Next Article in Journal
Geothermal Heat Pumps for Slurry Cooling and Farm Heating: Impact and Carbon Footprint Reduction in Pig Farms
Next Article in Special Issue
Evaluation of Sustainable Digital Currency Exchange Platforms Using Analytic Models
Previous Article in Journal
When Physical Chemistry Meets Circular Economy to Solve Environmental Issues: How the ReScA Project Aims at Using Waste Pyrolysis Products to Improve and Rejuvenate Bitumens
Previous Article in Special Issue
Students’ Workplace Readiness: Assessment and Skill-Building for Graduate Employability
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Blockchain Technology: Potential Applications for Public Sector E-Procurement and Project Management

1
School of Property, Construction and Project Management at RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
2
Plymouth Business School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth PL4 8AA, UK
3
School of Business, Torrens University Australia, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2022, 14(10), 5791; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105791
Submission received: 21 December 2021 / Revised: 23 February 2022 / Accepted: 24 February 2022 / Published: 10 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Industry 4.0 for Sustainable Construction Project Management)

Abstract

:
Project implementations normally fail due to sustainable development problems that inhibit the usage levels required to facilitate successful implementations. This paper explores the successful implementation from a Bangladesh perspective. In particular, it identifies the possible applications of Blockchain in project procurement and management, and it develops a guideline for incorporating Blockchain into project management to improve the existing project and the procurement management practices in developing countries. This is a qualitative study with an interpretivist research methodology. By adopting an interpretive approach, this study construes knowledge as that only gained through social constructions, such as language, shared meanings, documents, industry reports, reviews of academic papers, and tools; it is a changing and relative phenomenon. This study reveals that developing countries are suffering in terms of the development of projects, including poor project management, a lack of transparency, poor procurement management, etc. A total of 38 issues were identified through this study, which are the main barriers to the successful implementation of public sector projects. One of the main reasons is due to the practice of awarding the lowest bidder during the procurement process due to the current regulatory requirements. This paper found that the Oracle platform, built on Blockchain technology as a cloud-computing platform, is one of the prominent E-procurement platforms that provides both the Blockchain platform and the cloud-based applications. Therefore, after observing and analysing the platform, it is found that Blockchain technology has the capability to resolve 25 issues out of 38 identified issues.

1. Introduction

Successful project implementations remain a critical challenge for many organisations. Consequently, project management (PM) research has argued that much can still be learnt from studies of successful implementation and usage [1,2]. Sustainable development has been applied in PM research to create value for their stakeholders through realising benefits at an optimal resource cost, while optimising the risk [3,4].
De Mascia [3] illustrates that “a successful project is one that has delivered all aspects of the project plan, within time and budget, whilst ensuring that sponsors and stakeholder are satisfied with the quality of what has been delivered and that the delivered products or service are fit for purpose and sustainable”. Therefore, when a project cost increases, or when there are time delays due to project implementation-related problems, then, in theory, the project is not simply successful. Developing countries are facing extreme project implementation-related problems, which has become one of the main barriers towards sustainable development [5,6].
Extant PM studies have largely explored project quality, cost, and time-overrun problems have become a common phenomenon for public sector projects in developing countries [7,8]. For instance, in Bangladesh, a total number of 49 projects were completed in FY2016-17 under the Road Transport and Highway Division, where 41 of them suffered from both cost increases and schedule delays [9]. Additionally, it was found that the maximum time-overrun was 400% and the cost-overrun was 250% in those 41 projects [8,10]. Espousing these views, and an in-depth observation, reveals that accountability and trust are the issues involved with project implementation-related problems in developing countries [11,12]. Thus far, many studies and investigations have been conducted to identify the public sector project implementation problems; however, no proper technique has been identified which can eliminate the cost-overrun and time delay of development projects. However, there is a possibility that Blockchain may ensure the responsibility against the different tasks of a project, which may mitigate some of the public sector project implementation problems [13,14,15,16].
Blockchain is an upcoming technology in the project management field, which has the potential to resolve implementation-related problems [17,18,19]. Blockchain-based project management may increase the human life standard by reducing corruption [13,20]. It also protects the project from information manipulation. Carlozo [14] explained that “Blockchain is a digital ledger of economic transactions that is fully public, continually updated by countless users, and considered by many impossible to corrupt. It is a list of a continuous record of blocks”. Shojaei et al. [21] explained that this technology can be used as a tool for the project’s information system. Gausdal et al. [15] claimed that poor data management can increase the project costs by up to 20%. Additionally, they explained that digital innovation, such as Blockchain technology, may establish regulation, which has potential to reduce the project cost.
Accordingly, there are certain limitations in these studies, as they relate to understanding the concepts of Blockchain and project management systems. The previous excerpts imply that, to ensure a successful project, there is a need for more explanatory studies regarding the project problem [22,23]. In a recent study, Idrees et al. [24] suggested that Blockchain is a phenomenon involving the introduction of something new to an organisation, either objectively or subjectively. Fundamental to the notion of introducing Blockchain technology is the element of change initiated in the material and/or social world, as part of learning often involves the alteration of relationships and the prior ways of doing things. However, what is not well researched or known is the how Blockchain technology can influence project performance, and what the possible applicable areas in project management are. Consequently, the influence of Blockchain technology for managing projects effectively may well be relevant and, therefore, it conforms well to building a comprehensive framework as a guideline.
The purpose of this paper is, therefore, to:
  • Investigate the issues that affect the successful implementation of the public sector infrastructure projects in developing/developed countries;
  • Identify the possible application of Blockchain in project and procurement management;
  • Develop a guideline to incorporate Blockchain into project management for improving the existing project and procurement management practices in developing countries, such as Bangladesh.
The remainder of this paper is organised as follows. The paper starts by explaining the basic concepts of projects and project management, followed by identifying the existing project implementation problem within the public sector projects in developing countries. Then, the paper talks about the basics of Blockchain technology and the possible applications of Blockchain technology in the field of project and procurement management. The following section presents the advantages and risks of a Blockchain-based E-procurement system and discusses the working principle of Blockchain technology under the Oracle platform [25,26]. Towards the end of the paper, the authors discuss the potentiality of the Blockchain technology for mitigating the existing project and procurement management issues, and conclude by providing a conceptual framework for Blockchain-based E-procurement in Bangladesh.

2. Literature Review and Theoretical Background

2.1. Projects vs. Project Management

A distinction has been made between the concepts of project success and project management success by PM researchers. Aditya et al. [27] pointed out that project success focuses on the overall objectives of the project, while project management success focuses on scope of the projects, including the cost, time, and quality. They believe that the project success criteria consist of project management success and product success. According to PMI [28], “projects are undertaken to fulfil objectives by producing deliverables”. A project is undertaken to resolve a specific problem within a fixed budget and period. The success criteria of projects are determined by cost, quality, and time [29,30], also called the ‘iron or golden triangle’. If a project is to be completed within a particular time frame and to a desired quality, but the estimated cost is increased, then it is not considered a successful project [31]. Similarly, if a project fails to achieve any elements of the iron triangle, then it is considered an unsuccessful project.
On the other hand, proper project management support makes a project successful. According to PMI [28], “project management is the application of knowledge, skills, tools, and techniques to project activities to meet the project requirements”. Therefore, project management provides a guideline for success by adopting a systematic approach.

2.2. Project Implementation Problem of the Public Sector Projects

Public sector project implementation problems are common all over the world. However, developing countries need to minimize these problems immediately, as a huge amount of investment and foreign employment is related to them. Furthermore, when large project costs are increase or delayed, then it directly hampers the economic development of an underdeveloped or developing country. Hence, it is also very important to know the reasons of the project implementation problems in developed countries, because developed countries use more advanced technology compared to developing countries, and developing countries may face these problems in future. Thus, the analysis of both categories will ensure a better outcome of the research.

2.2.1. Project Implementation Problems in Developing Countries

Park and Papadopoulou [32] conducted a study on 35 transport infrastructure-related projects which were completed between 1983 and 2010 in Asian developing and emerging countries, including Bangladesh, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Myanmar, Pakistan, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam. They identified 27 project implementation problems, and their study found that the most significant reason for the cost-overrun in Asia is the common practice of awarding contracts to the lowest bidder for infrastructure-related projects.
The accessible knowledge and information about what has happened in past events, when it is available and verified during the planning stages, may provide helpful knowledge and information for future and ongoing projects. In essence, the use of project members’ knowledge can potentially reduce uncertainty and risky situations in its implementation. Thus, past records are considered as a valuable source for planning, time, and cost estimations. However, in developing countries, all the important documents of projects may not be managed properly, or may be destroyed after the completion of the projects. Gamez and Touran [33] studied 89 transportation infrastructure projects funded by the World Bank in 60 developing countries, and claimed that, for large infrastructure projects, costs are overestimated, and the duration is calculated very optimistically due to poor information management. The literature claims that project tracking, documentation, and reporting is not inclusive and is not properly done. They also found that the overall project cost was overestimated for 59% of projects and, in case of the project duration, the average project delay was an increase of 35% from the original schedule. Therefore, keeping proper records of the project, and increasing the predictability of a similar type of project, will enhance the probability of success in the future.
An important factor for achieving a successful completion of a project within an organisations is governance. Project management processes change with time, and researchers emphasize good governance as a pre-condition to closing a project within an allocated budget and time. Zarewa et al. [2] argued that project governance has an impact on project performance, and improper project governance is a reason for large infrastructure project failures.

2.2.2. Issues Affecting the Public Sector Projects

The main objective of this section is to identify the main barriers against the successful completion of public sector projects in both developing and developed countries. Based on the data found from different sources, a total of 38 reasons have been identified. All the issues have been classified into four themes using brainstorming techniques and thematic analysis; these themes are legal, managerial, financial, and organisational. A few issues are listed within more than one theme.
Table 1 identifies all the issues involved with public sector projects after investigating various projects/samples from Bangladesh, Denmark, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nigeria, the Netherlands, the OECD, Pakistan, the Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, and Vietnam [9,27,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41].

2.3. Blockchain

In the new era, management is concerned with providing the right goods, at the right time, with the right amount, at the right place, at the right price, and under the right conditions for the right customer [12,24,42]. Using international standards and advanced technology, the Blockchain technology changes the traditional system and processes into a smart system.
Global Blockchain technologies are complex and face multiple uncertainties [43]. Despite the increasing use of Blockchain in a project management concept, we still face many challenges in this regard. Most challenges are related to security concerns and privacy [20,24]. Therefore, introducing a reliable and secure system has become the main concern of this era. Using artificial intelligence (AI) through robotics and nanotechnologies, have become popular for the fourth industrial revolution [1,44]. Previously, not only with international transactions, but for many local transactions, third parties were always involved with the payment system. One the one hand, the transaction costs a lot, and on the other hand, the process consumes a lot of time.
Nowadays, different vendors of different countries are famous for their best-quality products, which are an important component of procurement for most of the development projects. To make the procurement process easy and transparent, the introduction of the smart contracts and making the payment fast without a third party are the challenges of the project management arena. Blockchain-based project management could bring a revolutionary change to project management.
Blockchain is a new technology, and its name is hidden behind the operation process. Researchers claim that it is an upcoming technology, or a technology that is under experimentation [45,46]. Blockchain came into focus for mitigating the payment problem of the E-commerce system through Bitcoin. Bitcoin was invented by Nakamoto in 2008 [12,47,48]. However, few recent articles have explained that Blockchain-based project management may mitigate project implementation-related problems [13,45,49]. Therefore, it is essential to properly understand the Blockchain technology and its working principles [17,50].

2.3.1. What Is Blockchain Technology?

Blockchain is a chain of interconnected secured blocks with the storing facilities of all transactions. Welfare [51] provides shorter and longer definitions of Blockchain in his book Commercializing Blockchain: Strategic Applications in the Real World, which are mentioned sequentially below:
“Trusted and efficient way of sharing data and transection”; “Blockchain technology can be viewed as a distributed ledger of information, which maintains a continuously growing list of records, called blocks, secured from tempering and changes”.
Blockchain is a new technology that is considered a digital ledger for any online transaction [14]. Bitcoin was invented in the year 2008 to mitigate the payment problem of E-commerce. Bitcoin is a cryptocurrency based on Blockchain [52]. Blockchain is considered an unlimited interconnected database, where it can record all transactional information in blocks.
Blockchain consists of two elements, transactions and blocks, as shown in Figure 1. When the user performs any task, it is called transection. On the other hand, blocks record all transactions [45]. Additionally, each block contains data and the hash value of the previous block. The hash function ensures a secure transaction.

2.3.2. Why Is Blockchain Unique?

Welfare [51] argued that there are a few characteristics that make Blockchain technology unique.
Trust: Nowadays, a lack of trust is a major problem, whether it is in business, government, communities, or processes. Due to this, it takes longer to make a supply and chain-related contract or to complete an audit. However, this technology ensures trust between different parties.
Transparency and openness: All the information in this system updates automatically and it is open to all. Therefore, customers, owners, and organisations rely on the available information. Every project manager can easily imagine the benefit of a project with a transparent and open procurement system.
Immutability: The basic characteristic of a Blockchain system is that, after inserting any information, it is not possible to either alter, delete, or change it. It will update automatically after the approval of the concerned persons.
Transaction automation and smart contracts: The most important advantage of Blockchain is the automation of certain tasks, which is known as a smart contract. After making a smart contract, it became possible to enable the automation of a few tasks and transactions.

2.4. Possible Applications of Blockchain Technology in Project Management

Cloud-based applications are those through which the cloud-based software makes it possible to access through local devices, such as Apple iCloud, Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Oracle, who all provide cloud-based services [53]. Among those, Oracle also provides Blockchain technology, including a supply chain application [25]. Oracle-based Blockchain technology will be discussed to identify the possible application of Blockchain in the project management arena. Oracle provides various types of services, as shown in Figure 2 [26].

2.4.1. E-Procurement/Comprehensive Administration by Oracle Blockchain Platform

E-Procurements or Comprehensive Administration

Procuring either goods, works, or services is a common requirement for development projects. It has been found that awarding the contract to the lowest bidder is one of the main causes for delaying projects [32,36,54]. Changing data or the improper evaluation alters the ranking of bidders during tender evaluation. Furthermore, procurement is the most common area that is known for corruption. However, introducing Blockchain for tender evaluation will resolve the main issues related to procurement [41]. Therefore, Blockchain-based E-procurement may change the project implementation process.

Components for Blockchai-Based E-Procurements System

Three components are essential to establish a Blockchain-based E-procurement system. Thio-Ac et al. [41] explained that those three components are a digital asset, digital signature, and multi-signature protocol, as shown in Figure 3.
The digital asset is known as the digital notarization. In traditional procurement, the procurement entity/owner informs the requirement to different contractors/organisations through publishing advertisements. The digital asset is known as all the authentic documents related to the whole procurement process. All the associated users of a Blockchain system will have individual private and public keys. To validate a contract between two parties, these keys will be used, known as a digital signature. The digital signature makes any document a legal document. A multi-signature protocol is used for any financial transaction. After finishing any task by the contractor, the authorized group confirms it, and then the contracted money is transferred to the desired account through the multi-signature protocol.

E-procurement through Cloud/Blockchain Platform

Many organisations provide cloud/Blockchain-based services. Oracle provides both services. Based on that, the possible procurement steps for any projects are shown in Figure 4 [26,30].
In summary, at this point, the implication of the literature review for this study is that the sustainable development problems have been formulated by researchers as the search for relevant factors or variables that are, supposedly, correlated with outcomes. As reported, this study identifies the possible application of Blockchain in project and procurement management, and it develops a guideline to incorporate Blockchain in project management for improving the existing project and procurement management practices in developing countries. By adopting an interpretive approach, this study construes knowledge as only gained through social constructions, such as language, shared meanings, documents, industry reports, reviews of academic papers, and tools; it is a changing and relative phenomenon. Thus, it adopts a combination of systematic techniques, such as a research method and the socio-technical theory as the research-sensitizing concept. In order to do this systematic literature review, we used guidelines provided by Kitchenham [55] which suggests five different steps for the review: (1) identify the resources, (2) the study selection, (3) data extraction, (4) data synthesis, and (5) writing up the study as a report.

3. Findings

3.1. Advantages and Risks of Blockchain-Based E-Procurement System

Automatic operations: The automatic operation system is the most advantageous of the Cloud/Blockchain-based E-procurement system [30]. It has the potentiality to make a revolutionary change in the procurement system. It will resolve the barrier of location. Any bidder will be able to participate in the tendering process from anywhere in the world. Therefore, it will increase the probability of getting the contract to the most efficient contractor.
Controlling flexibility: Controlling and evaluating Blockchain-based procurement will be easy, compared to the traditional system [30]. It will enable us to view the status from a dashboard and to navigate the nodes through the network nodes. Everything will be possible to control from the dashboard.
Flexible monitoring and troubleshooting: Blockchain-based procurement will enable us to monitor the whole system [30,56]. Therefore, it will ensure transparency and accountability of the procurement. Additionally, it will enable us to troubleshoot if any serious problems occur.
The findings regarding the advantages of Blockchain-based E-procurement have been classified into four categories: the legal, managerial, financial, and organisational advantages. The following section explains how Blockchain-based project management will support the reduction of the identified public sector project-related issues in developing countries.

3.1.1. Legal Advantages

Blockchain-based project management will ensure some legal advantages to the concerned organisations of developing countries. The potential advantages will be discussed in the following sections.
(a)
E-procurement: E-procurement is the main legal advantage of Blockchain-based project management. Blockchain-based project management will enable them to do all the procurement processes online [41]. Additionally, it will enable the shift from a paper-based procurement system to a paperless/online-based procurement system.
(b)
On-time tendering system: The delay in the tendering process is a common problem in developing countries. Due to this, infrastructure-related public sector projects are delayed in developing countries [41,57]. However, due to its automation and less human effort, all the procurement steps will be able to be complete within the assigned/allocated time against each step. Therefore, if Blockchain-based project management followed, then it is expected that the tendering process will be finished within the planned time of all projects.
(c)
Transparency: A lack of transparency is one of the main reasons for delaying public sector infrastructure-related projects in developing countries [35,36,57]. Blockchain-based project management ensures a secure and private network between the users. All the associated members of different organisations, and even top management, will be able to follow the task during the project’s duration [41,51]. Therefore, all the project-related tasks during the project’s processing and implementation will be transparent to everyone involved with the project.
(d)
Accountability: Poor accountability is another major problem in project management. A project may fail due to individuals making poor decisions [35]. When something goes wrong with a project, no one takes the responsibility for delaying public sector projects in developing countries. However, Blockchain is considered a digital ledger for any online transactions [14]. Additionally, it is not possible to either alter, delete, or change any Blockchain-based information without the permission of all concerned persons [51]. Therefore, it will become straightforward to identify the accountable person/organisation for whom any task has been delayed by.
(e)
Secured network system: All the nodes and APIs (Application Programming Interface) need to be designed for a specific project; therefore, the Blockchain network is considered to be the most secure network. Furthermore, the system updates automatically [51]. Therefore, the network will be trusted by the owner and the vendor [30,57,58].
(f)
Lowest bidder issue: The lowest bidder issue is one of the common and important issues discussed by the different researchers [32,36,41]. Due to avariety of reasons, the lowest and winner bidder increases the cost and duration of the project. However, with the Blockchain project management system, if any vendor failed to finish a project within the contracted time and cost without any valid reason, then the vendor may be punished by liquidated damages, or ministries may have the authority to blacklist the vendor.
(g)
Provenance of materials: Blockchain provides the facility of the vendors/contractors to participate in bidding from all over the world. It opens the opportunities to choose the best vendor. Furthermore, the buyer can monitor the production of materials to ensure the quality of materials [19].

3.1.2. Managerial Advantages

Blockchain-based project management will ensure some managerial advantages, as well as the potential advantages discussed below.
The tracking of equipment and materials: Project tracking is very important to check the achievement of the milestones of infrastructure projects. A lot of time is consumed to collect and prepare the update of projects, as well as sending the updates to different ministries. However, Blockchain-based project management will facilitate the tracking of projects and equipment [56]. Christodoulou et al. [54] also argued that it will also play a vital role in supply and chain management. A Blockchain-based tracking system will save a lot of time for project managers and will allow them to revise their plans based on the situation.
Fast inspection: Slow inspection is one of the managerial problems and one of the causes of project delays [32,36]. Fast inspection is important from both the owner’s and vendor’s points of view. A fast inspection will allow for the identification of the future needs and possible risks of the project, which will enhance the successful completion of the project [56].
Proper communication: A lack of communication between parties is also a barrier to a successful project [36,37,40]. However, Blockchain-based project management will enable the automatic communication between parties and various ministries within a government [30]. Moreover, it will also become proof of responsibility.

3.1.3. Financial Advantages

Blockchain-based project management will ensure some financial advantages to the concerned organisations in developing countries, and the potential advantages are discussed below.
Automatic and secured fund transfers through smart contracts: Automatic and secured fund transfers through smart contracts are one of the main advantages of Blockchain technology [56]. It ensures trust and support to reduce corruption, as all the transactions will be recorded permanently [58]. Furthermore, it will help the audit department of the public sector, because the auditor can easily trace the transaction of money in case of any fraudulent transactions.
Proper cost estimation for future projects: A higher cost estimation for machinery is a common problem in developing countries [32,36]. However, Blockchain-based record management will keep the actual price of the equipment against the projects, which will help to estimate similar project costs in the future [45,46].
Support to ensure adequate funds for the project: Sometimes the owner’s fund shortage delays a project, and it can be considered poor financial planning by an organisation [36]. However, as top management of various ministries and organisations will be a part of the chain through Blockchain, the financial planning will become easier and more accurate. It will protect any financial deficiencies against a project as it will become very easy to identify the people responsible for the issue.

3.1.4. Organisational Advantages

Blockchain-based project management will ensure some organisational advantages, and these potential advantages are discussed below.
Vendor management: Organisations will be able to identify the performance of the different vendors or contractors overall. Sometimes vendors fail to achieve the target on time, but do not want to pay compensation, and the project suffers [9,41]. Therefore, all the organisations will be able to maintain the best vendor list based on their experiences.
Proper planning and estimation for future projects: Poor contract management and the improper planning of projects can be considered the institutional problem of an organisationorganisation, and the situation is not possible to improve until the organisation improves their information management system [27,35,36]. The proper information will help the organisation to plan and estimate the cost of the project properly. Gausdal et al. [15] argued that improper data management can increase the cost of a project by up to 20%. Blockchain-based project management will not only manage the data of a project, but it will also store the data for future similar projects.
Customer- and end-user-centric worldview: Nowadays, the fourth industrial revolution is changing the construction industry. The projects receiving priority are those that have the potentiality to deliver the highest value to the customer. Blockchain technology is playing a vital role in improving collaboration and communication in the case of a cloud-based project management system. Therefore, it is only a matter of time before organisations will need to adopt new technology, such as Blockchain, to manage projects [13,16].

3.1.5. Risks of Blockchain

Blockchain technology may have few issues. Firstly, it is very difficult to change user habits. As it is a new system, people will be reluctant to use it (Welfare, 2019). Secondly, governments will get most of the benefits from this technology. However, if the government doesn’t show any interest, then there will be a problem. Finally, this technology will be used all over the world. However, the internet and telecommunication policies are different for each country. Hence, to create a standard among all providers will be challenging [51,54].
Lu et al. [57] pointed out that although Blockchain technology has many advantages, the current operating system is still not perfect, and there are many risks. Risks can be divided into operational risks, cyber risks, and legal risks.
Operational risks mean that if Blockchain is applied to technical or social issues, it may produce unsuccessful results. This may be reflected in:
  • A loss of data and identity;
  • The transaction costs of the public Blockchain, which are high;
  • A lack of recipients and users;
  • A lack of long-term experience, which leads to imperfect management;
  • The initial applications, which may have technical problems.
  • A lack of a standardized mode of operation and function, as well as security deficiencies.
Cyber risks refer to bad behaviors, such as fraud, due to insufficient security levels or design flaws, which are reflected in [57]:
  • There may be fraud in the interface between the real world and the Blockchain world;
  • The exchange may be attacked by hackers, the user passwords may be hacked, and the funds transferred;
  • The hard fork in the block will cause the trust of the entire network system to be questioned.
Legal risks refer to some illegal acts that may occur in the operation of block chains, which are reflected in [57]:
  • Tax evasion may be triggered;
  • Illegal use of information may occur;
  • Blockchains are used for illegal transactions.

3.1.6. Application of Blockchain Technology in Project Management

Blockchain technology could be used to create smart contracts for tracking projects through the Oracle Blockchain platform. It is argued that projects fail due to poor tracking, and Blockchain provides a tracking facility through a smart contract. Improper project monitoring and activity scheduling are key reasons for project delays, and the consequence of it is a cost-overrun. The purchasing of equipment and materials are almost essential for all construction projects. Hence, delaying the supply of these materials is not acceptable for a successful project. Francisco and Swanson [56] claimed that traceability through smart contracts is the main advantage of Blockchain technology. Christodoulou et al. [54] also argued that the Blockchain-based contract possibly will mitigate logistic supply-related problems through tracking. Therefore, project tracking through a smart contract may reduce some issues with project management.
Blockchain platforms, such as Oracle, or other providers, provide a smart contract facility [58]. To create a smart contract, the steps to follow are shown in Figure 5 [30]. At first, after opening an account, creating a real-time business to business (B2B) transaction/condition for establishing Blockchain business logic is needed. The transactions/conditions could be points of sales (POs), invoices, shipping information, etc. [30]. After that, Blockchain records every step; thus, all the steps will be converted into an automatic system through the Smart Development Kit (SDK) and will enable actions based on the event payload [30]. The event payload information is useful when anyone wishes to distribute an event through the API. Then, data schema, initialized data values, and methods need to be defined in the chain-code. Lastly, policies are endorsed regarding how many signatures from different officials are required to approve any task.

3.1.7. Authentic Financial Transactions and Digital Payments through Oracle Blockchain Platform

Blockchain-based digital payments could ensure trust between owners and contractors. Already, a secured digital payment system has been implemented through Blockchain. Traditionally, one extra organisation ensures security between parties. The dependency on the extra organisation increases more when the contractor or supplier comes from a different country. Furthermore, this creates additional costs and more time. However, Ammous (2019) argued that, based on owner confirmations, the transaction is possible to finish almost instantly using Blockchain and without involving another organisation.
Digital payment is one of the major advantages of Blockchain technology. The steps for executing digital payments are shown in Figure 6 [30]. To initiate a digital transaction, a Blockchain-based platform/smart contract is required. The steps of a digital transaction are its initiation, record, notification, approval, and transfer. The whole transaction is done through a confidential domain and multiple channels.

3.1.8. Automated Document Management

Document management is an important part of project management, but developing countries do not maintain these properly. Gausdal et al. [15] argued that the project cost might raise by 20% only because of improper document management. Improper estimations and scheduling costs extra money and time. In Blockchain, all the project information will be recorded automatically [46]. It will not only support the ongoing project, but it will also support similar types of future projects.

3.2. Potential of the Blockchain Technology to Mitigate the Existing Project Management Risks

The above discussion pointing towards that Blockchain technology has the potential to resolve the 25 identified problems, out of 38, which hinder the successful implementation of public sector infrastructure-related problems in developing countries, especially for Bangladesh, as shown in Table 2. The below table also shows which problems might be partially resolved (five issues) and will not be resolved (10 issues) by Blockchain technology.

4. Discussion and Contributions

4.1. Conceptual Framework for E-Procurement in Bangladesh

The main goal of this research is to develop a conceptual framework to incorporate Blockchain into project management for improving the existing project management practices in developing countries, such as Bangladesh. Figure 7 shows the conceptual framework regarding how Blockchain technology can be introduced for E-procurement in the public sector project management of Bangladesh [41,42]. The following steps are needed to achieve this goal.
(i)
Use case identification: In Bangladesh, public sector projects are mainly approved by ECNEC. However, the small projects (based on cost) with conditions are approved by the Honourable Minister of Ministries. Then, before starting the procurement by the agencies after the required components, the cost, duration, and other criteria are finalized according to Digital Procurement Platform (DPP).
(ii)
Creating the account and consensus mechanisms: A project director/project manager is assigned by the ministry immediately after the final approval of a project in Bangladesh. In the next step, the project manager will open an account in Blockchain-based service provider websites, such as Oracle. Account verification is an essential step to opening an account. After opening an account, the private and public keys will generate against the account [41]. There are different types of Blockchain platforms provided by the different service providers, such as:
  • The Standard Edition: two OCPUs, 50 GB storage, two peers (additional peers can be added later) [30]. The OCPU is the Oracle Compute Unit per hour. Higher capacity options are also available.
(iii)
Buyer/supplier: In government projects, all the procurement deals are for buying either goods, works, or services; therefore, the project manager or the IT team of the project should deal as a buyer [30].
(iv)
Designing the nodes: The node design is a part of the Blockchain platform. It mainly provides permissions regarding who will be able to access the platform [59]. Therefore, during the bidding process, it will be open for all. After that, it will remain open for specific government organisations, such as the Ministry, Planning Commission, IMED, concerned agency, etc.
(v)
Building the API and creating/posting advertisements: The next step is very important as it deals with the Blockchain post based on the project requirements. An API is needed at this stage [30,59]. It may also be called the user interface. Various programming languages can be used to create the API, such as HTML5, CSS, PHP, C#, Java, Javascript, Python, Ruby, Golang, Solidity, Angular JS Nodejs, MySQL, and MongoDB [59]. A chain code is created through the API.
(vi)
Approval of procurement posts/advertisements: The project team will send a request to the CPTU (Central Procurement Technical Unit) for the approval of the post, as the CPTU controls the E-procurement of Bangladesh. The Blockchain address of the post will generate after the approval of the post by the CPTU.
(vii)
Procurement post/advertisement publication in the dashboard: Next, the advertisement will become available in the dashboard. Then, all the contractors/vendors will participate in getting the task, and the owner will wait for the bidder.
(viii)
Bidders’ participation: In this stage, all the vendors will be allowed to participate in the bidding process within the allocated time. When vendors will submit their bid, then they will receive a Blockchain-notarized receipt.
(ix)
Bidders’ rankings: Later, bidders will be ranked according to their price and other conditions. The project team, agency, and the concerned ministry will finalize the evaluation conditions of the vendor. Finally, the top-ranked vendor will be negotiated for the contract. If the top-ranked vendor agrees with the owner of the contract, then the vendor will be finalised [41].
(x)
Creating a smart contract with a multi-signature protocol: Deploying the chain code, the multi-signature protocol needed to create a smart contract, is done in this stage (Thio-Ac et al., 2019b). This stage is very important because all the government policies and fund release conditions will be integrated within the system, such as after the field visit of IMED, the fund will be released by the concerned ministry (if the task meets all the criteria). Otherwise, the ministry will not release the fund against the project.
(xi)
Notification of award (NOA): A NOA will be issued after creating the smart contract. The NOA will be notarized using the Blockchain platform and after that, it will be sent to all concerned stakeholders according to the law/policy of Bangladesh [41].
(xii)
Commencing the project/work package: Finally, the vendor will start working for the project according to the timeline of the project.

4.2. Future Research Agenda

The above discussion may have opened the opportunities to conduct further research, which are presented below:
(a)
Blockchain technology is a new technology. Hence, the researcher can try to find other applications of this technology which might support managing projects.
Researchers can also research private organisation projects which are using Blockchain technology for project management to explore the actual pros and cons of the technology.
(b)
ICT sector researchers can research developing the Blockchain platform and the API (Application Programming Interface) for experimenting on the overall efficiency and performance of Blockchain-based project management;
(c)
Further research can be done to develop a Blockchain-based E-procurement system for public sector projects in the context of developing countries.

5. Conclusions

The aggressive competition has shaped the need for implementing new frameworks to help organisations succeed in a project. Project implementations normally fail due to sustainable development problems that inhibit the usage levels required to facilitate successful implementation. The problems include the main reasons for delaying projects which end with a cost-overrun. It is easy to control small projects, but difficult to control large projects. The public sector invests a huge amount of money for large infrastructure-related projects through development projects. However, due to the shortcomings of the existing system, the cost and project duration increases become a common phenomenon for infrastructure-related projects in developing countries. Therefore, it is the proper time to bring in changes and to introduce new technology with the existing project management system. This paper explores the successful implementation from the Bangladesh perspective. In particular, it identifies the possible applications of Blockchain in project and procurement management and it develops a guideline to incorporate Blockchain into project management for improving the existing project and procurement management practices in developing countries.
Project management which uses Blockchain technology is known as Blockchain-based project management. This study investigates the potential use of Blockchain technology for public sector infrastructure-related projects in developing countries, especially for Bangladesh, concluding with the following statements based on the research question.
No proper evidence has found out which developing countries are using Blockchain technology for public sector infrastructure-related projects. However, it has been found that the governments of some countries are planning to use Blockchain-based project management for E-procurement as a pilot basis, such as Mexico. Therefore, for public sector infrastructure project procurement activities, Blockchain is still in the experimental phase. Although, it has been found that many developing countries are using Blockchain technology for financial transactions. However, it is understood that currently, Blockchain technology has been practiced by many world-leading organisations/companies such as Amazon, IBM, BMW, General Electric, and Microsoft. Many other organisations are using Blockchain technology for different purposes.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, I.A.; Data curation, N.A. and T.M.; Formal analysis, M.K. and O.H.; Investigation, T.M.; Methodology, M.K., N.A. and I.A. Project administration, O.H.; Resources, N.A.; Supervision, M.K. and T.M.; Validation, T.M.; Writing—review & editing, O.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdullah, R.; Faizal, M. Block Chain: Cryptographic Method in Fourth Industrial Revolution. Int. J. Comput. Netw. Inf. Secur. 2018, 9, 9–17. [Google Scholar]
  2. Zarewa, G.; Ibrahim, A.; Ibrahim, Y.; Adogbo, K. Governance Impact Assessment on Large Infrastructure Project (LIP) Delivery. J. Eng. Proj. Prod. Manag. 2018, 8, 9–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. De Mascia, S. Project Psychology: Using Psychological Models and Techniques to Create a Successful Project; Routledge: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Özkan, E.; Azizi, N.; Haass, O. Leveraging Smart Contract in Project Procurement through DLT to Gain Sustainable Competitive Advantages. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ezzat, A. Challenges of mega construction projects in developing countries. Organ. Technol. Manag. Constr. 2013, 5, 730–746. [Google Scholar]
  6. Siddique, S.; Ahsan, A.; Azizi, N.; Haass, O. Students’ Workplace Readiness: Assessment and Skill-Building for Graduate Employability. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Khalfan, M.; McDermott, P.; Cooper, R. Integrating the supply chain within construction industry. In Proceedings of the 20th ARCOM Conference, Edinburgh, UK, 1–3 September 2004; Volume 2, pp. 897–904. [Google Scholar]
  8. Jelena, M.A.; Abdul-Majeed, M.; Jiayuan, W.; Patrick, X.W.Z.; Ruoyu, Z. The cost performance and causes of overruns in infrastructure development projects in Asia. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 2019, 25, 203–214. [Google Scholar]
  9. IMED: Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation Division 2019—Project Completion Report FY 2016-17. Available online: https://imed.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/imed.portal.gov.bd/page/315d64be_c080_478a_8b14_fddea2e03f02/road%20division_part_2.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2020).
  10. Khalfan, M.M.A.; McDermott, P.; Oyegoke, A.S.; Dickinson, M.T.; Li, X. Application of Kanban in the UK Construction Industry by Public Sector Clients. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Manchester, UK, 16–18 July 2008; pp. 347–357. [Google Scholar]
  11. Oladapo, A. A quantitative assessment of the cost and time impact of variation orders on construction projects. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2007, 5, 35–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Azizi, N.; Malekzadeh, H.; Akhavan, P.; Haass, O.; Saremi, S.; Mirjalili, S. IoT–Blockchain: Harnessing the Power of Internet of Thing and Blockchain for Smart Supply Chain. Sensors 2021, 21, 6048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Risius, M.; Spohrer, K. A Blockchain Research Framework. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2017, 59, 385–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Carlozo, L. What is blockchain? J. Account. 2017, 224, 29. [Google Scholar]
  15. Gausdal, A.; Czachorowski, K.; Solesvik, M. Applying Blockchain Technology: Evidence from Norwegian Companies. Sustainability 2018, 10, 1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Haass, O.; Azizi, N. Challenges and solutions across project life cycle: A knowledge sharing perspective. Int. J. Proj. Organ. Manag. 2020, 12, 346–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Denter, N.M.; Seeger, F.; Moehrle, M.G. How can Blockchain technology support patent management? A systematic literature review. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2022, 102506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. McDermott, P.; Khalfan, M. Achieving Supply Chain Integration within Construction Industry. Constr. Econ. Build. 2006, 6, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Rana, N.P.; Dwivedi, Y.K.; Hughes, D.L. Analysis of challenges for blockchain adoption within the Indian public sector: An interpretive structural modelling approach. Inf. Technol. People 2021, 35, 548–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Azizi, N.; Akhavan, P.; Philsoophian, M.; Davison, C.; Haass, O.; Saremi, S. Exploring the Factors Affecting Sustainable Human Resource Productivity in Railway Lines. Sustainability 2022, 14, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shojaei, A.; Wang, J.; Fenner, A. Exploring the feasibility of blockchain technology as an infrastructure for improving built asset sustainability. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 2019, 10, 184–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Schweizer, A.; Knoll, P.; Urbach, N.; von der Gracht, H.A.; Hardjono, T. To what extent will blockchain drive the machine economy? Perspectives from a prospective study. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2020, 67, 1169–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Azizi, N.; Rowlands, B. Developing an IT Risk Management Culture Framework. In ICT for an Inclusive World; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 483–491. [Google Scholar]
  24. Idrees, S.M.; Nowostawski, M.; Jameel, R.; Mourya, A.K. Security Aspects of Blockchain Technology Intended for Industrial Applications. Electronics 2021, 10, 951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Oracle. Oracle, 2020a, Oracle Blockchain; Oracle: Austin, TX, USA, 2020; Available online: https://www.oracle.com/blockchain/ (accessed on 3 July 2020).
  26. Oracle. Oracle, 2020b, Blockchain Platform; Oracle: Austin, TX, USA, 2020; Available online: https://www.oracle.com/au/index.html (accessed on 4 July 2020).
  27. Aditya, A.; Douglass, D.; Bhattacharya, M. Urban Infrastructure Development Works in India: Delay and Difficulties in Implementation with Reference to a Water Supply Project. Civ. Archit. Environ. Agric. Eng. 2017, 98, 349–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Project Management Institute. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 6th ed.; Project Management Institute: Newtown Square, PA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  29. Atkinson, R. Project management: Cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, it’s time to accept other success criteria. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 1999, 17, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Oracle. Oracle, 2020c, Securely, Reliably Extend Business Processes and Accelerate B2B Transactions; Oracle: Austin, TX, USA, 2020; Available online: https://www.oracle.com/au/application-development/cloud-services/blockchain-platform/ (accessed on 6 July 2020).
  31. Lester, A. Project Management, Planning and Control: Managing Engineering, Construction and Manufacturing Projects to PMI, APM and BSI Standards, 7th ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  32. Park, Y.-I.; Papadopoulou, T. Causes of cost overruns in transport infrastructure projects in Asia. Their significance and relationship with project size. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 2012, 2, 195–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gamez, E.A.; Touran, A. A Quantitative Analysis of the Performance of Transportation Projects in Developing Countries. Transp. Rev. 2010, 30, 361–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Haass, O.; Azizi, N. Knowledge sharing practice in project-oriented organisations: A practical framework based on project life cycle and project management body of knowledge. Int. J. Proj. Organ. Manag. 2019, 11, 171–197. [Google Scholar]
  35. Bruzelius, N.; Flyvbjerg, B.; Rothengatter, W. Big decisions, big risks. Improving accountability in mega projects. Transp. Policy 2002, 9, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Islam, M.; Suhariadi, B. Construction delays in privately funded large building projects in Bangladesh. Build. Hous. 2018, 19, 415–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Infrastructure Governance Challenges; OECD Publishing: Paris, France, 2017.
  38. Mahamadu, A.-M.; Manu, P.; Booth, C.; Olomolaiye, P.; Coker, A.; Ibrahim, A.; Lamond, J. Infrastructure procurement skills gap amongst procurement personnel in Nigeria’s public sector. J. Eng. Des. Technol. 2018, 16, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Naveed, K.M.; Muhammad, F.K. Comparative Analysis of Similar Public Sector Projects with Different Success Outcome. J. Strategy Perform. Manag. 2019, 7, 106–132. [Google Scholar]
  40. Priemus, H. Decision-making on Large Infrastructure Projects: The Role of the Dutch Parliament. Transp. Plan. Technol. 2007, 30, 71–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Thio-Ac, A.; Serut, A.; Torrejos, R.; Rivo, K.; Velasco, J. 2019a Blockchain-based System Evaluation: The Effectiveness of Blockchain on E-Procurements. arXiv 2019, arXiv:1911.05399. [Google Scholar]
  42. Zachariadis, M.; Hileman, G.; Scott, S.V. Governance and control in distributed ledgers: Understanding the challenges facing blockchain technology in financial services. Inf. Organ. 2019, 29, 105–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, M. Application of blockchain in internet of things. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Cloud Computing and Security, Haikou, China, 8–10 June 2018; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 73–82. [Google Scholar]
  44. Khalfan, M.; Noor, M.A.; Maqsood, T.; Alshanbri, N.; Sagoo, A. Perceptions towards sustainable construction amongst construction contractors in state of Victoria, Australia. J. Econ. Bus. Manag. 2015, 3, 940–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Atlam, H.; Alenezi, A.; Alassafi, M.; Wills, G. Blockchain with Internet of Things: Benefits, Challenges, and Future Directions. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. 2018, 10, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ammous, S. Blockchain Technology: What Is It Good For? Bank. Financ. Law Rev. 2019, 34, 251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Antony, J.; Gupta, S. Top ten reasons for process improvement project failures. Int. J. Lean Six Sigma 2019, 10, 367–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Nowiński, W.; Kozma, M. How Can Blockchain Technology Disrupt Existing Business Models? Entrep. Bus. Econ. Rev. 2017, 5, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Asad, S.; Khalfan, M.M.A. Integration of Sustainability Issues within Construction Processes. Emir. J. Eng. Res. 2007, 12, 11–21. [Google Scholar]
  50. Khalfan, M.M.A.; Bouchlaghem, N.M.; Anumba, C.J.; Carrillo, P.M. Knowledge Management for Sustainable Construction: The C-SanD Project. In Proceedings of the Construction Research Congress—Wind of Change: Integration and Innovation, Honolulu, Hawaii, 19–21 March 2003. [Google Scholar]
  51. Welfare, A. Commercializing Blockchain: Strategic Applications in the Real World; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  52. Notheisen, B.; Cholewa, J.; Shanmugam, A. Trading Real-World Assets on Blockchain. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2017, 59, 425–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Tran, M. The Top 10 Cloud Platforms Australian Businesses Are Using. 2019. Available online: https://www.ddls.com.au/blog/the-top-10-cloud-platforms-australian-businesses-are-using/ (accessed on 3 July 2020).
  54. Christodoulou, P.; Christodoulou, K.; Andreou, A. A Decentralized Application for Logistics: Using Blockchain in Real-World Applications. Cyprus Rev. 2018, 30, 181–193. [Google Scholar]
  55. Kitchenham, B. Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews; Keele University: Keele, UK, 2004; Volume 33, pp. 1–26. [Google Scholar]
  56. Francisco, K.; Swanson, D. The Supply Chain Has No Clothes: Technology Adoption of Blockchain for Supply Chain Transparency. Logistics 2018, 2, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Lu, H.; Huang, K.; Azimi, M.; Guo, L. Blockchain technology in the oil and gas industry: A review of applications, opportunities, challenges, and risks. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 41426–41444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Oracle. Oracle, 2020f, Designed for Business User: Intelligent Track and Trace; Oracle: Austin, TX, USA, 2020; Available online: https://www.oracle.com/uk/scm/track-and-trace/ (accessed on 30 July 2020).
  59. Nagpal, S. Cryptocurrency: The Revolutionary Future Money. 2017. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3090813 (accessed on 20 December 2021).
Figure 1. Structure of Blockchain.
Figure 1. Structure of Blockchain.
Sustainability 14 05791 g001
Figure 2. Service provided by Oracle (Source: [41]).
Figure 2. Service provided by Oracle (Source: [41]).
Sustainability 14 05791 g002
Figure 3. Components of Blockchain-based E-procurement system [41].
Figure 3. Components of Blockchain-based E-procurement system [41].
Sustainability 14 05791 g003
Figure 4. Cloud/Blockchain-based E-procurement system.
Figure 4. Cloud/Blockchain-based E-procurement system.
Sustainability 14 05791 g004
Figure 5. Steps to create smart contract [30].
Figure 5. Steps to create smart contract [30].
Sustainability 14 05791 g005
Figure 6. Digital payment steps through Blockchain platform [30].
Figure 6. Digital payment steps through Blockchain platform [30].
Sustainability 14 05791 g006
Figure 7. Conceptual framework for introducing Blockchain-based E-procurement in Bangladesh.
Figure 7. Conceptual framework for introducing Blockchain-based E-procurement in Bangladesh.
Sustainability 14 05791 g007
Table 1. Issues that affect the implementation of the public sector projects.
Table 1. Issues that affect the implementation of the public sector projects.
SIIssuesThemesIdentified after Investigating Projects/SamplesSIIssuesThemesIdentified after Investigating Projects/Samples
S1Shortage of materialsManagerial15S21Contract awarded to lowest bidderLegal374
S2Unforeseen
site conditions
Managerial85S22Inadequate site investigationsManagerial85
S3Change in orders by client (variations)Legal373S23Delay of drawings and site instructionsLegal85
S4Price fluctuations (inflation)Financial85S24Unsuitable construction methodsManagerial85
S5Inaccurate estimatesFinancial and Organisational373S25Acceleration required by clientManagerial15
S6Poor site management
by contractor
Managerial15S26Change in foreign exchange rateFinancial15
S7Shortage of skilled labourOrganisational85S27Fraudulent practices, kickbacks, corruptionLegal16
S8Lack of communication between partiesManagerial
and Organisational
85S28Owner’s fund shortageFinancial71
S9Delayed payment of completed worksFinancial85S29Improper progress monitoring and cost controlLegal and Organisational70
S10Inadequate duration of contract periodLegal373S30Inaccurate time and cost estimationManagerial and Organisational70
S11Adverse weatherOrganisational85S31Inexperienced project manager (PM)/frequent transfer of PMManagerial and Organisational119
S12Construction errors/defective worksLegal15S32Information manipulation (hiding negative information)Legal and Organisational2
S13Poor contract managementLegal373S33Consultant issuesOrganisational70
S14Inappropriate government policiesLegal85S34Lack of accountability for poor decisionsLegal70
S15Work suspension owing to conflictsLegal85S35National and local politicsOrganisational71
S16Incompetent subcontractorsLegal85S36Improper planningManagerial and Organisational71
S17Inadequate pre-construction study/feasibility studyOrganisational422S37Land acquisition problemsLegal63
S18Inappropriate procurement/contract typeLegal15S38Improper cost–benefit analysis in advanceOrganisational1
S19Slow inspection of completed worksManagerial and Organisational373S39Delay from tender invitation to issuance of work orderLegal63
S20High cost of machineryFinancial85S40Improper examination of EPC/Turnkey contractLegal50
Table 2. Existing issues possible resolved by the Blockchain technology.
Table 2. Existing issues possible resolved by the Blockchain technology.
SIMitigation
(May Resolve/May Partially Resolve/Cannot Resolve)
Key Points of Argument
S1May partially resolveTracking facility will ensure arrival date of materials in the project area. However, it cannot resolve the issue if the amount of materials ordered is too low
S2Cannot resolveUnpredictable
S3May partially resolveAutomatic operation and controlling facilities will support this. However, it will depend on smart contracts
S4Cannot resolveUnpredictable, as it depends on the economy
S5May resolveAutomatic document management
Transparency and accountability
S6May resolveFast inspection will allow for identifying the future needs and possible risks
S7May partially resolveVendor management, automatic communication, and smart contracts
S8May resolveAutomatic communication feature
S9May resolveAutomatic and secured fund transfer through smart contracts
S10May resolveE-procurement; on-time tendering system; transparency and accountability; provenance of materials; and automatic document management
S11Cannot resolveUnpredictable, such as heavy rain, flood, earthquake, etc.
S12May partially resolveEnsures accountability. Blockchain is considered to be a digital ledger. It is not possible to either alter, delete, or change any information
S13May resolveAutomatic and on-time tendering system
Transparency, as all the concerned people will be responsible for making the contract
S14Cannot resolveDepends on government
S15May resolveSecured network system will ensure transparency and accountability; hence, possibility of conflict will be less
S16May resolveBlacklist could be the solution if the subcontractor is found to be incompetent
Transparency and accountability
S17May resolveBlockchain system will be able to identify the responsible person
S18May resolveA centralized and efficient team will ensure/choose the right contract type
S19May resolveBlockchain system/smart contract will mitigate the issue
S20May resolveSmart contract will ensure vendors participate in bidding process all over the world; hence, client will get a good-quality product with a low price
S21May resolveBlacklist feature will prevent the lowest bidder from taking illegal advantages
S22Cannot resolveIssue before project planning
S23May resolveSmart contract will ensure on-time delivery
S24May partially resolveProper document management, accountability will support the resolution of the issue but it cannot eliminate it totally
S25May resolveAutomatic contract management and deadline will force the team to finish within the deadline
S26Cannot resolveDepends on the economy
S27May resolveTransparency, accountability, and automatic fund transfer will resolve corruption issues. Moreover, it is not possible to either alter, delete, or change any information within Blockchain. Hence, fraudulent practices will be resolved
S28May resolveAutomatic payment system will support the proper management of the funds
S29May resolveClient will be able to track project on a daily basis
S30May resolveSmart contract and automatic document management might resolve the issue
S31Cannot resolveIt depends on personal expertise or institutional experience
S32May resolvePersonal liability will prevent information manipulation
S33May resolveInternational bidding will choose the most experienced consultant based on their previous performance
S34May resolveBlockchain system ensures accountability by default through its working principles. Moreover, it will provide the facility to identify any person
S35Cannot resolveInternal issue within a country
S36May resolveBlockchain-based document management has the potentiality to create institutional knowledge for project planning
S37Cannot resolveDepends on the land law of the country
S38Cannot resolveDepends on the context
S39May resolveDue to smart contracts, no one will be allowed to delay any tasks
S40May resolveTransparency, accountability, employee liability, and smart contracts will ensure the proper examination of EPC contracts
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Khalfan, M.; Azizi, N.; Haass, O.; Maqsood, T.; Ahmed, I. Blockchain Technology: Potential Applications for Public Sector E-Procurement and Project Management. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105791

AMA Style

Khalfan M, Azizi N, Haass O, Maqsood T, Ahmed I. Blockchain Technology: Potential Applications for Public Sector E-Procurement and Project Management. Sustainability. 2022; 14(10):5791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105791

Chicago/Turabian Style

Khalfan, Malik, Neda Azizi, Omid Haass, Tayyab Maqsood, and Istiaq Ahmed. 2022. "Blockchain Technology: Potential Applications for Public Sector E-Procurement and Project Management" Sustainability 14, no. 10: 5791. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105791

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop