Dunuwila, P.; Hamada, K.; Takeyama, K.; Panasiuk, D.; Hoshino, T.; Morimoto, S.; Tahara, K.; Daigo, I.
Influence of Different Allocation Methods for Recycling and Dynamic Inventory on CO2 Savings and Payback Times of Light-Weighted Vehicles Computed under Product- and Fleet-Based Analyses: A Case of Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles. Sustainability 2021, 13, 13935.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413935
AMA Style
Dunuwila P, Hamada K, Takeyama K, Panasiuk D, Hoshino T, Morimoto S, Tahara K, Daigo I.
Influence of Different Allocation Methods for Recycling and Dynamic Inventory on CO2 Savings and Payback Times of Light-Weighted Vehicles Computed under Product- and Fleet-Based Analyses: A Case of Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles. Sustainability. 2021; 13(24):13935.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413935
Chicago/Turabian Style
Dunuwila, Pasan, Ko Hamada, Kentaro Takeyama, Daryna Panasiuk, Takeo Hoshino, Shinichiro Morimoto, Kiyotaka Tahara, and Ichiro Daigo.
2021. "Influence of Different Allocation Methods for Recycling and Dynamic Inventory on CO2 Savings and Payback Times of Light-Weighted Vehicles Computed under Product- and Fleet-Based Analyses: A Case of Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles" Sustainability 13, no. 24: 13935.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413935
APA Style
Dunuwila, P., Hamada, K., Takeyama, K., Panasiuk, D., Hoshino, T., Morimoto, S., Tahara, K., & Daigo, I.
(2021). Influence of Different Allocation Methods for Recycling and Dynamic Inventory on CO2 Savings and Payback Times of Light-Weighted Vehicles Computed under Product- and Fleet-Based Analyses: A Case of Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles. Sustainability, 13(24), 13935.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413935
