Next Article in Journal
Chemical Recycling of a Textile Blend from Polyester and Viscose, Part II: Mechanism and Reactivity during Alkaline Hydrolysis of Textile Polyester
Previous Article in Journal
The Lure and Limits of Smart Cars: Visual Analysis of Gender and Diversity in Car Branding
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Seed Mucilage Promotes Dispersal of Plantago asiatica Seeds by Facilitating Attachment to Shoes

Laboratory of Plant Ecology, Department of Agro-Environmental Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Inadacho, Obihiro 080-8555, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(11), 6909; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116909
Submission received: 11 May 2022 / Revised: 3 June 2022 / Accepted: 4 June 2022 / Published: 6 June 2022

Abstract

:
Understanding the mechanisms underlying seed dispersal is a fundamental issue in plant ecology and vegetation management. Several species demonstrate myxospermy, a phenomenon where the seeds form mucilage after absorbing water. Mucilage is thought to act as a glue, enabling seeds to attach to the external surfaces of dispersing agents. However, there have been no quantitative investigations of the efficacy of this function of seed mucilage. We performed a trampling and walking experiment to investigate the seed dispersal of a perennial herb, Asian plantain (Plantago asiatica L.), which forms polysaccharide mucilage upon hydration. Our experiment showed that: (1) after trampling, more seeds of P. asiatica attached to shoes in wet conditions (after rainfall), in which seed mucilage was created, than in dry conditions (no rainfall); and (2) after walking for 1000 m, more seeds remained attached to shoes in wet conditions than in dry conditions. Our results indicate that mucilage promotes the adherence of seeds to the surface of vectors. We therefore provide the first empirical evidence that seed mucilage facilitates epizoochory and human-mediated dispersal.

1. Introduction

The dispersal of fruits or seeds is a major determinant of plant distributions, abundances, and the structure of communities [1,2,3,4,5]. It plays a key role in gene flow within and among populations as well [6,7]. Additionally, seed dispersal is a central issue in vegetation management because it can promote the introduction of new species and weeds [4,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15]. It is also a major focus of studies on plant–animal interactions [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26].
Many plants that depend on animal dispersal are transported by specific dispersing agents, while others are be transported by a range of agents, including humans [1,16,27]. Humans are important agents of both intentional (e.g., introducing crops [28]) and unintentional dispersal (e.g., seeds becoming attached to clothing [12]); dispersal by humans is referred to as human-mediated dispersal [4,8,11,12,13,28,29,30,31]. Human-mediated dispersal can also be categorized as methods involving human vectors, such as the attachment of seeds to clothing [1,9,10,12,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37] or shoes [9,12,29,33,34,38,39], or those involving non-human vectors, such as vehicles [11,12,15,40,41], cargo [8], and livestock [42]. Although the significance of the role of human vectors has long been recognized [1,32,33,38,43,44,45], there is a paucity of quantitative evidence of dispersal by human vectors (e.g., [2,15,29,36,37]). Furthermore, despite the fact that the necessity of quantification of the dispersal distance is crucial in ecology to determine the distribution of species, there is, to date, little quantitative evidence of dispersal distance in relation to human vectors (e.g., [1,29,37]).
Plants that depend on animal dispersal have evolved various diaspore traits to in-crease dispersal [1,16,18,26,27,46,47,48,49,50,51,52], including polysaccharide mucilage. Diaspores of several species form polysaccharide mucilage after absorbing water, in a phenomenon called myxospermy (in the case of seeds [45,53,54,55,56,57,58]) or myxodiaspory (in relation to diaspores in general [55,56,59,60,61,62]). Mucilage can act as an adhesive in epizoochory (i.e., dispersal by attaching to the external surface of animals) [33,43,45,46,54,56,59,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there have been no studies that quantitatively analyze the efficacy of seed dispersal by adherence to dispersal agents due the formation of seed mucilage. Therefore, the present study aimed to evaluate whether and how seed mucilage facilitates seed dispersal, including determining whether its efficacy varies with the hydration level of seeds (wet or dry).
Seeds of several species from the genus Plantago produce mucilage upon hydration [45,53,56,57,58,61,62,64,68,70,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84]. The polysaccharide mucilage of the Plantago species is primarily composed of hemicelluloses, such as arabinoxylans, which are responsible for the adherent properties of the mucilage [72,79]. Asian plantain (P. asiatica L.) is a perennial rosette herb widely distributed in East Asia [85]. As has been recognized previously [86], the seeds of this particular species also produce mucilage (Figure 1). Empirical data of seed dispersal following attachment to human clothing or vehicles have been reported for Plantago spp. (e.g., P. asiatica L. [87], P. coronopus L. [8], P. depressa Willd. [15], P. lanceolata L. [8,38,88], and P. major L. [38]). However, to date, no studies have quantified the efficacy of seed mucilage that is formed after hydration regarding seed dispersal for any plant species. We hypothesized that dispersal with mucilage should be promoted under wet conditions. Specifically, we predicted that more seeds of P. asiatica would attach to shoes in wet conditions, due to mucilage formation, than in dry conditions.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

We conducted this study at Tamokuteki Hiroba in Midorigaoka Park (45°55′ N 143°11′ E, altitude: 49 m a.s.l.) in Obihiro City, Hokkaido, Japan, where P. asiatica is a common weed. The mean annual temperature and precipitation were 7.4 °C and 922 mm, respectively (2002–2021), according to the Obihiro Weather Station, which is located 2.6 km from the study site [89].

2.2. Walking Experiment

We performed walking experiments for 6 days between August and October 2021, when seeds were matured, following a modified protocol from a combination of previous studies [29,33,34,37]. The exact dates of the experiments are shown in the dataset provided in the Supplementary Materials. The selected walking lanes were located inside a flat and sandy sports ground, where most of the surface was bare. Some sparse, small-stature weeds (e.g., Polygonum aviculare L. subsp. aviculare) were present, but were avoided when selecting the walking lanes.
Each of the eight authors repeatedly performed the same experimental trials, each of which involved the following steps (Figure 2): (1) One small part of the Plantago stand was selected. (2) The author put on a pair of commercially available work shoes (DCM-Kakkusu shoes, sole length: 24.5 cm) with synthetic rubber soles. (3) The selected part of the stand was trampled by stepping on it 20 times. The trampled parts were labeled with colored tape so as not to be used again. (4) The shoes were carefully removed while ensuring that the seeds were not dropped. The author then carried the shoes to the starting point (hereafter called the “0 m point”) of one of the walking lanes. (5) The number of seeds attached to the shoes (including the soles and all the other part of the shoes) was counted; if none were found, the trial was stopped with the initial seed number recorded as zero. (6) The author put on the shoes again, started walking at a constant, normal speed, and stopped walking at each observational point (1, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1000 m from the starting point). The shoes were carefully removed and all the seeds attached to the shoes were counted. The location of each seed on each shoe, including the sole and the other part of the outer surface, was recorded using the map to avoid double-counting or miscounting. The walking lanes were straight and 50 m long. Observational points that were over 50 m from the start were achieved by making round trips (i.e., the 100 m point was reached by turning at the end of the 50 m walking lane and returning to the beginning). The trial ended when 1000 m was reached, even if seeds remained on the shoes.
Field conditions during each experimental trial were classified as wet or dry. “Wet” conditions were defined as rain having occurred on the previous day or early in the morning of the day of the experiment; otherwise, the condition was classified as “dry”. We could not rule out the possibility that some seeds may have become wet due to morning dew even on dry days. A total of 1171 seeds were examined during 162 trials in the experiment over the course of two dry and four wet days.

2.3. Data Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using R ver. 4.12 [90] with the packages cowplot [91], ggbeeswarm [92], and ggplot2 [93]. To test the hypothesis that more seeds attach to shoes in wet conditions due to mucilage formation, we compared the mean number of seeds attached to shoes after trampling the stands (i.e., before walking) in the two conditions (wet and dry), using a generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). This analysis was performed using the R function glmer [94], setting the field condition (either dry or wet) as the fixed effect. We used a Poisson distribution (family = poisson (link = “log”)) to predict positive and discrete dependent variables [95,96]. To test the second hypothesis, that seeds are more likely to remain attached for longer distances in wet conditions, we compared the fraction of seeds remaining after walking 1000 m using the logistic regression model of GLMM (family = binomial (link = “logit”)) [47]. Following the arguments by Barr et al. [97], all factors (person and date) were included as random slopes and random intercepts, whenever justified by the design. Applying only random intercepts (no random slopes) also provided highly significant results (p < 0.001). The dataset is available in the Supplementary Materials.

3. Results

Significantly more seeds attached to shoes after trampling P. asiatica stands under wet conditions, compared with those observed under dry conditions (p < 0.001). The median numbers of attached seeds after trampling but before walking were 8.5 and 2.0 in wet and dry conditions, respectively (Figure 3a). In dry conditions, we often found no seeds attached to the shoes during trials (recorded as zero in Figure 3a). Seeds were significantly more likely to remain on shoes after 1000 m of walking in wet conditions, compared with those observed in dry conditions (p < 0.001). The mean fractions of seeds remaining at the 1000 m observation point were 20.8% and 3.99% in wet and dry conditions, respectively (Figure 3b). These seeds remained intact (i.e., not crushed) on shoes after walking.

4. Discussion

4.1. Role of Diaspore Mucilage in Human-Mediated Dispersal

Human-mediated dispersal plays an important role in the dispersal of many plant species [4,8,9,11,13,15,30,32,35,36,37,41,45]. It is thought that seed mucilage facilitates seed dispersal [33,43,45,46,54,56,59,63,65,66,67,68,69,70,71], including human-mediated dispersal. Kreitschitz et al. [54,56,71] found that the seed polysaccharide mucilage of two congeneric species, P. ovata and P. lanceolata, acts as a glue, causing seeds to become sticky when wet and to remain strongly adhered to a glass surface even after drying out. Therefore, seed mucilage can be considered analogous to the polysaccharide glue used for postal stamps [81], which also becomes sticky upon hydration and subsequent drying. Schaber et al. [98] found a similar property for the seeds of other species. However, neither of these authors investigated how the mucilage actually facilitates seed dispersal, as their work was laboratory based. The results of the present study provide the first field-based quantitative evidence supporting the laboratory findings of Kreitschitz et al. [54,56,71] and Schaber et al. [98], showing that seed mucilage facilitates seed dispersal by acting as a glue that contributes to the adhesion of seeds to shoes.
The weed P. asiatica is common on and around footpaths in the Midorigaoka park. Our study demonstrated that P. asiatica seeds can be dispersed more than 1000 m by walkers. In the park, there are bus stops and parking lots within 1000 m of identified P. asiatica stands. It is thus possible that seeds are dispersed to greater distances by remaining attached to the shoes of visitors who use buses or other vehicles, as has been suggested for Brassica spp. [29]. Therefore, our findings highlight a possible route for the inflow and outflow of seeds into and out of the park.

4.2. Limitations of the Present Study

The present study has several limitations. First, seed mucilage has been suggested to play versatile roles beyond seed dispersal [58,68,78,99], which were not investigated in our experiment. Seed mucilage anchors seeds in the soil, allowing them to remain in a favorable location (a phenomenon called antitelochory) [56,62,65,68,69,71,83,100,101]. Seed mucilage also facilitates water absorption and retention to promote germination (especially in arid environments) [56,61,68,69,70,73,74,78,81,83,102,103] and to facilitate repairing of damaged DNA [102]. It also prevents or reduces herbivory by protecting seeds [60,68,78,83,104,105], provides lubrication inside the digestive tracts of animals, and protects seeds during endozoochory [61,68,78,83,106,107]. Furthermore, it promotes seed floating on water during hydrochory [65,68], facilitates seed development inside fruits [68], provides carbohydrate resources to soil microbes [58,108], and acts as a reward for dispersal agents [48]. Although these additional roles of mucilage are not mutually exclusive to our hypothesis that mucilage facilitates epizoochory, further studies are needed to evaluate the relative significance of the role of mucilage in seed dispersal in comparison to its other roles.
Second, our finding that P. asiatica seeds are dispersed by attachment to shoes does not preclude the existence of alternative dispersal mechanisms for this species. Several species from the genus Plantago are known to attach to a variety of vectors. For example, the seeds of P. major and P. lanceolata are dispersed by attaching to both clothing and vehicles [12,41,88]. The seeds of P. lanceolata are dispersed by attaching to animals and being contained in dung [88]. The seeds of P. lagopus are dispersed by attaching to sheep fleece [42], and the seeds of P. depressa attach to vehicles [15]. Hence, it is likely that the seeds of P. asiatica also attach to non-human vectors. Therefore, future studies should evaluate the relative contribution of other non-human vectors.
Third, the present results are based on limited experimental conditions; the adherence property of mucilage depends on the materials of the surface of clothing [30,31,34] and, probably, on soil properties. Furthermore, we investigated only one species; patterns of seed retention on clothing also depend on seed traits, such as the type of adhesive structure of each species, which can include mucilages, sticky spines, and hairs [30,37]. Therefore, further studies are warranted to explore the potential dispersal of additional species with different seed traits under various field conditions, in order to make broader inferences.

5. Conclusions

Plantago asiatica seeds produce mucilage when they absorb water. Seeds are more likely to attach to the shoes of walkers who step on P. asiatica stands in wet conditions (after rainfall) than in dry conditions. The seeds are also more likely to remain on shoes when they attach during wet conditions, as compared to dry conditions. Our study provides the first empirical evidence that seed mucilage facilitates epizoochory and human-mediated dispersal. However, because the present dataset is limited to one species in one particular field, further studies that cover a wide range of species and field conditions are needed in order to draw generalizations from our results.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/su14116909/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.A.; methodology, N.A. and K.K. (Kohei Koyama); formal analysis, N.A. and K.K. (Kohei Koyama); investigation, N.A., K.K. (Kohei Koyama)., A.O., K.K. (Kowa Katayama), N.M., S.O., Y.T. and Y.K.; data curation, N.A. and K.K. (Kohei Koyama); writing, N.A. and K.K. (Kohei Koyama). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the JSPS KAKENHI 18K06406 and 19H02987.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data presented in this article are available in the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank staff members of the Obihiro City office for their permission of the fieldwork at the study site.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bullock, S.H.; Primack, R.B. Comparative experimental study of seed dispersal on animals. Ecology 1977, 58, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Carey, P.; Watkinson, A. The dispersal and fates of seeds of the winter annual grass Vulpia ciliata. J. Ecol. 1993, 81, 759–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bruun, H.H.; Poschlod, P. Why are small seeds dispersed through animal guts: Large numbers or seed size per se? Oikos 2006, 113, 402–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bullock, J.M.; Wichmann, M.C.; Hails, R.S.; Hodgson, D.J.; Alexander, M.J.; Morley, K.; Knopp, T.; Ridding, L.E.; Hooftman, D.A.P. Human-mediated dispersal and disturbance shape the metapopulation dynamics of a long-lived herb. Ecology 2020, 101, e03087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liu, Z.; Evans, M. Effect of tree density on seed production and dispersal of birch (Betula pendula Roth and Betula pubescens Ehrhs). Forests 2021, 12, 929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Martínez-López, V.; García, C.; Zapata, V.; Robledano, F.; De la Rúa, P. Intercontinental long-distance seed dispersal across the Mediterranean Basin explains population genetic structure of a bird-dispersed shrub. Mol. Ecol. 2020, 29, 1408–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Al-Qthanin, R.N.; Alharbi, S.A. Spatial structure and genetic variation of a mangrove species (Avicennia marina (Forssk.) Vierh) in the Farasan Archipelago. Forests 2020, 11, 1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Whinam, J.; Chilcott, N.; Bergstrom, D.M. Subantarctic hitchhikers: Expeditioners as vectors for the introduction of alien organisms. Biol. Conserv. 2005, 121, 207–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Scott, K.A. Potential for the dispersal of weed seeds on clothing: An example with Gamba Grass in northern Australia. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2009, 10, 71–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ansong, M.; Pickering, C. Long-distance dispersal of Black Spear Grass (Heteropogon contortus) seed on socks and trouser legs by walkers in Kakadu National Park. Ecol. Manag. Restor. 2013, 14, 71–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. von der Lippe, M.; Bullock, J.M.; Kowarik, I.; Knopp, T.; Wichmann, M. Human-Mediated Dispersal of Seeds by the Airflow of Vehicles. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e52733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pickering, C.; Ansong, M. Human-mediated dispersal of the seeds of Australian weeds. Victorian Nat. 2020, 137, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Runghen, R.; Bramon Mora, B.; Godoy-Lorite, A.; Stouffer, D.B. Assessing unintended human-mediated dispersal using visitation networks. J. Appl. Ecol. 2021, 58, 777–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wróbel, A.; Kurek, P.; Bogdziewicz, M.; Dobrowolska, D.; Zwolak, R. Avian dispersal of an invasive oak is modulated by acorn traits and the presence of a native oak. For. Ecol. Manag. 2022, 505, 119866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, M.; Pickering, C.M.; Xu, L.; Lin, X. Tourist vehicle as a selective mechanism for plant dispersal: Evidence from a national park in the eastern Himalaya. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 285, 112109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yoshikawa, T.; Masaki, T.; Motooka, M.; Hino, D.; Ueda, K. Highly toxic seeds of the Japanese star anise Illicium anisatum are dispersed by a seed-caching bird and a rodent. Ecol. Res. 2018, 33, 495–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tsuji, Y.; Campos-Arceiz, A.; Prasad, S.; Kitamura, S.; McConkey, K.R. Intraspecific differences in seed dispersal caused by differences in social rank and mediated by food availability. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Almazán-Núñez, R.C.; Alvarez-Alvarez, E.A.; Sierra-Morales, P.; Rodríguez-Godínez, R. Fruit Size and Structure of Zoochorous Trees: Identifying Drivers for the Foraging Preferences of Fruit-Eating Birds in a Mexican Successional Dry Forest. Animals 2021, 11, 3343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Almeida, A.P.; Gomes, M.; Rabaça, J.E.; Ramos, J.A. Songbirds promote connectivity between riparian galleries and adjacent habitats. Ecol. Res. 2021, 36, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Araki, N.; Hirayama, K. Differences in the fruit removal patterns of Cleyera japonica by frugivorous birds in two forest stands at different developmental stages in a warm-temperate region. Ecol. Res. 2021, 36, 189–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ben-Zvi, G.; Seifan, M.; Giladi, I. Ant guild identity determines seed fate at the post-removal seed dispersal stages of a desert perennial. Insects 2021, 12, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Blanco, G.; Romero-Vidal, P.; Carrete, M.; Chamorro, D.; Bravo, C.; Hiraldo, F.; Tella, J.L. Burrowing parrots Cyanoliseus patagonus as long-distance seed dispersers of keystone algarrobos, genus Prosopis, in the Monte Desert. Diversity 2021, 13, 204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Selås, V.; Framstad, E.; Rolstad, J.; Sonerud, G.A.; Spidsø, T.K.; Wegge, P. Bilberry seed production explains spatiotemporal synchronicity in bank vole population fluctuations in Norway. Ecol. Res. 2021, 36, 409–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tanaka, K.; Tokuda, M. Road preference of ants in a Japanese warm temperate forest and its implications for the regeneration of myrmecochorous sedges. Ecol. Res. 2021, 36, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Teixido, A.L.; Fuzessy, L.F.; Souza, C.S.; Gomes, I.N.; Kaminski, L.A.; Oliveira, P.C.; Maruyama, P.K. Anthropogenic impacts on plant-animal mutualisms: A global synthesis for pollination and seed dispersal. Biol. Conserv. 2022, 266, 109461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vazquez, M.S.; Rodriguez-Cabal, M.A.; Amico, G.C. The forest gardener: A marsupial with a key seed-dispersing role in the Patagonian temperate forest. Ecol. Res. 2022, 37, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Gómez, J.M.; Schupp, E.W.; Jordano, P. Synzoochory: The ecological and evolutionary relevance of a dual interaction. Biol. Rev. 2019, 94, 874–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wyatt, G.E.; Hamrick, J.L.; Trapnell, D.W. The role of anthropogenic dispersal in shaping the distribution and genetic composition of a widespread North American tree species. Ecol. Evol. 2021, 11, 11515–11532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wichmann, M.C.; Alexander, M.J.; Soons, M.B.; Galsworthy, S.; Dunne, L.; Gould, R.; Fairfax, C.; Niggemann, M.; Hails, R.S.; Bullock, J.M. Human-mediated dispersal of seeds over long distances. P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2009, 276, 523–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ansong, M.; Pickering, C. Weed seeds on clothing: A global review. J. Environ. Manag. 2014, 144, 203–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Ansong, M.; Pickering, C. The effects of seed traits and fabric type on the retention of seed on different types of clothing. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2016, 17, 516–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Healy, A.J. Seed dispersal by human activity. Nature 1943, 151, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Faliński, J. Anthropochory in xerothermic grasslands in the light of experimental data. Acta. Soc. Bot. Pol. 1972, 41, 357–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Mount, A.; Pickering, C.M. Testing the capacity of clothing to act as a vector for non-native seed in protected areas. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 91, 168–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Pickering, C.M.; Mount, A.; Wichmann, M.C.; Bullock, J.M. Estimating human-mediated dispersal of seeds within an Australian protected area. Biol. Invasions 2011, 13, 1869–1880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ansong, M.; Pickering, C. What’s a weed? Knowledge, attitude and behaviour of park visitors about weeds. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Ansong, M.; Pickering, C.; Arthur, J.M. Modelling seed retention curves for eight weed species on clothing. Austral. Ecol. 2015, 40, 765–774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Clifford, H.T. Seed dispersal on footwear. P. Bot. Soc. Brit. Isles 1956, 2, 129–131. [Google Scholar]
  39. Higashino, P.; Guyer, W.; Stone, C. The Kilauea wilderness marathon and crater rim runs: Sole searching experiences. Hawaii. Bot. Soc. 1983, 22, 25–28. [Google Scholar]
  40. Clifford, H.T. Seed Dispersal by Motor Vehicles. J. Ecol. 1959, 47, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Hodkinson, D.J.; Thompson, K. Plant dispersal: The role of man. J. Appl. Ecol. 1997, 34, 1484–1496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Manzano, P.; Malo, J.E. Extreme long-distance seed dispersal via sheep. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2006, 4, 244–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Woodruffe-Peacock, E.A. A Fox-Covert Study. J. Ecol. 1918, 6, 110–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Baiges, J.; Espadaler, X.; Blanché, C. Seed dispersal in W Mediterranean Euphorbia species. Bot. Chron. 1991, 10, 697–705. [Google Scholar]
  45. Grubert, M. Studies on the distribution of myxospermy among seeds and fruits of Angiospermae and its ecological importance. Acta Biol. Venez. 1974, 8, 315–352. [Google Scholar]
  46. van der Pijl, L. Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants, 3rd Revised and Expanded ed.; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  47. Alcántara, J.M.; Rey, P.J. Conflicting selection pressures on seed size: Evolutionary ecology of fruit size in a bird-dispersed tree, Olea europaea. J. Evol. Biol. 2003, 16, 1168–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Nunez, C.V.; de Oliveira, M.L.; Lima, R.D.; Diaz, I.E.C.; Sargentini, É.; Pereira, O.L.; Araújo, L.M. Chemical analyses confirm a rare case of seed dispersal by bees. Apidologie 2008, 39, 618–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Wallace, H.M.; Howell, M.G.; Lee, D.J. Standard yet unusual mechanisms of long-distance dispersal: Seed dispersal of Corymbia torelliana by bees. Divers. Distrib. 2008, 14, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Case, S.B.; Tarwater, C.E. Functional traits of avian frugivores have shifted following species extinction and introduction in the Hawaiian Islands. Funct. Ecol. 2020, 34, 2467–2476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Valenta, K.; Nevo, O. The dispersal syndrome hypothesis: How animals shaped fruit traits, and how they did not. Funct. Ecol. 2020, 34, 1158–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Koyama, K.; Tashiro, M. No effect of selective maturation on fruit traits for a bird-dispersed species, Sambucus racemosa. Plants 2021, 10, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Phan, J.L.; Tucker, M.R.; Khor, S.F.; Shirley, N.; Lahnstein, J.; Beahan, C.; Bacic, A.; Burton, R.A. Differences in glycosyltransferase family 61 accompany variation in seed coat mucilage composition in Plantago spp. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 6481–6495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Kreitschitz, A.; Kovalev, A.; Gorb, S.N. “Sticky invasion”—the physical properties of Plantago lanceolata L. seed mucilage. Beilstein. J. Nanotech. 2016, 7, 1918–1927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Kreitschitz, A.; Gorb, S.N. How does the cell wall ‘stick’ in the mucilage? A detailed microstructural analysis of the seed coat mucilaginous cell wall. Flora 2017, 229, 9–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Kreitschitz, A.; Kovalev, A.; Gorb, S.N. Plant seed mucilage as a glue: Adhesive properties of hydrated and dried-in-contact seed mucilage of five plant species. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Cowley, J.M.; Burton, R.A. The goo-d stuff: Plantago as a myxospermous model with modern utility. New Phytol. 2021, 229, 1917–1923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Viudes, S.; Burlat, V.; Dunand, C. Seed mucilage evolution: Diverse molecular mechanisms generate versatile ecological functions for particular environments. Plant Cell Environ. 2020, 43, 2857–2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ryding, O. Myxocarpy in the Nepetoideae (Lamiaceae) with notes on myxodiaspory in general. Syst. Geogr. Plants 2001, 71, 503–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. LoPresti, E.F.; Pan, V.; Goidell, J.; Weber, M.G.; Karban, R. Mucilage-bound sand reduces seed predation by ants but not by reducing apparency: A field test of 53 plant species. Ecology 2019, 100, e02809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Kreitschitz, A.; Haase, E.; Gorb, S.N. The role of mucilage envelope in the endozoochory of selected plant taxa. Sci. Nat. 2020, 108, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pan, V.S.; Girvin, C.; LoPresti, E.F. Anchorage by seed mucilage prevents seed dislodgement in high surface flow: A mechanistic investigation. Ann. Bot. 2022, mcac045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Carlquist, S. The biota of long-distance dispersal. V. Plant dispersal to Pacific Islands. B. Torrey Bot. Club 1967, 94, 129–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Swarbrick, J.T. External mucilage production by the seeds of British plants. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 1971, 64, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fahn, A.; Werker, E. Anatomical mechanisms of seed dispersal. In Seed Biology: Importance, Development, and Germination; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1972; Volume 1, pp. 151–221. [Google Scholar]
  66. Sorensen, A.E. Seed dispersal by adhesion. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 1986, 17, 443–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Norton, D.A.; Delange, P.J.; Garnock-Jones, P.J.; Given, D.R. The role of seabirds and seals in the survival of coastal plants: Lessons from New Zealand Lepidium (Brassicaceae). Biodivers. Conserv. 1997, 6, 765–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yang, X.; Baskin, J.M.; Baskin, C.C.; Huang, Z. More than just a coating: Ecological importance, taxonomic occurrence and phylogenetic relationships of seed coat mucilage. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2012, 14, 434–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kreitschitz, A.; Vallès, J. Achene morphology and slime structure in some taxa of Artemisia L. and Neopallasia L. (Asteraceae). Flora 2007, 202, 570–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Kreitschitz, A. Biological properties of fruit and seed slime envelope: How to live, fly, and not die. In Functional Surfaces in Biology: Little Structures with Big Effects Volume 1; Gorb, S.N., Ed.; Springer Netherlands: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2009; pp. 11–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Kreitschitz, A.; Kovalev, A.; Gorb, S.N. Slipping vs. sticking: Water-dependent adhesive and frictional properties of Linum usitatissimum L. seed mucilaginous envelope and its biological significance. Acta Biomater. 2015, 17, 152–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Dybka-Stępień, K.; Otlewska, A.; Góźdź, P.; Piotrowska, M. The renaissance of plant mucilage in health promotion and industrial applications: A review. Nutrients 2021, 13, 3354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Harper, J.L.; Benton, R.A. The behaviour of seeds in soil: II. The germination of seeds on the surface of a water supplying substrate. J. Ecol. 1966, 54, 151–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Young, J.A.; Evans, R.A. Mucilaginous seed coats. Weed Sci. 1973, 21, 52–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Tomoda, M.; Yokoi, M.; Ishikawa, K. Plant mucilages. XXIX. Isolation and characterization of a mucous polysaccharide, ‘Plantago-mucilage A’ from the seeds of Plantago major var. asiatica. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1981, 29, 2877–2884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Kulkarni, G.; Gowthamarajan, K.; Rao, B.; Suresh, B. Evaluation of binding properties of Plantago ovata and Trigonella foenum graecum mucilages. Indian Drugs 2002, 39, 422–425. [Google Scholar]
  77. Malviya, R.; Srivastava, P.; Kulkarni, G. Applications of mucilages in drug delivery-a review. Adv. Biol. Res. 2011, 5, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  78. Western, T.L. The sticky tale of seed coat mucilages: Production, genetics, and role in seed germination and dispersal. Seed Sci. Res. 2011, 22, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Yu, L.; Yakubov, G.E.; Zeng, W.; Xing, X.; Stenson, J.; Bulone, V.; Stokes, J.R. Multi-layer mucilage of Plantago ovata seeds: Rheological differences arise from variations in arabinoxylan side chains. Carbohyd. Polym. 2017, 165, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Ji, X.; Hou, C.; Guo, X. Physicochemical properties, structures, bioactivities and future prospective for polysaccharides from Plantago L. (Plantaginaceae): A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 135, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Mukherjee, T.; Lerma-Reyes, R.; Thompson, K.A.; Schrick, K. Making glue from seeds and gums: Working with plant-based polymers to introduce students to plant biochemistry. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Edu. 2019, 47, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Fierascu, R.C.; Fierascu, I.; Ortan, A.; Paunescu, A. Plantago media L.—Explored and potential applications of an underutilized plant. Plants 2021, 10, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Tsai, A.Y.-L.; McGee, R.; Dean, G.H.; Haughn, G.W.; Sawa, S. Seed Mucilage: Biological Functions and Potential Applications in Biotechnology. Plant Cell Physiol. 2021, 62, 1847–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Cowley, J.M.; O’Donovan, L.A.; Burton, R.A. The composition of Australian Plantago seeds highlights their potential as nutritionally-rich functional food ingredients. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 12692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility. Available online: http://www.gbif.org (accessed on 14 February 2022).
  86. Yin, J.-Y.; Chen, H.-H.; Lin, H.-X.; Xie, M.-Y.; Nie, S.-P. Structural features of alkaline extracted polysaccharide from the seeds of Plantago asiatica L. and its rheological properties. Molecules 2016, 21, 1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Yamashita, T.; Yoshida, M.; Ohnuna, S. Germinated plants from seeds carried by tourist’s shoes into Mt. Tateyama, Toyama Prefecture, Central Japan. Bull. Bot. Gard. Toyama 2008, 13, 15–21. [Google Scholar]
  88. Pickering, C.; Mount, A. Do tourists disperse weed seed? A global review of unintentional human-mediated terrestrial seed dispersal on clothing, vehicles and horses. J. Sustain. Tour. 2010, 18, 239–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Japan Meteorological Agency. Available online: https://www.jma.go.jp (accessed on 25 March 2022).
  90. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Satistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; R Core Team: Vienna, Austria, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  91. Wilke, C.O. cowplot: Streamlined plot theme and plot annotations for ‘ggplot2’. CRAN Repos 2016, 2, R2. [Google Scholar]
  92. Clarke, E.; Sherrill-Mix, S. ggbeeswarm: Categorical Scatter (Violin Point) Plots. 2017. Available online: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggbeeswarm/index.html (accessed on 17 January 2021).
  93. Wickham, H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  94. Bates, D.; Mächler, M.; Bolker, B.; Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 2015, 67, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Staab, M.; Pereira-Peixoto, M.H.; Klein, A.-M. Exotic garden plants partly substitute for native plants as resources for pollinators when native plants become seasonally scarce. Oecologia 2020, 194, 465–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Iwabe, R.; Koyama, K.; Komamura, R. Shade avoidance and light foraging of a clonal woody species, Pachysandra terminalis. Plants 2021, 10, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Barr, D.J.; Levy, R.; Scheepers, C.; Tily, H.J. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. J. Mem. Lan. 2013, 68, 255–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Schaber, C.F.; Kreitschitz, A.; Gorb, S.N. Friction-active surfaces based on free-standing anchored cellulose nanofibrils. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2018, 10, 37566–37574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. North, H.M.; Berger, A.; Saez-Aguayo, S.; Ralet, M.-C. Understanding polysaccharide production and properties using seed coat mutants: Future perspectives for the exploitation of natural variants. Ann. Bot. 2014, 114, 1251–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. García-Fayos, P.; Cerda, A. Seed losses by surface wash in degraded Mediterranean environments. Catena 1997, 29, 73–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. García-Fayos, P.; Bochet, E.; Cerdà, A. Seed removal susceptibility through soil erosion shapes vegetation composition. Plant Soil 2010, 334, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Huang, Z.; Boubriak, I.; Osborne, D.J.; Dong, M.; Gutterman, Y. Possible role of pectin-containing mucilage and dew in repairing embryo DNA of seeds adapted to desert conditions. Ann. Bot. 2008, 101, 277–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Kreitschitz, A.; Tadele, Z.; Gola, E.M. Slime cells on the surface of Eragrostis seeds maintain a level of moisture around the grain to enhance germination. Seed Sci. Res. 2009, 19, 27–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Huang, Z.; Yitzchak, G.; Zhenghai, H. Structure and function of mucilaginous achenes of Artemisia monosperma inhabiting the Negev desert of Israel. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2000, 48, 255–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Pan, V.S.; McMunn, M.; Karban, R.; Goidell, J.; Weber, M.G.; LoPresti, E.F. Mucilage binding to ground protects seeds of many plants from harvester ants: A functional investigation. Funct. Ecol. 2021, 35, 2448–2460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Vazačová, K.; Münzbergová, Z. Simulation of seed digestion by birds: How does it reflect the real passage through a pigeon’s gut? Folia Geobot. 2013, 48, 257–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Lee, K.; Kreitschitz, A.; Lee, J.; Gorb, S.N.; Lee, H. Localization of phenolic compounds at an air–solid interface in plant seed mucilage: A strategy to maximize its biological function? ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. 2020, 12, 42531–42536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Yang, X.; Baskin, C.C.; Baskin, J.M.; Zhang, W.; Huang, Z. Degradation of seed mucilage by soil microflora promotes early seedling growth of a desert sand dune plant. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35, 872–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Photographs of seeds of Asian plantain (Plantago asiatica L.) before and after hydration. (a) Pyxises (fruits); seeds can be seen inside the bell-shaped husks. (b) A seed before hydration. The length of each seed was usually 1–2 mm. (c) A seed after hydration. Mucilage can be seen, having formed around the surface of the seed. Photographs were taken in 2021 by Nanako Abe. The original high-resolution images are available as Supplementary Materials.
Figure 1. Photographs of seeds of Asian plantain (Plantago asiatica L.) before and after hydration. (a) Pyxises (fruits); seeds can be seen inside the bell-shaped husks. (b) A seed before hydration. The length of each seed was usually 1–2 mm. (c) A seed after hydration. Mucilage can be seen, having formed around the surface of the seed. Photographs were taken in 2021 by Nanako Abe. The original high-resolution images are available as Supplementary Materials.
Sustainability 14 06909 g001
Figure 2. (a) The walking experiment of seed dispersal performed in 2021. (b) The work shoe used in the experiment. (c) Seeds of Asian plantain (Plantago asiatica L.) attached to the sole of the shoe. A red, bell-shaped husk was also attached, adjacent to the seed on the right. The photographs were taken in 2021 by Kohei Koyama.
Figure 2. (a) The walking experiment of seed dispersal performed in 2021. (b) The work shoe used in the experiment. (c) Seeds of Asian plantain (Plantago asiatica L.) attached to the sole of the shoe. A red, bell-shaped husk was also attached, adjacent to the seed on the right. The photographs were taken in 2021 by Kohei Koyama.
Sustainability 14 06909 g002
Figure 3. Adhesion of the seeds of Asian plantain (Plantago asiatica L.) to shoes in different field conditions (wet vs. dry). (a) Initial number of seeds attached to a pair of shoes after trampling P. asiatica stands for 20 steps, just prior to each of the walking trials. The closed black circles indicate the results of one trial. This analysis includes cases where no seed attachment to shoes after trampling was observed, which was recorded as zero. Significantly more seeds attached under wet conditions (after rainfall) than dry conditions (no rainfall) (Poisson GLMM: p < 0.001). (b) Fraction of seeds (i.e., the total number of seeds at each distance divided by the total number of seeds at the 0 m point) remaining after walking for a given distance. Data from all trials were pooled separately for each condition (wet or dry), and trials where no seeds attached to the shoes after trampling were excluded. The seeds were significantly more likely to remain on shoes after the 1000 m walking experiment under wet conditions than under dry conditions (logistic GLMM: p < 0.001). The dataset is available in the Supplementary Materials.
Figure 3. Adhesion of the seeds of Asian plantain (Plantago asiatica L.) to shoes in different field conditions (wet vs. dry). (a) Initial number of seeds attached to a pair of shoes after trampling P. asiatica stands for 20 steps, just prior to each of the walking trials. The closed black circles indicate the results of one trial. This analysis includes cases where no seed attachment to shoes after trampling was observed, which was recorded as zero. Significantly more seeds attached under wet conditions (after rainfall) than dry conditions (no rainfall) (Poisson GLMM: p < 0.001). (b) Fraction of seeds (i.e., the total number of seeds at each distance divided by the total number of seeds at the 0 m point) remaining after walking for a given distance. Data from all trials were pooled separately for each condition (wet or dry), and trials where no seeds attached to the shoes after trampling were excluded. The seeds were significantly more likely to remain on shoes after the 1000 m walking experiment under wet conditions than under dry conditions (logistic GLMM: p < 0.001). The dataset is available in the Supplementary Materials.
Sustainability 14 06909 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abe, N.; Koyama, K.; Okamoto, A.; Katayama, K.; Kato, Y.; Mimura, N.; Okoshi, S.; Tanaka, Y. Seed Mucilage Promotes Dispersal of Plantago asiatica Seeds by Facilitating Attachment to Shoes. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6909. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116909

AMA Style

Abe N, Koyama K, Okamoto A, Katayama K, Kato Y, Mimura N, Okoshi S, Tanaka Y. Seed Mucilage Promotes Dispersal of Plantago asiatica Seeds by Facilitating Attachment to Shoes. Sustainability. 2022; 14(11):6909. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116909

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abe, Nanako, Kohei Koyama, Azumi Okamoto, Kowa Katayama, Yura Kato, Natsuki Mimura, Shoji Okoshi, and Yuki Tanaka. 2022. "Seed Mucilage Promotes Dispersal of Plantago asiatica Seeds by Facilitating Attachment to Shoes" Sustainability 14, no. 11: 6909. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116909

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop