Development and Assessment of Augmented Reality Technology for Using in an Equipment Maintenance and Diagnostic System
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Augmented Reality (AR) in Industry
2.2. Augmented Reality (AR) in Education
2.3. OPC UA Communication Protocol Architecture and Its Principle
3. AR-Based Remotely Collaborative Equipment Network Architecture
3.1. Proposed AR-Based User Interface
3.2. Augmented Reality Wearable Hardware
3.2.1. Specifications of Wearable Hardware
3.2.2. Wearable Device System Description
3.3. AR-Based Remote Collaboration System Architecture
4. AR-Introduced Equipment Maintenance and Diagnostic System
4.1. Introduction Examples
4.2. System Integration Test
4.2.1. Expert Evaluations
4.2.2. Student Evaluations
4.3. System Architecture Application and Description
- (1)
- The virtual equipment can mimic the actual equipment. The virtual equipment anticipating the movement of the actual equipment could support safety in a collaborative environment, as the predictive movement of the equipment could be seen in advance so as to prevent possible risks.
- (2)
- The live command dialogue indicates the current line of code executed by the controller. This can allow users to identify different moments on the production and connect them, which could be useful for debugging or introduced changes introduced in the code.
- (3)
- The joint information spline tooltip displays the position and state of the joint.
- (4)
- The equipment targets are visualized with the use of frames, which also indicate orientation.
- (5)
- The equipment targets can be visualized to understand the use of frames and to predict the equipment’s subsequent movements.
4.4. Analysis and Discussion
5. Conclusions
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Limitations
5.3. Recommendations
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chen, T.C.; Wang, Y.C.; Chiu, M.C. Assessing the Robustness of a Factory Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Fuzzy Collaborative Intelligence Approach. Healthcare 2020, 8, 481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shea, R.; Fu, D.; Sun, A.; Cai, C.; Ma, X.; Fan, X.; Gong, W.; Liu, J. Location-Based Augmented Reality with Pervasive Smartphone Sensors: Inside and Beyond Pokemon Go! IEEE Access 2017, 5, 9619–9631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lehnhoff, S.; Rohjans, S.; Uslar, M.; Mahnke, W. OPC Unified Architecture: A Service-oriented Architecture for Smart Grids. In Proceedings of the 2012 First International Workshop on Software Engineering Challenges for the Smart Grid (SE-SmartGrids), Zurich, Switzerland, 3 June 2012; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Chau, M.; Sung, W.K.; Lai, S.; Wang, M.; Wong, A.; Chan, K.W.Y.; Li, T.M.H. Evaluating Students’ Perception of a Three-Dimensional Virtual World Learning Environment. Knowl. Manag. E-Learn. 2013, 5, 323–333. [Google Scholar]
- Safaei, A.M.; Shafieiyoun, S. Enhancing Learning within the 3D virtual learning environment. J. Knowl. Manag. Econ. Inf. Technol. 2013, 3, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Frolov, E.; Krainev, D.; Tikhonova, Z. Cyber-Physical Machining Systems Based on Commercial CNC Equipment. In Proceedings of the International Russian Automation Conference, Sochi, Russia, 9–16 September 2018; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Milgram, P.; Kishino, F. A taxonomy of mixed reality visual displays. IEICE Trans. Inf. Syst. 1994, 77, 1321–1329. [Google Scholar]
- Costa, G.M.; Petry, M.R.; Moreira, A.P. Augmented Reality for Human-Robot Collaboration and Cooperation in Industrial Applications: A Systematic Literature Review. Sensors 2022, 22, 2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haskamp, H.; Orth, F.; Wermann, J.; Colombo, A.W. Implementing an OPC UA interface for legacy PLC-based automation systems using the Azure cloud: An ICPS-architecture with a retrofitted RFID system. In Proceedings of the IEEE Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems (ICPS), St. Petersburg, Russia, 15–18 May 2018; pp. 115–121. [Google Scholar]
- Kim, Y.S.; Lee, J.O.; Park, C.W. A hybrid learning system proposal for PLC wiring training using AR. In Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Conference on E-Learning in Industrial Electronics (ICELIE), Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 7–10 November 2011; pp. 90–94. [Google Scholar]
- Tonin, L.; Millan, J.D.R. Noninvasive Brain-Machine Interfaces for Robotic Devices. In Annual Review of Control, Robotics, and Autonomous Systems; Leonard, N., Ed.; Annual Reviews: Palo Alto, CA, USA, 2021; Volume 4, pp. 191–214. [Google Scholar]
- Tang, G.; Shi, Q.; Zhang, Z.; He, T.; Sun, Z.; Lee, C. Hybridized wearable patch as a multi-parameter and multi-functional human-machine interface. Nano Energy 2021, 81, 105582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García, A.; Solanes, J.E.; Muñoz, A.; Gracia, L.; Tornero, J. Augmented Reality-Based Interface for Bimanual Robot Teleoperation. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chu, Y.B.; Chang, C.W. A Mobile Augmented Reality Interface on Additive Manufacturing. In Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Science; Zakaria, Z., Emamian, S.S., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- Danielsson, O.; Holm, M.; Syberfeldt, A. Augmented reality smart glasses in industrial assembly: Current status and future challenges. J. Ind. Inf. Integr. 2020, 20, 100175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambrecht, J.; Krüger, J. Spatial programming for industrial robots: Efficient, effective and user-optimised through natural communication and augmented reality. Adv. Mater. Res. 2014, 1018, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lambrecht, J.; Kästner, L.; Guhl, J.; Krüger, J. Towards commissioning, resilience and added value of Augmented Reality in robotics: Overcoming technical obstacles to industrial applicability. Robot. Comput. Integr. Manuf. 2021, 71, 102178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Makris, S.; Karagiannis, P.; Koukas, S.; Matthaiakis, A.S. Augmented reality system for operator support in human-robot collaborative assembly. CIRP Ann. 2016, 65, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karlsson, I.; Bernedixen, J.; Ng, A.H.C.; Pehrsson, L. Combining augmented reality and simulation-based optimization for decision support in manufacturing. In Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 3–6 December 2017; pp. 3988–3999. [Google Scholar]
- Goel, P.; Mahadevan, K.; Punjani, K.K. Augmented and virtual reality in apparel industry: A bibliometric review and future research agenda. Foresight 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lorenzo, G.; Gilabert Cerdá, A.; Lorenzo-Lledó, A.; Lledó, A. The application of augmented reality in the learning of autistic students: A systematic and thematic review in 1996–2020. J. Enabling Technol. 2022, 16, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, Y.; Lee, M.H.; Yang, C.S.; Wu, P.Y. Hands-on interaction in the augmented reality (AR) chemistry laboratories enhances the learning effects of low-achieving students: A pilot study. Interact. Technol. Smart Educ. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, M.; Liu, L. Students’ perceptions of augmented reality integrated into a mobile learning environment. Libr. Hi Tech 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oliveira, R.; Farinha, T.; Raposo, H.; Pires, N. Augmented Reality and the Future of Maintenance. In Proceedings of Maintenance Performance Measurement and Management Conference, Coimbra Portugal, Portugal, 4–5 September 2014; pp. 81–88. [Google Scholar]
- Chang, M.M.L.; Ong, S.K.; Nee, A.Y.C. AR-guided Product Disassembly for Maintenance and Remanufacturing. Procedia CIRP 2017, 61, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blanco, I.F.A.; Erkoyuncu, A.; Roy, R.; Wilding, S. Augmented Reality in Maintenance: An information-centred design framework. Procedia Manuf. 2018, 19, 148–155. [Google Scholar]
- Diao, P.H.; Shih, N.J. BIM-Based AR Maintenance System (BARMS) as an Intelligent Instruction Platform for Complex Plumbing Facilities. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Zhu, H.; Tang, D.; Nie, Q.; Zhou, T.; Wang, L.; Song, Y. Probing an intelligent predictive maintenance approach with deep learning and augmented reality for machine tools in IoT-enabled manufacturing. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2022, 77, 102357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amano, T.; Yamaguchi, H.; Higashino, T. Connected AR for Combating COVID-19. IEEE Internet Things Mag. 2020, 3, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xia, K.; Tang, T.; Mao, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Qu, H.; Li, H. Wearable smart multimeter equipped with AR glasses based on IoT platform. IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag. 2020, 23, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gu, L.; He, F.; Yangs, S. Crop Classification Based on Deep Learning in Northeast China using SAR and Optical Imagery. In Proceedings of the 2019 SAR in Big Data Era (BIGSARDATA), Beijing, China, 5–6 August 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Ye, X.; Hong, S.H.; Song, W.S.; Kim, Y.C.; Zhang, X. An Industry 4.0 Asset Administration Shell-Enabled Digital Solution for Robot-Based Manufacturing Systems. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 154448–154459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Built-in Display (Built-in Audio) | |
---|---|
AR View | Monocular |
FOV (Horizontal) | 16.8° |
Weight | 180 g |
Built-in audio | Yes (ear speaker) |
Microphone | Yes (noise canceling) |
Connectivity | Wi-Fi, Bluetooth |
Charging | USB-C |
Camera | 12 MP and 4K 30 FPS video |
Memory | 6 GB RAM—64 GB internal memory |
Battery | 1000 mAh internal battery |
Battery life | 2–3 h |
Controls | Touchpad, headmotion, and voice |
Operating system | Android 8.1 |
Chip | 8 Core 2.52 Ghz Qualcomm XR1 |
Compliances | IP 67, water, dust and drop resistant, and PPE |
Manufacturer | Vrexpert |
Country | Netherlands |
OS version | Android 10 |
Creator | Transition technologies PSC |
Software source | Transition technologies PSC in Poland |
Item Description | Before the Introduction of the System | After the Introduction of the System |
---|---|---|
Human resource | High | Low |
Paper operation | High | No paper operation |
Input cost | High human cost | High system construction cost |
Data integrity | Low | Actual equipment feedback |
Timeliness | Production data at work are the report data at the end of the previous day | Real-time feedback |
Degree of visualization | None | High |
Condition of equipment in the production line | Low degree of grasp or no real-time | A high degree of grasp/real-time feedback/alert notification |
Production arrangement | Failure to remove equipment faults without delay | Grasp real-time status, fault report |
Product yield | Low | High |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Shyr, W.-J.; Tsai, C.-J.; Lin, C.-M.; Liau, H.-M. Development and Assessment of Augmented Reality Technology for Using in an Equipment Maintenance and Diagnostic System. Sustainability 2022, 14, 12154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912154
Shyr W-J, Tsai C-J, Lin C-M, Liau H-M. Development and Assessment of Augmented Reality Technology for Using in an Equipment Maintenance and Diagnostic System. Sustainability. 2022; 14(19):12154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912154
Chicago/Turabian StyleShyr, Wen-Jye, Chi-Jui Tsai, Chia-Ming Lin, and Hung-Ming Liau. 2022. "Development and Assessment of Augmented Reality Technology for Using in an Equipment Maintenance and Diagnostic System" Sustainability 14, no. 19: 12154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912154
APA StyleShyr, W. -J., Tsai, C. -J., Lin, C. -M., & Liau, H. -M. (2022). Development and Assessment of Augmented Reality Technology for Using in an Equipment Maintenance and Diagnostic System. Sustainability, 14(19), 12154. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912154