1. Introduction
Nowadays, one of the most important concerns of city managers is improving citizens’ quality of life in the context of sustainable development. In urban areas, land and space are significant. They are major driving factors in the economic sectors, such as doing business [
1]. Developing cities have competitive benefits for development [
2].
Cities have competed with each other since their inception. Today, with the increase of urbanization and the complexity of urban systems, the scope and dimensions of competition have increased. Thus, the competitiveness of cities has become one of the main issues in planning for the sustainability of cities. At present, cities consume about 75% of the world’s resources [
3]. Thus, cities are competing for resources.
According to the United Nations and the World Bank, in 2018, 55% of the world’s population lived in urban areas, a proportion that is expected to increase to 68% by 2050. In addition to complicating the performance of cities, this global increase in urbanization has made competition between cities a joint effort to obtain resources from the private and public sectors at the national and global levels. This has put the world’s cities in a competitive trend in the economic field and in the social, cultural, political, and environmental fields. As a result, the cities of each country are always striving to find a superior position over other competitors due to the national and transnational roles. This is because, in today’s world, the condition for success is the optimal use of opportunities, potentials, and confrontation with leading challenges and limitations. Accordingly, in recent decades, new approaches, such as competitiveness and futures studies, have received serious attention in analyzing urban and regional issues. Globally, several studies have tried to assess the level of competitiveness of cities, and different criteria and measurement variables have been used for this purpose [
4,
5,
6,
7,
8,
9,
10,
11].
However, the application of these indices in urban competitiveness studies is related to the last three decades, and so far, no definition of universality has been provided for it. Various studies have placed the greatest emphasis on the economic dimension of urban competitiveness. Still, recent studies, and especially since 1999, have considered multiple aspects of competitiveness in terms of the social, cultural, environmental, and scientific–technological. However, still, the complex nature of urban competitiveness needs to provide more complete definitions and pay attention to more critical aspects in these definitions. One of these cases that has been neglected in all foreign and domestic studies is the security dimension of urban competitiveness, which can be called the basis of other dimensions of competitiveness. They defined the competitiveness of cities as a competitive city: it is a city that has a competitive economic, environmental, cultural, social, and security advantage in the national geographical space, compared to other competitors (other cities).
Kermanshah city, the administrative, political, and economic center of Kermanshah province, had a population of 946,651 in 2016. Kermanshah is the second largest and most populous city in the west and northwest of Iran (after the city of Tabriz). It is ninth among the cities of Iran in terms of population. This city, as one of the cities of Iran, has natural and human capabilities, including being located on the side of the regional communication highway (east and west corridors); being a suitable distance from economic poles in Iran; establishing a transnational role in the land management document; being located in the main transit route to Iraq (adjacent to two Sulaimaniyah and Diyala provinces in Iraq); having unique natural, cultural, and historical tourist attractions; and having relatively favorable water resources (with a rainfall average of 439 mm per year and being the second largest rainfall after the city of Rasht, with a population of more than 500 thousand people)
. They will precede a wide range of possible futures in terms of urban competitiveness. However, despite these capabilities, it ranks first place in Iran in terms of unemployment rate, with 15.7%
. The average unemployment rate in Iran in 2014 was 10.6%. Furthermore, the number of employees in the industrial sector is only 23.01%, which is 4.41% and 5.34% lower, respectively, compared to the national average of 27.42% and that of the neighboring city (Hamedan), which is 28.35%. The number of libraries in Kermanshah (as an index of socio-cultural competitiveness) is 0.19 libraries per 10,000 population, which is, respectively, 3-, 10-, and 7-times less compared to the average of cities with a population of more than 500,000 with 0.56 libraries, as well as the cities of Hamedan (1.86) and Mashhad (1.33), which have the highest number of libraries [
12]. Spatial manifestations of these differences can be found in problems such as suburbanization and informal settlement (10 suburban neighborhoods), irregular urban hierarchy (first urban), migration, environmental issues (dust), low social capital and unfavorable urban governance, closure of more than 40% of small and large industrial units, and the destruction of natural and human opportunities [
13,
14].
Different economic, social, security, and environmental factors each contribute to the competitiveness of cities. If the comparative advantage of cities in competitiveness remains unknown, the urban development program will not proceed in the main direction, and investments will be low in practice. In addition, the continuation of this trend will increase regional inequalities in the national space and deprive cities of opportunities and competitiveness in the transnational dimension. Urban competitiveness has different dimensions, and these dimensions affect each other. This study aims to identify these dimensions, identify their impact on each other, and finally identify and analyze the key driving variables affecting urban competitiveness in Kermanshah.
3. Theoretical Foundations of Research
Urban competitiveness has become an influential new research agenda [
25], and researchers in urban economics, urban planning, and urban geography have researched it. On the other hand, the achievement of policies to promote cooperation between cities has attracted the attention of many researchers. This is because the cooperation of cities is significant for sustainable urban development [
26].
The complex and multidimensional nature of urban competitiveness, which globalization has put in focus [
27] by various researchers, including [
6,
28,
29,
30,
31,
32,
33], has received serious attention.
The concept of competitiveness accepted in cities in scientific studies of recent years has focused more on the sense of territorial competition (regional and urban). It has spread to regional and urban political discourses. Several international organizations have defined the term competitiveness according to the territory. On the one hand, they agree on at least equating this competition with the physical and real environment, and on the other hand, achieving productivity. Thus, they know it is necessary to achieve a higher performance in natural resources, labor, and capital [
7].
The main question and challenge in competitiveness studies are determining the dimensions and indices of urban competitiveness. In general, it is concluded from urban competitiveness research that the factors affecting urban competitiveness are not a factor but a set of factors and interactions between them [
34], which then examines its importance and various dimensions; a summary of the definitions of urban competitiveness and the most critical points of each definition are presented in
Table 2.
The authors of [
36] have investigated the approach of measuring base power to determine the competitiveness of macro-economies. Their purpose was to assess the competitiveness of countries. Therefore, they first analyzed the level of the relative competitiveness of countries using explanatory variables. Then, using sensitivity analysis, they showed how pre-designed changes, with the changes that occur, can overshadow some of the features of a country’s overall competitiveness index. The general regression equation has been used to predict the WCI index as well as the correlation coefficients between the variables. In this study, they have identified seven criteria as the main indices of a country’s competitiveness: 1, Demographic structure (nine characteristics); 2, Health (four characteristics); 3, Education (eight characteristics); 4, Environmental conditions (six characteristics); 5, Technology and infrastructure (nine characteristics); 6, Economy (11 characteristics); 7, Military power (14 characteristics). Countries are divided into four groups (highly competitive countries, competitive countries, non-competitive countries, and highly non-competitive countries) according to the WCI. This research aims to provide essential policy recommendations at the national level for developing and developed countries and multinational organizations. These recommendations can be used to re-evaluate changes in a country’s competitiveness and evaluate the competitiveness of countries not ranked according to the WCI.
In another study [
37], a national competitiveness index for measuring the Brunei economic environment was presented. The proposed index is based on collected hard data and surveyed soft data from four groups: 1, Economic performance; 2, Technology development; 3, Human resources; 4, Management capabilities. Based on the National Competitiveness Index, Brunei has performed relatively well in both the economic environment and human resources groups, but it has not performed very well in the technology development and management capabilities groups.
Other research [
38] studied the regional competitiveness index to improve the future forecast of the two regions of Western Europe. This study conducted 133 interviews with three types of regional experts (academics, local index makers, and organizations). The three objectives of this study were (1) to provide a critical view of the concept of regional competitive advantage: different meanings that can be given to this concept, factors affecting the success of the region, and the role of each of them as drivers of regional competition; (2) problems related to measurement and mental limitations of the term regional competitiveness; (3) given these issues, to what extent and in what method and policy can the efficiency of regional competitiveness be improved. The research results show that, unlike countries, cities, and regions that compete for goods and factors of production, international markets compete based on an absolute advantage rather than a comparative advantage. Furthermore, suppose the concept of regional competitiveness has meaning and value. In that case, it is a very complex and rich concept, and especially regional competitiveness is a problematic and confusing concept.
Another study [
39] has examined the concepts, factors, and models of urban competitiveness. Its goal was to provide a model of urban competitiveness that reflects the formation of competition in urban activities and the presentation of key factors and small and large environmental elements in contemporary cities. It concluded that competitiveness is a multidimensional concept, which will be defined depending on the purpose of the research. The concept of competitiveness can be generalized to different sections of society at the micro- and macro-levels. The territory of each city and its sphere of influence (global, national, or regional), in which it has an advantage (expertise), compete with other territories. Competition is only possible in cities with a similar performance, size, and status. According to the analysis of scientific literature, urban competition is the ability of an urban population to maintain a competitive position in a particular area (market) and compete among other similar cities with the same goal of conserving resources and improving citizens’ health through foreign and domestic management. Factors of urban competitiveness can be classified into two groups: (1) Key factors of the foreign environment, effectiveness, maintenance, and improvement of urban competitiveness (including five subgroups of general elements: political–legal, economic, socio-cultural, technological, and environment); (2) key factors of the domestic environment, a prerequisite for improving competitiveness in the city (including four groups of main factors: human, institutional, physical, and economic).
Another study [
23] evaluated the urban competitiveness index of Lithuanian cities based on three groups of economic, social, and environmental indices. In their study, the economic index was divided into two categories of economic performance and capacity growth of the urban economy. Researchers have divided the social competitiveness index into subgroups such as human resources and the education system, social welfare, living conditions, and productivity in the public sector. However, the environmental index is expressed only as the quality of the environment in this structure, and they have concluded that the concepts of urban, regional, and national competitiveness are closely related, and tools, methods, and analysis perspectives of concepts of regional and national competitiveness can also be used to describe and analyze urban competitiveness. Various competitiveness factors can describe urban competitiveness. This justifies the effect of the factor selection technique on the results of the competitiveness measurement. According to empirical research, the most competitive cities in Lithuania in 2006–2009 were Vilnius (capital), Kaunas (city of universities and industries), Klaipeda (port city), Palanga, and Druskininkai (tourist cities). Lithuania’s least competitive cities were Akmene, Taurage, Ukmerge, and Svencionys. Their analysis has shown that the geographical location of cities has little effect on urban competitiveness.
Another study [
4] measured the competitiveness of 253 Chinese cities in 2000 based on economic, social, and environmental criteria. They used a four-level hierarchical index system to calculate the urban competitiveness index. They showed that the top 20 cities, with a large share of the competitiveness indices, are generally located in eastern China, with a population greater than half a million people. In comparison, the bottom 20 cities are located mainly in the west of the country and have a population of between 200,000 and half a million people.
Another study [
7] assessed the competitiveness of 159 cities in 26 EU countries based on the Combined Urban Competitiveness Index (UCI), which includes a variety of sub-indices. In this study, competitiveness was examined in three dimensions: basic, efficiency, and innovation. These dimensions are composed of different levels of competitiveness, and the factors that constitute the input and output of competitiveness vary according to their level of economic development. They have shown that London and Paris are competitive at the highest level of economic development. The major countries with the highest level of competitiveness are in northern and central Europe, including cities in Denmark, Sweden, Finland, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany.
Another study [
40] studied the sustainability and competitiveness of 18 cities with a population of over 100,000 in Australia. This study examined the three variables of employment, population, and income by analyzing annual reports. The results of this study, while confirming the relationship between environmental sustainability and urban competitiveness, indicated that at the time of the study, the relationship between sustainability and competitiveness in Australia was not appropriate, and urban growth was associated with many environmental costs. Solving this problem requires discovering new opportunities that will be brought about by the approach and practice of smart city growth planners.
Another study [
8], at the regional level, studied the competitiveness of the metropolitan areas of 93 NUTS3 regions from four Eastern and Central European countries (Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia) in the Visegrad sections using the principal component analysis method and experimental databases. According to the competitiveness indices, this study concluded that urban areas are in a leading position. The cities of the capital are particularly characterized by strong competition. There is a moderate correlation between population size and the competitiveness index, as the urban areas of the four countries are widely dispersed based on competitiveness indices, while non-urban areas are less dispersed. Regarding the competition index of materials production, the producing countries of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Hungary have also increased in the type of production. Areas with strong competition are located in the western parts of these areas, while non-competitive areas are more in the eastern and northern parts.
5. Analysis and Discussion
Findings indicated that out of a total of 54 variables affecting the competitiveness of Kermanshah, 11 variables were in this group, which were the role of Kermanshah city in the power structure (MIN1); Geographical and strategic location (MIN4); National, regional, and local plans (MIN5); Management (MIN6); Clean and healthy air (ENV1); Potential sources of soil and water (ENV2); Security of space (SEC2); the agricultural sector (ECO7); Domestic tourism (ECO16); Foreign tourism (ECO17); Sustainable sources of income (ECO19). The importance of each of these factors is:
Management: together with specialized and integrated management, it is one of the key driving variables of economic, cultural, social, environmental, and security competitiveness in Kermanshah (
Figure 5 and
Figure 6). As seen, integrated and specialized management affects the role of Kermanshah in the structure of power, domestic security, and attracting domestic investors. Instability in urban management of Kermanshah is one of the factors that has faced the efficiency of management with major challenges, such as delays in the implementation of projects, suburbanization, and change of use of agricultural lands [
42]. For example, the city of Kermanshah had 10 mayors and heads of municipalities from 2006 to 2016. This constant change of mayors and the application of different tastes will lead to issues such as unfinished and changing the nature of urban projects, some of which will include socio-cultural projects. Considering the current management trend in Kermanshah, the results of which can be seen in the competitiveness of Kermanshah in economic, cultural, social, environmental, and security dimensions, three possible situations for the future of Kermanshah city management, as a key driving variable of competitiveness, are conceivable. In the most desirable case, management will move towards specialization and being program-oriented. In the middle case, management will proceed with the current trend with the current position of competitiveness. Furthermore, in the third and most unfavorable case, management will be inefficient and anti-development.
Clean and healthy air: Considering that one of the most important factors of environmental competitiveness is the amount of clean and healthy air during a year, this factor can be considered as one of the most crucial driving variables of environmental competitiveness in Kermanshah. Clean and healthy air will guarantee citizens’ health and attract domestic and foreign tourism, which will improve the economic and cultural–social competitiveness of Kermanshah. For the transnational issues regarding the dust crisis, in general, three situations can be predicted for the amount of clean and healthy air in Kermanshah in the future. In the best case, with the management of the dust crisis and traffic control and the use of public transportation, including the Kermanshah monorail, the number of clean and healthy air days in Kermanshah will increase. In the second case, the current trend will continue, and the number of days of bad and unhealthy air will increase day by day. In the worst scenario, there will be a crisis of bad and unhealthy air, and among its consequences will be the spread of diseases and forced migrations.
Soil and water sources: Kermanshah, with an average rainfall of 439 mm per year and 164,634 hectares of forests, rangelands, and good desert phenomena, is in a much more favorable situation than other cities with a population of more than 500,000.
Given the severe water crisis in Iran, the stability of water resources, population growth, and insufficient attention to water resources management [
43], soil and water sources are one of the factors affecting the level of competitiveness of places (especially in the future). According to the distribution map of water resources, part of Kermanshah province is in a good condition, and the other part is under water stress
. This opportunity can be fully exploited first for the city of Kermanshah and the whole province of Kermanshah and then for the neighboring provinces and other provinces facing water shortage crises with proper management, planning, and formulation of optimal normative scenarios. Therefore, the three possible situations of Kermanshah’s soil and water resources to make Kermanshah competitive are as follows: In the first case, the optimal and planned use of soil and soil resources in Kermanshah will be executed, and this opportunity will be used to improve the position and competitiveness of Kermanshah. In the second case, with little exploitation, the current situation will continue, or in the third case, there will be a water and soil resources crisis.
Life’s security (feeling of security): Space security and feeling of security are two basic factors to improve the competitiveness of Kermanshah, because it has direct and indirect effects on other competitive variables. For example, a high feeling of security can be a key driving variable for attracting domestic and foreign tourism and attracting domestic and foreign investors. On the other hand, security itself depends on the socio-cultural and economic variables of competitiveness. One of the Kermanshah vision document goals is to establish and achieve social security. According to these cases, there are three possible futures for Kermanshah competitiveness for the factor of life security (feeling of security). In the most desirable case, the feeling of security and the mental and objective image of domestic and foreign tourists and investors towards the security of life in Kermanshah increases. The status quo will continue in the second situation, and a sense of relative security will remain. In the third case, the insecurity of life will be established objectively and mentally for individuals.
Agriculture sector: Kermanshah has four climates, including cold winters and dry summers, semi-arid and cool steppe climates, semi-arid and warm steppe climates, and mild winters and hot and dry summers. The Zagros Mountains are located in this province. The average height of mountainous areas is 2000–3000 m, and in some areas, peaks above 3000 m can be seen. The difference in height between the highest and lowest point of the province is more than 3270 m, and the lowest point of the province is Somar, at 270 m above sea level. Of the province’s total area, an area equivalent to 753,900 hectares is allocated to plain lands. Most of these plains play a major role in the production of agricultural products and the province’s economy in terms of integrity, size, and fertility. Kermanshah metropolis, as the center of Kermanshah province, can play a role as a regional exchange center for agricultural products throughout Iran and even at the transnational level. Therefore, considering these potentials, three possible futures for the development of the Kermanshah agricultural sector, as a key driving variable affecting the competitiveness dimensions of Kermanshah, are conceivable. In the most favorable case, the agricultural sector’s potential has been maximally exploited, and Kermanshah will play a role as an exporter hub of agricultural products. In the second case, if the current situation continues, Kermanshah will have a limited boom in agricultural development. Furthermore, in the most unfavorable case, which is the third case, in the metropolis of Kermanshah, not only the opportunities of the agricultural sector will not be exploited, but also food security in Kermanshah will face a major challenge and require the import of various agricultural products.
Natural and human tourism capacities (domestic and foreign): Tourism is very important in the development and sustainability of countries [
44,
45], and through job creation, it improves economic development [
46]. Kermanshah province, in general, and Kermanshah city, in particular, have provided the possibility that Kermanshah city has the potential to become one of the national and regional tourism hubs.
The geographical location of Kermanshah has provided many opportunities in the field of tourism so that it has a strategic role in communication in the west of Iran. In addition to being a centralized city at the provincial level, it is also centralized at the regional level. The Karbala Highway, which connects Iran to Iraq through the Khosravi border, passes through the city of Kermanshah and has strengthened its service and commercial role. In Kermanshah province, 3600 historical monuments have been identified so far, of which 1936 monuments have been registered on the list of national monuments, and the Bistoon historical collection has been registered on the list of world monuments. In addition, 100 monuments have been identified as monuments that can be registered on the list of national natural monuments of Iran. Out of this number, 40 monuments have been registered nationally, which is a significant number, because 80 natural monuments have been registered nationally in Iran so far [
47]. Considering the effects of tourism on different dimensions of competitiveness, especially in economic and cultural–social dimensions, is considered a key driving variable of Kermanshah’s competitiveness.
Given the above, it seems that three situations are possible for the province in the future. In the first case, the development of tourism will continue at the current pace. In the second case, with expert management, the process of gradual development of domestic and foreign tourism will be accelerated and cause its development and prosperity. Alternatively, in the most unfavorable case, ignoring the tourism capacities will provide grounds for stagnation and destruction of tourism opportunities.
Sustainable sources of income
: Kermanshah’s geographical location and natural and human characteristics have provided many opportunities for Kermanshah to use sustainable income sources. Having the border with Iraq and having domestic and foreign tourist attractions are among these opportunities. Furthermore, among the visionary goals of Kermanshah province, emphasizing the role of Kermanshah city is the “Establishment of international medical and academic centers” to attract medical and academic tourism of neighboring countries and organize historical, natural, cultural, and religious tourism chains, along with economic and commercial prosperity, in such way that provides adequate demand and need for appropriate and superior welfare-accommodation services in the region [
48]. These cases have provided the grounds for the use of sustainable sources of income for Kermanshah, the extent of which is used as a driving force affecting the competitiveness of Kermanshah with three possible situations in the future. The first possibility will be the maximum and planned use of sustainable income sources, which will positively affect the competitiveness of Kermanshah. The second possibility is the continuation of the current trend and indifference to the use of sustainable income sources. The third possibility, and the most unfavorable case, will be the destruction of sustainable sources of income, which will weaken Kermanshah’s competitive position.
The role of Kermanshah in the power structure: Considering the influence of political powers and officials in the development of cities and the direction of decisions, especially at the national levels, the greater the national power structure of cities, especially metropolises, the more effective it will be in various dimensions of competitiveness, especially economic competitiveness. The city of Kermanshah does not have a strong role in the current situation of the national power structure, and if this trend continues, its status and competitiveness will worsen day by day, but if its role in the national power structure becomes more prominent, its effects on urban competitiveness will increase.
The geographical and strategic location of Kermanshah: Kermanshah has long been of extraordinary importance and value in terms of communication; as two important and famous roads (Royal Road) and (Silk Road) have passed through it, and after Islam, the famous road from Baghdad to Khorasan, which is known as the Great Road of Khorasan, has passed through Kermanshah. Kermanshah region has been known as the gateway to Asia [
49]. The geographical location and human characteristics of Kermanshah province have provided countless opportunities and capabilities for all-around competitiveness in the Kermanshah metropolis. The type of management and human actions can turn these opportunities into serious threats to destroy the opportunities of Kermanshah, which will affect other provinces as well.
Plans and programs: Developing a plan and program in accordance with the natural and human characteristics of Kermanshah while converging and orienting to spatial, social, and economic development programs and providing a roadmap for success in all Kermanshah development programs helps to achieve the desired competitive position of Kermanshah (according to natural and human potentials) and to play a role as a regional center in the west of Iran for the realization of legal and upstream documents, especially the goals of Iran’s 1404 Vision Document. In addition, it will reduce the intensity of centralization in planning and policy-making by identifying Kermanshah’s competitiveness capabilities and, on a national scale, modifying the role of the national metropolis of Tehran and reducing regional inequalities. Developing a program to improve the competitiveness of Kermanshah in the long vision in various dimensions of competitiveness (economic, social, environmental, and security) will enhance the competitiveness of Kermanshah; otherwise, it will burn opportunities and degrade its current competitiveness.
6. Conclusions
With the development of the city and urbanization and the more complex urban issues, efforts and research for economic, environmental, cultural–social, and security competitiveness of the city are necessary for the sustainability of cities. Assessing the index of economic, environmental, cultural, socio-social, and security competitiveness in cities, which is done using its specific criteria, is not only a quantitative study related to assessing and measuring economic, environmental, socio-cultural, and security criteria or determining the competitive position of cities in these dimensions. Rather, it is a continuous need and trend to recognize and use urban competitiveness’s economic, environmental, cultural, social, and security capacities to play a transnational role and develop and balance in the national and regional space.
The explanation of scientific literature showed that different factors should explain urban competitiveness, and one or more indices cannot fully define it. Therefore, it is necessary to measure different dimensions of competitiveness. Previous research and current research have proven that competitiveness measurement with different indices helps to solve the problem of measuring the complexities of urban competitiveness. Economic competitiveness is considered the basis and main dimension in urban, regional, national, and international competitiveness studies. However, because many factors affect the competitiveness of places and especially economic competitiveness, therefore, in addition to the economic dimension of competitiveness, it is necessary to pay special attention to other dimensions of urban competitiveness, including environmental, cultural, social, security, political, technological, etc.
After the 1990s, when Michael Porter introduced a different definition of competitiveness and introduced it from the enterprise level to the level of places (country, regions, and cities), despite the opposition of thinkers such as Krugman, the attention of many theorists and planners in urban economics, especially planners regional and urban development, were drawn to other dimensions of competitiveness. In the present study, by acknowledging the theoretical framework and methodology of the research, along with the various dimensions of competitiveness, the security dimension was introduced as a missing link in urban competitiveness studies. By defining variables to measure cities’ security competitiveness, the effects of the competitive advantage of security on other dimensions of competitiveness, especially economic competitiveness, are explained in
Figure 7.
Given the nature of urban competitiveness, which is multidimensional, it is necessary to avoid one-directional behavior in urban competitiveness planning and to pay attention to the social, cultural, environmental, and security dimensions of urban competitiveness in an integrated manner. In addition, since local futures form national and global futures, in a transnational dimension to compete with other competitors, the position and role of each city must be determined by its relative capacity. This is because improving the level of competitiveness of each city will eventually lead to improving the regional competitiveness of Iran (which is one of the goals of the vision document) as well as global competitiveness.
A total of 11 key factors will be the main actors of Kermanshah’s future competitiveness, some of which in upstream documents have also been considered, including (the Islamic Republic of Iran Vision Document, Kermanshah Development Vision Document, National Development Document of Kermanshah Province, and Basic Development Theory of Kermanshah Province). However, the parallel works done in these projects on the one hand and the weak implementation process on the other hand, and also the unfavorable flexibility of these projects in the case of Kermanshah (including the removal of Kermanshah from the list of metropolises with a population of one million people), has made these plans ineffective.
The final model of Kermanshah’s future competitiveness will be that in the first stage, if the government (administration and government structure), in the form of national, regional, and local programs, pays attention to the competitive advantages of places, especially large cities and eliminating regional inequalities. Furthermore, in the next stage, local government (officials, managers, and all planners as the executive department) will need to act in order to operationalize the competitiveness of Kermanshah. With the correct use of opportunities and potentials (economic, socio-cultural, environmental, and security), in the 20-year horizon, Kermanshah, will be a city with national and even transnational competitiveness. Otherwise, in addition to burning opportunities and destroying the capabilities of Kermanshah, other places adjacent to Kermanshah province will gradually be involved in challenges, tensions, and economic, cultural, social, environmental, security, and other crises
Figure 8.
These topics suggest to researchers that research on tourism competitiveness, comparing competitiveness between cities at the national and international level, and regional competitiveness is essential.