Sustainability and Gender Dynamics of Coffee Value-Chain Development Intervention: Lessons from Ethiopia
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. The Coffee Quality Improvement and Market Linkage Project
3. Methodology
3.1. Qualitative Data Collection
3.2. Quantitative Data Collection
3.3. Data Analysis
4. Results and Discussions
4.1. Sustainability of the Technologies Promoted by the Intervention
4.2. Adaptations Made to Coffee Pulpers and Pulped Coffee
4.3. Social and Economic Benefits for Male and Female Farmers
4.3.1. Change in Farmers’ Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices
4.3.2. Improvement in Coffee Quality and its Sustainability
4.3.3. Market Linkage and Economic Gains
4.4. Gender Responsiveness and Gendered Outcome of the Intervention
4.4.1. Gender Sensitivity and Responsiveness of the Intervention
4.4.2. Influence of the Intervention on Women’s Role in Coffee Production, Processing, and Marketing
4.4.3. Access to and Control over Resources and Benefits
4.5. Pulping/Marketing Groups and Implications for Women’s Empowerment
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). Report of the WCED: Our Common Future; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
- Gnègnè1, Y. Assessing Sustainable Development: Toward a Portfolio of Indices. J. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 12, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. Developing Gender-Sensitive Value Chains—A Guiding Framework; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2016; p. 39. [Google Scholar]
- Minh, T.; Osei-Amponsah, C. Towards poor-centred value chain for sustainable development: A conceptual framework. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 29, 1223–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stoian, D.; Donovan, J.; Elias, M.; Blare, T. Fit for purpose? A review of guides for gender-equitable value chain development. Dev. Pract. 2018, 28, 494–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). Human Development Report 2011. Sustainability and Equity; United Nations Development Programme: New York, NY, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. National Gender Profile of Agriculture and Rural Livelihoods; Country Gender Assessment Series; FAO: Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2019; p. 84. [Google Scholar]
- ICO. Gender Equality in the Coffee Sector; An insight report from the International Coffee Organization. ICC-122-11; ICO: London, UK, 2018; p. 42. [Google Scholar]
- Pepper, A. Value Chain Development, Gender and Women’s Empowerment in Ghana; VAM Gender and Markets Study #1; Ndiaye, W., Ed.; World Food Program: Dakar, Senegal, 2016–2017; p. 63. Available online: https://docs.wfp.org/api/documents/WFP-0000022433/download/ (accessed on 12 August 2022).
- Riisgaard, L.; Bolwig, S.; Ponte, S.; Du Toit, A.; Halberg, N.; Matose, F. Integrating Poverty and Environmental Concerns into Value-Chain Analysis: A Strategic Framework and Practical Guide. Dev. Policy Rev. 2010, 28, 195–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Williams, F.; Taron, A. Demand-led extension: A gender analysis of attendance and key crops. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2020, 26, 383–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teshome, D.; Efa, N.; Woldemichael, G. Gender-based analysis of smallholder coffee production system in Goma woreda of Jima zone. Gender Differentials for Planning Agricultural Research. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Gender Analysis in Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 27–29 November 2006; pp. 51–62. [Google Scholar]
- International Trade Centre (ITC). Women in Coffee. In Proceedings of the International Trade Forum 3&4, Mexico City, Mexico, 9–13 April 2018; pp. 32–33. [Google Scholar]
- ICO. The Value of Coffee. Sustainability, Inclusiveness, and Resilience of the Coffee Global Value Chain; Coffee Development Report 2020; ICO: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kemal, F.; Emana, B.; Shumeta, Z. Analysis of Gender Role in Coffee Value Chain in Jimma Zone, Oromia National Regional State, Ethiopia. Eur. J. Bus. Manag. 2019, 11, 31. [Google Scholar]
- Gella, A.; Tadele, G. Gender and Farming in Ethiopia: An Exploration Discourses and Implications for Policy and Research. Ethiop. J. Soc. Sci. Humanit. 2015, 11, 1–28. [Google Scholar]
- Ragasa, C.; Berhane, G.; Tadesse, F.; Seyoum, A. Gender Differences in Access to Extension Services and Agricultural Productivity. J. Agric. Educ. Ext. 2013, 19, 437–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cohn, M.J.; Lemma, M. Agricultural Extension Services and Gender Equality. An Institutional Analysis of Four Districts in Ethiopia; Ethiopia Strategy Support Program II (ESSP II) Working Paper 28; IFPRI: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Ogato, G.S.; Boon, E.K.; Subramani, J. Improving Access to Productive Resources and agricultural services through gender empowerment: A case study of three rural communities in Ambo district, Ethiopia. J. Hum. Ecol. 2009, 27, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mulema, A.A.; Damtew, E. Gender-Based Constraints and Opportunities to Agricultural Intensification in Ethiopia: A Systematic Review; ILRI project report; ILRI: Nairobi, Kenya, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Achandi, E.; Mujawamariya, G.; Agboh-Noameshie, A.; Gebremariam, S.; Rahalivavololona, N.; Rodenburg, J. Women’s access to agricultural technologies in rice production and processing hubs: A comparative analysis of Ethiopia, Madagascar and Tanzania. J. Rural Stud. 2018, 60, 188–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Petit, N. Ethiopia’s coffee sector: A bitter or better future. J. Agrar. Chang. 2007, 7, 225–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Efa, N.; Oduor, G.; Musebe, R.; Agwanda, C.; Akiri, M. Role of low-cost simple technologies to enhance commercialization of smallholders: Lessons from Ethiopia. Agric. Dev. 2014, 21, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
- Fitzpatrick, E. Assessing Sustainability in Development Interventions. In Transformational Change for People and the Planet; Sustainable Development Goals Series; Uitto, J.I., Batra, G., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- March, C.; Smyth, I.; Mukhopadhyay, M. A Guide to Gender-Analysis Framework; Oxfam GB: Oxford, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Jansen, K.; Vellema, S. What is Technography? NJAS-Wagening. J. Life Sci. 2011, 57, 169–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Musebe, R. Improving Coffee Quality in East and Central Africa through Enhanced Primary Processing Practices (Ethiopia and Rwanda); Baseline survey report of coffee processing systems in Ethiopia; CABI: Wallingford, UK, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Haggar, J.; Rodenburg, J. Lessons on enabling African smallholder farmers, especially women and youth, to benefit from sustainable agricultural intensification. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2021, 19, 636–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kruijssen, F.; McDougall, C.; van Asseldonk, I. Gender and aquaculture value chains: A review of key issues and implications for research. Aquaculture 2018, 493, 328–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teklewold, H.; Kassie, M.; Shiferaw, B. Adoption of multiple sustainable agricultural practices in rural Ethiopia. J. Agric. Econ. 2013, 64, 597–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tavenner, K.; Crane, T. Gender power in Kenyan dairy: Cows, commodities, and commercialization. Agric. Hum. Values 2018, 35, 701–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- FAO. Gender in Agriculture. Closing the Gender Gap; Quisumbing, A., Meinzen-Dick, R., Raney, T., Croppenstedt, A., Behrman, J., Peterman, A., Eds.; FAO: Rome, Italy; Springer Science + Business Media B.V.: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2014. [Google Scholar]
Type of KIIs and FGDs | Number | Gender | |
---|---|---|---|
Men | Women | ||
FGD of coffee experts | 4 | 3 | 1 |
General FGD of project-participants (3 groups) and non-participant farmers including spouses (2 groups) | 5 | Mixed | Mixed |
GAM FGDs for male project-participant farmers and their spouses | 4 | 2 | 2 |
KIIs of coffee experts (both those who took part in the implementation of the intervention and those who did not) | 8 | 7 | 1 |
KIIs of farmers (five project-participant and three non-participant farmers) | 8 | 4 | 4 |
KIIs with ECX centres | 2 | 2 | |
KII with coffee traders (suppliers) | 3 | 3 | |
KII with pulping machine supplier | 1 | 1 | |
KIIs with unions (managers) | 1 | 1 | |
KIIs of district officials | 7 | 6 | 1 |
Region | Zone and District | Number of Small Pulpers Supplied by the Project (2004) | Number of Small Pulpers During the Current Study (2015) ** |
---|---|---|---|
Oromia | Jimma zone | 25 | 51 |
Illubabor zone | 25 | 34 | |
West/Kelem Wellega * | 0 | 20 | |
SNNP | Bench Maji | 25 | 25 |
Sheka | 25 | 27 | |
Gedio * | 0 | 15 | |
Sidama * | 0 | 8 | |
Total | 100 | 180 |
Type of Improved Practice | Project-Participant Farmers (N = 197) (%) | Non-Participant Farmers (N = 200) (%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
High | Moderate | Low | High | Moderate | Low | |
Proper coffee harvesting—selectively picking ripe cherries | 91 | 9 | - | 78 | 19 | 3 |
Proper coffee drying on raised beds | 86 | 14 | - | 69 | 24 | 7 |
Pulping (semi-washing) and drying coffee | 54 | 26 | 20 | 17 | 34 | 49 |
Proper storage and handling | 66 | 32.5 | 1.5 | 31 | 55.5 | 13.5 |
Alle District | Sheko District | Gomma District |
---|---|---|
|
|
|
Level of Involvement | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Men | Women | Boys | Girls | |
1. Coffee production, processing and marketing | ||||
Coffee production and processing | ||||
| ** | ** | * | * |
| ** | *** | * | ** |
| *** | * | ** | |
| ** | *** | ** | ** |
| ** | * | ** | * |
| * | *** | * | ** |
| ** | * | * | * |
| *** | * | ** | |
| *** | * | * | |
| * | *** | ** | ** |
| * | ** | * | ** |
| * | *** | * | *** |
| *** | ** | ||
| *** | * | ** | * |
| * | *** | * | *** |
Coffee marketing | ||||
| * | *** | * | * |
| *** | |||
2. Benefits | ||||
Access | ||||
| *** | * | ||
| *** | *** | * | * |
| *** | *** | * | * |
| *** | *** | * | * |
Control | ||||
| *** | ** | ||
| *** | ** | ||
| *** | ** |
Labour | Time | Resources | Culture | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Women | (+) Modern drying beds made drying cherry simpler (+) Learnt new skills (−) Selective picking of cherry added to workload (−) Pulping increased demand for labour (work-load) (+) were able to hire labourers (+) Employment opportunity | (+) Pulped coffee dries faster than cherry (+) Use of drying beds shortens drying period (−) Selective picking of cherry requires longer time | (−) Processing facilities were given to HH head (+) Improved access to processing facility (+) Increased income (+) Improved control over income (−) Wholesale of coffee by men; had implications for decision-making and control over income | (+) Raised women’s social status and confidence (+) Promoted saving culture (+) Opportunity to actively participate in processing activities (−) Women were required to do pulping of coffee—workload |
Men | (+) Men no longer needed to carry much wood to construct drying beds (+) Learnt new skills (+) Were able to hire labour (−) Pulping increased labour demand | (+) Drying coffee on beds saved time (+) Men were required to spend time on their coffee (−) Demand for more time meant less leisure time | (+) Increased income (+) Maintained similar access and control | (+) Raised participant farmers’ social status (+) Boosted saving and investment (+) Fostered a positive attitude of family members about coffee activities |
Household (HH) | (+) Responsibility shared among members (+) HH was able to hire labour (−) Some practices increased workload | (+) Family members spent more time working together (−) Time for leisure was reduced (−) Women had less time for family | (+) Knowledge and skill shared among members (+) Increased income and family welfare (+) Improved access to processing facilities (+) Linked to market | (+) All members of the household got involved in the work (+) Motivated to produce coffee (+) Promoted saving and investment culture |
Community | (+) Introduced new technologies (+) Employment opportunity | (+) Copied practices/ technology that reduced workload (−) Started working for longer periods | (+) Diffusion of new skills and practices (+) Improved coffee quality, attracted better prices (+) Less water, low pollution of environment | (+) Change in behaviour and practices (+) Improved image of coffee of the area (+) Prestige for the community |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gurmessa, N.E.; Agwanda, C.; Oduor, G.; Musebe, R.O.; Akiri, M.; Romney, D. Sustainability and Gender Dynamics of Coffee Value-Chain Development Intervention: Lessons from Ethiopia. Sustainability 2022, 14, 11928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911928
Gurmessa NE, Agwanda C, Oduor G, Musebe RO, Akiri M, Romney D. Sustainability and Gender Dynamics of Coffee Value-Chain Development Intervention: Lessons from Ethiopia. Sustainability. 2022; 14(19):11928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911928
Chicago/Turabian StyleGurmessa, Negussie Efa, Charles Agwanda, George Oduor, Richard O. Musebe, Morris Akiri, and Dannie Romney. 2022. "Sustainability and Gender Dynamics of Coffee Value-Chain Development Intervention: Lessons from Ethiopia" Sustainability 14, no. 19: 11928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911928
APA StyleGurmessa, N. E., Agwanda, C., Oduor, G., Musebe, R. O., Akiri, M., & Romney, D. (2022). Sustainability and Gender Dynamics of Coffee Value-Chain Development Intervention: Lessons from Ethiopia. Sustainability, 14(19), 11928. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141911928