Next Article in Journal
What about Responsible Consumption? A Survey Focused on Food Waste and Consumer Habits
Previous Article in Journal
An Energy Storage Assessment: Using Frequency Modulation Approach to Capture Optimal Coordination
Previous Article in Special Issue
Food Waste Perception of Workplace Canteen Users—A Case Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue “Sustainable Food Production and Consumption”

1
GreenUPorto—Sustainable Agrifood Production Research Centre, Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, 823, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal
2
LEPABE—Laboratory for Process Engineering, Environment, Biotechnology and Energy, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
3
ALiCE—Associate Laboratory in Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(14), 8508; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148508
Submission received: 2 July 2022 / Accepted: 5 July 2022 / Published: 12 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainable Food Production and Consumption)

1. Editorial on Special Issue

This Special Issue (SI) “Sustainable Food Production and Consumption” intends to be the union of multidisciplinary areas of knowledge, under the sustainability pillar, based on knowledge about one of the most relevant agents for overall environmental impacts: food production and consumption.
The SI aims to highlight sustainability assessment within agri-food production, food consumption, and food waste reduction to meet the needs of updating knowledge and developing new skills required by multiple social and economic agents. The purpose is to shine a light on the significance of research and practical initiatives engaged in the United Nations Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development, specifically in protecting the planet by promoting sustainability in food production and consumption aiming at informing and influencing policy and practice globally.
The research needs to move on towards combined efforts to sustainable food systems that are translated by the articles presented below.
Reducing food loss and waste is prioritized in the UN sustainable development goals (SDG) target 12.3 to contribute to “ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns”. It is expected to significantly improve global food security and mitigate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
Food waste occurs in all stages of the food supply chain, namely at home and in the food service sector and has a huge impact on loss of sustainability. This special issue includes 8 out of 14 papers dedicated to different approaches of food waste in different settings.
The paper from Iva Pires et al. (contribution number 1) stated that Portuguese canteen users showed an accurate perception of their plate waste and excessive portions were identified by consumers as the main reason for plate waste.
Ronja Teschner et al. (contribution number 2) analyzed how and to what extent different state and non-state actors in Switzerland incorporate sustainability aspects in their dietary guidelines. It examines how these DGs account for different dimensions at the basis of sustainability thinking, including the classic environmental, economic, and social dimensions as well as issues of health and governance.
Margarida Liz Martins et al. (contribution number 3) reported that food waste at care institutions is a matter of great concern, that requires regular monitoring, representing 36.1% of meals served, composed of 24.1% leftovers and 12.0% plate waste. The wasted meals would be enough to feed 1486 older adults and would correspond to annual losses of approximately €107,112. High values of leftovers are related to the food service system and staff, pointing to the need for improvements during the planning and processing of meals. On the other hand, high plate waste values are associated with consumers, indicating the low adequacy of the menu in reagards to older adults’ habits and preferences.
In Norway, Kai Victor Hansen et al. (contribution number 4) referred that approximately 992.6 tons of food per year could potentially be saved with only a single change, ultimately ameliorating the unsustainable food consumption problem among residents of nursing homes.
The paper from Nouf Sahal Alharbi et al. (contribution number 5) reported that tray waste arising at the ward level of hospitals across Saudi Arabia, equated to 4831 tons of food, 3535 tons of plastic, 1414 tons of paper, and 235 tons of metal each year. As all of this waste ends up in landfills, without any form of recycling, the paper published proposes the need for a more comprehensive, political approach that unites all food system stakeholders around a shared vision of responsible consumption and sustainable development.
Another paper by Se-Hak Chun and Ariunzaya Nyam-Ochir from Mongolia (contribution number 6) showed that food quality, service quality, price, and the atmosphere of a restaurant positively influences customer satisfaction and their intention to revisit global fast-food restaurants.
Also, Taíse Portugal et al. (contribution number 7) evaluated household food waste by Portuguese families and reported a positive attitude concerning buying, consumption, and wastage, revealing a particular awareness of food waste and its social and environmental impact.
Xuezhen Guo et al. (contribution number 8) stated that findings with policy implications is that priorities for Food Loss and Waste reduction vary, dependent on prioritized sustainability criteria (e.g., GHG emissions versus protein losses).
The paper from Philipp Schepelmann et al. (contribution number 9) provided an integrated assessment of environmental and socio-economic effects arising from the final consumption of food products by European households by applying environmentally extended input–output analysis (EE-IOA). Results shows that European food consumption generates relatively less environmental pressures outside Europe (due to imports) than average European consumption. The results highlight the importance of directing specific research and policy efforts towards food consumption to support the transition to a more sustainable food system in line with the objectives of the EU Farm to Fork Strategy.
The work from Manuel Navarro Gausa et al. (contribution number 10) describes tools to engage different stakeholders, such as architects, product designers, and citizens, from a cultural point of view. The research focus and educational campaign and an open platform where prototypes, new materials, and products are developed as inspiration for change. The Creative Food Cycles (CFC) project is described to address the topic of food as a cross-cutting factor and powerful accelerator toward the co-design of sustainability in cities. Food waste and food losses are shown to be a powerful tool for raising awareness of sustainable development at the community level.
The paper from Brent Stoffle et al. (contribution number 11) describes the sustainable adaptations to the littoral, which included both marine and terrestrial components, by the people of Barbados and The Bahamas, in the Caribbean that have lived in a sustainable way for five generations. The analysis is based on interviews conducted towards the practices of sustainable food use and environmental preservation. The findings document the need for local gardens and exchanges to prepare for perturbations caused by climate change, economic withdrawal, and development intrusion.
The research from Miguel Vigil et al. (contribution number 12) presented techniques to address two major issues regarding fresh-cut vegetables washing operations: the current low water recirculation rate and the use of chlorinated compounds as sanitizing agents. The authors perform a life cycle assessment (LCA) to assess the environmental effects of these new solutions and to compare those impacts with the burden derived from the current strategy. The novel technologies show to decrease the environmental burden, mainly due to the enhanced water recirculation and the subsequent decrease in energy consumption for pumping and cooling the water stream.
At the end, Gerald C. Shurson et al. (contribution number 13) looked at food waste as a major barrier to achieving global food security and environmental sustainability. The author identifies the potentials from repurposing food waste streams into animal feed, from pre-harvest to post-consumer stages of supply chains. The need for risk assessments is explicitly mentioned together with the development of extensive biosecurity protocols, especially for pathogenic viruses, to minimize the risk of pathogen and prion transmission. Overall, it is mentioned the need for a wide range of society agents (as governments, citizens and entrepreneurs) to build food waste collection and processing infrastructures economically and environmentally sustainable.

2. List of Contributions

  • Pires, I.; Machado, J.; Rocha, A.; Liz Martins, M. Food Waste Perception of Workplace Canteen Users—A Case Study. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1324.
  • Teschner, R.; Ruppen, J.; Bornemann, B.; Emmenegger, R.; Sánchez, L.A.; Mapping Sustainable Diets: A Comparison of Sustainability References in Dietary Guidelines of Swiss Food Governance Actors. Sustainability 2021, 13, 12076.
  • Liz Martins, M.; Henriques, A.S.; Rocha, A. Evaluation of Food Waste at a Portuguese Geriatric Institution. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2452.
  • Hansen, K.V.; Derdowski, L.A. Sustainable Food Consumption in Nursing Homes: Less Food Waste with the Right Plate Color? Sustainability 2020, 12, 6525.
  • Sahal Alharbi, N.; Yahia Qattan, M.; Haji Alhaji, J. Towards Sustainable Food Services in Hospitals: Expanding the Concept of ‘Plate Waste’ to ‘Tray Waste’. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6872.
  • Chun, S.H.; Nyam-Ochir, A. The Effects of Fast Food Restaurant Attributes on Customer Satisfaction, Revisit Intention, and Recommendation Using DINESERV Scale. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7435.
  • Portugal, T.; Freitas, S.; Cunha, L.M.; Rocha, A.M.C.N. Evaluation of Determinants of Food Waste in Family Households in the Greater Porto Area Based on Self-Reported Consumption Practices. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8781.
  • Guo, X.Z.; Broeze, J.; Groot, J.J.; Axmann, H.; Vollebregt, M. A Worldwide Hotspot Analysis on Food Loss and Waste, Associated Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Protein Losses. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7488.
  • Schepelmann, P.; Vercalsteren, A.; Acosta-Fernandez, J.; Saurat, M.; Boonen, K.; Christis, M.; Marin, G.; Zoboli, R.; Maguire, C. Driving Forces of Changing Environmental Pressures from Consumption in the European Food System. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8265.
  • Navarro Gausa, M.; Pericu, S.; Canessa, N.; Tucci, G. Creative Food Cycles: A Cultural Approach to the Food Life-Cycles in Cities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6487.
  • Stoffle, B.; Stoffle, R.; Van Vlack, K. Sustainable Use of the Littoral by Traditional People of Barbados and Bahamas. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4764.
  • Vigil, M.; Pedrosa Laza, M.; Moran-Palacios, H.; Alvarez Cabal, J.V. Optimizing the Environmental Profile of Fresh-Cut Produce: Life Cycle Assessment of Novel Decontamination and Sanitation Techniques. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3674.
  • Shurson, G.C. “What a Waste”—Can We Improve Sustainability of Food Animal Production Systems by Recycling Food Waste Streams into Animal Feed in an Era of Health, Climate, and Economic Crises? Sustainability 2020, 12, 7071.

Funding

This work was financially supported by LA/P/0045/2020 (ALiCE), UIDB/00511/2020 and UIDP/00511/2020 (LEPABE), funded by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) and within the scope of UIDB/05748/2020 e UIDP/05748/2020.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the financial supported by LA/P/0045/2020 (ALiCE), UIDB/00511/2020 and UIDP/00511/2020 (LEPABE), funded by national funds through FCT/MCTES (PIDDAC) and within the scope of UIDB/05748/2020 e UIDP/05748/2020.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rocha, A.; Neto, B. Special Issue “Sustainable Food Production and Consumption”. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148508

AMA Style

Rocha A, Neto B. Special Issue “Sustainable Food Production and Consumption”. Sustainability. 2022; 14(14):8508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148508

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rocha, Ada, and Belmira Neto. 2022. "Special Issue “Sustainable Food Production and Consumption”" Sustainability 14, no. 14: 8508. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148508

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop