Bringing the Social Back into Sustainability: Why Integrative Negotiation Matters
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Theoretical Framework
The Gender Paradigm: From Diversity to Equality
3. Discussion
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Crane, A.; Matten, D. Business Ethics: Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization; Oxford University Press: Oxford, MI, USA, 2019; ISBN 9780192554871. [Google Scholar]
- Khan, M.; Hussain, M.; Papastathopoulos, A.; Manikas, I. Trust, information sharing and uncertainty: An empirical investigation into their impact on sustainability in service supply chains in the united arab emirates. Sustain. Dev. 2018, 26, 870–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hussain, N.; Rigoni, U.; Orij, R.P. Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. J. Bus. Ethics 2018, 149, 411–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hacking, T.; Guthrie, P. A framework for clarifying the meaning of triple bottom-line, integrated, and sustainability assessment. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2008, 28, 73–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alhaddi, H. Triple bottom line and sustainability: A literature review. Bus. Manag. Stud. 2015, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milne, M.J.; Gray, R. W(h)Ither Ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 118, 13–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ribeiro Siman, R.; Yamane, L.H.; de Lima Baldam, R.; Pardinho Tackla, J.; de Assis Lessa, S.F.; Mendonça de Britto, P. Governance tools: Improving the circular economy through the promotion of the economic sustainability of waste picker organizations. Waste Manag. 2020, 105, 148–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ajmal, M.M.; Khan, M.; Hussain, M.; Helo, P. Conceptualizing and incorporating social sustainability in the business world. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2018, 25, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Adomako, S.; Amankwah-Amoah, J.; Danso, A.; Konadu, R.; Owusu-Agyei, S. Environmental sustainability orientation and performance of family and nonfamily firms. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2019, 28, 1250–1259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eizenberg, E.; Jabareen, Y. Social sustainability: A new conceptual framework. Sustainability 2017, 9, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Littig, B.; Grießler, E. Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. 2005, 8, 65–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Hiedanpää, J.; Jokinen, A.; Jokinen, P. Making Sense of the Social: Human-nonhuman constellations and the wicked road to sustainability. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2012, 8, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Boström, M. A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2012, 8, 3–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rogers, S.H.; Gardner, K.H.; Carlson, C.H. Social capital and walkability as social aspects of sustainability. Sustainability 2013, 5, 3473–3483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Colantonio, A. Social sustainability: A review and critique of traditional versus emerging themes and assessment methods. In Proceedings of the Sue-Mot Conference 2009: Second International Conference on Whole Life Urban Sustainability and Its Assessment, Loughborough, UK, 22–24 April 2009; pp. 865–885. [Google Scholar]
- Hernández-Lara, A.B.; Gonzales-Bustos, J.P.; Alarcón-Alarcón, A. Social Sustainability on Corporate Boards: The effects of female family members on R&D. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Y.S.; Wang, C.; Chen, Y.R.; Lo, W.Y.; Chen, K.L. Influence of network embeddedness and network diversity on green innovation: The mediation effect of green social capital. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Brett, J.; Thompson, L. Negotiation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2016, 136, 68–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pender, E.R.; Elgoibar, P.; Munduate, L.; García, A.B.; Euwema, M.C. Improving social dialogue: What employers expect from employee representatives. Econ. Labour Relat. Rev. 2018, 29, 169–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Euwema, M.; Munduate, L.; Elgoibar, P.; Pender, E.; Belén García, A. Promoting Social Dialogue in European Organizations. Human Resources Management and Constructive Conflict Management; Euwema, M., Munduate, L., Elgoibar, P., Pender, E., Belén García, A., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; ISBN 9783319086057. [Google Scholar]
- Cockburn, C. Strategies for gender democracy: Strengthening the representation of trade union women in the European social dialogue. Eur. J. Women Stud. 1996, 3, 7–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asteriti, A. Social dialogue, laval-style. Eur. J. Leg. Stud. 2012, 5, 58–79. [Google Scholar]
- Le Roux, C.; Pretorius, M. Navigating sustainability embeddedness in management decision-making. Sustainability 2016, 8, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Teles, M.d.F.; De Sousa, J.F. Linking fields with GMA: Sustainability, companies, people and operational research. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 126, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moreira, M.G.A.L.; Hinegk, L.; Salvadore, A.; Zolezzi, G.; Hölker, F.; Domecq, S.R.A.M.; Bocci, M.; Carrer, S.; De Nat, L.; Escribá, J.; et al. Eutrophication, research and management history of the Shallow Ypacaraí Lake (Paraguay). Sustainability 2018, 10, 2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ploum, L.; Blok, V.; Lans, T.; Omta, O. Toward a validated competence framework for sustainable entrepreneurship. Organ. Environ. 2018, 31, 113–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Arora-Jonsson, S.; Sijapati, B.B. Disciplining gender in environmental organizations: The texts and practices of gender mainstreaming. Gend. Work. Organ. 2018, 25, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bear, S.; Rahman, N.; Post, C. The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. J. Bus. Ethics 2010, 97, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Halliday, C.S.; Paustian-Underdahl, S.C.; Fainshmidt, S. Women on boards of directors: A meta-analytic examination of the roles of organizational leadership and national context for gender equality. J. Bus. Psychol. 2021, 36, 173–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nielsen, S.; Huse, M. The contribution of women on boards of directors: Going beyond the surface. Corp. Gov. An Int. Rev. 2010, 18, 136–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Westphal, J.D.; Milton, L.P. How experience and network ties affect the influence of demographic minorities on corporate boards. Adm. Sci. Q 2000, 45, 366–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Nekhili, M.; Gatfaoui, H. Are demographic attributes and firm characteristics drivers of gender diversity? Investigating women’s positions on french boards of directors. J. Bus. Ethics 2013, 118, 227–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Post, C.; Byron, K. Women on boards and firm financial performance: A meta-analysis. Acad. Manag. J. 2015, 58, 1546–1571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kassinis, G.; Panayiotou, A.; Dimou, A.; Katsifaraki, G. Gender and environmental sustainability: A longitudinal analysis. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2016, 23, 399–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duncan, S.; Pfau-Effinger, B. Gender, Economy and Culture in the European Union; Routledge: London, UK, 2000; ISBN 9781134554515. [Google Scholar]
- Kray, L.J.; Galinsky, A.D.; Thompson, L. Reversing the gender gap in negotiations: An exploration of stereotype regeneration. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2002, 87, 386–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Manea, C.N.; Yzerbyt, V.; Demoulin, S. He, she, “they” at the bargaining table … woman, man or just negotiators? A critical review on gender ideologies in mixed-gender negotiations. Psychol. Belg. 2020, 60, 236–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Small, D.A.; Gelfand, M.; Babcock, L.; Gettman, H. Who goes to the bargaining table? The influence of gender and framing on the initiation of negotiation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2007, 93, 600–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valdivia, C.; Gilles, J. Gender and resource management: Households and groups, strategies and transitions. Agric. Hum. Values 2001, 18, 5–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meinzen-Dick, R.; Kovarik, C.; Quisumbing, A.R. Gender and sustainability. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2014, 39, 29–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickens, L. Collective bargaining and the promotion of gender equality at work: Opportunities and challenges for trade unions. Transf. Eur. Rev. Labour Res. 2000, 6, 193–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scambor, E.; Bergmann, N.; Wojnicka, K.; Belghiti-Mahut, S.; Hearn, J.; Holter, Ø.G.; Gärtner, M.; Hrženjak, M.; Scambor, C.; White, A. Men and gender equality: European insights. Men Masc. 2014, 17, 552–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bowles, H.R.; Babcock, L.; McGinn, K.L. Constraints and triggers: Situational mechanics of gender in negotiation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2005, 89, 951–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagly, A.H. Reporting sex differences. Am. Psychol. 1987, 42, 756–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amanatullah, E.T.; Morris, M.W. Negotiating gender roles: Gender differences in assertive negotiating are mediated by women’s fear of backlash and attenuated when negotiating on behalf of others. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 98, 256–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Garrigos-Simon, F.J.; Botella-Carrubi, M.D.; Gonzalez-Cruz, T.F. Social Capital, Human Capital, and Sustainability: A bibliometric and visualization analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Parsons, R. The emergene of institutionalised social dialogue South Africa. S. Afr. J. Econ. 2007, 75, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sajjad, A.; Shahbaz, W. Mindfulness and social sustainability: An integrative review. Soc. Indic. Res. 2020, 150, 73–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Forrest, R.; Kearns, A. Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Stud. 2001, 38, 2125–2143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Payán-Sánchez, B.; Plaza-Úbeda, J.A.; Pérez-Valls, M.; Carmona-Moreno, E. Social embeddedness for sustainability in the aviation sector. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2018, 25, 537–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Granovetter, M.; Swedberg, R. The Sociology of Economic Life, Third Edition. Sociol. Econ. Life Third Ed. 2018, 42, 1–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kim, Y.; Yun, S.; Lee, J. Can companies induce sustainable consumption? The impact of knowledge and social embeddedness on airline sustainability programs in the U.S. Sustainability 2014, 6, 3338–3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fan, Y.; Xia, M.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y. The influence of social embeddedness on organizational legitimacy and the sustainability of the globalization of the sharing economic platform: Evidence from uber China. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 151, 104490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sharafizad, J.; Redmond, J.; Parker, C. The Influence of local embeddedness on the economic, social, and environmental sustainability practices of regional small firms. Entrep. Reg. Dev. 2022, 34, 57–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Valente, M. Business sustainability embeddedness as a strategic imperative: A process framework. Bus. Soc. 2015, 54, 126–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hwang, Y.Y.; Jo, G.Y.; Oh, M.J. The persuasive effect of competence and warmth on clothing sustainable consumption: The moderating role of consumer knowledge and social embeddedness. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Moran, P. Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strateg. Manag. J. 2005, 26, 1129–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, T.W.H.; Feldman, D.C. The effects of organizational embeddedness on development of social capital and human capital. J. Appl. Psychol. 2010, 95, 696–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Reagans, R.; McEvily, B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Adm. Sci. Q 2003, 240–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kamath, A.; Cowan, R. Social cohesion and knowledge diffusion: Understanding the embeddedness-homophily association. Socio-Econ. Rev. 2015, 13, 723–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moody, J.; White, D.R. Structural cohesion and embeddedness: A hierarchical concept of social groups. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2003, 68, 103–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Turnbull, P. From social conflict to social dialogue: Counter-mobilization on the European waterfront. Eur. J. Ind. Relat. 2010, 16, 333–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Prins, P.; Stuer, D.; Gielens, T. Revitalizing social dialogue in the workplace: The impact of a cooperative industrial relations climate and sustainable HR practices on reducing employee harm. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2020, 31, 1684–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Visser, J. Variations and trends in European industrial relations in the 21st century’s first decade. In Industrial Relations in Europe 2010; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2011; pp. 17–53. [Google Scholar]
- Cutcher-Gershenfeld, J.; Kochan, T. Taking stock: Collective bargaining at the turn of the century. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 2004, 58, 3–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Elgoibar, P.; Medina, F.J.; Euwema, M.C.; Munduate, L. Increasing integrative negotiation in european organizations through trustworthiness and trust. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 2180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Williamson, S.; Baird, M. Gender equality bargaining: Developing theory and practice. J. Ind. Relat. 2014, 56, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- García, A.B.; Pender, E.; Elgoibar, P. The state of art: Trust and conflict management in organizational industrial relations. In Building Trust and Constructive Conflict Management in Organizations; Springer International: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 29–51. [Google Scholar]
- Ferrin, D.L.; Bligh, M.C.; Kohles, J.C. It takes two to tango: An interdependence analysis of the spiraling of perceived trustworthiness and cooperation in interpersonal and intergroup relationships. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2008, 107, 161–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, M.C.; Mai, Q.; Tsai, S.B.; Dai, Y. An empirical study on the organizational trust, employee-organization relationship and innovative behavior from the integrated perspective of social exchange and organizational sustainability. Sustainability 2018, 10, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Thompson, L.; Peterson, E.; Brodt, S.E. Team negotiation: An examination of integrative and distributive bargaining. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 70, 66–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cropanzano, R.; Mitchell, M.S. Social exchange theory: An interdisciplinary review. J. Manag. 2005, 31, 874–900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Munduate, L.; Euwema, M.; Elgoibar, P. Constructive conflict management in organizations: Taking stock and looking forward. In Building Trust and Constructive Conflict Management in Organizations; Springer International: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 213–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shore, L.M.; Lynch, P.; Tetrick, L.E.; Barksdale, K. Social and economic exchange: Construct development and validation. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2006, 36, 837–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blau, P.M. Exchange and Power in Social Life; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 2017; ISBN 9781351521208. [Google Scholar]
- Kinge, J. Testing times: The development and sustainability of partnership relationships. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2014, 25, 852–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guest, D.E. Trust and the role of the psychological contract in contemporary employment relations. In Building Trust and Constructive Conflict Management in Organizations; Springer International: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 137–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Johnston, D.A.; McCutcheon, D.M.; Stuart, F.I.; Kerwood, H. Effects of supplier trust on performance of cooperative supplier relationships. J. Oper. Manag. 2004, 22, 23–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolis, I.; Morioka, S.N.; Leite, W.K.D.S.; Zambroni-De-souza, P.C. Sustainability is all about values: The challenges of considering moral and benefit values in business model decisions. Sustainability 2021, 13, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lai, K.H.; Wong, C.W.Y.; Lam, J.S.L. Sharing environmental management information with supply chain partners and the performance contingencies on environmental munificence. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 164, 445–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazei, J.; Mertes, M.; Hüffmeier, J. Strategies aimed at reducing gender differences in negotiation are perceived by women as ineffective. Sex Roles 2020, 83, 580–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kray, L.J.; Gelfand, M.J. Relief versus regret: The effect of gender and negotiating norm ambiguity on reactions to having one’s first offer accepted. Soc. Cogn. 2009, 27, 418–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, C.; Shirako, A. Are individuals’ reputations related to their history of behavior? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 94, 320–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Walters, A.E.; Stuhlmacher, A.F.; Meyer, L.L. Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1998, 76, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagly, A.H.; Sczesny, S. Editorial: Gender roles in the future? Theoretical foundations and future research directions. Front. Psychol. 2019, 10, 1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagly, A.H. The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. Am. Psychol. 2009, 64, 644–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eagly, A.H.; Nater, C.; Miller, D.I.; Kaufmann, M.; Sczesny, S. Gender stereotypes have changed: A cross-temporal meta-analysis of U.S. public opinion polls from 1946 to 2018. Am. Psychol. 2020, 75, 301–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rudman, L.A.; Moss-Racusin, C.A.; Phelan, J.E.; Nauts, S. Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the Gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2012, 48, 165–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bowles, H.R.; Babcock, L.; Lai, L. Social incentives for gender differences in the propensity to initiate negotiations: Sometimes it does hurt to ask. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 2007, 103, 84–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazei, J.; Hüffmeier, J.; Freund, P.A.; Stuhlmacher, A.F.; Bilke, L.; Hertel, G. A Meta-analysis on gender differences in negotiation outcomes and their moderators. Psychol. Bull. 2015, 141, 85–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tjosvold, D.; Wan, P.; Tang, M.M.L. Trust and managing conflict: Partners in developing organizations. In Building Trust and Constructive Conflict Management in Organizations; Springer International: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2016; pp. 53–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Dreu, C.K.W.; Beersma, B.; Stroebe, K.; Euwema, M.C. Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2006, 90, 927–943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Thompson, L.L. Information exchange in negotiation. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1991, 27, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stuhlmacher, A.F.; Walters, A.E. Gender differences in negotiation outcome: A meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 1999, 52, 653–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Backhaus, K.; Van Doorn, J.; Wilken, R. The impact of team characteristics on the course and outcome of intergroup price negotiations. J. Bus.-Bus. Mark. 2008, 15, 365–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hooghe, M. Social capital and diversity generalized trust, social cohesion and regimes of diversity. Can. J. Polit. Sci. 2007, 40, 709–732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Dreu, C.K.W.; Koole, S.L.; Steinel, W. Unfixing the fixed pie: A motivated information-processing approach to integrative negotiation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 79, 975–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McLaren, C.D.; Spink, K.S. Examining communication as information exchange as a predictor of task cohesion in sport teams. Int. J. Sport Commun. 2018, 11, 149–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bottom, W.P.; Studt, A. Framing effects and the distributive aspect of integrative bargaining. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1993, 56, 459–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, J.; Rahman, H.A.; Suh, J.; Hussin, H. A study of integrative bargaining model with argumentation-based negotiation. Sustainability 2019, 11, 6832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Uzzi, B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Adm. Sci. Q 1997, 42, 35–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Molm, L.D.; Melamed, D.; Whitham, M.M. Behavioral Consequences of Embeddedness: Effects of the underlying forms of exchange. Soc. Psychol. Q 2013, 76, 73–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, X.; Miller, S.J. Negotiation approaches: Direct and indirect effect of national culture. Int. Mark. Rev. 2003, 20, 286–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Dreu, C.K.W.; Weingart, L.R.; Kwon, S. Influence of social motives on integrative negotiation: A Meta-analytic review and test of two theories. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2000, 78, 889–905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barry, B.; Friedman, R.A. Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 74, 345–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Benetti, S.; Ogliastri, E.; Caputo, A. Distributive/integrative negotiation strategies in cross-cultural contexts: A comparative study of the USA and Italy. J. Manag. Organ. 2021, 27, 786–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ben-Amar, W.; Chang, M.; McIlkenny, P. Board gender diversity and corporate response to sustainability initiatives: Evidence from the carbon disclosure project. J. Bus. Ethics 2017, 142, 369–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ko, Y.; Ko, H.; Chung, Y.; Woo, C. Do gender equality and work-life balance matter for innovation performance? Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 2021, 33, 148–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Flynn, F.; Wiltermuth, S. Who’s with me? False consensus, brokerage, and ethical decision making in organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 2010, 53, 1074–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Harjoto, M.A.; Wang, Y. Board of directors network centrality and environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Corp. Gov. 2020, 20, 965–985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jack, S.L.; Anderson, A.R. The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. J. Bus. Ventur. 2002, 17, 467–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gargiulo, M.; Benassi, M. Trapped in your own net? Network cohesion, structural holes, and the adaptation of social capital. Organ. Sci. 2000, 11, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coetzer, A.; Inma, C.; Poisat, P. The job embeddedness-turnover relationship: Effects of organisation size and work group cohesion. Pers. Rev. 2017, 46, 1070–1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- De Dreu, C.K.W.; Evers, A.; Beersma, B.; Kluwer, E.S.; Nauta, A. A theory-based measure of conflict management strategies in the workplace. J. Organ. Behav. 2001, 22, 645–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Traavik, L.E.M. Is bigger better? Dyadic and multiparty integrative negotiations. Int. J. Confl. Manag. 2011, 22, 190–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Elgoibar, P.; Shijaku, E. Bringing the Social Back into Sustainability: Why Integrative Negotiation Matters. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116699
Elgoibar P, Shijaku E. Bringing the Social Back into Sustainability: Why Integrative Negotiation Matters. Sustainability. 2022; 14(11):6699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116699
Chicago/Turabian StyleElgoibar, Patricia, and Elio Shijaku. 2022. "Bringing the Social Back into Sustainability: Why Integrative Negotiation Matters" Sustainability 14, no. 11: 6699. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116699