Next Article in Journal
Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation of the Critical Success Factors for the Sustainability of Public Private Partnership Projects in China
Next Article in Special Issue
An Investigation upon Industry 4.0 and Society 5.0 within the Context of Sustainable Development Goals
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Certificate Verification Scheme for Smart Grid using Fog Computing (FONICA)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Social Media Usage by Different Generations as a Tool for Sustainable Tourism Marketing in Society 5.0 Idea
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Digital Post Ecosystem—Example of Poland in the Context of Research

by
Anna Drab-Kurowska
* and
Agnieszka Budziewicz-Guźlecka
*
Institute of Spatial Management and Socio-Economic Geography, University of Szczecin, 71-101 Szczecin, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sustainability 2021, 13(5), 2550; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052550
Submission received: 25 January 2021 / Revised: 15 February 2021 / Accepted: 19 February 2021 / Published: 26 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Society 5.0 and Industry 4.0 Relations and Implications)

Abstract

:
Rapid technological changes have forced postal operators to adapt their services to the needs of the information society, exploit new business opportunities, and pay more attention to emerging and rapidly growing direct and indirect competition. The main goal of the article is to provide an answer to the question Do we have to digitalize postal services? The objectives of the article are as follows: defining of the postal ecosystem concept; defining of postal e-services; developing an action proposal approach for the operator designated to create a digital ecosystem of the postal service. Therefore, it is necessary to survey postal operators regarding the digitalization of the economy and postal e-services. The survey should focus on individual customers, businesses and telecommunications market experts. The survey covered postal e-services supplied by the designated operator in Poland. Its assessment has been based on variables which have major impact on the perception of postal e-services. These variables include: scope of e-services, regulatory framework (security), competitiveness, telecommunications infrastructure, advancement of e-services, innovation level, and digital awareness and digital skills in the society. In order to meet these objectives, the article refers to the essence of the ecosystem as a solution to the research problem. Additionally, studies on postal e-services have been presented, which enable to develop an action proposal to strengthen the position of the postal operator in the postal ecosystem. The article is based on studies that use various research methods, such as critical analysis of scientific literature, synthesis and generalization, Delphi method, versatile benchmarking and graphic visualization. Additionally, findings of studies on e-services have been presented to cover the European Union, as well as solicit opinions of individual and business clients and telecommunications market experts in Poland. This enables to develop an action proposal designed to strengthen the position of the postal operator in the postal ecosystem. The study has delivered an answer to the research question. Thus, the authors can confirm that it is necessary to digitalize postal services.

1. Introduction

Postal e-services should be developed by Polish and European postal operators in the future. Some of the EU member states have demonstrated that these services are used by national governments to exchange correspondence and documents with citizens and to provide them with wider e-services. Additionally, such services enable to store official correspondence on a dedicated platform. It should be stressed that today, when virtual exchange of correspondence has been growing, a modern state should adapt its potential to the trend and provide citizens with an efficient digital service.
Both in Poland and elsewhere in Europe, the digitalization level of postal operators remains low. Therefore, it is necessary to develop modern technologies dedicated to postal e-services.
A question should be asked: Is the digitalization of postal services necessary? To respond to the question, a survey was designed to examine opinions of postal operators regarding the digitalization of the economy and postal e-services. The survey also covered individual customers, businesses and telecommunications market experts. According to survey findings, a solution that could improve the provision of e-services is a digital ecosystem that promotes postal e-services. This ecosystem can be based on platform technologies and involve a single provider of a stable platform, businesses and people—product providers, platform-based services and end-users. It should be pointed out that the digital ecosystem can be a scalable and, to some extent, self-organizing market.

2. The Idea of the Business Ecosystem

The notion of ecosystem has been introduced in modern research into social and economic systems in the last decade [1,2]. Concepts such as an industrial ecosystem, a digital business ecosystem, an economy as an ecosystem or a social ecosystem have been subjects of many scientific discussions [3,4,5,6]. The concept of a business ecosystem has developed toward digital ecosystems, innovative service ecosystems etc. Business ecosystem concepts are an extension of the value chain theory [7,8]. Apart from elements of the value chain, according to J.F. Moore [9], who created the concept, the business ecosystem includes other organizations and stakeholders, such as administration, industry institutions and customers, and interactions between them. According to the concept, the performance of business ecosystem organizations depends not only on their own competences but also on interactions with other actors and the condition of the ecosystem [10,11,12]. Figure 1 shows business ecosystem tiers. According to Moore [9,13,14], they correspond to different levels of business activity.
The main tier, corresponding to the core business activity or a network of enterprises, including postal companies, comprises key players and resources needed. In addition to traditional supply chain components, the next tier (expanded activity) includes various actors, such as customers, suppliers and industry standardization bodies. The most external tier of the business ecosystem encompasses research institutions, universities, investors and other stakeholders who, without being directly involved in the core activity, can influence market success [16]. A similar role is played by external forces, such as competition and co-operation, politics and legal environment, social and technological changes, and research and customer needs.
It should be noted that the literature does not provide a precise and unambiguous definition of the business ecosystem. However, some concepts identify features characteristic for all business ecosystems. Therefore, typical features of the business ecosystem are [3,4,9,15,17,18]:
  • large number of organizations comprising the ecosystem,
  • interrelations,
  • sharing of knowledge (and other resources), interdependence and cooperation between various actors and, at the same time, strong competition (coopetition),
  • specific roles and positions of ecosystem members, where a change (position) of one element affects the other, multi-directional and complex impacts of external forces (e.g., politics, technologies, markets, human resources, customers etc.) on businesses operating within the ecosystem,
  • dynamic structure, ability to evolve and develop the entire ecosystem, and
  • capability to compete with other ecosystems.
According to Wilczyński [19], the theory of complexity that concentrates on the interaction between elements comprising a single system [20] is particularly suitable for describing phenomena in a business ecosystem. The business ecosystem supports phenomena typical of a complex adaptive system. These phenomena include emergence, self-organization and coevolution [19]. In the complexity theory, emergence is linked to the generation of more outputs than the sum of system components [20]. Emergence is also based on the assumption that a change in one part of the system results in unexpected changes in other parts of the system [21].

3. A Postal Operator and the Digitalization of the Economy

The modern economy is undergoing major changes, especially regarding modern technologies which determine the development of a digital economy [22]. The transition to the digital economy is based on the replacement of existing institutions by virtual institutions and direct social relations by social media [23,24]. It should be stressed that contemporary businesses that want to survive and compete effectively on the market are forced to innovate and develop modern products and services that meet customer expectations and offer an added value [25]. The postal industry has also been affected. Being one of the oldest forms of communication, the postal service has kept its unique character in the environment where digital content is transferred instantaneously and in large volumes. At the same time, considering that the postal market is an integral part of economic changes and processes, postal market players should identify and exploit opportunities offered by the rapid development of high-tech electronic communications services. They should also build their position on the digital market by creating a digital postal ecosystem. Key factors in the functioning of the postal market include the changing legal and economic environment, ever growing customer expectations, and aggressive competition due to globalization and convergence. The latter involves fusion of various techniques, networks and market segments.
However, considering that modern electronic communications services complement rather than substitute postal services, electronic communications services, such as e-mail and SMS, are setting new directions for the development of postal operators. While offering these services, they significantly contribute to the development of the e-economy and the economy in general. Another important factor is the link between service segments (parcels, express and courier mail) and the e-commerce market based on the use of information society services. In these areas, postal operators may use online services offered via the Internet [26]. The multi-faceted perception of innovation drivers involves an interactive relationship between the organization and its environment [27].
It should be emphasized that modern technologies used by operators enable them not only to process data, but they are also used to provide added value for users in the form of e-products, e-services, and business models.
Consequently, information technologies and digitalization of the economy force postal operators to implement new services, such as hybrid mail. It is important to combine proposed solutions for postal e-services with enhanced efficiency and access to the technology market.
It is commonly believed that postal operators could combine the physical world with the digital one and occupy a strong position on the market while competing with suppliers of digital platforms. Postal operators are frequently seen as public trust institutions. Their advantage is the high accessibility to the post office network. Since postal operators (in particular, designated ones) operate a widespread domestic infrastructure, they enjoy the potential to become partners in providing e-administration services with the use of modern information technologies. This could definitely strengthen the development of the information society. Postal platforms, which provide electronic postal services, can be used to support communication between citizens and authorities.
The process is reflected by the Polish Postal Law as it changed the definition of the ‘postal service’ and extended its scope by the following provision: “postal service includes the transmission of mailings by electronic means, provided they have a physical form of a mailing at the stage of reception, handling or delivery of information” [28].
The Universal Postal Union (UPU) has also introduced the term ‘e-mail’ to emphasize that new ICT technologies should be used to stimulate the growth of the postal market by enhancing its offer with modern services. Such services can create new potential by adding value to conventional letter and parcel delivery, thereby increasing the efficiency of postal operators and their contribution to the development of the information society [29,30,31,32,33]. In addition to traditional services enriched with new elements (e.g., SMS information about mailing), as well as logistics and financial services, an increasing number of postal operators provide their services online. These include advanced e-commerce, e-courier, e-mail, e-publications, designing and distribution of advertisements (including sale of postal addresses), Internet auctions, and physical and non-physical mail integration through dedicated and customer-oriented websites (e.g., e-mail service where customer decides to deliver, archive, print or delete) [34]. This creates strong direct competition between postal operators and electronic communications companies, a competition which also stimulates their development to meet future challenges.
The analysis of the postal market indicates changes in the number of mailings and selected electronic communications services, as well as revenues from the sale of services in selected segments of the national communications sector. It also shows positive development of the postal market in parallel to the rapid growth of electronic communications services [35,36,37,38]. Although the postal market does not have a significant impact on the development of the national economy, traditional postal services support continuity of communication.
In order to measure the development of postal e-services, the UPU selected 87 designated operators in UPU member states (The Universal Postal Union surveyed 192 postal operators (members of UPU). The parties surveyed filled out and sent back 45% of questionnaires). E-services considered included those provided directly or on the basis of agreements with third parties through digital channels to individuals, businesses and state administration in a given country. Although the main channel for delivering e-services is the Internet, the analysis also covers mobile phones, tablets, call centers and TV. Four groups of e-services are distinguished [39]:
  • electronic mail and e-government,
  • e-commerce,
  • electronic financial services and payment solutions, and
  • electronic support services (auxiliary).
While developing a series of new e-services, the focus was put on digital functionalities, whereas their “physical” aspects (such as delivery or logistics) were excluded. To determine the advancement of electronic postal services provided by designated operators, the Universal Postal Union applied a holistic approach to research. It was based on three basic postal e-service indicators (Postal Electronic Services Index, UPU PES Index) and resulting from them, the Global PES Index. Postal e-services provided by 87 operators are assessed in three areas: their scope (PES 1), external environment (PES 2) and their innovation capacity (PES 3). Table 1 presents values of individual indicators.
For a given e-service, responses are quantified as follows: yes = 1, no = 0, under development = 0.5. These values are averaged and calculated for each country surveyed. The indicator value shows how many times the standard deviation differs from the mean value. It is also used to compare the distribution at different average values. Then, the indicator value is normalized by the determining of country’s position in the ranking.
PES 1 (scope of e-services) takes into account the evaluation of current e-services provided by designated operators in the selected countries, their strategies applied to the provision of e-services, and their respective categories (e-mail and e-government, e-commerce, digital financial and payment solutions, support/auxiliary services). PES 2 (external environment index) reflects external forces (technological, regulatory and market-competitive environments) that have a direct impact on operators’ ability to enter the digital postal market and taking over its significant share (including entry barriers and key players in this segment). The index is expressed as the aggregated value of the Telecommunications Infrastructure Index (TI Index) and survey data. PES 3 (innovation capacity) reflects the actual development of postal e-services. It combines the level of readiness for digital innovation (human capital, IT infrastructure, financial and organizational effects of digital transformation), strategies applied and the Global Innovation Index. It was assumed that the level of postal e-services in EU countries is reflected by values of individual PES indices presented above.
According to the global PES indicator, Finland is the leader among the 87 UPU countries (also lead position in PES 1 and PES 2). Austria, the Czech Republic and Italy are in the top ten, while Poland is ranked 23rd. It is worth noting the relatively low positions of developed European economies, e.g., Portugal’s highest position (14) regarding the Innovation Index (PES 3). Many of them are below 50. One of the reasons is probably already a high level of development and, therefore, they show a lower potential for innovation growth than less technologically advanced countries. According to the UPU survey, apart from China, forefront positions in the ranking are occupied by Iran, Mauritius and Tunisia. Since 2004, EU countries are ranked from 23 to 47, with Bulgaria 78.
The PES index for Poland is 0.56, which gives Poland the 23rd position among countries surveyed. Its wider analysis shows that there are delays in the implementation of technological solutions, regulations, and market and competition measures.
Among index components, the highest assessment was given to PES 1, which evaluates currently provided e-services by designated operators in selected countries and strategies applied to e-services in general, as well as their specific categories (e-post and e-government, e-commerce, digital financial and payment solutions, support/auxiliary services). The index is 0.55, which translates into the 25th position in the ranking. Poland has a slightly lower position (33) regarding PES 2, with the index value of 0.60. PES 2 takes into account parameters reflecting external forces (technological environment, legal framework and market and completion factors).
According to PES 3, Poland is ranked 36th, with the index level of 0.52. It is unsatisfactory, since it reflects a low level of postal e-services and limited capacity for digital innovation (human resources, IT infrastructure, financial and organizational consequences of digital transformation). Although the development of e-services has moved traditional boundaries in the postal services sector, many operators have been surprised by the scale of the growth [40]. According to a number of experts and scientists, high-quality postal e-services offer a huge potential for operators which are designated as partners by the state administration to promote the development of e-government services [41].
In conclusion, it can be pointed out that market experts should focus more on these indices, as their low level can be a symptom of a weaker engagement of postal services in digitalization than in other EU countries and a limited efficiency of domestic economic policy tools that support the development of the information society and e-economy.

4. Research Methodology

4.1. The Survey of Postal E-Services

The CAWI (Computer-Assisted Web Interview) survey implemented in quarter 1 of 2020 covered:
  • 102 Poles above 18 years of age living in the north-west part of Poland,
  • 77 businesses operating in the north-west part of Poland, and
  • 11 experts of the Polish communications market.
The article is based on the following objectives to survey individuals and businesses:
  • Non-random selection.
  • Convenience sample.
  • Predefined sample size.
Statistical significance was set at α= 0.1, whereas the permissible measurement error at d = 0.09.
The largest age group among individual clients includes people of 45–59 (64%). People 60+ accounted for 23%, and the youngest individuals (18–44) accounted for 13%.
As regards to businesses, service and retail companies prevailed, respectively 45% and 39%. Micro and small enterprises accounted for 16% of businesses surveyed, whereas medium-sized enterprises accounted for 75%. The smallest group consisted of large enterprises (9%). Nearly a half of companies (49%) concentrated their business on regional markets, whereas every fourth company offered their services or products not only on the domestic market but also foreign markets.
The survey also included interviews with 11 experts. Telecommunications and postal market experts represented the following institutions: Office of Electronic Communication (UKE), the Polish postal and telecommunications market regulator, Research and Academic Computer Network (NASK), National Institute of Telecommunications, and lead research centers dealing with communications. The snowball method was used to select experts, i.e., experts have provided referrals to recruit other telecommunications experts until the group reached its target size.
The survey evaluated postal e-services provided by the operator in the context of the digital economy. Due to its nature and limited volume, the article further discusses only selected findings. A general goal is to examine expectations, behavior of individual and business customers in the context of postal e-services. Moreover, it was important to examine opinions of postal and telecommunications experts.

4.2. Case Study

The starting point of the analysis is to determine which e-services are most often used. Individual respondents have been asked what kind of postal e-services they use (e-mail, online banking, mobile apps on their smartphones/tablets, online tax return) as shown in Figure 2.
Among e-services, respondents most often used e-mail (79.41% responses, mainly respondents of 18–44 and 45–59 years of age). Fewer respondents of 45–59 used e-mail, whereas respondents of 18–44 maintained at a steady level. In general, 72.55% of the surveyed declared to use electronic banking. It is important to note that every year, the number of users delivering their tax returns through an online platform has been growing [42].
Another issue was the awareness and use of postal e-services. Figure 3 shows the level of knowledge and use of postal e-services among individual customers.
In the individual customers’ group, knowledge of basic postal e-services, such as parcel tracking, service information, customer contact and service, and the bar code search engine appears to be high (above 85%). Other postal e-services, however, are little known (less than 35%). The highest use of e-services has been noted regarding information about postal services and charges (73.53%). Other e-services enjoy much less interest (below 37.25%).
Other reasons for using e-services noted in the survey apply to business customers as shown in Figure 4.
As with individual customers, businesses show a similar level of knowledge about individual e-services. However, in terms of their use, this group of customers has shown better results. Business customers are more likely to use e-services, such as mail tracking, service information, customer contact and support, and the bar code search engine. The analysis of responses demonstrates that parcel tracking has been implemented at a similar level by all parties surveyed. Among businesses, medium-sized enterprises are the largest group interested in maintaining online contact and providing services to customers. Considering the area of operation, parcel tracking is the most popular among businesses on both domestic and foreign markets. For them, the service is particularly important. As many as 48.44% of business customers use the mail notification service. Business customers also buy e-stamps. Summarizing, business customers are more likely to use e-services. This is mainly due to the ease of information management with the use of modern information technologies and time savings.
The second part of the survey assessed postal e-services offered by the designated operator in Poland. This assessment identified variables that have a significant impact on the perception of postal e-services. These variables are as follows:
  • scope of e-services provided
  • legal and regulatory environment (security)
  • competitiveness
  • telecommunications infrastructure
  • level of e-services
  • level of innovation
  • digital awareness
  • digital skills.
The assessment of these variables is based on a scale of 0 to 10, where 0 is very low and 10 is very high. Among individual customers, the telecommunications infrastructure received the highest rating (7). It means that customers believe that there is a technical capacity for the provision of postal e-services. Next was digital awareness (6) which could be defined as the understanding of the need to develop digital competences. The same assessment was given to the level of the regulatory framework, especially in the context of security. It means that individual customers are aware of legal security measures applied. However, the lowest rating by individual customers was given to the level of e-services provided by the postal operator. For customer feedback, see Figure 5.
As in the case of individual customers, businesses gave their highest rating to the telecommunications infrastructure (8). It means that businesses believe that there is a technical capacity to provide postal e-services. Slightly lower (7) was the assessment of the legal and regulatory environment. The range of e-services provided by the postal operator was assessed slightly above the average (6). Digital awareness of the society was rated 5 by the surveyed. Business customers surveyed assigned the lowest rating to digital skills. This has been based on the direct observation of customers. For the opinion of business customers, see Figure 6.
Particularly interesting is the opinion of postal market experts, as shown in Figure 7. In comparison with individual and business customers, their assessment of the services was lower.
Only the legal and regulatory environment received the highest assessment. According to experts, legal regulations determine the secure provision of e-services. Variables, such as competitiveness and digital skills, have been assessed at an average level (5). Elements, such as the scope of the services provided, their advancement, and the digital awareness among the public are assessed at level 3.

5. Discussion

5.1. Main Problems

The discussion in the article shows that the knowledge of practical application of postal e-services is an important and difficult issue from the point of view of the digital post ecosystem development. The analysis of EU postal markets, including the Polish market, has shown that the trend is to substitute traditional dedicated documents with online solutions. It should be emphasized that the new environment supports all advantages of traditional postal services, including mailings, financial transactions and insurance, and provides an opportunity to select location, accessibility, and time during and after the transaction. With the rapid growth of e-commerce, the digital ecosystem has become an increasingly important area of postal services. Summarizing, to be competitive, postal operators need to digitalize traditional postal services. By doing so, they can secure their position on the market. As mentioned previously, the goal of the article is to offer a proposal for a designated operator to create a digital postal ecosystem.
Research findings shown above are based on scientific research. This helped to develop activities aimed to digitalize the incumbent operator and thus to present the Post 4.0 model.
It should be noted that recently in EU member states, the commitment to modern technologies promoting digitalization of postal services has increased tremendously. These technologies enable to provide modern services which are an added value to traditional postal services. The analysis of foreign postal markets [43] has shown that, in addition to post and parcel delivery services, operators have been expanding by adding new services (e.g., SMS notification). Apart from traditional logistics and financial services, operators increasingly often provide online services.
Further development of Polish and European postal service markets should proceed toward e-government services. Examples in the EU show that these services can be used by national governments to exchange correspondence and documents with citizens and to expedite communication. They constitute a major improvement for citizens. Additionally, such services enable to store official correspondence on a designated platform. It should be stressed that today, when virtual exchange of correspondence has been growing, a modern state should adapt its potential to the trend and provide citizens with an efficient digital service. It should be noted that modern technologies ensure a high level of security for the communication between the state and citizens. However, people without relevant competences or the ability to receive digital correspondence from public authorities may be exempted from this form of communication and use the traditional postal service.
Moreover, several postal operators have already used this opportunity, whereas others are still getting ready for it. More importantly, apart from the development of personalized services in the digital space, postal operators need to cooperate with their governments, while concentrating on their social environment. This is particularly important since the society is not prepared to utilize digital postal services in full. Summarizing, it is necessary to implement measures designed to establish the digital e-post ecosystem.

5.2. Proposed Operation of the Digital E-Post Ecosystem

The digitalization of the economy and society is one of the most rapid transformations of our times. While it opens new opportunities for postal operators, it brings uncertainty and various threats, e.g., social consequences of production automation and broadly understood security. The nature of these revolutionary changes is of particular importance, since it translates into completely new values for parties operating on the market and consumers. To meet these challenges, individual companies, public administration, society and national economies need to undergo digital transformation. Traditional mailings form a crucial area for postal operators. However, the digitalization of the economy poses a major risk of reducing the volume of regular mailings, especially in developed countries. The trend is directly linked with e-substitution of traditional postal services. On the one hand, it is the most threatened area, and on the other hand, it offers tremendous opportunities, provided a new concept for services is implemented. The new concept should enable to replace the handling of traditional mailings with modern information technologies while maintaining the previous role of postal operators.
The provision of digital services requires state approval, appropriate economic policy tools and major investment in modern technologies and infrastructure. Figure 8 shows actions leading to the digitalization of the incumbent operator.
This option enables to counteract digital exclusion [44] by promoting universal access. The activity of postal operators in the area of e-services may lead to the strengthening of their position on the postal market [45]. Figure 9 shows the Post 4.0 model for the postal services market.
Post 4.0 is an action proposal where economic regulations are the most important. This action proposal should take into account capital-intensive investment in modern technologies and IT systems as pillars for shifting the activity of postal operators to the virtual space. Although administrative and institutional regulations are less developed, coordination in this area is necessary, especially in the context of the development of e-services. Particular emphasis should be put on e-government and the engagement of the state administration in the process at local, regional and national levels. Moreover, awareness building and intensive IT education should focus on public e-services. Administrative regulations may help the government to create a possibility to use the incumbent operator’s platform.

6. Conclusions

6.1. Contributions to Theory

The article considers the following research question: Do we have to digitalize postal services? The scientific research helped the authors to find an unequivocal answer to the question. Thus, the authors can confirm that it is necessary to digitalize postal services. The operation of the postal market is an important component of both domestic and international advanced economic processes. It should be emphasized, that the significance of the industry is proportional to the strengthening of development trends in the contemporary market economy.
Several general conclusions can be drawn based on descriptive and theoretical parts of the study. They boil down to the following:
  • to ensure access to postal e-services, a proposal needs to be formulated for the development of the digital postal ecosystem;
  • since previous activity on the postal service market, related to the digitalization of postal services, failed to produce desired changes, it is necessary to suggest measures targeted at the digital postal ecosystem to meet the goal. The implementation of the latter should be supervised by the UPU.

6.2. Contributions to Practice

Postal services have maintained their close relationship with social and economic changes. In its essence, the contemporary postal market is a dynamic system, where changes depend on two main factors:
  • digitalization of the business ecosystem, and
  • advances in information technologies.
To summarize the discussion on the action proposal for the designated operator, it should be noted that modern technologies develop toward shifting services to the Internet and converting them into e-services. As shown in the article, such services are used by national governments to exchange correspondence and documents with citizens and to provide a variety of e-services. Additionally, the development opens up a possibility to keep official correspondence on a dedicated platform. It should be stressed, however, that correspondence is increasingly often exchanged online and every modern state should develop its potential in line with the trend and provide citizens with efficient digital services. Undoubtedly, a solution that could improve the provision of postal e-services is the digital ecosystem.

6.3. Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research

Together with the technological advances, we witness changes in the electronic communications market. The mode of communication has been changing both in the society and the economy. The asynchronous development of the postal service market has produced imbalances in the access to these services. This results in the digital exclusion or the digital divide. The Polish information society has been also affected by the digital exclusion. Its symptoms include the shortage of basic digital competences among digitally excluded members of the society. This may cause disparities in access to opportunities created by the contemporary postal service market. In the future, this may result in the social exclusion of certain groups.
It should be emphasized that public services, including postal services, are common goods and, as such, these should be non-excludable. Moreover, public goods are expected to meet certain quality standards regardless of the number of people using them. This means that every new customer cannot impede the rights of other people.
In recent years, social exclusion has led to digital exclusion. Today, if we fail to eliminate digital exclusion, it can contribute to social exclusion, and this may lead to serious social and economic problems. For this reason, in the digital postal ecosystem, steps need to be taken to integrate digitally excluded people and prevent the deepening of the digital divide in the society.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.B.-G. and A.D.-K.; methodology, A.B.-G. and A.D.-K.; investigation, A.B.-G. and A.D.-K.; writing—original draft preparation, A.B.-G. and A.D.-K.; writing—review and editing, A.D.-K.; the CAWI method, multidimensional comparative analysis, A.D.-K.; visualization, A.D.-K.; supervision, A.B.-G. and A.D.-K.; project administration, A.B.-G. and A.D.-K.; funding acquisition, A.B.-G. and A.D.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the program of the Minister of Science and Higher Education under the name “Regional Excellence Initiative” in the years 2019–2022; project number 001/RID/2018/19; the amount of financing PLN 10,684,000.00.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lipińska, A. Koncepcje i Kluczowe Czynniki Rozwoju Ekosystemów Startupów; Studia Ekonomiczne, Zeszyty Naukowe. Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Katowicach: Katowice, Poland, 2018; Volume 351, pp. 46–50. [Google Scholar]
  2. Carayannis, E.G.; Sindakis, S.; Walter, C. Business model innovation as lever of organizational sustainability. J. Technol. Transf. 2015, 40, 85–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Peltoniemi, M. Business Ecosystem: A Conceptual Model of an Organisation Population from the Perspectives of Complexity and Evolution; Tampere University of Technology (TUT); University of Tampere (UTA): Tampere, Finland, 2005; pp. 54–56. [Google Scholar]
  4. Peltoniemi, M.; Vuori, E.; Laihonen, H. Business ecosystem as a tool for the conceptualisation of the external diversity of an organisation. In Proceedings of the Complexity, Science and Society Conference, Liverpool, UK, 11–14 September 2005; pp. 11–14. [Google Scholar]
  5. Battistella, C.; Colucci, K.; De Toni, A.F.; Nonino, F. Methodology of business ecosystems network analysis: A case study in Telecom Italia Future Centre. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2013, 80, 1194–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hsieh, Y.-C.; Lin, K.-Y.; Lu, C.; Rong, K. Governing a sustainable business ecosystem in Taiwan’s circular economy: The story of spring pool glass. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Chen, F.; Deng, P.; Wan, J.; Zhang, D.; Vasilakos, A.V.; Rong, X. Data mining for the internet of things: Literature review and challenges. Int. J. Distrib. Sens. Netw. 2015, 11, 431047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Stańczyk-Hugiet, E. Strategicznie o Ekosystemie Biznesu; Prace Naukowe Wałbrzyskiej Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania i Przedsiębiorczości: Wałbrzych, Poland, 2015; Volume 32, p. 397. [Google Scholar]
  9. Moore, J.F. Predators and prey: A new ecology of competition. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1993, 71, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Hakansson, H.; Ford, D. How Should Companies Interact in Business Networks. J. Bus. Res. 2002, 55, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rong, K.; Guangyu, H.; Lin, Y.; Shi, Y.; Guo, L. Understanding Business Ecosystem Using a 6C Framework in Internet-of-Things-Based Sectors. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2015, 159, 41–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Senyo, P.K.; Liu, K.; Effah, J. Digital business ecosystem: Literature review and a framework for future research. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 2019, 47, 52–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kamargianni, M.; Matyas, M. The business ecosystem of mobility-as-a-service. In Transportation Research Board; Transportation Research Board: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tsujimoto, M.; Kajikawa, Y.; Tomita, J.; Matsumoto, Y. A review of the ecosystem concept—Towards coherent ecosystem design. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2018, 136, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Heikkilä, M.; Kuivaniemi, L. Ecosystem under Construction: An Action. Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev. 2012, 2, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Drews, P.; Schirmer, I. From enterprise architecture to business ecosystem architecture: Stages and challenges for extending architectures beyond organizational boundaries. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 18th International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops and Demonstrations, Ulm, Germany, 1–2 September 2014; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 13–22. [Google Scholar]
  17. Lewin, R. Complexity: Life at the Edge of Chaos; University of Chicago Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1999; pp. 207–211. [Google Scholar]
  18. Iansiti, M.; Levien, R. The Keystone Advantage: What the New Dynamics of Business Ecosystems Mean for Strategy, Innovation, and Sustainability; Harvard Business Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2004; p. 46. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wilczyński, A. Znaczenie teorii złożoności w ekosystemie biznesowym. Pr. Nauk. Uniw. Ekon. We Wrocławiu 2011, 168, 377–388. [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith, A. Complexity Theory for Organisational Futures Studies. Foresight 2005, 7, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Plowman, D.A.; Solansky, S.; Beck, T.E.; Baker, L.K.; Kulkarni, M.; Travis, D.V. The Role of Leadership in Emergent, Self-organization. Leadersh. Q. 2007, 18, 341–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Wiktor, J.W. Promocja Usług, [w:] Marketing Usług; Czubała, A., Jonas, A., Smoleń, T., Wiktor, J.W., Eds.; Wolters Kluwer: Kraków, Poland, 2006; p. 239. [Google Scholar]
  23. Mężyk, A.; Zamkowska, S. Wpływ elektronicznej gospodarki na funkcjonowanie transportu. Przegląd Nauk Ekon. 2017, 27, 33. [Google Scholar]
  24. Przybylska-Kapuścińska, W. Funkcjonowanie Współczesnej Gospodarki Rynkowej. Rynek Finansowy; CeDeWu: Warszawa, Poland, 2013; pp. 12–16. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kos, B. Systemy informatyczne w tworzeniu wartości dodanej w usługach sektora TSL (Transport-Spedycja-Logistyka). Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Szczecińskiego Ekon. Probl. Usług 2010, 55, 49–58. [Google Scholar]
  26. Dydkowski, G.; Kos, B. Rozwój systemów informatycznych jednostek publicznych. Ekon. Probl. Usług 2017, 126, 327–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Figura, J.; Michałowska, M. Społeczna odpowiedzialność biznesu jako czynnik kształtowania innowacyjności w sektorze transportu-spedycji-logistyki. Probl. Transp. Logistyki 2016, 3, 30. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ustawa z dnia 23 listopada 2012 r. Prawo pocztowe, Dz.U. 2012 poz. 1529, art. 2, ust. 1, pkt 3. Available online: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20120001529 (accessed on 30 December 2020).
  29. Águila-Obra, A.R.D.; Padilla-Meléndez, A.; Al-Dweeri, R. The influence of electronic service quality on loyalty in postal services: The mediating role of satisfaction. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2013, 24, 1111–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Lecic-Cvetkovic, D.; Kostic-Stankovic, M.; Maslic, V. Research of customer satisfaction with the electronic postal services in Serbia. Metal. Int. 2012, 17, 176. [Google Scholar]
  31. Matúšková, M.; Madleňáková, L. The impact of the electronic services to the universal postal services. Procedia Eng. 2017, 178, 258–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Falch, M.; Henten, A. Universal service in a digital world: The demise of postal services. In Proceedings of the 22nd Biennial Conference of the International Telecommunications Society (ITS): “Beyond the Boundaries: Challenges for Business, Policy and Society”, Seoul, Korea, 24–27 June 2018. [Google Scholar]
  33. Tochkov, K. The efficiency of postal services in the age of market liberalization and the internet: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. Util. Policy 2015, 36, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Stolarczyk, A.; Sylwestrzak, M. Usługi świadczone on-line jako wkład publicznych operatorów pocztowych w rozwój społeczeństwa informacyjnego w krajach Unii Europejskiej. Zesz. Nauk. Uniw. Szczecińskiego Ekon. Probl. Usług 2012, 88, 810–816. [Google Scholar]
  35. Lăzărescu, C. The Postal Market—A New Economic Challenge in the Context of Globalization. J. Humanist. Soc. Stud. 2017, 8, 187–196. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pilinkienė, V.; Deltuvaitė, V.; Daunorienė, A.; Gaidelys, V. Competitiveness Creation and Maintenance in the Postal Services Industry; Springer International Publishing: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Okholm, H.B.; Basalisco, B.; Boivie, A.M.; Gårdebrink, J. Challenges of regulating quality of service in the postal industry. In New Business and Regulatory Strategies in the Postal Sector; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 29–43. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hearn, J. Postal Services: Quo Vadis? In The Changing Postal Environment; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 23–38. [Google Scholar]
  39. Corredera, D.N. Measuring Postal E-Services Development. A Global Perspective; Version 2.0.; Universal Postal Union: Bern, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  40. Štrbac, S.; Grgurović, B.; Milutinović, J. Mobile Technologies as a Way of Generating the Development of Postal Services. J. Behav. Econ. Financ. Entrep. Account. Transp. 2014, 2, 116–120. [Google Scholar]
  41. Budziewicz-Guźlecka, A.; Drab-Kurowska, A. The analysis of selected issues pertaining to e-administration in Poland in the context of smart city. Nord. Balt. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. 2017, 2017, 17–32. [Google Scholar]
  42. “Annual Tax Returns of Poles”. Available online: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pl/pdf/2020/04/pl-raport-KPMG-w-Polsce-pt-Roczne-zeznania-podatkowe-Polakow-PIT-2019.pdf (accessed on 30 December 2020).
  43. Budziewicz-Guźlecka, A.; Czaplewski, M.; Drab-Kurowska, A. Integracja Sektorowa Wybranych Europejskich Rynków Pocztowych i Telekomunikacyjnych w Warunkach Globalizacji; Wydawnictwo edu-Libri: Kraków, Poland, 2018; pp. 44–73. [Google Scholar]
  44. Budziewicz-Guźlecka, A. Oddziaływanie Polityki Społeczno-Gospodarczej na Zmiany Polskiego Rynku Usług Telekomunikacyjnych; Rozprawy i Studia T. (MCXXXV) 1061, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego: Szczecin, Poland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  45. Drab-Kurowska, A. Polityka Konkurencji w Obszarze Rynku Pocztowego Unii Europejskiej; Uniwersytet Szczeciński, Rozprawy i Studia T. (MCXXVI) 1055; Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego: Szczecin, Poland, 2019; p. 288. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Business ecosystem tiers. Source: Moore, J.F., Heikkilä, M.; Kuivaniemi, L., based on [9,15].
Figure 1. Business ecosystem tiers. Source: Moore, J.F., Heikkilä, M.; Kuivaniemi, L., based on [9,15].
Sustainability 13 02550 g001
Figure 2. Use of e-services among individual clients. Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Figure 2. Use of e-services among individual clients. Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Sustainability 13 02550 g002
Figure 3. Knowledge and use of postal e-services by individuals (% of all respondents). Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Figure 3. Knowledge and use of postal e-services by individuals (% of all respondents). Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Sustainability 13 02550 g003
Figure 4. Knowledge and use of e-services by businesses (% of all respondents). Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Figure 4. Knowledge and use of e-services by businesses (% of all respondents). Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Sustainability 13 02550 g004
Figure 5. Assessment of e-services by individual customers. Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Figure 5. Assessment of e-services by individual customers. Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Sustainability 13 02550 g005
Figure 6. Assessment of e-services by business customers. Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Figure 6. Assessment of e-services by business customers. Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Sustainability 13 02550 g006
Figure 7. Advancement of e-services by experts. Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Figure 7. Advancement of e-services by experts. Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Sustainability 13 02550 g007
Figure 8. Digitalization of the incumbent operator. Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Figure 8. Digitalization of the incumbent operator. Source: Budziewicz - Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41].
Sustainability 13 02550 g008
Figure 9. Post 4.0 model. Source: Budziewicz-Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41]
Figure 9. Post 4.0 model. Source: Budziewicz-Guźlecka A., Drab-Kurowska A. [41]
Sustainability 13 02550 g009
Table 1. Indicators of postal electronic services (PES) in selected EU countries.
Table 1. Indicators of postal electronic services (PES) in selected EU countries.
Global PES IndexPES 1PES 2PES 3
ItemValueItemValueItemValueItemValue
Finland10.8820.9930.91610.20
Austria40.8050.86110.77260.61
Czech Rep.50.7540.86180.67410.49
Italy90.71130.6840.87640.18
Portugal110.7090.74260.64140.73
France120.69120.68100.77480.43
Hungary150.67110.69160.67380.51
Netherlands160.67180.6190.80520.40
Greece220.57230.56210.65590.29
Poland230.56240.55330.60360.52
Slovenia240.56270.50270.63230.64
Bulgaria320.49560.2760.85780.13
Spain370.47300.45430.53560.34
Slovakia510.41420.38530.46470.43
Great Britain 780.16S70.00630.40860.04
Source: Corredera, D.N, r, based on [39].
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Drab-Kurowska, A.; Budziewicz-Guźlecka, A. The Digital Post Ecosystem—Example of Poland in the Context of Research. Sustainability 2021, 13, 2550. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052550

AMA Style

Drab-Kurowska A, Budziewicz-Guźlecka A. The Digital Post Ecosystem—Example of Poland in the Context of Research. Sustainability. 2021; 13(5):2550. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052550

Chicago/Turabian Style

Drab-Kurowska, Anna, and Agnieszka Budziewicz-Guźlecka. 2021. "The Digital Post Ecosystem—Example of Poland in the Context of Research" Sustainability 13, no. 5: 2550. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052550

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop