2.1. Literature Review
Under the Vision 2030 framework, the strategic objectives of the Saudi National Transformation Policy (NTP) consist of improving Saudi recruitment, training and development policies of instructors, learning with creativity and innovation, an employment-oriented curriculum, and designing student’s education according to the need of the nation’s growth and education and private sectors’ linkage as per labor market demand [
22,
44,
45]. Reducing dependency on the oil sector, strategic partnership, increasing productivity, and creating job opportunities are the critical plans of Saudi Arabia, contributing to economic sustainability and leading to employment generation and the sustainable development of the county [
46]. The Vision 2030 program of the Saudi government has emphasized its entrepreneurial training program to explore the growth opportunities for its existing young manpower [
20,
45]. Applying e-learning tools in online learning significantly affects the students’ engagement [
47]. Learners’ social networking in exchanging and constructing knowledge is significant in the formal learning management system (LMS) [
48]. Moreover, the students’ portals help the higher educational institutions to upgrade their established services. The “Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)” results show that the highest acceptance level of education consists of e-lectures, then in-person classroom discussion, and finally, web-based platforms [
49]. Raoufi et al. [
50] determined seven components in developing e-learning models, including infrastructure, education culture, learner, and evaluation. In e-learning, the factors leading to successful pedagogical delivery consist of university learners’ and instructors’ competency, instructor attitude towards learners, approaches, content organization, teaching strategies, online technology, feedback process, and instructor’s training [
51].
Advancement in ICT has impacted the education system in the last two decades, especially in e-learning and virtual education, moving away from the traditional educational system’s limitations in education, research, and entrepreneurship [
52]. Khan [
53], in his framework, stated that web-based systems have become powerful learning interface tools. In addition, he explored his framework in eight dimensions: “institutional, management, technological, pedagogical, ethical, interface design, resource support, and evaluation”. The advancement in ICTs has improved the quality of humans worldwide in the context of sustainable education [
54,
55]. In addition, the online framework and relative pedagogical initiatives to students’ engagement in higher education contributed to an essential improvement in the field of teaching and learning [
56].
ICTs can help bridge the socio-economic gap in developing countries’ female population. E-learning has contributed enormously to strengthening individuals and organizations [
57]. Khan and Ghadially [
58] emphasized the social, economic, educational, and psychological empowerment that came with computers and information technology. Duckworth and Maxwell [
59] analyzed the mentor’s role in the education sector, and their contribution to social empowerment. Martínez-Cerdá et al. [
60] examined the issues concerning e-learning. They tested the validity of the “Socio-Technical E-learning Employability System of Measurement (STELEM)” framework, which focuses on employability based on education, knowledge acquisition, and students and organizational learning.
Radcliffe [
61] stated that the labor force’s knowledge and skills are a crucial determinant of economic growth and have a distinguishing impact on developed and developing countries. He further elaborated that the increasing effect of education on the workforce of a country has a growing impact on the nation’s productivity. Whalley [
62] demonstrated that revenues in an economy increase with the growing level of education in society. Various studies have reported the role of education, training, and skill development in employment generation and economic growth. Hodson and Phelps [
63] studied the role of education and skills in the emerging knowledge economy, and emphasized the importance of education and training to increase the earning potential of individuals. Giarini [
64] stated that higher education reduces the default risk of unemployment and leads to excellent labor market stability. As suggested by Ionela [
65], people with higher education and training have a better participation rate and an extended period of active life in the labor market than others. Moreover, a higher-level education and training enables individuals to better integrate and adapt to labor market demands.
Khan and Ghadially [
58] stated four dimensions of socio-economic empowerment, namely, societal, economic, psychological, and educational, and emphasized computer education and internet technology usage. Francescato and Mebane [
18] illustrated the contextual factors that foster personal, organizational, and community empowerment. Their study elaborated that online and face-to-face learning significantly affect students’ professional development and social empowerment. E-learning enhances IT skills, which leads to societal employability and competitiveness in industry [
66]. Lambrechts et al. [
32] suggested that empowerment and a sustainable development framework for employees’ professional development led to organizational change. Social networking and web-based collaborative learning technologies are critical to improving society’s quality and satisfaction with learning [
67].
Educational institutions and telecommunication industries can collaborate to promote online learning to learners and instructors/trainers to fulfill corporate social responsibilities on their part [
6]. Academic empowerment of women has an indirect effect on their economic, social, and managerial status, and a positive direct effect on political empowerment. Women’s economic, social, and political status can be managed by designing a suitable academic and political framework [
68]. Salloum et al. [
69] defined the factors that affect students’ learning in higher education. In addition, they developed a model to evaluate the impact of innovation, trust, quality of teaching, and knowledge sharing through the e-learning mode. Rahmani et al. [
70] emphasized virtual learning, evaluation tools, cloud-based learning, and employee creativity through e-learning programs. Bekmanova et al. [
71] examined three models based on intelligent learning and presented the effectiveness criteria for evaluation training courses.
Arab people’s career prospects depend on their education level, family values, and loyalty to a particular cultural group or organization [
72]. Islamic principles and Arab countries’ values have a significant cultural dimension. Human activities concerning cultural, social, emotional, and intellectual perspectives connect with information and pedagogical technology [
73]. Hamdan [
74] examined learning cultural relationships with e-learning strategies and applied technologies. “Educating yourself in Empowerment (EYE)” is a self-learning tool for student empowerment, leading to sustainable development while achieving higher education [
75]. Weber et al. [
76] aligned teaching with transformative learning by applying a tool of network science, and evaluated that network science is a valuable tool to solve complex students’ problems [
67]. Turnbull et al. [
77] experienced five challenges in e-learning and teaching: “synchronous/asynchronous learning, technology, competence, academic dishonesty, and privacy and confidentially” during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The constructivist learning environment is student-centered, engaging, and reflective, and provides a framework for the students to learn and explore their experiences [
78]. Such an environment presumes an attentive and thoughtful pattern of learning [
20,
79,
80]. Aldossari [
20] critically evaluated the lifelong learning landscape in Saudi Arabia compared to the performance of OECD countries. Critical pedagogy is significant for learners; it creates social consciousness leading to personal and social empowerment [
81]. Kamoche and Mueller [
82] focused on consolidating the knowledge and learning to enhance the competence and capabilities of employees at the workplace. Lejeune et al. [
83] examined the relationship between employees’ development plans, learnings, and perceived performance. Research demonstrates that digitalization is essentially required in higher education to create well-qualified professionals to align with industry demand [
84]. The study by Smith et al. [
85] elucidated how designing a learning framework can improve education. Pedagogical techniques and learning tools facilitate the students to effectively acquire knowledge and develop their minds with global competence [
86]. The instructors with more teaching experience in the online environment show a higher level of pedagogical exposure [
87]. The academic staff, cultural foundation, and corporate alignment of the universities/higher institutions provide a strong base for leadership and sustainability [
88].
Constructivism has appeared as a solid theoretical base to explore how students learn and construct their knowledge in association with real-world situations [
89]. In an empirical study based on 910 students at times t1 and t2, constructivism emphasized students’ engagement in knowledge construction and meaningful reflection [
90,
91,
92]. Živkovic [
37], in a study based on ESP (English for specific purposes), emphasized preparing students as professionals to deal with real-world situations as committed lifelong learners. Technology (ICT) in education, empowering the society (learners), has been playing a significant role in transforming intellectuals (teachers’ role) by implementing pedagogical technology, leading to sustainable development [
42]. In a study conducted on 3757 students [
93], final-year university students were analyzed to determine the university’s role in social transformation. The study’s outcomes stated that sustainability justice-oriented education needs ideal and committed instructors who can take a challenge and apply their best effort to develop a sustainable society. In a triangulation study by Yildirim and Kasapogulu [
40], data were collected on constructivist teaching and learning by distributing questionnaires to students and conducting interviews with the teachers. In another empirical study conducted on 298 male and female students, the social constructivism theory emphasized the active students’ learning, in which students, as the learners, built their knowledge in a particular social connectedness, along with cultural development, with real-world situations [
41].
2.2. Constructivism Approach to Learning and Teaching
The current research applies constructivism, an approach to human-centric learning in which the learners build their knowledge by themselves and are measured by their experiences [
26]. Arends [
94] believes constructivism means the personal construction of learners through their own experiences, and affected by their prior experience, knowledge, and nearby events. The principle of constructivism states that learners construct new knowledge about their previous learning. Past learnings influence the new learning or knowledge a person has built from his current knowledge and experience [
27]. Constructivism states that learning is a dynamic process in which learners individually or as a group make their knowledge through their active involvement with real-world problems. Dewey [
25] noted that learning is a social phenomenon where humans act and interact with others, rather than just an idea. Therefore, society plays a prominent role in building an environment where young learners grow and develop their intellectual competence [
30]. The constructivist theory states that learners constantly try to enhance their knowledge by experiencing real-world phenomena. As they receive any learnings or experiences from the outside world, they quickly update their mental frame to reflect the unique experience and access the latest information from their interpretation.
Constructivism theory of teaching–learning narrates how learning occurs, regardless of whether students, as learners, use their instruction in education or in manufacturing a product [
11]. Social constructivism is the sociocultural theory of learning [
24,
30], in which human beings construct their knowledge in their respective fields. This is affected by politics, power, economics, ideologies, and social factors [
27], through education, training (mentor as an educator), and learning (students as learners), and through effective and meaningful instructional and educational practices. Later, they apply their knowledge and experience to build a society through social empowerment and sustainable development. Furthermore, psychological constructivism is the development approach to learning; an individual learner actively builds their knowledge around their background knowledge [
24]. Personal growth occurs when the individual within the group becomes an individual member with a relationship with others, and formally gives social meaning to their knowledge [
95,
96].
This study mainly applies social and psychological constructivism and the cognitive approach to education and learning. In the cognitive learning framework, the students add new knowledge to existing knowledge. They make appropriate updates in the current knowledge base to fit current information. Secondly, this research applied the principles of social constructivism. Vygotsky defined social constructivism [
30], stating that it is collaborative learning and the knowledge generated through learners’ interactions in collaboration with society and culture. Glasersfeld [
28] identified the notion of radical constructs; according to him, knowledge is invented rather than gained from human perception or discovery. The learning theory of constructivism also focuses on technology-based teaching methods rather than traditional ones. Among the technologically advanced economies, Saudi Arabia is one of the major economies globally, being technologically advanced and implementing technology-based teaching and learning to educate learners [
45]. As per the constructivist classroom, the teachers’ role is to facilitate students, and the students are the learners [
96]. Honebein [
97] stated seven teaching goals, summarized as the knowledge construction process, providing experience and appreciation, learning in a natural context, student-centered learning, using multiple technological tools of representation, and reflecting on the knowledge construction process.
2.3. Hypotheses Development
Learners build their knowledge [
26], resulting in personal construction [
94], and their previous learning influences new learning [
27]; individual development gives social meaning to society [
30,
95,
96]. Education and training leads to productive human capital, the knowledge base of an economy, and economic growth [
98]. The Saudi government’s entrepreneurial training program under the Vision 2030 program explores the growth opportunities for its existing young workforce [
20,
45]. As stated in the cognitive psychological principle, constructivism is a view in which an individual learner constructs knowledge based on his experience [
37]. Knowledge is a societal artifact built as an outcome of the interchange between instructor and learner [
99]. Personal constructivism emphasizes knowledge construction in which individuals construct knowledge to fulfill their needs [
99]. Learning turns into the construction of new knowledge through reading/listening/exploring (education, training, and learning) and experiencing, which causes the assimilation and accommodation of knowledge, and leads to new understandings and cognitivism [
33]. Learners apply their knowledge and experience to build a society through social empowerment and sustainable development [
18,
32]. Social innovation in higher education integrates the nation’s responsibility toward social empowerment and sustainable development [
100] (Hypotheses H1 and H2). The theory of constructivism emphasizes the learners’ active role in the construction of knowledge that is significant for both individuals and society, and the validity of constructed knowledge and its representation in the real-world [
101]. Constructivism in higher education allows learners to gain real-world experience, as well as increased understanding of social and scientific concepts and their applications in a societal context, and its reflection on the personal and social lives of the learners [
33]. According to Glasersfeld [
35], knowledge is primarily not passively acquired but actively constructed by individuals. Secondly, the goal of learning has been recognized as the meaningful experience of the world [
99].
Constructivism is explored here as the human-centric approach of constructivism to teaching and learning, in which the instructors facilitate active discussion with their students as learners. This process of knowledge construction created a social and sustainable environment [
27], resulting in employment generation and social empowerment. Finally, it helps build a nation with proposed government policies [
21,
45]. Educational policies, learning models, students’ support, and facilities are the essential factors in learners’ satisfaction, engagement, and outcome [
102,
103]. Similar to the Adams [
104] study, we explore performance-based educational policy (Hypotheses H3 and H4).
The constructivist theory also emphasizes that knowledge develops a particular environment, such as cultural and social context, with connectedness to others [
34]. The science of gaining knowledge (through ETL) and developing understanding, leading to constructivism, has a combined impact on socio-cultural development [
33]. The constructivism theory asserts experience-based constructive learning, which stresses the direct experience of acquiring knowledge, in which students get involved with the world by applying their perspectives [
105]. The social constructivism theory emphasizes the students’ active learning, in which students as the learners build their knowledge in a particular social connectedness, along with cultural development with real-world situations [
41]. Social constructivism is the socio-cultural learning theory [
24,
30], and student-centered learning reflects the knowledge construction process [
97] (Hypotheses H5 and H6).
Saudi Arabia is an emerging economy, and education, training, and e-learning are significant aspects in the generation of social empowerment and sustainable employment, following the national culture and government policy of the kingdom [
34]. This study develops hypotheses by applying the constructivism approach of teaching and learning in the context of Saudi society, leading to social empowerment and sustainable development. First, the study attempts to explore the hypotheses through the knowledge construction of the community (students as a learner) and its development by applying the constructivist approach to teaching (training-led education) and learning (student-led learning) (ETL). Then, the knowledgeable/developed society results in societal empowerment in a healthy national culture and conductive government policies, leading to sustainable employment generation in the kingdom [
20,
34]. The study uses the technology-based education method to evaluate the influence of education, training, and e-learning on sustainable employment generation and social empowerment. Furthermore, it applies the government policies and national culture as the moderating variables, and develops the hypotheses accordingly.
Based on the literature review, we propose the following hypotheses for this study:
H1. Education, training and e-learning have a significant relationship with sustainable employment generation in Saudi Arabia in the COVID-19 era.
H2. Education, training and e-learning have a significant relationship with social empowerment in Saudi Arabia in the COVID-19 era.
H3. Government policies moderate the relationship between education, training, and e-learning and sustainable employment generation in Saudi Arabia in the COVID-19 era.
H4. Government policies moderate the relationship between education, training, and e-learning and social empowerment in the Saudi Arabia in the COVID-19 era.
H5. National culture of Saudi Arabia moderates the relationship between education, training, and e-learning and sustainable employment generation in the COVID-19 era.
H6. National culture of Saudi Arabia moderates the relationship between education, training, and e-learning and social empowerment in the COVID-19 era.