Assessing the Green R&D Investment and Patent Generation in Pakistan towards CO2 Emissions Reduction with a Novel Decomposition Framework
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
3. Methodology
3.1. Patent Model
3.2. Association between LMDI I, LMDI II and IPAT
3.3. LMDI Approach
3.4. Patent Model
3.5. New Patent Framework
3.6. Statistics of the Variables
Data Source
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Time Grid of Patent Applications
4.2. LMDI Analysis
4.2.1. Base-Year Analysis
4.2.2. Forecast of the Individual Increase in Variables
5. Conclusions and Policy Recommendations
5.1. Conclusions
5.2. Model Implementation and Policy Suggestions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A
Description | WIPO Origin Code | |
---|---|---|
Electrical machinery, apparatus, energy | Energy efficiency, reduce the overall environmental impact and cost to operate equipment. Advancements in electric motor design and modern automation equipment can be extremely energy efficient. | PK-1 |
Telecommunications | Benefits of data aggregation on energy consumption networks | PK-3 |
Chemical engineering | Process integration, heat integration, energy integration and pinch technology | PK-23 |
Environmental technology | Benefits of clean energy. Reduced air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions | PK-24 |
Digital communication | Stunning advances in data, analytics and connectivity are enabling a range of new digital applications such as smart appliances, shared mobility, and 3D printing | PK-4 |
Computer technology | Green computing, recyclable and implementing energy efficient technologies | PK-6 |
IT methods for management | Energy efficiency technologies and energy management practices | PK-7 |
Measurement | Cost-efficient approach | PK-10 |
Control | Energy use in different places | PK-12 |
Medical technology | Historically, equipment designers have paid little attention to energy consumption in electrical devices due to the low cost of energy in the developed world | PK-13 |
Organic fine chemistry | Techniques for the Manufacture of Organic Fine Chemicals | PK-14 |
Biotechnology | Contribute to the fossil fuel industry by assisting the production of fossil fuels, upgrading fuels, bioremediation of water, soil, and air. | PK-15 |
Pharmaceuticals | Manufacturing facilities, and other buildings to reduce energy consumption while maintaining or enhancing productivity | PK-16 |
Food chemistry | Direct energy use for crop management and indirect energy for fertilizers, pesticides and machinery production | PK-18 |
Basic materials chemistry | Control and fundamental understanding of the chemistry are of paramount importance for the design of new energy-related materials | PK-19 |
Materials, metallurgy | The reduction of GHG emissions from manufacturing, the environmental impact of the whole powder metallurgy production | PK-20 |
Surface technology, coating | Coating and plating services provide overcome corrosion, release, wear and friction challenges for oil and gas, mining, food and drink equipment | PK-21 |
Handling | Governments, businesses and individuals all play a role | PK-25 |
Machine tools | Advanced machine tool technology can be used as a highly effective energy saving tactic | PK26 |
Engines, pumps, turbines | Gas-turbine plants; air intakes for jet-propulsion plants; a controlling fuel supply in air-breathing jet propulsion plants | PK-27 |
Textile and paper machines | Industrial consumption and modern machines | PK-28 |
Other special machines | Fewer consumption machines | PK-29 |
Transport | Domestic Electricity Saving Measures | PK-32 |
Furniture, games | Improving efficiencies and identifying areas of improvement | PK-33 |
Civil engineering | High-efficiency equipment and automatic controls to minimize energy | PK-35 |
References
- Cho, J.H.; Sohn, S.Y. A novel decomposition analysis of green patent applications for the evaluation of R&D efforts to reduce CO2 emissions from fossil fuel energy consumption. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 193, 290–299. [Google Scholar]
- Wesseh, P.K., Jr.; Lin, B. Renewable energy technologies as beacon of cleaner production: A real options valuation analysis for Liberia. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 90, 300–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Braun, M.; Fritz, D.; Weiss, P.; Braschel, N.; Büchsenmeister, R.; Freudenschuß, A.; Pölz, W. A holistic assessment of greenhouse gas dynamics from forests to the effects of wood products use in Austria. Carbon Manag. 2016, 7, 271–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, K.; Lin, B. Impacts of urbanization and industrialization on energy consumption/CO2 emissions: Does the level of development matter? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 52, 1107–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Ahmad, I. Energy substitution effect on transport sector of Pakistan based on trans-log production function. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 1182–1193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eckstein, D.; Künzel, V.; Schäfer, L. Global Climate Risk Index 2018. Germanwatch. 2017. Available online: www.germanwatch.org/en/cri (accessed on 23 January 2018).
- Muradov, N. Low to near-zero CO2 production of hydrogen from fossil fuels: Status and perspectives. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 14058–14088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kwon, D.S.; Cho, J.H.; Sohn, S.Y. Comparison of technology efficiency for CO2 emissions reduction among European countries based on DEA with decomposed factors. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 151, 109–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guan, D.; Hubacek, K.; Weber, C.L.; Peters, G.P.; Reiner, D.M. The drivers of Chinese CO2 emissions from 1980 to 2030. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2008, 18, 626–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Jung, S.; An, K.J.; Dodbiba, G.; Fujita, T. Regional energy-related carbon emission characteristics and potential mitigation in eco-industrial parks in South Korea: Logarithmic mean Divisia index analysis based on the Kaya identity. Energy 2012, 46, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sohn, S.Y.; Jeon, J.; Han, E.J. A new cost of ownership model for the acquisition of technology complying with environmental regulations. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 100, 269–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jeon, J.; Sohn, S.Y. Concept design of commercial diesel engines reflecting customer preference. Int. J. Veh. Des. 2016, 72, 143–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tamazian, A.; Rao, B.B. Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ. 2010, 32, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Siddiqui, A.; Fleten, S.-E. How to proceed with competing alternative energy technologies: A real options analysis. Energy Econ. 2010, 32, 817–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Rothwell, G. Managing advanced technology system deployment: An optimal al-location between R&D and prototype funding. Econ. Innov. New Technol. 2007, 16, 419–432. [Google Scholar]
- Kobos, P.H.; Erickson, J.D.; Drennen, T.E. Technological learning and renewable energy costs: Implications for US renewable energy policy. Energy Policy 2006, 34, 1645–1658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dinan, D. Ever closer union: An introduction to European integration. Integration 2006, 1945, 11. [Google Scholar]
- Olivier, J.; Schure, K.M.; Peters, J.A. Trends in Global CO2 and total Greenhouse gas emissions. PBL Neth. Environ. Assess. Agency 2017, 5, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Wesseh, P.K., Jr.; Lin, B. A real options valuation of Chinese wind energy technologies for power generation: Do benefits from the feed-in tariffs outweigh costs? J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 112, 1591–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Tan, R. China’s CO2 emissions of a critical sector: Evidence from energy intensive industries. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 4270–4281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Statistical Review. 2018. Available online: https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/en/corporate/pdf/energy-economics/statistical-review/bp-stats-review-2018-co2-emissions.pdf (accessed on 3 January 2022).
- Weixian, W.; Fang, Y. Impact of Technology Advance on Carbon Dioxide Emission in China. Stat. Res. 2010, 7, 9. [Google Scholar]
- Cheng, Y.; Ma, H.J.; Wang, D. Analysis of factors affecting carbon dioxide emission in jiangsu: Based on the 1998–2007 panel empirical data. China Urban Econ. 2011, 4, 254–258. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, B.; Lin, B. A quantile regression analysis of China’s provincial CO2 emissions: Where does the difference lie? Energy Policy 2016, 98, 328–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kahouli, B. The causality link between energy electricity consumption, CO2 emissions, R&D stocks and economic growth in Mediterranean countries (MCs). Energy 2017, 145, 388–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tangen, G.; Mølnvik, M.J.; Røkke, N.A. BIG CO2 R&D platform breakthrough CCS technologies enabling large-scale CO2 chains. Energy Procedia 2011, 4, 6077–6084. [Google Scholar]
- Weina, D.; Botang, H.; Xin, Z.; Mazzanti, M. How does green technology influence CO2 emission in China?—An empirical research based on provincial data of China. J. Environ. Biol. 2015, 36, 745. [Google Scholar]
- Su, H.-N.; Moaniba, I.M. Does innovation respond to climate change? Empirical evidence from patents and greenhouse gas emissions. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2017, 122, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hadef, A.; Mameri, A.; Tabet, F.; Aouachria, Z. Numerical Study of the Impact of CO2 Dilution on Emissions in Turbulent Diffusion Flame. Energy Procedia 2017, 139, 273–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Y.; Lu, Y.; Wang, T.; Ma, H.; He, G. Pattern of patent-based environmental technology innovation in China. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2008, 75, 1032–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.; Yin, F.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X. An empirical research on the influencing factors of regional CO2 emissions: Evidence from Beijing city, China. Appl. Energy 2012, 100, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, B.K.; Sohn, S.Y. Patent portfolio-based indicators to evaluate the com-mercial benefits of national plant genetic resources. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 70, 43–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leoncini, R.; Montresor, S.; Rentocchini, F. CO2-reducing innovations and outsourcing: Evidence from photovoltaics and green construction in North-East Italy. Res. Policy 2016, 45, 1649–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bel, G.; Joseph, S. Climate change mitigation and the role of technological change: Impact on selected headline targets of Europe’s 2020 climate and energy package. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 82, 3798–3807. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, N.; Guan, J. Policy and innovation: Nanoenergy technology in the USA and China. Energy Policy 2016, 91, 220–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meliciani, V. The relationship between R&D, investment and patents: A panel data analysis. Appl. Econ. 2000, 32, 1429–1437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Maria, C.; Van der Werf, E. Carbon leakage revisited: Unilateral climate policy with directed technical change. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2008, 39, 55–74. [Google Scholar]
- Carraro, C.; De Cian, E.; Nicita, L.; Massetti, E.; Verdolini, E. Environmental policy and technical change: A survey. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2010, 4, 163–219. [Google Scholar]
- Li, K.; Lin, B. An application of a double bootstrap to investigate the effects of technological progress on total-factor energy consumption performance in China. Energy 2017, 128, 575–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Apergis, N.; Eleftheriou, S.; Payne, J.E. The relationship between international financial reporting standards, carbon emissions, and R&D expenditures: Evidence from European manufacturing firms. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 88, 57–66. [Google Scholar]
- Li, K.; Lin, B. Impact of energy technology patents in China: Evidence from a panel cointegration and error correction model. Energy Policy 2016, 89, 214–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Zhao, H. Energy efficiency and conservation in China’s chemical fiber industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 103, 345–352. [Google Scholar]
- Manoli, G.; Katul, G.G.; Marani, M. Delay-induced rebounds in CO2 emissions and critical time-scales to meet global warming targets. Earth’s Futur. 2016, 4, 636–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Obani, P.; Gupta, J. The impact of economic recession on climate change: Eight trends. Clim. Dev. 2015, 8, 211–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rafique, M.M.; Rehman, S. National energy scenario of Pakistan–Current status, future alternatives, and institutional infrastructure: An overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 156–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, S.H.; Raja, I.A.; Rizwan, M.; Rashid, N.; Mahmood, Q.; Shah, F.A.; Pervez, A. Potential of microalgal biodiesel production and its sustainability perspectives in Pakistan. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 81, 76–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lucas, R.E., Jr. On the mechanics of economic development. J. Monet. Econ. 1988, 22, 3–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, C.F.; Tan, E.C. Exploring the nexus of electricity consumption, economic growth, energy prices and technology innovation in Malaysia. Appl. Energy 2013, 104, 297–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fei, Q.; Rasiah, R.; Shen, L.J. The clean energy-growth nexus with CO2 emissions and technological innovation in Norway and New Zealand. Energy Environ. 2014, 25, 1323–1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernández, Y.F.; López, M.F.; Blanco, B.O. Innovation for sustainability: The impact of R&D spending on CO2 emissions. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 172, 3459–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Raza, M.Y. Analysis of energy related CO2 emissions in Pakistan. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 219, 981–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akbostancı, E.; Tunç, G.İ.; Türüt-Aşık, S. CO2 emissions of Turkish manufacturing industry: A de-composition analysis. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 2273–2278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Huijie, Z.; Zhao, T.; Wang, H.; Guo, H.; Zhang, G.; Liu, Z. Discussions on availability of energy intensity in residential re-search and decomposition analysis of Chinese residential CO2 emissions. Carbon Manag. 2015, 7, 13–26. [Google Scholar]
- Boyd, G.A.; Hanson, D.A.; Sterner, T. Decomposition of changes in energy intensity: A comparison of the Divisia index and other methods. Energy Econ. 1988, 10, 309–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, K.; Siu, Y.L.; Guan, D.; Hubacek, K. Analyzing Drivers of Regional Carbon Dioxide Emissions for China. J. Ind. Ecol. 2012, 16, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yuan, R.; Zhao, T. Changes in CO2 emissions from China’s energy-intensive industries: A subsystem input–output decomposition analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 117, 98–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Y.; Zhao, H.; Li, L.; Liu, Z.; Liang, S. Carbon dioxide emission drivers for a typical metropolis using input–output structural decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 2013, 58, 312–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Casler, S.D.; Rose, A. Carbon dioxide emissions in the US economy: A struc-tural decomposition analysis. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1998, 11, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Geng, Y.; Ulgiati, S.; Park, H.S.; Tsuyoshi, F.; Wang, H. Uncovering key factors influencing one industrial park’s sustainabil-ity: A combined evaluation method of emergy analysis and index decomposition analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Leontief, W. Air Pollution and the Economic Structure: Empirical Results of Input-Output Comparisons, 2nd ed.; Input-Output Economics: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1972; pp. 273–293. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, H.; Qi, Y. A Structure Decomposition Analysis of China’s Production-Source CO2 Emission: 1992–2002. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011, 49, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohlin, K.; Camuzeaux, J.R.; Muller, A.; Schneider, M.; Wagner, G. Factoring in the forgotten role of renewables in CO2 emission trends using decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 2018, 116, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, H.; Ang, B.; Su, B. Multiplicative structural decomposition analysis of energy and emission intensities: Some methodological issues. Energy 2017, 123, 47–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, Y.-J.; Da, Y.-B. The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 41, 1255–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Long, H. Emissions reduction in China’s chemical industry–Based on LMDI. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 53, 1348–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, F.; Ang, B. Methodological issues in cross-country/region decomposition of energy and environment indicators. Energy Econ. 2001, 23, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, X.; Shao, S.; Lin, B. Exploring the driving forces and mitigation pathways of CO2 emissions in China’s petroleum refining and coking industry: 1995–2031. Appl. Energy 2016, 184, 1004–1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Du, K. Measuring energy rebound effect in the Chinese economy: An economic accounting approach. Energy Econ. 2015, 50, 96–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ang, B.W.; Zhang, F.Q. A survey of index decomposition analysis in energy and environmental studies. Energy 2000, 25, 1149–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, J. Changes in energy consumption and energy intensity: A complete decom-position model. Energy Econ. 1998, 20, 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ang, B.; Lee, S. Decomposition of industrial energy consumption: Some methodological and application issues. Energy Econ. 1994, 16, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ang, B.W.; Zhang, F.Q.; Choi, K.-H. Factorizing changes in energy and environmental indicators through decomposition. Energy 1998, 23, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ang, B.W.; Liu, F.L. A new energy decomposition method: Perfect in decom-position and consistent in aggregation. Energy 2001, 26, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ang, B.W.; Liu, N. Handling zero values in the logarithmic mean Divisia index decomposition approach. Energy Policy 2007, 35, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Ahmad, I. Analysis of energy related carbon dioxide emission and re-duction potential in Pakistan. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 278–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tan, Z.; Li, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, J. Examining the driving forces for improving China’s CO2 emission intensity using the decomposing method. Appl. Energy 2011, 88, 4496–4504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, X.; Zhao, T.; Liu, N.; Kang, J. Changes of energy-related GHG emissions in China: An empirical analysis from sectoral perspective. Appl. Energy 2014, 132, 298–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shahid-uz-zaman, M.; Layton, A. Changes in CO2 emissions over business cycle recessions and expansions in the United States: A decomposition analysis. Appl. Energy 2015, 150, 25–35. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Liu, W. Determinants of CO2 emissions from household daily travel in Beijing, China: Individual travel characteristic perspectives. Appl. Energy 2015, 158, 292–299. [Google Scholar]
- Choi, K.-H.; Ang, B. Attribution of changes in Divisia real energy intensity index—An extension to index decomposition analysis. Energy Econ. 2012, 34, 171–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, M.; Mu, H.; Ning, Y.; Song, Y. Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission over 1991–2006 in China. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68, 2122–2128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jia, J.; Gong, Z.; Xie, D.; Chen, J.; Chen, C. Analysis of drivers and policy implications of carbon dioxide emissions of industrial energy consumption in an underdeveloped city: The case of Nanchang, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 183, 843–857. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, B.; Lei, X. Carbon emissions reduction in China’s food industry. Energy Policy 2015, 86, 483–492. [Google Scholar]
- Román-Collado, R.; Cansino, J.M.; Botia, C. How far is Colombia from decoupling? Two-level decomposition analysis of energy consumption changes. Energy 2018, 148, 687–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Donglan, Z.; Dequn, Z.; Peng, Z. Driving forces of residential CO2 emissions in urban and rural China: An index decomposition analysis. Energy Policy 2010, 38, 3377–3383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fujii, H.; Managi, S. Research and development strategy for environmental technology in Japan: A comparative study of the private and public sectors. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2016, 112, 293–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Fujii, H.; Yoshida, K.; Sugimura, K. Research and Development Strategy in Biological Technologies: A Patent Data Analysis of Japanese Manufacturing Firms. Sustainability 2016, 8, 351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Qiu, H.-H.; Yang, J. An Assessment of Technological Innovation Capabilities of Carbon Capture and Storage Technology Based on Patent Analysis: A Comparative Study between China and the United States. Sustainability 2018, 10, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Tseng, F.-M.; Hsieh, C.-H.; Peng, Y.-N.; Chu, Y.-W. Using patent data to analyze trends and the technological strategies of the amorphous silicon thin-film solar cell industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2011, 78, 332–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geng, Y.; Fujita, T.; Park, H.-S.; Chiu, A.S.F.; Huisingh, D. Recent progress on innovative eco-industrial development. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, B.; Lin, B. What cause a surge in China’s CO2 emissions? A dynamic vector autoregression analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 17–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fabrizi, A.; Guarini, G.; Meliciani, V. Green patents, regulatory policies and research network policies. Res. Policy 2018, 47, 1018–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahmad, M.; Wu, Y. Combined role of green productivity growth, economic globalization, and eco-innovation in achieving ecological sustainability for OECD economies. J. Environ. Manag. 2022, 302, 113980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gao, X.; Wang, S.; Ahmad, F.; Chandio, A.A.; Ahmad, M.; Xue, D. The nexus between misallocation of land resources and green technological innovation: A novel investigation of Chinese cities. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2021, 23, 2101–2115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qamar, S.; Ahmad, M.; Oryani, B.; Zhang, Q. Solar energy technology adoption and diffusion by micro, small, and medium enterprises: Sustainable energy for climate change mitigation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rehman, A.; Ma, H.; Ahmad, M.; Ozturk, I.; Işık, C. Estimating the connection of information technology, foreign direct investment, trade, renewable energy and eco-nomic progress in Pakistan: Evidence from ARDL approach and cointegrating regression analysis. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2021, 28, 50623–50635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shahzad, F.; Ahmad, M.; Fareed, Z.; Wang, Z. Innovation decisions through firm life cycle: A new evidence from emerging markets. Int. Rev. Econ. Financ. 2021, 78, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ang, B.W. Decomposition analysis for policymaking in energy: Which is the preferred method? Energy Policy 2004, 32, 1131–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaya, Y. Impact of Carbon Dioxide Emission Control on GNP Growth: Interpretation of Proposed Scenarios. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change/Response Strategies Working Group, May. 1989. Available online: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Impact-of-carbon-dioxide-emission-control-on-GNP-%3A-Kaya/b6bfe4ed86901a81b644062e839ce7485d82d60f (accessed on 10 January 2022).
- Chapman, A.; Fujii, H.; Managi, S. Key Drivers for Cooperation toward Sustainable Development and the Management of CO2 Emissions: Comparative Analysis of Six Northeast Asian Countries. Sustainability 2018, 10, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Xu, B.; Lin, B. Regional differences in the CO2 emissions of China’s iron and steel industry: Regional heterogeneity. Energy Policy 2016, 88, 422–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ehrlich, P.R.; Holdren, J.P. Critique. Bull. At. Sci. 1972, 28, 16–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thomakos, D.D.; Alexopoulos, T.A. Carbon intensity as a proxy for environmental performance and the informational content of the EPI. Energy Policy 2016, 94, 179–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Frank, R.H.; Bernanke, B.S. Principles of Economics, 3rd ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 2005. [Google Scholar]
- Kondo, M. R&D dynamics of creating patents in the Japanese industry. Res. Policy 1999, 28, 587–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prodan, I. Influence of Research and Development Expenditures on Number of Patent Aplications: Selected Case Studies in OECD countries and Central Europe, 1981–2001. Appl. Econom. Int. Dev. 2005, 5, 4. [Google Scholar]
- Hall, B.H.; Griliches, Z.; Hausman, J.A. Patents and R&D: Is there a lag? (No. w1454); National Bureau of Economic Research: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nakamura, Y. Effectiveness of Japan’s government sponsored research project—The case of a Real World Computing Program. Int. J. Entrep. Innov. Manag. 2002, 2, 100–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brunner Meier, S.B.; Cohen, M.A. Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2003, 45, 278–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Commission, P. Pakistan 2025-One Nation-One Vision; Ministry of Planning, Development & Reform, Government of Pakistan: Islamabad, Pakistan, 2015.
- Dinan, D. Ever Closer Union: An Introduction to European Integration; Palgrave MacMillan Ltd.: London, UK, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Lanzi, E.; Verdolini, E.; Haščič, I. Efficiency-improving fossil fuel technologies for electricity generation: Data selection and trends. Energy Policy 2011, 39, 7000–7014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Raza, M.Y.; Lin, B. Energy efficiency and factor productivity in Pakistan: Policy perspectives. Energy 2022, 247, 123461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, B.; Raza, M.Y. Analysis of energy security indicators and CO2 emissions. A case from a developing economy. Energy 2020, 200, 117575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Subhan, Q.A.; Mahmood, T.; Sattar, A. Innovation and economic development: A Case of Small and Medium Enterprises in Pakistan. Pak. Econ. Soc. Rev. 2014, 52, 159–174. [Google Scholar]
Variable | Determinant | Description | Item |
---|---|---|---|
EI | Energy Intensity Consumption | TEC: Total energy consumption from total GDP | |
SUB | Substitutions (total mixed energy) | FFC: Fossil fuel Consumption | |
CI | Carbon Intensity effect | CO2Es: Carbon dioxide emissions | |
Research &Development Investment | R&D: Innovations and analysis | ||
Generation of green patents | PATENT: New technologies for the development of a green environment | ||
AC | Activity effect | AC: change in emissions due to per capita change in GDP |
Variables | Unit | Sources | Mean | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|---|---|
CO2E | Mt | Statistical Review of World Energy | 133.962 | 668.067 |
FFC | Mt | Statistical Review of World Energy, Pakistan Economic survey | 30,362.8 | 76,490,474.48 |
TEC | Mt | Pakistan Economic survey; Pakistan Energy Yearbook | 30,604.346 | 78,038,539.91 |
GDP | Rs. Billion | World Bank; Pakistan Economic survey | 16,914.921 | 179,577,674.1 |
C R | % of GDP No. of Patent applications | World Bank WIPO database | 0.0024412 18.2381 | 0.002012 213.613 |
Year | ∆PGDP | ∆PEI | ∆PSub | ∆PCI | ∆PC | ∆PR | Ptot |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1993–1997 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
1998–2002 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2003–2007 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
2008–2012 | 160.03082 | −127.47303 | −0.58796 | −32.12633 | −317.69252 | 1416.4214 | 6.5 |
2013–2017 | 737.79012 | −7796.4386 | −3.20496 | 7806.6739 | −8820.6716 | 199.6246 | 1.133 |
1993–2017 | 825.9516 | −1477.2918 | −0.55370 | 1195.57503 | −1142.2694 | 2198.2692 | 17 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Raza, M.Y.; Chen, Y.; Tang, S. Assessing the Green R&D Investment and Patent Generation in Pakistan towards CO2 Emissions Reduction with a Novel Decomposition Framework. Sustainability 2022, 14, 6435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116435
Raza MY, Chen Y, Tang S. Assessing the Green R&D Investment and Patent Generation in Pakistan towards CO2 Emissions Reduction with a Novel Decomposition Framework. Sustainability. 2022; 14(11):6435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116435
Chicago/Turabian StyleRaza, Muhammad Yousaf, Yingchao Chen, and Songlin Tang. 2022. "Assessing the Green R&D Investment and Patent Generation in Pakistan towards CO2 Emissions Reduction with a Novel Decomposition Framework" Sustainability 14, no. 11: 6435. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116435