Next Article in Journal
Effects of the Climate Change on Peripheral Populations of Hydrophytes: A Sensitivity Analysis for European Plant Species Based on Climate Preferences
Next Article in Special Issue
Cognitive Biases in Building Energy Decisions
Previous Article in Journal
Airport Self-Service Technologies, Passenger Self-Concept, and Behavior: An Attributional View
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Complex Occupant Behavior Models on Cooling Energy Usage Analysis
Review

The Role of Occupants in Buildings’ Energy Performance Gap: Myth or Reality?

1
Department of Building Physics and Building Ecology, TU Wien, 1040 Vienna, Austria
2
Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University, Bute Building, King Edward VII Ave., Cardiff CF10 3NB, UK
3
Department of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
4
Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu Dhabi 127788, United Arab Emirates
5
Thermal Engineering for the Built Environment Laboratory (TEBEL), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Passage du Cardinal 13B, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
6
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, Norway
7
Research Institute CENERGIE—Center for Energy Efficient Buildings and Districts, Department 05: Building Services Engineering, Munich University of Applied Sciences, Lothstr. 34, 80335 Munich, Germany
8
Division of Sustainability, Energy and Indoor Environment, Department of the Built Environment, Aalborg University, A. C. Meyers Vænge 15, 2450 Copenhagen, Denmark
9
Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 1PZ, UK
10
School of Architecture and Built Environment, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3220, Australia
11
Software Engineering Section, Mærsk Mckinney Møller Institute, University of Southern Denmark, 5230 Odense, Denmark
12
Institute for Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany
13
Arbnco Ltd., Glasgow G1 1RD, UK
14
Division of Building Services Engineering, Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, SE-412 96 Göteborg, Sweden
15
Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A4, Canada
16
Research Group Building Physics, Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Antonio Caggiano and Francesco Leccese
Sustainability 2021, 13(6), 3146; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063146
Received: 22 January 2021 / Revised: 25 February 2021 / Accepted: 9 March 2021 / Published: 12 March 2021
Buildings’ expected (projected, simulated) energy use frequently does not match actual observations. This is commonly referred to as the energy performance gap. As such, many factors can contribute to the disagreement between expectations and observations. These include, for instance, uncertainty about buildings’ geometry, construction, systems, and weather conditions. However, the role of occupants in the energy performance gap has recently attracted much attention. It has even been suggested that occupants are the main cause of the energy performance gap. This, in turn, has led to suggestions that better models of occupant behavior can reduce the energy performance gap. The present effort aims at the review and evaluation of the evidence for such claims. To this end, a systematic literature search was conducted and relevant publications were identified and reviewed in detail. The review entailed the categorization of the studies according to the scope and strength of the evidence for occupants’ role in the energy performance gap. Moreover, deployed calculation and monitoring methods, normalization procedures, and reported causes and magnitudes of the energy performance gap were documented and evaluated. The results suggest that the role of occupants as significant or exclusive contributors to the energy performance gap is not sufficiently substantiated by evidence. View Full-Text
Keywords: buildings; performance gap; energy; occupant behavior buildings; performance gap; energy; occupant behavior
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Mahdavi, A.; Berger, C.; Amin, H.; Ampatzi, E.; Andersen, R.K.; Azar, E.; Barthelmes, V.M.; Favero, M.; Hahn, J.; Khovalyg, D.; Knudsen, H.N.; Luna-Navarro, A.; Roetzel, A.; Sangogboye, F.C.; Schweiker, M.; Taheri, M.; Teli, D.; Touchie, M.; Verbruggen, S. The Role of Occupants in Buildings’ Energy Performance Gap: Myth or Reality? Sustainability 2021, 13, 3146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063146

AMA Style

Mahdavi A, Berger C, Amin H, Ampatzi E, Andersen RK, Azar E, Barthelmes VM, Favero M, Hahn J, Khovalyg D, Knudsen HN, Luna-Navarro A, Roetzel A, Sangogboye FC, Schweiker M, Taheri M, Teli D, Touchie M, Verbruggen S. The Role of Occupants in Buildings’ Energy Performance Gap: Myth or Reality? Sustainability. 2021; 13(6):3146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063146

Chicago/Turabian Style

Mahdavi, Ardeshir, Christiane Berger, Hadeer Amin, Eleni Ampatzi, Rune K. Andersen, Elie Azar, Verena M. Barthelmes, Matteo Favero, Jakob Hahn, Dolaana Khovalyg, Henrik N. Knudsen, Alessandra Luna-Navarro, Astrid Roetzel, Fisayo C. Sangogboye, Marcel Schweiker, Mahnameh Taheri, Despoina Teli, Marianne Touchie, and Silke Verbruggen. 2021. "The Role of Occupants in Buildings’ Energy Performance Gap: Myth or Reality?" Sustainability 13, no. 6: 3146. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063146

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop