Next Article in Journal
Teacher Professional Development: Experiences in an International Project on Intercultural Education
Next Article in Special Issue
The Psychology of Sharing: Multigroup Analysis among Users and Non-Users of Carsharing
Previous Article in Journal
Chloride Binding Capacity and Its Effect on the Microstructure of Mortar Made with Marine Sand
Previous Article in Special Issue
Intentions to Participate in Carsharing: The Role of Self- and Social Identity
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Trust and Sharing in Online Environments: A Comparative Study of Different Groups of Norwegian Car Sharers

by
Tom Erik Julsrud
1,* and
Tanu Priya Uteng
2
1
CICERO Center for International Climate Research, 0349 Oslo, Norway
2
Institute of Transport Economics, 0349 Oslo, Norway
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(8), 4170; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084170
Submission received: 7 February 2021 / Revised: 2 April 2021 / Accepted: 3 April 2021 / Published: 8 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Shared Mobility)

Abstract

Though multiple studies have explored the phenomenon of car sharing, very few have indulged into exploring how different forms of trust varies between users of different business models. We address this research gap through employing quantitative data analyses of car sharers in Norway. Results show that the levels of ingroup and outgroup-trust (i.e., trust towards friends/family or unfamiliar persons) are markedly low for the members of the peer-to-peer scheme (M = 3.4/2.9) as compared to the cooperative (M = 6.0/4.8) and business-to-consumer scheme (M = 5.7/4.4). In contrast, technology-based trust is more important for the P2P sharers (M = 5.8) than cooperative (M = 5.6) and the B2C users (M = 5.6). Our findings echo previous studies, indicating that a different set of institutional logics is driving the transactions at the emerging P2P platforms compared to former non-profit sharing communities.
Keywords: car sharing; trust; peer-to-peer; institutional logic; collaborative consumption car sharing; trust; peer-to-peer; institutional logic; collaborative consumption

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Julsrud, T.E.; Priya Uteng, T. Trust and Sharing in Online Environments: A Comparative Study of Different Groups of Norwegian Car Sharers. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084170

AMA Style

Julsrud TE, Priya Uteng T. Trust and Sharing in Online Environments: A Comparative Study of Different Groups of Norwegian Car Sharers. Sustainability. 2021; 13(8):4170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084170

Chicago/Turabian Style

Julsrud, Tom Erik, and Tanu Priya Uteng. 2021. "Trust and Sharing in Online Environments: A Comparative Study of Different Groups of Norwegian Car Sharers" Sustainability 13, no. 8: 4170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084170

APA Style

Julsrud, T. E., & Priya Uteng, T. (2021). Trust and Sharing in Online Environments: A Comparative Study of Different Groups of Norwegian Car Sharers. Sustainability, 13(8), 4170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084170

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop