Next Article in Journal
In-Season Monitoring of Maize Leaf Water Content Using Ground-Based and UAV-Based Hyperspectral Data
Previous Article in Journal
Techno-Economic Analysis of Indonesia Power Generation Expansion to Achieve Economic Sustainability and Net Zero Carbon 2050
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sustainability
Volume 14
Issue 15
10.3390/su14159036
Review Report
sustainability-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Article
Peer-Review Record

Location of Logistics Distribution Center Based on Improved Bald Eagle Algorithm

Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 9036; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159036
by Yanfen Tong 1,2 and Xianbao Cheng 3,4,*
Reviewer 1:
Ravinder Kumar
Reviewer 2:
Amir Faisal
Reviewer 3:
Teguh Herlambang
Reviewer 4:
Mehdi Safari
Sustainability 2022, 14(15), 9036; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159036
Submission received: 4 July 2022 / Revised: 17 July 2022 / Accepted: 19 July 2022 / Published: 23 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Urban and Rural Development)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Improve the result discussion

1. Improve the literature review in the introduction section and highlight the significance of the paper.
2. Figure 1 is enhanced.
3. Draw a flowchart of the proposed strategy.
4. Clearly describe the hardware and software components in the experimental section.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

Does this work a pure simulation or has any real implication in a real logistic distribution center? For example, what is the unit of the real physical distance in Fig. 2-6? Is it separated 1-kilometer distance between the center and its branches? Please clarify this unit issue in your manuscript. Thanks.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 3 Report

Good Comparison Between PSO, WCA, WOA and BES with 10 Test function

Author Response

Thank you very much

Reviewer 4 Report

1- What is the main innovation of your work compared to previous studies?

2- Authors should present the most important results of their research in the abstract of the article.

3-It is better for the authors to present the method used and the results for each reference in the introduction section.

4- It is better for the authors to provide more complete explanations about the functions used in Table 1.

5- Explain the difference between the results obtained in Figures 2 and 3.

6- Considering the calculation time and the obtained results, it seems that the results obtained from PSO method  are more appropriate than the other methods. If this is not the case, the authors should provide a more complete explanation and interpretation.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 4 Report

The paper can be accepted in the present form.

Author Response

Thank you very much

This manuscript is a resubmission of an earlier submission. The following is a list of the peer review reports and author responses from that submission.


Back to TopTop