Next Article in Journal
An Artificial-Immune-System-Based Algorithm Enhanced with Deep Reinforcement Learning for Solving Returnable Transport Item Problems
Next Article in Special Issue
Life Cycle Assessments of Circular Economy in the Built Environment—A Scoping Review
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Measurement, Spatiotemporal Evolution, and Spatial Correlation Analysis of High-Quality Development in the Manufacturing Industry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transition to a Sustainable Circular Plastics Economy in The Netherlands: Discourse and Policy Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Sustainable Circular Economy Strategies: An Analysis of Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Reporting

by
Julia Romano Sanches
1,
Adriana Hofmann Trevisan
1,
Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles
1,
Camila Gonçalves Castro
1,2,
Roberta Souza Piao
3,
Henrique Rozenfeld
1 and
Janaina Mascarenhas
1,*
1
Department of Production Engineering, São Carlos School of Engineering, University of São Paulo, Av. Trabalhador São Carlense, 400, São Carlos 13566-590, SP, Brazil
2
Federal Institute of Education, Science, and Technology of Minas Gerais, Campus Congonhas, Av. Michael Pereira de Souza, 3007, Congonhas 36415-000, MG, Brazil
3
Department of Production Engineering Polytechnic School, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Luciano Gualberto, n.1380, São Paulo 05508-010, SP, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(10), 5808; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105808
Submission received: 23 March 2022 / Revised: 3 May 2022 / Accepted: 7 May 2022 / Published: 11 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Circular Economy for Sustainable Development)

Abstract

:
Corporate Sustainability Reporting provides essential data for academic and empirical research on sustainability and the still-growing adoption of the circular economy by companies. Despite the wide attention that the circular economy receives from the academy, a systematization and hierarchy of the strategies that embrace the sustainable circular economy are still necessary. In addition, there is a limitation of research on the analysis of Corporate Sustainability Reporting in emerging economies. In this study, fifty sustainable circular economy strategies emerged from a systematic literature review, arranged among nine categories. The differential of the identified strategies is the expansion of strategies for a sustainable circular economy vision. Then, 51 Corporate Sustainability Reporting from 17 multinational companies operating in Brazil in 2016, 2018 and 2020 were analyzed to identify companies’ adoption of these strategies. The Corporate Sustainability Reporting analysis results suggest that companies operating in Brazil are directing significant efforts toward a sustainable circular economy. Based on these two results and the theory of business process management, we proposed the Business Process for Sustainable Circular Economy framework.

1. Introduction

The circular economy (CE) is presented as a sustainable alternative to the prevailing linear economic system [1] of “extract, produce, and dispose” [2]. It acts at all three levels: micro-level (products, companies, consumers), meso-level (eco-industrial parks), and macro level (city, region, nation)—aiming at achieving sustainable development [3,4]. CE reveals itself as a fundamental systemic change. For this reason, the concept of “sustainable circular economy (SCE)” is adopted in this study, which makes the caveat that a CE should prioritize social well-being, environmental quality and economic prosperity and thus be an SCE [5].
In Brazil, despite an “institutional void” at the macro level [6], in which public policies and government regulations to encourage companies’ transition to circularity are lacking, some players are seeking to establish targets for this transition. The Brazilian Business Council for Sustainable Development, for example, has established as a goal the consolidation of the circular economy in the country by 2050 so that, by 2030, the effective circular design of products and services is advocated [7]. Oliveira et al. [8] point out that for the diffusion and adoption of circularity principles in Brazil, studies that contemplate sectoral diagnoses are necessary. An additional challenge, however, is the scarce literature of examples of the adoption of circular strategies not only in developing economies [3] and on which perspectives the strategies are incorporated to achieve sustainable development.
Corporate Sustainability Reporting (CS Reporting) is currently the standard for corporate communication of their sustainable initiatives and goals. For the development of CS Reporting companies must strictly follow the methodologies of the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and Integrated Reporting (IR). The mandatory nature of these methodologies provides comparability, universality and relevance of the reported data [9], serving as an instrument of accountability for sustainability initiatives and results [10]. CS Reporting is, therefore, in its entirety, a useful and strategic source of information for academic and empirical research on the topic of sustainability and the still-growing adoption of the circular economy by companies [11].
Recently, CS Reporting has been research target regarding circular economy data analysis [12,13,14,15,16,17]. Some of these researches investigated firms by regions, such as Dagiliene et al. [13], which investigated 226 manufacturing firms in the European Union, and Marco-Fondevila et al. [15], which focused on 36 Spanish firms. Other research has done its investigations by sector, such as Upadhyay et al. [16], which focused on three of the five largest mining companies in the world. However, as highlighted by Navarrete-Oyarce et al. [18], analyses of CS Reporting from emerging economies are needed because of their undeniable role in global sustainable development.
In addition to what Navarrete-Oyarce et al. [18] highlighted, despite the wide attention that CE receives from academia, there is still a need for systematization and prioritization of the concepts that embrace the SCE, in particular, of its strategies [4]. The absence of research in this direction entails the difficulty of implementation or a fragile implementation of CE. Developing countries must be able to adhere to the strategies of the SCE that is already becoming increasingly present in the European community and China. A critical analysis of the main strategies adopted in the European community should be carried out, taking into account the economic situation and consumption patterns of developing countries [19]. Understanding these particularities can contribute to establishing public policies and sectoral agreements that encourage sustainable development.
Given the two gaps presented so far, (1) need to systematize and prioritize SCE strategies; and (2) lack of analyses on CE in CS Reporting from emerging countries like Brazil, the research questions of this study are:
RQ1: What are the main strategies of a sustainable circular economy?
RQ2: Which of these strategies are present in the CS Reporting of companies operating in Brazil?
The objectives are: (1) identify and analyze circular and sustainable strategies presented in the academic literature; (2) analyze the adoption of SCE strategies practiced by multinational companies operating in Brazil; (3) propose a framework on SCE in companies’ processes to facilitate business decision-making.
To achieve “objective 1”, a meta-analysis of seminal papers that reviewed circular and sustainable strategies in the academic literature was conducted. Then, to achieve “objective 2”, the adoption of these strategies by multinational companies operating in Brazil was analyzed based on the reports made in their CS Reporting. To achieve “objective 3”, a sustainable circular economy (SCE) framework was proposed—the BP4SCE framework, which provides SCE categories and strategies within companies’ processes. The framework was built based on the results achieved in the first two objectives and also on business process management theory [20]. It was formulated to help companies structure their activities to achieve more excellent sustainable value through their strategies and practices, which is similar to Porter’s value chain model [21] and also the APQC Process Classification Framework (PCF) [22].
This article is organized into four other sections. Section 2 presents the materials and methods adopted for the collection and analysis of primary and secondary data and the concepts for building the framework. Section 3 presents the results and discussions of the study, comprising a descriptive analysis of the selected articles, the SCE strategies, and the results of the CS Reporting analyses. The framework developed is presented in Section 4. Finally, Section 5 highlights the article’s contributions, limitations and future research paths.

2. Materials and Methods

This article employs three research approaches, as can be seen in the complete dark blue boxes in Figure 1. To achieve “objective 1”, a systematic literature review was carried out to select sustainable circular strategies (Section 2.1). Then, to achieve “objective 2”, the adoption of these strategies by multinational companies operating in Brazil was identified based on a content analysis of CS Reporting (Section 2.2). These two approaches answered the two research questions. Thus, both results enabled the development of the BP4SCE framework, reaching “objective 3”. The description of the framework construction is summarized in Section 2.3, as employed by Liu et al. [23].

2.1. Systematic Literature Review

The systematic literature review (SLR) approach was employed in this paper to originate a set of strategies that operationalize a sustainable circular economy. The literature in this paper was searched and selected following the rules of Briner and Denyer [24]. The approach locates existing studies and selects and analyzes them following a rigorous and well-defined research protocol.

2.1.1. Identifying and Refining the Review Scope

Firstly, a specific set of words relevant to the field of research was defined, namely circular economy strategies and/or sustainability practices of organizations. Then those words were applied in previous works that carried out a literature review on these topics. For this, three sets of words were inserted in the search string. The “AND” operator was used to find each contribution. The “OR” operator was used to search for alternative words from each other [25]. Examples of these words are: “circular economy strategy”/“sustainability practice”, “business”, and “systematic literature review”. The original search string employed is provided below:
TITLE-ABS-KEY ((“circular economy strategy*” OR “circular economy practice*” OR “circular strategy*” OR “circular practice*” OR “circularity practice*” OR “circularity strategy*” OR “sustainability practice*” OR “sustainability strategy*” OR “sustainable practice*” OR “sustainable strategy*”) AND (“business*” OR “corporate*” OR “corporation*” OR “compan*” OR “industr*” OR “entrepreneurial” OR “enterprise”) AND (“systematic literature review*” OR “SLR” OR “literature review*” OR “systematic review*”))
The search for studies was conducted in Scopus and Web of Science. Published journal articles and conference papers were included to mitigate publication bias [24]. Only publications written in English were included. Searches of the material were conducted in June 2021.

2.1.2. Selecting Studies

The selection process found 305 studies in the Scopus database and 228 in the Web of Science, 179 of which were duplicates. The remaining 354 articles were analyzed, and after reading the abstracts, 110 articles were selected for the full-text reading phase. The reading of the full articles resulted in the selection of 35 articles considered suitable for the qualitative content analysis process. Only articles that reviewed the literature on circular and/or sustainable strategies were included. Articles that focused on a single sector (e.g., fashion) were not selected for analysis.

2.1.3. Literature Analysis and Synthesis

The descriptive analysis and content analysis steps were employed to review the articles. The descriptive analysis aimed to reveal research trends among the 35 articles: the journals that publish the most articles, the articles published each year, and the most frequent keywords were analyzed. In addition, the 35 articles were identified according to the theoretical perspective they addressed: circular economy or sustainability. The results are presented in Section 3.
The second part of this literature review consists of qualitative content analysis following the precepts of Miles; Huberman; Saldaña [26], in which the revised articles were coded to extract CE and sustainability strategies. The two-cycle coding method was applied in the coding process. The MAXQDA software, a tool that allows coding, categorizing and analyzing qualitative research data [27], was used in the analysis.

2.1.4. Coding Process

All selected articles were coded in the first coding cycle following Miles; Huberman; Saldaña’s [26] in-vivo coding process. The first coding cycle resulted in 519 in-vivo codes of textual segment reporting strategies. Prior to the second cycle of coding, the codes were thoroughly analyzed and merged to improve the quality of the identified data.
In the second round of coding, the codes were refined, and consequently, patterns were revealed. Grouping of similar in-vivo codes was performed, and then a common title was defined, as can be seen in Table 1. This step resulted in the 50 identified SCE strategies that were organized into nine categories, created from analysis of the revealed patterns.

2.2. CS Reporting Content Analysis

The reporting database was built containing 51 CS Reporting from 17 companies operating in Brazil from different industries, from the years 2016, 2018 and 2020. All companies were listed on the Brazilian Stock Exchange, B3 (Table 2).
CS Reporting was selected from 2016 by virtue of the fact that the CE100 Brazil program, which acts to transition the circular economy in Brazil, was launched in October 2015 [28], representing the milestone of CS in the country. Two years later, in 2018, the first document on the circular economy in Brazil was published by the National Confederation of Industry [29]. Finally, the year 2020 refers to the last year of publication found in the period in which CS Reporting was analyzed.
All selected CS Reporting followed Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) precepts. GRI is an international organization that develops sustainability reporting guidelines worldwide [30], acting as a facilitator for the dissemination of sustainability performance [31].
The GRI versions followed by the selected companies were the G4 Guidelines (G4) and the GRI Standards (Std)—see Table 2. The G4 was a guidelines version published in 2013. Moreover, the GRI Sustainability Reporting Standards (GRI Standards) were the first global standards for sustainability reporting, published in 2016 [30].
The GRI Standards (abbreviation Std in Table 2), the version most widely followed by CS Reporting, are composed of “Universal Standards” and “Topic-specific Standards”. As specific, there are three series: GRI 200 for the “Economic” pillar, divided among seven standards (GRI 201, GRI 202, GRI 203, etc.), GRI 300 for the “Environmental” pillar, divided among eight standards (GRI 301, GRI 302, GRI 303, etc.), and GRI 400 for the “Social” pillar, divided among 19 standards (GRI 401, GRI 402, GRI 403, etc.) [32].
Initially, the 51 CS Reporting and the strategies originating from the SLR were entered into a new MAXQDA project for qualitative and quantitative content analysis [26]. A full reading of the CS Reporting was performed to identify the strategies from the textual, graphic, and/or image segments provided in these documents. For each strategy found, the document was coded only once, even if the same strategy appeared several times in the CS Reporting.
In cases of strategies with the word “reduce”, for example, “Reducing water consumption”, only results where there was, in fact, a reduction in consumption compared to the previous year were coded, since the CS Reporting inform, almost always in tables, results referring to the year of analysis and two previous years.
In the case of data in which specific actions of the company by countries where it operates were commented on, only those referring to Brazil were analyzed. For example, in the JBS CS Reporting, there are highlights of the units in Brazil, the United States, and Canada.

2.3. Building the Structure of Conceptual Framework

The framework proposed in this research is designed to facilitate business decision-making in the transition to circularity by providing SCE strategies organized according to companies’ processes. It guides how companies should employ their SCE strategies in their processes, helping in visualizing these processes and their responsible parties. The framework proposal is one of the ways found to answer the two research questions.
Despite the availability of frameworks for CE in the academic literature (e.g., the framework developed by Guzzo et al. [33]), there is still a lack of frameworks related to SCE, especially linking to operational processes. An example framework for SCE was recently developed by Velenturf [34] to integrate a sustainable circular economy into offshore wind energy. In contrast, the framework proposed in this research is theoretically based on business process management [20], as well as Morais et al. [35], Bernardo; Galina; Pádua [36] and Rentes et al. [37], and mirrors the focus on internal company activities and processes given by models, such as Porter’s value chain [21], and frameworks, such as the APQC Process Classification Framework (PCF) [22].
Following a hypothetical deductive methodological approach, the BP4SCE was built based on the knowledge generated from the SCE strategies identified and, afterwards, from the empirical knowledge generated from the content analysis of CS Reporting from 17 companies operating in Brazil. This process was employed to verify if the theoretical and practical perspectives ensure the structural elements of the framework. This approach is similar to previous studies that proposed frameworks. For example, Bocken et al. [38] built their framework based on the literature review and demonstrated its validity using practical examples. Kristoffersen et al. [39] proposed the Smart CE framework based on a theory and practice review approach. After the theoretical phase, they identified and mapped examples from practice to validate and further develop the framework. As a typical hypothetical deductive work, after we built the framework and verified its applicability, future works must empirically evaluate, validate or refute our proposal [40,41,42].

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Descriptive Analysis

As shown in Table 3, the research topic covered in this article has been attracting increasing interest since 2018. The first two relevant papers were published in 2014. Sustainability Switzerland and Journal of Cleaner Production published the most papers among the journals, with five each. Sustainable Production and Consumption and Business Strategy and The Environment published two each. In all, these journals published 14 papers out of the 35 selected. All the other journals published a single article, such as the Journal of Industrial Ecology, Resources Conservation and Recycling, Benchmarking, and others.
Among the 35 selected articles, 20 conducted their literature reviews with the circular economy theoretical perspective. The first year of publication of this set of articles is 2018 (2 articles). After that, there was a constancy of SLR publication of circular strategies, with publications in 2019 (7 articles), 2020 (4 articles), and 2021 (7 articles). The other 15 articles conducted their literature reviews with the sustainability perspective. The first year of publication of this set of articles is 2014 (2 articles), followed by 2015 (2 articles), 2016 (1 article), 2017 (1 article), 2018 (2 articles), 2020 (4 articles), and 2021 (3 articles). Table 4 shows the authors among the theoretical perspectives.
The co-occurrence of all keywords in the set of articles from each theoretical perspective was examined. Keyword networks were constructed based on keywords that appear at least three times in an article. In the circular economy article set, Figure 2a shows the 12 keywords identified and the connections between them. In the sustainability article set, Figure 2b shows the four keywords identified and the connections between them. It is possible to identify that sustainability and sustainable development are recurrent topics in the CE literature. On the other hand, the circular economy is not a recurring keyword in the sustainability literature. In both figures, it is possible to identify that the use of sustainability is more recent than sustainable development.

3.2. Sustainable Circular Economy (SCE) Strategies

The SCE strategies were grouped in nine different categories, namely Products and Materials (PM), Production and Operations (PO), Digitalization (DI), Logistics and Transportation (LT), Stakeholders’ Networks (SN), Environmental Management (EM), Business Model (BM), Environmental Compliance (EC), Social Responsibility (SR). The description of each category is presented as follows:

3.2.1. Products and Materials (PM)

The strategies gathered in this category act on product design, which can encompass the development of product-service systems [33], packaging development [43] and choice of new materials [44,45]. To make them sustainable, it is necessary to consider aspects such as multiple cycles of product use [44], their environmental particularities [46] and life cycle extension for longer longevity [47].
Twelve strategies make up the Products and Materials category (Table 5). Among these strategies, R’s strategies are the most popular in the CE literature [48], heavily employed during product design [33] and can be considered as fundamental to achieving sustainable products. However, they should not be considered as the only strategies that can be adopted. It is noteworthy that, although authors have expanded the R’s (e.g., Potting et al. [49] proposes 9R’s), the meta-analysis identified only six classic R’s that actually target the product design level that was therefore grouped into this category. They are: PM8—Reducing materials consumption; PM9—Reusing products and materials; PM10—Repairing and maintaining products; PM11—Refurbishing or remanufacturing products; and PM12—Recycling products and materials.
In the circular economy literature, all 20 papers mention at least 1 of the 12 identified strategies, totalling 147 coded segments. In the sustainability literature, 11 of the 15 papers mentioned at least 1 of the 12 strategies (totalling 45 coded segments), with the exception of PM3—Designing products for upgradability and PM7—Offering customization and made to order, which were not reported by any of the papers from this theoretical perspective. One difference that stands out between the theoretical perspectives is that the circular economy literature has a strong tendency to suggest the strategies that encompass the R’s, as illustrated by the strategy PM12—Recycling products and materials, which was cited by 17 circular economy articles but only by 5 sustainability articles.

3.2.2. Production and Operations (PO)

The strategies gathered in this category address industrial production processes. Sustainable production requires the incorporation of strategies associated with principles such as cleaner production and eco-efficiency [51,62,73], achieved by minimizing the use of natural resources or energy and properly treating emissions and waste [55], in order to achieve environmental performance [58] and reduced operating costs [69].
Eight strategies make up the Production and Operations category (Table 6). Reduction strategies stand out in this category, especially reducing gas emissions (PO2), energy consumption (PO3), water consumption (PO4) and reducing waste generation (PO5). Strategies in this category are more representative in the sustainability literature, as 13 of 15 papers mention at least 1 of the 8 identified strategies (totalling 32 coded segments). The only exception is OP9—Implementing composting, which was not mentioned by any of the articles from this theoretical perspective. In the circular economy literature, 15 of 20 papers mention at least 1 of the 8 strategies identified, totalling 40 coded segments. The analysis by these theoretical perspectives reveals that in the sustainability literature, the classic strategy PO3—Reducing gas emissions is the most mentioned, as it is also one of the most mentioned in the EC literature, along with PO1—Consuming renewable energy.

3.2.3. Digitalization (DI)

The strategies gathered in this category address the adoption of digital technologies. Digitization is intrinsically connected to the paradigm of a more service-based economy [71]. Moreover, digitalization provides greater connectivity between actors in the circular ecosystem [76,77], and enables preventive maintenance of equipment or operating systems to reduce the likelihood of failure [63]. From the adoption of technologies such as IoT, it is possible to monitor the condition of products, helping to predict when it will be necessary to make a repair and maintenance, for example [54].
Three strategies make up the Digitalization category (Table 7). In the circular economy literature, 8 of 20 papers mention at least 1 of the 3 identified strategies, totalling 18 coded segments. In the sustainability literature, 3 of the 15 papers mention 1 of the 3 identified strategies, totalling 4 coded segments. The difference that stands out between the theoretical perspectives is that digitization strategies are more widespread in the circular economy literature.

3.2.4. Logistics and Transportation (LT)

The strategies gathered in this category address the areas of logistics and transportation. The need for sustainable logistics systems is met by the adoption of strategies such as reverse logistics, which is essential to fit a circular business model [48], as well as being a strategy that enables value reintegration [56]. The need for sustainable distribution systems is reinforced by a shift to more sustainable modes of transportation (e.g., electric) and route optimization (e.g., shared fleet) [60].
Three strategies make up the Logistics and Transportation category (Table 8). In the circular economy literature, 11 of 20 studies mention at least 1 of the 3 identified strategies (totalling 16 coded segments), with the exception of LT3—Reducing fuel consumption, which was not mentioned by any of the articles from this theoretical perspective. In the sustainability literature, 8 of the 15 papers mention at least 1 of the 3 identified strategies, totalling 14 coded segments. The analysis of the theoretical perspectives reveals that the reverse logistics strategy (LT1) is more widespread in the circular economy literature than in the sustainability literature.

3.2.5. Stakeholders’ Networks (SN)

The strategies gathered in this category address the relationship with stakeholders, such as suppliers, employees, industries, research institutes, and customers. A proactive approach with stakeholders is essential for social, economic, and environmental sustainability within business models for value creation and delivery [56].
Eight strategies make up the Stakeholder Networks category (Table 9). In the circular economy literature, 13 of 20 papers mention at least 1 of the 8 identified strategies, totalling 40 coded segments. In the sustainability literature, 11 of 15 papers mention at least 1 of the 8 identified strategies, totalling 38 coded segments. The analysis of the theoretical perspectives reveals that strategies linked to stakeholders are representative in both theories. While SN1—Evaluating suppliers using environmental criteria is the most mentioned strategy in the sustainability literature, SN7—Establishing industrial symbiosis is the most mentioned in the EC literature.

3.2.6. Environmental Management (EM)

The strategies gathered in this category address sustainable corporate management inside and outside the organization. To this end, the strategies rely on corporate governance structures [25] for resource, water, energy, and waste management [62,75], which directly enable internal environmental performance. Externally, the focus should be on concern for ecosystem regeneration [54] and conscious exploitation of natural resources, aiming to conserve natural environments [58].
Three strategies make up the Environmental Management category (Table 10). In the circular economy literature, 5 of 20 papers mention at least 1 of the 3 strategies identified, totalling 7 coded segments. In the sustainability literature, 10 of the 15 papers mention at least 1 of the 3 identified strategies, totalling 16 coded segments. The difference that stands out between the theoretical perspectives is that management strategies are more widespread in the sustainability literature.

3.2.7. Business Model (BM)

The strategies gathered in this category indicate what companies can do strategically in their business to incorporate circular principles. In a circular ecosystem, companies must rethink how they deliver value [55], adapting their portfolio and mode of operation in order to provide new products, solutions, or services [56]. Strategies in this category can influence the entire value chain, the relationships with stakeholders, and imply the adoption of all the other strategies listed for effective implementation.
Three strategies make up the Business Model category (Table 11). In the circular economy literature, 13 of 20 papers mention at least 1 of the 3 identified strategies, totalling 22 coded segments. In the sustainability literature, 6 of 15 papers mention at least 1 of the 3 identified strategies, totalling 8 coded segments. The analysis by theoretical perspectives reveals that the strategy of rethinking the business from a circular culture (BM1) is representative in both CE and sustainability. However, the products-as-a-service strategy (BM2) is more widespread in the circular economy literature.

3.2.8. Environmental Compliance (EC)

The strategies gathered in this category address the adequacy of products and processes in environmentally accepted aspects. Respecting and complying with environmental legislation is the first step towards compliance. Next, some tools can be adopted. LCA, for example, provides a robust analysis of a product’s life cycle, measuring resource consumption, environmental impacts, and waste disposal. Another tool that can support signalling at the product level is eco-labelling, dividing products into groups, such as “organic products”. In industrial processes, meanwhile, environmental certificates are essential tools for systematically managing environmental issues, such as ISO 14001, for example [51].
Four strategies make up the Environmental Compliance category (Table 12). In the circular economy literature, 5 of 20 papers mention at least 1 of the 4 identified strategies (totalling 13 coded segments), except EC2—Having eco-certification, which was not mentioned by any of the papers from this theoretical perspective. In the sustainability literature, 8 of the 15 papers mention at least 1 of the 4 identified strategies, totalling 12 coded segments. Except for EC2, the analysis by theoretical perspectives reveals that the strategies in the category are representative in both theories.

3.2.9. Social Responsibility (SR)

The strategies gathered in this category address respecting and attending to social issues. Diversity, health and safety, good labor relations, social inclusion, public relations, and ethical behavior [46,50] should be the focus of human resources sectors to effect social responsibility to their stakeholders.
Six strategies make up the Social Responsibility category (Table 13). Among the literature analyzed, only the sustainability literature mentions aspects linked to the social dimension. Of the 15 papers, 8 mentions at least 1 strategy of the 6 identified, totalling 37 coded segments. Although the category originated from the sustainability research field, the importance of including it in the set of strategies is evident since recent research has studied the importance of the social dimension for the circular economy and vice versa [1,79,80,81].

3.3. Current Adoption of SCE Strategies in Brazil

The analysis of CS Reporting reveals the occurrence of SCE strategies in companies operating in Brazil. From the qualitative and quantitative content analysis [26], 1206 occurrences of the strategies were identified in the 51 CS Reporting analyzed, with 355 records in 2016, 385 in 2018, and 466 in 2020. Table 14 presents the summary of the quantities of strategies by categories identified in the 17 companies analyzed.
In the table, the colors highlight the growth/decrease in the occurrence of strategies in each category at the individual company analysis level, considering the total number of strategies in each category. It is possible to see that the categories of Environmental Management and Social Responsibility are the two categories that the companies gave greater continuity in the adoption of total strategies throughout the analyzed period. For example, Altona showed a constancy in adopting strategies from both categories in 2016, 2018, and 2020. Business Model is the category with the fewest records found, and JBS, Renner and Whirlpool stand out with two strategies implemented. In the Products and Materials category, a category with median adoption of the strategies by the 17 companies, Renner stands out with a high increase in records of these strategies (the company in 2016 presented 2 records and increased to 9 in 2018 and 8 in 2020) and Weg that increased from 4 records in 2016 and 2018 to 7 records in 2020. The analyses of the strategies by categories are presented below.

3.3.1. Products and Materials (PM): Occurrences of Strategies

The 17 companies analyzed have adopted strategies from this category since 2016 (Table 15). The strategies most adopted by companies since 2016 are: PM9—Reusing products and materials (71% of companies) and PM12—Recycling products and materials (94% of companies). This expressiveness can be explained given that GRI has a specific standard for materials (GRI standard 301) and waste (GRI standard 306) within the environmental series. Organizations must report the raw materials or recycled materials used (301-2) and the waste destined for reuse and recycling (306-4) [32]. Furthermore, as widely recognized [43,46,51,56], during product design, design decisions are made that impact the generation and treatment of this waste, which PM9 and PM12 strategies have a high relationship.
Other highlights of the table are the strategies that gained attention from companies in 2020: PM1—Designing environmentally safe products, PM5—Using bio-based materials and PM6—Offering or using green packaging). The only strategy that was not adopted in any year analyzed is PM3—Designing products for upgradability.

3.3.2. Production and Operations (PO): Occurrences of Strategies

The 17 companies analyzed have adopted strategies from this category since 2016 (Table 16). The strategies referring to “reduce”, such as reducing emissions (PO2), energy consumption (PO3) and water (PO4), and waste generation (PO5), were coded when evidence was found that the ratio of consumption in the year of analysis was lower than the previous year. For example, Ambev consumed 2.43 L of water for each liter of beer produced in 2020, compared to 2.55 L consumed in 2019 [82]. Thus, there was a reduction in water consumption in the year of analysis when compared to the previous year. Given this, the number of companies that adopted the strategies varied unsteadily according to the analysis of the years, as is the case of PO3—Reducing energy consumption that went from 10 companies in 2016 to 6 in 2018 and 9 in 2020.
Other highlights of the table are the strategies most adopted by companies in 2020, such as PO1—Consuming renewable energy (94% of companies), PO4—Reducing water consumption (64% of companies), PO5—Reducing waste generation (59% of companies), and PO6—Reusing water (76% of companies). The GRI environmental series (GRI 300) brings GRI standards linked to energy (GRI 302), water (GRI 303), emissions (GRI 305), and waste (GRI 306). Organizations are required to report renewable energy consumption (302-1), energy consumption reduction (302-4), water capture and consumption sources (303-3 and 303-5), emissions reduction (305-5), and waste generated (306-3) [32]. The high occurrences of the strategies in 2020 suggest a relationship with the GRI Standards.

3.3.3. Digitalization (DI): Occurrences of Strategies

The 17 companies analyzed have been adopting the category’s strategies since 2016 (Table 17). All three strategies (DI1—Virtualizing products or processes, DI2—Establishing product traceability, and DI3—Monitoring and controlling process) gained attention from companies in 2020. However, more than half of the companies adopt virtualization (DI1) and monitoring (DI3), but only 3 companies attend to product traceability (DI2).

3.3.4. Logistics and Transportation (LT): Occurrences of Strategies

The 17 companies analyzed have been adopting the category’s strategies since 2016 (Table 18). The strategy LT1—Implementing reverse logistics systems gained the attention of the companies in 2020, which was adopted by 76% of the companies. LT3—Reducing fuel consumption, as well as the practices related to “reduce” from the PO category, was only coded when consumption was lower in the year of analysis. For example, Irani consumed 4,730,735.97 L of fuel (diesel and gasoline) in 2018, whereas in 2017 the consumption was 5,188,935.82 L [83]. However, this strategy was not adopted by any company in 2020.

3.3.5. Stakeholders’ Networks (SN): Occurrences of Strategies

The 17 companies analyzed have been adopting the category’s strategies since 2016 (Table 19). With the exception of strategies SN6—Enabling and incentivizing users to consume less and SN7—Establishing industrial symbiosis, 59% or more of the companies have adopted the category’s strategies by 2020.
Other highlights of the table are the strategies that gained attention from companies in 2020: SN4—Communicating circular issues to stakeholders (from 1 company in 2016 increased to 10 in 2020) and SN8—Training employees for ecological conduct (from 6 companies in 2016 increased to 15 in 2020). The growth of companies with explicit reporting on circular economy (SN4) may be a result of the popularization of CE, not only worldwide, but also in Brazil. The reports in CS Reporting are based on issues related to the R’s (reduce, reuse, and recycle), packaging, waste management, carbon-neutral, low environmental footprint products, the circularity of formulas, and plastics. The growth of SN8 suggests an increase in the concern of companies with regard to the behavior of their employees in environmental aspects.

3.3.6. Environmental Management (EM): Occurrences of Strategies

The 17 companies analyzed have been adopting the category’s strategies since 2016 (Table 20). The EM1—Establishing eco-friendly governance systems gained attention from companies in 2020. This result is due to the increase in the number of companies that created specific committees for sustainability issues. For example, Hering and Weg created their “Sustainability Committee” in 2020. At Hering, the committee meets monthly to address the issue, ensuring a systemic management of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) aspects [84]. According to Weg, the importance, complexity and dynamism of the sustainability/ESG theme drove the company in strengthening its governance processes [85].
Another highlight of the table is the constancy of adoption of the strategies EM2—Managing natural resources internally and EM3—Managing and conserving natural ecosystems by the companies in the analysis period, with EM2 being adopted by 100% of the companies in 2020.

3.3.7. Business Model (BM): Occurrences of Strategies

Some companies out of the 17 analyzed have adopted one of the three category strategies since 2016 (Table 21). Strategy BM1—Rethinking the business model from a circular culture gained attention from companies in 2020, which is also the most adopted by companies (47% of the companies). Renner, for example, has rethought its business model considering different aspects, from the store’s physical infrastructure to more circular products and raw materials [86].
Other highlights of the table is the only adoption of the BM2 strategy—Establishing product as a service systems in 2020. Whirlpool has a water purifier with a rental system, which includes maintenance service and filter change [87].

3.3.8. Environmental Compliance (EC): Occurrences of Strategies

The 17 companies analyzed have been adopting the category’s strategies since 2016 (Table 22). Except for EC4—Respecting legislations and policies, the other three strategies in the category became more adopted by companies in 2020. Of these, the environmental product certification strategy (EC3) is the one that has gained the most attention from companies when compared to 2016.

3.3.9. Social Responsibility (SR): Occurrences of Strategies

Most of the 17 companies analyzed have been adopting the category’s strategies since 2016 (Table 23). In 2020, 76% or more of the companies adopt the six strategies of the category, with 100% of the companies adopting strategies SR1—Establishing healthy working conditions, SR3—Providing diversity and work opportunities, SR4—Respecting and supporting the community, and SR5—Respecting and supporting the employees. The high adoption of the category’s strategies suggests a relationship with the GRI, since there are in the social series (GRI 400) specific standards related to employment (GRI 401), labor relations (GRI 402), occupational health and safety (GRI 403), diversity and equal opportunities (GRI 405), local communities (GRI 413) [32], among others.

3.3.10. SCE Strategies Adoption Summary

Overall, the analysis of the 51 CS Reporting for 2016, 2018, and 2020 indicates that multinational companies operating in Brazil are directing significant efforts towards a sustainable circular economy. In particular, the strategies of recycling, renewable energy consumption, internal resource management and social responsibility with employees, customers, and community were the ones that showed the highest adoption rates by companies (PM12, PO1, EM2, SR1, SR2, SR3, SR4, SR5). However, the results show that greater actions need to be taken regarding the offering of products as services (e.g., rental), designing products for upgradability, remanufacturing and reconditioning of products, as well as regarding the reduction of fuel consumption and incentives for users to minimize consumerism (BM2, PM3, PM11, LT3, SN6).
Gunarathne et al. [14] highlight in their CS Reporting analysis results a possible influence of the GRI Standards on corporate disclosures of Sri Lankan companies. As found by the authors, it is possible that the most found strategies in the CS Reporting of Brazilian companies are the influence of correlation with the GRI Standards.

4. Synthesis: The BP4SCE Framework

Based on the SCE categories and strategies that emerged in the systematic literature review, as well as the qualitative and quantitative analysis of CS Reporting from multinational companies operating in Brazil, the Business Process for Sustainable Circular Economy (BP4SCE) framework was developed. It mirrors Porter’s value chain model [21] and the APQC Process Classification Framework (PCF) [22].
As Figure 3 shows, the framework separates the categories of strategies to be implemented in the two levels of processes proposed by the APQC PCF, management and operational processes. The categories that should be explored by the operational processes are Business Model, Products and Materials, Production and Operations, and Logistics and Transportation. The management and support processes should focus on the categories of Environmental Management, Environmental Compliance, Digitalization, Stakeholders’ Networks, and Social Responsibility. The relationships between the categories can be vertical or horizontal. In other words, the categories within Management and Support Processes serve as a basis for the operational processes categories. Empirical examples of these relationships are given from the data available in the analyzed CS Reporting.
The strategies in the Business Model category can influence the entire value chain, the relationships with stakeholders, and imply the adoption of all the other strategies listed for effective implementation. Natura, for example, seeking to achieve circularity in its products (BM1), established a reverse logistics program (LT1) that, with a solid relationship with consumers (SR2), collects empty packaging of its brands at its points of sale (SN3), destining them to a partnership with the company TerraCycle (SN2), which follows the recycling process (PM12) [88].
The categories Products and Materials, Production and Operations and Logistics and Transportation, according to the explicit indication of their names, should be explored by the operational processes within the companies as Develop and Manage Products and Service and Deliver Physical Products. Renner, through the reuse (PM9) and recycling (PM12) of 673 kg of jeans leftovers from the production process, developed jeans free of synthetic fibers and made with certified cotton (PM1), produced with 75% of the water consumed coming from reuse (PO6) [86]. The R’s strategies (such as reuse and recycling) are not addressed separately in CS Reporting but rather as outcomes of their product development processes and industrial activities.
The Environmental Management and Environmental Compliance categories should be explored together by management and support processes, which vertically relate to operational process categories. Whirlpool [87], Altona [89] and CSN [90] highlight that to generate less impact on the environment and reduce the environmental footprint, it is necessary to manage the use of natural resources (EM2) in conjunction with the use of mechanisms such as ISO 14001—Environmental Management Systems (EC2). Such actions drive reduced natural resource consumption (PM8, PO3, PO4), reduced air emissions (PO2) and reduced waste disposal (PO5) [89].
Digitalization should also be explored by management and support processes, such as Manage Information Technology. As a way of managing natural ecosystems (EM3), Suzano uses technologies to monitor (DI3) climate conditions, carbon capture, use of natural resources, forest health, and the presence of weeds. Through this information, the teams identify when, where, and whether there will be positive or negative impacts on the company’s future productivity [91].
Another type of relationship can be found vertically between Digitalization and Products and Materials. Hering, for example, with automated equipment (DI1) and a Business Intelligence (BI) program, can monitor and analyze (DI3) the dyeing data and reduce the consumption of inputs (PM8) [84]. However, despite the implementations, digitalization strategies deserve greater attention given the digital transformation movement, which will certainly impact all management and operational processes of companies.
Also in the management and support processes, the Stakeholders’ Networks and Social Responsibility categories together play an essential role to be explored by processes such as Develop and Manage Human Capital. Weg [85], seeking to promote a healthy and safe environment for its employees (SR1), is based on a workplace safety policy to structure programs that promote awareness, sensitization, and dissemination of a sustainable organizational culture (SN8).
Another type of relationship can be found vertically between Stakeholders’ Networks and Logistics and Transportation. Through a collaboration with customers (SN3), Irani carried out the reverse logistics (LT1) of 6223.7 tons of corrugated cardboard scraps in 2020 [92]. The empirical data exemplifies how the strategies and categories of the management and support process and operating process are connected horizontally and vertically.

5. Conclusions

This study carried out three research approaches, which allowed the achievement of the objectives listed in Section 1. Initially, a systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out, where the articles were analyzed by the qualitative coding method. From this approach, fifty SCE strategies arranged in nine categories were identified. The second approach was a qualitative and quantitative content analysis of 51 CS Reporting from companies operating in Brazil, referring to the years 2016, 2018 and 2020, to identify the adoption of SCE strategies. The third and final approach comprised the construction of the conceptual framework—the Business Process for Sustainable Circular Economy (BP4SCE), which originated from the discussions generated in the first two research approaches and mirrors Porter’s value chain model [21] and the APQC Process Classification Framework (PCF) [22].
The differentiator of the strategies identified in SLR is the expansion of the strategies to the sustainable circular economy (SCE) vision. The CE literature is primarily biased towards R’s strategies. The sustainability literature is mainly biased towards emissions, water, energy, and waste. As presented, the list of SCE strategies encompasses both biases to achieve SCE. Therefore, the list itself is important for practitioners to adhere to the strategies and for academics to research the topic further. The organization of these strategies into categories is also a differentiator, as it unifies the academic view with the process management view.
The investigation of the adoption of SCE strategies in Brazilian CS Reporting was unprecedented. The analysis indicates that multinational companies operating in Brazil are directing significant efforts toward an SCE. However, more efforts need to be directed within categories such as Business Model, where low adoption of the strategy was found over the analyzed period. Furthermore, in Products and Materials, there is a median adoption of strategies by companies. These results indicate that, to achieve the effective circular design of products and services by 2030 in Brazil [7], there is still room for the country to grow in infrastructure, market and policies aimed at SCE. CS Reporting is the only and main database on the companies analyzed in this research and is an important means of diagnosing SCE strategies.
The proposed BP4SCE framework is unique. It integrates the circular economy and sustainability perspective into the companies’ process view, which is built upon the most widely used process framework, the PCF. The framework’s purpose is to facilitate business decision-making in the transition to circularity by providing SCE strategies organized according to companies’ processes. Therefore, it guides how companies should employ their SCE strategies in their processes, helping to visualize these processes and the people responsible for them. The framework also has high potential to assist in reporting SCE data in CS Reporting. The process view can be an important form of communication between sustainability departments, which are responsible for CS Reporting, and other company departments.
A limitation of the work was to investigate seminal SLR on SCE strategies. Future research needs to advance on new strategies that were not included in these SLRs, such as digitization strategies. Only three were found, but this category should be expanded. In CS Reporting, evidence of the adoption of strategies was sought, but the consistency of adoption by companies is still unclear. Do companies cancel the adoption of some strategies, or do they simply stop reporting? Future research analyzing current and new CS Reporting is needed, so that it is possible to identify if there is a constancy of adoption and if a sustainable circular economy is, in fact, growing in Brazil. Finally, although the framework developed is firmly based on academic and practical results, practitioners and unbiased experts have not validated it. Future research can be carried out to empirically evaluate and systematize the correlations and dependencies between strategies within companies’ processes.

Author Contributions

J.R.S. and J.M. were responsible for the conceptualization of the paper. J.R.S. and A.H.T. were in responsible for the data curation and investigation operationalization. The methodology was designed and written by J.R.S., J.M. and A.H.T. The original draft was created by J.R.S. The validation and formal analysis was realized by B.M.R.P.S., C.G.C., R.S.P. and H.R. The paper review & editing was done by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES); and the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), under the process 2019/23655-9.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

CS Reporting is available on the websites of the analyzed companies. This data can be found here: Altona [https://ri.altona.com.br/pages/informacoes_financeiras/balanco_anual_relatorio_de_sustentabilidade/index.php (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Ambev [https://ri.ambev.com.br/relatorios-publicacoes/relatorios-anuais-e-sustentabilidade/ (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Braskem [https://www.braskem.com.br/relatorioanual (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; CSN [https://ri.csn.com.br/sustentabilidade/relatorios/ (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Duratex [https://www.dex.co/sustentabilidade/relatorio-anual-e-de-sustentabilidade (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Hering [https://ri.ciahering.com.br/cia-hering/sustentabilidade/ accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Irani [https://irani.com.br/praticas-sustentaveis/relatorio-de-sustentabilidade/ (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; JBS [https://jbs.com.br/sustentabilidade/ras/relatorios/ (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; M. Dias Branco [https://mdiasbranco.com.br/sustentabilidade/relatorio-anual-integrado/ (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Natura [https://www.natura.com.br/relatorio-anual (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Ouro Fino [https://www.ourofinosaudeanimal.com/sustentabilidade/relato-de-sustentabilidade/ (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Portobello [https://www.portobello.com.br/sustentabilidade (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Raia Drogasil [https://rd.com.br/sustentabilidade/relatorio-de-sustentabilidade/ (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Renner [http://lojasrenner.mzweb.com.br/a-companhia/relatorio-anual/ (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Suzano [https://www.suzano.com.br/sustentabilidade/ (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Weg [https://www.weg.net/institutional/BR/pt/sustainability (accessed on 10 September 2021)]; Whirlpool [https://www.whirlpool.com.br/pagina/relatorio-de-sustentabilidade/ (accessed on 10 September 2021)].

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank The Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES); and The São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), for financially supporting this research, under the process 2019/23655-9. The opinions, hypotheses, conclusions and recommendations expressed in this material are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of CAPES and FAPESP.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BP4SCEBusiness Process for Sustainable Circular Economy
CECircular Economy
CS ReportingCorporate Sustainability Reporting
GRIGlobal Reporting Initiative
IRIntegrated Reporting
SSustainability
SLRSystematic Literature Review
SASBSustainability Accounting Standards Board
SCESustainable Circular Economy

References

  1. Mies, A.; Gold, S. Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 321, 128960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Towards the Circular Economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition; Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK, 2013; Volume 40, pp. 201–205. [Google Scholar]
  3. Ghisellini, P.; Cialani, C.; Ulgiati, S. A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Velenturf, A.P.M.; Purnell, P. Principles for a sustainable circular economy. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 1437–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jabbour, C.J.C.; Seuring, S.; de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L.; Jugend, D.; De Camargo Fiorini, P.; Latan, H.; Izeppi, W.C. Stakeholders, innovative business models for the circular economy and sustainable performance of firms in an emerging economy facing institutional voids. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 264, 110416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. CEBDS. Conselho Empresarial Brasileiro para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável Visão 2050—Planejando o Brasil Pós-Pandemia. 2021. Available online: https://cebds.org/publicacoes/visao-2050/#.YnlZ-ujMLrc (accessed on 5 January 2022).
  8. de Oliveira, F.R.; dos Santos, R.F.; França, S.L.B.; Rangel, L.A.D. Strategies and challenges for the circular economy: A case study in Portugal and a panorama for Brazil. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2020, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. CEBDS. Conselho Empresarial Brasileiro para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Guia de Comunicação e Sustentabilidade. 2020. Available online: https://biblioteca.cebds.org/guia-de-comunicacao-sustentabilidade (accessed on 5 January 2022).
  10. CEBDS. Conselho Empresarial Brasileiro para o Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Tendências e Desafios da Integração de Informações Financeiras e de Sustentabilidade: Experiências de Empresas e Especialistas do Mercado Brasileiro. 2014. Available online: https://cebds.org/publicacoes/tendencias-e-desafios-da-integracao-de-informacoes-financeiras-e-de-sustentabilidade-experiencias-de-empresas-e-especialistas-do-mercado-brasileiro/#.Ynlcy-jMLrc (accessed on 5 January 2022).
  11. Barnabè, F.; Nazir, S. Investigating the interplays between integrated reporting practices and circular economy disclosure. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2020, 70, 2001–2031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Calzolari, T.; Genovese, A.; Brint, A. The adoption of circular economy practices in supply chains—An assessment of European Multi-National Enterprises. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 312, 127616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dagiliene, L.; Frendzel, M.; Sutiene, K.; Wnuk-Pel, T. Wise managers think about circular economy, wiser report and analyze it. Research of environmental reporting practices in EU manufacturing companies. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 274, 121968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gunarathne, N.; Wijayasundara, M.; Senaratne, S.; Kanchana, P.D.K.; Cooray, T. Uncovering corporate disclosure for a circular economy: An analysis of sustainability and integrated reporting by Sri Lankan companies. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 787–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marco-Fondevila, M.; Llena-Macarulla, F.; Callao-Gastón, S.; Jarne-Jarne, J.I. Are circular economy policies actually reaching organizations? Evidence from the largest Spanish companies. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 285, 124858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Upadhyay, A.; Laing, T.; Kumar, V.; Dora, M. Exploring barriers and drivers to the implementation of circular economy practices in the mining industry. Resour. Policy 2021, 72, 102037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kuo, L.; Chang, B.G. The affecting factors of circular economy information and its impact on corporate economic sustainability-Evidence from China. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 27, 986–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Navarrete-Oyarce, J.; Gallegos, J.A.; Moraga-Flores, H.; Gallizo, J.L. Integrated reporting as an academic research concept in the area of business. Sustainability 2021, 13, 7741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Corvellec, H.; Stowell, A.F.; Johansson, N. Critiques of the circular economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 2021, 26, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Smart, P.A.; Maddern, H.; Maull, R.S. Understanding business process management: Implications for theory and practice. Br. J. Manag. 2009, 20, 491–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Porter’s, V.C.M. What Is Value Chain. E-Commer. 1985, 1–13. Available online: http://www.dspmuranchi.ac.in/pdf/Blog/What%20is%20the%20First%20Mover%20Advantage.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2022).
  22. American Productivity & Quality Center (APQC). Cross Industry Process Classification Framework® (PCF), Version 7.2.1; APQC: Houston, TX, USA, 2018.
  23. Liu, Q.; Trevisan, A.H.; Yang, M.; Mascarenhas, J. A framework of digital technologies for the circular economy: Digital functions and mechanisms. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2022, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Briner, R.B.; Denyer, D. Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis as a Practice and Scholarship Tool. Oxford Handb. Evid.-Based Manag. 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Giuffrida, M.; Mangiaracina, R. Green practices for global supply chains in diverse industrial, geographical, and technological settings: A literature review and research agenda. Sustainability 2020, 12, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Miles, M.B.; Huberman, A.M.; Saldaña, J. Qualitative Data Analysis—A Methods Sourcebook; SAGE Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2014; ISBN 9781452257877. [Google Scholar]
  27. Oliveira, M.; Bitencourt, C.C.; dos Santos, A.C.M.Z.; Teixeira, E.K. Análise de Conteúdo Temática: Há uma diferença na utilização e nas vantagens oferecidas pelos softwares MAXQDA® e NVivo®? Rev. Adm. Univ. Fed. St. Maria 2016, 9, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. The Circular Economy 100. Ellen MacArthur Foundation Circular No Brasil; Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK, 2017; pp. 1–31. [Google Scholar]
  29. CNI. Circular Economy Opportunities and Challenges for the Brazilian Industry; National Confederation of Industry: Brasília, Brasil, 2018; ISBN 9788579571718. [Google Scholar]
  30. GRI. Empowering Sustainable Decisions: Gri’s Annual Report 2015–2016. 2016. Available online: https://www.globalreporting.org/media/zrjmyuzg/gri-annual-report-2015-2016.pdf (accessed on 13 December 2021).
  31. Halkos, G.; Nomikos, S. Corporate social responsibility: Trends in global reporting initiative standards. Econ. Anal. Policy 2021, 69, 106–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. GRI. Consolidated Set of Gri Sustainability Reporting Standards 2020. 2020. Available online: https://www.globalreporting.org/how-to-use-the-gri-standards/gri-standards-english-language/ (accessed on 13 December 2021).
  33. Guzzo, D.; Trevisan, A.H.; Echeveste, M.; Costa, J.M.H. Circular innovation framework: Verifying conceptual to practical decisions in sustainability-oriented product-service system cases. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Velenturf, A.P.M. A framework and baseline for the integration of a sustainable circular economy in offshore wind. Energies 2021, 14, 5540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. de Morais, R.M.; Kazan, S.; de Pádua, S.I.D.; Costa, A.L. An analysis of BPM lifecycles: From a literature review to a framework proposal. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2014, 20, 412–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bernardo, R.; Galina, S.V.R.; de Pádua, S.I.D. The BPM lifecycle: How to incorporate a view external to the organization through dynamic capability Ronaldo. Bus. Process Manag. J. 2017, 23, 155–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rentes, V.C.; de Pádua, S.I.D.; Coelho, E.B.; de Camargo Teixeira Cintra, M.A.; Ilana, G.G.F.; Rozenfeld, H. Implementation of a strategic planning process oriented towards promoting business process management (BPM) at a clinical research centre (CRC). Bus. Process Manag. J. 2019, 25, 707–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bocken, N.M.P.; de Pauw, I.; Bakker, C.; van der Grinten, B. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 2016, 33, 308–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Kristoffersen, E.; Blomsma, F.; Mikalef, P.; Li, J. The smart circular economy: A digital-enabled circular strategies framework for manufacturing companies. J. Bus. Res. 2020, 120, 241–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dresch, A.; Lacerda, D.P.; Antunes, J.A.V. Design Science Research: A Method for Science and Technology Advancement; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; ISBN 9783319073743. [Google Scholar]
  41. Blessing, L.T.M.; Chakrabarti, A. DRM, A Design Research Methodology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; ISBN 9781848825864. [Google Scholar]
  42. Yin, R.K. Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods; SAGE Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Volume 6, ISBN 9781433813757. [Google Scholar]
  43. Islam, S.; Karia, N.; Fauzi, F.B.A.; Soliman, M.S.M. A review on green supply chain aspects and practices. Manag. Mark. 2017, 12, 12–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Salvador, R.; Barros, M.V.; Freire, F.; Halog, A.; Piekarski, C.M.; De Francisco, A.C. Circular economy strategies on business modelling: Identifying the greatest influences. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 299, 126918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Karman, A. Towards Crystallizing Circular Business Models: A Critical Analysis of Literature. J. Sustain. Sci. Manag. 2020, 15, 175–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Malesios, C.; De, D.; Moursellas, A.; Dey, P.K.; Evangelinos, K. Sustainability performance analysis of small and medium sized enterprises: Criteria, methods and framework. Socioecon. Plan. Sci. 2021, 75, 100993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Stewart, R.; Niero, M. Circular economy in corporate sustainability strategies: A review of corporate sustainability reports in the fast-moving consumer goods sector. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2018, 27, 1005–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Khan, S.; Haleem, A. Investigation of circular economy practices in the context of emerging economies: A CoCoSo approach. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2021, 14, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Potting, J.; Hekkert, M.; Worrell, E.; Hanemaaijer, A. Circular Economy: Measuring innovation in the product chain—Policy report. PBL Neth. Environ. Assess. Agency 2017, 42. Available online: https://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/downloads/pbl-2016-circular-economy-measuring-innovation-in-product-chains-2544.pdf (accessed on 22 March 2022).
  50. John, L.; Narayanamurthy, G. Converging sustainability definitions: Industry independent dimensions. World J. Sci. Technol. Sustain. Dev. 2015, 12, 206–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Klewitz, J.; Hansen, E.G. Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 65, 57–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Lathabhavan, R. Sustainable business practices and challenges in Asia: A systematic review. Int. J. Organ. Anal. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Ingemarsdotter, E.; Jamsin, E.; Kortuem, G.; Balkenende, R. Circular strategies enabled by the internet of things-a framework and analysis of current practice. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  54. Konietzko, J.; Bocken, N.; Hultink, E.J. A tool to analyze, ideate and develop circular innovation ecosystems. Sustainability 2020, 12, 417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Kravchenko, M.; Pigosso, D.C.; McAloone, T.C. Towards the ex-ante sustainability screening of circular economy initiatives in manufacturing companies: Consolidation of leading sustainability-related performance indicators. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Martins, A.V.; Godina, R.; Azevedo, S.G.; Carvalho, H. Towards the development of a model for circularity: The circular car as a case study. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2021, 45, 101215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Mhatre, P.; Panchal, R.; Singh, A.; Bibyan, S. A systematic literature review on the circular economy initiatives in the European Union. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 26, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Comin, L.C.; Aguiar, C.C.; Sehnem, S.; Yusliza, M.Y.; Cazella, C.F.; Julkovski, D.J. Sustainable business models: A literature review. Benchmarking 2020, 27, 2028–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Goyal, P.; Rahman, Z.; Kazmi, A.A. Identification and prioritization of corporate sustainability practices using analytical hierarchy process. J. Model. Manag. 2015, 10, 23–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kühl, C.; Bourlakis, M.; Aktas, E.; Skipworth, H. How does servitisation affect supply chain circularity?—A systematic literature review. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2020, 33, 703–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Lopes, J.; Farinha, L. Industrial symbiosis in a circular economy: Towards firms’ sustainable competitive advantage. Int. J. Mechatron. Appl. Mech. 2019, 2019, 206–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Schoormann, T.; Behrens, D.; Kolek, E.; Knackstedt, R. Sustainability in business models—A literature-review-based design-science-oriented research agenda. In Proceedings of the 24th European Conference on Information Systems, ECIS 2016, Istanbul, Turkey, 12–15 June 2016. [Google Scholar]
  63. Fontana, A.; Barni, A.; Leone, D.; Spirito, M.; Tringale, A.; Ferraris, M.; Reis, J.; Goncalves, G. Circular economy strategies for equipment lifetime extension: A systematic review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 1117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Salomé Valls, A.; Peter Nadeem, S.; Anosike, A.; Kumar, V. A circularity measurement toolkit for manufacturing SMEs. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 7319–7343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Khan, S.; Haleem, A. Strategies to implement circular economy practices: A fuzzy DEMATEL approach. J. Ind. Integr. Manag. 2020, 5, 253–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Miranda, I.T.P.; Moletta, J.; Pedroso, B.; Pilatti, L.A.; Picinin, C.T. A Review on Green Technology Practices at BRICS Countries: Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. SAGE Open 2021, 11, 21582440211013780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Gupta, A.; Singh, R.K. Developing a framework for evaluating sustainability index for logistics service providers: Graph theory matrix approach. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 2020, 69, 1627–1646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Alcayaga, A.; Wiener, M.; Hansen, E.G. Towards a framework of smart-circular systems: An integrative literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 221, 622–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Awan, U.; Sroufe, R.; Shahbaz, M. Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: A literature review and recommendations for future research. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 2021, 30, 2038–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dantas, T.E.T.; de-Souza, E.D.; Destro, I.R.; Hammes, G.; Rodriguez, C.M.T.; Soares, S.R. How the combination of Circular Economy and Industry 4.0 can contribute towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 26, 213–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Gaustad, G.; Krystofik, M.; Bustamante, M.; Badami, K. Circular economy strategies for mitigating critical material supply issues. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 135, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Schroeder, P.; Anggraeni, K.; Weber, U. The Relevance of Circular Economy Practices to the Sustainable Development Goals. J. Ind. Ecol. 2019, 23, 77–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Baumgartner, R.J. Managing corporate sustainability and CSR: A conceptual framework combining values, strategies and instruments contributing to sustainable development. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2014, 21, 258–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Govindan, K.; Rajeev, A.; Padhi, S.S.; Pati, R.K. Supply chain sustainability and performance of firms: A meta-analysis of the literature. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 137, 101923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Naidoo, M.; Gasparatos, A. Corporate environmental sustainability in the retail sector: Drivers, strategies and performance measurement. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 203, 125–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Trevisan, A.H.; Zacharias, I.S.; Castro, C.G.; Mascarenhas, J. Circular economy actions in business ecosystems driven by digital technologies. Procedia CIRP 2021, 100, 325–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Trevisan, A.H.; Castro, C.G.; Gomes, L.A.V.; Mascarenhas, J. Unlocking the circular ecosystem concept: Evolution, current research, and future directions. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2022, 29, 286–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Mani, V.; Gunasekaran, A.; Delgado, C. Supply chain social sustainability: Standard adoption practices in Portuguese manufacturing firms. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018, 198, 149–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Moreau, V.; Sahakian, M.; van Griethuysen, P.; Vuille, F. Coming Full Circle: Why Social and Institutional Dimensions Matter for the Circular Economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Padilla-Rivera, A.; Russo-Garrido, S.; Merveille, N. Addressing the social aspects of a circular economy: A systematic literature review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Padilla-Rivera, A.; do Carmo, B.B.T.; Arcese, G.; Merveille, N. Social circular economy indicators: Selection through fuzzy delphi method. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 26, 101–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. AMBEV. Unindo as Pessoas Por Um Mundo Melhor: Relato Anual e de ESG Ambev 2020. 2020. Available online: https://ri.ambev.com.br/relatorios-publicacoes/relatorios-anuais-e-sustentabilidade (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  83. Irani. De Braços Abertos Para o Futuro: Relatório de Sustentabilidade. 2018. Available online: https://irani.com.br/praticas-sustentaveis/relatorio-de-sustentabilidade/ (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  84. Hering. Relatório Anual. 2020. Available online: https://ri.ciahering.com.br/cia-hering/sustentabilidade/ (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  85. Weg. Relatório Anual Integrado 2020. 2020. Available online: https://api.mziq.com/mzfilemanager/v2/d/50c1bd3e-8ac6-42d9-884f-b9d69f690602/49c4b698-8a5c-2213-9724-63538f78f277?origin=1 (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  86. Renner. Relatório Anual 2020. 2020. Available online: http://lojasrenner.mzweb.com.br/a-companhia/relatorio-anual/ (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  87. Whirlpool. Relatório de Sustentabilidade 2020. 2020. Available online: https://www.whirlpool.com.br/pagina/relatorio-de-sustentabilidade/ (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  88. Natura. Relatório Anual Natura 2020. 2020. Available online: https://static.rede.natura.net/html/sitecf/br/11_2021/relatorio_anual/Relatorio_Anual_Natura_GRI_2020.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  89. Altona. Relatório de Sustentabilidade 2021: Ano de Referência—2020. 2020. Available online: https://ri.altona.com.br/pages/informacoes_financeiras/balanco_anual_relatorio_de_sustentabilidade/2020/arquivos/Relatorio_de_sustentabilidade_2020.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  90. CSN. Relato Integrado 2020. 2020. Available online: https://ri.csn.com.br/sustentabilidade/relatorios/ (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  91. Suzano. Relatório 2020. 2020. Available online: https://r2020.suzano.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/RelatorioSuzano2020.pdf (accessed on 10 September 2021).
  92. Irani. Relato Integrado 2020 ESG. 2021. Available online: https://irani.com.br/praticas-sustentaveis/relatorio-de-sustentabilidade/ (accessed on 10 September 2021).
Figure 1. Research methodological processes.
Figure 1. Research methodological processes.
Sustainability 14 05808 g001
Figure 2. Co-occurrence network of all keywords: (a) Co-occurrence network of all keywords in the circular economy perspective; (b) Co-occurrence network of all keywords in the sustainability perspective.
Figure 2. Co-occurrence network of all keywords: (a) Co-occurrence network of all keywords in the circular economy perspective; (b) Co-occurrence network of all keywords in the sustainability perspective.
Sustainability 14 05808 g002
Figure 3. The Business Process for Sustainable Circular Economy (BP4SCE) framework.
Figure 3. The Business Process for Sustainable Circular Economy (BP4SCE) framework.
Sustainability 14 05808 g003
Table 1. Coding process examples.
Table 1. Coding process examples.
First Cycle CodingSecond Cycle Coding
In-vivoIn-vivo groupStrategies writtenCategory
“develop the circular culture”“develop the circular culture”,
“circular economy principles”, “rethink business model”
Rethinking the business model from a circular
culture
Business Model
“circular economy principles”
“rethink business model”
“product as a service”“product as a service”,
“access provision”, “result provision
Establishing product as a service systems
“access provision”
“result provision”
“redistribution”“redistribution”, “resale of used parts
or components”, “resell”
Establishing resell and
redistribution
“resale of used parts or components”
“resell”
Table 2. Selected company profiles.
Table 2. Selected company profiles.
NameSectorGRI Version
201620182020
AltonaIndustrial Machines and EquipmentG4StdStd
AmbevBeers and Soft DrinksG4StdStd
BraskemPetrochemicalsG4StdStd
CSNSteel and MetallurgyStdStdStd
DuratexWoodG4StdStd
HeringClothingStdStdStd
IraniPackagingG4StdStd
JBSMeat and DerivativesG4StdStd
M. Dias BrancoMiscellaneous FoodG4StdStd
NaturaPersonal Use ProductsStdStdStd
Ouro FinoVeterinary MedicinesG4StdStd
PortobelloConstruction ProductsG4Std-
Raia DrogasilMedicines and Other ProductsG4StdStd
RennerFabrics, Clothing and FootwearG4StdStd
SuzanoCellulose PaperG4StdStd
WegEngines, Compressors and OthersG4G4G4
WhirlpoolHome ApplianceG4StdStd
Table 3. Journal and conference publication each year.
Table 3. Journal and conference publication each year.
Year of Publication
Journal/Conference20142015201620172018201920202021Total
Sustainability Switzerland-----2215
Journal of Cleaner Production1---12-15
Sustainable Production and Consumption-------22
Business Strategy and the Environment----1--12
Journal of Industrial Ecology-----1--1
Resources Conservation and Recycling----1---1
Benchmarking------1-1
Others1211125518
Total22114781035
Table 4. Author’s theoretical perspective.
Table 4. Author’s theoretical perspective.
Theoretical Perspective
Circular EconomySustainability
Alcayaga; Wiener; Hansen (2019)Baumgartner (2014)
Awan; Sroufe; Shahbaz (2021)Comin et al. (2020)
Dantas et al. (2021)Giuffrida; Mangiaracin (2020)
Fontana et al. (2021)Govindan et al. (2020)
Garza-Reyes et al. (2019)Goyal; Rahman; Kazmi (2015)
Gaustad et al. (2018)Gupta; Singh (2020)
Guzzo et al. (2019)Islam et al. (2017)
Ingemarsdotter et al. (2019)John; Narayanamurthy (2015)
Karman (2020)Klewitz; Hansen (2014)
Khan; Heleem (2020)Lathabhavan (2021)
Khan; Heleem (2021)Malesios et al. (2021)
Konietzko; Bocken; Hultink (2020)Mani; Gunasekaran; Delgado (2018).
Kravchenko; Pigosso; McAloone (2019)Miranda et al. (2021)
Kühl et al. (2020)Naidoo; Gasparatos (2018)
Lopes; Farinha (2019)Schoormann et al. (2016)
Martins et al. (2021)
Mhatre et al. (2021)
Salvador et al. (2021)
Schroeder; Anggraeni; Weber (2019)
Stewart; Niero (2018)
Table 5. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Products and Materials. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
Table 5. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Products and Materials. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
IDSCE StrategiesNumber of
Articles
References
CES
PM1Designing environmentally safe products67[43,44,46,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59]
PM2Designing products for durability112[33,43,45,47,54,56,57,60,61,62,63,64,65]
PM3Designing products for upgradability7-[33,53,54,55,57,61,63]
PM4Eliminating hazardous and toxic substances22[43,46,54,61]
PM5Using bio-based materials83[33,44,45,47,48,51,54,57,62,64,66]
PM6Offering or using green packaging22[43,57,64,67]
PM7Offering customization and made to order2-[57,60]
PM8Reducing materials consumption65[33,43,46,47,48,51,55,59,61,64,67]
PM9Reusing products and materials143[43,44,46,48,53,54,55,56,57,58,60,63,64,68,69,70,71]
PM10Repairing and maintaining products111[33,44,46,54,55,56,57,60,63,68,70,72]
PM11Refurbishing or remanufacturing products162[33,43,44,46,48,53,54,55,56,57,60,63,64,68,69,70,71,72]
PM12Recycling products and materials175[33,43,44,47,48,50,51,53,54,55,56,57,59,60,63,64,68,69,70,71,72,73]
Table 6. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Production and Operations. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
Table 6. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Production and Operations. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
IDSCE StrategiesNumber of
Articles
References
CES
PO1Consuming renewable energy75[25,33,47,48,52,54,62,64,66,67,70,72]
PO2Reducing gas emissions79[43,46,48,56,57,59,61,62,64,66,67,70,71,73,74,75]
PO3Reducing energy consumption53[45,46,47,48,57,58,64,66]
PO4Reducing water consumption12[46,60,62]
PO5Reducing waste generation55[43,44,48,50,54,56,59,64,73,74]
PO6Reusing water22[46,48,64,66]
PO7Recovering wastes to energy generation62[33,43,47,52,54,55,57,71]
PO8Implementing composting1-[70]
Table 7. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Digitalization. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
Table 7. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Digitalization. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
IDSCE StrategiesNumber of ArticlesReferences
CES
DI1Virtualizing products or process72[33,43,44,50,54,57,65,70,71]
DI2Establishing product traceability11[25,54]
DI3Monitoring and controlling process31[25,44,54,63]
Table 8. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Logistics and Transportation. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
Table 8. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Logistics and Transportation. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
IDSCE StrategiesNumber of
Articles
References
CES
LT1Implementing reverse logistics systems115[25,33,44,46,47,48,50,54,56,57,62,64,65,70,71,75]
LT2Using green or alternative transportation24[43,51,54,56,67,75]
LT3Reducing fuel consumption-2[46,67]
Table 9. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Stakeholders’ Networks. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
Table 9. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Stakeholders’ Networks. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
IDSCE StrategiesNumber
of Articles
References
CES
SN1Evaluating suppliers using environmental criteria67[43,46,47,48,52,54,57,59,61,64,67,73,75]
SN2Collaborating with stakeholders for eco-improvements53[43,44,48,52,56,64,65,78]
SN3Collaborating with stakeholders for reverse flows22[43,54,58,72]
SN4Communicating circular issues to stakeholders64[43,45,46,48,57,58,61,64,65,73]
SN5Enabling and incentivizing suppliers to take eco-actions12[43,46,65]
SN6Enabling and incentivizing users to consume less31[33,54,57,75]
SN7Establishing industrial symbiosis71[33,43,44,54,57,64,70,72]
SN8Training employees for ecological conduct25[43,46,48,51,62,64,75]
Table 10. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Environmental Management. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
Table 10. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Environmental Management. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
IDSCE StrategiesNumber of ArticlesReferences
CES
EM1Establishing eco-friendly governance systems34[25,48,50,59,64,65,73]
EM2Managing natural resources internally15[43,52,61,62,66,75]
EM3Managing and conserving natural ecosystems11[54,58]
Table 11. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Business Model. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
Table 11. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Business Model. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
IDSCE StrategiesNumber of
Articles
References
CES
BM1Rethinking the business model from a circular culture54[25,48,50,55,56,58,62,64,65]
BM2Establishing product as a service systems83[33,44,45,54,56,57,58,62,64,70,74]
BM3Establishing resell and redistribution31[43,57,60,63]
Table 12. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Environmental Compliance. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
Table 12. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Environmental Compliance. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
IDSCE StrategiesNumber of ArticlesReferences
CES
EC1Applying Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)22[50,51,56,57]
EC2Having eco-certification-4[43,46,51,75]
EC3Having eco-labelling23[43,51,57,64,73]
EC4Respecting legislations and policies43[43,48,57,62,64,66,71]
Table 13. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Social Responsibility. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
Table 13. Number of articles per thematic unit of each SCE strategy in the category of Social Responsibility. CE—Circular Economy and S—Sustainability.
IDSCE StrategiesNumber of ArticlesReferences
CES
SR1Establishing healthy working conditions-6[46,50,51,62,73,78]
SR2Maintaining a relationship with customers-3[46,50,59]
SR3Providing diversity and work opportunities-4[46,50,62,78]
SR4Respecting and supporting the community-6[46,50,62,73,74,78]
SR5Respecting and supporting the employees-3[46,50,78]
SR6Supporting research and development-3[46,59,78]
Table 14. Amount of SCE strategies identified by category per year in each analyzed company.
Table 14. Amount of SCE strategies identified by category per year in each analyzed company.
CompanyProducts and
Materials
(12 Strategies)
Production and
Operations
(8 Strategies)
Digitalization
(3 Strategies)
Logistics and
Transportation
(3 Strategies)
Stakeholders’
Networks
(8 Strategies)
Environmental
Management
(3 Strategies)
Business
Model
(3 Strategies)
Environmental
Compliance
(4 Strategies)
Social
Responsibility
(6 Strategies)
201620182020201620182020201620182020201620182020201620182020201620182020201620182020201620182020201620182020
Altona433423111001133222000222555
Ambev436466222222657223001122566
Braskem453535001021465212011112556
CSN222565112100554333011222426
Duratex435744121020553333000333556
Hering534235011000246222100111455
Irani443677001121677233000433566
JBS345557222112476222022234546
M Dias Branco556466100112443333000222446
Natura666746133121456223011143556
Ouro Fino122534012001112111000212636
Portobello324232000011213323000100635
Raia Drogasil123011021221113013000011555
Renner298246022112457333122223446
Suzano033345011102315332001134336
Weg447524102100532333000222356
Whirlpool426356021101366202002212445
Overall Total5662766968821020231316186069783836432711293338787497
The colors in the table indicate the occurrence of the strategies. Dark green indicates a higher occurrence, and dark red a minor occurrence, with intermediate tones between these two colors.
Table 15. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Products and Materials in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
Table 15. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Products and Materials in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
IDSCE StrategiesOccurrences in CS Reporting
201620182020
PM1Designing environmentally safe products5711
PM2Designing products for durability223
PM3Designing products for upgradability000
PM4Eliminating hazardous and toxic substances433
PM5Using bio-based materials5710
PM6Offering or using green packaging8813
PM7Offering customization and made to order112
PM8Reducing materials consumption453
PM9Reusing products and materials121212
PM10Repairing and maintaining products002
PM11Refurbishing or remanufacturing products011
PM12Recycling products and materials151616
Table 16. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Production and Operations in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
Table 16. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Production and Operations in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
IDSCE StrategiesOccurrences in CS Reporting
201620182020
PO1Consuming renewable energy111516
PO2Reducing gas emissions869
PO3Reducing energy consumption1069
PO4Reducing water consumption10711
PO5Reducing waste generation7910
PO6Reusing water121213
PO7Recovering wastes to energy generation668
PO8Implementing composting576
Table 17. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Digitalization in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
Table 17. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Digitalization in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
IDSCE StrategiesOccurrences in CS Reporting
201620182020
DI1Virtualizing products or processes269
DI2Establishing product traceability133
DI3Monitoring and controlling process71111
Table 18. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Logistics and Transportation in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
Table 18. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Logistics and Transportation in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
IDSCE StrategiesOccurrences in CS Reporting
201620182020
LT1Implementing reverse logistics systems71013
LT2Using green or alternative transportation545
LT3Reducing fuel consumption120
Table 19. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Stakeholders’ Networks in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
Table 19. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Stakeholders’ Networks in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
IDSCE StrategiesOccurrences in
CS Reporting
201620182020
SN1Evaluating suppliers using environmental criteria141115
SN2Collaborating with stakeholders for eco-improvements131312
SN3Collaborating with stakeholders for reverse flows101010
SN4Communicating circular issues to stakeholders1710
SN5Enabling and incentivizing suppliers to take eco-actions121112
SN6Enabling and incentivizing users to consume less121
SN7Establishing industrial symbiosis353
SN8Training employees for ecological conduct61015
Table 20. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Environmental Management in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
Table 20. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Environmental Management in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
IDSCE StrategiesOccurrences in CS
Reporting
201620182020
EM1Establishing eco-friendly governance systems10914
EM2Managing natural resources internally161517
EM3Managing and conserving natural ecosystems121212
Table 21. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Business Model in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
Table 21. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Business Model in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
IDSCE StrategiesOccurrences in
CS Reporting
201620182020
BM1Rethinking the business model from a circular culture058
BM2Establishing product as a service systems001
BM3Establishing resell and redistribution222
Table 22. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Environmental Compliance in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
Table 22. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Environmental Compliance in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018 and 2020.
IDSCE StrategiesOccurrences in CS Reporting
201620182020
EC1Applying Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)335
EC2Having eco-certification91112
EC3Having eco-labelling357
EC4Respecting legislations and policies141414
Table 23. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Social Responsibility in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018, and 2020.
Table 23. Occurrences of the SCE strategies in the category of Social Responsibility in Brazilian CS Reporting in 2016, 2018, and 2020.
IDSCE StrategiesOccurrences in CS
Reporting
201620182020
SR1Establishing healthy working conditions161417
SR2Maintaining a relationship with customers101216
SR3Providing diversity and work opportunities121317
SR4Respecting and supporting the community171617
SR5Respecting and supporting the employees161417
SR6Supporting research and development7513
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sanches, J.R.; Trevisan, A.H.; Seles, B.M.R.P.; Castro, C.G.; Piao, R.S.; Rozenfeld, H.; Mascarenhas, J. Sustainable Circular Economy Strategies: An Analysis of Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5808. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105808

AMA Style

Sanches JR, Trevisan AH, Seles BMRP, Castro CG, Piao RS, Rozenfeld H, Mascarenhas J. Sustainable Circular Economy Strategies: An Analysis of Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Sustainability. 2022; 14(10):5808. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105808

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sanches, Julia Romano, Adriana Hofmann Trevisan, Bruno Michel Roman Pais Seles, Camila Gonçalves Castro, Roberta Souza Piao, Henrique Rozenfeld, and Janaina Mascarenhas. 2022. "Sustainable Circular Economy Strategies: An Analysis of Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Reporting" Sustainability 14, no. 10: 5808. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105808

APA Style

Sanches, J. R., Trevisan, A. H., Seles, B. M. R. P., Castro, C. G., Piao, R. S., Rozenfeld, H., & Mascarenhas, J. (2022). Sustainable Circular Economy Strategies: An Analysis of Brazilian Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Sustainability, 14(10), 5808. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105808

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop