhuang from 2010 to 2019. The research results are the theoretical significance and important practical value for the low-carbon development of the tourism and provide a reference for other regions to control of carbon emissions from tourism transport.
According to the calculation results, the tourism transport carbon emissions have increased for the past 10 years. The air tour industry has been the most carbon emissions before 2016, however, road travel accounted for the largest proportion of carbon emissions after 2017. In addition, with the increase in the Dunhuang Mogao International Airport line, carbon emissions from air travel will increase in Dunhuang. At the same time, we concluded that tourism activities to GDP, passenger turnover per unit of GDP and energy structure were largely inhibited the increase in carbon emissions. That is to say that there is bidirectional causality between national income (GDP) and carbon emissions, energy use and economic growth.

6. The Main Policy Recommendation

According to the calculation and analysis results of carbon emissions from tourism transportation in Dunhuang, the practical policy recommendations for tourists to reduce carbon emissions are put forward as follows:
(1)
Dunhuang, as a world-renowned scenic spot and the nation’s key cultural relic protection site, has grown significantly in the past few years. As the numbers of tourists continue to grow, tourists should be selected with the low-carbon way to travel, such as electric vehicles or high-speed railway;
(2)
There is a need to promote low-carbon tourism and construct low-carbon tourist facilities in tourist destination, meanwhile, tourism management department and related enterprises in Dunhuang should actively participate in the advocacy of low-carbon tourism;
(3)
The relevant administrative department for tourism in Dunhuang should learn from the successful experience of other regions, such as defining appropriate standard and promoting the overall pattern of low-carbon tourism.

7. Research Prospect

The emphasis of this dissertation is Dunhuang’s carbon emissions from tourism transport and its influencing factors. main limitations of This study are as follows. First, the study was restricted to Dunhuang in western China; the direction of the future work is needed to explore other China’s 5A scenic areas in order to examine the differences of the influencing factors on the growths of carbon emissions in different types of tourism destinations. Second, the time span of 10 years is relatively short to investigate the long-term effect of carbon emissions from tourism transport.

Author Contributions

G.Y. proposed the idea and wrote the paper; L.J. revised the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China: [Grant Number 51568544] & by teaching reform research project of Lanzhou Resources & Environment Voc-Tech University in 2022: [Grant Number JG22B03].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s). The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Akbostanci, E.; Tunc, G.I.; Turut-Asik, S. CO2 emissions of Turkish manufacturing industry: A decomposition analysis. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 2273–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Katircioglu, S.T. Revisiting the tourism-led-growth hypothesis for Turkey using the bounds test and Johansen approach for cointegration. Tour. Manag. 2009, 30, 17–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Halicioglu, F. An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in turkey. Energy Policy 2009, 37, 1156–1164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kasmana, A.; Duman, Y.S. CO2 emissions, economic growth, energy consumption, trade and urbanization in new EU member and candidate countries:A panel data analysis. Econ. Model. 2015, 44, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. United Nations World Tourism Organization; United Nations Environment Programme; World Meterological Organization (UNWTO-UNEP-WMO). Climate Change and Tourism: Responding to Global Challenges; UNWTO: Madrid, Spain, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  6. World Tourism Organization and International Transport Forum. Transport-Related CO2 Emissions of the Tourism Sector–Modelling Results; UNWTO: Madrid, Spain, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  7. Ghosh, S. Effects of tourism on carbon dioxide emissions, a panel causality analysis with new data sets. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 24, 3884–3906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Khan, Y.A.; Ahmad, M. Investigating the impact of renewable energy, international trade, tourism, and foreign direct investment on carbon emission in developing as well as developed countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 31246–31255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gössling, S. Global environmental consequences of tourism. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2002, 12, 283–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Becken, S.; Simmons, D.G. Understanding energy consumption patterns of tourist attractions and activities in New Zealand. Tour. Manag. 2002, 23, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Fu, Y.K.; Chen, Y.J. An evaluation model for island tourism competitiveness: Empirical study on Penghu Islands. Int. J. Tour. Res. 2019, 21, 655–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Agyeman, F.O.; Zhiqiang, M.; Li, M.X.; Sampene, A.K.; Dapaah, M.; Kedjanyi, E.A.G.; Buabeng, P.; Li, Y.Y.; Hakro, S.; Heydari, M. Probing the Effect of Governance of Tourism Development, Economic Growth, and Foreign Direct Investment on Carbon Dioxide Emissions in Africa: The African Experience. Energy 2022, 15, 4530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yiidirim, S.; Yildirim, D.C.; Aydin, K.; Erdogan, F. Regime-dependent effect of tourism on carbon emissions in the Mediterranean countries. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 54766–54780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gunter, U.; Wöber, K. Estimating transportation-related CO2 emissions of European city tourism. J. Sustain. Tour. 2021, 30, 145–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Neger, C.; Prettenthaler, F.; Gössling, S.; Damm, A. Carbon intensity of tourism in Austria: Estimates and policy implications. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 2021, 33, 100331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, L.; Gao, J. Exploring the effects of international tourism on China’s economic growth, energy consumption and environmental pollution: Evidence from a regional panel analysis. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 53, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, J.K.; Zhang, Y. Could the ETS reduce tourism-related CO2 emissions and carbon intensity? A quasi-natural experiment. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2020, 25, 1029–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, J.K.; Zhang, Y. Tourism and low-carbon performance: An fsQCA approach. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2021, 26, 626–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Duan, X.F.; Zhang, J.H.; Sun, P. Carbon Emissions of the Tourism Telecoupling System:Theoretical Framework, Model Specification and Synthesis Effects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 5984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Xiong, G.B.; Deng, J.H.; Ding, B.G. Characteristics, decoupling effect, and driving factors of regional tourism’s carbon emissions in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 47082–47093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, X.Y.; Mu, X.Q.; Ming, Q.Z.; Ding, Z.S. Carbon Emission Pattern of China′s Tourism Transportation and Its Influencing Factors. Geogr. Geo-Inf. Sci. 2022, 38, 129–136. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  22. Xiao, F.; Pang, Z.; Yan, D.; Kong, Y.; Yang, F. How does transportation infrastructure affect urban carbon emissions? an empirical study based on 286 cities in China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022; 1–19, online ahead of print. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, T.; Tang, Z. Estimation of tourism carbon footprint and carbon capacity. Int. J. Low-Carbon Technol. 2021, 16, 1040–1046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pan, Y.; Weng, G.; Li, C.; Li, J. Coupling coordination and influencing factors among tourism carbon emission, tourism economic and tourism innovation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ballia, E.; Sigezeb, C.; Manga, M.; Birdir, S.; Birdir, K. The relationship between tourism, CO2 emissions and economic growth: A case of Mediterranean countries. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2019, 24, 219–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sharif, A.; Afshan, S.; Nisha, N. Impact of tourism on CO2 emission: Evidence from Pakistan. Asia Pac. J. Tour. Res. 2017, 22, 408–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rico, A.; Martinez-Blanco, J.; Montlleo, M.; Gustavo, R.; Arias, A.; Jordi, O.S. Carbon footprint of tourism in Barcelona. Tour. Manag. 2019, 70, 491–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Paramati, S.R.; Alam, M.S.; Chen, C.F. The effects of tourism on economic growth and CO2 emissions: A comparison between developed and developing economies. J. Travel Res. 2017, 56, 712–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Peeters, P.; Szimba, E.; Duijnisveld, M. Major environmental impacts of European tourist transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 2007, 15, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Al-Mulali, U.; Fereidouni, H.G.; Mohammed, A.H. The effect of tourism arrival on CO2 emissions from transportation sector. Anatolia 2015, 26, 230–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, L.; Yi, L.; Cai, R.; Yang, H. Spatiotemporal Characteristics of the Correlation among Tourism, CO2 Emissions, and Economic Growth in China. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zha, J.; Dai, J.; Ma, S.; Chen, Y.; Wang, X. How to decouple tourism growth from carbon emissions? A case study of Chengdu, China. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2021, 39, 100849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ma, H.; Liu, J.; Xi, J. Decoupling and decomposition analysis of carbon emissions in Beijing’s tourism traffic. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2022, 24, 5258–5274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yorucu, V. Growth impact of CO2 emissions caused by tourist arrivals in Turkey: An econometric approach. Int. J. Clim. Chang. Strateg. Manag. 2016, 8, 19–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, M.C.; Wang, C.S. Tourism, the environment, and energy policies. Tour. Econ. 2018, 24, 821–838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ang, B.W.; Su, B. Carbon emission intensity in electricity production: A global analysis. Energy Policy 2016, 94, 56–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, X.C.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, W. Decoupling between Economic Development and Carbon Emissions and Its Driving Factors: Evidence from China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 2, 2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Zhang, J.K.; Zhang, Y. Carbon tax, tourism CO2 emissions and economic welfare. Ann. Tour. Res. 2018, 69, 18–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. China Statistics Yearbook 2009; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2009. (In Chinese)
  40. Matzarakis, A.; Rammelberg, J.; Junk, J. Assessment of thermal bioclimate and tourism climate potential for central Europe-the example of Luxembourg. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2011, 114, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kuo, N.; Chen, P. Quantifying energy use, carbon dioxide emission, and other environmental loads from island tourism based on a life cycle assessment approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2009, 17, 1324–1330. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ma, H.Q.; Liu, J.L.; Gong, Z.G. Carbon Emission and Evolution Mechanism of Tourism Transportation in Shanxi Province. Econ. Geogr. 2019, 39, 223–231. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  43. Wei, Y.X.; Sun, G.N.; Ma, L.J.; Gan, C.; Liu, H.L. Estimating the Carbon Emissions and Regional Difference of Tourism Transport in China. J. Shangxi Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2012, 40, 76–84. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  44. Tadhg, O.M. Decomposition of Ireland’s carbon emissions from 1990 to 2010: An extended Kaya equation. Energy Policy 2013, 59, 573–581. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ang, B.W. The LMDI decomposition method to decomposition analysis: A practical guide. Energy Policy 2005, 33, 867–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Wang, H.T. Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index Model and the Carbon Emission Mechanism of Energy Sector in Shanghai. China Popul. Resour. Environ. 2010, 20, 143–147. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  47. Jiuquan Bureau of Statistics. Jiuquan Statistical Yearbook 2010–2019; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2020. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  48. Ministry of Transport of the People’s Republic of China. China Transportation Statistical Yearbook 2010–2019; China Statistics Press: Beijing, China, 2020. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Contribution of different factors to carbon emissions from tourism transport.
Figure 1. Contribution of different factors to carbon emissions from tourism transport.
Sustainability 14 14323 g001
Table 1. Tourist turnover in Dunhuang/10 thousand people.km.
Table 1. Tourist turnover in Dunhuang/10 thousand people.km.
YearTourist TurnoverTotal
Railway TravelRoad TravelAir Travel
2010108,36040,32040,840189,520
2011149,28459,85049,760258,894
2012220,50096,79063,000380,290
2013283,500140,91069,740494,150
2014330,024199,14065,140594,304
2015401,976295,20078,420775,596
2016395,460422,32099,300917,080
2017347,880558,280105,3601,011,520
2018321,084733,960151,5401,206,584
2019351,696954,050180,4001,486,146
Table 2. Carbon emissions from tourism transport in Dunhuang from 2010 to 2019.
Table 2. Carbon emissions from tourism transport in Dunhuang from 2010 to 2019.
YearCarbon Emissions from Tourism Transport/MtTotal/MtCarbon Emissions per Capita/(kg/per Tourist)
RailRoad TravelAir Travel
20100.001020.000820.004010.005853.4988
20110.001160.001000.004030.006203.2433
20120.001530.001450.004550.007542.9618
20130.001770.001900.004530.008202.7150
20140.001960.002550.004030.008542.4164
20150.001900.002990.003840.008732.3602
20160.001630.003750.004260.009652.4862
20170.000190.006730.006130.013053.1069
20180.001150.005660.005640.012452.7516
20190.001110.006490.005930.013542.7295
Table 3. Factors influencing tourism transport carbon emissions in Dunhuang from 2010 to 2019.
Table 3. Factors influencing tourism transport carbon emissions in Dunhuang from 2010 to 2019.
YearCO2/Ten Thousand TonsP/Ten Thousand PassengersR/100 Million YuanGDP/100 Million YuanT/Ten Thousand Passengers·kmE/Ten Thousand Tons
20104.10151.0414.0549.97209,9204.03
20114.56180.0018.0063.60236,5945.13
20124.90299.5027.8775.30310,1906.08
20135.32410.0338.3087.80362,1507.13
20145.62506.7348.05100.70414,3047.99
20155.97669.3962.76102.17428,5968.43
20166.08801.5278.36106.40444,0808.79
20176.11639.9591.33110.93458,4288.85
20186.431077.3115.00120.78506,5849.75
20196.911337.33149.69132.72551,14610.82
Table 4. Decomposition of factors influencing carbon emissions of tourism transport in Dunhuang from 2010 to 2019.
Table 4. Decomposition of factors influencing carbon emissions of tourism transport in Dunhuang from 2010 to 2019.
YearΔCpΔClΔCrΔCGΔCqΔCsΔCO2
20100.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.00
20110.340.14−0.01−0.240.24−0.010.46
20121.460.00−0.59−0.040.04−0.080.80
20132.340.01−1.03−0.040.06−0.121.22
20142.990.05−1.31−0.050.01−0.171.52
20153.800.02−1.990.000.06−0.011.87
20164.270.13−2.47−0.020.08−0.021.98
20173.711.10−2.76−0.040.01−0.012.01
20185.290.37−3.280.000.01−0.052.33
20196.230.53−3.97−0.030.06−0.012.81
Table 5. Contribution rate of factors influencing tourism transport carbon emissions in Dunhuang from 2011 to 2019/%.
Table 5. Contribution rate of factors influencing tourism transport carbon emissions in Dunhuang from 2011 to 2019/%.
YearCpClCrCGCqCs
201174.6630.79−2.79−51.7551.73−2.64
2012183.770.10−73.79−5.265.58−10.40
2013191.960.80−84.42−3.524.85−9.67
2014196.683.12−85.94−3.390.74−11.21
2015203.311.08−106.72−0.193.31−0.79
2016215.866.43−124.54−0.843.95−0.86
2017184.8954.81−137.58−2.100.71−0.73
2018227.3015.92−141.12−0.180.29−2.21
2019221.4318.79−141.04−1.172.27−0.28
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yang, G.; Jia, L. Estimation of Carbon Emissions from Tourism Transport and Analysis of Its Influencing Factors in Dunhuang. Sustainability 2022, 14, 14323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114323

AMA Style

Yang G, Jia L. Estimation of Carbon Emissions from Tourism Transport and Analysis of Its Influencing Factors in Dunhuang. Sustainability. 2022; 14(21):14323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114323

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yang, Gengxia, and Liang Jia. 2022. "Estimation of Carbon Emissions from Tourism Transport and Analysis of Its Influencing Factors in Dunhuang" Sustainability 14, no. 21: 14323. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114323

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop