Visualizing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Scientometric Review
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Material Collection
2.1.1. Retrieval Strategy
2.1.2. Retrieval Process
2.2. Methods
3. Results
3.1. Social Structure of SSCM Field
3.1.1. Co-Authorship Network
3.1.2. Co-Authors’ Institutions Network
3.2. Conceptual Structure of SSCM Field
3.2.1. Co-Occurring Keywords Network
3.2.2. Keywords Burst Analysis
3.3. Intellectual Structure of SSCM Field
3.3.1. Author Co-Citation Network
3.3.2. Journal Co-Citation Network
3.3.3. Document Co-Citation Network
3.3.4. Bursts in the Network of Document Co-Citations
4. Conclusions and Discussion
4.1. Main Findings and Contributions
4.2. Limitations and Future Researches
Author Contributions
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Alkahtani, M.; Omair, M.; Khalid, Q.S.; Hussain, G.; Ahmad, I.; Pruncu, C. A COVID-19 Supply Chain Management Strategy Based on Variable Production under Uncertain Environment Conditions. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Babagolzadeh, M.; Shrestha, A.; Abbasi, B.; Zhang, Y.H.; Woodhead, A.; Zhang, A.M. Sustainable cold supply chain management under demand uncertainty and carbon tax regulation. Transport. Res. Part D Transport. Environ. 2020, 80, 102245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, J.; Xiao, T.J.; Tian, C.; Wang, H.M. Ordering and returns handling decisions and coordination in a supply chain with demand uncertainty. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2020, 27, 1033–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Meixell, M.J.; Luoma, P. Stakeholder pressure in sustainable supply chain management A systematic review. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2015, 45, 69–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Roehrich, J.K.; Grosvold, J.; Hoejmose, S.U. Reputational risks and sustainable supply chain management Decision making under bounded rationality. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2014, 34, 695–719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Z.F.; Zhai, S.J.; Hong, J.T.; Zhang, Y.B.; Shi, K.R. Building Sustainable Supply Chains for Organizations Based on QFD: A Case Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 2834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mousa, S.K.; Othman, M. The impact of green human resource management practices on sustainable performance in healthcare organisations: A conceptual framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pham, N.T.; Hoang, H.T.; Phan, Q.P.T. Green human resource management: A comprehensive review and future research agenda. Int. J. Manpow. 2020, 41, 845–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, W.T.; Chavez, R.; Feng, M.Y.; Wong, C.Y.; Fynes, B. Green human resource management and environmental cooperation: An ability-motivation-opportunity and contingency perspective. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2020, 219, 224–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, P.K.; Ye, Y. Implementation strategy of environmental management systems in supply chains. Prod. Plan. Control. 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mungai, E.M.; Ndiritu, S.W.; Rajwani, T. Do voluntary environmental management systems improve environmental performance? Evidence from waste management by Kenyan firms. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 265, 121636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Luthra, S.; Govindan, K.; Kannan, D.; Mangla, S.K.; Garg, C.P. An integrated framework for sustainable supplier selection and evaluation in supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 1686–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mohammed, A.; Harris, I.; Govindan, K. A hybrid MCDM-FMOO approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019, 217, 171–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, W.Y.; Xu, Z.T.; Liu, H.C. Developing sustainable supplier selection criteria for solar air-conditioner manufacturer: An integrated approach. Renew. Sustain. Energ. Rev. 2017, 79, 1461–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagell, M.; Shevchenko, A. Why Research in Sustainable Supply Chain Management Should Have no Future. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2014, 50, 44–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cole, R.; Stevenson, M.; Aitken, J. Blockchain technology: Implications for operations and supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. 2019, 24, 469–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Saberi, S.; Kouhizadeh, M.; Sarkis, J.; Shen, L.J. Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2019, 57, 2117–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Z.H.; Ming, X.G.; Zhou, T.T.; Chang, Y. Sustainable supplier selection for smart supply chain considering internal and external uncertainty: An integrated rough-fuzzy approach. Appl. Soft Comput. 2020, 87, 106004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jain, N.; Singh, A.R. Sustainable supplier selection under must-be criteria through Fuzzy inference system. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peng, J.J.; Tian, C.; Zhang, W.Y.; Zhang, S.; Wang, J.Q. An Integrated Multi-criteria Decision-making Framework For Sustainable Supplier Selection Under Picture Fuzzy Environment. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2020, 26, 573–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tirkolaee, E.B.; Mardani, A.; Dashtian, Z.; Soltani, M.; Weber, G.W. A novel hybrid method using fuzzy decision making and multi-objective programming for sustainable-reliable supplier selection in two-echelon supply chain design. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 250, 119517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hong, J.T.; Guo, P.J.; Chen, M.M.; Li, Y.T. The adoption of sustainable supply chain management and the role of organisational culture: A Chinese perspective. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2020, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kumar, A.; Moktadir, M.A.; Khan, S.A.R.; Garza-Reyes, J.A.; Tyagi, M.; Kazancoglu, Y. Behavioral factors on the adoption of sustainable supply chain practices. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 158, 104818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rodthong, W.; Kuwornu, J.K.M.; Datta, A.; Anal, A.K.; Tsusaka, T.W. Factors Influencing the Intensity of Adoption of the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil Practices by Smallholder Farmers in Thailand. Environ. Manag. 2020, 66, 377–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brammer, S.; He, H.W.; Mellahi, K. Corporate Social Responsibility, Employee Organizational Identification, and Creative Effort: The Moderating Impact of Corporate Ability. Group Organ. Manag. 2015, 40, 323–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoejmose, S.; Brammer, S.; Millington, A. “Green” supply chain management: The role of trust and top management in B2B and B2C markets. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2012, 41, 609–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hoejmose, S.U.; Roehrich, J.K.; Grosvold, J. Is doing more doing better? The relationship between responsible supply chain management and corporate reputation. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2014, 43, 77–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Brammer, S.; Walker, H. Sustainable procurement in the public sector: An international comparative study. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag. 2011, 31, 452–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seuring, S.; Muller, M. From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2008, 16, 1699–1710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, C.R.; Rogers, D.S. A framework of sustainable supply chain management: Moving toward new theory. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2008, 38, 360–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahi, P.; Searcy, C. A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 52, 329–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grosvold, J.; Hoejmose, S.U.; Roehrich, J.K. Squaring the circle Management, measurement and performance of sustainability in supply chains. Supply Chain Manag. 2014, 19, 292–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paliwal, V.; Chandra, S.; Sharma, S. Blockchain Technology for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Literature Review and a Classification Framework. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Koberg, E.; Longoni, A. A systematic review of sustainable supply chain management in global supply chains. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 207, 1084–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Masoumi, S.M.; Kazemi, N.; Abdul-Rashid, S.H. Sustainable Supply Chain Management in the Automotive Industry: A Process-Oriented Review. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Z.; Yin, Y.; Liu, W.; Dunford, M. Visualizing the intellectual structure and evolution of innovation systems research: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2015, 103, 135–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, C.R.; Washispack, S. Mapping the Path Forward for Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Review of Reviews. J. Bus. Logist. 2018, 39, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nimsai, S.; Yoopetch, C.; Lai, P. Mapping the Knowledge Base of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Bibliometric Literature Review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C. Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J. Data Inf. Sci. 2017, 2, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.; Dubin, R.; Kim, M.C. Orphan drugs and rare diseases: A scientometric review (2000–2014). Expert Opin. Orphan Drugs 2014, 2, 709–724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.M.; Hu, Z.G.; Liu, S.B.; Tseng, H. Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2012, 12, 593–608. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.M.; Song, M. Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scientometric reviews. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0223994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ansari, Z.N.; Kant, R. A state-of-art literature review reflecting 15 years of focus on sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 2524–2543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanchez-Flores, R.B.; Cruz-Sotelo, S.E.; Ojeda-Benitez, S.; Ramirez-Barreto, M.E. Sustainable Supply Chain Management-A Literature Review on Emerging Economies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.J.; Ma, E.; Qu, H.L. Knowledge mapping of hospitality research—A visual analysis using CiteSpace. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2017, 60, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bouazzaoui, M.; Wu, H.J.; Roehrich, J.K.; Squire, B.; Roath, A.S. Justice in inter-organizational relationships: A literature review and future research agenda. Ind. Mark. Manag. 2020, 87, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patel, A.B.; Desai, T.N. A systematic review and meta-analysis of recent developments in sustainable supply chain management. Int. J. Logist. Res. Appl. 2019, 22, 349–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, W.; Lu, C. Visualization analysis of big data research based on Citespace. Soft Comput. 2020, 24, 8173–8186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Svensson, G. Aspects of sustainable supply chain management (SSCM): Conceptual framework and empirical example. Supply Chain Manag. 2007, 12, 262–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geldermann, J.; Treitz, M.; Rentz, O. Towards sustainable production networks. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2007, 45, 4207–4224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C. A Glimpse of the First Eight Months of the COVID-19 Literature on Microsoft Academic Graph: Themes, Citation Contexts, and Uncertainties. Front. Res. Metr. Anal. 2020, 5, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.M.; Dubin, R.; Kim, M.C. Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: A scientometric update (2000–2014). Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 2014, 14, 1295–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cobo, M.J.; Lopez-Herrera, A.G.; Herrera-Viedma, E.; Herrera, F. Science Mapping Software Tools: Review, Analysis, and Cooperative Study Among Tools. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2011, 62, 1382–1402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, C.; Ji, X.H.; Luo, X.G. Visualizing Hotspots and Future Trends in Phytomining Research Through Scientometrics. Sustainability 2020, 12, 4593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkis, J.; Zhu, Q.H.; Lai, K.H. An organizational theoretic review of green supply chain management literature. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2011, 130, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Govindan, K.; Azevedo, S.G.; Carvalho, H.; Cruz-Machado, V. Impact of supply chain management practices on sustainability. J. Clean. Prod. 2014, 85, 212–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Eisenhardt, K.M.; Graebner, M.E. Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Acad. Manag. J. 2007, 50, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, J.; Zhang, H.; Dong, W. A review of emerging trends in global PPP research: Analysis and visualization. Scientometrics 2016, 107, 1111–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, R.; Wong, C.W.Y.; Miao, X. Analysis of the trend in the knowledge of environmental responsibility research. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 278, 123402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mardani, A.; Kannan, D.; Hooker, R.E.; Ozkul, S.; Alrasheedi, M.; Tirkolaee, E.B. Evaluation of green and sustainable supply chain management using structural equation modelling: A systematic review of the state of the art literature and recommendations for future research. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 249, 119383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ali, I.; Stevi, E.; Karamasa, C.; Puka, A. A Novel Integrated Fuzzy PIPRECIA–Interval Rough Saw Model: Green Supplier Selection. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 2020, 3, 126–145. [Google Scholar]
- Chattopadhyay, R.; Chakraborty, S.; Chakraborty, S. An integrated D-MARCOS method for supplier selection in an iron and steel industry. Decis. Mak. Appl. Manag. Eng. 2020, 3, 49–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durmi, E. The Evaluation of the Criteria for Sustainable Supplier Selection by Using the FUCOM Method. Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl. 2019, 2, 91–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Durmić, E.; Stević, Ž.; Chatterjee, P.; Vasiljević, M.; Tomašević, M. Sustainable supplier selection using combined FUCOM—Rough SAW model. Rep. Mech. Eng. 2020, 1, 34–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, L.-J.; Liu, R.; Liu, H.-C.; Shi, H. Green Supplier Evaluation and Selections: A State-of-the-Art Literature Review of Models, Methods, and Applications. Math. Probl. Eng. 2020, 2020, 1783421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schramm, V.B.; Barros Cabral, L.P.; Schramm, F. Approaches for supporting sustainable supplier selection—A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 273, 123089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ecer, F.; Pamucar, D. Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 266, 121981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hendiani, S.; Mahmoudi, A.; Liao, H. A multi-stage multi-criteria hierarchical decision-making approach for sustainable supplier selection. Appl. Soft Comput. 2020, 94, 106456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannan, D.; Mina, H.; Nosrati-Abarghooee, S.; Khosrojerdi, G. Sustainable circular supplier selection: A novel hybrid approach. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 722, 137936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Genovese, A.; Acquaye, A.A.; Figueroa, A.; Koh, S.C.L. Sustainable supply chain management and the transition towards a circular economy: Evidence and some applications. Omega 2017, 66, 344–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Geissdoerfer, M.; Savaget, P.; Bocken, N.M.P.; Hultink, E.J. The Circular Economy A new sustainability paradigm? J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 757–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Moktadir, M.A.; Ahmadi, H.B.; Sultana, R.; Fatema Tuj, Z.; Liou, J.J.H.; Rezaei, J. Circular economy practices in the leather industry: A practical step towards sustainable development. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 251, 119737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, D.; Shah, J. Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 164, 319–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qian, X.H.; Chan, F.T.S.; Zhang, J.H.; Yin, M.Q.; Zhang, Q.Y. Channel coordination of a two-echelon sustainable supply chain with a fair-minded retailer under cap-and-trade regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.T.; Chen, Y.Y.; Bai, Q.G. A two-echelon sustainable supply chain coordination under cap-and-trade regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 135, 42–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ghosh, S.K.; Seikh, M.R.; Chakrabortty, M. Analyzing a stochastic dual-channel supply chain under consumers’ low carbon preferences and cap-and-trade regulation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 149, 106765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, Z.R.; Brownlee, A.E.I.; Wu, Q.H. Production and joint emission reduction decisions based on two-way cost-sharing contract under cap-and-trade regulation. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2020, 146, 106549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Du, S.F.; Tang, W.Z.; Song, M. Low-carbon production with low-carbon premium in cap-and-trade regulation. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 134, 652–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, R.H.; Yang, L. Impacts of financing mechanism and power structure on supply chains under cap-and-trade regulation. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 139, 101957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, S.C.E.; Chen, Y.C. When Blockchain Meets Supply Chain: A Systematic Literature Review on Current Development and Potential Applications. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 62478–62494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kayikci, Y.; Subramanian, N.; Dora, M.; Bhatia, M.S. Food supply chain in the era of Industry 4.0: Blockchain technology implementation opportunities and impediments from the perspective of people, process, performance, and technology. Prod. Plan. Control 2020, 21, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Orji, I.J.; Kusi-Sarpong, S.; Huang, S.F.; Vazquez-Brust, D. Evaluating the factors that influence blockchain adoption in the freight logistics industry. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 141, 102025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ar, I.M.; Erol, I.; Peker, I.; Ozdemir, A.; Medeni, T.D.; Medeni, I.T. Evaluating the feasibility of blockchain in logistics operations: A decision framework. Expert Syst. Appl. 2020, 158, 113543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Carter, C.R.; Easton, P.L. Sustainable supply chain management: Evolution and future directions. Int. J. Phys. Distrib. Logist. Manag. 2011, 41, 46–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gold, S.; Seuring, S.; Beske, P. Sustainable Supply Chain Management and Inter-Organizational Resources: A Literature Review. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2010, 17, 230–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Seuring, S. A review of modeling approaches for sustainable supply chain management. Decis. Support. Syst. 2013, 54, 1513–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sarkis, J. A boundaries and flows perspective of green supply chain management. Supply Chain Manag. 2012, 17, 202–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bai, C.; Sarkis, J. Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with grey system and rough set methodologies. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2010, 124, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buyukozkan, G.; Cifci, G. A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Comput. Ind. 2011, 62, 164–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buyukozkan, G.; Cifci, G. A novel hybrid MCDM approach based on fuzzy DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP and fuzzy TOPSIS to evaluate green suppliers. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 3000–3011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tate, W.L.; Ellram, L.M.; Kirchoff, J.F. Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: A Thematic Analysis Related to Supply Chain Management. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2010, 46, 19–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Golicic, S.L.; Smith, C.D. A Meta-Analysis of Environmentally Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Firm Performance. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2013, 49, 78–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pagell, M.; Wu, Z.; Wasserman, M.E. Thinking Differently about Purchasing Portfolios. An Assessment of Sustainable Sourcing. J. Supply Chain Manag. 2010, 46, 57–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta, P.; Choi, T.M.; Somani, S.; Butala, R. Blockchain technology in supply chain operations: Applications, challenges and research opportunities. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 142, 102067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sanders, N.R.; Ganeshan, R. Big Data in Supply Chain Management. Prod. Oper. Manag. 2018, 27, 1745–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Farooq, M.U.; Hussain, A.; Masood, T.; Habib, M.S. Supply Chain Operations Management in Pandemics: A State-of-the-Art Review Inspired by COVID-19. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
No. | Count | Keywords | Centrality | Keywords |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1359 | sustainability | 0.47 | supply chain |
2 | 573 | supply chain management | 0.42 | sustainable supply chain management |
3 | 446 | supply chain | 0.42 | reverse logistics |
4 | 345 | sustainable development | 0.38 | strategy |
5 | 322 | circular economy | 0.32 | corporate social responsibility |
6 | 203 | corporate social responsibility | 0.31 | sustainability |
7 | 203 | sustainable supply chain | 0.31 | corporate sustainability |
8 | 196 | literature review | 0.31 | supplier management |
9 | 184 | sustainable supply chain management | 0.29 | sustainable development |
10 | 170 | green supply chain management | 0.29 | sustainable supply chain |
11 | 158 | green supply chain | 0.29 | green supply chain |
12 | 155 | supplier selection | 0.29 | social sustainability |
13 | 143 | case study | 0.29 | innovation |
14 | 132 | reverse logistics | 0.29 | resilience |
15 | 114 | china | 0.28 | social responsibility |
16 | 109 | blockchain | 0.24 | manufacturing |
17 | 107 | environmental management | 0.23 | triple bottom line |
18 | 107 | closed-loop supply chain | 0.2 | circular economy |
19 | 106 | systematic literature review | 0.2 | case study |
20 | 103 | dematel | 0.18 | fuzzy set theory |
No. | Keywords | Strength | Begin | End | 2007–2021 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | supply chain management | 25.39 | 2008 | 2013 | ▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
2 | environmental management | 22.05 | 2009 | 2015 | ▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
3 | social responsibility | 11.21 | 2010 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
4 | transportation | 4.99 | 2010 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
5 | supplier management | 4.79 | 2010 | 2013 | ▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
6 | eco-efficiency | 3.88 | 2010 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
7 | environmental issue | 3.18 | 2010 | 2012 | ▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
8 | logistics | 12.12 | 2011 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
9 | risk management | 6.78 | 2011 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
10 | strategy | 5.54 | 2011 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
11 | manufacturing | 3.23 | 2011 | 2012 | ▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
12 | environment | 9.37 | 2012 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
13 | survey | 5.2 | 2012 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
14 | supply chain management | 5 | 2012 | 2013 | ▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
15 | ahp | 5.5 | 2013 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
16 | corporate sustainability | 5.06 | 2013 | 2018 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂ |
17 | procurement | 4.89 | 2013 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
18 | stakeholder theory | 4.4 | 2013 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
19 | collaboration | 12.39 | 2014 | 2017 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂ |
20 | barrier | 4.62 | 2015 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
21 | performance | 7.27 | 2016 | 2017 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂▂▂ |
22 | game theory | 7.26 | 2018 | 2021 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃ |
23 | stakeholder | 6.63 | 2018 | 2019 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂ |
24 | triple bottom line | 4.37 | 2018 | 2019 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▂▂ |
25 | circular economy | 22.22 | 2019 | 2021 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃ |
No. | Source | Frequency | % | ABS 2018 |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Journal of Cleaner Production | 1434 | 15.67 | 2 |
2 | Sustainability | 1003 | 10.96 | --- |
3 | International Journal of Production Economics | 349 | 3.81 | 3 |
4 | International Journal of Production Research | 263 | 2.87 | 3 |
5 | Business Strategy and the Environment | 200 | 2.19 | 3 |
6 | Supply Chain Management-an International Journal | 174 | 1.90 | 3 |
7 | Computers & Industrial Engineering | 161 | 1.76 | 2 |
8 | Production Planning & Control | 158 | 1.73 | 3 |
9 | Resources Conservation and Recycling | 153 | 1.67 | --- |
10 | International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management | 134 | 1.46 | 2 |
ID | Size | % | Silhouette | Start | Stop | Duration | Mean | Label (LLR) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 361 | 15.51 | 0.738 | 2005 | 2019 | 15 | 2009 | Chinese manufacturer |
1 | 244 | 10.49 | 0.816 | 2010 | 2020 | 11 | 2014 | sustainable supply chain management |
2 | 230 | 9.88 | 0.77 | 2008 | 2019 | 12 | 2013 | green supply chain management |
3 | 200 | 8.59 | 0.873 | 2005 | 2020 | 16 | 2013 | sustainable supplier selection |
4 | 157 | 6.75 | 0.972 | 2013 | 2020 | 8 | 2017 | circular economy |
5 | 151 | 6.49 | 0.945 | 2010 | 2020 | 11 | 2016 | and-trade regulation |
6 | 149 | 6.40 | 0.854 | 2008 | 2019 | 12 | 2012 | closed-loop supply chain |
7 | 91 | 3.91 | 0.976 | 2002 | 2009 | 8 | 2005 | sustainable production network |
8 | 84 | 3.61 | 0.99 | 2015 | 2020 | 6 | 2018 | blockchain technology |
9 | 68 | 2.92 | 0.949 | 2004 | 2014 | 11 | 2006 | supply chain management profession |
10 | 57 | 2.45 | 0.948 | 2012 | 2020 | 9 | 2015 | big data analytics |
11 | 55 | 2.36 | 0.966 | 2008 | 2018 | 11 | 2013 | corporate sustainability strategies |
12 | 47 | 2.02 | 0.92 | 2013 | 2020 | 8 | 2016 | COVID-19 pandemic |
13 | 46 | 1.98 | 0.928 | 2010 | 2018 | 9 | 2013 | supply chain resilience |
14 | 33 | 1.42 | 0.938 | 2011 | 2019 | 9 | 2016 | green human resource management |
15 | 31 | 1.33 | 0.989 | 2015 | 2020 | 6 | 2017 | best-worst method |
16 | 15 | 0.64 | 0.994 | 2006 | 2010 | 5 | 2007 | logistics issue |
21 | 10 | 0.43 | 0.997 | 2013 | 2017 | 5 | 2015 | energy efficiency |
26 | 5 | 0.21 | 1 | 2017 | 2020 | 4 | 2018 | logistics performance |
Author | Year | Source | Strength | Begin | End | 2007–2021 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Seuring S | 2008 | J CLEAN PROD | 139.32 | 2009 | 2013 | ▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
Carter CR | 2008 | INT J PHYS DISTR LOG | 79.65 | 2009 | 2013 | ▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
Seuring SA | 2008 | SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG | 26.48 | 2009 | 2013 | ▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
Pagell M | 2009 | J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG | 60.89 | 2010 | 2014 | ▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
Bai C | 2010 | INT J PROD ECON | 37.2 | 2010 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
Gold S | 2010 | CORP SOC RESP ENV MA | 40.44 | 2011 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
Tate WL | 2010 | J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG | 39.38 | 2011 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
Pagell M | 2010 | J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG | 34.65 | 2011 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
Reuter C | 2010 | J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG | 30.44 | 2011 | 2015 | ▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂▂ |
Sarkis J | 2011 | INT J PROD ECON | 84.83 | 2012 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
Carter CR | 2011 | INT J PHYS DISTR LOG | 65.02 | 2012 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
Buyukozkan G | 2011 | COMPUT IND | 31.53 | 2012 | 2016 | ▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂▂ |
Green KW | 2012 | SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG | 33.35 | 2013 | 2017 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂ |
Walker H | 2012 | SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG | 27.65 | 2013 | 2017 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂ |
Buyukozkan | 2012 | EXPERT SYST APPL | 23.48 | 2013 | 2017 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂ |
Sarkis J | 2012 | SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG | 23.1 | 2013 | 2017 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂ |
Miemczyk J | 2012 | SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG | 22.72 | 2013 | 2017 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂▂ |
Seuring S | 2013 | DECIS SUPPORT SYST | 56.72 | 2014 | 2018 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂ |
Ahi P | 2013 | J CLEAN PROD | 50.79 | 2014 | 2018 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂ |
Golicic SL | 2013 | J SUPPLY CHAIN MANAG | 32.08 | 2014 | 2018 | ▂▂▂▂▂▂▂▃▃▃▃▃▂▂▂ |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Su, Z.; Zhang, M.; Wu, W. Visualizing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Scientometric Review. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084409
Su Z, Zhang M, Wu W. Visualizing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Scientometric Review. Sustainability. 2021; 13(8):4409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084409
Chicago/Turabian StyleSu, Zhiwen, Mingyu Zhang, and Wenbing Wu. 2021. "Visualizing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Scientometric Review" Sustainability 13, no. 8: 4409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084409
APA StyleSu, Z., Zhang, M., & Wu, W. (2021). Visualizing Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Systematic Scientometric Review. Sustainability, 13(8), 4409. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084409